quantum mechanics course degenerate pt

Upload: jlbalb

Post on 30-May-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    1/14

    Lecture 21. The Variational Method

    * Degenerate perturbation theory

    The coupled quantum well

    * The Variational method

    The triangular well

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    2/14

    Here we discuss the application of DEGENERATE perturbation theory to the problem ofCOUPLED quantum wells

    * The system we consider is shown below and consists of a well centered on xL andanother that is centered on xR

    This problem CAN be solved exactly using a discussion of T-matrices

    * It seems a reasonable GUESS however that the lowest two states of the double wellshould consist of a MIXTURE of the lowest states (L & R) in each of the two wells

    We therefore develop a treatment of DEGENERATE perturbation theory in termsof these two states

    Degenerate Perturbation Theory

    THE PROBLEM OF COUPLED QUANTUM WELLS THAT WESTUDY HERE IS ANALOGOUS TO THAT OF A DIATOMIC

    MOLECULE

    THECOUPLING STRENGTHBETWEEN THE TWO WELLS

    IS DETERMINED BY THE STRENGTH OF THEIRCOMMON

    BARRIER

    THEGROUND-STATEWAVEFUNCTIONS OF THE TWO

    WELLS ARE ALSO SHOWN

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    3/14

    We begin by writing the Schrdinger equations for the left and right wells INDIVIDUALLYas

    * The next step is to write the wavefunction for the COUPLED system as a linear sum ofsingle-well eigenfunctions

    * With this definition the Schrdinger equation for the coupled system becomes

    Where we have defined the following matrix elements as

    Degenerate Perturbation Theory

    )1.21()(LLL

    VT )2.21()(RRR

    VT

    n

    nna )3.21(

    )4.21( n

    nmn

    n

    nmnaSEaH

    )6.21(*nmmn

    S )5.21(*nmmn

    HH

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    4/14

    While we are used to matrix elements of the form of Smn VANISHING when m n due tothe property of orthonormality this is NOTthe cases here

    * The point here is that the wavefunctions L and R are instead solutions to SEPARATESchrdinger equations

    * The matrix equation to be solved is now a generalized eigenvalue problem

    Degenerate Perturbation Theory

    L RL(x) R(x)

    )7.21(*mnnmmn

    S

    )8.21(ESH aa

    THE EIGENFUNCTIONSL ANDRARENOTORTHONORMALSINCE THEY ARE SOLUTIONS TOSEPARATESCHRDINGER

    EQUATIONS

    THE POINT TO NOTE IS THAT THE TWO WELLS ARESHIFTED

    FROM EACH OTHER BY A DISTANCExR xL

    IF WE CONSIDER ANY GIVEN EIGENSTATE OF THEINDIVIDUAL

    WELLS THEN WECANNOTSAY THATL(x) =R(x)

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    5/14

    The Hamiltonian may be solved here may be written in the form

    * We begin by calculating the matrix element HLL which may be written as

    The additional term c here is referred to as the CRYSTAL FIELD and gives theexpectation value of the added potential VR for the wavefunction L and wedenote this term as

    c to remind us that the potential wells are ATTRACTIVE

    The other DIAGONAL element is of the same form as Eq. 21.10

    Degenerate Perturbation Theory

    )9.21(H

    RRRL

    LRLL

    HH

    HH

    )10.21()(**

    cVVVTHLRLLRLLLL

    )11.21()(**

    cVVVTHRLRRRLRRR

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    6/14

    Similarly it can be shown that the two OFF-DIAGONAL terms are also EQUAL

    * The integral t is referred to as the TRANSFER, TUNNELING or OVERLAP INTEGRAL

    * The integral s results from the NON-ORTHOGONALITY of the basis functions L and Rand from its definition the matrix S that appears in Eq. 21.8 may be written as

    With these results the matrix form of the Schrdinger equation may be written as

    Degenerate Perturbation Theory

    )12.21()(***

    LRLRRLRLRLRRLHtsVVVTH

    )13.21(1

    1S

    s

    s

    )14.21(1

    1aa

    s

    sE

    cts

    tsc

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    7/14

    Solution of Eq. 21.14 requires

    * This yields the following ROOTS

    The approximation of neglecting all HIGHER states that we have employed herewill be valid as long as the overlap integral s is SMALL

    This corresponds to the case where the coupling between the two wells is WEAKand the expressions above can then be expanded as

    Degenerate Perturbation Theory

    )15.21(0det0H)Sdet(

    cEtsEs

    tsEscEE

    )16.21(11

    ,11 s

    t

    s

    cE

    s

    t

    s

    cE

    )17.21()( tcstE

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    8/14

    Eq. 21.17 shows that the effect of the tunneling integral between the wells is to SPLIT theenergy levels of the two wells

    * It is straightforward to show that the wavefunctions corresponding to these energylevels can be written as

    As discussed for molecules these are just the BONDING and ANTI-BONDINGstates where the anti-bonding state is + and has HIGHER energy

    Degenerate Perturbation Theory

    )18.21()( tcstE

    )19.21()(2

    1RL

    INDIVIDUAL WELLS AND THEIR GROUND

    STATE WAVEFUNCTIONS

    BONDINGANDANTI-BONDINGSTATES OF THE

    COUPLEDQUANTUM WELL

    -

    +E-

    E+

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    9/14

    The variational method is a specialized approach that may be used to ACCURATELYestimate the GROUND-STATE energy of a system

    * Obviously we know that this ground state has an associated eigenfunction 1 thatmust satisfy the Schrdinger equation

    * If we multiply both sides of this equation by 1* and integrate we obtain

    * Reorganization of this equation then yields

    The Variational Method

    )20.21(111 H

    )21.21(1

    *

    1111

    *

    11

    *

    1 H

    )22.21(1

    *

    1

    1

    *

    1

    1

    H

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    10/14

    If instead of the eigenfunction 1 we now consider some ARBITRARY wavefunction y thatsatisfies the required boundary conditions then the variational principle asserts that

    * To prove the variational principle we start by expressing the wavefunction y in termsof the TRUE eigenfunctions of the Schrdinger equation

    * With this substitution the RHS of Eq. 21.23 becomes

    The Variational Method

    )23.21(*

    *

    1

    H

    )24.21(n

    nna

    )25.21(*

    *

    *

    *

    n nn

    n nnn

    aa

    aaH

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    11/14

    We thus arrive at the variational principle by noting that the following inequality holds

    * The basic idea of the variational method is to GUESS the form of the wavefunction witha small number of ADJUSTABLE parameters

    These parameters are then adjusted to MINIMIZE the ground-state energy

    * As an APPLICATION of this method we estimate the ground-state energy in aTRIANGULAR well

    We assume the so-called FANG-HOWARD form for the ground state wavefunctionin which the parameter b is allowed to vary FREELY

    The Variational Method

    )26.21(*

    *

    11*

    *

    1

    *

    *

    H

    aa

    aa

    aa

    aa

    n nn

    n nn

    n nn

    n nnn

    )27.21(2

    1exp)(

    bxxx

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    12/14

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    13/14

    To minimize the RHS of Eq. 21.30 we differentiate with respect to b and set theresult to zero

    * The variational principle may then be expressed as

    This result should be compared with the EXACTone found previously for thetriangular well

    The Variational Method

    )31.21(2

    62

    smeE

    b

    )32.21(2

    )(4764.2

    2

    )(

    16

    2433/1

    23/1

    23/1

    1

    m

    eE

    m

    eEss

    3/12

    12

    )(3381.2

    m

    eEE

    s

    VARIATIONAL METHODAGREESWITH

    THE EXACT RESULT TO WITHIN6%!

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt

    14/14

    Homework

    P21.1 Use variational method for solving the Schrodinger equation for the truncatedharmonic oscillator potential

    Use the trial function x)=xexp(-bx) (b is a variational parameter) to calculate anapproximate value for the ground state energy and compare with the exact result.

    0for

    0for2

    1)(

    2

    x

    xkxxV