7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

1/15

RADIOGRAPHICDETECTION OF

APPROXIMAL CARIES: A

COMPARISON OF

DENTAL FILMS ANDDIGITAL IMAGING

SYSTEMS

Teguh Budiarto

04101004074

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

2/15

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

3/15

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

4/15

(A) VISUALIX, 684X456 PIXELS.

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

5/15

(B) SIDEXIS, 660X412 PIXELS.

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

6/15

(C) DIGORA, 560X416 PIXELS.

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

7/15

(D) DENOPTIX (300 D.P.I.), 533X377

PIXELS.

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

8/15

(E) DENOPTIX (600 D.P.I.), 1064X752

PIXELS.

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

9/15

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

10/15

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

11/15

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

12/15

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

13/15

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

14/15

KESIMPULAN

sistem radiografi baik konvensional dan digital

tidak memiliki perbedaan yang signifikan pada

tingkat akurasi diagnostik.

Yang mempengaruhi tingkat akurasi diagnostik

adalah pengamat, perbedaan ini disebabkan oleh

oleh perbedaan pengalaman, pelatihan atau

persepsi visual.

Para pengamat lebihunderestimeteddalam

mendiagnosis keparahan karies proksimal.Ahliradiologi secara signifikan lebih baik daripada

dokter umum tidak tergantung dariimaging

modalityyang dihasilkan.

7/26/2019 Radiographic Detection of Approximal Caries

15/15

TERIMA KASIH