public power member and broker session v3 [read-only] · 2019. 10. 29. · 7/31/2013 2 distribution...
TRANSCRIPT
7/31/2013
1
Public Power Member and Broker Session
Dennis SaccoDirector of Risk Management
New York Power Authority
Member of the AEGIS Risk Management Advisory Committee (RMAC)
Public Power Member and Broker Session
James J. (Jim) JuraCEO & General Manager
Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Member of the AEGIS Board of Directors
7/31/2013
2
Distribution of Membership
Public Power(Municipal)
16.38%
As of December 31, 2012 Membership of 315Distribution of Ownership Type
Public Power(State Project)
4.52%
Cooperative6.60%
Investor Owned72.50%
Public Power Member and Broker Session
Michael J. Hyland, P.E. Senior Vice President – Engineering Services
American Public Power Association
7/31/2013
3
Public Power Operational Risk Management
• Disaster management
• Reliable utility management
Reliability benchmarking
Safety compliance
Workforce development
System improvement
• Distribution power supply management
APPA’s View From DC
Disaster Management: Superstorm Sandy
• History of effective storm restoration
• Increased reliability expectations from consumers
• APPA membership initiatives
Mutual Aid Task Force
CAPP
NIAC JEEC – NERC ESCC
The New Norm?
7/31/2013
4
Reliable Utility Management
• Program started by APPA in 2005
• Provides public power with a platform to benchmark their utility operations through a self-check format
• Four focus areas
• Applications good for a three-year time period
• Applications are graded by a panel of APPA member experts
Reliable Public Power Provider Program – RP3
RP3
• Based on 100 point system
25 for each focus area
• Reliability – indices, disaster planning, mutual aid
• Safety – incident rate, ‘safety culture’ measures
• Workforce – succession planning, training, IDP’s
• System improvement – R&D, O&M projects
184 Systems and Growing
7/31/2013
5
Safety – All or Nothing…
6.09
9.20
11.51
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 1 2
RP3 Cycles 5 and 6 Average OSHA Incidence Rate by Number of "No" and "No Answer" Responses to Safety Questions on RP3 Application
Ave
rage
Inc
iden
ce R
ate
(Cal
cula
ted
per
OS
HA
Met
hodo
logy
)
What Gets Measured…..Gets Done!
Mean and Median for 67 RP3 Applicant Utilities
RP3 Cycle 5 IR RP3 Cycle 7 IR
Mean 6.61 4.79
Median 5.75 3.76
7/31/2013
6
Power Supply Management
• Generation at a crossroads
• Integration of renewable energy
• Pressure to lower carbon production
• Pressure to supply low-cost energy and services
• Pressure to adapt to new technologies
Solar, Wind, DR....Oh My!
Public Power Member and Broker Session
Sandy Meyers, CPA, CPCU, ARM, AINS, CISMDirector – Risk Management
City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri
7/31/2013
7
Challenges of Public Risk Management
• Time-consuming and detailed
• Every entity does it a little differently
• Limits competition
• Focuses on best price and not best fit
• Does not allow you to leverage your relationships
Competitive Bidding
Challenges of Public Risk Management
• It is a relationship-driven business
• Market-driven commodity
• Standard bidding practices don’t always work in your favor
• Utility expertise is a must for your brokers and insurers
Insurance Is Not Another “Widget”
7/31/2013
8
Challenges of Public Risk Management
• Limited staffing and experience
• Long learning curve
• Travel and training funds are restricted
• Consulting services are a luxury
• Diverse risks must be addressed with limited funds
Limited Resources
Challenges of Public Risk Management
• Diverse operating risks are complex and have a long learning curve
• Operating areas manage their own risks
• Risks are not openly shared or communicated
• Risk managers sometimes lack authority to intervene in decisions
Managing Risk Silos
7/31/2013
9
New Risk Manager Lessons Learned
• Which part(s) of the process can be adjusted to better serve the unique market?
• Is it within legal, policy, and ethical constraints?
• Ask for support from executive staff to make adjustments where acceptable
Flexibility In Your Bidding Process
New Risk Manager Lessons Learned
• Build strong internal and external relationships
• Foster trust and sharing of information
• Relationships can be leveraged when they are needed most
Relationships Are The Key
7/31/2013
10
New Risk Manager Lessons Learned
• Leverage brokers
• Leverage peers
• Leverage insurance and risk management associations
• Take training or obtain certification(s)
• Ask for support and help when needed
Seek All Available Resources
New Risk Manager Lessons Learned
• Learn the details of the business
• Ask lots of questions
• Challenge yourself and others to consider alternatives
• Don’t accept the way things have always been done
Details, Details, Details
7/31/2013
11
New Risk Manager Lessons Learned
• Opens up communication about risks
• Identifies and shares risk tolerances
• Helps prioritize limited resources
• Builds consensus across a multidiscipline utility
• Shared ownership of risks
Enterprise Risk Management Is Valuable
Public Power Member and Broker Session
Cindy A. Stevens MBA, CRM, CICInsurance Program Manager, Enterprise Risk Management
Colorado Springs Utilities
7/31/2013
12
Colorado Springs Utilities
The “Power” of Public Power
2012 Colorado Association of Municipal Utilities
Electricity Providers by Ownership
Ownership Number % of Total
Publicly Owned 2,006 61.7%
Cooperatives 874 26.9%
Investor-Owned 194 6.0%
Power Marketers 168 5.2%
Federal Power Agencies 9 0.3%
Total 3,251 100%
Publicly Owned62%
Investor-Owned6%
Power Marketers5%Federal Power Agencies
0%
Cooperatives27%
Electricity Providers in America
7/31/2013
13
Background – Colorado Springs Utilities (CSU)
• Est. in 1878, an enterprise of the City of Colorado Springs
• Colorado Springs population ~429,000
• Electric: 213,000 customers, 99.99% reliable, generation = 1,100 MW
• 58 substations, 235 miles transmission
• ~3,400 miles distribution (~75% UG)
• $1.05 billion annual budget
4 Services – Water, Waste Water, Electric and Gas
2012 Official Statement
Coal39%
Hydro & Renewable12%
Other4%
Gas45%
CSU Electric GenerationResources by Fuel Type
Challenges – Striking a Balance
• 2010 strong Mayor – “small government” advocate
• City Council = utilities board
• City budget constraints, outsourcing initiatives
• Failed initiative to sell utilities’ electric generation
• Study to decommission Drake coal plant in 15-20 years
• Colorado government immunity act – waivers
Trying to restore “caps” on monetary damages ($350,000 per individual, $990,000 per occurrence as of 7/1/2013)
Politics “Unusual” – Utilities Versus City
7/31/2013
14
Challenges – Striking a Balance
• CSU’s water system – 26 dams, 13 counties
• 80% water supply from western slope – risk
• $1 billion 62-mile pipeline/WTP project from Pueblo Dam to City of Colorado Springs 2016
New Projects Versus Aging Infrastructure
Pueblo Reservoir and Dam
Challenges – Striking a Balance
• Waldo Canyon June – July, 2012
• 2 deaths, 347 homes destroyed
• Human-caused, still under criminal investigation
• Assets threatened: finished water treatment plants and hydro
Ute Pass – 2 MGD
Pine Valley – 88 MGD
McCullough – 75 MGD
Mesa – 42 MGD
Tesla Hydro Electric Facility
Wildland-Urban Interface – Wildfires
7/31/2013
15
Waldo Canyon Fire – June 26, 2012
Challenges – Striking a Balance
• Assets threatened
Several water storage tanks, Twin Rocks pump station
34.5 kV electric transmission line – Green Mtn. to Rampart
Northfield watershed
Wildland-Urban Interface – Wildfires
ReservoirDate
CompletedCapacity in
Gallons
Capacity in Acre
Feet
Nichols 1913 191,000,000 586
Northfield 1890 90,000,000 276
Rampart 1970 13,318,000,000 40,871
7/31/2013
16
Fire Progression:
June 23 2,500 acres
June 24 3,600 acres
June 25 4,500 acres
June 26 15,622 acres
June 27-28 16,750 acres
June 29 17,073 acres
June 30 17,650 acres
July 1-6 18,247 acres
Challenges – Striking a Balance
• CSU’s Wildland Fire Team (WFT) – instrumental to saving CSU infrastructure
• Minimal physical damage incurred
• Versatility – fire and FEMA trained emergency responders
• Unique – WFT includes experts from all four services
Electric, gas, water, waste water
Wildland-Urban Interface – Wildfires
7/31/2013
17
Waldo Canyon Fire – Rampart Reservoir
Challenges – Striking a Balance
• July 30, 2012
• Over $15 million “uninsurable” damages
Two damaged pipelines, two lost reservoirs
CSU’s watershed = USFS land 59% of area moderate to high soil burn severity
Use grants as a funding source!
Wildland-Urban Interface – Post Waldo Fire – Northfield Flood
Resources: www.inciweb.org, www.springsgov.com
7/31/2013
18
Challenges – Striking a Balance
• July 11, 2013
• Two deaths, 503 destroyed homes
• North end of CSU service territory
• CSU’s Wildland Fire Team deployed immediately
• No CSU infrastructure damage
Wildland-Urban Interface – Black Forest Fire
Colorado Springs Utilities Wildland Fire Team
Thank you!
www.csu.org [email protected] 719.668.8705
7/31/2013
19
Electric Risk Assessments
Scot Macomber, CGEManager Loss Control Utility Operations
AEGIS Insurance Services, Inc.
Purpose of a Risk Assessment
• Help members identify potential problems and concerns
• Provide the AEGIS Underwriting division with additional information regarding the company
7/31/2013
20
Scheduling an Assessment
Opening PresentationRisk Assessment Overview
AircraftStrike
2%
ElectricContact
66%
Other3%Failure
to Supply4%
Explosionor Fire20%
VehicleAccident
5%
7/31/2013
21
Topics Covered
• Substation design, construction, and inspections
• Transmission design, construction, and inspections
• Distribution design, construction and inspections
• Vegetation management / tree trimming
• Pole inspections
Topics Covered
• Joint use / joint ownership pole practices
• Downed wire dispatch procedures
• Public safety and awareness
• Environmental programs
• Occupational safety
7/31/2013
22
New Topics
• Dams
• Contractor safety review and evaluation
Wrap-Up / Closing Meeting
7/31/2013
23
Wrap-Up / Closing MeetingFrequent Suggestions – Substations
Wrap-Up / Closing MeetingFrequent Suggestions – Distribution
7/31/2013
24
Wrap-Up / Closing MeetingFrequent Suggestions – Public Safety and Awareness
aegislink.com