raj mittra*, jonathan bringuier * and nadar farahat**
DESCRIPTION
A Novel Approach To Constructing The Green’s Function for Layered Media and Its Application to MMIC, RFIC, and EMC Problems. Raj Mittra*, Jonathan Bringuier * and Nadar Farahat** *Electromagnetic Communication Laboratory, Penn State **2Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
A Novel Approach To Constructing The Green’s Function for Layered Media and Its Application to MMIC, RFIC, and EMC Problems
Raj Mittra*, Jonathan Bringuier * and Nadar Farahat***Electromagnetic Communication Laboratory, Penn State**2Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico P.O. box 192017 San Juan, PR 00919
TransmitAntenna
Receive Antenna
Space waves
Surface waves
z
Layered ModelFor human body
Canonical Geometry for Conformal Antennas
Green’s function approach using FDTD
Methodology Outline:
1) Simulate Antenna structure in isolation to obtain terminal parameters and fields on an aperture just above the conformal antenna. This aperture distribution will be treated as equivalent sources J and M in the forgoing anaylsis. We assume that this information can either be obtained or given a priori.
2) Using BOR-FDTD, simulate horizontal electric and magnetic ideal dipole sources resting on the human body layered model to estimate
the Green’s function of the media.
3) Since coupling distances can reach a large number of wavelengths, we use a Prony analysis of the fields at distances from the source where only surface waves are sustained and higher order behavior is neglible.
4) We break up the obtained transmitting aperture into a discrete number of ideal dipole sources (both magnetic and electric) and apply
superposition to an arbitrary receive aperture size.
5) Using the fields obtained on the receive aperture, we can apply the reaction concept to calculate the coupling.
TransmitAntenna
Receive Antenna
Space waves
Surface waves
z
Layered ModelFor human body
Simulating Horizontal Electric dipoles (HED) in FDTD
HED
momentdipoleIl _
z
y
x
z
y
x
0
0
0
sincos
sin
cos
EEEE
EE
EE
sourcesourcesourcex
source
source
Ex
Theoretical BOR-FDTD implementation
2
32
2
32
1
4sin
1
0
0
0
1
4sin
1
1
4cos
2
2
jIleH
H
H
E
jIle
jE
jIle
jE
rfor
j
z
z
j
j
Theory
2
32
2
32
1
4sin
1
0
0
0
1
4sin
1
1
4cos
2
2
jIleH
H
H
E
jIle
jE
jIle
jE
rfor
j
z
z
j
j
Theory
z
y
x
0
0
0
sincos
sin
cos
EEEE
EE
EE
sourcesourcesourcex
source
source
Ex
Normalizationrequired
2
32
2
32
1
4sin
1
0
0
0
1
4sin
1
1
4cos
2
2
jIleH
H
H
E
jIle
jE
jIle
jE
rfor
j
z
z
j
j
Theory
z
y
x
0
0
0
sincos
sin
cos
EEEE
EE
EE
sourcesourcesourcex
source
source
Ex
Normalizationrequired
Normalizing the results of the BOR-FDTD with the dipole moment calculated, the results are thefields generated by an ideal dipole with unit moment in BOR-FDTD. Subsequent simulations (specific to the simulation parameters mentioned above) for different material distributions in the computation domain must be normalized by this factor.
Note: There is a near perfect agreement, both in magnitude and phase, between the normalized fields from FDTD and the Theoretical expressions for the ideal dipole with a unit moment.
Prony extrapolation
FieldMagnitude
)(f
)(g)()( 0 gf
0
Higher order terms negligible.Only propagating surface wavesRemain.
FDTD result
Sample regionData used in Prony anaylsis
)(ˆ
ˆ
0ˆ)(
ˆ)(
n
n
kN
nn
kN
nn
eAf
eAg
Prony method0 Therefore, the extrapolation will be valid for values of
)(f
0
Sample regionExtrapolation region
FDTD result
Prony estimation for Ephi of ideal HED
Note: 5th order Prony estimation was used but only one term dominates which corresponds to the surface wave.
Sample region
Extrapolation region
FDTDdata
End of FDTD simulation
RR
FDTD gridw/ aperturedistribution
At large separation distancesWe can treat the aperture meshAs a planar array.Use Prony results:
patternelementeC
eAC
Let
jk
jAAA
eAE
n
n
n
j
nn
nn
nnn
irn
k
nn
_)(ˆ
ˆ)(ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ)(
)(
)(
)(ˆ
0
0
0
Transmitting Aperture approximated by a discrete number of ideal dipole sources
Ideal dipole source
Using Array Theory, the resulting expression for the any of thefield components is:
AF with arbitrary spacing and weigting
cos)(sin)()( ˆ)(ˆsin
cos),( 0 mDj
n
L
l
L
m
lDjml
jn
xn
y xynn eeSeCF
RR
FDTD gridw/ aperturedistribution
At large separation distancesWe can treat the aperture meshAs a planar array.
Ideal dipole source
transmit
receive
(a) FDTD generated mesh (196 x 114 x 105 matrix)
(b) Human torso 3D CT scan data with 1 mm cubic voxel resolution.
Human Body composite 3 layer model: skin, fat, muscle.
Simulation of two square patchs resting on the human body torso
),( 00 yx
R
R
FDTD gridw/ aperturedistribution
Transmit Aperture grid:
dx=dy=7.1429e-005
Number of cells=21x21FDTD Receive grid
y
x
22
y
x
Sinusiodal aperture distribution along x
21
)9.0,9.0(),( 00 mmyx Receive Aperture grid:
dx=dy=7.1429e-005
Number of cells=21x2122
21
TransmitAntenna
Receive Antenna
Space waves
Surface waves
z
Layered ModelFor human body
Application of method to multilayer model for human body
z
Region 3
Region 2
Region 1
Observation plane
Region 1: Skin epsr=46.7 sigma=0.69 height=1/6*lambda
Region 3: Muscle epsr=58.8 sigma=0.84 height=infinite half plane
Region 2: Fat epsr=11.6 sigma=0.08 height=1/6*lambda
PML
Surface wave Surface wave
Jx
Sample Field used for Prony
BOR result (blue)
Sample for Prony (red)
Bn_Ephi=0.239623547159758E+03alphan_Ephi=0.178558442838438E+02A_Ephi= -0.572584898018054E+01-j*0.120430818055098E+01
Bn_Erho=0.210600035140825E+03alphan_Erho=0.458742417351554E+01A_Erho=0.677026493838244E+03+j*0.567776370035642E+03
Bn_Ez=0.209850321425741E+03alphan_Ez=0.427832694143299E+01A_Ez=-0.399837251051164E+04 +j*0.314069187401468E+04
Bn_Hphi=0.210256687643315E+03alphan_Hphi=0.445572941127469E+01A_Hphi= 0.101106161268781E+02 +j*0.899268946273489E+01
Bn_Hrho=0.225717493571084E+03alphan_Hrho=0.832370230201144E+0A_Hrho=-0.749370952261226E-01 +j*0.132739082925593E+00
Bn_Hz=0.216866491191321E+03alphan_Hz=0.242139604271817E+02A_Hz=-0.481638724981019E-01 -j*0.654421958326780E-01
nnn
irn
k
nn
jk
jAAA
eAE n
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ)( )(ˆ0
Prony results
source Ex Ey
Hx Hy
yx
Field Magnitudes on the receive aperture
TransmitAntenna
Receive Antenna
Space waves
Surface waves
z
Layered ModelFor human body
Calculation of coupling between 64 element X-band and 64 element Ku-band arrays separated by 40 wavelengths
Using the Green’s function approach with the convolution of sources on the on the transmitting X-band array we can obtain the fields induced on the defined aperture of Ku-band the receiving array.
Both arrays are separated by 40 free-space wavelengths with a RAM material having relative permittivity of 3.1, conductivity of 0.134 and height of ½ inch (1.27 cm).
TransmitAntenna
Receive Antenna
Space waves
Surface waves
z
RAM
X-bandArray
All elements excited
Ku-band Array
Single element excited
40 lambda
8.64 lambda
8.16 lambda
11.52 lambda
11.04 lambda
Ex for X-band spiral array
Ex for Ku-band single active element
Ex magnitude on Ku-band aperture Hy magnitude on Ku-band aperture
Index x-axisIn
dex
y-
axis
Index x-axis
Ind
ex y
-ax
is
TransmitAperture
Receive Aperture
Space waves
Surface waves
z
RAM
Hy phase on Ku-band apertureEx phase on Ku-band aperture
From non-uniform grid
Index x-axis
Ind
ex y
-ax
is Ind
ex y
-ax
isIndex x-axis
Using the fields obtained on the receive aperture and the source information, we can apply the reaction concept to calculate the coupling.
For coupling calculations we must have the isolated Port characteristics of the transmitting and receiving antennas. The coupling can be directly computed using the reaction information on the aperture.
Reaction Calculation:
S
S
sdMHJE
sdMHJE
)(1,2
)(2,1
1212
2121
Conclusion Direct simulation of antennas mounted on the human body can be done if
the computing resources are available. However, such simulations may not be feasible if computational power is limited.
The Green’s function approach using BOR-FDTD has many distinct advantages:
1) The computational domain can be reduced from 3D to 2D by exploiting
azimuthal symmetry.
2) Fields can be extrapolated to very large distances using Prony’s method.
3) The total fields on a receiving aperture can be obtained by simple
superposition of equivalent sources on the transmitting aperture.
4) Coupling can be directly calculated using the Reaction Theorem.
Reference A. Alomainy, Y. Hao, X. Hu, C.G. Parini, P.S. Hall “UWB on-body radio propagation
and system modelling for wireless body-centric networks.”IEE Proc.-Commun, Vol 153 No. 1, February 2006
M.R. Kamarudan, Y.I. Nechayev, P.S. Hall “Performance of antennas in the on-bodyenviornment.” Second International Symposium, Year:19-20 Oct. 1998, Page(s):116-122
Jaehoon Kim, Yahya Rahmat-Samii “Implanted antennas inside a human body: simulationsdesign, and characterization.” IEEE MTT, Vol.52, No. 8, August 2004
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Homepage : www.fcc.gov
Wideband slot antennas for wireless communications, Yeo, J.; Lee, Y.; Mittra, R.; Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, IEE Proceedings-Volume 151, Issue 4, 15 Aug. 2004 Page(s):351 - 355
Design of a wideband planar volcano-smoke slot antenna (PVSA) for wireless communications, Junho Yeo; Yoonjae Lee; Mittra, R.; Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 2003. IEEE Volume 2, 22-27 June 2003 Page(s):655 - 658 vol.2
Study of CPW-fed circular disc monopole antenna for ultra wideband applications, Liang, J.; Guo, L.; Chiau, C.C.; Chen, X.; Parini, C.G.; Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, IEE Proceedings- 9 Dec. 2005 Page(s):520 – 526
Printed circular disc monopole antenna for ultra-wideband applications, Liang, J.; Chiau, C.C.; Chen, X.; Parini, C.G.; Electronics Letters, Volume 40, Issue 20, 30 Sept. 2004 Page(s):1246 – 1247
Modeling Of Interaction Between Body-mounted Antennas, Raj Mittra; Jonathan Bringuier; Kyungho Yoo; Joe Wiart; submitted to EuCAP’06