radio galaxies part 2
DESCRIPTION
Radio Galaxies Part 2. A prototypical radio galaxy. Hot-spots. Core. Jets. Lobes. Any size: from pc to Mpc First order similar radio morphology (but differences depending on radio power, optical luminosity & orientation) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Radio Galaxies Part 2
A prototypical radio galaxy
Any size: from pc to Mpc First order similar radio morphology (but differences depending on radio power, optical luminosity & orientation) Typical radio power 1023 to 1028 W/Hz
Lobes
Core
JetsHot-spots
The morphology of a radio galaxy may depend ondifferent parameters:
- radio power (related to the power of the AGN?) - orientation of the radio emission - intrinsic differences in the (nuclear regions of) host galaxy - environment
….but radio galaxies are not all the same!
The morphology does not depend on size!
~20 pc
~200 kpc
Effects of the interactionwith the environment
Effects of age
Two main flavors
Fanaroff and Riley type I and II
Edge-brightenedhigh radio power
Edge-darkenedlower radio power
FRI FRII
Jets Large opening angle low Mach number(but not on small scales)
Very collimatedhigh Mach number(relativistic on small scales)Magnetic Field Perpendicular
to the jet Parallel to the jet
Hot-spot -- Yes
Lobes Plume-like Backflow
Spectral index in the Lobes
Steeper away from the nucleus
Steeper toward the nucleus (from hot-spots)
o The reason(s) for these differences is not completely clear; likely related to the nuclear regions.o Differences are seen also in other wavebands.o Possibly also environment: lower-power radio galaxies tend to be in clusters
Two flavors also for the jets: supersonic and highly collimated subsonic with entrainment
This can explain the presence of
hot-spots and the collimation of the
jets.
Radio jets
Simulations of an high Mach number radio jet(velocity of the plasma >> sound speed)
Movie M = 10
Movie hot-spot
What makes the difference?
Intrinsic differences in the nuclear regions?
Accretion occurring at low rate and/or radiative efficiency?
No thick tori?
Well known dichotomy: low vs high power radio galaxies
Differences not only in the radio WHY?
Also important: the resolution of the observations!
Importance of observations at different resolution
M87radio emission at differentfrequencies and resolutions
Often the radio emission is more symmetric on the large scale and asymmetric on the small scale
core
The core is defined based on the spectral index: flat ( ~ 0)
[to find which component is the radio core is not always easy:free-free absorption can complicate the story!]
What are the characteristics of the jets close to the AGN?
Discovered (around 1970-80) in powerful radio galaxies and quasars: apparent change (on the VLBI scale) in the structure of some sources during a period of few months. the velocities appear superluminal the components of the velocities and direction remain constant there are no observed “contractions” a flux outburst seems to be associated with the appearance of new components
Case of 3C273 (quasar) apparent velocity ~10c
Superluminal motions
These projection effects explain: the apparent superluminal motion the asymmetry between the two jets, also the flux of the approaching and receding components are affected by projection
These are among the methods used to find out the orientation of a source
)cos1/(sin vv
Not all the jets are superluminal
VLBI observations of Centaurus A (between 1991 and 1996)
Apparent motion subluminal speed ~ 0.1c
However this does not seem to be characteristics common to all lower power (Fanaroff-Riley I) radio galaxies
Apparent motionof the componentsbetween 4 and 6 cbut very complex.
3C120
The structure can be complicated, perhaps from the interaction with the inter-stellar medium New components can be seen to appear
Going very close to the BHto see how the collimation of the jet works.
rapid broadening of the jet opening angle as the core is approached on scale below 1 mas (0.1 pc).
~ 1 mas = 0.071 pc
43 GHz VLBI
M 87
The jet does not seem to reach a complete collimation until a distance of many tens of Schwarzschild radii (escape velocity = c)
jet emanating from the accretion disk, not yet collimated
Optical Jets
some radio jets have an optical counter-part
few more cases found by HST (high resolution is needed)
the more the jet is “beamed” toward us the more is likely we see the optical part
Origin of the optical emission:likely an extension of the synchrotron spectrum.Lifetime of the electrons very short Acceleration mechanisms need to be present.
Optical jet in M87 (NGC 4486 in Virgo)
M87Radio
Optical
X-ray
X-ray +optical contours
The new X-ray satellite Chandra has shown that many radio jet have also an X-ray counterpart
Jets in optical and X-ray
opticalX-ray
Almost identical morphology from the radio to X-ray band:the optical, UV and X-ray data (and spectral indices) are consistent with synchrotron emission
Other possibility : inverse Compton effect
Relativistic electrons in a radiation field. Because of the interaction with the photons, the electrons loose energy while the outcome are photons with higher energy. This interaction can take place between the relativistic electron producing the radio emission and either the radio photons or the photons from the cosmic micro-wave background.
The electrons must have high (107) and very short life-time (<<yrs)
Radio and X-rayof the jet in Centaurus A
Very detailed image, scale of the arcsec (~18 pc). Small offset between the radio and X-ray emission.The X-ray trace the regions where the electrons with high are accelerated NOW.
pink = radio blue = X-ray
HST, Chandra, Merlin
3C273 (quasar)
An other well studied case.
o Also radio hot-spots are now found to have optical and X-ray counter-parts
A look at the nuclear regions
Many indications that the view of the central regions is “orientation dependent: superluminal motion of the jets broad optical lines free-free absorption
Evidence for a circum-nuclear disk/torus
Seyfert galaxy NGC4258(from water masers)
Evidence of absorption from the X-ray spectra(column density above 1024 cm-2)
Evidence of obscuring “torus”from the optical broad line observed in polarized lightin narrow-line radio galaxies
The inner edge of the “torus” (<0.3 pc) is likely to be completely ionized from the radiation from the AGN.The presence of this ionized medium will cause “free-free” absorption of the radio emissionfrom the nuclear radio components.This effect is prominent at longer wavelengths.
Presence of ionized gas
Component that “appears” only at high frequency(absorbed at lower frequencies) REAL NUCLEUS!?!
Neutral hydrogen in the nuclear regions
From the absorption, the column density of the neutral hydrogen can be derived.Typical numbers are 1020 to 1021 cm-2
VLBI data
HST image
Structure of the circumnuclear torus 1946+708 Mrk 231
Nuclear dust/gas disks very common in radio galaxies (as we will see tomorrow!)
These characteristics (different morphologies, superluminal motions, presence of nuclear tori etc.) are extremely important when we will try to “unify” different type of AGN.
A key parameter is the orientation of the jets with respect to the line-of-sight.