public services innovation
DESCRIPTION
Are public services really so uninnovative? How and why do they innovate?TRANSCRIPT
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Session 1B
The challenge of innovation in public
servicesIAN MILES
[email protected] http://LES.MAN.AC.UK/PREST/http://LES.MAN.AC.UK/CRIC/
PREST, IoIR, University of ManchesterPREST, IoIR, University of Manchester
THE FUTURE OF RESEARCH IN EUROPE – AKNOWLEDGE BASE FOR POLICY AND
MANAGEMENT
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Public Services (innovation) in Crisis?
• Funding crises• New challenges• Governance• Regulatory reform• Modernisation• Inefficiency• Throwing money at problems• Initiative overload•Tech fixes…
MPs demand transparent government IT projectsSelect Committee calls for an end to 'appalling waste of
public money‘ Bryan Glick, Computing 22 Jul 2004MPs are calling for much greater openness on government IT projects to prevent an 'appalling waste of public money and distress caused to thousands of people‘…
U.K. government hit with another large computer failure - biggest in U.K. government history
ComputerWorld | NOVEMBER 26, 2004 | Laura Rohde, IT system failures continued to plague the U.K. government this week, when as many as 80,000 civil servants working for the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) had to
deal with what is being described in the local press as the biggest computer crash in government history…
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Drawing on http://www.step.no and also other CRIC, PREST work
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
The challenge of innovation in public
services
• Conceptual
• Research/empirical/methodological
• Policy/practical
“Challenge? What challenge?”
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
“Challenge? What challenge?”
1 Conceptual Challenges
“Challenge? What challenge?”
INNOVATION:• Beyond technological
innovation• Beyond classic product
and process innovation• Policy innovation,
organisational innovation, and more
• Innovation versus change
PUBLIC SERVICES:• Public versus non-market:
only those provided by the state? What definition of state provision?
• Only those in services sectors (not all nationalised industries) with large levels of state ownership? Or at least with traditionally large levels in most countries?
• Huge variety cross-sector, cross-country, in modes of governance and organisation
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
NACE "Nomenclature statistique des Activités économiques dans la Communauté Européenne" - Statistical classification of economic activities in the
European CommunityServices firms and sectors --economic activities covered by Sections G to K and M to O and the units that carry out those activities. ( Generate almost 70% of EU GDP )
Grouped by activity - not by public/private, market-nonmarket
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
NACE groups EU employment, 2000 %
G Wholesale and retail trade 22.2
H Hotels and restaurants 6.0
I Transport, storage, communication 9.2
J Financial intermediation 5.1
K Real estate, renting and business activities 13.0
L Public administration, defence; compulsory Social Security 11.4
M Education 10.0
N Health and social work 14.3
O Other community, social and personal service activities 7.0
P Private households with employed persons 1.6
Q Extra-territorial organisations and bodies 0.1
Total services 100
NACE
42
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
NACE groups
G Wholesale and retail trade 22.2
H Hotels and restaurants 6.0
I Transport, storage, communication 9.2
J Financial intermediation 5.1
K Real estate, renting and business activities 13.0
L Public administration, defence; compulsory Social Security 11.4
M Education 10.0
N Health and social work 14.3
O Other community, social and personal service activities 7.0
P Private households with employed persons 1.6
Q Extra-territorial organisations and bodies 0.1
Total services 100
NACE
42
Non-market services: public administration and defence,
health, education , community services, etc. However, the non-market sections contain several activities, which are market activities (e.g. driving
schools, cinema, hairdressing, or health services supplied
through the market).
The market sections are also liable to contain some activities, which are non-
market (Official statisticians mention, for instance, e.g. central banking – but there are “service activities ancilliary to…” most sectors! And broadcasting and certain
other important activities…).
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Service Activities• Not so much transforming materials to make artefacts,
as transforming:– The state of artefacts and environments (physical processing)– The state of humans and other organisms (people processing)– The availability and nature of data, information and knowledge
(information processing)
• Huge variety of activities, but frequently service products are characterised by:– Intangibility (issues of transport, storage, coterminality)
– Interactivity (Production and consumption often intertwined)
– Information-intensity (Much specificity as to service, client)
• Public services of all types, but largest groups are person- and information-processing.
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Manchester PUBLIN (health) results ~
• Concept of innovation recognised and people can work with it (to some extent) in interviews, but term “innovation” often not employed – many other terms used.
• “Innovation” often seen as fashionable jargon – or as ‘new technology’ or problem-solving
• Or as a matter of adoption of top-down guidelines, meeting targets (important procedural innovation).
• Often incremental developments, often hard to establish boundaries between innovation and replication.
• Huge number and range of developments, not subject to much direct recording/compilation in databases… Though some recording through incentive schemes, and through efforts to impose IPR models…
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Some examples of innovation…
• Genetic screening• Intraocular lenses• Health informatics• Electronic patient records system – huge scale, clear
benefits (and professional risk perception)• NHS Direct: “most radical innovation” in recent history of
health service”• NICE• Tier Two – reduced waiting lists through appropriate
secondary care rather than using hospitals• Creation of new mental health trust – specialisation• Pilot “out of hours” link with Aus/NZ consultants• Modernisation Agency
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
“Challenge? What challenge?”
2 Research Challengesα Underresearched – like services innovation, of which
it is part – unclear how far concepts and instruments will work – though we can expect many points of convergence (from life cycles to product
champions, complementary assets to radical innovations).
β Search for commonalities, specificities or both – assimilationist / demarcationist / synthesist
γ Units of analysis, problems of large systems, compounded by problems of access and
politicisation of issues.
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
α Services Innovation• Neglected till recently – IT revolution and service
economy have finally prompted attention – analysis still limited, but some results include:
• Often relatively low levels of innovation effort (at least as measured conventionally) – but many exceptions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Wholesale
Transport
Telecoms
Financial
Computer S
Technical S
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
α Services Innovation• Neglected till recently – IT revolution and service economy have finally prompted attention – analysis still limited, but some results include:
• Often relatively low levels of innovation effort (at least as measured conventionally) – but many exceptions
• Hard to protect via patents – push to increase patentability but (a) controversial (software and BP patenting) and (b) little hard evidence that service innovation is more vulnerable to copying in general.
• Professional inputs often a vector of change• Often poor link to innovation systems, “science base”• Organised in specific ways – often not counted as R&D, often not
R&D departments or managers• Organisational innovation, and changes in relations between client
and service (delivery etc.) are very important. Established indicators may be inadequate.
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
• Neglected till recently – IT revolution and service economy have finally prompted attention – analysis still limited, but some results include:
• Often relatively low levels of innovation effort (at least as measured conventionally) – but many exceptions
• Hard to protect via patents – push to increase patentability but (a) controversial (software and BP patenting) and (b) little hard evidence that service innovation is more vulnerable to copying in general.
• Professional inputs often a vector of change• Often poor link to innovation systems, “science base”• Organised in specific ways – often not counted as R&D, often not
R&D departments or managers• Organisational innovation, and changes in relations between client
and service (delivery etc.) are very important. Established indicators may be inadequate.
α Services Innovation
Product (PD)Only
ProcessOnly (PC)
OrganizationalOnly (ORG)
PD & PC
PD &ORG
PC & ORG
PC ORGPC & ORG
Key
Manufacturing
22%
23%
11% 8%
5%
26%PD
PD & PC
PD &ORG
DK / None= 5%
Services
10%
6%
8% 37%
9%
19%PD
PC ORG
PD & PC
PD &ORG
PC & ORG
DK / None= 12%
Manufacturing : Product & Process = 71% Services : Organisational + = 54%
Tether and Howells 2004 study
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
α Services Innovation– Intangibility (issues of transport, storage, coterminality)
– Interactivity (Production and consumption often intertwined)
– Information-intensity (Much specificity as to service, client)
• Need to relate service product and production process to service client – often extended affair, degree to which individual details involve specialised or customised production varies immensely. Affects scope for innovation oif various kinds.
• Public services have to confront the variety of human characteristics with the dictates of large systems and bureaucratic rationality.
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
β Private == Public services Markets as external selection mechanism: consumer choice
Competition between firms: marketing, sales, etc. May be transnational competition, self-service alternatives.
Customer Relationship and Supply chain management
Regulation often higher in services than manufacturing
Flexibility, e.g. in employment terms; Rewards
Profit-driven: strong incentive Rents on innovation
Public policy driven services, sometimes heavily influenced by public attitudes and media renderings of opinion and service quality.
Some forms of competition and” coexistence, with private and voluntary sectors and individual self-service.
Bureaucratic systems and administration. Employee lobbies.
(Nominally) strong emphasis on Equity and related issues, on ethics and privacy issues.
Personal and professional incentives
Public goods
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
γ Are there Specific/Stronger Obstacles to Innovation?• Would expect issues to arise concerning regulations, large technical systems, workforce issues (esp. professionalism and status conflicts), reward structures, etc.
• Also (like other services) some strategies to deal with intangibility etc (e.g. targets, tests, credentials) and some to deal with “public” characteristics – esp marketisation, competition, consumer-centric, cosnumer choice…
• Some results from PUBLIN health…
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
γ Specific/Stronger Obstacles to Innovation? 2
• Internal diffusion / roll-out repeatedly a major issue - much effort now being spent on identifying, codifying and spreading good practice, new procedures. Lack of structures and mechanisms for organisational learning seen as major issue – efforts being made here. But…
• Initiatives to diffuse good practice seen as “short-lived” – reorganisations promote lack of corporate memory
• Infrastructural and procedural/occupational heritage and legacy, entrenched practice and procedures are commonly experienced.
• ‘Professionalised’ resistance – e.g. clinicians, ambulance service form “disconnected hierarchies”, some self-governing professionals, others “quasi-military” forces. Lack of common command and control structures – conflict with established roles, politics, “empires”
• In particular lack of commitment to consumer orientation was often cited as a major issue (mirroring political rhetoric in UK).
• Public resistance to reorganisation – though public seem very open to new ways of operating
• Lack of “ownership” of innovation – top-down initiatives – • …and IP issues
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
γ Specific/Stronger Obstacles to Innovation? 3
• Resistance to ‘out of the box’ thinking plus risk aversion (generic issue in public sector – related to nature of service (large-scale and severe risks) and to political cycles. High public/political profile plus blame culture, accountability and risk of litigation (but US?).
• Pace and scale of change (NHS in particular) – shifting targets and absence of opportunity to reflect/asses consequences
• Very complex organisation – composed of multiple tiered interlinked systems with - Huge staff numbers; Many occupations; Many organisational arrangements; Many service processes
• Lack of “patient information connectivity” between actors in system• Lack of dedicated budgets for innovation at relevant (local, Trust)
level.• Some areas (mental health) not high profile priority for investment (cf.
surgery)• Requirement to consult, lack of clear picture of all eventual effects
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Polic
y f
or
inn
ovati
on
?
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
– or Public Sector Opportunities?
• High level of staff expertise, creativity, problem solving• Strong public spirit ethos, motivations beyond personal financial
rewards• Controversial shifts underway (e.g. competitive framework of
Foundation hospitals) believed by proponents to increase innovation by:– Allowing for flexibility and experimentation within target culture and
common standards– Incentivise staff (and management) financially, status-wise, and through
improved service quality– Improve patient choice (will drive resources as money follows patients)
aand “consumer” feedback into innovation process– Management draws on external sources for “directed creativity” and
organisational innovation and knowledge mananagement…• Conscious efforts at innovation management (under various guises)
γ Specific/Stronger Obstacles to Innovation?
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
In our studies, the innovations exciting management are:• Those more at the strategic/management level
• Organisational: governance relation changes, new agencies, etc
• New roles, responsibilities, new ways of operating (need for knowledge management capacity), role in training
• Technical and technological (huge) – some systemic, esp.IT-based,
• New specific practices e.g. round pharmaceuticals, clinical practice, techniques, devices, etc. Huge range of artefacts involved. Again, much IT impact.
• Often technological innovation closely tied to further organisational/process change/innovation
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Implications for Research• Many commonalities – many ideas and instruments can be borrowed
• Different selection processes internally and externally. Processes of diversity generation too.
• Much is public-private mixture (many kinds)• Public services highlight areas where innovation
studies are weakSome efforts underway
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
“Challenge? What challenge?”
3 Policy Challenges• Research Policy – bringing in the public
sector where it is absent, taking better account of it where it is present…
• Public sector policy – governance, regulatory reform, efficiency, modernisation… Building innovation into public policy… Assessing innovation processes and impacts to guide policy, validate expenditure
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Many major initiatives with innovation implications• Could we have innovation audits? We have yet to measure public service
innovation and impacts systematically (several partial attempts)!•Can we do better in assessing costs and benefits of attempts to impose certain “private sector models” on the public sector – are there other elements of innovation management that should be engaged with (first?)
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Public Sector “Modernisation”
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Modernisation Agency• Est. 2001 to support NHS and partner organisations in modernising services and improving experiences and outcomes for patients.
• Has focused on four areas:– improving access,– increasing local support,– raising standards of care,– capturing and sharing knowledge widely.
• “10 high impact changes”:– Treat day surgery as the norm for elective surgery – Improve access to key diagnostic tests – Manage variation in patient discharge – Manage variation in patient admission – Avoid unnecessary follow-ups – Increase the reliability of performing therapeutic interventions through a Care Bundle
approach – Apply a systematic approach to care for people with long-term conditions – Improve patient access by reducing the number of queues – Optimise patient flow using process templates – Redesign and extend roles
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
Public Service Innovation…• …is a topic crying out for research
• Policymakers desperately want good knowledge
• Innovation studies themselves can benefit from looking at this
• Its sort of important too…
• Must not be a ghetto!
PRIME Conference - Manchester, January 2005
IoIRIoIRInstitute of Innovation Research
Harold Hankins BuildingThe University of Manchester
Manchester UK
End of presentation