putting it all together - particle detectors writeup for 3 rd section:

117
Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section: http://yeti. phy . bris .ac. uk /Level3/phys30800/ CourseMaterials /Part_3. pdf

Upload: seth-rodriguez

Post on 28-Mar-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Putting it all together- Particle Detectors

Writeup for 3rd section:http://yeti.phy.bris.ac.uk/Level3/phys30800/CourseMaterials/Part_3.pdf

Page 2: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Measurements

• Non-Destructive• Particle only

minimally perturbed

• Generally involves electrically charged particles depositing energy through many soft scatters

• Aim for low mass detector

• Destructive• Initial particle absorbed

or significantly scattered

• Detection generally by energy deposited by charged particles produced

• Can detect neutral particles

Page 3: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Types of Measurement• Position

– (tracking)

• Timing– Time of flight– Event separation

• Velocity– Cerenkov/Transition radiation

• Energy– Total energy– dE/dx

Page 4: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Position measurement

• All detectors give some indication of particle position – ( even if it is only that the particle passed

through the detector )

• Most detectors have better resolution in one (or two) directions than the other two (or three).– Hodoscope ~ cm (2D)– Silicon strip detector ~5m (1D)– Silicon pixel detector ~5m (2D)– Photographic emulsion ~1m (3D)

Page 5: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Position Measurement - Tracking

• Measuring two (or more) points along the path of a particle allows its direction as well as is position to be measured.

• Measuring a number of points along the path of a particle allows any curvature to be measured.

Radius of curvature in a magnetic field gives the momentum

Page 6: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Position Measurement – Tracking• Pattern recognition can be tricky….

Page 7: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Timing Measurement

• The time at which a particle passed through a detector can be measured to better than 1ns (10-9s)– Scintillator tends to be good ( 100ps )

• Can measure velocity of particle – “time-of-flight” (ToF ) from interaction to detector.

– Measuring and p or E gives particle mass ( E=m, p=m) and hence (usually) identity

– ToF only useful for fairly low energy particles ( “slightly relativistic” ) since highly relativistic particles all have within the bounds of error.

Page 8: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Timing Measurement

• Distinguish particles from different “events”– The interval between interactions

generating the particles being measured is is often short. Need good timing resolution to separate tracks from different events.

• Measure start time for drift chambers.– … and other devices that rely on

measuring signal propagation times.

Page 9: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Timing Measurement – Particle ID

Page 10: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Timing Measurement – Particle ID

Page 11: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Timing Measurement – Particle ID

• Hermes experiment uses TOF as one means of particle identification.

• Bunches of electrons hit fixed target.

• Measure time between collision and particles reaching scintillation detectors.

• m2 = (1/2 – 1) p2

Page 12: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Dead Time• Most detectors take a finite time to produce a

signal and recover before they can detect another. This is the dead-time– Dead time varies with detector e.g. Si-strip

detector ~ ns , Geiger-Muller tube ~ ms

• If the dead-time is Td and particles arrive at a mean rate of r per unit-time then probability that the detector is “dead” is ~ rTd

– I.e. efficiency is = (1 – rTd )

Page 13: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Timing Coincidence• Where a detector has a high background it is

common to use two or more detectors in coincidence – Output from combined detector only if all parts

detect a particle. ( or 3 of 4, ….. etc.)

• If two detectors have a background rate of B1, B2 and a signal is produced if both detectors “fire” within the coincidence time, t then the background rate from the combined detector is B = B1 B2 t

Page 14: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Energy Measurement

• Rate of energy loss – dE/dx

• Total energy - Calorimetry

Page 15: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Energy Measurement – dE/dx

• Measure the rate of energy loss of a charged particle through detector by ionization - dE/dx– dE/dx Depends on

– ( particles with same but different masses give ~ same dE/dx )

– Measuring and one of E,p, gives particle mass.

Page 16: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

dE/dx Data

• Data from gaseous track detector.– Each point from a

single particle– Several energy loss

samples for each point

– “Averaged” to get energy loss

– Fluctuations easily seen

dE/dx (keV/cm)

p (GeV/c)

p

K

e

Page 17: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Energy Measurement – Calorimetry

• Measure total energy of a particle by stopping the particle in a medium and arranging for the energy to produce a detectable signal. This process is called calorimetry– Detector needs to be thick enough to stop

the particle

– Can measure energy of neutral particles using calorimetry

Page 18: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Energy Measurement – Regions of Applicability

Particle Energy

Momentum by tracking (charged particles)

Calorimetry

keV - MeV Track length too short to measure curvature

Absorb energy of initial particle

100’s MeV Good measurement of curvature

Fractional error large due to fluctuation in Particle showers

100’s GeV Track too straight even with high B field and long path

Fractional error small

Page 19: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Measuring Velocity • Use a process such as Cerenkov radiation

or transition radiation where the threshold/intensity of the radiation depends on the velocity of the particle– Cerenkov radiation: angle and intensity are

functions of – Transition radiation: intensity is a function

of useful for highly relativistic particles)

• dE/dx by ionization ( already mentioned)

Page 20: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Sources of measurement error

• Fluctuations of underlying physical processes

– “Statistical” fluctuations of numbers of quanta or interactions

– Variation in the gain process

• Noise from electronics etc.

Page 21: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Fluctuation in dE/dx by Ionization

Page 22: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Fluctuation in dE/dx by Ionization

• Up to now we have discussed the mean energy lost by a charged particle due to ionization.

• The actual energy lost by a particular particle will not in general be the same as the mean.– dE/dx due to a large number of random

interactions

– Distribution is not Gaussian.

Page 23: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Fluctuation in dE/dx by Ionization

• Distribution of dE/dx usually called the “Landau Distribution”

Gaussianpeak

high energy tail

mostprobable

loss

meanenergyloss

energy loss

Landaudistributionof energyloss

Page 24: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Fluctuation in dE/dx – Gaussian Peak

Gaussianpeak

high energy tail

mostprobable

loss

meanenergyloss

energy loss

Landaudistributionof energyloss

• Most interactions involve little energy exchange and there are many of them.

• The total energy loss from these interactions is a Gaussian (central limit theorem)

Page 25: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Fluctuation in dE/dx – Gaussian Peak

• For a Gaussian distribution resulting from N random events the ratio of the width/mean 1/N

• Increasing the thickness of the detector decreases the relative width of the Gaussian peak:

– (from Bethe)

xA

Zx

A

ZcmrN eeA 1569.04 2 222

Page 26: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Fluctuation in dE/dx – High Energy Tail

• The probability of a interaction that involves a significant fraction of the particles energy is low. However such interactions produce a large signal in the medium.

Gaussianpeak

high energy tail

mostprobable

loss

meanenergyloss

energy loss

Landaudistributionof energyloss

Page 27: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Fluctuation in dE/dx – High Energy Tail

• Energy loss is in the form of “-rays” –scattered electrons with appreciable energy.

• Energy deposited in a thin detector can be different from the energy lost by the particle – the -electron can have enough energy to leave the detector.

• Depending on the thickness of the detector there may not be any -electrons produced.

Page 28: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

dE/dx – High Energy Tail• Because of the high energy tail increasing the

thickness of the detector does not improve the dE/dx resolution much.– Relative width of Gaussian peak reduces, so

would expect to get better estimate of mean dE/dx, but….

– Probability of high energy interaction rises, so tail gets bigger.

• Usual method of measuring dE/dx is to take several samples and fit distribution (or just discard values far from Gaussian peak)

Page 29: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Multiple Scattering

• Deflection of a charged particle by large numbers of small angle scatters.

Page 30: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Multiple Scattering• Looking at dE/dx from ionization, ignore

nuclei.– Energy transfer small compared to scattering

from (lighter) electrons.

• However, scattering from nuclei does change the direction of the particles momentum, if not its magnitude.– Deflection of particle’s path limits the accuracy

with which the curvature in a magnetic field can be determined, and hence the momentum measured.

Page 31: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

“Single Scattering”

• Deflections are in random directions – “Drunkards Walk”

• Total deflection from N collisions • The angular deflection caused by a single

collision is well modelled by the Rutherford Scattering formula:dddd

Most probable scatter is at small angle

Page 32: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Multiple Scattering

• RMS angular deflection, projected onto some plane:

– RMS deflection x

– Length scale is the radiation length X0

010

020 log

9

11

MeV6.13

X

x

X

x

m

Page 33: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Multiple Scattering – Probability Distribution

• Small scattering angles - many small scatters. Gaussian

• Large scattering angles from single large scatters. Probability 3

Page 34: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Quantum Fluctuations

• A signal consists of a finite number of quanta (electrons, photons,….)

• If at some stage in detection chain the number of quanta drops to N then the relative fluctuation in the signal will be:

• NB. Any subsequent amplification of the signal will not reduce this relative fluctuation

NN

N 1

Page 35: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Quantum Fluctuations – Poisson Distribution

• If the number of quanta is small then the probability of producing m quanta when the average is n is:

• Probability of producing no signal:

Efficiency of detector reduced by (1- e-n)

nem

nmP

m

!)(

neP )0(

Page 36: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Quantum Fluctuations –Fano Factor

• If the energy deposited by a particle is distributed between many different modes, only a small fraction of which give a detectable signal then the Poisson distribution is applicable.– E.g. scintillation detector: small fraction of

deposited energy goes into photons. Only few photons reach light detector.

Page 37: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Quantum Fluctuations: Fano Factor• If most of deposited energy goes into the

signal then Poisson statistics are not applicable.– E.g. Silicon detector – energy can either cause

an electron-hole pair (signal detection and most likely process) or phonons.

• In this case the fractional standard deviation:

– F is the “Fano factor” (F ~ 0.12 for Si detector)

N

F

N

N

Page 38: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Electronic Noise• Most modern detectors produce and

electrical signal, which is then recorded.• Electronic circuits produce noise – with

careful design this can be minimized.• Consider different sources of intrinsic

noise:– Johnson noise

– Shot noise

– Excess noise.

Page 39: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Johnson Noise• Appears across and resistor due to random

thermal motion of charge carriers.

– k : Boltzmanns constant

– T : Temperature above absolute zero

– B : Bandwidth ( range of frequency considered)

• White noise spectrum (same noise power per root Hz at all frequencies)

kTRBVn 4(rms)

Page 40: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Shot Noise

• Fluctuation in the density of charge carriers ( “rain on a tin roof” )

• White noise spectrum

eIBI n 2(rms)

Page 41: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Excess Noise

• Anything other than Johnson and shot noise.

• Depends on details of electronic devices (e.g. transistors)

• Often has a 1/f spectrum ( same power per decade of frequency )

Page 42: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

“Typical” Detector Front-End

Equivalent Circuit:

Page 43: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Noise: Dependence on Amplifier Capacitance.

• The input resistance and capacitance of a detector “front end” form a low-pass filter which filters the Johnson noise from the input resistance:

C R

d e t e c t o r

Page 44: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Noise: Dependence on Amplifier Capacitance.

• “Filtered” noise:

• Noise spectrum :

• Integrate over all frequencies to get total noise energy:

RCj

VV n

1

)()(eff

kTRVn 42

1 2

0 222

22

1 C

kT

CR

dVV n

Page 45: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Noise: Dependence on Amplifier Capacitance.

• Amplifier noise often expressed in terms of the number of electrons, N, that would generate the same output.

• Q = CV = e N• Hence:

• Johnson noise increases with the input capacitance of the pre-amplifier.

e

kTCN

Page 46: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Overall Statistical Error• Depends on detector and the quantity

measured, but…• For quantity like dE/dx which is estimated

from the signal size:• S = A E

– S=measured signal

– E=primary signal , A=amplification

5

11 2

4

2

321

22

SAnn

nn

nn

F

EsnA

HS

HS

HS

Es

Page 47: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

.

Overall Statistical Error

• First term is fluctuation in production of interaction process ( e.g. Landau distribution of –dE/dx)

5

11 2

4

2

321

22

SAnn

nn

nn

F

EsnA

HS

HS

HS

Es

Page 48: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

.

Overall Statistical Error• Signal is made up of a number of quanta

( electrons, photons, ions, … ). • Second terms comes from the fluctuation in

the number of quanta, ns , ( F is the Fano factor)

5

11 2

4

2

321

22

SAnn

nn

nn

F

EsnA

HS

HS

HS

Es

Page 49: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

.

Overall Statistical Error• In general, not all the quanta in the signal are

collected – there is a “statistical bottle-neck” where the number of quanta, nh , is a minimum.

• The contribution to the error due from this bottleneck is approximated by the third term:

5

11 2

4

2

321

22

SAnn

nn

nn

F

EsnA

HS

HS

HS

Es

Page 50: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

.

Overall Statistical Error• Many detectors have an amplification stage

(e.g. drift chambers have gain due to avalanche near the anode wire)

• The gain process will have some fluctuation, represented by the fourth term– Each quanta produces on average A quanta after

amplification.

5

11 2

4

2

321

22

SAnn

nn

nn

F

EsnA

HS

HS

HS

Es

Page 51: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

.

Overall Statistical Error• There is a contribution to the uncertainty in

the signal from the noise in the readout electronics. The noise tends to have the same amplitude regardless of the size of the signal, so contributes to s/S like /S

• Described by the fifth term.

5

2

4

2

321

2211

SAnn

nn

nn

F

EsA

HS

HS

HS

Es

Page 52: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Energy Measurement Fluctuations

• As already remarked:– Precision of

momentum measurement (tracking) deteriorates at large momentum

– Energy measurement precision (calorimeter) generally improves as energy increases.

Response of PbWO4 calo to 120GeV e-

Page 53: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Energy Measurement fluctuations• Statistical fluctuations

(n.quanta)1/2

• Contributions from noise ~ constant

• “systematics” signal

• (Fluctuations much smaller for EM than hadronic showers)

cE

b

E

a

E

2

1

Page 54: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

The “general purpose” detector

Tracking Calorimeters Muon tracking

B

Page 55: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

The “General Purpose” Detector

Tracking Calorimeters Muon tracking

B

• Often a detector has to cope with many different types of particle of many different energies.

Construct a system of detectors allowing measurement of different aspects of different particles.

Page 56: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

The “General Purpose” Detector

Tracking Calorimeters Muon tracking

B

• Typically a general purpose detector will have three main parts:

1) Tracking (charged particles, magnetic field)

2) Calorimeter (electrons, photons, hadrons)

3) Muon tracking (generally only muons get this far)

Page 57: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

General Purpose Detector: Photons

Tracking Calorimeters Muon tracking

B

• Tracking - will generally cross the tracking detector without leaving a signal.

– Desirable – don’t want to scatter the photon or convert to charged particles. minimize material.

– But, some will pair convert.

• Calorimeter -will produce an EM shower.

– Length scale X0.

– Contained in EM portion of calo.

• Muon tracking – won’t reach

Page 58: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

General Purpose Detector: Electrons

Tracking Calorimeters Muon tracking

B

• Tracking – will leave a trail of ionization.

– Measure curvature to measure momentum.

– Some will undergo Bremsstrahlung.

• Calorimeter -will produce an EM shower.

– Same as for photons.

• Muon tracking – won’t reach

Page 59: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

General Purpose Detector: Hadrons

Tracking Calorimeters Muon tracking

B

• Tracking – charged hadrons will leave a trail of ionization.

• Calorimeter -will produce an hadronic shower.

– Length scale 0

– Energy in both EM and hadronic parts of calo.

• Muon tracking – won’t reach

Page 60: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

General Purpose Detector: Muons

Tracking Calorimeters Muon tracking

B

• Tracking –will leave a trail of ionization.

– Bremsstrahlung not a problem.

• Calorimeter – X0 for muons so long that no shower takes place.

– Still deposits energy by ionization.

• Muon tracking – crosses, leaving track of ionization

Page 61: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

General Purpose Detector: Tau, B-mesons, D-mesons

• Tracking – Decay close to interaction point. If daughters are charged may be able to reconstruct decay vertex.

• Calorimeter, Muon tracking- primary particle never reaches, but daughters may.

Page 62: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

CMS (Compact Muon Solenoid)

Page 63: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

CMS Cryostat Vacuum Tank

Page 64: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

CMS – Transverse Slice

Page 65: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

CMS “Event Display”

Page 66: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Zeus (800GeV p, 30GeV e+)

Page 67: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Zeus (800GeV p, 30GeV e+)

Page 68: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

ZEUS “ Compensating Calorimeter”

• Response to hadrons and electrons of equal energy is not the same ( for hadrons energy lost in nuclear binding energy and nuclear fragments

Page 69: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Compensating Calorimeter

• Can produce e/h ~ 1 by making absorber out of Uranium – hadronic shower induces fission, and emission of gamma-rays which deposit energy “compensating” for loss in binding energy etc. ( ZEUS calo)

• Can also compensate by having fine-grained calorimeter, and trying to separate out EM and hadronic parts of shower ( e.g. H1 liquid argon calo )

Page 70: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Compensating Calo

Page 71: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Scintillation detectors

S c i n t i l l a t o r

P a r t i c l e

Total Internal Reflection

L i g h t g u i d e

Light Detector

• Produce visible light• Transport to a light detector

– Total internal reflection

– Wavelength shifting fibres.

• Convert to an electrical signal

Page 72: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Total Internal Reflection• A ray of light is incident

on a boundary between two refractive indices is deflected.

• If the angle of incidence, i , is greater than the “critical angle” , c , the light is totally internally reflected.

• Sin(c) = n2/n1

Page 73: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Total Internal Reflection – Fraction of Light Trapped

• Estimate the fraction of light trapped by TIR by integrating over the solid angle

• E.g. light trapped in a scintillating fibre:

Page 74: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

TIR – Fraction of Light Trapped• Fraction trapped , f =

(solid-angle, i>c)/(total solid-angle)

• Put - i

• ddd(CosSindd

ddSindfc

0

%4~12

1

1

2

n

nf

Page 75: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Light Detectors

• Typically only get a few photons at light detector due to passage of particle

Need a detector sensitive at the single-photon level.

1) Photomultiplier tube

2) Avalanche photo-diode

3) Hybrid photodiode

Page 76: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Photomultiplier Tube

PhotocathodeDynodes Anode

electricalpulse

• Light falls on a photocathode in an evacuated tube and electrons emitted (photoelectric effect)– Quantum Efficiency depends on cathode material

and wavelength ( QE ~ 25% )

• Photoelectrons focused and accelerated towards the first dynode by electric field.

Page 77: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Photomultiplier Tube

PhotocathodeDynodes Anode

electricalpulse

• When photoelectron strikes dynode several electrons emitted (on average) n ~ 5

• Several dynodes ( ~ 10 ) give high gain ( 107) • PMT sensitive to magnetic field – need

screening in many applications

Page 78: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Photodiode• If a photon falls

on a semiconductor an electron/hole pair can be created if the photon energy is greater than the band-gap photodiode.

n p

n p boundary

electrons holes

Page 79: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Avalanche Photodiode

• Light output from scintillator normally too low to allow the use of photodiodes – No gain output signal lost in noise of readout.

• Increase bias to a point where electrons/holes collide with lattice with sufficient energy to generate new electron/hole pairs avalanche photodiode (APD)

Page 80: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Avalanche Photodiode

• Gain ~ 100 in linear mode ( can be operated in “Geiger Muller” mode)

• Compact• Low sensitivity to

magnetic field

Page 81: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Hybrid Photodiode• Like

photomultiplier tube, has a photocathode in an evacuated envelope

• Photoelectrons accelerated towards a reverse-biased solid-state diode ( e.g Si)

Page 82: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Hybrid Photodiode• When accelerated photoelectron hits diode ( ~

kV ) it liberates several electron-hole pairs.– Energy for one electron-hole pair in Si ~ 3.6eV– Gain ~ 1000

• Can also use avalanche photodiode to get extra gain

• Less sensitive to magnetic field than PMT• Can have bigger light sensitive area than APD• Can divide diode in to “pixels” to get position

of photons

Page 83: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Hybrid Photodiode

• Used in e.g. readout of CMS HCAL

• Wavelength shifting fibres used to couple light from scintillating sheets.

Page 84: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Scintillating Materials

Page 85: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Scintillating Materials

• Emit light when excited by passage of charged particle

• To be useful should be transparent to the light they produce.

• Two types ( more or less ):

1) Organic (work at molecular level)

2) Inorganic (work at crystal level)

Page 86: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Organic Scintillators• Scintillation is a property of the

individual organic molecules:

– Cartoon of molecular energy levels

Page 87: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Organic Scintillators-Light Emission• Passage of charged particle excites molecule.• Can decay radiatively with photon energy ,

Eemission = EB1 – EB0

• B0 rapidly decays to A0 by exchanging vibrational quanta with surroundings

Page 88: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Organic Scintillators-Light Absoption• Scintillator will absorb light – molecule state A0A1 ( atomic spacing

doesn’t have time to change )• Photon energy Eabsorption = EA1 – EA0 • Eabsorption> Eemission • Emission and absorption spectra not the same. Scintillator transparent to the light it produces (but usually put in a

wavelength-shifter to move out of UV)

Bicron BCF-91APlastic wavelength shifter

Page 89: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Organic Scintillator• Plastic common. E.g. polystyrene doped with

fluorescent molecules which shift the emission from UV to visible.

• Can be in solid or liquid form.• Atomic number, Z, low. Density low.

– Good or bad, depending on application• Fraction of energy converted to light is lower

than for inorganic scintillators~ 10 photons per keV deposited ( ~ 1% of energy

deposited, or about 10,000 photons/cm for MIP)

Page 90: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Inorganic Scintillators• Depend on properties of

crystal.

• Interaction of atoms in lattice broaden energy levels of individual atoms into bands.

• In an insulator, valence band is full , conduction band is empty.

– Electrons “locked into position”, (no available energy states)

– If promoted to conduction band, electrons are free to move

Valence

Conduction

Impurity levels

Page 91: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Inorganic Scintillators• If promoted to conduction band electrons will

move through lattice until trapped by an impurity/defect in the lattice or a deliberately introduced dopant

Page 92: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Inorganic Scintillators• For some traps, the electron

decays by emitting a photon (scintillaton)– Electron decays from some

traps without emitting light (quenching)

• Efficiency ( ~ 10% ) higher than for organic scintillators.

• Often high Z (low X0) – good for x-ray detection

• More expensive than organic.

e.g.: X0/cm

NaI(Tl) 3.67 2.59

Bi4Ge3O12 (“BGO”) 7.13 1.12

CeF3 6.16 1.68

PbWO4 8.28 0.89

Page 93: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Position Detectors

• Silicon diodes.

• Gas ionization chambers.

Page 94: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Semiconductor Detectors• High ionisation density in solids – particularly

semiconductors due to small band gap– Small excitation energy large thermal

background

• p-n junction gives depletion region with few free charge carriers

++ +

+-

-

--

Page 95: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Semiconductor detectors

• Diffusion of holes from p-type into n-type

• Diffusion of electrons from n-type into p-type

• Results in charge separation.

Page 96: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Semiconductor detectors

• Charge separation causes electric field which opposes further diffusion ( and sweeps free charge out of depletion layer)

Page 97: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Semiconductor Detectors

• Depletion region widened by reverse bias voltage.

– Thickness ~ 100’s m

• Ionisation in depletion layer collected on strips.

– In a 300 m depletion layer will give ~ 25000 electron-hole pairs for a MIP

– Can “mass produce” pre-amplifiers with noise ~ 1000 electron-equivalent.

Page 98: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Semiconductor – Pulse Shape

• View junction as a parallel plate capacitor.• As ionization charge moves within depletion

region, charge flows into the “plates” of the capacitor to maintain constant voltage.

• If charge, e, moves by distance dx then the charge dQ flows into the diode:

• Pulse shape determined by drift of charges in junction.

d

dxedQ

.

Page 99: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

High Precision Silicon Vertex Detectors

This matrix of silicon microstrip detectors was at the heart of the ALEPH detector at LEP

Page 100: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Tracking With Precision Vertex Detectors

1 cm

bbZ 0event observed in the Delphi Vertex detector

Page 101: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Tracking With Precision Vertex Detectors

1 cmbbZ 0

event observed in the SLD detector

Page 102: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Movement of charges in gases• At modest E fields, electrons and

positive ions drift at constant velocity– Careful choice of gas to avoid absorbing

electrons.– If B field is present, drift is at an angle to

the lines of E (Lorentz angle)– Can use time for electrons to arrive at anode

to get distance of track from wire.

• If electrons gain enough energy between collisions (ie. In one mean free path) multiplication of electron/ion pairs results ( needs large E )

Page 103: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Movement of charges in gases• Behaviour of electrons and ions in gas

depends on details of gas mixture and electric (and magnetic) field– Drift velocity, Lorentz velocity, gain

• Ions, being much heavier than electrons, have slower drift velocity and do not give amplification.

• Like, Si detectors, velocity of charges determines pulse shape. – Fast part from electrons, slow “tail” from

ions

Page 104: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Gas ionisation detectors

• Thin (20–30m diameter) anode wires provide gain, due to electron avalanche in high field region near the wire ( E 1/r )

• Many variants– Geiger counter

– Multi-wire proportional chamber MWPC

– Drift chamber

– Time Projection Chamber TPC

– MicroStrip Gas Chamber MSGC

Page 105: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Liquid Ionization Detectors

• Usually liquid noble gas – eg. Argon.• No gain ( mean free path short, so

electrons don’t get enough energy to cause further ionization)

• Use in calorimeters ( e.g. H1 , Atlas )– Don’t care about multiple scattering

– High density many electron/ion pairs

– No gain less danger of signal saturation

Page 106: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

• Reminder: Cerenkov angle and intensity depend on particle velocity and refractive index of the medium

• If momentum is known, measurements of give and hence particle mass and type

• Cerenkov detectors used for /K separation at medium or high energies

nc 1

cos

Cerenkov counters for particle identification

ccd

dn

2sin

Page 107: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Cerenkov detectors• Cerenkov counters consist of radiator

medium plus a photon detector• Use of liquid, gas or aerogel radiators gives a

range of refractive index• Photon detectors usually either PM tubes or

doped gas ionisation detector• Different detector layouts:

– Threshold Cerenkov– Differential Cerenkov– Ring-imaging Cerenkov (RICH)

• Very large liquid filled detectors used for neutrino detection

Page 108: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Aerogel

• Silica based “foam”. • Tune refractive index by fraction of air

( ~ 99.8% air)

Page 109: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Super-K: Large Water Cerenkov detector for

neutrinos

Page 110: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Threshold Cerenkov• All charged particle above threshold will

give a signal.• Adjust threshold by adjusting refractive index

– Gas for high threshold (has low , adjust with pressure)

– Liquid for low threshold (high )

Particle

Cherenkov light Mirror

PM

Threshold Cherenkov

Page 111: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Differential Cerenkov• Use circular annular collimator slit – only

accepts light at a range of angles– Only get signal if particle in right range.

• Only works if particles on-axis– Useful for “tagging” particles in a low intensity

beam,

Particle

SphericalMirrorRingshapedslit

PM

PM

DifferentialCherenkov

Page 112: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Ring-imaging Cerenkov

Page 113: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

The DELPHI Detector

DELPHI at LEP features extensive particle identification capability from its TPC and RICH counters

Page 114: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Conclusion: Aims

• To introduce the interactions of fast particles and high-energy photons in materials, particularly those types of interaction which are important for particle detection and measurement.

Page 115: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Conclusion:“Learning outcomes”

• Understand those properties of stable and long-lived particles important for their detection. Able to perform calculations of scattering kinematics and mean decay paths for relativistic particles.

Page 116: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Conclusion:“Learning outcomes”

• Understand the variation of ionisation energy loss for charged particles as a function of velocity, as given by the Bethe-Bloch formula. Appreciate the physical origin of the various terms in this formula. Able to describe the underlying physics of other important energy-loss processes.

Page 117: Putting it all together - Particle Detectors Writeup for 3 rd section:

Conclusion:“Learning outcomes”

• Understand the operation of certain types of detector. Able to analyse the effect of counting fluctuations on the performance of detectors. Understand the response of detectors to different particle types. Know the design elements of a "general purpose" particle detector.