quarter 2 data review - co02201641.schoolwires.net€¦ · english language arts –quarter 2 ela...

Presented by: Eric Mason, Ph.D., andGregory Ecks, Ph.D.Jeremy Koselak

Quarter 2 Data Review

February 2019

Galileo K12 assessment results• Achievement• Growth

Graduation and Dropout

Behavior data• Discipline• Suspensions• Attendance

ACT Schools Update

Topics to be covered

Galileo K12 Aligned Benchmark Assessment

Quarter 2 Report

Galileo K12 Achievement

• Galileo K12 uses scale scores to estimate probable student performance on the Colorado Measures of Academic Success (CMAS)

• Students are given a criterion measure of levels 1-5• Scores of levels 4 (Met Expectations) and 5 (Exceeded

Expectations) are estimated to pass the CMAS tests in April.

• A student is considered meeting grade level expectations if he or she scores at least a 750 on the CMAS

• Results cannot be compared to the state or district CMAS results because they do not represent the entire district. (5 schools take an alternate benchmark assessment)

Tested

Grade Enrollment ELA Math*

3 2033 1643 77% 1641 77%

4 2000 1642 77% 1638 77%

5 2063 1680 79% 1679 79%

6 1914 1319 62% 1325 62%

7 1973 1400 66% 1419 72%

8 1885 1329 62% 1415 75%

Percent Tested by Grade level:District Benchmarks Quarter 2

*Math for 7th and 8th grades includes students taking the Algebra I benchmark

5

English Language Arts

Achievement

Percent Met or Exceeded SPF Groups:English Language Arts – Quarter 2

ELA Benchmark 2 Galileo K12

D11 Minority FRL ELL IEP GT Female Male

GRADE 3 54% 45% 44% 25% 9% 95% 59% 49%

GRADE 4 48% 37% 37% 10% 11% 94% 52% 44%

GRADE 5 34% 26% 24% 6% 8% 86% 33% 34%

GRADE 6 36% 27% 26% 2% 5% 91% 35% 37%

GRADE 7 37% 26% 26% 8% 2% 88% 40% 34%

GRADE 8 27% 17% 20% 3% 2% 82% 30% 24%

7

Change in percent passing from Benchmark 1-SPF Groups:English Language Arts



GRADE 3 14% 13% 14% 15% 1% 7% 13% 14%

GRADE 4 4% 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% 4% 5%

GRADE 5 -7% -6% -7% 6% 1% -6% -12% -4%

GRADE 6 -1% -1% -1% -1% 2% 1% -6% 4%

GRADE 7 -1% 0% 0% 8% 0% -3% -2% 1%

GRADE 8 -6% -3% -3% 3% -3% -9% -7% -6%

8

Percent Met or Exceeded Race/Ethnicity:English Language Arts – Quarter 2


D11 Black Hispanic 2 or More White

GRADE 3 54% 36% 45% 48% 62%

GRADE 4 48% 26% 35% 56% 56%

GRADE 5 34% 19% 24% 35% 40%

GRADE 6 36% 24% 25% 35% 45%

GRADE 7 37% 14% 26% 38% 46%

GRADE 8 27% 11% 13% 39% 34%

9

Percent Met or Exceeded Race/Ethnicity:English Language Arts – Quarter 2



GRADE 3 14% 9% 13% 14% 14%

GRADE 4 4% 1% 2% 8% 4%

GRADE 5 -7% -10% -5% -7% -10%

GRADE 6 -1% -7% -1% 1% 0%

GRADE 7 -1% 2% 1% 2% -1%

GRADE 8 -6% 2% -5% -3% -10%

10

Math

Achievement

Percent Met or Exceed SPF Groups:Math – Quarter 2

Math Benchmark 2 Galileo K12


GRADE 3 41% 36% 33% 29% 12% 90% 39% 43%

GRADE 4 43% 36% 33% 21% 14% 91% 42% 44%

GRADE 5 18% 12% 12% 1% 6% 69% 16% 21%

GRADE 6 29% 22% 19% 6% 2% 85% 26% 32%

GRADE 7 10% 7% 6% 0% 2% 46% 9% 10%

GRADE 8 26% 18% 21% 8% 6% 91% 27% 24%

Alg I 51% 47% 41% * * 76% 48% 53%12

Percent Met or Exceed SPF Groups:Math – Quarter 2



GRADE 3 -3% 1% 0% 11% -2% -3% -4% -2%

GRADE 4 11% 11% 10% 14% 6% 8% 10% 12%

GRADE 5 -15% -13% -14% -2% -2% -16% -12% -16%

GRADE 6 6% 6% 4% 4% -1% 14% 3% 8%

GRADE 7 -8% -6% -5% 0% 0% -18% -7% -10%

GRADE 8 7% 4% 8% 5% 1% 11% 8% 6%

Alg I 4% 7% 5% * * 5% 4% 5%13

Percent Met or Exceeded Race/Ethnicity:Math – Quarter 2



GRADE 3 41% 32% 34% 40% 45%

GRADE 4 43% 27% 36% 42% 49%

GRADE 5 18% 6% 11% 20% 24%

GRADE 6 29% 18% 21% 28% 37%

GRADE 7 10% 4% 7% 12% 11%

GRADE 8 26% 18% 15% 30% 33%

Alg I 55% * 42% 54% 59%14

Change in percent passing from Benchmark 1 Race/ Ethnicity - Math



GRADE 3 -3% 6% 0% -5% -8%

GRADE 4 11% 10% 12% 14% 10%

GRADE 5 -15% -11% -12% -16% -16%

GRADE 6 6% 6% 6% 3% 6%

GRADE 7 -8% 0% -5% -8% -12%

GRADE 8 7% 6% 2% 9% 10%

Alg I 4% * 7% * 3%15

Galileo K12 Growth

• Galileo K12 measures growth using scale scores

• Scores are compared between two tests

• A student meeting growth expectations has a scale score increase more than the average student in that tested subject and grade.

• A higher scale score generally indicates that students are answering more questions or more difficult questions correctly than on a prior test

English Language Arts

Growth

Percent Met Growth Expectations Benchmark 2SPF Groups - English Language Arts

ELA ADB1 to ADB2 Growth Galileo K12


GRADE 3 62% 58% 49% 52% 25% 83% 65% 60%

GRADE 4 62% 57% 60% 44% 49% 77% 63% 61%

GRADE 5 45% 47% 47% 45% 46% 47% 41% 51%

GRADE 6 46% 45% 45% 37% 40% 47% 39% 52%

GRADE 7 51% 48% 51% 42% 49% 58% 52% 50%

GRADE 8 48% 53% 51% 61% 54% 51% 45% 51%

18

Percent Met Growth Benchmark 2Race/ Ethnicity – English Language Arts

ELA ADB1 to ADB2 Growth Galileo K12


GRADE 3 62% 55% 57% 63% 66%

GRADE 4 62% 54% 57% 61% 66%

GRADE 5 45% 50% 48% 42% 55%

GRADE 6 46% 36% 47% 50% 47%

GRADE 7 51% 45% 51% 40% 54%

GRADE 8 48% 55% 51% 50% 45%

19

Math

Growth

Percent Met Growth Benchmark 2SPF Groups – Math

Math ADB1 to ADB2 Growth Galileo K12


GRADE 3 51% 54% 54% 66% 53% 37% 52% 49%

GRADE 4 70% 69% 69% 65% 66% 69% 68% 72%

GRADE 5 30% 33% 32% 43% 40% 23% 32% 28%

GRADE 6 52% 50% 50% 37% 41% 73% 48% 57%

GRADE 7 40% 44% 44% 50% 59% 30% 41% 39%

GRADE 8 53% 49% 51% 50% 44% 65% 50% 57%

Alg I 61% 55% 59% * * 64% 66% 56% 21

Percent Met Growth Expectations Benchmark 2Race/Ethnicity - Math



GRADE 3 51% 61% 54% 47% 48%

GRADE 4 70% 60% 70% 72% 71%

GRADE 5 30% 31% 34% 30% 27%

GRADE 6 52% 51% 50% 48% 55%

GRADE 7 40% 47% 44% 41% 36%

GRADE 8 53% 45% 50% 53% 57%

Alg I 61% * 57% 60% 63%22

Credits Off Track: Q2 Report

8%

15%

22%

28%

11%

18%

24%

32%

6%

11%

20%

24%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Ninth Tenth Eleventh Twelfth

Percent off track

Percent Off Track Male Female

24

8%

15%

22%

28%

11%

21%20%

37%

7%

12%

18%

23%

10%

19%

29%

34%

8%

10%

23%

28%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%


Percent off track

Percent Off Track Black White Hispanic Other

25

8%

15%

22%

28%

17%

23%

43% 43%

11%

18%

24%

30%

6%

11%

21%

27%

1%

6% 6%7%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%


Percent off track

Percent Off Track ESL FRL Non-FRL GT

26

Graduation and Dropout Rates

27

Four-Year Graduation Rate Trend

66.0% 68.2% 68.5% 69.7% 69.1% 70.1%

76.9% 77.3% 77.3% 78.9% 79.0% 80.7%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Class of 2013 Class of 2014 Class of 2015 Class of 2016 Class of 2017 Class of 2018

District Grad Rate State Grad Rate

28

Four-Year Graduation Rate Trend by Special Population

66.0% 68.2% 68.5% 69.7% 69.1% 70.1%

33.5%

45.3% 36.7%

49.5%

44.4%41.0%

55.3%

57.8%

70.1%

63.6%

71.2%

61.8%

56.2%58.5% 60.1% 60.6%

62.2%63.4%

89.9% 89.8%87.1% 87.2%

90.0%92.2%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Class of 2013 Class of 2014 Class of 2015 Class of 2016 Class of 2017 Class of 2018

District Students with Disabilities English Learners Lunch Eligible Gifted-Talented

29

Historical Dropout Rate Trend

2.8%

3.3%

2.5%

3.1%

2.7%

2.4%2.5%

2.3% 2.3%2.2%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

Class of 2014 Class of 2015 Class of 2016 Class of 2017 Class of 2018

District 11 State

30

Historical Dropout Rate Trend by Special Population

2.8%

3.3%

2.5%

3.1%

2.7%

3.1%

3.7%

2.8%3.0%

2.8%3.0%

4.2%

3.2%

3.5%

4.0%

2.4% 2.4%

2.0%

2.7%

2.4%

0.4%

0.7%0.8%

0.6%

0.9%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%


District 11 Students with Disabilities English Learners Lunch Eligible Gifted-Talented

31

Historical Dropout Rate Trend by Race/Ethnicity

3.7%3.9%

3.1%

3.4%

3.9%

3.5%

4.2%

3.3%

3.8%

3.2%

2.8%2.6%

1.7%

2.4%

1.9%

2.4%

2.9%

2.0%

2.8%

2.3%

1.9%1.9% 1.8%

2.4% 2.3%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%


Black Hispanic/Latino Other Minority White Two or More Races

32

Student Behavior and Attendance: Q2 Report

33

089%

16%

22%

31% 4 to 10

2%

0

1

2

3

4 to 10

Number of Incidents by Percent of D11 Student Body

34

9.0%

3.3%

2.2%

1.0%

6.7%

2.2%

1.0%0.5%

5.5%

1.7%

0.8%0.5%

6.3%

2.3%

1.2%

0.4%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

1 2 3 4 to 10

Incidents as Percent of D11 Student Body by Race/Ethnicity

Black or African American Hispanic or Latino White Other

35

6.2%

7.5% 7.8%7.0%

10.0%

2.0%2.6%

3.1% 3.0%

4.8%

1.0% 1.3%1.9% 1.8%

3.3%

0.5% 0.6%1.1% 1.0%

1.5%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

Total FRL SWD FRL+SWD FRL+SWD+M

Incidents by Socio-Economic Status and Disability Status

1 2 3 4 to 10

6.2%

4.1%

8.2%

2.0%

1.2%

2.8%

1.0%0.5%

1.5%

0.5%0.3%

0.7%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

Total Female Male

Incidents by Sex

1 2 3 4 to 10

SWD: Students with DisabilitiesFRL: Free and Reduced LunchM: Male 36

Incident Types

37

Repeated Interfere Defiance45%

Detrimental Behavior39%

Other violations9%

Fighting/ Assault/ Disorderly4%

Marijuana2%

Destruction of School Property<1%

Repeated Interfere Defiance

Detrimental Behavior

Other violations

Fighting/ Assault/ Disorderly

Marijuana

Destruction of School Property

Alcohol

Dangerous Weapon

Assault (COV)

Drug (non-MJ)

Tobacco

Robbery

Sexual Violence

Other Felony

Incident Types

*

*including e-cigarettes

38

73

2,523

229 125

2,912

659

6521

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Destruction ofSchool Property

DetrimentalBehavior

Fighting/ Assault/Disorderly

Marijuana RepeatedInterfere Defiance

Other Total

Incident Count

39

70 69

76

69

56

69

40

2621

1519

2527

19 17

10 10

1821

1612

8 6

15

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Destruction of SchoolProperty

Detrimental Behavior Fighting/ Assault/Disorderly

Marijuana Other violations Repeated InterfereDefiance

Percent of Total Incidents by Socio-Economic Status and Disability Status

FRL 46% SWD 14% FRL+SWD 8% FRL+SWD+M 4%

SWD: Students with Disabilities (IEPs and 504s)FRL: Free and Reduced LunchM: Male 40

15 1416

11 11

15

23

29

3538

3134

48 47

3741

47

42

1410 11 10 11 10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Destruction of SchoolProperty

Detrimental Behavior Fighting/ Assault/Disorderly

Marijuana Other violations Repeated InterfereDefiance

Percent of total Incidents by Race/Ethnicity

Black or African American 8% Hispanic or Latino 32%

White 50% Other 10%41

Suspensions

42

Suspension Rates by Race/Ethnicity

SuspensionsBlack or African

American

Hispanic or Latino

White Other% of all

Students

0 92.7 95.9 96.8 95.8 96.0

1 5.2 3.2 2.4 3.3 3.0

2 to 8 2.2 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0

43

Suspensions% of all

StudentsFRL SWD Female Male

0 96.0 94.6 92.9 97.9 94.3

1 3.0 4.1 5.0 1.7 4.2

2 to 8 1.0 1.4 2.1 0.5 1.5

Suspension Rates by Socio-Economic Status, Disability Status, and Gender

SWD: Students with Disabilities (IEPs and 504s)FRL: Free and Reduced Lunch

44

Attendance

45

94% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93%91% 91% 91%

89% 87% 87%85%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

Average Daily Attendance

46

21%23% 23% 23% 23% 23% 23%

31% 30% 31%

41%43%

45%46%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Chronic Absence Rate

47

Jeremy Koselak

ACT Schools Update

4848

• Mitchell High School (Year 3)

• Jack Swigert Aerospace Academy (Year 2)

• Galileo School for Math and Science (Year 2)

Priority ACT School Update

Culture of Performance

AcademicSystems

Talent

• On-Time Graduation Rate jumped from 66.6% to 72.3% for SY 2018.

• R180 position finally filled to support reading intervention!

• Math team getting support with data dialogues, planning for increased level of rigor (instructionally and with assessments)

• Exploring Innovation Plan with emphasis on developing a Community School

Mitchell HS (Year 3)

50

• Data dialogues are increasing in specificity, alignment to rigor of the standard (and taking advantage of guided data digs with ANET)

• The team is coaching individual teachers (admin, ACT coach, and ANET coach) to improve instruction, increase focus on aggressive monitoring, and planning for rigor

• Writing emphasis for science, including use of common rubric to drive instructional improvements and classroom interventions

• Improvement over last year with ANET Interim Assessments across all grades, for both math and ELA for both A1 and A2 (exception for 7th Grade ELA and 6th Grade Math which both dropped).

Jack Swigert Aerospace Academy (Year 2)

51

• Addressing attendance and discipline with significant decline in OSS rates after Teen Court Implementation

• Initiating Partnership with TDS to enhance use of EWS

Jack Swigert Aerospace Academy (Year 2)

52

• PLCs have been bolstered, with emphasis on instructional planning, use of assessment data; some teams have improved intervention by name and need

• ACT Instructional coach support, more administrative presence in classrooms and at PLCs.

• Taking advantage of guided data digs

• 6th Grade is getting better at identifying gaps and identifying intervention needs; level of rigor needs a significant uplift

• Formative assessments developed for 7th grade math, aligned to ADB needs

Galileo School for Math and Science (Year 2)

53

• Strong start with AVID, preparing for expansion of school wide strategies

• Culture and Vision: Preparing to host 3 rounds of World CAFÉ (students, parents/community, and staff) to help co-create a vision for GMS.

• Attendance: Consistent, weekly, multi-tiered approach to improve attendance, which is getting the attention of our parents. Our attendance process mimics the MTSS process and our role is to identify the support needed for the family. The process has been defined; the building of plans and documenting support is just beginning to kick off.

• Decrease in the number of referrals/consequences to the office in the month of January and February of 2019 compared to the same months the last 2 years we have had a decrease in the number of suspensions.

Galileo School for Math and Science (Year 2)

54

Appended Slides

5555

English Language Arts - Galileo K-12 ADB 2 -2018

54%

48%

34%36% 37%

27%

45%

37%

26% 27% 26%

17%

44%

37%

24%26% 26%

20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8

%L4

/L5

Achievement Gaps between Student Groups

D11 Minority FRL

56

English Language Arts - Galileo K-12 ADB 2 -2018

59%

52%

33% 35%40%

30%

49%44%

34%37%

34%

24%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


%L4

/L5

Female Male

Achievement Gaps

57

54%

48%

34%36% 37%

27%

36%

26%

19%

24%

14%11%

45%

35%

24% 25% 26%

13%

48%

56%

35% 35%38% 39%

62%

56%

40%

45% 46%

34%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


%L4

/L5


ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Galileo K-12 ADB 2 - 2018

Achievement Gaps between Race/Ethnicity Groups

58

41%43%

18%

29%

10%

26%

55%

36% 36%

12%

22%

7%

18%

45%

33% 33%

12%

19%

6%

21%

46%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8 ALGI (6-8)

%L4

/L5

D11 GK12 Minority FRL

MATHEMATICS - Galileo K-12 ADB 2 - 2018

Percent Met or Exceed between Student Groups:Math – Quarter 2

Achievement Gaps

59

39%42%

16%

26%

9%

27%

52%

43% 44%

21%

32%

10%

24%

58%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


%L4

/L5

Female Male


Percent Met or Exceed by Gender:Math – Quarter 2

Achievement Gaps

60

41%43%

18%

29%

10%

26%

55%

32%

27%

6%

18%

4%

18%

38%

34%36%

11%

21%

7%

15%

42%40%

42%

20%

28%

12%

30%

51%

45%

49%

24%

37%

11%

33%

59%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


%L4

/L5

D11 GK12 Black Hispanic 2 or More White


Achievement Gaps

61

62% 62%

45% 46%

51%48%

58% 57%

47%45%

48%

53%

49%

60%

47%45%

51% 51%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


%L4

/L5


Percent Met Growth Expectations Benchmark 2Student Groups- English Language Arts

Met Growth Gaps

62

65%63%

41%39%

52%

45%

60% 61%

51% 52%50% 51%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


%L4

/L5

Female Male

Percent Met Growth Expectations Benchmark 2by Gender- English Language Arts

Met Growth Gaps

63

Percent Met Growth Benchmark 2Race/ Ethnicity – English Language Arts

62% 62%

45% 46%

51%48%

55% 54%

50%

36%

45%

55%57% 57%

48% 47%

51% 51%

63%61%

42%

50%

40%

50%

66% 66%

55%

47%

54%

45%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


%L4

/L5

Met Growth Gaps


64

Percent Met Growth Benchmark 2Student Groups – Math

51%

70%

30%

52%

40%

53%54%

69%

33%

50%

44%

49%

54%

69%

32%

50%

44%

51%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


%L4

/L5


Met Growth Gaps

65

Percent Met Growth Benchmark 2by Gender – Math

52%

68%

32%

48%

41%

50%49%

72%

28%

57%

39%

57%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


%L4

/L5

Female Male

Achievement Gaps

66

Percent Met Growth Expectations Benchmark 2Race/Ethnicity - Math

62% 62%

45% 46%

51%48%

55% 54%

50%

36%

45%

55%57% 57%

48% 47%

51% 51%

63%61%

42%

50%

40%

50%

66% 66%

55%

47%

54%

45%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


%L4

/L5

Met Growth Gaps


67

Student Average Days MissedGrade

Grade

AmericanIndian or

Native Alaskan

AsianBlack or African

American

Hispanic or Latino

WhitePacific

IslanderTwo or

More RacesFRL SWD Female Male

K 3.8 4.1 5.9 5.6 4.9 4.8 5.8 6.0 8.6 6.9 9.2

1 5.7 4.5 5.2 5.0 4.5 5.6 5.9 5.4 6.3 5.8 6.6

2 5.0 4.2 5.2 5.0 4.6 4.3 5.3 5.3 6.6 5.8 6.9

3 5.7 3.4 4.8 4.4 4.4 6.0 4.8 4.9 5.8 5.8 5.8

4 5.9 3.0 5.3 4.9 4.1 4.3 5.1 5.1 6.0 6.5 5.7

5 6.6 2.5 4.9 4.8 4.6 5.0 4.8 5.1 6.4 6.4 6.4

6 5.2 5.5 5.3 6.3 5.2 5.9 5.6 6.4 8.4 9.8 7.6

7 6.2 3.9 6.4 6.4 5.7 6.2 5.9 7.0 9.0 9.0 9.0

8 7.2 3.8 7.6 7.2 6.0 4.9 6.5 7.3 9.4 9.7 9.2

9 8.2 2.5 8.2 8.1 6.7 7.9 7.2 8.6 8.4 8.3 8.5

10 8.0 5.1 10.4 10.3 7.7 6.1 8.5 10.2 9.7 10.6 9.2

11 14.2 6.8 9.3 10.5 9.4 13.2 10.9 10.7 12.2 12.7 11.9

12 12.6 6.2 14.3 13.2 10.7 23.3 13.7 12.6 11.6 10.2 12.468

68

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Average Days Absent By Grade Level

Black or African American Hispanic or Latino White

69

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


FRL SWD

70

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


Female Male71

4%

18%16%

13%

5%2%

9% 8%

50%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Achieve Bijou School CareerPathways

CoronadoHS

Doherty HS EarlyCollege

Mitchell HS Palmer HS Tesla EOC

9th Grade High Credit Risk

72

100%

39%

23%

14%

47%

9%5%

15% 15%

100%

48%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


73

43%

23%

16%

62%

11%6%

20%17%

71%74%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


74

27%

38%

20%

7%

57%

7%

50%

18%15%

60%64%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


75

Four-Year Graduation Rate Trends by High School

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%


76

quarter 2 data review - co02201641.schoolwires.net€¦ · english language arts –quarter 2 ela...

Documents