rap ch3 large scale 2 part3-1

34
1 3.7 Diffraction allows RF signals to propagate to obstructed (shadowed) regions - over the horizon (around curved surface of earth) - behind obstructions received field strength rapidly decreases as receiver moves into obstructed region diffraction field often has sufficient strength to produce useful signal Segments 3.7.1 Fresnel Zone Geometry

Upload: asim-mazin

Post on 07-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 1/34

1

3.7 Diffraction

• allows RF signals to propagate to obstructed (shadowed) regions

- over the horizon (around curved surface of earth)

- behind obstructions

• received field strength rapidly decreases as receiver moves into

obstructed region

• diffraction field often has sufficient strength to produce useful signal

Segments

3.7.1 Fresnel Zone Geometry

Page 2: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 2/34

2

Huygen’s Principal 

• all points on a wavefront can be considered as point sources for

producing 2ndry wavelets

• 2ndry wavelets combine to produce new wavefront in the direction

of propagation

• diffraction arises from propagation of 2ndry wavefront into

shadowed area

• field strength of diffracted wave in shadow region = electric field

components of all 2ndry wavelets in the space around the obstacle

slit knife edge

Page 3: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 3/34

3

Excess Path Length = difference between direct path & diffracted path

= d  –  (d 1+d 2) 

3.7.1 Fresnel Zone Geometry

• consider a transmitter-receiver pair in free space

• let obstruction of effective height h & width   protrude to page

- distance from transmitter = d 1 - distance from receiver = d 2- LOS distance between transmitter & receiver = d = d 1+d 2 

Knife Edge Diffraction Geometry for ht = hr 

TX RX

hr ht 

d 2d 1hobs

d  d =  d 1+  d 2, where , 22

id h  d i =

2

1

2 d h  = 2

2

2 d h +  –  (d 1+d 2)

Page 4: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 4/34

4

Phase Difference between two paths given as 

3.54

 

 

 

 

21

212

2 d d 

d d h   

Assume h << d 1 , h << d 2 and h >>   then by substitution and Taylor

Series Approximation

Knife Edge Diffraction Geometry ht > hr 

 

d 2d 1

 

 

h TX

RX

hr 

ht hobs

h’  

 

 

 

 

21

212

2

22

d d 

d d h

 

 

 

  = 3.55=

 

 

 

 

21

212 2

2 d d 

d d h

 

 

Page 5: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 5/34

5

(0.4 rad ≈ 23o

)

 x = 0.4 rad tan(x) = 0.423

tan(x)

 x 

when tan x  x   =   +  

     

  

 

21

21

21 d d 

d d h

h

h

Equivalent Knife Edge Diffraction Geometry with hr  subtracted from

all other heights 

 

 

d 2d 1

TX

RXht -hr 

 hobs-hr 

180- 

tan   =      1

h

tan =     2d 

h

Page 6: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 6/34

6

Eqn 3.55 for  is often normalized using the dimensionless Fresnel-

Kirchoff  diffraction parameter, v 

)(2 )(2

21

21

21

21

d d d d 

d d d d h

  

 v = (3.56)

when   is in units of radians    is given as

 = 2

2v

 (3.57)

from equations 3.54-3.57  , the phase difference, between LOS &

diffracted path is function of • obstruction’s height & position

• transmitters & receivers height & position

simplify geometry by reducing all heights to minimum height

Page 7: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 7/347

(1) Fresnel Zones

• used to describe diffraction loss as a function of path difference,  

around an obstruction

• represents successive regions between transmitter and receiver• nth region = region where path length of secondary waves is n /2 

greater than total LOS path length

• regions form a series of ellipsoids with foci at Tx & Rx

λ /2 + d

1.5λ + d

λ + d

at 1 GHzλ = 0.3m

Page 8: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 8/348

Construct circles on the axis of Tx-Rx such that = n  /2, for given integer n

• radii of circles depends on location of normal plane between Tx and Rx

• given n, the set of points where  = n  /2 defines a family of ellipsoids

•  assuming d 1 ,d 2 >> r n

=

 

 

 

 

21

212

22 d d 

d d hn 

 R

slice an ellipsoid with a plane yields circle with radius r n given as

h = r n =21

21

d d 

d d n

 

= n2v =

21

21

21

21

21

21 22

d d 

d d 

d d 

d d n

d d 

d d h

 

 

 

then Kirchoff  diffraction parameter is given as

thus for given r n  v defines an ellipsoid with constant  = n  /2 

Page 9: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 9/349

Phase Difference,    pertaining to nth Fresnel Zone is

(n-1)   ≤    ≤ n  

• contribution to the electric field at Rx from successive Fresnel Zones

tend to be in phase opposition destructive interference

• generally must keep 1st Fresnel Zone unblocked to obtain free space

transmission conditions

• 1st Fresnel Zone is volume enclosed by ellipsoid defined for n = 1

2

1  n

2

 n≤  Δ ≤ 

nth Fresnel Zone is volume enclosed by ellipsoid defined for n and is defined

as relative to LOS path 

Page 10: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 10/34

10

 destructive interference

•  =   /2

•d =   /2 + d 1+d 2 

For 1st Fresnel Zone, at a distance d 1 from Tx & d 2 from Rx

• diffracted wave will have a path length of d  

d 1  d 2 

Tx Rx

constructive interference:

• d =  + d 1+d 2 

•  =   

For 2nd

Fresnel Zone

Page 11: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 11/34

11

Fresnel Zones

• slice the ellipsoids with a transparent plane between transmitter &

receiver – obtain series of concentric circles 

• circles represent loci of  2ndry wavelets that propagate to receiversuch that total path length increases by  /2 for each successive circle

• effectively produces alternatively constructive & destructive 

interference to received signal

 R

O

1

2

Q

• If an obstruction were present, it could block some of the Fresnel

zones

Page 12: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 12/34

12

Assuming, d 1 & d 2 >> r n  radius of nth Fresnel Zone can be given

in terms of n, d 1 ,d 2 ,   

21

21

d d 

d d n

 r n = (3.58)

• radii of concentric circles depends on location between Tx & Rx

- maximum radii at d 1 = d 2 (midpoint), becomes smaller as plane

moves towards receiver or transmitter

- shadowing is sensitive to obstruction’s position and frequency

Excess Total Path Length,   for each ray passing through nth circle

  2

3  /23

  /21

=n  /2 n

Tx

 Rx

Page 13: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 13/34

13

(2) Diffraction Loss caused by blockage of 2ndry (diffracted) waves

partial energy from 2ndry waves is diffracted around an obstacle

• obstruction blocks energy from some of the Fresnel zones

• only portion of transmitted energy reaches receiver

received energy = vector sum of contributions from all unobstructed

Fresnel zones

• depends on geometry of obstruction

• Fresnel Zones indicate phase of secondary (diffracted) E-field

Obstacles may block transmission paths – causing diffraction loss

• construct family of ellipsoids between TX & RX to represent

Fresnel zones

• join all points for which excess path delay is multiple of   /2 

• compare geometry of obstacle with Fresnel zones to determine

diffraction loss (or gain) 

Page 14: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 14/34

14

(ii) as screen height increases E will vary up & down as screen blocks more

Fresnel zones below LOS path

amplitude of oscillation increases until just in line with Tx and Rx field strength = ½ of unobstructed field strength

Diffraction Losses

Place ideal, perfectly straight screen between Tx and Rx

(i) if top of screen is well below LOS path screen will have little effect

- the Electric field at Rx = E  LOS (free space value)

 Rx

Tx

Page 15: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 15/34

15

Fresnel zones:  ellipsoids with foci at transmit & receive antenna

• if obstruction does not block the volume contained within 1st Fresnel

zone then diffraction loss is minimal

• rule of thumb for LOS uwave:if 55% of 1st Fresnel zone is clear further Fresnel zone clearingdoes not significantly alter diffraction loss

d 2d 1

 and v are positive, thus h is positive

TX RX h 

  excess path length

 /2 

3 /2

)(2 )(2

21

21

21

21

d d d d 

d d d d h

 

  

v =e.g.

Page 16: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 16/34

16

h = 0  and v =0

TX RX d 2

d 1

d 2d 1

 and v are negativeh is negative

TX RX 

 

)(

)(2

21

21

21

21

d d 

d d 

d d 

d d h

  

 v =

Page 17: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 17/34

17

3.7.2 Knife Edge Diffraction Model

Diffraction Losses

• estimating attenuation caused by diffraction over obstacles is

essential for predicting field strength in a given service area

• generally not possible to estimate losses precisely

• theoretical approximations typically corrected with empirical

measurements

Computing Diffraction Losses

• for simple terrain expressions have been derived

• for complex terrain computing diffraction losses is complex

K if d M d l i l d l h id i i h i d f

Page 18: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 18/34

18

Knife-edge Model - simplest model that provides insight into order of magnitude for diffraction loss

• useful for shadowing caused by 1 object treat object as a knife edge

• diffraction losses estimated using classical Fresnel solution for field

behind a knife edge

Consider receiver at R located in shadowed region (diffraction zone)

• E- field strength at R = vector sum of all fields due to 2ndry Huygen’s 

sources in the plane above the knife edge

Knife Edge Diffraction Geometry, R located in shadowed region

Huygens 2nddrysource

d 2d 1

T

R

h’  

Page 19: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 19/34

19

Electric field strength, E d of knife-edge diffracted wave is given by:

F(v) = Complex Fresnel integral• v = Fresnel-Kirchoff diffraction parameter

• typically evaluated using tables or graphs for given values of v

 E 0 = Free Space Field Strength in the absence of both ground

reflections & knife edge diffraction

(3.59)= F(v) =

dt 

t  j j

v

 

 

 

 

2exp2

1 2 

0 E 

 E d 

Page 20: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 20/34

20

Gd (dB)  = Diffraction Gain due to knife edge presence relative to E 0

• Gd (dB) = 20 log|F(v)| (3.60)

   G   d

   (   d   B   )

 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5

Graphical Evaluation

5

0-5

-10

-15

-20-25

-30 v 

Page 21: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 21/34

21

Table for Gd (dB) 

[0,1]20 log(0.5 e- 0.95v)[-1,0]20 log(0.5-0.62v)

> 2.420 log(0.225/ v)[1, 2.4]20 log(0.4-(0.1184-(0.38-0.1v)

2

)1/2

)

-10

vGd (dB)

L 0 333 (f 900MH ) d 1k d 1k h 25

Page 22: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 22/34

22

e.g. Let: = 0.333 (f c = 900MHz), d1 = 1km, d2 = 1km, h = 25m

2. diffraction loss

• from graph is Gd(dB)  -22dB

• from table Gd(dB)  20 log (0.225/2.74) = - 21.7dB

)10(333.0

)2000(225 )(26

21

21 d d 

d d h 

v = = 2.74

1. Fresnel Diffraction Parameter

3. path length difference between LOS & diffracted rays

m

d d 

d d h625.0

10

2000

2

25

2

6

2

21

212

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

4. Fresnel zone at tip of obstruction (h=25)

• solve for n such that = n /2

• n = 2· 0.625/0.333 = 3.75

• tip of the obstruction completely blocks 1st

3 Fresnel zones

Compute Diffraction Loss at h = 25m

L 0 333 (f 900MH ) d 1k d 1k h 25

Page 23: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 23/34

23

e.g. Let: = 0.333 (f c = 900MHz), d1 = 1km, d2 = 1km, h = 25m

2. diffraction loss from graph is Gd(dB)  1dB

)10(333.0)2000(225 )(26

21

21 d d d d h

 v = = -2.74

1. Fresnel Diffraction Parameter

3. path length difference between LOS & diffracted rays

md d 

d d h625.0

10

2000

2

25

2 6

2

21

212

 

  

 

 

  

     

4. Fresnel zone at tip of the obstruction (h = -25)• solve for n such that = n /2

• n = 2· 0.625/0.333 = 3.75

• tip of the obstruction completely blocks 1st 3 Fresnel zones

• diffraction losses are negligible since obstruction is below LOS path

Compute Diffraction Loss at h = -25m

fi d diff i l

Page 24: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 24/34

24

 f = 900MHz  = 0.333m

= tan-1(75-25/10000) = 0.287o

 = tan-1(75/2000) = 2.15o

 = +  = 2.43o = 0.0424 radians 

find diffraction loss

)(

21

21

d d 

d d 

  v =

from graph, Gd (dB) = -25.5 dB

24.4)12000(333.0)2000)(10000(20424.0  =

find h if Gd (dB) = 6dB

• for Gd (dB) = 6dB v ≈ 0

• then  = 0 and = -  

• and h /2000 = 25/12000 h = 4.16m

 

2km 10km 

 

T

R25m 

 75m 

2km 10km 

100m 

T

25m50m 

R

=0

2km 10km 

 

T

R25m 

  h

Page 25: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 25/34

25

3.7.3 Multiple Knife Edge Diffraction

• with more than one obstruction compute total diffraction loss

(1) replace multiple obstacles with one equivalent obstacle

• use single knife edge model

• oversimplifies problem

• often produces overly optimistic estimates of received signal

strength

(2) wave theory solution for field behind 2 knife edges in series

• Extensions beyond 2 knife edges becomes formidable• Several models simplify and estimate losses from multiple obstacles

3 8 S tt i

Page 26: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 26/34

26

3.8 Scattering

RF waves impinge on rough surface  reflected energy diffuses in all

directions

• e.g. lamp posts, trees  random multipath components

• provides additional RF energy at receiver

• actual received signal in mobile environment often stronger than

predicted by diffraction & reflection models alone

Page 27: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 27/34

27

Reflective Surfaces

• flat surfaces has dimensions >>  

• rough surface often induces specular reflections

• surface roughness often tested using Rayleigh fading criterion

- define critical height for surface protuberances hc for given

incident angle  i 

hc =i

 

 

sin8(3.62)

Let h = maximum protuberance – minimum protuberance 

• if h < hc surface is considered smooth • if h > hc surface is considered rough

h

Page 28: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 28/34

28

stone – dielectric properties• r = 7.51•  = 0.028•  = 0.95

rough stone parameters• h = 12.7cm• h = 2.54

 h = standard deviation of surface height about mean surface height

Page 29: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 29/34

29

For h > hc  reflected E-fields can be solved for rough surfaces using

modified reflection coefficient

  rough =   s     (3.65)

  s =

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 2

sin

exp  

   ih

(3.63)

(i) Ament, assume h is a Gaussian distributed random variable with a

local mean, find   s as:

(ii) Boithias modified scattering coefficient has better correlation

with empirical data

 I 0

is Bessel Function of 1st kind and 0 order

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

2

0

2sin

8sin

8expl

 I  ihih   

 

    s = (3.64)

R fl ti C ffi i t f R h S f

Page 30: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 30/34

30

Reflection Coefficient of Rough Surfaces

(1) polarization (vertical antenna polarization)

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

||

angle of incidence

• ideal smooth surface

• Gaussian Rough Surface• Gaussian Rough Surface (Bessel)

• Measured Data forstone wall h = 12.7cm,  h = 2.54

R fl ti C ffi i t f R h S f

Page 31: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 31/34

31

(2) || polarization (horizontal antenna polarization)

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

| |

angle of incidence

Reflection Coefficient of Rough Surfaces

• ideal smooth surface

• Gaussian Rough Surface

• Gaussian Rough Surface (Bessel)

• Measured Data forstone wall h = 12.7cm,  h = 2.54

3 8 1 Radar Cross Section Model (RCS)

Page 32: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 32/34

32

3.8.1 Radar Cross Section Model (RCS)

• if a large distant objects causes scattering & its location is known

accurately predict scattered signal strengths

• determine signal strength by analysis using

- geometric diffraction theory

- physical optics

• units = m2 

RCS = power density of radio wave incident upon scattering object

power density of signal scattered in direction of the receiver

Urban Mobile Radio

Page 33: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 33/34

33

• d T  = distance of transmitter from the scattering object

• d  R = distance of receiver from the scattering object

• assumes object is in the far field of transmitter & receiver

Pr (dBm) = Pt (dBm) + Gt (dBi) + 20 log() + RCS [dB m2] – 30 log(4) -20 log d T  - 20log d  R

Urban Mobile Radio

Bistatic Radar Equation used to find received power from

scattering in far field region

• describes propagation of wave traveling in free space thatimpinges on distant scattering object

• wave is reradiated in direction of receiver by:

Page 34: Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

8/4/2019 Rap Ch3 Large Scale 2 Part3-1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rap-ch3-large-scale-2-part3-1 34/34

34

RCS can be approximated by surface area of scattering object (m2)

measured in dB relative to 1m2 reference

• may be applied to far-field of both transmitter and receiver

• useful in predicting received power which scatters off large

objects (buildings)

• units = dB m2

• [Sei91] for medium and large buildings, 5-10km

14.1 dB  m2 < RCS < 55.7 dB  m2