questions do we need further consultation on our capital plan for the peninsula? what should the...
TRANSCRIPT
Questions• Do we need further consultation on our capital plan for
the peninsula?
• What should the scope of the consultation be?
• Are we limiting the consultation to the three schools we are discussing here tonight or should the consultation be expanded to include the entire peninsula?
• What are the options we should consider?
Questions• When does renovating a school become an expenditure
rather than a long-term investment?
• What are the criteria we should use for developing a consensus on what is best for the education of our students in this community?
• What direction do you want me to take back to the Board as a result of our consultation?
Chronology• January 9, 2002 – Department of Education asks for revised
Capital Construction list by February 15.
• February 26, 2002 – New Capital list approved by the HRSB forwarded to the Department of Education.
• June 12, 2003 – Education Minister announces that the province will build three new schools in the HRSB.
• November 15, 2004 – DOE asks the HRSB to confirm current priority list and prepare a list of any new needs.
• December 22, 2004 – Board approves new priority list and forwards to the DOE.
• July 2005 – DOE requests additional information from the HRSB on proposed Capital projects.
• August 3, 2005 – Revised submission forwarded to the DOE for information.
• September 28, 2005 – HRSB approves Capital Project submission by a recorded vote of 9 to 4.
• November 29, 2006 – HRSB motion directs the Superintendent to consult with the SACs.
Chronology
• All 8 school boards submit requests
• Provincial committee reviews each request and prioritizes based on four criteria:
– Condition of the existing building
– Capacity of existing infrastructure
– Existing capacity to accommodate core programs
– Efficiencies a project may create.
New schools
LeMarchant-St. Thomas
• Built in 1923 and 1930. Renovation in 1958
• Capacity Range: 339 to 397
• Current Enrolment: 301
HRM Regional Plan
• Directs growth to areas with existing infrastructure
• 25% of anticipated growth directed to Halifax Peninsula and Downtown Dartmouth
• Attract younger families into the area.
• An attribute of attracting this cohort is existing neighbourhood schools.
HRM Regional Plan
• Concerns– Average household expected to decrease from
1.91 persons to 1.86 persons
– Lack of affordable housing on Halifax Peninsula.
– Differences between HRSB and HRM plans
School Size• Smaller versus Larger?
• Is there an Optimal School Size?
• Educators recommend many things– About 300 to 500 for Elementary
• Positive Student Outcomes influenced by– Teacher Quality– Parental Income and School Involvement– School Building itself
School BuildingCharacteristics
• School Age
• Higher achievement in Modern schools
• More positive student attitudes toward school– Higher self-esteem– More prosocial behaviour– Increased feelings of comfort and security– Better attendance
Questions• Do we need further consultation on our capital plan for
the peninsula?
• What should the scope of the consultation be?
• Are we limiting the consultation to the three schools we are discussing here tonight or should the consultation be expanded to include the entire peninsula?
Questions
• What are the options we should consider?
– New South End School to replace three schools– A renovation to one or more of the existing schools– Replace one or more of the existing schools with new
facilities– Are there other options?
Questions• When does renovating a school become an expenditure
rather than a long-term investment?
• What are the criteria we should use for developing a consensus on what is best for the education of our students in this community?
• What direction do you want me to take back to the Board as a result of our consultation?
• Any other Questions or Comments?