qualifying as a vcoc after a fund’s initial investment
TRANSCRIPT
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Qualifying as a VCOCAfter a Fund’s Initial Investment
Preliminary Report on an
Evolving Technique
June 2003
2274205
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2
Introduction
Venture firms that accept capital from pension and retirement plans regulated under ERISA (“ERISA Investors”) typically have three choices:
• Qualify the “General Partner” of each applicable fund (“Fund”) as an ERISA fiduciary and comply with fiduciary standards
• Limit ERISA Investor participation in each Fund to a level that is not significant (the “Significant Participation Test”)
• Qualify each Fund as a venture capital operating company (“VCOC”)
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
3
Introduction
In general, a Fund can be a VCOC only if it qualifies no later than the date of its first portfolio investment
• Traditionally, this has meant that Funds which do not initially qualify as VCOCs must satisfy the Significant Participation Test
• This can be a big problem because a Fund may cease to satisfy the Significant Participation Test due to circumstances beyond the control of the General Partner
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
4
Introduction
Under limited circumstances, it may be possible to restructure a Fund so that it can qualify as a VCOC even after its initial portfolio investment (a “VCOC Restructuring”)
• This presentation is a preliminary report on the evolving VCOC Restructuring technique
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
5
Background: ERISA Fiduciaries
Most General Partners are not qualified ERISA fiduciaries
• Compliance costs are high
• Self-dealing and prohibited transaction rules can interfere with normal venture fund operations
• Many forms of carried interest are not permitted
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
6
Background: Significant Participation Test
Many funds satisfy the Significant Participation Test
• ERISA Investors and other types of retirement plans (together, “Benefit Plan Investors”) must hold less than 25% of the value of each class of Fund interests
• Test is applied after each acquisition of an interest
– “Acquisition” is defined so broadly that the test can be appliedalmost continuously
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
7
Background: Significant Participation Test
It can be difficult to satisfy the Significant Participation Test even if less than 25% of Fund capital is committed by Benefit Plan InvestorsExamples:
• Defaults by non-Benefit Plan Investors can increase the relative ownership of Benefit Plan Investors
– Non-Benefit Plan Investors (e.g., individuals and corporations) default more frequently than Benefit Plan Investors
• Non-Benefit Plan Investors may wish to transfer their interests to Benefit Plan Investors
– Benefit Plan Investors represent a large portion of secondary market purchasers
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
8
Background: Significant Participation Test
• “Side Letters” or similar arrangements that grant special rightsto one or more investors may split the Fund into multiple classes, each of which must consist of less than 25% Benefit Plan Investors
– Restructuring efforts might cause a Fund to be divided into multiple classes of interests
– Large investors may negotiate for special rights in exchange for supporting General Partner’s restructuring plan and/or continuation of the Fund
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
9
Background: VCOC Requirements
In general, a Fund will be a VCOC if:
• At least 50% of its portfolio investments (valued at cost)
• are in operating companies
• with respect to which the Fund holds “Management Rights”
These requirements must be satisfied:
• At the Fund’s first portfolio investment, and
• At least once during each “Annual Valuation Period”
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
10
Background: VCOC Requirements
Management Rights
• Consist of rights to “substantially participate in, or substantially influence the conduct of” the management of an operating company
• Must be direct contractual rights to the Fund
– Informal rights resulting from large stock ownership don’t qualify
– Contractual rights held by a “sister fund” co-investing in the same company don’t qualify
• Often obtained through a standard “Management Rights Agreement”
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
11
Background: VCOC Requirements
Traditionally, attorneys have advised that a Fund cannot become a VCOC if it failed to qualify:
• As of its first portfolio investment, or
• During any subsequent Annual Valuation Period
The VCOC Restructuring provides a limited exception to this general rule
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
12
VCOC Restructuring
Summary of Steps• Existing Fund (“EF”) creates subsidiary Fund (“SF”)
• SF makes an initial portfolio investment with respect to which it obtains Management Rights and thereby qualifies as a VCOC
• SF enters into separate Management Rights Agreements with portfolio companies of EF
• EF merges into SF, with SF as the surviving entity
• SF changes its name to EF
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
13
VCOC Restructuring
Existing Structure: Stage One
EF, L.P.
GP, L.L.C. Investors
Notes:
EF holds various portfolio company securities, but does not qualify as a VCOC
Portfolio Securities
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
14
VCOC Restructuring
Pre-Merger: Stage Two
EF, L.P.
GP, L.L.C. Investors
SF, L.P.
$Portfolio
Securities
Notes:
EF is the sole limited partner of SF and holds 100% of economic interest
GP manages SF, but holds no economic interest
EF contributes cash to SF in order to facilitate Stage Three
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
15
VCOC Restructuring
Pre-Merger: Stage Three
EF, L.P.
GP, L.L.C. Investors
SF, L.P.
Notes:
SF uses cash to make its initial portfolio investment in Op Co and simultaneously obtains Management Rights
As a result, SF qualifies as a VCOC
Op Co, Inc.
$
Management Rights
Portfolio Securities
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
16
VCOC Restructuring
Pre-Merger: Stage Four
EF, L.P.
GP, L.L.C. Investors
SF, L.P.
Notes:
SF obtains Management Rights from existing portfolio companies of EF
Op Co, Inc.
Management Rights
Portfolio Securities
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
17
VCOC Restructuring
Merger: Stage Five
EF, L.P.
GP, L.L.C. Investors
SF, L.P.
Notes:
EF merges into SF
SF is the surviving entity
Op Co, Inc.
Portfolio Securities
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
18
VCOC Restructuring
Post-Merger: Stage Six
SF, L.P.
GP, L.L.C. Investors
Notes:
GP and Investors hold exactly same rights in SF that they held in EF
SF has sufficient Management Rights in entire portfolio to continue to qualify as a VCOC
Portfolio Securities
(Including Op Co)
Management Rights
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
19
VCOC Restructuring
Post-Merger: Final Stage
EF, L.P.
GP, L.L.C. Investors
Notes:
SF has changed its name to EF
Restructuring is complete
Portfolio Securities
(Including Op Co)
Management Rights
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
20
Issues to Consider
The US Department of Labor has not issued specific guidance on this structure
• VCOC status of surviving entity would be based solely on opinion of counsel
Consider obtaining opinion of an ERISA boutique firm to supplement advice from primary Fund counsel
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
21
Issues to Consider
Because there is no substantive change in the rights and duties of the General Partner and Investors, the VCOC Restructuring should not be considered a new issuance of securities
• However, the law is not entirely clear
• WSGR discussions with SEC are ongoing
• Unless and until direct guidance obtained from SEC, consider re-validating all Investors as “accredited” and/or “qualified”
– Restructuring could be precluded if Investors cannot be re-validated or redeemed
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
22
Issues to Consider
Costs are not trivial
• Investor consents required
• Management Rights must be obtained
• Contracts and agreements must be reviewed to ensure that merger will not violate covenants and restrictions
– Approvals may be required from some contractual counterparties
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
23
Issues to Consider
Obtaining Management Rights can provide benefits beyond ERISA compliance
• May permit exemption from California investment adviser registration
• See WSGR presentation “California Regulation of Investment Advisers: Recent Changes Affecting Venture Capital Firms” (June 2002)
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
24
Conclusions
Relying upon the Significant Participation Test can be risky and interfere with Fund transfers, etc.
If you’ve relied on the Significant Participation Test, but may not be able to qualify in the future, consider VCOC Restructuring
When forming new Funds, qualify as a VCOC whenever practicable
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
25
For More Information
See WSGR memorandum “ERISA Rules Applicable to Venture Capital Funds”
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
26
This presentation is intended only as a general discussion and should not be regarded as legal
advice. For more information, please contact your Fund Services Group attorney.
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFund Services Group650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304Tel: 650-493-9300
www.wsgr.com