question: why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for...

35
Question: Why 45 o , physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution : Coriolis force is balanced by vertical mixing (friction) for Ekman If A z is constant, 45 o relation is not likely to hold Only if B=0, i.e., as z-

Upload: rhoda-walton

Post on 18-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Question: Why 45o, physics or math?

and are perpendicular to each other

45o relation holds for boundary layer solution

Physics: Coriolis force is balanced by vertical mixing (friction) for Ekman flow

If Az is constant,

45o relation is not likely to hold

Only if B=0, i.e., as z-

Page 2: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Question: Why 45o, physics or math?

and are not likely perpendicular to each other

Physics: Coriolis force is balanced by vertical mixing (friction) for Ekman flow

If Az is not constant,

45o relation is not likely to hold even for boundary layer solution

Page 3: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Wind-driven circulation II

Wind pattern and oceanic gyres

Sverdrup Relation

Vorticity Equation

Page 4: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

What generate the gyre circulation?

Page 5: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Surface current measurement from ship drift

Current measurements are harder to make than T&SThe data are much sparse.

Page 6: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/dac/gdp_drifter.php

Page 7: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Surface current observations

Page 8: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Surface current observations

Page 9: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 10: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 11: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 12: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 13: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 14: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

A climatology of near-surface currents and SST for the world, at one degree resolution, derived from satellite-tracked surface drifting buoy observations. Most recent data included: 1 January 2011. Reference:Lumpkin, R. and Z. Garraffo, 2005: Evaluating the Decomposition of Tropical Atlantic Drifter Observations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Techn. I 22, 1403-1415.Lumpkin, R. and S. L. Garzoli, 2005: Near-surface Circulation in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. I 52(3),495-518, 10.1016/j.dsr.2004.09.001.

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/dac/drifter_climatology.html

Page 15: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Drifting Buoy Data Assembly Center, Miami, Florida Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, NOAA

Page 16: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Annual Mean Surface CurrentPacific Ocean, 1995-2003

Drifting Buoy Data Assembly Center, Miami, Florida Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, NOAA

Page 17: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 18: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 19: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Schematic picture of the major surface currents of the world oceans

Note the anticyclonic circulation in the subtropics (the subtropical gyres)

Page 20: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Relation between surface winds and subtropical gyres

Page 21: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Surface winds and oceanic gyres: A more realistic view

Note that the North Equatorial Counter Current (NECC) is against the direction of prevailing wind.

Page 22: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 23: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 24: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Sverdrup RelationConsider the following balance in an ocean of depth h of flat

bottom

(1)

(2)

Integrating vertically from –h to 0 for both (1) and (2), we have(neglecting bottom stress and surface height change)

where

(3)

(4)

are total zonal and meridional transport of mass

sum of geostrophic and ageostropic transports

Page 25: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Differentiating , we have

Define We have

(3) and (4) can be written as

(5) (6)

Page 26: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Using continuity equation

And define

Vertical component of the wind stress curl

We have Sverdrup equation

If The line provides a natural boundary that separate the circulation into “gyres”

Page 27: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

is the total meridional mass transport

Geostrophic transport

Ekman transport

Order of magnitude example:At 35oN, -4 s-1, 2 10-11 m-1 s-1, assume x10-1 Nm-2 y=0

Page 28: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

then

Page 29: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Since , we have

set x =0 at the eastern boundary,

Further assume

In the trade wind and equatorial zones, the 2nd derivative term dominates:

Page 30: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 31: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 32: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

Mass Transport

Since

Let ,

,

where is stream function.

Problem: only one boundary condition can be satisfied.

Page 33: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

1 Sverdrup (Sv) =106 m3/s

Page 34: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced
Page 35: Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced

A More General Form of Sverdrup Equation

Surface stress curl

Bottom stress curl

Bottom topography effectVanish if the bottom is flatOr flow follows topographic contour