rahbar-rastegar-comparison of aging methods for ......short title; author(s), date project overview...

20
Comparison of Different Laboratory Aging Methods for Performance Evaluations Reyhaneh Rahbar-Rastegar Jo Sias Daniel and Eshan V. Dave NESMEA 2017 Annual Meeting October 18, 2017 Hartford, CT

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Comparison of Different Laboratory Aging Methods for Performance Evaluations

    Reyhaneh Rahbar-RastegarJo Sias Daniel and Eshan V. Dave

    NESMEA 2017 Annual MeetingOctober 18, 2017

    Hartford, CT

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Aging

    § Hot mix asphalt pavements undergo aging during mixing and compaction, and over the service life.

    • Short term aging (mixing and compaction)• Long term aging (pavement service life)

    § Aging effects:

    § Increase of stiffness§ Decrease of relaxation More cracking susceptibility§ Increase of brittleness

    2

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Project Overview

    § NHDOT Project 26962O § 10 plant mixed, lab compacted mixtures

    § PG 58-28, PG 52-34§ 12.5 and 19 mm NMAS§ 20 and 30% RAP, RAP/RAS

    § Binder testing § Mixture testing

    § To investigate how mixtures linear viscoelastic (LVE), fracture, and

    fatigue properties change with different aging levels.

    § To investigate impact of different long term lab conditioning

    protocols.

    3

    Objectives

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Laboratory AgingüShort-term aging condition üLong-term aging condition

    • 5 days, 85 ℃ for compacted samples (AASHTO R30)

    • 5 days, 95 ℃, loose mix (NCHRP 9-54 project)

    • 12 days, 95 ℃, loose mix (NCHRP 9-54 project)

    • 24-hour, 135 ℃, loose mix (Asphalt Institute)

    4

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Mixture Testing and Parameters§ Complex Modulus Testing (AASHTO TP-79)

    § ǀE*ǀ and d master curve

    § Black Space Diagram

    § Higher E* and lower dè more potential to cracking

    § Mixture Glover-Rowe !∗($%& '))

    *+,'

    (Mensching, et al., 2016)

    at 15 ℃ and 0.005 rad/s

    Higher mixture G-R è more cracking susceptibility

    5

    100

    1000

    10000

    100000

    5 15 25 35 45

    Dyn

    amic

    Mod

    ulus

    (M

    Pa)

    Phase Angle (Degrees)

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    LVE Characteristics

    § Higher dynamic modulus and lower phase angle for LTOA mixtures.

    § Change of phase angle master curve shape; horizontal and vertical shift in peak phase angle

    6

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    LVE Characteristics

    § Higher stiffness for LTOA mixtures (difference varies between 1 to 6 times).

    § Lower relaxation at high and intermediate freq. and higher relaxation at low freq. for LTOA mixes.

    7

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Black Space Diagram

    § For same level of thermal stress, relaxation capabilities of asphalt mixtures would diminish with increasing aging levels.

    8

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Mixture G-R Parameter

    § Increase of the ratio in higher aging levels.§ 12 days (95 ℃) and 24 hr. (135 ℃) have similar

    values.

    9

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Mixture Testing and Parameters§ Uniaxial Fatigue Testing

    • Based on Simplified Viscoelastic Continuum Damage approach (AASHTO TP 107)

    • Damage Characteristics Curve (C – S)

    • Fatigue Failure Criterion (GR – Nf)

    • Nf @ GR=100

    § GR : The rate of change of the averaged released pseudo strain energy (per cycle) throughout the entire history of the test.

    10

    1

    10

    100

    1000

    1000 10000 100000 1000000

    GR

    Number of cycles (Nf)

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000

    C (

    Pseu

    do S

    tiffn

    ess)

    S (Damage)

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Fatigue Properties (C-S)

    11

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000

    C*(Psuedo*Stiffness)

    S*(Damage)

    20%*RAP*Mixtures

    STOA,*52E3424*hr.*135C,*52E3412*days,*95C,*52E345*days,*95C,*52E34STOA,*58E2824*hr.*135C,*58E2812*days,*95C,*58E28

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000

    C*(Psuedo*Stiffness)

    S*(Damage)

    20%*RAP/RAS*Mixtures

    STOA,*52F3424*hr.*135C,*52F3412*days,*95C,*52F345*days,*95C,*52F34STOA,*58F2824*hr.*135C,*58F2812*days,*95C,*58F285*days,*95C,*58F28

    § Similar integrity for STOA and 5 days LTOA, but high levels of aging make significant difference.

    § Similar C-S curves for PG 58-28 and PG 52-34 mixtures.

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Mixture Testing and Parameters§ Disk-Shaped Compact Tension (DCT) Test (ASTM D7313-13)§ Semi-Circular Bend (SCB) Test (AASHTO TP 124)

    • Fracture Energy (Gf = work / fracture surface area)

    • Flexibility Index (FI = Gf / Slope at inflection point)

    • Fracture Strain Tolerance (FST = Gf / Fracture strength)

    12

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    0 2 4 6 8

    Load

    (kN

    )

    Displacement (mm)

    Post Peak Slope

    Area under the curve = Work

    PeakLoad(usedtocalculatefracturestrength,St)

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Fracture Properties, FST=(Gf/Sf)

    § Higher FST for 5 days aging than 12 days.§ 24 hr. have higher FST than 12 days for RAP/RAS

    mixtures.

    13

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Conclusion§ All levels of long term aging have made a significant

    increase on LVE properties (ǀE*ǀ and δ)

    § 24 hour (135 ℃) and 12 days (95 ℃) aging levels create similar effects on LVE properties, but not on fatigue and fracture properties.

    § Cracking resistance (FST) decrease as the aging level changes from 5 days to 12 days, but there is not an evident trend between the fracture properties of 24 hour and 12 days.

    § This study supports 12 days at 95 ℃ aging protocol on basis of fracture test results.

    14

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Future Work

    § Expand the data base, additional mixtures from

    different locations of country.

    § Testing and analysis of cores that have been aged in

    the field.

    § Extend this research to develop an aging prediction

    model.

    § Develop new thresholds for available cracking

    parameters with the effect of aging.

    15

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Acknowledgement

    § New Hampshire Department of Transportation

    § Pike Industries, Inc.

    § UNH Asphalt Research Group

    16

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Thank you!any questions?

    Reyhaneh RahbarEmail: [email protected]

    Tel: 765-494-7289

    17

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Mixture Testing and Parameters

    §Shape parameters

    • E* master curve• Sigmoidal model: log 𝐸∗ = 𝛿 + 5

    6789:;(?)

    • (- 𝛽/ 𝛾) vs. (𝛾)

    • d master curve

    • Lorentzian model: 𝛿 = B.D)

    (E%F(G)HI))7D)

    • (c) vs. (a)

    18

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    1.E-05 1.E-03 1.E-01 1.E+01 1.E+03 1.E+05

    Phase

    Angl

    e (d

    egre

    es)

    Reduced Frequency (Hz)

    STOA

    LTOA

    Related to c

    ∆a

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Shape Parameters

    19

    § The evolution of shape parameters with aging.§ More variation in 24 hr., 135∘C aged mixtures.

  • Short title; Author(s), Date

    Fracture Properties, FI (SCB)

    20