rapid post-earthquake building monitoring
DESCRIPTION
Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring. Bob Nigbor NEES@UCLA. Engineering Post-Earthquake Reconnaissance. EERI “Learning From Earthquakes” Program. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Rapid Post-Earthquake
Building Monitoring
Bob NigborNEES@UCLA
![Page 2: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Engineering Post-Earthquake Reconnaissance
![Page 3: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
EERI “Learning From Earthquakes” Program
In 1973, EERI formally initiated the Learning from Earthquakes (LFE) Program. This program, funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation, sends out multi-disciplinary teams of researchers (e.g., earth scientists, engineers, social scientists) into the field to investigate and to learn from the damaging effects of earthquakes and tsunamis. The reconnaissance team makes a rapid, general damage survey of the affected area, documents initial important observations from the tsunami and/or earthquake, and assesses the need for follow-up areas of research.
![Page 4: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Rapid Aftershock Monitoring of Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Santiago, Chile by NEES@UCLA
following the February 27, 2010 Mw=8.8 Earthquake
Project Collaborators and Contributors:John Wallace, PI (UCLA)Bob Nigbor co-PI (UCLA)Anne Lemnitzer (Cal State Fullerton)Alberto Salamanca (NEES@UCLA)Derek Skolnik (Kinemetrics)Leonardo Massone (Univ. of Chile, Santiago)Juan Carlos de la Llerra (Catholic University of Chile, Santiago)+ the EERI Reconnaissance Team
![Page 6: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Preparation of Instrumentation provided by NEES@UCLA
![Page 7: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Instrumentation Two 24-channel systems:
› 4 Q330s› Ethernet LAN› GPS timing› Netbook running Rockhound, continuous and
triggered recording› Accelerometers› Displacement sensors (LVDTs)› Battery power
Packing› Generic suitcases› Letters with lots of logos & stamps
![Page 8: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Instrumented BuildingsLocated in Santiago, Chile
Buildings selected based on:- Access and permission- Typical design layouts representative for Chile and the US- Local collaborator for building selection: Juan Carlos de la Llerra
Ambient Vibration2 Aftershocks
Ambient Vibration30 Aftershocks
Ambient Vibration4 Aftershocks
![Page 9: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Building B:
-10 story RC residential building- Structural system: Shear Walls- Post Earthquake damage: I. Shear wall failure, II. Column buckling, III. Extensive non-
structural failure, IV. slab bending &
concrete spalling
![Page 10: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Repetitive Damage at the -1 level (Parking level):Wall-Slab intersections
Observed Damage in the 10 story shear wall building:
![Page 11: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1st floor shear wall damage
![Page 12: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Column buckling at first floor
![Page 13: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Story Accelerations
40 60 80 100 120
-20
0
20
EW Acceleration
Roo
f (cm
/s2 )
40 60 80 100 120
-20
0
20
9th
(cm
/s2 )
40 60 80 100 120
-20
0
20
2nd
(cm
/s2 )
40 60 80 100 120
-20
0
20
Grn
d (c
m/s
2 )
40 60 80 100 120
-20
0
20
NS Acceleration
Roo
f (cm
/s2 )
40 60 80 100 120
-20
0
20
9th
(cm
/s2 )
40 60 80 100 120
-20
0
20
2nd
(cm
/s2 )
40 60 80 100 120
-20
0
20
Grn
d (c
m/s
2 )
Roof
9th
2nd
-1 st
![Page 14: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Story Displacements
40 60 80 100 120
-2
0
2
EW Displacement
Roo
f (m
m)
40 60 80 100 120
-2
0
2
9th
(mm
)
40 60 80 100 120
-2
0
2
2nd
(mm
)
40 60 80 100 120
-2
0
2
Grn
d (m
m)
40 60 80 100 120
-2
0
2
NS Displacement
Roo
f (m
m)
40 60 80 100 120
-2
0
2
9th
(mm
)
40 60 80 100 120
-2
0
2
2nd
(mm
)
40 60 80 100 120
-2
0
2
Grn
d (m
m)
Roof
9th
2nd
-1 st
![Page 15: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Particle Motion
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
EW (mm)
NS
(mm
)
Roof9th2ndGround
![Page 16: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Shear and Flexure Deformations
Figure 4: Shear-flexure interaction for a wall subject to lateral loading. (adapted from Massone and Wallace, 2004)
![Page 17: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Shear and flexure deformations
The rotation for flexure was taken at the base of the wall (so the top displacement is multiplied by the wall height), which is the largest value expected for flexure. If we assume that the flexure corresponds to a rotation at wall mid-height, the flexural component should be multiplied by 0.5.
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2W
all t
op D
isp
(mm
)
Time (s)
shearflexure
![Page 18: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Some Lessons Learned Getting equipment in (luggage vs shipping, invitation
letters, label equipment as non permanent) Local collaboration is critical (building access,
installation, translations) GPS antenna location is critical Ethernet cables have variable quality, bring
your own plenum-rated & shielded Trigger and recording needs optimization,
consider continuous recording for few-day installations
Local student operation is possible but requires training & Skype
![Page 19: Rapid Post-Earthquake Building Monitoring](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816948550346895de0db16/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
NeedsNeeds Reduced cabling or wireless Simpler systems (Black Box) that can
accompany the recon engineers and be deployed by non-experts