push-pull technology in ethiopia progress and · pdf filepush-pull technology in ethiopia...

21
Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges Sue Edwards, on behalf of colleagues in Melkassa Research Station (MARC), and Institute for Sustainable Development (ISD)

Upload: voque

Post on 08-Mar-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

Push-Pull Technology in EthiopiaProgress and Challenges

Sue Edwards, on behalf of colleagues in Melkassa Research Station (MARC),

andInstitute for Sustainable Development (ISD)

Page 2: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

The ADOPT Project, 2011-2014

• Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology (ADOPT): a conservation agriculture approach for smallholder cereal-livestock production in drier areas to withstand climate change

• Funded by the European Union, and

• Coordinated by ICIPE

• 3-year project started in January 2011 with a ‘no-cost’ extension into 2014

• MARC focused on research aspects, including with farmers through Farmer Research Groups, and works in Eastern Haraghe and Lakes Rift Valley

• ISD focused on extension aspects, with some in-field research, and works in South Wollo Zone and Oromiya Special Zone (Kemissie) of Amhara Region, and Central and South Zones of Tigray Region

Page 3: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

Ethiopia - environmental constraints and where PPT promoted since 2011

Environmental Constraints

Dry and/or cold areas with low production potential

Low soil suitability

Low and erratic rainfall

Steep slopes and mountains

Severe and very severe land degradation

Low to medium climatic production potential

High climatic

production potential

Source: FAO

Where PPT has been promoted

since 2011

Page 4: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

Major achievements of MARC 2012• 6 FRGs were established in 6 ADOPT project sites

• These FRGs, (experts, DAs and research staff) trained on FRGconcept, push-pull technology and ADOPT project

24/11/2015

Miesso

Habro Mechara/Darolebu

Page 5: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

Push pull technology effect on stem borer and striga:consolidated data from 2012

24/11/2015

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

% infestation Damage score(1-5)

Striga count perm2

28.0

2.3 3.9

61.0

3.210.0

Push-Pull Control

Page 6: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

24/11/2015

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Push-Pull Control Push-Pull Control Push-Pull Control

MARC MEISSO HABRO FTC

2.4 3.6 2.4 3.4 2.1 2.5

% infestation

Damage score (1-5)

Stem borer infestation in the 3 research locations

Page 7: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1 2 3 4

Intercropping Monocropping

No

of

Stri

gaP

er

Met

er

Squ

are

Two Week Intervals

Mean Number of Striga per square Meter at two-week intervals starting from the first emergence in 2012/Darolebu

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 2 3 4

Page 8: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

ISD’s Experience

Page 9: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

Result from ADOPT 2012 in South Wollo

• Orientation in push-pull given to 340 participants in the agricultural sector including 238 farmers

• 87 farmers had good demo plots (shortage of planting material restricted the number of farmers)

• 203 farmers, extension personnel and local policy makers made field visits in October and November 2012

• The records from the 10 best plots in farmers’ fields of maize and sorghum showed:• Maize yields were double or more the national average of 2.2-2.5 t/ha

• Sorghum yields were 50% of more the national average of 1.7-2.1 t/ha

• All farmers used their own preferred varieties

Page 10: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

6.2

4.8

6.8

6.6

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

W/r Ayal Abera

Tefera Yimer

Belay Ali

Awel Sied

Grain yield in t/ha

Farm

ers'

nam

e

Maize yields from model farmers' plots, South Wollo, 2012

Page 11: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

4.6

3.4

3.4

3.2

3.8

3.7

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

W/r Zewude Seid

Mohammed Yimam

Eshetu Mekonnen

Gurshawu Teshome

Sisay Abate

Sied Eshetu

Grain yield converted to t/ha

Farm

er'

s n

ame

e

Sorghum yields from PPT farmers' plots in 2012 in South Wollo

Page 12: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

Opportunities of PPT reported by farmers and extension personnel

• Moisture retention in the soil over dry gaps and after the rains end

• Ready source of animal feed, particularly the Desmodium, in the growing season when grazing is restricted, but particularly in the dry season (hence, farmers are reluctant to allow Desmodium to produce seed)

• Builds on the advantages of row planting and provides weed control if the Desmodium establishes well (a productive form of conservation agriculture)

• Once a farmer has implemented and seen the advantages of PPT, she/he continues with it

• The 1:5 model farmer to neighbors is an effective means of promoting PPT

Page 13: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

Controlling Orobanche in Faba Bean:piloted in South Wollo in 2014

12 11.2

19.6

22.4

15 14.3 14.2 14

0

5

10

15

20

25

FA BA BEA N + D ESMOD IUM

FA BA BEA N + MUSTA RD

FA BA BEA N + B IOFERTIL IZ ER

FA BA BEA N ONLY

Result of growing Desmodium or Mustard on Orobanche stem

counts and Faba bean yield in Haroye FTC

Average Orobanche per plot Yield q/ha

8.49.8

11.412.4

18.3317 16.6 16.5

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

FA BA BEA N + D ESMOD IUM

FA BA BEA N + MUSTA RD

FA BA BEA N + B IOFERTIL IZ ER

F A BA BEA N O NLY

Result of growing Desmodium or Mustard on Orobanche stem countss

and Faba bean yield in Kedjo FTC

Average Orobanche per plot Yield q/ha

Page 14: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

CHALLENGES

Page 15: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

For Farmers

• Need for flexibility in choice of crop and planting / growing method• To cope and respond to the way the rains start, e.g. replacing longer growing

season sorghum/maize by shorter season tef if rains are delayed

• To maintain basic crop rotation, the basis of traditional soil fertility maintenance and household food crop needs, cereal/pulse/oil crop

• Dry season plowing for control of weeds and soil-borne pests and diseases

• Small size of cultivated fields, and most fields narrow and long

• Reluctance to risk household food security by putting even a minimal cultivated area (10 x 10 m) under a new technology

Page 16: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

For Farmers cont.

• Germination and establishment of Desmodium (very small seed)• Germinate and grow seedlings in April – 6-8 weeks before rains expected

• Grass border rows• Take up essential crop growing area of small fields

• Elephant grass can harbor rodents

• Brachiaria attracts birds when it flowers and sets seed

• Brachiaria roots are tough and interfere with plowing

Page 17: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

For Extension• Availability of planting material, particularly Desmodium seed

• High cost of Desmodium seed – a woman farmer in Rama sells Silver Leaf Desmodium seed @ 500 ETB/kg (US 45/kg)

• If farmers and FTCs produce seed, • who is going to pay them?

• What is a reasonable price that farmers see as affordable?

• Training and supply of inputs must be well ahead of the start of the main rains, i.e. integrated into the overall extension schedule

• Integration of PPT with improved animal husbandry, particularly for dairy goats

Page 18: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

For Extension cont

• Growing seedlings of Desmodium ahead of time to be ready for transplanting at the start of the rains (proven effective in 2014)

• Maintaining Desmodium through the dry season to supply cuttings to farmers at the start of the rains

• Campaigns, with appropriate incentives, for seed collection of Silver Leaf Desmodium naturalized in many places after it was introduced as a potential forage in the 1980s and 1990s.

Page 19: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

For Research

• Alternative crops to grow with Desmodium in the dry season where irrigation is available, e.g. tomato, faba bean

• Farmers recognize the indigenous Desmodium uncinatum ‘tmero’ as a valuable weed to provide animal fodder

• Developing ‘tmero’ that is a non-climbing annual as an intercrop with tef where Striga infestation is developing

• Integration of PPT with improved animal husbandry

Page 20: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

PPT demonstration field in Aksum University, 2012 Field visit to Farmer Sissay’s PPT field in South Wollo, 2013

Page 21: Push-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and · PDF filePush-Pull Technology in Ethiopia Progress and Challenges ... •Adaptation and Dissemination of the ‘Push-Pull’ Technology

Thank you for listening

Farmer Zewdie and her PPT sorghum field in Haik, 2012