ramsey, f.p. - weight ot the value of knowledge, 1990

5
8/13/2019 Ramsey, F.P. - Weight Ot the Value of Knowledge, 1990 http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ramsey-fp-weight-ot-the-value-of-knowledge-1990 1/5 The ritish Society for the Philosophy of Science Weight or the Value of Knowledge Author(s): F. P. Ramsey Source: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 41, No. 1 (Mar., 1990), pp. 1-4 Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/688001 . Accessed: 19/01/2014 13:26 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp  . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].  . Oxford University Press and The British Society for the Philosophy of Science are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 193.54.67.91 on Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:26:13 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Upload: carlos-max

Post on 04-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ramsey, F.P. - Weight Ot the Value of Knowledge, 1990

8/13/2019 Ramsey, F.P. - Weight Ot the Value of Knowledge, 1990

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ramsey-fp-weight-ot-the-value-of-knowledge-1990 1/5

The ritish Society for the Philosophy of Science

Weight or the Value of KnowledgeAuthor(s): F. P. RamseySource: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 41, No. 1 (Mar., 1990), pp. 1-4Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Society for the Philosophy of

ScienceStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/688001 .

Accessed: 19/01/2014 13:26

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

 .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of 

content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms

of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

 .

Oxford University Press and The British Society for the Philosophy of Science are collaborating with JSTOR to

digitize, preserve and extend access to The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 193.54.67.91 on Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:26:13 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 2: Ramsey, F.P. - Weight Ot the Value of Knowledge, 1990

8/13/2019 Ramsey, F.P. - Weight Ot the Value of Knowledge, 1990

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ramsey-fp-weight-ot-the-value-of-knowledge-1990 2/5

Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 41 (1990) 1-4 Printed in Great Britain

Weightor the Value of

Knowledge'F. P. RAMSEY

PREAMBLE

FrankRamsey's ote 'Weight rthe ValueofKnowledge's a gem.In the note

Ramsey roveshatwhenknowledger nformations free tpays nexpectationo

acquiret. Collectingvidencemeans hat one is gamblingwithexpectation utthis is

alwayspreferableo not

gambling,n the

assumptionhatinformations

free(seeRamsay'sigurebelow).Ramseyalsoshowshow muchthe increase n

weights.ForaBayesian, utalso oranon-Bayesian,his sanimportantheoremsince t tellsus whywe shouldcontinue o collectnewevidence,.e.continue omake new observations. everalproofsof this theoremcan be foundin theliteraturelocus lassicuss I.J.Good's rticle On hePrinciplef TotalEvidence'[1967] andthe discussionn L.J.Savage's 1954] TheFoundationfStatistics;nearlynon-Bayesianiscussionftheprobleman befoundnC.S.Peirce's,Noteonthetheory ftheeconomy fresearch'1876) [1958];adiscussion fRamsey'snote canbefound n B.Skyrms 1990] andN.-E.Sahlin 1990]).

Forthose nterestedn

thehistoryofprobabilityheory t is a well-knownactthatRamseynhiscelebratedaperTruth ndProbability'1926)[1990]laid hefoundations f the modern heoryof subjectiveprobability.He showedhowpeople's eliefs nddesiresanbemeasuredyuseof abettingmethod nd hat f anumber f intuitive rinciplesf rationalbehaviour reaccepted, measureusedto representur'degrees fbelief'willsatisfy he laws ofprobability. e was thefirstone to prove he so-calledDutchbooktheorem.However,developinghetheoryof subjective robabilitye also laid the foundations f modernutilitytheoryand decision heory(i.e. twentyyearsbeforeJ. von Neumannand 0.Morgenstern1947] developedheirutility heorynTheoryfGamesndEconomic

Behaviorndalmosthirty earsbeforeL.J.Savage 1954] developedisBayesiandecision heory n TheFoundationsfStatistics). stoundinglynough, his noteshows hatRamsey lsohadaproof fthevalueofcollectingvidence,earsbeforetheworksofGood 1967],Savage 1954] andothers.

I have not alteredRamsey'sunorthodox otation orprobabilities,hichistakenfromJ.M.Keynes'A Treatise nProbability1921] (the word'weight'in thetitleofRamsey'snote alludesto Keynes'book).WhenRamsey,forexample,writes

aK/h=p, this should be read as the probabilityof a and K given h equals p. But

except forthis detail the note readseasily.NILS-ERICAHLIN

1 This note is part of the FrankRamsey Collection,document numbers 005-20-01 and 005-20-03, Archives of ScientificPhilosophy in the Twentieth Century,Hillman Library,University of

Pittsburgh. Quotedby permission of the University of Pittsburgh. All rights reserved.

This content downloaded from 193.54.67.91 on Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:26:13 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 3: Ramsey, F.P. - Weight Ot the Value of Knowledge, 1990

8/13/2019 Ramsey, F.P. - Weight Ot the Value of Knowledge, 1990

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ramsey-fp-weight-ot-the-value-of-knowledge-1990 3/5

2 F. P. Ramsey

Lemma.Supposea is an unknown proposition.4(p) is expectationofadvantagein regard to a if I expect it with probabilityp.

Then (p)> 0.

[Proof.]Suppose xi, x2, ... are variables I can alter by my action.

Goodto me if a=fl (xI, x2 ... )

a=f2 (X, X2.... )

If I expect a with prob[ability]p I act so as to maximize

pf + (1 -p)f2 for fixed given p

i.e. I make p--+ (1 -p) -2=0O r=1, 2 ... (1)ax, ax,

and pd2f1+(1 -p)d2f2<0 (2)

My expectation of advantage

O(p)= pfh + (1 -p)f2 with x's det[ermined]by (1)

I OfOOXrj dp

d'(up)= fl--f2 + p- + (l-p)r

= fi -f2 whatever p.

O (p)d

ffl,-f2

Now differentiating (1) w.r.t. p.

Of1Of2 02f, 02f2x0

s<p+ +(1-p) 0Ox, Ox, axraxs axrax, dp

df, df2 'af, Of2 dxr

Sdp p dax x2rdp

- xd a, + (1 p) af2 >o by 2).Sdpdp axraxs axrax,

r S

Valueof Knowledge

Suppose now I know h and expect a with prob[ability]p.

Expectationof advantage = 4(p).

This content downloaded from 193.54.67.91 on Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:26:13 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 4: Ramsey, F.P. - Weight Ot the Value of Knowledge, 1990

8/13/2019 Ramsey, F.P. - Weight Ot the Value of Knowledge, 1990

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ramsey-fp-weight-ot-the-value-of-knowledge-1990 4/5

Weightor the Valueof Knowledge 3

How muchis it worthwhile ofind out K?

where say K/h= A say y= 1 -

a a-= r, --- = SKh Kh

a aK aK

P.-=

+-= r+sp.h h h

Expectationof advantage if I find out K

= A4(r) + w4(s)

gain = PQ must be [positive] (unless p = r = s, K irrelevant)

r p s

expression for gain

=A).(p+r-p)+p (p+s-p)- 4(p) 2+p/=1, r)l+pjs=p

= (A + p - 1) (p) + {A(r-p) + p(s-p)} I'(p)

,(r-p)2

(s-p)22 2

= {A(r-p)2 + y (S-p)2}4,,(5).

Increase in weight say

= A(r-p)2 +

M(s-p)2= A2(r - S)2 +.22(r-

S)2 = Ai(rT- S)2.

This content downloaded from 193.54.67.91 on Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:26:13 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 5: Ramsey, F.P. - Weight Ot the Value of Knowledge, 1990

8/13/2019 Ramsey, F.P. - Weight Ot the Value of Knowledge, 1990

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ramsey-fp-weight-ot-the-value-of-knowledge-1990 5/5

4 F. P. Ramsey

REFERENCES

GOOD,.J. [1967]: 'On the principleof total evidence', BritishJournalfor hePhilosophy f

Science,17, pp. 319-321.

KEYNES,. M. [1921]: A Treatiseon Probability.Macmillan, London.

PEIRCE,. S. 'Note on the theory of the economy of research' (1876), in Collected apers

ofCharlesSandersPeirce, n A. W. Burks(ed.)HarvardUniversityPress,Cambridge,Mass. Volume 7, 7.140-7.161.

RAMSEY,. P. 'Truth and Probability' (1926) in his PhilosophicalPapers (Ed. D. H.

Mellor) [1990]. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridgeand New York,pp. 52-

94.

SAHLIN, .-E. [1990]: The Philosophyof F. P. Ramsey. Cambridge University Press,

forthcoming, Cambridge,Chapter 1.

SAVAGE, L.J. [1954]: The Foundations f Statistics.Wiley, New York.

SKYRMS,. [1990]: TheDynamicsof Rational Deliberation.Harvard University Press,

forthcoming, Chapter4.

VONNEUMANN, .and MORGENSTERN,. [1947]: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior,

2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

This content downloaded from 193.54.67.91 on Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:26:13 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions