rangertm sfa trial - boston scientific · ranger tm sfa trial objective to prove the superior...

2
RANGER TM SFA Trial Objective To prove the superior performance of the Ranger™ paclitaxel-coated PTA balloon catheter (Boston Scientific) for angioplasty for femoropopliteal artery lesions when compared to non-coated balloons. Trial Design Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (2:1 Ranger DCB vs. non-drug-coated balloon). Follow up through 3 years. Key Enrollment Criteria Rutherford 2, 3 or 4 Stenotic, restenotic or occlusive lesions (70% stenosis) in the native non-stented SFA/PPA No prior treatment with drug coated balloons or drug-eluting stents in the treated limb • Lesion length 20 mm and 150 mm 12-month results presented at Charing Cross 2017 Key Baseline Lesion Characteristics # # core lab adjudicated PTA (34) Ranger DCB (71) Target Lesion Length (mm) 60 ± 48 68 ± 46 Reference Vessel Diameter (mm) 4.5 ± 0.83 5 ± 0.89 Percent Diameter Stenosis (%) 82 ± 18 85 ± 15 Total Occlusions (%) 34 34 Freedom from TLR Ranger achieved a 91% Freedom from TLR at 12 months Ranger demonstrated Freedom from TLR superior* to PTA Patency Ranger achieved an 86% primary patency at 12 months (patent by DUS and without reintervention) Ranger demonstrated primary patency superior* to PTA *p=<0.001 log rank test , Kaplan-Meier Analysis Presented by Prof. Scheinert, Charing Cross - 2017 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Primary Patency Rate 0 100 200 300 400 Time since procedure (days) 86% 56% Control DCB *p=0.010 log rank test, Kaplan-Meier Analysis 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Freedom from TLR 0 100 200 300 400 Time since procedure (days) 91% 70% Control DCB 12 Month Outcome

Upload: others

Post on 22-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RANGERTM SFA Trial - Boston Scientific · RANGER TM SFA Trial Objective To prove the superior performance of the Ranger™ paclitaxel-coated PTA balloon catheter (Boston Scientifi

RANGERTM SFA Trial

Objective To prove the superior performance of the Ranger™ paclitaxel-coated PTA balloon catheter (Boston Scientifi c) for angioplasty for femoropopliteal artery lesions when compared to non-coated balloons.

Trial Design Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (2:1 Ranger DCB vs. non-drug-coated balloon). Follow up through 3 years.

Key EnrollmentCriteria

• Rutherford 2, 3 or 4

• Stenotic, restenotic or occlusive lesions (≥70% stenosis) in the native non-stented SFA/PPA

• No prior treatment with drug coated balloons or drug-eluting stents in the treated limb

• Lesion length ≥20 mm and ≤150 mm

12-month results presented at Charing Cross 2017

Key Baseline Lesion

Characteristics#

#core lab adjudicated

PTA (34) Ranger DCB (71)

Target Lesion Length (mm) 60 ± 48 68 ± 46

Reference Vessel Diameter (mm) 4.5 ± 0.83 5 ± 0.89

Percent Diameter Stenosis (%) 82 ± 18 85 ± 15

Total Occlusions (%) 34 34

Freedom from TLR

• Ranger achieved a 91% Freedom from TLR at 12 months

• Ranger demonstrated Freedom from TLR superior* to PTA

Patency • Ranger achieved an 86% primary patency at 12 months (patent by DUS and without reintervention)

• Ranger demonstrated primary patency superior* to PTA

*p=<0.001 log rank test , Kaplan-Meier Analysis

Presented by Prof. Scheinert, Charing Cross - 2017

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

Prim

ary

Pat

ency

Rat

e

0 100 200 300 400Time since procedure (days)

86%

56%

ControlDCB

*p=0.010 log rank test, Kaplan-Meier Analysis

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

Free

dom

fro

m T

LR

0 100 200 300 400Time since procedure (days)

91%

70%

ControlDCB

12 Month Outcome

Page 2: RANGERTM SFA Trial - Boston Scientific · RANGER TM SFA Trial Objective To prove the superior performance of the Ranger™ paclitaxel-coated PTA balloon catheter (Boston Scientifi

www.bostonscientifi c.eu

Control

Control

DCB

DCB

45%

40%

35%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0IN.PACT

SFA

TLR

PACIFIER RANGER SFA

ILLUMENATE BIOLUX-PILEVANT 2 LEVANT 1

7%2%

28%

21%

26%

17%

42%

33%

9%12% 12%

15%

29%

Patient Outcomes

Rutherford score• 84% of Ranger subjects had no or mild symptoms - Rutherford category 0 or 1• Compared to baseline, Ranger and PTA groups both showed improvement in Rutherford score and ABI

BIOLUX-PI - Scheinert D, et al. J Endovasc Ther 2015; 22(1): 14-21., LEVANT 2 - Rosenfi eld K, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015 9;373(2):145-53., PACIFIER - Werk M, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(6):831-840., ILLUMENATE - Schroeder H, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86(2):278-86., LEVANT 1 - Scheinert D, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(1):10-19., IN.PACT SFA - Tepe G, et al. Circulation. 2014 pii: CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011004.

www.bostonscientifi c.eu

Ranger™ Paclitaxel Coated PTA Balloon Catheter is manufactured by Hemoteq AG and distributed by Boston Scientifi c Corporation.All cited trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CAUTION: The law restricts these devices to sale by or on the order of a physician. Indications, contraindications, warnings and instructions for use can be found in the product labeling supplied with each device. Information for the use only in countries with applicable health authority product registrations.Material not intended for use or distribution in France.

PI-467907-AA APR 2017 © 2017 Boston Scientific Corporation or its affiliates. All rights reserved

RANGERTM SFA Trial12-month results presented at Charing Cross 2017

Conclusions • Greater patency rate at 12 months for Ranger DCB than Control (86% vs 56%)• Freedom from TLR greater for Ranger DCB than Control at 12 months (91% vs 70%)• Patients treated with Ranger DCB demonstrated signifi cant improvements in symptoms and

hemodynamics at 12 months – Symptomatic improvement generally similar to Control but with ~1/3 as many revascularizations

Primary Patency at 12 months

from DCB trials of the SFA

aKM Estimates

TLR at 12 months from DCB trials

of the SFA

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0ILLUMENATE

Prim

ary

Pate

ncy

RANGER SFA IN.PACT SFA LEVANT 2 LEVANT 1

89.5%a86.0%a

56.0%a52.4% 56.8%* 55.0%

82.2%73.5%a

67.0%

LEVANT 2 - Rosenfi eld K, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015 9;373(2):145-53., ILLUMENATE - Schroeder H, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86(2):278-86., LEVANT 1 - Scheinert D, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(1):10-19., IN.PACT SFA - Tepe G, et al. Circulation. 2014 pii: CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011004.