7/24/2019 Q&A Evidence.

1/2

1. The Parole Evidence Rule applies to:a. Subsequent agreement placed

on issueb. Written agreement or

contractual documentsc.

Judgment on a compromise

agreementd. Will and testaments

2. !ero" cop# o$ a document:a. %s admissibleb. &ould be admissiblec. 'ever admissibled. Has a probative value

(. TR)E *R FALSE: in general+ the Parole

Evidence Rule is designed to give

certaint# to all transactions+ preserve

the reliabilit# and protect the sanctit#

o$ the agreement.

,. %t re$ers to an# evidence to prove the

contents o$ a document other than the

original document itsel$. SECONDAR

E!"DENCE.

-. %t is an# evidence in aliunde+ hether

oral or ritten+ hich is intended or

tends to var# or contradict a complete

and en$orceable agreement embodied

in a document. #AROLE E!"DENCE.

/. $R%E *R 0SE: %n general3 the

Parole Evidence Rule applies onl# to

contractual documents.

4. $R%E*R 0SE: The Parole Evidence

Rule does not appl# here at least one

part# to the suit is not a part# 5 nor a

priv# to a part# 5 to the ritten

instrument and does not base his

claim+ nor assert his right arising $rom

the instrument or established therein.

6. $R%E *R 0SE: 7ue e"ecution o$ a

riting ma# be proved b# parole

evidence.

8. $R%E *R 0SE: %n order that the

parole evidence ma# be admissible+

the mista9e or imper$ection o$ the

document+ or its $ailure to e"press the

true intent and agreement o$ the

parties+ or the validit# o$ the

agreement3 must be put in issue b#

the pleadings. Where the plainti

$ailed to allege an# such $act in his

complaint+ he cannot introduce parole

evidence thereon.

1;. %t is the principle that public records

cannot be removed or brought out

$rom here the# are o proposals and is the =nal

and sole repositor#+ memorial and

evidence o$ hat as =nall# agreed

upon. #R"NC"#LE OF

"N$ERRO(A$"ON OF )%RAL AC$S

12. $R%E*R 0SE: The Parole Evidence

Rule does not appl# to collateral

agreements. P'? vs. Seeto+ 18-23

1(. %t means that the

instrument@document itsel$ is clear and

certain on its $ace but the ambiguit#

arises $rom some e"trinsic+ collateral

or outside $actor+ thus there is

uncertaint# as to ho the terms are to

be en$orced. LA$EN$*"N$R"NS"C.

1,. %n cases o$ secondar# evidence+ ho

has the burden o$ proo$A $HE

OFFEROR OF $HE SECONDAR

E!"DENCE HAS $HE '%RDEN OF

#ROOF.

1-. *ne o$ these statements are not

correct: The Parole Evidence Rule 5a. pplies onl# to ritten

agreement and illsb. pplies onl# to parties thereto

and their successors>in>interestc. 7oes not appl# to a part# to a

suit ho is not a signator# or

ho does not derive a right

$rom such signator# to the

ritten agreement or illd. Applies to all parties to a

suit regardless o+ ,-et-er

t-e are parties or not to or

derive t-eir rig-t under a

,ritten agreement or ,ill

involve in a suit.

1/. TR)E *R FALSE: The oeror+ upon

proo$ o$ its e"ecution@e"istence and

cause o$ its unavailabilit#+ ithout bad

$aith on his part+ ma# prove its

contents+ in no particular order.a. cop#B

7/24/2019 Q&A Evidence.

2/2

b. recital o$ its contents in some

authentic documentB

c. The testimon# o$ the itness.