r. garoby for the liu project team

R. Garoby for the LIU Project Team

Brainstorming - 24/06/2011

Estimated beam characteristicsfrom the upgraded injectors

• Planned actions• Status of investigations• Estimated beam characteristics• Planning• Summary

R.G. 3 Brainstorming – 24/06/2011

To increase performance Brightness ä

Þ Increase injection energy in the PSB from 50 to 160 MeV, Linac4 (160 MeV H-) to replace Linac2 (50 MeV H+)

Þ Increase injection energy in the PS from 1.4 to 2 GeV, increasing the field in the PSB magnets, replacing power supply and changing transfer equipment

Þ Upgrade the PSB , PS and SPS to make them capable to accelerate and manipulate a higher brightness beam (feedbacks, cures against electron clouds, hardware modifications to reduce impedance…)

To increase reliability and lifetime (until ~2030!)(tightly linked with consolidation)

Þ Upgrade/replace ageing equipment (power supplies, magnets, RF…)Þ Procure sparesÞ Improve radioprotection measures (shielding, ventilation…)

Principles of action


A. Guerrero§ H. Bartosik

Present focus: debugging of transverse emittance measurement – Emittance evolution from PSB to SPS

Emittance preservation (?) betweenPS @ 26 GeV and SPS flat bottom

Emittance preservation (?) betweenPSB and SPS flat bottom


No dedicated measurements of emittance as function of intensity in 2010−In 2010, emittance blow-up in PS was necessary in order to reduce blow-up in the SPS nominal optics−In low gt optics, no blow-up in PS was necessary

Dedicated measurements in 2011−2010 results for low gt optics confirmed (or outreached)−No additional blow-up in PS needed for nominal optics – in general beam is more stable −First measurement of emittance for high intensity in nominal optics shows promising results

What is different in 2011? Why is beam is so much more stable?

Nominal SPS optics, end of flat bottom (26 GeV/c)

B. Salvant, 26.5.2011

low γt

450 GeV/c

E. Shaposhnikova, Chamonix 2011

Emittances measured 2010, intensity corrected for losses

Puzzle: SPS performance in 2011 wrt 2010?H. Bartosik

• Planned actions• Status of investigations

• Estimated beam characteristics• Planning• Summary


Caveat…

Beam parameters are given at injection in LHC: beam loss and blow-up inside the LHC are not accounted for.

All necessary improvements are implemented in the injectors (Linac4, PSB to PS transfer at 2 GeV, coupled bunch instabilities suppressed, e-cloud suppressed, hardware upgraded…)

Estimated beam degradation in the accelerator chain (based on observations in 2010):

PS: 5 % beam loss, 5 % transverse blow-up

SPS: 10 % beam loss, 5 % transverse blow-up.

RF gymnastics being kept, imperfections are unchanged: +-10 % fluctuation of all bunch parameters within a given PS bunch train.

Traces of ghost/satellite bunches.


0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Emitt

ance

[mm

.mra

d]

Intensity/bunch [x 1E11]

Sterbini (LHC CC10)

Fartoukh (Chamonix11)

Bruning (Chamonix11)

Zimmermann (Chamonix11)

Beam parameters: Comments

BeamParametersat 7 TeV

H/V

tran

sver

se e

mitt

ance

s [m

m.m

rad]

Bunch intensity within constant longitudinal emittance [x1011 p/b]

Constant tr

ansverse

density

(Space ch

arge) Co

nsta

nt lo

ngitu

dina

l den

sity

(Lon

gitu

dina

l ins

tabi

lities

)+

Cons

tant

tota

l bea

m cu

rren

t(R

F po

wer

)

Baseline(estimated limit

of SPS)

Stretched(estimated limit of

SPS injectors)


Beam parameters at LHC injection [50 ns]

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Emitt

ance

[mm

.mra

d]


Sterbini (LHC CC10)





Intensity/bunch Transverse emittances[x 1E11] [mm.mrad rms]

SPS 2.7 1.6PS 3.0 1.5PSB 3.2 1.5


SPS 2.5 3.5PS 2.8 3.3PSB 2.9 3.2

? ?

H/V

tran

sver

se e

mitt

ance

s [m

m.m

rad]


Nominal performance

Baseline(estimated limit of SPS)

Stretched:(estimated limit of

SPS injectors)

< ½ longit. emittance wrt 25 ns during acceleration in the PS

=> Less Landau damping + e-clouds effects ?



0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Emitt

ance

[mm

.mra

d]


Sterbini (LHC CC10)






SPS 2.7 1.6PS 3.0 1.5PSB 3.2 1.5


SPS 2.5 3.5PS 2.8 3.3PSB 2.9 3.2

? ?

MD: single bunch with low gt

MD: double PSB batch

H/V

tran

sver

se e

mitt

ance

s [m

m.m

rad]


Q2/2011

Nominal performance



SPS injectors)


0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Emitt

ance

[mm

.mra

d]


Sterbini (LHC CC10)







SPS 1.8 2.5PS 2.0 2.4PSB 2.1 2.3


SPS 2.1 2.2PS 2.3 2.1PSB 2.4 2.0

? ?H/V

tran

sver

se e

mitt

ance

s [m

m.m

rad]


Nominal performance



SPS injectors)


0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Emitt

ance

[mm

.mra

d]


Sterbini (LHC CC10)







SPS 1.8 2.5PS 2.0 2.4PSB 2.1 2.3


SPS 2.1 2.2PS 2.3 2.1PSB 2.4 2.0

? ?

MD: double PSB batch

H/V

tran

sver

se e

mitt

ance

s [m

m.m

rad]


MD: single bunch with low gt

Nominal performance



SPS injectors)

• Planned actions• Status of investigations• Estimated beam characteristics

• Planning• Summary


Overall LIU PlanningLinac4 PS injector, PS and SPS Beam characteristics at

LHC injection

2011 - 2012

Continuation of construction…

• Beam studies § simulations• Investigation of RCS option• Hardware prototyping• Design § construction of some equipment• TDR

25 ns, 1.2 1011p/b, ~2.5 mm.mrad50 ns, 1.7 1011p/b, ~2.2 mm.mrad75 ns, 1.2 1011 p/b, £ 2 mm.mrad

2013 – 2014 (Long Shutdown 1)

• Linac4 beam commissioning• Connection to PSB ?

• PSB modification (H- injection) ?• PSB beam commissioning ?• Modifications and installation of prototypes in PS and SPS

2015 - 2017

• Progressive increase of Linac4 beam current

• If Linac4 connected: progressive increase of PSB brightness• Some improvement of PS beam (Injection still at 1.4 GeV)• Equipment design § construction for PS injector, PS and SPS • Beam studies

• Limited gain at LHC injection (pending PSB (or RCS), PS and SPS hardware upgrades)

2018(Long Shutdown 2)

• Extensive installations in PS injector, PS and SPS• Beam commissioning

2019 –2021After ~1 year of operation: beam characteristics for HL-LHC…


Summary

MDs during 2011-2012 are essential to refine the knowledge and understanding of the injectors and to check the potential of upgrades.

Preliminary requirement/First goal: getting confidence in beam instrumentation => Extensive debugging: progressing well, but time –consuming...

Recent observations in 2011 tend to demonstrate that the accelerators perform better than in the previous years. Not fully understood.

Need to interact with HL-LHC for selecting reachable beam parameters. Main purpose of the present meeting!

Irrelevant to the decision to connect Linac4 to the PSB during LS1 and to the choice between PSB/RCS, the beam characteristics specified for LIU will be met some time after the end of LS2 (~2020).

THANK YOUFOR YOUR ATTENTION!

Reference


Why is today’s beam better than nominal?

Simple! No more blow-up along the accelerators cascade…

• PSB:• Improved (achromatic) optics in the Linac2 to PSB transfer line since 2005 [http://

khanke.home.cern.ch/khanke/papers/2006/ab_note_2006_001.pdf]

• PS:• Injection trajectories

• Working point along the whole cycle

• Transition

• PS to SPS:• Transverse matching with better optics in TT2-TT10

WARNING: NO MARGIN LEFT!

http://khanke.home.cern.ch/khanke/papers/2006/ab_note_2006_001.pdf

http://khanke.home.cern.ch/khanke/papers/2006/ab_note_2006_001.pdf

Spare slides


Linac4: Commissioning schedule

ID Task Name

1 Linac 4 - Machine2 L4L (3 MeV)3 End of Test Stand operation4 source H- installation5 LEBT installation6 RFQ installation7 MEBT installation8 Hardware Test9 Beam commissioning - 3 MeV10 L4D (50 MeV)11 DTL tanks 3 installation12 DTL tank 1 installation13 Hardware Test14 Beam commissioning15 DTL tanks 2 installation16 intertanks 1-2 & 2-3 installation17 Hardware Test18 Beam commissioning - 50 MeV19 L4C (102MeV)20 CCDTL 3-7 installation21 CCDTL 1-2 installation22 Hardware Test23 Beam commissioning - 102 MeV24 L4P (160 MeV)25 PIMS 4-12 installation26 PIMS 1-3 installation27 Hardware Test28 L4Z29 Main dump30 MQF installation31 BI installation (BTVx3, BCT)32 Beam commissioning Linac4 - 160 MeV

Linac 4 - Machine L4L (3 MeV)

End of Test Stand operationsource H- installation

LEBT installationRFQ installation

MEBT installationHardware Test

Beam commissioning - 3 MeVL4D (50 MeV)

DTL tanks 3 installationDTL tank 1 installation

Hardware TestBeam commissioning

DTL tanks 2 installationintertanks 1-2 & 2-3 installation

Hardware TestBeam commissioning - 50 MeV

L4C (102MeV)CCDTL 3-7 installation

CCDTL 1-2 installationHardware Test

Beam commissioning - 102 MeVL4P (160 MeV)

PIMS 4-12 installationPIMS 1-3 installation

Hardware TestL4ZL4ZMain dumpMQF installationBI installation (BTVx3, BCT)

Beam commissioning Linac4 - 160 MeV

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 4142 4344 4546 474849 50 5152 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014 April 2014 May 2014

2012 2013 2014

Start of beam commissioning (3MeV): May 2013 End of beam commissioning (160 MeV): April 2014

(version November 2010)

5 commissioning stages: 3 MeV 10 MeV 50 MeV 100 MeV 160 MeVIn 2013/14 (15 months), 6.5 months of beam commissioning, 3 months of HW tests, 5.5 months of installation

M. Vretenar


+ Consolidation (Dipoles Power Supply, RF, Cooling § Ventilation) >20 MCHF

PS injector - option 1: PSB Upgrade

BC Group WBS 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total kCHF

PSB Management (M resources) 67020 BE-OP LIU-PSB 1 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 40 560Beam Dynamics 61020 BE-ABP LIU-PSB 2 10 10 10 10 10 0 50Magnets LIU-PSB 3 165 65 65 660 1080 90 2125Magnetic Measurements LIU-PSB 3 20 40 60 60 60 60 60 360RF 69020 BE-RF LIU-PSB 4 0Beam Intercepting Devices EN-STI LIU-PSB 7 25 45 50 50 25 25 25 245Power Converters (PSB) 99237 TE-EPC LIU-PSB 5.2 745 450 5590 6370 1660 1190 16005Power Converters (Injection) Existing* TE-EPC LIU-PSB 5.1 330 1045 105 45 45 1570Vacuum System 99271 TE-VSC LIU-PSB 8 390 290 680Beam Instrumentation 64020 BE-BI LIU-PSB 6 20 368 710 157 1255Commissioning BE-OP LIU-PSB 21 75 75 150Injection Existing* TE-ABT LIU-PSB 9 1000 1000 1500 2125 1500 1000 155 8280Extraction, Transfer 99236 TE-ABT LIU-PSB 10 360 1000 750 450 2560Controls 66020 BE-CO LIU-PSB 11 500 500Electrical Systems EN-EL LIU-PSB 12 1100 500 100 1700Cooling & Ventilation EN-CV LIU-PSB 13 100 900 1000RP and Safety DGS-RP LIU-PSB 16 0Transport and Handling EN-HE LIU-PSB 14 25 25 30 200 280Survey 61021 BE-ABP LIU-PSB 20 5 25 5 5 10 50PSB Total 1440 4988 4230 9167 9460 4540 3430 115 37370

LS2LS1

TE-MSC99281

K. Hanke


Tentative RCS parameters

=> Same beam characteristics than PSB @ 2GeV=> Shorter PS § SPS injection flat bottomsEnergy range 160 MeV to 2 GeV

Circumference (200x 4/21) p m ≈ 119.68 mRepetition rate ~10 HzRF voltage 60 kVHarmonics h = 1 + 2 (in option: 4)Frequency range 1.3 MHz (h=1 at injection) to 9.5 MHz (h=4 at ejection)Beam parameters for LHC (for lower emittances scale down intensity accordingly)

Intensity: up to 12×2.7 1011 protons/cycle (3.25 1012 p/p)Transv. emittance: e*

rms ≈ 2.5 mm Long. emittance: el < 12×0.27 eVs (determined by acceptance for most cases)

Lattice 3-fold symmetry21 cells, 5 cells/arc, 2 cells/straight section

Tunes 3.5 < QH,V < 4.5

Length of straight section (4x) 2 x 2.35 mRelativistic gamma at transition ~4Maximum magnetic field < 1.3 T

Benefits:

•Competitive cost wrt PSB consolidation and upgrade (? Study in progress…)

• Reliability (new hardware / modern design)

• Commissioning decoupled from physics operation

PS injector - option 2: RCS

K. Hanke


+ Consolidation (Cooling § Ventilation, cables replacement…) ~43 MCHF

PS Upgrades

BC Group WBS 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total kCHF

PS Management (M resources) 61030 BE-ABP LIU-PS 1 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 40 560Beam Dynamics 61031 BE-ABP LIU-PS 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 70Magnets 99282 TE-MSC LIU-PS 3 670 330 1000RF 69030 BE-RF LIU-PS 4 110 305 1230 1330 3500 3500 3200 13175EPC 99263 TE-EPC LIU-PS 5 70 140 1110 580 70 210 180 2360Beam instrumentation 64030 BE-BI LIU-PS 6 0Intercepting device EN-STI LIU-PS 7 100 100Vacuum system 99272 TE-VSC LIU-PS 8 25 125 3850 4000Injection 99253 TE-ABT LIU-PS 9 135 300 820 780 560 90 2685Controls BE-CO LIU-PS 11 25 25Electrical system EN-EL LIU-PS 12 0Cooling and ventilation EN-CV LIU-PS 13 0Transport EN-HE LIU-PS 14 880 880Civil engineering 76800 GS-SE LIU-PS 15 30 700 730RP 57393 DGS-RP LIU-PS 16 225 225 450Machine Interlocks TE-MPE LIU-PS 17 0Alarms LIU-PS 18 0Access doors LIU-PS 19 0Survey BE-ABP LIU-PS 20 90 90OP 67030 BE-OP LIU-PS 21 140 140PS Total 415 1120 4350 3150 4440 4360 8380 50 26265

LS1 LS2


+ Consolidation ~ ? MCHF

SPS Upgrades

BC Group WBS 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total kCHFSPS Management (M resources) 99241 TE-ABT LIU-SPS 1 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 40 560

Beam dynamics studies and 69042 BE-RF LIU-SPS 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 80MKDV/H impedance reduction 99242 TE-ABT LIU-SPS 9.2 50 100 150Beam instrumentation 64040 BE-BI LIU-SPS 6 200 600 500 500 300 2100Extraction protection upgrade 99243 TE-ABT LIU-SPS 9.1 100 200 350 300 150 1100New high bandwidth damper 150 150 600 600 300 1800Existing damper power upgrade 100 450 300 150 1000Existing damper removal to 200 300 500RF 200 MHz upgrade 69041 BE-RF LIU-SPS 4.2 850 1400 2400 9850 7450 3650 600 300 26500ecloud mitigation: aC coating 99273 TE-VSC LIU-SPS 8.2 145 350 550 505 620 1050 1800 600 5620New collimation system 99244 TE-ABT LIU-SPS 7 100 200 800 2700 2700 1500 1200 9200New MKE and extraction channel upgrade 99245 TE-ABT LIU-SPS 9.4 200 300 600 1800 1700 1200 600 6400Beam dump upgrade 99246 TE-ABT LIU-SPS 9.5 150 250 800 2500 2100 1300 1000 8100TL protection upgrade 99247 TE-ABT LIU-SPS 9.3 100 200 1500 1500 1500 1000 200 6000SPS Total 1395 3590 6140 15895 17710 12940 7490 3950 69110

69040 BE-RF LIU-SPS 4.3

LS1 LS2


PS injector: RCS feasibility study

Beam characteristics:• for all PS users: equivalent to PSB at 2 GeV• for ISOLDE: ~ 7 1013 p/s @ 2 GeV (today: ~ 1013 p/s @ 1.4 GeV)

Feasibility report withcost estimate: end of July


Principle of Working Point Scans

GOAL: Identify dangerous resonance lines in tune diagramLoss measurement for different WPs:

Low intensity beam (not SC-dominated) → 130 x 1010 protons Large emittance (to fill the chamber & provoke immediate losses) Long flat bottom @ 1.4 GeV Tune program:

− Scan between (0.1 - 0.4)

− Vertical tune constant

− Sweep of the horizontal tune

Slope in the intensity signal indicates importance of the crossed resonance line

E. Benedetto


PS Transverse: Tune Scans

2 GeV E. Benedetto

Þ w/o PFW : no surprises

Þ with PFW ongoing


PS Longitudinal: Batch Compression (1/2)

Chamonix 2011 Workshop Session 9 on LIU C. Carli et al.

Batch Compression Schemes in the PSCompression to hPS = 10 and generation of 64 bunches

Injection and first acceleration with hPS=8 or hPS=9

Potential brightness increase: 12/8 = 1.50*

Corresponds to PSB upgrade: 1.4 GeV to 1.77 GeV

Brightness per bunch for 25 ns trains out of PSB

e*=2.5 mm and 2.23 1011 or e*=1.90 mm and 1.7 1011

Estimate of longitudinal parameters at injection for 25 ns trains

Every bunch split into 8 LHC bunches with 0.35 eVs

1.6 eVs per injected bunch allows a factor 1.75 blow-up

RF gymnastics at an appropriate intermediate energy (hypothesis 2.5 GeV)(Injection and first acceleration with hPS=8 or hPS=9)

PS circumference

hPS=9, 8 bunches

hPS=10, 8 bunches

Splitting

hPS=20, 16 bunches

hPS=21, 16 bunches

hPS=8, 8 bunches

Batch comp.(if feasible)

Batch comp.(challenge)

Batch comp.

*) With hPS=8 at injection, compared to present situation with Linac2 and double batch PSB to PS transfer

MD

test

s –

H. D

amer

au, S

. Han

cock

– M

ay 2

011


PS Longitudinal: Batch Compression (2/2)

Pure h = 9

Pure h = 21

MD result at 2 GeV (H. Damerau, S. Hancock)Simulation (C. Carli)

RF gymnastics OK up to intermediate energy Significant effort required to reach 26 GeV and make beam available for the SPS (RF preparation §

beam adjustment) => Need for precise measurement of transverse emittances before continuing


SPS Transverse: Tune Scans

• Identified resonances in the low gt optics – normal sextupole resonance Qx+2Qy is the strongest– skew sextupole resonance 2Qx+Qy quite strong !!??– normal sextupole Qx-2Qy, skew sextupole resonance at 3Qy and 2Qx+2Qy fourth order resonances visible

• Identified resonances in the nominal optics – normal sextupole resonance Qx+2Qy is the strongest– Coupling resonance (diagonal, either Qx-Qy or some higher order of this), Qx-2Qy normal sextupole – skew sextupole resonance 2Qx+Qy weak compared to Q20 case– It seems that the stop-band width of the vertical integer is stronger than in Q20 optics

H. Bartosik


Measurement of single bunch emittances– In scan with “reference” wire scanner BWS.519 at flat top – Long cycle (~10s injection plateau, ~10s acceleration)– Losses along the cycle extracted from DC-BCT measurement

PS bunch length increasing with intensity – Τ=2.9ns @ 1.5e11 p/b, Τ=3.5ns @ 3e11 p/b– Emittances in PSB: ~ 1μm < 1.5e11p / ~ 1.1μm @ 2e11p / ~ 1.3μm @ 3e11p (Well adjusted

beam in the PSB!)

SPS Transverse: Single Bunch EmittancesH. Bartosik


SPS: 50ns bunch train – Double PSB batch

Intensity 1.65 1011 p/b− Up to 4 batches injected− Very low losses along the cycle (reproducible 3%)− Eh=2.0 mm and Ev=1.9 mm at flat top (sum 3.9)

Measured on 1st batch – to be confirmed


SPS: e-cloud with 25 ns bunch train Electron cloud measured at all the liners

− Signal already visible with 1 batch on both stainless steel liners− No signal visible on the a-C coating liner− Half signal clearly visible on the half coated chamber− Effect of the clearing electrode checked scanning points on a grid of voltage vs.

magnetic field values

Clearing electrode: it was switched off in the middle of cycle

Half-coated liner, only stripe on StSt visible

M. Taborelli


J.J. Gras

Present focus: debugging of transverse emittance measurement – Error source inventory


Emittance blow-up in SPS with low gt

• MD4 beam in PSB with 1.1 turns injected (slightly smaller transverse emittances)• Simultaneous measurements of vertical emittance in PS and SPS

At extraction (just before bunch rotation) in PS using PS-65.V At end of flat bottom using SPS-BWS.519 Here RF-voltage of 5.75 MV in SPS

• If calibration of wire scanners between machine is believed emittance blow-up for intensities above 1.5e11 p/b with peak values of 25% at 3e11 p/b

H. Bartosik

• Planned actions• Status of investigations• Estimated beam characteristics

• Planning• Summary


Linac4 connection to the PSB• High interest of connecting Linac4 to the PSB during LS1:

Staged upgrade spread between LS1 and LS2 (shorter LS2 ?) Timely termination of the Linac4 project

• Reasonable scenario (with 20 months LHC shutdown) if LHC stops in May 2013Þ Possibility to run the injectors until the end of 2013Þ No beam for physics before early 2015

• Scenario based on LHC stop at end 2012 is more risky / not recommended: when physics resumes after 20 months interruption, users will expect similar performance § reliability than before the shutdown…

TENTATIVE SCHEDULE - CONNECTION LINAC4 DURING LONG SHUT-DOWN 2013/2014 - version B 06.04.11

COMMENTS1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Linac4 commissioning L4 commissioning original scheduleReliability run Reliability run 5 months

Transfer line commissioningPSB modifications

PSB commissioningPS/SPS commissioning

LHC Shut-down (20 months beam-to-beam)

2013 2014 M. Vretenar


PSB Upgrades


System Elements

Injection elements Injection septumInjection bumpersEventual extra kicker

Low energy correctors 100 horizontal correctors30 vertical correctors

Low energy skew quadrupoles 45 magnets

Low energy quadrupoles 40 magnets

Transverse damper Power part of existing system

e-cloud attenuation system Chamber coating or electrodeInstallation

Instrumentation BWS, BCT, Orbit system, profile monitors.

Improved shielding on top of route Goward and on top of SMH16

Shielding elements

PS Upgrades

Priority Item When[1] New coupled-bunch FB 20122 Dedicated kicker cavity 2015-2020

10 MHz[1] 1-turn delay FB 20111 Renovate FB amplifiers 2011-2015 (?)

1 Slow phase loops around each cavity 2013-2014

2 New power amplifier (1 tube/gap) 2014-2018 (?)

20 MHz1 1-turn delay FB 20122 Slow phase loops around each cavity 2012

40 MHz[1] Automatic tuning system 20111 1-turn delay FB 20122 New feedback amplifier in grooves 20142 Slow phase loops around each cavity 20123 Study more voltage per cavity 20133 New power supplies 2014-

80 MHz1 1-turn delay FB 20121 Automatic tuning system - PLC, prot./ions switching 2011-2012

2 Slow phase loops around each cavity 20122 New feedback amplifier in grooves 20142 Fast ferrite tuner 20163 Study more voltage per cavity 20133 New power supplies 2014-3 Extra 80 MHz cavity ???

RFInjection, magnets,power converters…

S. Gilardoni


SPS Upgrades (1/2)B. Goddard


Outline LIU-SPS planning - provisionalSPS Upgrades (2/2)

B. Goddard

r. garoby for the liu project team

Documents