quick design guide quick tips using orthogonal techniques … · as cst1, cst2, cst3 and cst4....

1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2011 www.PosterPresentations.com Using Orthogonal Techniques for Protein-Peptide Separation to Generate Comprehensive HDMSe Mass Spectral Libraries from an E. coli Model System Escherichia coli (K-12, MG1655) was grown under approximately 60 different growth conditions including variation of growth phases and carbon sources, limitation of nutrients and stress response induction. Individual culture conditions and a composite cell mixture were used to produce corresponding protein lysates. The resulting proteins were fractioned by denaturing electrophoresis using a prototype of the ELF platform from Sage Science to produce 12 in-solution protein fractions, spanning 5000 –150000 Da. Fractionated protein samples were reduced, alkylated, digested with trypsin, and desalted prior to LC-MS analysis. Peptides were analyzed by multidimensional 2D-RP/RP-HDMSe on a Waters nanoAcquity UPLC and a SYNAPT-G2S HDMS system using data- independent acquisition methods. Assignment of HDMSe spectra to peptide sequences and label-free quantitation were performed using TransOmics software. Introduc4on Jus.n D. Topp 3 , Michael J. Nold 5 , Ezra S. Abrams 2 , Charles L. Farnsworth 1 , ScoP Geromanos 5 , Manor Askenazi 4 , Jeffrey C. Silva 1 1 Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers MA; 2 Sage Science Inc., Beverly MA; 3 Gordon College, Wenham, MA; 4 The Ionomix Ini.a.ve, Arlington, MA; 5 Waters Corpora.on, Milford, MA Spectral Library Work Flow & Results Spectral libraries are increasingly used for peptide identification as they can take full advantage of all spectral features, including relative ion intensities as well as precursor and fragment masses. Such libraries have been constructed by synthesizing individual peptides or by curating spectra from pre-existing proteomic data sets. Libraries generated from experimental data tend to emphasize peptides that are most likely to be observed in typical in vivo experiments and may even preserve characteristics of the underlying biological system. We report a third library generation strategy that builds upon the benefits of existing empirical strategies by implementing orthogonal, multi- dimensional protein and peptide separation techniques to acquire a comprehensive HDMSe spectral library data set for E. coli. Methods Figure 5. (A) Heat map of proteins identified from replicate analyses of the 11 protein fractions and (B) the sum total intensity of characterized proteins identified in each protein fraction using TransOmics analysis. Spectral Library Results Quan4ta4ve and Qualita4ve Results Summary Generation of spectral libraries by coupling the orthogonal techniques of intact protein fractionation with LC-HDMSe shows great promise. Future work will include refinement of the intact protein fractionation step, and utilization of 2D-RP/RP (pH 10/pH 3) LC-HDMSe to increase the percent sequence coverage of each protein, and increase the percent coverage of the E. coli proteome from a single multi-dimensional analysis study. References S.J. Geromanos etal (2009) Proteomics, 9: 1683-1695. J.C. Silva etal (2006) Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 5: 589-607. Figure 2. Analysis Workflow. Protein fractionation, reduction, alkylation, digestion and desalting (step 1, 2d), LC-HDMSe acquisition (step 2, 5d), TransOmics Data Processing and Analysis (step 3, 3d). Quan4ta4ve and Qualita4ve Results Figure 1. Common Media and Growth Phases (black), Carbohydrate Sources (blue), Stress Conditions (red) and Anaerobic Conditions (green) generated for the pooled Escherichia coli reference sample. The growth conditions that were evaluated for global protein measurement are noted as CST1, CST2, CST3 and CST4. Escherichia Coli Growth Condi4ons Figure 3. Sage Science ELF Apparatus for protein fractionation (A) and PAGE analysis of fractionated samples using SDS and UREA buffers (B). 2 days 5 days 3 days Figure 4. HDMSe Acquisition. (A) Illustration of time-resolved precursor and product ion acquisition (LCMSe) with ion mobility separation (IMS) for HDMSe data acquisition, (B) Separation of +1 (black), +2 (blue) and +3 (red) precursors with IMS (C) IMS separation of co-eluting peptides from replicate analysis of ELF-Fraction07 of E. coli reference sample. Figure 6. (A) Fraction of identified proteins from E. coli proteome (B) Distribution of protein coverage (C) Ion Map of AceA (mass, RT, drift time). Figure 10. Self Organizing Map of the scaled relative intensity for all peptide features from the four E. coli growth conditions (see Figure 8). aceB aceA gltA aldA Figure 11. Protein abundance observed among the four E. coli growth conditions (CST1, CST2, CST3 and CST4), including replicates, for select protein groups or pathways (Glyoxylate Shunt, Pyruvate Metabolism and Ribosomes). Relative protein abundance is estimated using the Top3 peptides calibrated against internal standard (yeast ADH1). Pyruvate Metabolism Glyoxylate Shunt Ribosomes aceE pflB aceF mdh rpsT rpsB rpsA rplM Figure 7. HDMSe drift resolved fragment ion spectra for aceE and aceA for E. coli growth conditions (see Figure 8 for sample descriptions). CST1 CST2 CST3 CST4 aceE aceA without IMS with IMS without IMS with IMS Figure 8. Distribution of variation among replicate injections of four E. coli growth conditions (LB, SOC, M9/0.4% glucose and M9/0.4% alanine). Figure 9. Binary comparisons of the TransOmics features from the four growth conditions (log2(ratio) versus control intensity (denominator)). A B C A B Protein Fraction – Replicate Injection Protein Log10(Protein Molecular Weight) Sum Intensity of all Peptides A B C 30% 70% Median %CV = 23.5% CST1 - LB Median %CV = 19.2% CST3 - M9 and 0.4% glucose Median %CV = 20.9% CST2 - SOC Median %CV = 23.0% CST4 - M9 and 0.4% alanine CST1 versus CST2 CST1 versus CST3 CST1 versus CST4 CST2 versus CST3 CST2 versus CST4 CST3 versus CST4 E. coli growth conditions (CST1, CST2, CST3 and CST4) Scaled Relative Intensity of Peptide Features +1 +2 +3 A B log2(ratio)=1, green log2(ratio)=-1, red Quantitation includes only those features with 30% replicate CV for each sample. +1 +2 +3 Color coded by charge state % Protein Coverage Markers

Upload: others

Post on 04-Apr-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: QUICK DESIGN GUIDE QUICK TIPS Using Orthogonal Techniques … · as CST1, CST2, CST3 and CST4. Escherichia)Coli)GrowthCondions Figure 3. Sage Science ELF Apparatus for protein fractionation

QUICK DESIGN GUIDE (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--)

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 42”x90” professional poster. It will save you valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics. Use it to create your presentation. Then send it to PosterPresentations.com for premium quality, same day affordable printing. We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the poster design process and answer your poster production questions. View our online tutorials at: http://bit.ly/Poster_creation_help (copy and paste the link into your web browser). For assistance and to order your printed poster call

PosterPresentations.com at 1.866.649.3004

Object Placeholders

Use the placeholders provided below to add new elements to your poster: Drag a placeholder onto the poster area, size it, and click it to edit. Section Header placeholder Use section headers to separate topics or concepts within your presentation. Text placeholder Move this preformatted text placeholder to the poster to add a new body of text. Picture placeholder Move this graphic placeholder onto your poster, size it first, and then click it to add a picture to the poster.

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2011

www.PosterPresentations.com

QUICK TIPS (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--)

This PowerPoint template requires basic PowerPoint (version 2007 or newer) skills. Below is a list of commonly asked questions specific to this template. If you are using an older version of PowerPoint some template

features may not work properly.

Using the template

Verifying the quality of your graphics Go to the VIEW menu and click on ZOOM to set your preferred magnification. This template is at 50% the size of the final poster. All text and graphics will be printed at 200% their size. To see what your poster will look like when printed, set the zoom to 200% and evaluate the quality of all your graphics before you submit your poster for printing. Using the placeholders To add text to this template click inside a placeholder and type in or paste your text. To move a placeholder, click on it once (to select it), place your cursor on its frame and your cursor will change to this symbol: Then, click once and drag it to its new location where you can resize it as needed. Additional placeholders can be found on the left side of this template. Modifying the layout This template has four different column layouts. Right-click your Mouse on the background and click on “Layout” to see the layout options. The columns in the provided layouts are fixed and cannot be moved but advanced users can modify any layout by going to VIEW and then SLIDE MASTER. Importing text and graphics from external sources TEXT: Paste or type your text into a pre-existing placeholder or drag in a new placeholder from the left side of the template. Move it anywhere as needed. PHOTOS: Drag in a picture placeholder, size it first, click in it and insert a photo from the menu. TABLES: You can copy and paste a table from an external document onto this poster template. To make the text fit better in the cells of an imported table, right-click on the table, click FORMAT SHAPE then click on TEXT BOX and change the INTERNAL MARGIN values to 0.25 Modifying the color scheme To change the color scheme of this template go to the “Design” menu and click on “Colors”. You can choose from the provide color combinations or you can create your own.

©  2011  PosterPresenta.ons.com          2117  Fourth  Street  ,  Unit  C          Berkeley    CA    94710          [email protected]  

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon

Using Orthogonal Techniques for Protein-Peptide Separation to Generate Comprehensive HDMSe Mass Spectral Libraries from an E. coli Model System

Escherichia coli (K-12, MG1655) was grown under approximately 60 different growth conditions including variation of growth phases and carbon sources, limitation of nutrients and stress response induction. Individual culture conditions and a composite cell mixture were used to produce corresponding protein lysates. The resulting proteins were fractioned by denaturing electrophoresis using a prototype of the ELF platform from Sage Science to produce 12 in-solution protein fractions, spanning 5000 –150000 Da. Fractionated protein samples were reduced, alkylated, digested with trypsin, and desalted prior to LC-MS analysis. Peptides were analyzed by multidimensional 2D-RP/RP-HDMSe on a Waters nanoAcquity UPLC and a SYNAPT-G2S HDMS system using data-independent acquisition methods. Assignment of HDMSe spectra to peptide sequences and label-free quantitation were performed using TransOmics software.

Introduc4on  

Jus.n  D.  Topp3,  Michael  J.  Nold5,  Ezra  S.  Abrams2,  Charles  L.  Farnsworth1,  ScoP  Geromanos5,  Manor  Askenazi4,  Jeffrey  C.  Silva1  1Cell  Signaling  Technology,  Danvers  MA;  2Sage  Science  Inc.,  Beverly  MA;  3Gordon  College,  Wenham,  MA;  4The  Ionomix  Ini.a.ve,  Arlington,  MA;  5Waters  Corpora.on,  Milford,  MA  

Spectral  Library  Work  Flow  &  Results  

Spectral libraries are increasingly used for peptide identification as they can take full advantage of all spectral features, including relative ion intensities as well as precursor and fragment masses. Such libraries have been constructed by synthesizing individual peptides or by curating spectra from pre-existing proteomic data sets. Libraries generated from experimental data tend to emphasize peptides that are most likely to be observed in typical in vivo experiments and may even preserve characteristics of the underlying biological system. We report a third library generation strategy that builds upon the benefits of existing empirical strategies by implementing orthogonal, multi-dimensional protein and peptide separation techniques to acquire a comprehensive HDMSe spectral library data set for E. coli.

Methods  Figure 5. (A) Heat map of proteins identified from replicate analyses of the 11 protein fractions and (B) the sum total intensity of characterized proteins identified in each protein fraction using TransOmics analysis.

Spectral  Library  Results   Quan4ta4ve  and  Qualita4ve  Results  

Summary  Generation of spectral libraries by coupling the orthogonal techniques of intact protein fractionation with LC-HDMSe shows great promise. Future work will include refinement of the intact protein fractionation step, and utilization of 2D-RP/RP (pH 10/pH 3) LC-HDMSe to increase the percent sequence coverage of each protein, and increase the percent coverage of the E. coli proteome from a single multi-dimensional analysis study.

References  S.J. Geromanos etal (2009) Proteomics, 9: 1683-1695. J.C. Silva etal (2006) Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 5: 589-607.

Figure 2. Analysis Workflow. Protein fractionation, reduction, alkylation, digestion and desalting (step 1, 2d), LC-HDMSe acquisition (step 2, 5d), TransOmics Data Processing and Analysis (step 3, 3d).

Quan4ta4ve  and  Qualita4ve  Results  

Figure 1. Common Media and Growth Phases (black), Carbohydrate Sources (blue), Stress Conditions (red) and Anaerobic Conditions (green) generated for the pooled Escherichia coli reference sample. The growth conditions that were evaluated for global protein measurement are noted as CST1, CST2, CST3 and CST4.

Escherichia  Coli  Growth  Condi4ons   Figure 3. Sage Science ELF Apparatus for protein fractionation (A) and PAGE analysis of fractionated samples using SDS and UREA buffers (B).

2  days   5  days   3  days  

Figure 4. HDMSe Acquisition. (A) Illustration of time-resolved precursor and product ion acquisition (LCMSe) with ion mobility separation (IMS) for HDMSe data acquisition, (B) Separation of +1 (black), +2 (blue) and +3 (red) precursors with IMS (C) IMS separation of co-eluting peptides from replicate analysis of ELF-Fraction07 of E. coli reference sample.

Figure 6. (A) Fraction of identified proteins from E. coli proteome (B) Distribution of protein coverage (C) Ion Map of AceA (mass, RT, drift time).

Figure 10. Self Organizing Map of the scaled relative intensity for all peptide features from the four E. coli growth conditions (see Figure 8).

aceB

aceA

gltA

aldA

Figure 11. Protein abundance observed among the four E. coli growth conditions (CST1, CST2, CST3 and CST4), including replicates, for select protein groups or pathways (Glyoxylate Shunt, Pyruvate Metabolism and Ribosomes). Relative protein abundance is estimated using the Top3 peptides calibrated against internal standard (yeast ADH1).

Pyruvate Metabolism

Glyoxylate Shunt

Ribosomes

aceE pflB aceF

mdh

rpsT rpsB rpsA rplM

Figure 7. HDMSe drift resolved fragment ion spectra for aceE and aceA for E. coli growth conditions (see Figure 8 for sample descriptions).

CST1

CST2

CST3

CST4

aceE aceA

without IMS with IMS without IMS with IMS

Figure 8. Distribution of variation among replicate injections of four E. coli growth conditions (LB, SOC, M9/0.4% glucose and M9/0.4% alanine).

Figure 9. Binary comparisons of the TransOmics features from the four growth conditions (log2(ratio) versus control intensity (denominator)).

A B

C

A B

Protein Fraction – Replicate Injection

Prot

ein

Log10(Protein Molecular Weight)

Sum

Inte

nsity

of a

ll Pe

ptid

es

A

B

C 30%

70%

Median %CV = 23.5% CST1 - LB

Median %CV = 19.2% CST3 - M9 and 0.4% glucose

Median %CV = 20.9% CST2 - SOC

Median %CV = 23.0% CST4 - M9 and 0.4% alanine

CST1 versus CST2 CST1 versus CST3 CST1 versus CST4

CST2 versus CST3 CST2 versus CST4 CST3 versus CST4

E. coli growth conditions (CST1, CST2, CST3 and CST4)

Scal

ed R

elat

ive

Inte

nsity

of P

eptid

e Fe

atur

es

+1

+2

+3

A B

log2(ratio)=1, green log2(ratio)=-1, red

Quantitation includes only those features with 30% replicate CV for each sample.

+1 +2

+3

Color coded by charge state

% Protein Coverage

Markers