quasiparticle scattering in 2-d helical liquid

28
Quasiparticle Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid arXiv: 0910.0756 X. Zhou, C. Fang, W.-F. Tsai, J. P. Hu

Upload: kermit

Post on 23-Feb-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Quasiparticle Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid. arXiv : 0910.0756 X. Zhou, C. Fang, W.-F. Tsai, J. P. Hu. Outline. Introduction The Model and T-matrix Formalism Numerical Results Nonmagnetic point impurity Classical magnetic point impurity Nonmagnetic edge impurity. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Quasiparticle Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

arXiv: 0910.0756X. Zhou, C. Fang, W.-F. Tsai, J. P. Hu

Page 2: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Outline

• Introduction• The Model and T-matrix Formalism• Numerical Results

• Nonmagnetic point impurity• Classical magnetic point impurity• Nonmagnetic edge impurity

Page 3: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Introduction

3D topological insulators property: bulk insulating gaps, but gapless surface states protected by topological property of time-reversal symmetry;Odd number of Dirac cones.

Spin helical Dirac fermionsSpin locked to the momentum, leading to the breakdown of spin rotation symmetry.

Why QPI?QPI provides a direct evidence to justify the model.

Page 4: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

For Bi2Te3, constant-energy contours of the band structure and the evolution of the height of EF referenced to the Dirac point for the doping 0.67%. Red lines are guides to the eye that indicate the shape of the constant-energy band contours and intersect at the Dirac point.

X. L. Chen et al, Science 325,178 (2009)

Page 5: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Model

isotropic 2D helical Dirac fermions

Hexagonal distortion of the FS

L. Fu, arXiv:0908.1418

Particle-hole symmetry holds

σi here are real spin operators.

Page 6: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

The characteristic length scale:

Page 7: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Warping term effects: nonlinear

Density of states based on the model:

Page 8: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Spin textures around the FS at ω=0.05eV in (a) and at ω=0.3eV in (b)

Non-vanishing spin along z direction exist moments around the FS, due to σz in the warping term, except on the vertices.No out-of-plane spin polarization

for 2D Dirac fermions

Page 9: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

T-matrix method & FormalismGeneral N-impurity problem

Impurity-induced electronic Green’s function and T-matrix:

Green’s function (in momentum space) of the pure system:

Page 10: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Consider the case of a single point impurity located at the origin, means the scattering potential is momentum independence, T-matrix can be simply written as:

LDOS FT-LDOS

Page 11: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Re

Im

Page 12: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Numerical Results

Page 13: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Important Feature: absence of backscattering between diagonal vertices, which is topologically prohibited, by time reversal invariance.

A. Nonmagnetic point impurity

Page 14: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Theoretical argument

Time-reversal operator has the property

Page 15: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

B. Classical magnetic point impurity

Feature: Very little effect on the charge density, means

Why? To the lowest order ( ), spin-up & spin-down electrons see scattering potentials with opposite signs.

Page 16: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Naturally we introduce the spin local density of states (SLDOS) to study the interference for magnetic impurity case, and focus on the FT of the z-component SLDOS.

Similar to the LDOS, the real and imaginary parts of FT-SLDOS correspond to the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of respectively.

Page 17: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Important Feature: Presence of backscattering between diagonal vertices.

Why? The z-component of impurity spin polarization flips in-plane spin moments.

Impurity spin polarization along z-axis

Page 18: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Feature: The antisymmetric part is larger than the symmetric part.

Magnetic impurities with in-plane magnetic moments

Page 19: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Impurity spin polarization along y-axis

Features: 1. The model has y -y mirror symmetry (my);

3. The strongest interference appears at wave vector ±q51.

2.

Page 20: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Impurity spin polarization along x-axis

2.

Feature: 1. The model breaks x -x mirror symmetry (mx);

3. The strongest interference appears at wave vector ±q13 & ±q35.

≈ 0

Page 21: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Experimental Suggestions

Spin polarized along y-axis:Spin polarized along x-axis:both are held in-plane model, i.e.

only one is held warping term with σz required, i.e.

??

Page 22: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

V

0

y

x

C. Nonmagnetic edge impurity

Boundary condition:

Quantum state on the LHS:

ky conserved

Page 23: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid
Page 24: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid
Page 25: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Important Features in LDOS with the presence of nonmagneticedge impurity:

1. Friedel oscillation exists (at fixed energy);

2. The major contribution comes from the opposite k-points on the constant energy contour, but will not hold if the scattering between the states at k & -k is forbidden;

3. The oscillation will decay as a form 1/√d, if there exist allowed the opposite k-points on the constant energy contour; in other words, long distance decaying function depends on the Fermi energy.

4. When |x| is large enough, the stationary points approximation tells us that, if the edge impurity is along the y-axis, the interference pattern is dominated by the k-points where kx reaches local minimum or maximum.

Page 26: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Thanks!

Page 27: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid

Discussion

(i) We neglected the possibility of any ordering due to interaction-induced FS instability. This is valid as long as there is no significant FS nesting vector.

(iii) our calculation shows behavior if the FS shape is dominated by the warping term, and if the warping term is negligible.

(ii) Strong electron-electron interaction is not expected based on the following observation. In experiments on topological insulators, the Fermi level of the sample in general is closer to the bottom of the conduction band and is far away from the Dirac point. Such a system with finite density of states may provide enough screening effect to Coulomb interaction between surface electrons.

Page 28: Quasiparticle  Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid