quantum mechanics course degenerate pt
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
1/14
Lecture 21. The Variational Method
* Degenerate perturbation theory
The coupled quantum well
* The Variational method
The triangular well
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
2/14
Here we discuss the application of DEGENERATE perturbation theory to the problem ofCOUPLED quantum wells
* The system we consider is shown below and consists of a well centered on xL andanother that is centered on xR
This problem CAN be solved exactly using a discussion of T-matrices
* It seems a reasonable GUESS however that the lowest two states of the double wellshould consist of a MIXTURE of the lowest states (L & R) in each of the two wells
We therefore develop a treatment of DEGENERATE perturbation theory in termsof these two states
Degenerate Perturbation Theory
THE PROBLEM OF COUPLED QUANTUM WELLS THAT WESTUDY HERE IS ANALOGOUS TO THAT OF A DIATOMIC
MOLECULE
THECOUPLING STRENGTHBETWEEN THE TWO WELLS
IS DETERMINED BY THE STRENGTH OF THEIRCOMMON
BARRIER
THEGROUND-STATEWAVEFUNCTIONS OF THE TWO
WELLS ARE ALSO SHOWN
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
3/14
We begin by writing the Schrdinger equations for the left and right wells INDIVIDUALLYas
* The next step is to write the wavefunction for the COUPLED system as a linear sum ofsingle-well eigenfunctions
* With this definition the Schrdinger equation for the coupled system becomes
Where we have defined the following matrix elements as
Degenerate Perturbation Theory
)1.21()(LLL
VT )2.21()(RRR
VT
n
nna )3.21(
)4.21( n
nmn
n
nmnaSEaH
)6.21(*nmmn
S )5.21(*nmmn
HH
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
4/14
While we are used to matrix elements of the form of Smn VANISHING when m n due tothe property of orthonormality this is NOTthe cases here
* The point here is that the wavefunctions L and R are instead solutions to SEPARATESchrdinger equations
* The matrix equation to be solved is now a generalized eigenvalue problem
Degenerate Perturbation Theory
L RL(x) R(x)
)7.21(*mnnmmn
S
)8.21(ESH aa
THE EIGENFUNCTIONSL ANDRARENOTORTHONORMALSINCE THEY ARE SOLUTIONS TOSEPARATESCHRDINGER
EQUATIONS
THE POINT TO NOTE IS THAT THE TWO WELLS ARESHIFTED
FROM EACH OTHER BY A DISTANCExR xL
IF WE CONSIDER ANY GIVEN EIGENSTATE OF THEINDIVIDUAL
WELLS THEN WECANNOTSAY THATL(x) =R(x)
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
5/14
The Hamiltonian may be solved here may be written in the form
* We begin by calculating the matrix element HLL which may be written as
The additional term c here is referred to as the CRYSTAL FIELD and gives theexpectation value of the added potential VR for the wavefunction L and wedenote this term as
c to remind us that the potential wells are ATTRACTIVE
The other DIAGONAL element is of the same form as Eq. 21.10
Degenerate Perturbation Theory
)9.21(H
RRRL
LRLL
HH
HH
)10.21()(**
cVVVTHLRLLRLLLL
)11.21()(**
cVVVTHRLRRRLRRR
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
6/14
Similarly it can be shown that the two OFF-DIAGONAL terms are also EQUAL
* The integral t is referred to as the TRANSFER, TUNNELING or OVERLAP INTEGRAL
* The integral s results from the NON-ORTHOGONALITY of the basis functions L and Rand from its definition the matrix S that appears in Eq. 21.8 may be written as
With these results the matrix form of the Schrdinger equation may be written as
Degenerate Perturbation Theory
)12.21()(***
LRLRRLRLRLRRLHtsVVVTH
)13.21(1
1S
s
s
)14.21(1
1aa
s
sE
cts
tsc
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
7/14
Solution of Eq. 21.14 requires
* This yields the following ROOTS
The approximation of neglecting all HIGHER states that we have employed herewill be valid as long as the overlap integral s is SMALL
This corresponds to the case where the coupling between the two wells is WEAKand the expressions above can then be expanded as
Degenerate Perturbation Theory
)15.21(0det0H)Sdet(
cEtsEs
tsEscEE
)16.21(11
,11 s
t
s
cE
s
t
s
cE
)17.21()( tcstE
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
8/14
Eq. 21.17 shows that the effect of the tunneling integral between the wells is to SPLIT theenergy levels of the two wells
* It is straightforward to show that the wavefunctions corresponding to these energylevels can be written as
As discussed for molecules these are just the BONDING and ANTI-BONDINGstates where the anti-bonding state is + and has HIGHER energy
Degenerate Perturbation Theory
)18.21()( tcstE
)19.21()(2
1RL
INDIVIDUAL WELLS AND THEIR GROUND
STATE WAVEFUNCTIONS
BONDINGANDANTI-BONDINGSTATES OF THE
COUPLEDQUANTUM WELL
-
+E-
E+
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
9/14
The variational method is a specialized approach that may be used to ACCURATELYestimate the GROUND-STATE energy of a system
* Obviously we know that this ground state has an associated eigenfunction 1 thatmust satisfy the Schrdinger equation
* If we multiply both sides of this equation by 1* and integrate we obtain
* Reorganization of this equation then yields
The Variational Method
)20.21(111 H
)21.21(1
*
1111
*
11
*
1 H
)22.21(1
*
1
1
*
1
1
H
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
10/14
If instead of the eigenfunction 1 we now consider some ARBITRARY wavefunction y thatsatisfies the required boundary conditions then the variational principle asserts that
* To prove the variational principle we start by expressing the wavefunction y in termsof the TRUE eigenfunctions of the Schrdinger equation
* With this substitution the RHS of Eq. 21.23 becomes
The Variational Method
)23.21(*
*
1
H
)24.21(n
nna
)25.21(*
*
*
*
n nn
n nnn
aa
aaH
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
11/14
We thus arrive at the variational principle by noting that the following inequality holds
* The basic idea of the variational method is to GUESS the form of the wavefunction witha small number of ADJUSTABLE parameters
These parameters are then adjusted to MINIMIZE the ground-state energy
* As an APPLICATION of this method we estimate the ground-state energy in aTRIANGULAR well
We assume the so-called FANG-HOWARD form for the ground state wavefunctionin which the parameter b is allowed to vary FREELY
The Variational Method
)26.21(*
*
11*
*
1
*
*
H
aa
aa
aa
aa
n nn
n nn
n nn
n nnn
)27.21(2
1exp)(
bxxx
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
12/14
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
13/14
To minimize the RHS of Eq. 21.30 we differentiate with respect to b and set theresult to zero
* The variational principle may then be expressed as
This result should be compared with the EXACTone found previously for thetriangular well
The Variational Method
)31.21(2
62
smeE
b
)32.21(2
)(4764.2
2
)(
16
2433/1
23/1
23/1
1
m
eE
m
eEss
3/12
12
)(3381.2
m
eEE
s
VARIATIONAL METHODAGREESWITH
THE EXACT RESULT TO WITHIN6%!
-
8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course Degenerate Pt
14/14
Homework
P21.1 Use variational method for solving the Schrodinger equation for the truncatedharmonic oscillator potential
Use the trial function x)=xexp(-bx) (b is a variational parameter) to calculate anapproximate value for the ground state energy and compare with the exact result.
0for
0for2
1)(
2
x
xkxxV