pv modules modelling - sandia energy · 2018. 7. 26. · institute of the environmental sciences /...

22
Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst PV modules modelling André Mermoud Institute of the Environmental Sciences Group of energy - PVsyst [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    PV modules modelling

    André Mermoud Institute of the Environmental Sciences

    Group of energy - PVsyst [email protected]

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Objectives

    Establish a model for a general simulation program

    representing the I/V behaviour of PV modules of any technology

    in any Irradiance and Temperature conditions

    should be established with a minimum of parameters

    (manufacturer's parameters + few additional ones)

    We start from the "Standard" one-diode model

    We try to find corrections for representing measured data

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Methodology

    Establishing a model and assessment with outdoor measured data

    • Measurements of I/V characteristics every 10 minutes, – samples in any Irradiance and Temperature (G,T) conditions. – Pyranometer measurements of GlobPlane, GlobHor, DiffHor, – Cell reference measurements for stability assessment – Incidence irradiance on collector, corrected for incidence angle

    • Choose one I/V characteristics in this sample (around 1000 W/m2)

    – Establish the parameters of the "One-diode" model [Townsend-Beckman]

    – Comparison (Measured - Modelled) values for all measurements • Analysis of the distributions of Pmax, Voc, Isc (not Vmpp, Impp)

    • Graphical distributions according to diverse variables (G, T, time)

    • Using MBD and RMSD as quantitative indicators

    • Adjustments of secondary parameters for optimizing MBD and RMSD

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    The PV cell may be represented by the following schema:

    Standard "One diode model"

    I

    IphRsh

    Rs

    RLV

    Photocourant Diode Utilisateur

    I = Iph - Io [ exp (q · (V+I·Rs) / ( Ncs·g·k·Tc) ) - 1 ] - (V + I·Rs) / Rsh

    Photocurrent Current in the diode Current in Rsh

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Standard model I/V characteristics

    I = Iph - Io [ exp (q · (V+I·Rs) / ( Ncs·g·k·Tc) ) - 1 ] - (V + I·Rs) / Rsh

    Module I/V Characteristics

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    Voltage [V]

    Cu

    rren

    t [A

    ]

    1000 W/m², 25°C

    Isc, (Vmp,Imp), Vco

    R shunt

    R serie

    R shunt

    R serie

    Photocourant

    FF = (Vmp*Imp) / (Vco*Isc)

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Variables

    • I = Module current [A]. • V = Module voltage [V].

    5 Parameters to be determined

    • Iph = Photocurrent [A], proportionnal to the irradiance F, • Io = Diode saturation current, dep. on temperature • Rs = Series Resistance [W]. • Rsh = Shunt Résistance [W]. • g = Diode quality factor, normally between 1 and 2.

    Constants • q = Electron charge = 1.602 · 10-19 Coulomb • k = Bolzmann constant = 1.381 · 10-23 J/K. • Ncs = Number of cells in series. • Tc = Effective cell temperature [Kelvin] • q/kT = 26 mV at 300 K

    Parameters of the model

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    For determining the 5 parameters (Iph, Io, Rsh, Rs, g) The measurement of one I/V characteristics at (Gref, TRef) is sufficient !

    Parameter determination

    Shell ST40

    0.00

    0.50

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    2.50

    3.00

    0 5 10 15 20 25Voltage [V]

    Cu

    rren

    t [A

    ]

    Measured caracteristics)

    Model, RS = 0

    Model, RS optimal

    Model, RS = RSMax

    Pmax, Isc and Vco

    Rsh is determined by the inverse of the slope around Isc = 0

    The equation written at the 3 usual points at STC (or any other (Gref, Tref) conditions) :

    (0, ISC) (Vmp, Imp) (Vco,0)

    gives 3 equations, leaving one free parameter. We choose to fix Rserie.

    => For a given value of Rs, it is possible to establish Iph, Io and g, i.e. the full I/V model

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Using the measured reference I/V : => Détermination of Rs: The value is easily obtained by

    minimizing the I (meas. - model) errors.

    NB: The errors s (Imodel – Imes) are usually lower than 0.4 % of Isc !

    Rseries determination

    Sigma Error (Model - Measurements) on Current

    0.0

    10.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    70.0

    0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80

    Serie resistance [ohm]

    Sig

    ma

    [m

    A]

    With manufacturer's data Isc, Vco, Imp, Vmp at STC :

    - Rshunt estimated using (Isc - Imp) / Vmp slope

    - Rserie defined using fixed g = 1.3 or 1.35 (corresponds to around half the RsMax)

    Could be determined by specified apparent Rserie, not reliable.

    Beckman: proposes using specified mVco, not reliable.

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    The model has been established for reference conditions (Gref, Tref)

    The photocurrent is proportionnal to the irradiance

    with slight temperature correction (mIsc in specifications)

    The diode saturation current Io varies strongly with the temperature

    (where eG = junction gap energy)

    Conditions at different (G, T)

    Iph = ( G / Gref ) · [ Iph ref + mISC · (TC - TC ref) ]

    Io = Io ref ( TC / TC ref )3 · exp [ ( q · eG / g · k) · ( 1/TC ref - 1/TC ) ]

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    To be applied to incident irradiance, for all technologies.

    Reflexions according to the Fresnel's laws.

    Incidence correction (IAM)

    Facteur de correction d'incidence (IAM)

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 15 30 45 60 75 90

    Incidence angle [°]

    F IAM = 1 - bo * ( 1/cos(i) - 1 )

    ( with bo = 0.05 )

    Usual parametrisation proposed by "ASHRAE":

    FIAM = 1 - bo · (1/cos i - 1)

    with i = incidence angle

    bo = 0.05 for glass

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Model established on one measured characteristics (Vmp, Imp, Vco, Isc) => parameters IphRef, Io, g, Rshunt, Rserie

    The model is applied on each I/V measured characteristics

    The model quality is estimated by indicators on (Pmax, Voc, Isc) m = MBD = S (Val. meas – Val. model) / Nmeas s = RMSD = SQRT [ S (Val. meas – Val. model)2 / Nmeas ]

    Validation of the model

    + Exponential correction on Rsh (acc. to measurements) RshExp = 5.5 fixed for ~ all modules => Additional parameter Rsh(0)

    R shunt function of Irradiance

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

    Irradiance [W/m²]

    R S

    hu

    nt

    me

    as

    ure

    d [

    oh

    m]

    Measurements

    Parametrization

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    "Pure" standard model

    on Pmax : m = 1.8% s = 1.1%

    on Vco: m = 1.0% s = 0.9%

    Results on a crystalline module

    Pmax Error, Meas - Model vs GlobP

    -6.0

    -4.0

    -2.0

    0.0

    2.0

    4.0

    6.0

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

    GlobP [W/m2]

    Pm

    ax E

    rro

    r (M

    eas-M

    od

    ) [W

    ]

    0 < Tmod < 80°C Model

    Pmax Error, Meas - Model vs GlobP

    -6.0

    -4.0

    -2.0

    0.0

    2.0

    4.0

    6.0

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

    GlobP [W/m2]

    Pm

    ax E

    rro

    r (M

    eas-M

    od

    ) [W

    ]

    0 < Tmod < 80°C Model

    With Rshunt exp. correction

    on Pmax : m = 0.2% s = 1.2%

    on Vco: m = 0.4% s = 0.5%

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Results on a CIS module (Shell ST40)

    With Rshunt correction

    Errors on 6 years of measurements

    on Pmax : m = 0.2% s = 1.0%

    on Vco: m = 0.0% s = 0.9%

    on Isc: m = 0.5% s = 0.8%

    Pmax Model vs Pmax measured

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Pmax measured [W]

    Pm

    ax

    m

    od

    el [

    W]

    0 < Tmod < 80°C Model

    Shell ST40 - CIS Seasonal effect

    -5.0%

    -4.0%

    -3.0%

    -2.0%

    -1.0%

    0.0%

    1.0%

    2.0%

    3.0%

    4.0%

    5.0%

    sept

    04

    déc 0

    4

    mars

    05

    juin

    05

    sept

    05

    déc 0

    5

    mars

    06

    juin

    06

    sept

    06

    déc 0

    6

    mars

    07

    juin

    07

    sept

    07

    déc 0

    7

    mars

    08

    juin

    08

    sept

    08

    déc 0

    8

    mars

    09

    juin

    09

    sept

    09

    déc 0

    9

    mars

    10

    juin

    10

    Pm

    pp

    (M

    eas -

    Mo

    del)

    err

    or

    This CIS module obeys quasi-perfectly the one-diode model !

    Long-term results very stable.

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Low-light performances

    These validations against outdoor data indicate that low-light performances

    are well described (outdoor) by the "one diode" model.

    In the model, the low-light behaviour is related to:

    The Series resistance : losses behave as R * I²

    low light efficiency better with "bad" (high) Rserie

    The shunt resistance: exponential behaviour

    low light efficiency better with "bad" (low) Rshunt (with good Rshunt, nothing to gain when decreasing the irradiance)

    The low-light efficiency of the model is very often in contradiction

    with the data produced by the manufacturers. o How are they measured ? Indoor or outdoor ?

    o Indoor: effect of the filters ? Spectral neutrality ?

    o Outdoor: How are they renormalized to fixed T = 25°C ?

    o Outdoor measurements with which irradiance sensors ?

    This discrepancy has high implications, and should be understood.

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Temperature behaviour

    The temperature coefficient mPmax is a result of the model

    We can adjust it to manufacturer’s specifications

    using a linear correction on the diode ideality factor :

    g = gref * mg (Tc – Tcref)

    Usually mg is very small (< 0.2 %/°C)

    mVco is also a result of the model

    Depends on Rserie and also corrected by mg

    But cannot be adjusted simultaneously with mPmax

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    3 corrections to the standard model:

    • Rshunt correction – more important weight, main contribution

    • Recombination loss in the –i– layer

    • Spectral correction

    Amorphous modules

    SHR-17 (old) - I/V Characteristics

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0Voltage [V]

    Cu

    rre

    nt

    [A]

    Measurements

    Model

    Max. powerGinc = 881 W/m²

    Ginc = 680 W/m²

    Ginc = 501 W/m²

    Ginc = 329 W/m²

    Ginc = 209 W/m²

    For a given I/V characteristics, it is always possible to find model parameters with good match:

    errors s(I) < 0.4% of Isc

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Amorphous: Rshunt behaviour

    SHR-17: R shunt function of Irradiance

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    0 200 400 600 800 1000

    Irradiance [W/m²]

    R S

    hu

    nt

    measu

    red

    [o

    hm

    ]

    Measurements

    Parametrization

    Shunt resistance at STC is far lower than for crystalline (higher slope)

    But very high dynamics: Rsh(0) / Rsh(STC) 12

    Rsh(0)

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Add a term to the I/V equation [Mertens et al]

    Recombination correction

    VRsh RL

    Utilisateur

    Iph

    I

    Rs

    Diode

    Photo-

    courant

    Irec (Iph, V)

    Recom-

    binaison

    Voc Model vs Voc measured

    9.0

    10.0

    11.0

    12.0

    13.0

    14.0

    9 10 11 12 13 14

    Voc measured [V]

    Vo

    c M

    od

    el [V

    ]

    Voc Model vs Voc measured

    9.0

    10.0

    11.0

    12.0

    13.0

    14.0

    9 10 11 12 13 14

    Voc measured [V]

    Vo

    c M

    od

    el [V

    ]

    Parameter

    d²mt

    Effect on Voc

    without corr.

    after corr.

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Correction proposed by CREST [Univ. of Loughborough, UK]

    • Caracterisation of the energetic contents (APE – Average Photon Energy) according to air mass and clearness index

    • UF = Utilisation factor: convolution with the spectral sensitivity of each technology (proposed for amorphous only)

    Spectral correction

    00.2

    0.40.6

    0.81 6

    54

    32

    1

    0.46

    0.49

    0.52

    0.55

    0.58

    0.61

    0.64

    0.67

    0.70

    UF

    a-S

    i

    KTc Air Mass

    Utilization Factor a-Si:H0.670-0.700

    0.640-0.670

    0.610-0.640

    0.580-0.610

    0.550-0.580

    0.520-0.550

    0.490-0.520

    0.460-0.490

    This correction is based on :

    • the Loughborough climate • computed for single amorphous only

    Concerns photocurrent

    Improves s by some few %

    May probably be improved for other technologies.

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Over one year (2009-2010)

    on Pmax : m = 0.1% s = 2.3%

    on Vco: m = 0.7% s = 1.0%

    on Isc: m =-0.1% s = 2.7%

    Results for SHR-17 (tripple Junction)

    Pmax Error, Meas - Model vs GlobP

    -4.0

    -3.0

    -2.0

    -1.0

    0.0

    1.0

    2.0

    3.0

    4.0

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

    GlobP [W/m2]

    Pm

    ax E

    rro

    r (M

    eas-M

    od

    ) [W

    ]

    0 < Tmod < 80°C Model

    Over six years:

    s (month) ~ 1.2 %

    The model should take seasonal annealing effect into account

    (but how ? which parameters ? )

    Unisolar SHR-17 Wp Seasonal effect

    -10%

    -8%

    -6%

    -4%

    -2%

    0%

    2%

    4%

    6%

    8%

    10%

    sept

    04

    déc 0

    4

    mars

    05

    juin

    05

    sept

    05

    déc 0

    5

    mars

    06

    juin

    06

    sept

    06

    déc 0

    6

    mars

    07

    juin

    07

    sept

    07

    déc 0

    7

    mars

    08

    juin

    08

    sept

    08

    déc 0

    8

    mars

    09

    juin

    09

    sept

    09

    déc 0

    9

    mars

    10

    juin

    10

    6 y

    ears

    Pm

    ax (

    Meas -

    Mo

    del)

    dif

    fere

    nce

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Modules of all technologies

    Error on Voc

    -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6%

    Error on Pmax

    -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6%

    Si-mono: Siemens M55, 1 year

    Si-mono: Atlantis M55, 2.6 years

    Si-poly: Kyocera, 5 years

    CIS: Shell ST40, 6 years

    CdTe: First Solar FS267, 1.5 year

    Si-a:H single: Flexcell, 1 year

    Si-a:H tandem: EPV-40, 2.5 years

    a-Si:H tripple: Unisolar SHR17, 1 year

    idem, 6 years

    a-Si:H tripple: Unisolar US32, 2.3 years

    Microcryst: Sharp NAF121-G5, 7 months

    Error on Isc

    -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6%

    Results of thin film modules (except CIS) affected by seasonal annealing effects which penalize the error on Pmax

  • Institute of the Environmental Sciences / Group of Energy / PVsyst

    Conclusions

    • "Standard" one-diode model works well with Crystalline and CIS modules

    • One full I/V characteristics : completely defined • With manufacturer's data: hypothesis on 2 parameters Rshunt and Rserie

    • Exponential Rshunt correction required by all technologies additional parameter Rsh(0)

    • Amorphous, m-crystalline and CdTe require recombination correction additional parameter d²mt

    • Spectral correction for Amorphous and m-crystalline, not for CdTe

    • Outdoor measurements reproduced with 1.0 to 1.6% RMSD for all technol. excluding annealing effects, not taken into account

    • Low-light irradiance: discrepancies with indoor and manufacturer's measurements have still to be understood.

    • Results on one measured module - not manufacturer's specifications

    Dot not confuse "Model accuracy" and "Parameter accuracy" !!!