SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

1. Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes2. Curriculum Design and Organization3. Laboratories and Computing Facilities4. Student Support and Guidance5. Faculty6. Process Control7. Institutional Facilities8. Institutional Support

Criterion-3: Laboratories & Computing FacilitiesIntent: Laboratories and computing facilities must be adequately available and accessible to faculty members and students to support teaching and research activities. In addition departments may benchmark with similar departments in reputable institutions to identify their shortcomings if any.

Criterion-4: Student Support & Advising

Intent: Student must have an adequate support to complete the program in a timely manner and must have ample opportunity to interact with their instructors and receive timely advice about program requirements and career alternatives.

Criterion-5: Process Control

Intent: The processes by which major functions are delivered must be in place, controlled, periodically reviewed and continuously improved. To meet this criterion a set of standards must be satisfied.

Criterion-6: Faculty

Intent: Faculty members must be current and active in their discipline and have the necessary technical depth and breadth to support the program. There must be enough faculty members to provide continuity and stability, to cover the curriculum adequately and effectively, and to allow for scholarly activities.

Criterion-7: Institutional Facilities

Intent: Institutional facilities, including library, computing facilities, classrooms and offices must be adequate to support the objective of the program.

Criterion-8: Institutional Support

Intent: The institution’s support and the financial resources for the program must be sufficient to provide an environment in which the program can achieve its objectives and retain its strength.

6

Latest Status of Faculty of Economics & Management SciencesDepartment Program Teams SAR

receivedSent back for changes

SAR received after improvement

Audit completed

Executive Summary

Implementation Plan

Department of Economics

√Prof. Dr. Khuda

DadDr. Hafiz Khalil

Ahmad

x x x x x x

Department of Library & Information Sciences

√ Prof. Dr. Kanwal

AminDr. Nousheen

Fatima Warriach

Ms. Syeda Hina Batool

√ √ √ √ √ √

Institute of Administrative Sciences

√Ms. Ayesha HanifMs. Saba YaseenMr. Ali Rehman

√ √ √ √ √ √

Institute of Business Administration

√ Prof. Dr. M. Ehsan

MalikMs. Saba Latif

x x x x x x

Institute of Business & Information Technology

√ Mr. Mansoor

Mahmood Ashiq

Mr. Asim Tanveer

√ √ x x x x

SURVEY FORMS

Teacher & Course Evaluation FormProforma - 1 Student Course Evaluation QuestionnaireProforma - 2 Faculty Course Review ReportProforma - 3 Survey of Graduating StudentsProforma - 4 Research Student Progress Review FormProforma - 5 Faculty SurveyProforma - 6 Survey of Department Offering Ph.D. ProgramsProforma - 7 Alumni SurveyProforma - 8 Employer SurveyProforma - 9 Faculty ResumeProforma - 10 Teacher Evaluation FormTeaching / Learning Process Survey Form

REVIEW

Meeting for Expediting Self Assessment Activities of Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences held on 30-09-2010 (Tuesday) in the committee room of Dean Faculty of Economics & Management Sciences, University of the Punjab.

PROGRESS:

Follow up with the Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences for the submission of their SARs is done but overall response rate is very slow.

LATEST STAUTS OF QEC

Program Teams for most of the departments/ institutes/ colleges/ centers have been formed.

Self Assessment Reports of 38 departments/ institutes/ colleges/ centers have been received and reviewed by QEC according to Self Assessment Manual (SAM).

At the same time, executive summaries & implementation plans of 19 audited departments/ institutes/ colleges/ centers have been sent to the respective departments, HEC and Worthy Vice Chancellor of the University for further necessary action to enhance the quality of education.

TEACHERS & COURSES EVALUATION

In order to enhance the quality of education, QEC has already circulated newly developed survey forms related to the teachers and courses evaluation.

HODs will interact & coordinate with QEC staff to conduct survey at the end of each semester and also bring any change if required.

FUTURE PLAN

To motivate the program team members for the implementation of Self Assessment Manual (SAM) by carrying out the meetings at departmental level. It may also include the visits of individual departments by QEC team if found necessary.

Follow up of changes suggested by QEC with departments who have sent their SARs is also underway.

Follow up for the submission of SARs has already done and will continue as well.

Follow up of the Teachers and Courses Evaluation survey forms is also underway.

Implementation plans submitted by different departments will also be followed up.

THANK YOU