public policy formulation: process and tools...campusvue student management system (2012 - present)...
TRANSCRIPT
KENYATTA UNIVERSITY
ERP Implementation at Kenyatta University
2007 – 2017
Prof. Paul K. Wainaina PhD. Ag. Vice-Chancellor
KENET Annual Heads of Institution Forum
December, 2017
ERP SYSTEMS
PANASEA (1990-2007)
UNIPLUS (2007-2012)
CAMPUSVUE STUDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (2012 - present)
ERP (Enterprise resource planning) systems enable us to control all key functions in an organization by using
unified information architecture.
Prior to 1990 key functions at KU were captured
through spreadsheets
1. PANASEA System (1990-2007)
Leveraged on advent of PC technology - Disk Operating System based system
Transcript printing
Weakness
Tedious and time consuming
Unable to report on differentiated categories of students
ERP Implementation in Kenyatta University
School A
Students’ data
School B
Students’ data
School C
Students’ data
School D
Students’ data
separate machines for different schools
2. Uniplus Software (2007-2012)
Leveraged on advent of database technology that enabled all students regardless of discipline to be stored in a single database
DBMS software – central machine with all the schools
Improved retrieval of students information
Saved time
ERP Imp Cont’d
Weakness
Limited to main campus – no facility for creation of additional campuses on one platform
Security challenges – no audit trails on who enters and changes records in the system
Pre-designed reports/data entry forms lacked capability for end-user customization
Weak vendor support
Uniplus
Main campus
Uniplus
Campus B
Uniplus
Campus D
Uniplus
Campus C
Uniplus
Campus A
No linkage
ERP Imp Cont’d
Different data sources for admission and student administration systems – Duplication of work and data – islands of information that are not linked
Data capture and retrieval tedious and time consuming
Student registration, time-tabling, transcript, graduation scheduling and hostel allocation activities, difficult to perform
Uniplus De-Commissioned on 30th July, 2012
ERP Imp Cont’d
System A
Admission
System B
Finance
System C
Accommodation
System D
Academics
Systems working as isolated islands
3. CampusVue Student Management System (2012 - present)
Commissioned 1st August, 2012.
Leveraged on availability of network infrastructure, internet and well-powered data centres
Ability to create, manage and report accurately on multiple campuses.
Main Campus
Central deployment
site
Campus
1
Campus
2
Campus 3 Campus
4
Campus 5
ERP Imp Cont’d
Seamlessly integrated Financial Systems, Student Smart Card System, Payment Gateway/Banking System, Human Resources System, eHospital system and Student Class attendance system.
Flexible Student Enrolment (No overlap of terms and different modes of study)
Improved Student Data and Financial Management throughout the entire student life cycle (i.e. from admission to graduation and Alumni)
Weakness
No local support (vendor resides in Bangalore, India support is through skype
ERP Imp Cont’d
CampusVue at a Glance
LESSONS LEARNT
1. Implementation: full & sudden implementation causes confusion and chaos. Phased implementation preferred
2. Thorough analysis of business requirements
3. Technical and end-user training a must
4. Need for local support
5. Investment in good infrastructure a must- Datacenter, good network, scalable servers and steady clean power
6. Be aware of hidden costs
BENEFITS
Improved information access for planning and managing the institution;
Improved services for the faculty, students and employees;
Lower security risks;
Increased income and decreased expenses due to improved efficiency.