quenched and quenching galaxies at low to high redshifts

25
Quenched and Quenching Galaxies at Low to High Redshifts S.M. Faber & UCSC and CANDELS collaborators Dekel60 Fest December 13, 2011 M31: UV GALEX

Upload: kalli

Post on 22-Feb-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Quenched and Quenching Galaxies at Low to High Redshifts. S .M. Faber & UCSC and CANDELS collaborators Dekel60 Fest December 13 , 2011. M31: UV GALEX. Quenching Scenarios for Central Galaxies. Halo-based  Massive halo quenching: “cold flows” to hot - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Quenched and Quenching Galaxies at Low to High

RedshiftsS.M. Faber & UCSC and CANDELS collaborators

Dekel60 FestDecember 13, 2011

M31: UV GALEX

Page 2: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Quenching Scenarios for Central Galaxies

Halo-based Massive halo quenching: “cold flows” to hot halos + AGN (“radio mode”)

Bulge-building Major merger -> starburst + AGN Minor mergers + AGN Disk instability + AGN Disk secular evolution + AGN Morphological quenching (Toomre Q)

Hopping/rejuvenation Mergers Stochastic accretion

Correlate with galaxy properties

Correlate with halo properties

Page 3: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Part I:Quenching of central SDSS

galaxies at z ~ 0 with halo mass vs. stellar mass

Joanna Woo & Avishai Dekel

Joanna

Page 4: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Probability of quenching vs. M* and Mhalo

Woo et al. 2011

Contours run vertically.

Quenching correlates better with halo mass than with stellar mass.

Page 5: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Part II:HST UV images of nearby Green Valley

galaxiesJerome Fang, Samir Salim, S. M. Faber, et al.

Jerome

Page 6: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

HST UV images of SDSS green valley galaxies

Fang, Salim et al. 2011

20 galaxies imaged with HST SBC.

Sample lies in bluer part of green valley.

Page 7: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

HST FUV images

Fang, Salim et al. 2011

Page 8: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

HST sample vs. general green valley

Fang, Salim et al. 2011

Many more GV galaxies with similar properties.

Page 9: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Colors imply underlying substrate of older stars

Fang, Salim et al. 2011

ESFETGs

Mass-matched in blue cloud

Fang, Salim et al. 2011

Page 10: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

HST FUV images

Fang, Salim et al. 2011

Page 11: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

GALEX: M31

Page 12: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Part III:Structure of AEGIS galaxies on Red Sequence vs. Blue Cloud at z ~ 0.8

Edmond Cheung, Liz McGrath, & David Koo

Edmond

Page 13: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Try different combinations of mass and radius

Cheung et al. 2011

DEEP2 survey: spec z’s and photoz’s. Redshift range z = 0.5-0.8.

Mass M/reff M/reff2

Page 14: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

None work perfectly. There is always overlap region.

Cheung et al. 2011

DEEP2 survey: spec z’s and photoz’s. Redshift range z = 0.5-0.8.

Mass M/reff M/reff2

Surface density Kauffmann+06

Page 15: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Cheung et al. 2011

Is there a second structural variable?

Cheung et al. 2011

DEEP2 survey: spec z’s and photoz’s. Redshift range z = 0.5-0.8.

Page 16: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

U-B

U-B

U-B

Bulge M* is higher

Bulge radius is smaller

Bulge M*/re is lower

Cheung et al. 2011

AEGIS galaxies have bulge-disk decompositions using GIM2D.

In the overlap region, the color change is accompanied by structural changes.

Stellar mass becomes more concentrated.

Page 17: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Sersic index: looks like a threshold, except for outliers

Cheung et al. 2011

outliers

See also Bell+08, Bell+11

Page 18: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Inner mass surface density increases across color divide

McGrath, Koo et al. 2011

Rejuvenation model no good; one way trip

Structure is better predictor of quenching than halo or stellar mass

Page 19: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Part IV:Pre- and post-quenched galaxies in

CANDELS at z ~ 2

Mark Mozena, Tao Wang, JS Huang, and CANDELS team

Mark

Page 20: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Color-mass diagram: CANDELS/ERS in GOODS-S

✖ Spheroid

✖ Mixed or Irr

✖ Disk

Z = 1.5-2.5

Mozena et al. 2011

Visual classes:

Note color-mass relation already

at z~2!

Page 21: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Massive galaxies > 1010.8 M at z~2 in Gini/M20

Quiescent

Star-forming

Wang et al. 2011

Half quenched, half star-forming.

Strong correlation with morphology.

These SFR galaxies will all be quenched by z~1.

WFC3-IR images from CANDELS and ERS in GOODS-S

Page 22: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Radius-mass diagram: GOODS-S

✖ Spheroid

✖ Mixed or Irr

✖ Disk

Z = 1.5-2.5

Mozena et al. 2011

Also Cirasuolo et al. 2011

Visual classes:

Page 23: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Radius-mass diagram: GOODS-S

✖ Spheroid

✖ Mixed or Irr

✖ Disk

Z = 1.5-2.5

Mozena et al. 2011

Also Cirasuolo et al. 2011

Visual classes:

Almost bimodal!

Page 24: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Radius-mass diagram: GOODS-S

✖ Spheroid

✖ Mixed or Irr

✖ Disk

Z = 1.5-2.5

Mozena et al. 2011

Also Cirasuolo et al. 2011

Visual classes:

X5

Page 25: Quenched and Quenching  Galaxies at  Low to High  Redshifts

Conclusions: There exist structural parameters that are better predictors of quenching than either halo or stellar mass. An indispensible ingredient in the quenching process at all redshifts is either caused by (or leaves its imprint on) the stellar mass distribution – stars move to center. At low z, this process does not involve major mergers or a large change in radius. At high z, gross shrinkage in radius of x5 occurs.

Is the process the same or different at high z?