quality improvement in family practice - acfp · quality improvement in family practice: “el...

37
Quality Improvement in Family Practice: “El Camino se hace al andar” 61 Annual Scientific Assembly Alberta College of Family Physicians Banff Alberta March 2016 Dr Rob Wedel MD CCFP FCFP Family Physician, Taber, Alberta

Upload: nguyencong

Post on 17-Sep-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Quality Improvement in Family Practice:El Camino se hace al andar

    61 Annual Scientific Assembly Alberta College of Family Physicians

    Banff AlbertaMarch 2016

    Dr Rob Wedel MD CCFP FCFPFamily Physician, Taber, Alberta

  • Faculty/Presenter Disclosure

    Faculty/Presenter: Rob Wedel

    Relationships with commercial interests:Grants/Research Support: Not applicableSpeakers Bureau/Honoraria: Not applicableConsulting Fees: Not applicable Other: This presentation has received financial

    support from the Alberta College of Family Physicians in the form of a speaker fee.

  • Objectives: Discuss the conditions that contribute to successful

    improvement initiatives in our clinics, and our role as physicians in those initiatives

    Discuss Improvement techniques and supports that can be applied within our family practice clinic

    Discuss the elements of the PMH, and the role they can play in guiding Improvement activities in our clinics

    Describe practical examples of QI initiatives that have made a measurable difference in quality of care of a family practice clinic.

  • New Approach to primary medical care: Nine Point Plan for family practice

    1. Practice registration (patient enrollment)2. A system of blended funding (salary, Capitation,

    incentives)3. Primary care through interprofessional teams4. A balance between preventative, curative, and palliative

    services5. central health records6. Computerized databases7. Use of health targets8. Local authority with fiscal responsibility for coordinating

    care9. A managed system

    Forster et al, New Approach to Primary Medical Care, Canadian Family Physician, Sept 1994 http://www.researchgate.net/publication/15279277

  • Framework for Surveillance of Chronic Disease

    A. Identify Patient PopulationB. Multidimensional AssessmentC. Systematic, proactive MonitoringD. Consistent assessment toolsE. Patient Education in Self and Family CareF. Integration of Evidence based care/practice

    guidelinesG. Coordination of careH. Rapid Response in Crisis

    Dr. Ed Wagner. Chronic Care Model. 1985

  • New Script, same old Play?

    Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada. Building on Values: The future of Health Care in Canada ( Romanow, Ottawa:2003) Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. The Health of Canadians the Federal Role, Final Report on the State of the Health Care System in Canada (Kirby, Ottawa: 2003) Alberta, Premiers Advisory Council on Health. A Framework for Reform. (Mazenkowski, Edmonton:2001) Saskatchewan Commission on Medicare. Caring for Medicare, Sustaining a Quality System (Fyke, Saskatoon: 2001) Ontario Health Services Restructuring Commission. Looking Back, Looking Forward, A Legacy Report (Toronto:2000) Quebec Study Commission on Health Services and Social Services. Emerging Solutions, Report and Recommendations (Quebec:2000) Health Services Review Committee. Fredericton:1999

    Jeffery Simpson, Globe and Mail editorial, Jan 8, 2004New script, same old play?

    Reform primary health care. (pick a model, any model)

  • New Script, same old Play? Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada. Romanow, Ottawa:2003 Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Kirby, Ottawa: 2003 Alberta, Premiers Advisory Council on Health. Mazenkowski, Edmonton:2001 Saskatchewan Commission on Medicare. Fyke, Saskatoon: 2001 Ontario Health Services Restructuring Commission. Toronto:2000 Quebec Study Commission on Health Services and Social Services. 2000 Health Services Review Committee. Fredericton:1999Jeffery Simpson, Globe and Mail editorial, 2004: Reform primary health care.

    Office of the Auditor General of Alberta 2012

    CFPC. A Vision for Family Practice. The Patients Medical Home. 2011 PCN Evolution. VISION AND FRAMEWORK. Report to the Minister of Health. AMA

    Primary Care Alliance Board . 2013 Expert Committee on Strengthening PHC in Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Health.

    Patient Care Groups: A new model of population based primary health care for Ontario. Price et al. 2015

  • The Evidentiary Vacuum Discussions of innovations in primary care invariably take

    place in an evidentiary vacuum. Strong evidence is lacking to support the superiority of any one model...Hutchison B et al. Primary care in Canada: so much innovation, so little change.

    Health Affairs 2001

    Evidence from recent Canadian experience is that primary health care can be transformed through a process that is voluntary and incremental. This emerging vision (Patients Medical Home) offers opportunities to those ready to embrace innovation without imposing changes on the remainder. Hutchison B et al. Primary Care in Canada: Systems in Motion.

    The Milbank Quarterly. 2011

  • The Science of ImprovementThe Evidentiary Vacuum?

    The RCT-The gold standard of Best Evidence in clinical practice Quality Assurance-The establishment of Best Standards in care Quality Improvement -A focus on the Best Quality of care

    A new science Interventions (process, idea) made within a unique social context (clinics,

    teams, systems) to produce the multidimensional changes required for improvement

    implementation of guideline based medicine CPGs processes of care- timely access, efficiency, patient safety Integration of care- teams/systems that work

    Multiple models LEAN, Six Sigma, etc alone or combined (AlbertaAIM)-all intended to provide us easier and better ways of getting improvement faster.

    Donald Berwick. The Science of Improvement. JAMA. 2008

  • The Science of Improvement

    AIMSMART-Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely

    TEAMThe people that do the work have to change the work

    MAPMEASURE

    Access (TNA), Continuity/Panel, Quality of Care

    CHANGEPDSAsSUSTAINDonald Berwick. The Science of Improvement. JAMA. 2008

  • The Science of Improvement: Quality Improvement is not Quality Assurance

    Quality Improvement Proactive Focuses on all aspects of

    care Improves processes to

    improve outcomes Focuses on system

    performance; non-judgmental culture; developing best practices

    Quality Assurance Reactive Focuses on defects and

    activities below target Accreditation = pass/fail

    of minimum standard

    12

  • No one wants to talk M%@$~#*!*^&(Measurement)

    Measurement is about improving patient experience and outcomes by changing and refining the health care system rather than judging it.

    At the clinic level, measurement is about identifying problems, and recognizing opportunities for improvement.

    At the PCN level, aggregated data can inform the sharing of successful improvement strategies across clinics within the network.

    At the provincial level, aggregate data monitors the performance of the health system and ensures transparency and accountability to Albertans.

    Multiple supports available to us in our province. PCNs, PMO, HQCA, AIM, etc

    Primary Care News. PCN PMO. Dec 2015

  • The Concern...While once Canada was seen in middle of

    the pack in primary care (Starfield 2002), other countries of similar wealth and health systems have advanced and left us behind. 2015 Commonwealth Fund Survey Naylor Report. Health Canada Oct 2015 (www.healthycanadians.gc.ca)

    Canada seems to have stalled in its commitment to strengthening primary care...In this regard, Canada is probably at least 10 years behind.

    Barbara Starfield, 2008

  • Elements of the Commonwealth Fund Survey

    Dimension of Care Grade

    Access to care

    Timeliness of Care

    Cost as a barrier to health care access

    Coordination of care

    With specialists and hospitals

    Between primary care visits

    With home care and social services

    IT adoption

    Computerized care decision support

    Electronic communication with patients

    Performance Measurement

    Measuring patient outcomes and experience

    Monitoring preventive care

  • How Canada Compares Timely access remains the lowest of the OECD countries. ER visits per capita are the highest of any other country. Coordination of care between primary care doctors and other home care

    and social services is lower. Use of EMRs to support decisions of care is not standard practice in

    Canada. Canadian primary care doctors are considerably less likely

    To assess/measure performance, and to track progress (17% versus 37%).

    To routinely review surveys on patient satisfaction and experiences (17% versus 47%)

    However, Canadian physicians working in primary care models (PCNs, FHNs, FHTs) had better overall results than their Canadian peers.

    How Canada Compares: Results from the 2015 Commonwealth Fund Survey. CIHR. CIHI. Jan 2016

  • Most provinces are below the international average in use of performance measurement.

    How do the provinces compare?

    18

    B.C. Alta. Sask. Man. Ont. Que. N.B. N.S. N.L. Can. CMWF avg.

    Have reviewed their own clinical performance against targets at least annually

    45% 29% 42% 43% 65% 13% 38% 38% 33% 41% 52%

    Routinely receive information on how the clinical performance of their practice compares with that of other practices

    24% 8% 15% 20% 31% 1% 8% 17% 6% 17% 37%

    Proportion of primary care doctors who

  • Quality Improvement in small office settings

    Benefits identified- More appropriate, effective patient care Greater practice efficiency and safety Improved timeliness of care Improved patient outcomes Improved revenue Clinic staff and patient satisfaction/retention Improved practice reputation with patients and community

    Woflson et al. Quality Improvement in small office settings: an examination of successful practices. BMC Family Practice. 2009, 10:14

  • Quality Improvement in small office settings Internal Facilitators

    Intrinsic professional motivation to provide better care

    a Physician champion an Idea and Improvement champion (vs. Financial incentives)

    teamness of the practice An office culture that values and supports improvement work A sense of empowerment within the team

    Success breeds success- QI gains momentum with each new effort

    Woflson et al. Quality Improvement in small office settings: an examination of successful practices. BMC Family Practice. 2009, 10:14

  • The Physician Champion The physician champion:

    is committed to improving care they provide to their patients willing to change personally in order to do so Actively supports the team, through encouragement,

    empowerment to suggest and make improvements, visibility, participation

    Is a respected physician, a strong listener and negotiator, able and willing to take initiative as needed.

    has the networks necessary to identify experts and consultants with experience in QI to help facilitate the changes.

    acts as a liaison between their practice and the health care system

  • Quality Improvement in small office settings

    Internal Facilitators Intrinsic professional motivation to provide better care teamness of the practice

    collective values and shared vision office culture that values and supports improvement work generates a sense of empowerment within the team clear delineation of shared responsibilities routine interaction between doctors and staff. Cooperation/commitment of physicians and other

    clinical/support staff

    Woflson et al. Quality Improvement in small office settings: an examination of successful practices. BMC Family Practice. 2009, 10:14

  • Outcomes: Access(Time to Next Available Appt.)

    Delay

    Delay

    Data Entry Instructions: At the SAME TIME EACH WEEK, calculate the time to third next appointment for each provider and enter it into the corresponding field. Enter the name of the provider or service in the cells labelled "Provider X"

    Graph Instructions: A delay chart for the clinic (average wait) will be automatically created on the next tab.

    Week beginning:Clinic Average

    8/1/0533.7777777778

    8/8/0534.6666666667

    8/15/0528.9

    8/22/0528.1

    8/29/0533.6

    9/5/0531.1

    9/12/0528.2

    9/19/0525.1

    9/26/0532.3

    10/3/0531.3

    10/10/0531.5

    10/17/0530.3

    10/24/0529.8

    10/31/0531.2

    11/7/0533

    11/14/0529.7

    11/21/0535.8

    11/28/0534.9

    12/5/0533.2

    12/12/0532.4

    12/19/0530

    12/26/0527.5

    1/2/0626.6

    1/9/0624.1

    1/16/0611.7

    1/23/068.6

    1/30/0613.6

    2/6/0615.3

    2/13/0613.4

    2/20/0613.8

    2/27/0613.1

    3/6/0613.4

    3/13/0613.8

    3/20/0610.1

    3/27/069.2

    4/3/0614.1

    4/10/0615.7

    4/17/0615.8

    4/24/0613.4

    5/1/0612.8

    5/8/0611.1

    5/15/069.2

    5/22/065.6

    5/29/0612.8

    6/5/0610.5

    6/12/0611.2

    6/19/0610.6

    6/26/0613

    7/3/0610.8

    7/10/0611.4

    7/17/0613

    7/24/0618.5

    7/31/0615.8

    8/7/0613.2

    8/14/0614

    8/21/0614.6363636364

    8/28/0615.6363636364

    9/4/068.4545454545

    9/11/0613.3636363636

    9/18/0610

    9/25/0614.5454545455

    10/2/0613.6363636364

    10/9/0610.1818181818

    10/16/067.7272727273

    10/23/067.3636363636

    10/30/066.9090909091

    11/6/067.3636363636

    11/13/062.8181818182

    11/20/06

    11/27/06

    12/4/068.3076923077

    12/11/066.6153846154

    12/18/069.25

    12/25/06

    1/1/078.0833333333

    1/8/0711.4166666667

    1/15/077.5

    1/22/076.9166666667

    1/29/0714.9

    2/5/0713.2

    2/12/0710.5

    2/19/0711.3

    2/26/0713.4

    3/5/079.8

    3/12/0712.1

    3/19/0714.3

    3/26/0715.9

    4/2/0712.8

    4/9/0712.9090909091

    4/16/0712.5454545455

    4/23/0712.8181818182

    4/30/076

    5/7/077.7272727273

    5/14/078.5454545455

    5/21/077.6363636364

    5/28/077.6363636364

    6/4/076.8181818182

    6/11/0710.7272727273

    6/18/0711.2727272727

    6/25/0713.0909090909

    7/2/079.7272727273

    7/9/078.2222222222

    7/16/0712.5555555556

    7/23/0711.3333333333

    7/30/079.4444444444

    8/6/079.1111111111

    8/13/0717.6666666667

    8/20/0714.2222222222

    8/27/076.7777777778

    9/3/075.3333333333

    9/10/075.4444444444

    9/17/078.4444444444

    9/24/078

    10/1/078.1111111111

    10/8/0712.3333333333

    10/15/0712.2222222222

    10/22/0712.5555555556

    10/29/0710.8888888889

    11/5/0711.5555555556

    11/12/076.8888888889

    11/19/073.4444444444

    11/26/078.2222222222

    12/3/073.5555555556

    12/10/073.5555555556

    12/17/07

    12/24/07

    12/31/07

    1/7/08

    1/14/08

    1/21/08

    1/28/08

    2/4/08

    2/11/08

    2/18/08

    2/25/08

    3/3/08

    3/10/08

    3/17/08

    3/24/08

    3/31/08

    4/7/08

    4/14/08

    4/21/08

    4/28/08

    5/5/08

    5/12/08

    5/19/08

    5/26/08

    6/2/08

    6/9/08

    6/16/08

    6/23/08

    6/30/08

    7/7/08

    7/14/08

    7/21/08

    7/28/08

    8/4/08

    8/11/08

    8/18/08

    8/25/08

    9/1/08

    9/8/08

    9/15/08

    9/22/08

    9/29/08

    10/6/08

    10/13/08

    10/20/08

    10/27/08

    11/3/08

    11/10/08

    11/17/08

    11/24/08

    12/1/08

    12/8/08

    12/15/08

    12/22/08

    12/29/08

    1/5/09

    1/12/09

    1/19/09

    1/26/09

    2/2/09

    2/9/09

    2/16/09

    2/23/09

    3/2/09

    3/9/09

    3/16/09

    3/23/09

    3/30/09

    4/6/09

    4/13/09

    4/20/09

    4/27/09

    Delay Chart

    33.7777777778

    34.6666666667

    28.9

    28.1

    33.6

    31.1

    28.2

    25.1

    32.3

    31.3

    31.5

    30.3

    29.8

    31.2

    33

    29.7

    35.8

    34.9

    33.2

    32.4

    30

    27.5

    26.6

    24.1

    11.7

    8.6

    13.6

    15.3

    13.4

    13.8

    13.1

    13.4

    13.8

    10.1

    9.2

    14.1

    15.7

    15.8

    13.4

    12.8

    11.1

    9.2

    5.6

    12.8

    10.5

    11.2

    10.6

    13

    10.8

    11.4

    13

    18.5

    15.8

    13.2

    14

    14.6363636364

    15.6363636364

    8.4545454545

    13.3636363636

    10

    14.5454545455

    13.6363636364

    10.1818181818

    7.7272727273

    7.3636363636

    6.9090909091

    7.3636363636

    2.8181818182

    39041

    39048

    8.3076923077

    6.6153846154

    9.25

    39076

    8.0833333333

    11.4166666667

    7.5

    6.9166666667

    14.9

    13.2

    10.5

    11.3

    13.4

    9.8

    12.1

    14.3

    15.9

    12.8

    12.9090909091

    12.5454545455

    12.8181818182

    6

    7.7272727273

    8.5454545455

    7.6363636364

    7.6363636364

    6.8181818182

    10.7272727273

    11.2727272727

    13.0909090909

    9.7272727273

    8.2222222222

    12.5555555556

    11.3333333333

    9.4444444444

    9.1111111111

    17.6666666667

    14.2222222222

    6.7777777778

    5.3333333333

    5.4444444444

    8.4444444444

    8

    8.1111111111

    12.3333333333

    12.2222222222

    12.5555555556

    10.8888888889

    11.5555555556

    6.8888888889

    3.4444444444

    8.2222222222

    3.5555555556

    3.5555555556

    Clinic Average

  • Quality Improvement in small office settings

    External Facilitators Available external resources, like Learning

    Collaboratives, facilitators committed internal resources, including the staff time

    needed to engineer new office practices Decision support, including systems to initiate

    performance assessment and track progress Support from national and provincial professional

    organizationsWoflson et al. Quality Improvement in small office settings: an examination of successful practices. BMC Family Practice. 2009, 10:14

  • Quality Improvement in small office settings Barriers

    Time constraints Internal cost (staff time, equipment) Resistance of clinical staff External pressure

    loss of autonomy increasing responsibility with heightened expectations from

    patients, payers, insurers, and regulators. changing remuneration arrangements

    Woflson et al. Quality Improvement in small office settings: an examination of successful practices. BMC Family Practice. 2009, 10:14

  • Time Constraints

    Most physicians report overall career satisfaction, but perceive themselves on a treadmill, with increased expectations and erosion of autonomy. Suggested Strategies to ease practice burdens and

    empower physicians include increased use and enhanced scope of non-physician clinicians, adoption of IT and disease management programs to safety and

    effectiveness thoughtful practice design to improve efficiency and quality.

    Mechanic D. Physician Discontent: New Demands and the importance of Time. Organizational Modifications and Chronic Disease Models. JAMA. 2003Gillette R. Turtles and Rabbits: Family Physicians Under Time Pressure.FamPracManag. 1999.

  • Resistance and Cooperation of physicians and other clinical staff

    Taber - Phase 1 Clinic with AVG TTTN data by quarter for 10 physicians

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    65

    70

    last q

    uarte

    r 05

    1st q

    uarte

    r 06

    2nd

    quar

    ter 0

    6

    3rd

    quar

    ter 0

    6

    4th

    quar

    ter 0

    6

    1st q

    uarte

    r 07

    2nd

    quar

    ter 0

    7

    3rd

    quar

    ter 0

    7

    4th

    quar

    ter 0

    7

    1st q

    uarte

    r 08

    2nd

    quar

    ter 0

    8

    3rd

    quar

    ter 0

    8

    4th

    quar

    ter 0

    8

    2005 to end of 2008

    TTTN

    Day

    s

    Chart1

    45.2941176471last quarter 0544.764705882427.176470588229.176470588214.5294117647last quarter 051547.352941176563.1176470588

    24.23076923081st quarter 0623.3076923077012.07692307698.07692307691st quarter 069.153846153823.615384615424.2307692308

    182nd quarter 0617.46153846157.92307692318.15384615385.61538461542nd quarter 066.692307692315.923076923115

    19.92307692313rd quarter 0620.15384615387.769230769210.84615384627.384615384613.66666666677.461538461518.076923076919.8461538462

    254th quarter 068.453.33.88.211.110.88.3

    22.15384615381st quarter 0720.15384615381st quarter 079.07692307695.307692307715.9230769231618.307692307714

    23.92307692312nd quarter 0716.46153846156.55.53846153853.769230769216.84615384627.153846153816.23076923089.3076923077

    22.23076923083rd quarter 0711.69230769238.615384615411.15384615382.846153846213.61538461543.6153846154105.1538461538

    9.78571428574th quarter 0716.78571428571.42857142867.7142857143213.64285714293.428571428612.28571428573.7142857143

    14.8461538462015.153846153800.38461538461.15384615388.07692307694.076923076914.23076923086

    8.9013.15.40.112.71.79.61.5

    11.84615384621.07692307699.38461538463.461538461501.15384615384.53846153853.69230769237.46153846154.5384615385

    6.75149.18181818180.63636363642.09090909091.818181818241.63636363649.54545454554.8181818182

    Beckie

    Bester

    Christensen

    Chychota

    Demontigny

    WadeSteed

    Torrie

    Wesley Steed

    Wedel

    Yamabe

    2005 to end of 2008

    TTTN Days

    Taber - Phase 1 Clinic with AVG TTTN data by quarter for 10 physicians

    Sheet2

    If starting a new practise. Take TTTN 1st average 2 months after they have been practising for 6 months.

    NotesAverageaverage

    PhaseClinicPhysicianfor March 20091st 2 months/1st 8 measurementslast 2 monthsdifference20052006200720082009

    1pincherGelber9.385.004.389

    1pincherCameron5.755.500.255

    1pincherIrving11.131.389.7512

    1pincherRottger28.2520.387.8830

    1pincherScrimshaw27.7516.0011.7528

    1pincherdeWet7.387.75-0.389

    1pincherBrunner28.1325.632.5033

    1pincherJacksonLeft practise15

    1pincherParkerLeft practise9

    1pincherTBurton

  • What we Know WorksThe Medical Home The greater the range of services provided by primary care clinic,

    along with a family physician providing a continuous care relationship to a defined patient population had one third lower overall costs and were 19% less likely to die

    Attachment to a practice was more significant than all other variables, such as age.

    For most aspects of care and health outcomes, identification of a particular practitioner provides even better services than mere identification of a particular place.

    Starfield B, Shi L. Policy relevant determinants of health: an international perspective. Health Policy. 2002;603:201218The Future of Family Medicine. Annals of Family Medicine, 2004 Hollander, MJ, et al. Increasing Value for Money in the Canadian Healthcare System: New Findings on the Contribution of Primary Care Services. Healthcare Quarterly Vol.12 No.4 2009

  • The Patients Medical HomeThe Pillars

    The Patients Medical HomePatients receive care that is centered on their needs from a

    team that knows their story

    http://www.patientsmedicalhome.ca

  • The Patients Medical HomeThe Pillars

    The Patients Medical HomePatients receive care that is centered on their needs from a

    team that knows their story

    Clinical Supports provided by the Medical HomeTimely Access to care and information Team based Care

    Continuity to personal family doctor Comprehensive, Coordinated care

  • The Patients Medical HomeThe Pillars

    The Patients Medical HomePatients receive care that is centered on their needs from a

    team that knows their story

    System Supports for the Medical HomeProvincial Support Programs Integrated Information Systems/EvaluationSupportive Payment Structures Workforce Development

  • Patient Centered Medical Home:Impact on Cost and QualityAggregated outcomes from 28 Peer reviewed articles and government program evaluations

    Statistically significant improvements in:

    SatisfactionAccessQualityCostutilization

  • What do we know works in CanadaPractices that provide the best, most effective care... Enhance capacity through effective patient flow processes, focusing

    on eliminating delays for appointments and at appointments.

    have a sound knowledge of patient population, and of their community resources. (Four Principles of Family Medicine)

    Have pre planned and prepared for patient encounters, using protocols and guidelines to support collaborative team-based care, whether co-located or not

    Have a strong emphasis on self management

    Use and share sophisticated electronic medical records that include clinical decision support, prompts, reminders, registries, communication tools for other providers, etc

    Use continuous measurement and evaluation to inform changeKatz, Glasier et al. Applying what works in Canada: Closing the Gap. CHSRF Working Group. Jan 2008

  • What do our patients value? The single most important

    issue for Canadians is poor access to health services. (p>0.01) Access to primary care (for appts) Timeliness at the appointment Respect and empathy Time available in the consultation Medication and Treatment costs

    Delay in seeing a doctor and getting treatment is the longest among the seven developed countries.

    (2015 Commonwealth Fund Survey)

    Physicians prioritize: ER visits Self efficacy Multidisciplinary teams Collaboration between

    healthcare organizations Self care support Technical quality of Chronic

    disease management Physical activity counselling

    Boivin et al. Implementation Science 2014, 9:24. http://www.implementationscience.com/content/9/1/24

  • Patients Medical Home-Links to Resources:

    CFPC Best Advice: www.patientsmedicalhome.ca Compilation of Resource Tools:

    http://www.topalbertadoctors.org/file/pmh-implementation-field-kit.docx Compilation of PMH Evidence:

    http://www.topalbertadoctors.org/file/top--evidence-summary--benefits-of-pmh.pdf Advanced Access, Measurement Tools:

    www.albertaaim.ca/index.php/resources Panel Management, Team based care:

    www.pcnevolution.ca; www.pcnpmo.ca http://www.albertaaim.ca/index.php/resources/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqGsHB3vvj0&feature=youtu.be

    McMaster U: Quality Book of Tools. 2010 http://qualitybookoftools.ca/wp-login.php

    http://www.topalbertadoctors.org/file/pmh-implementation-field-kit.docxhttp://www.albertaaim.ca/index.php/resourceshttp://www.pcnevolution.cahttp://www.pcnpmo.cahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqGsHB3vvj0&feature=youtu.be

  • Take the leap. we will build our wings on the way down.

    Donald Berwick

    El Camino Se hace al andar

    wanderer, there is no path,the path is made by walking.

    Antonio Machoda 1939

    Quality Improvement in Family Practice:El Camino se hace al andarFaculty/Presenter DisclosureObjectives:Slide Number 4New Approach to primary medical care: Nine Point Plan for family practice Framework for Surveillance of Chronic DiseaseNew Script, same old Play? New Script, same old Play? The Evidentiary Vacuum The Science of ImprovementThe Science of Improvement The Science of Improvement: Quality Improvement is not Quality AssuranceNo one wants to talk M%@$~#*!*^&(Measurement)The Concern...Slide Number 15Elements of the Commonwealth Fund SurveyHow Canada ComparesHow do the provinces compare?Quality Improvement in small office settings Quality Improvement in small office settings The Physician ChampionQuality Improvement in small office settings Outcomes: Access (Time to Next Available Appt.)Slide Number 24Quality Improvement in small office settings Quality Improvement in small office settings Time ConstraintsResistance and Cooperation of physicians and other clinical staffWhat we Know WorksThe Patients Medical HomeThe PillarsThe Patients Medical HomeThe PillarsThe Patients Medical HomeThe PillarsPatient Centered Medical Home:Impact on Cost and QualityWhat do we know works in CanadaWhat do our patients value?Patients Medical Home-Links to Resources: