raising standards performance review november 2008
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Raising Standards For Academic Success
Glenn Hills Middle School
Faculty Meeting 2008
Glenn H. Andrews, PrincipalKimberly Davis, Assistant
PrincipalGordon Holley, Assistant
Principal
To provide academic and social development for all students by
ensuring a positive experience to better prepare them for success at the
high school level.
Vision
Mission
![Page 2: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Leadership Standard (1): The principal and school administrators provide leadership that reinforces a commitment to high expectations for student achievement while promoting the school as a true community of learning.
Raising Standards For Academic Success
![Page 3: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Leadership Standard (L 4.3) School Leadership
Team Data-Driven
Raising Standards For Academic Success
![Page 4: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Planning & Organization Standard (1): A current school vision and mission are the basis for all aspects of continuous improvement.
All stakeholders within the learning community have achieved consensus regarding their shared sense of vision and mission, which serves as the basis for all facets of the continuous improvement process.
![Page 5: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Framework Assessment Data
Results & Review
Gordon Holley, Assistant Principal
![Page 6: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Student Retention Data
Summary & Review
Glenn H. Andrews, PrincipalGordon Holley, Assistant
PrincipalDarryl Dunn, Graduation Coach
![Page 7: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Assessment Standard (1): A cohesive and comprehensive system is in place to ensure that all administrators and instructional personnel use assessment data to design and adjust instruction to maximize student achievement.
Raising Standards For Academic Success
![Page 8: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Variables Affecting Graduation Rates
EthnicitySocial Economic Demographics
# of Retention# Passed CRCT/Failed Content# Passed Content/Failed CRCT
# of Elementary School Attended# of Absences
Variables Affecting Graduation Rates
Ethnicity# of Retentions
Ages# Failed CRCT/Passed Content# Failed Content/Passed CRCT
# of Absences
Variables Affecting Graduation Rates
Ethnicity# of Retentions Prior to 9th Grade
Ages @ Ninth GradeFailed EOCT
Fee
der
Pat
tern
s
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
![Page 9: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Retention Data128 Student were retained prior to middle
school.103 retained students receive free lunch 80%7 retained students receive reduced lunch 6%18 retained students pay for lunch 14%
46 8th grade students41 7th grade students41 6th grade students
![Page 10: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Retention Data78 Black Males 61%4 White Males 3%44 Black Females 34%2 White Females 1.5%2 Hispanic Females 1.5 %1 Asian Female .78%
![Page 11: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Retention Data73 passed the CRCT for three years in a row
57% 6th through 8th grade Lexile scores 665-110023 600-69930 700-79921 800-89916 900-9991 1000-10993 1100+
![Page 12: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Student w/Disabilities Summary Report
Student body 704 SWD 6666/704*100= 9.375 % of the student body is
SWD# of Students who have been retained 128% of student body 18.18 %# of retained students who are SWD = 21% of SWDS retained 21/66*100 31.81%SLD 6 OHI 3 MIID 3 EBD 7 AUT 2
![Page 13: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Retention SummaryMajority of students were retained once or
twice
They were retained in 1st through 3rd grade mostly
The biggest trend was the higher the number of elementary schools students attended the higher chance of retention.
Students attended 3-6 schools on average.
![Page 14: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Discipline Referral Review
Glenn H. Andrews, PrincipalGordon Holley, Assistant Principal
![Page 15: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Discipline Referrals to dateDiscipline 2008-2009
0
95136
267
359
497
572
688747
812
0 10 28 52 63 75
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
11-Aug
18-Aug
25-Aug
1-Sep
8-Sep
15-Sep
22-Sep
29-Sep
6-Oct
13-Oct
20-Oct
27-Oct
3-Nov
10-Nov
17-Nov
24-Nov
1-Dec
8-Dec
15-Dec
22-Dec
29-Dec
Refe
rral
s
2007-2008 0 95 136 267 359 497 572 688 747 812
2008-2009 0 10 28 52 63 75
11-Aug 31-Aug 11-Sep 30-Sep 11-Oct 31-Oct 11-Nov 30-Nov 11-Dec 31-Dec
![Page 16: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Problem Behavior Report
![Page 17: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Referrals by Grade Level
![Page 18: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Location of Referrals
![Page 19: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Triangle
![Page 20: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Student Attendance 08/11/2008 through 10/18/2008 Attendance Frequency: Full-day Absent Half-day Absent Tardy Number % Total Number % Total Number % Total Monday 177 17.4 1 2.3 135 22.8 Tuesday 217 21.4 6 13.9 135 22.8 Wednesday 196 19.3 18 41.8 111 18.7 Thursday 180 17.7 17 39.5 107 18.1 Friday 243 23.9 1 2.3 103 17.4 ------------------ ------------------ ----------------- Totals 1,013 100.0 43 100.0 591 100.0
![Page 21: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Number of Students with Absences
# Days Absent Tardy
1.0 154 124 2.0 92 52 3.0 39 27 4.0 38 13 5.0 22 9 6.0 8 8 7.0 2 4 8.0 8 2 9.0 1 3 10.0 5 none 11.0 1 1 12.0 2 2 16.0 1 1 17.0 1 none 20.0 1 none 25.0 1 none
![Page 22: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Protocols
Glenn H. Andrews, PrincipalKimberly Davis, Assistant Principal
Grade Level Teams
Glenn Hills Middle School
![Page 23: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Pyramids of InterventionProtocols
Gordon Holley, Assistant Principal
![Page 24: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
![Page 29: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Raising Standard Rollout
Instructional Framework
Kimberly Davis, Assistant Principal
Elizabeth Arnette, ELA CoachLarina Thomas, Math Coach
![Page 31: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Team Sick Personal Professional Staff Development
Total
Clemson 10 3 4 4.5 21.5GA Southern
6 9.5 15.5Augusta State
43 4 47SC State 16 2 6 24Paine 11.5 2 6.5 20Tuskegee 5 1 5 11GA Tech 5.5 4 2 5 16.5UGA 9 2.5 11.5U of Tennessee
5 3 2 7.5 17.5Connections
26.5 7 2 4 39.5Total 137 20 12 53.5 224.75
![Page 32: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Grade Level Total # of Students
Total # of Honor
Students
% of Totals
6th Grade 226 Students
38 Students
17%
7th Grade 216 Students
30 Students
14%
8th Grade 264 Students
39 Students
15%
Totals 706 Students
107 Students
15%15% of total student population made the (A) or (AB) honor roll.
![Page 33: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Teams Names Number of F’s
Clemson University 15 Total
Georgia Southern 19 Total
Paine College 17 Total
SC State University 31 Total
Augusta State 42 Total
Tuskegee University 71 Total
Univ. of Tennessee 42 Total
Georgia Tech. 11 Total
University of Georgia 52 Total
Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!
![Page 34: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Grade Levels
Total # of Students
Total # of Failures
% of Totals
6th Grade 226 51 Total 22%
7th Grade 216 144 Total 67%
8th Grade 264 105 Total 38%
Totals 706 300 42%
42% of total student population has one or more (F)’s for the first nine weeks grading period.
Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!
![Page 35: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
SPED FAILURE LIST-1st Nine Weeks
GRADE TEAM LAST NAME LANG
ARTS MATH SCIENCE S. S. Total
6 Student 1 X X X (40%) x 4
6 Student 2 (50%) x 1
7 Student 3 X X (35%) 2
7 Student 4 X x X (35%) X 4
7 Student 5 X X (65%) 2
7 Student 6 X X (90%) 2
7 Student 7 X ( 25%) X 2
7 Student 8 X 1
7 Student 9 X X (15%) X 3
7 Student 10 X 1
7 Student 11 X X (75%) 2
7 Student 12 X (45%) 1
8 Student 13 X 1
8 Student 14 X X 2
8 Student 15 X 1
8 Student 16 X 1
![Page 36: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
6th Grade Standards Blitz
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Teachers
Perc
en
tag
e O
bserv
ed
9/12/08
10/15/08
![Page 37: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
7th Grade Standards Blitz
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Teachers
Perc
en
tag
e O
bserv
ed
9/12/08
10/15/08
![Page 38: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
8th Grade Standards Blitz
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Rollins
Jone
sSta
rk
Moo
re
Peter
son
& Glov
er
Faulk
Scott
& Mah
oney
Carpe
nter
Gordo
n
Sande
rs
Bowm
an
Forsto
n
Teachers
Per
cen
tag
e O
bse
rved
9/12/08
10/15/08
![Page 39: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070321/558e7e7d1a28ab9f0b8b4576/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Evaluation & Documentation
Professional Growth Plans
Glenn H. Andrews, PrincipalKimberly Davis, Assistant
principal