psc/fsi report for the month of june 2017 a) methodology...

PSC/FSI Report for the month of June 2017

A) Methodology used for report preparation and analysis

1. To assess the performance of various Flags, vessels, companies etc., three

performance indicators are used:

- Number of detentions

- Deficiency ratio= Total number of deficiencies

Total number of inspections of ship type/age/risk etc.

- Nil deficiency ratio= Total number of vessels inspected with nil deficiencies

Total number of inspections.

2. The performances and trends are evaluated for ship type inspected or size

(based on Gross Tonnage) or age grouping or belonging to a flag or

belonging to a risk type.

3. Following may be helpful while analyzing the report:

- A high“deficiency index” and a high “nil deficiency index”indicates that only

a few ships in the category being analyzed have high number of

deficiencies, increasing the deficiency index, while nil deficiency index

remains high.

- A low deficiency index and a low nil deficiency index may be an indicator

that the majority ofships inspected in the category being analyzed have few

non-compliances.

- A low deficiency index and high nil deficiency index is an indicator of well-

compliant ships in that category.

- A high deficiency index and low nil deficiency index is an indicator of non-

compliant ships across the category.

- Number of inspections may be taken into consideration while assessing

performance based on deficiency index and nil deficiency index. However,

it is also to be considered that Company with only few inspections (say 1 or

2) are unable to keep their few vessels compliant when these are plying in

foreign ports and may be inspected for PSC.

B) Port State Inspections in India by Indian Administration Surveyors

- The number of inspections have reduced from 57 in May 2017 to 27 in June

2017, that is, a reduction of about 52%. This is because majority of the

surveyors were away for training of 15 days duration.

- Kochi and Chennai district carried out maximum number of Port state

inspections with 8 and 7 respectively.

- There is a marginal reduction from about 77% to 70% of the high-risk

vessels being inspected.

- The increasing compliance with statutory requirements is demonstrated by

the figures of nil detentions in May and June 2017, and a continual trend of

reducing deficiency index and a nearly consistent nil deficiency index of

about 0.2.

- Performance of various risk categories: High risk ships with a reducing trend

of deficiency index from 3.5 in April to 2.7 in June 2017 and reducing nil

deficiency index from 0.4 in April to 0.22 in June is an indicator that though

number of non-compliances per inspected ship are reducing, there is also

an increase in non-compliance with statutory requirements for an

increasing number of inspected ships. The medium risk vessels with

reducing deficiency index from 4 in May to 3.5 in June 17 and increasing nil

deficiency index from 0.11 to 0.16 is an indicator of increasing compliance

in this risk category. In low risk category, the deficiency index has reduced

from 2 in May to 0.5 in June 17 and nil deficiency index has increased from

0 in May to 0.5 in June 17 indicating an overall improved performance.

- Performance in various age categories: Between May and June 2017, the

performance of vessels in the age category 5-15 years has come down with

increase in deficiency index from 2.1 to 2.8 and reduction in nil deficiency

index from 0.27 to 0.2. In other age categories, the ships have performed

better with either a reduction in deficiency or increase in nil deficiency

index or both.

- Performance of various types of vessels: Apart from Other Cargo vessels,

the performance of vessels in all other type categories have improved with

either a reduction in deficiency index or an increase in nil deficiency index

or both. However, the performance of other cargo vessels has marginally

dipped in June 17 when compared to May, with deficiency index increasing

from 4.1 to 4.2 and nil deficiency index reducing from 0.07 to 0.

- Performance of Recognized Organizations: Among all the Recognized

Organizations with 3 or more inspections, the performance of

DNV/GL/DNV-GL(AS) with a deficiency ratio of 1.9 and nil deficiency ratio of

0.28 was better than others.

- Performance of Flags: Among all the Flags with 3 or more inspections, the

performance of Singapore Flag with a deficiency index of 1.2 and nil

deficiency index of 0.2 was better than other Flags.

- Deficiency areas: The living conditions of seafarers continue to be an area

of concern with maximum number of deficiencies in this area.

C) Flag State Inspections of Indian Flag Vessels

- The decrease in number of Flag State Inspections is due to Flag State

Surveyors being involved in training.

- The number of vessels detained for non-compliances have remained the

same, that is, 3 each in May and June 2017. However, the detention rate

has gone up from 12% in May to 30% in June 2017 and is on a continual

rising trend since last 3-4 months. The detention index is also going up from

8.5 in April 8.8 in May to 11.5 in June 2017. With nil deficiency ratio of

almost zero, the above all indicates increasing non-compliance across the

Indian Flag vessels.

- Overall Performance: A rising deficiency index, almost zero nil deficiency

index and no reduction in number of detentions, provide enough evidence

of increasing non-compliances.

- Age based performance: The vessels between 15-25 years of age has

continuously demonstrated poor performance with rising deficiency index,

zero nil deficiency index and increasing number of detentions.

- Ship type based performance: Oil/Chemical/Gas tankers have performed

poorly in 2017 with consistent detentions and a high deficiency index.

However, a nil deficiency ratio of 0.2 in most of the months in 2017

indicates that there are fully compliant vessels in this type category. Other

cargo vessels continue to show poor performance with rising deficiency

index and almost zero nil deficiency index.

- Ship size based performance: The performance of vessels less than 3000 gt

continue to be a cause of concern with rising deficiency index and almost

zero nil deficiency index. In-spite of being small size, the number of non-

compliances are on a continually rising trend. Though, vessels above 3000gt

have higher number of detentions, the nil deficiency index is on a

decreasing trend.

- Performance of Recognized Organizations in June 17: Single Class IRS had 2

detentions in June, while there was one detention of vessel dual classed

with IRS & BV.

- The working condition of seafarers is a continual area of concern with high

number of deficiencies. With Propulsion & Machinery being another area

with large number of deficiencies, these all may be indicators towards

increased susceptibility of seafarers towards accidents.

D) Port State Inspections of Indian Flag Vessels abroad

- The average performance of Indian Flag vessels across PSC regimes is

reduced due to poor performance in TOKYO MOU. The Indian vessels were

inspected in 7 PSC regimes and had no deficiencies in 6 of these regimes.

- IRS-ABS dual class vessels had nil deficiencies in all the PSC inspections

conducted, while IRS-LR Class vessels had a deficiency index less than that

of the average Indian Flag deficiency index.

- Among Indian DOC holders, the performance of Bernhard-Schulte Ship

Managements was well below average Indian Flag performance, with only a

single PSC inspection and that too resulted in detention with 20

deficiencies.

- The performance of Indian vessels shows increasing susceptibility to high

number of deficiencies/detentions of vessels in the age bracket 15-25 years

with a high deficiency index and 1 detentions. Based on type, the Bulk

Carrier segment had a high number of deficiencies increasing the deficiency

index of Indian Flag and a detention.

- The major areas of concern with high number of detainable deficiencies

were noted to be water/weather-tightness of hull and Fire Safety

measures.

E) Corrective and Preventive action

- Following vessels were detained under FSI inspections in June 2017:

Name of

Vessel

IMO No. Age/Type Last

Annual

Survey

Managers

PFS

Supplier

9221176 45/OSV 15.12.2016 PFS

Shipping(India)

Ltd.

BON

ATLANTICO

9248203 16/OIL&

Chemical

Tanker

17.05.2016 Zen Shipping

& Ports Ltd.

Maharshi

Parshuram

9034547 15/Oil-

Tanker

04.01.2017 SCI Ltd.

-

- Following vessel detained under PSC in June 2017:

Name of

Vessel

IMO No. Place of

Detention

MOU Managers

AEGIS

FORTUNE

9222601 TIANJIN(China) TOKYO Bernhard

Schulte Ship

Management

Co. Ltd.

CLASS/RO Date of Last

Annual

Surveys

Last FSI date Age of

Vessel

Type of

Vessel

IRS 01.02.2017 16 Bulk Carrier

- The Directorate has been implementing corrective and preventive action

for Indian Flag vessels detained under Port State or Flag State Intervention

inspections.

- Following corrective and preventive measures are being implemented on

vessels detained under FSI.

Name of Vessel Corrective & Preventive Action

PFS Supplier The Company was asked to take following immediate action:

1. Appointment of DPA.

2. DPA to report to DGS

3. Payment of Crew salary.

4. Manning of all vessels as per Safe Manning

BON ATLANTICO 1. Additional FSI within a month

2. Additional Safety(DOC) audit within a month after FSI.

Maharshi

Parashuram

Company to offer for FSI prior carrying out commercial operations.

Aegis Fortune 1. Additional General Examination.

2. Additional SMC Audit

F) Review of Merchant Shipping Notice 4 of 2017

i) Vessels not complying with regards to FSI inspection within 1-3

months after Annual/Intermediate/Renewal Surveys: The frequency

of FSI inspection of Vessel MT. Hari-Sagar is increased from 1 to 2

between Annual surveys as per Clause F(1) of the MS Notice 4 of

2017 for conducting last FSI inspection after 1-3 months of last

Annual survey and after issuance of the said MS Notice.

ii) Grant of exemption from FSI for vessels having conducted

satisfactory PSC in countries under PARIS MOU & certain countries

under TOKYO MOU:Vessel Bon Atlantico, an Oil tanker was detained

on 05 June 2017 under FSI inspection. It is noted that the vesselPSC

inspection was conducted at Constanta under Paris MOU on

08.07.2016(less than a year ago) with nil deficiencies. The vessel was

also inspected at Bandar Khomeni under IOMOU on 08.10.2016 with

3 deficiencies. It is worth noting here that vessels who have

demonstrated good performance in Paris MOU are granted

exemption from FSI as per MS Notice 4 of 2017.

Graphical representation of the performance of Foreign Flag Vessels in

the Port State Control in India

44 44 4439

57

27

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Number of PSC inspections: Trend Jan-June 2017

6

1312

810

4

02468

101214

Kolkata: Number of PSC inspections: Trend Jan-June

2017

10 10 97

15

5

0

5

10

15

20

Mumbai: Number of PSC inspections: Trend Jan-June

2017

13

912

4

107

0

5

10

15

Chennai: Number of PSC inspections: Trend Jan-June

2017

Figure 1: Trends in number of PSC inspections

Figure 2: IOMOU Risk based Trends (Percentage of Total inspections)

Figure 3: Trends in detentions (number & percentage of total inspections)

15 12 1115

19

8

0

10

20

Kochi: Number of PSC inspections: Trend Jan-June

2017

0 0 0

54

3

0123456

Kandla: Number of PSC inspections: Jan-June 2017

18,2

45,5

68,174,3 77,2

70,3

38,6

22,7

20,5

10,3

15,822,2

43,2

31,8

11,4

15,4

77,4

0

20

40

60

80

100

January February March April May June

Risk based: Percenatge of total inspections: Trends Jan-June 2017

PSC inspection: % age High Risk PSC inspectiosn: %age Medium Risk

PSC inspections: %age Low Risk

4

1

3 3

0 00

1

2

3

4

5

Number of detentions: Trends Jan-June 2017

9,10%

2,30%

6,80%7,70%

0,00% 0,00%0,00%

2,00%

4,00%

6,00%

8,00%

10,00%

Percentage of detentions: Trends Jan-June 2017

Figure 4: Performance trend based on nil deficiency index and deficiency index

Figure 5: Performance trend of IOMOU High & Medium Risk Category Vessels

4,2

3,5 3,73,2

2,9 2,7

00,5

11,5

22,5

33,5

44,5

Performance trend:Average deficiency per vessel: Jan-June 2017

108

15

8

13

6

0,23 0,18 0,34 0,21 0,23 0,22

0

5

10

15

20

Performance trends: Number of vessels with Nil

deficiencies

Number of vessels with Nil deficiencies

Nil Deficiency Index

10,1

2,854 3,5

2,7 2,7

0 0,30,3 0,4

0,25 0,220

2

4

6

8

10

12

Performance trend High Risk Vessels: Jan- June 2017

Deficiency Ratio Nil deficiency ratio

3,13,5 3,4

2,8

43,5

0,17 0,06 0 0 0,11 0,16

0

1

2

3

4

5

Performance trend Medium Risk Vessels: Jan-

June 2017


Figure 6: Performance trend of IOMOU Low risk category vessels

Figure 7: Trends in performance of vessels between 0-5 years of age

1,9

2,6

3,2

2

1,4

0,50,370

0,40

0,250,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5


Performance trend Low Risk Vessel: Jan-June 2017


2

0,4

1,4

0,7

1,1

0

0,5

0,80,6

0,7

0,4

1

00

0 0 0 00

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5


Performance trend of vessels 0-5 Years Age: Jan-June 2017

Deficiency Ratio Nil deficiency ratio Number of detentions

Figure 8: Trends in performance of vessels between 5-15 years of age

Figure 9: Trends in performance of vessels between 15-25 years of age.

3,4

2,72,9

2,6

2,1

2,8

0,10,13

0,25 0,12 0,27 0,2

1

0 0

1

0 0

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4


Performance trend of vessels between 5-15 Years of age: Jan-June 2017


3,9

5,1 5,3

4,34,9

3,8

0,14 0 0,16 0,14 0 0

1 1 1 1

0 0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6


Performance trend of vessels between 15-25 Years of age: Jan-June 2017


Figure 10: Trends of performance of vessels above 25 years of age.

Figure 11: Trends in performance of Bulk Carriers

16

129,6

24

15,5

0 0 0 0 01 02

10

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

January February March April May

Performance trend of vessels above 25 years of age: Jan-June 2017


3,5

2,93,1

2,8 2,7

2,1

0,22 0,18 0,220,04 0,11

0,3

1 1 1 1

0

00

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4


Performance trend: Bulk Carriers: Jan-June 2017


Figure 12: Trends in performance of Oil and/or Chemical Tankers

Figure 13: Trends in performance of Gas Carriers

5,2

2,3

4,4

3,1

4,5

3,3

0,11 0,33

0,44 0,6

0,450,14

2

0

1 1

0 00

1

2

3

4

5

6


Performance Trend: Oil Tankers and/or Chemical Tankers: Jan-June 2017



Deficiency Ratio 0 0 0 0,5 0,8 0

Nil deficiency ratio 1 0 0 0,5 0,67 1

Number of detentions 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

0,5

0,8

0

1

0 0

0,50,67

1

0 00

0 0 0

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1,2

Performance Trend: Gas Carriers: Jan-June 2017


Figure 14: Trends in performance of Other Cargo Vessels

Name of

Recognized

Organization

Number of

Inspections

Number of

Detentions

Deficiency Ratio Nil Deficiency

Ratio

ABS 5 0 3 0.2

BV 2 0 5 0

CCS 1 0 4 0

DNV/GL/DNV-

GL(AS)

7 0 1.9 0.28

LR 1 0 0 1

NK 8 0 2.9 0.12

RINA 1 0 2 0

VR 1 0 4 0

Table 1: Performances of various Recognized Organizations in June 2017

3,94,4

6,56,2

4,1 4,2

0,3 0 0,16 00,07

0

1

0

1 1

00

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


Performance Trend: Other Cargo Vessels: Jan-June 2017


Flag Number of

Inspections

Number of

Detentions

Deficiency Ratio Nil Deficiency

Ratio

Belgium 1 0 0 1

Cayman Island 1 0 8 0

People Republic

of China

1 0 4 0

Ethopia 1 0 3 0

Hong Kong 3 0 2 0

Liberia 3 0 3.7 0

Malta 1 0 2.3 0.33

Marshall Island 3 0 1 0.67

Norway 1 0 0 1

Panama 3 0 5.3 0

Singapore 6 0 1.2 0.2

Vietnam 1 0 4 0

Table 2: Performances of various Foreign Flags in June 2017

Deficiency Head Number of

Deficiencies

Safety of Navigation 5

Life Saving Appliances 5

Propulsion and Auxiliary Machineries 6

Pollution Prevention: MARPOL Annex IV 2

Pollution Prevention: MARPOL Annex V 2

ISPS 2

Labor Conditions: Condition of Employment 1

Labor Conditions: Accommodation, recreational facilities, Food & Catering 1

LaborConditions: Health protection, medical care, welfare and social security 1

Certificates & Documentation: Ship Certificates 2

Certificates & Documentation: Crew Certificates 1

Certificates & Documentation: Documents 9

Structural Conditions 1

Water/Weathertight Conditions 6

Emergency Systems 1

Radio Communications 1

Cargo operations including equipment’s 2

Fire Safety 5

Alarms 2

Working and Living Conditions: Living Conditions 3

Working and Living Conditions: Working Conditions 13

Table 3: Distribution of deficiencies identified during various PSC inspections in June

2017

Graphical representation of the performance of Indian Flag Vessels in the

Flag State Control inspections

Figure 15: Trends in number of FSI inspections: Jan-June 2017

23 23

34 3225

10

0

10

20

30

40

Jan Feb March April May June

Number of FSI inspections: Jan- June 17

86

8

13

4 3

0

5

10

15


Mumbai: Number of FSI inspections Jan-June 2017

7

2

86

9

2

0

5

10


Kolkata: Number of FSI inspections: Trend Jan-

June 17

3 3

6 67

00

2

4

6

8


Chennai: Number of FSI inspections: Trends Jan-June

2017

0

2

4

1

4

3

0

1

2

3

4

5


Kochi: Number of FSI inspections: Trends Jan-

June 2017

4

98

6

12

0

2

4

6

8

10


Kandla: Number of FSI inspections: Trends: Jan-

June 2017

Figure 16: Trends in detention rate

Figure 17: Performance parameter trends for FSI: Jan-June 2017

JAN FEB MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE

Detention% 0% 4,30% 3,00% 6,20% 12% 30%

0%

4,30% 3,00%6,20%

12%

30%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Trend in Detention rate: Jan-June 2017


Number of Detentions 0 1 1 2 3 3

Deficiency Index 5,7 5,6 7,2 8,5 8,8 11,5

Nil Deficiency Index 0,13 0,02 0 0,06 0,04 0

01 1

23 3

5,7 5,6

7,2

8,5 8,8

11,5

0,130,02 0

0,060,04 0

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Performance Trend: January-June 2017

Number of Detentions Deficiency Index Nil Deficiency Index

Figure 18: Trends in 0-5 years of age vessels in FSI: Jan-June 2017

Note: If all the performance parameters, that is, deficiency index, nil deficiency index and number of

detentions are zero, that means no vessels in this age category was inspected during the month




JAN February March April May June


Deficiency Index 0 0 3 6,3 6 0

Nil deficiency Index 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0

3

6,3 6

0

01234567

Performance Trend: 0-5 Years of age vessels : Jan-June 2017

Number of detentions Deficiency Index Nil deficiency Index



Deficiency Index 4 4,4 7,7 11,3 7,5 10

Nil deficiency Index 0 0 0 0,28 0 0

0 0 0

21

0

4 4,4

7,7

11,3

7,5

10

0 0 00,28 0 0

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Performance Trend: 5-15 Years of age vessels: Jan-June 2017





Figure 21: Trends in >25 years of age vessels in FSI: Jan-June 2017






Nil deficiency Index 0,2 0,11 0,14 0 0,33 0

0 01

0

1 3

4,8

7,4

9,3

6,2

9,3

12,2

0,20,11

0,14 0 0,33 0

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Performance trend: 15-25 Years of age vessels: Jan-June 2017




Deficiency Index 5,3 5,5 6,1 10,7 13,7 11

Nil deficiency Index 0,25 0 0 0 0 0

01

0 0 0 0

5,3 5,5 6,1

10,7

13,7

11

0,25 0 0 0 0 0

02468

10121416

Performance trend: > 25 years of age vessels: Jan-June 2017


Figure 22: Performance Trends of Bulk Carriers in FSI: Jan-June 2017


detentions are zero, that means no vessels in this type category was inspected during the month

Figure 23: Performance Trends of Oil tanker/Chemical Tanker/Gas Carriers in FSI: Jan-

June 2017



Deficiency Index 6 8,75 4 4 7,2 0

Nil deficiency Index 0 0 0 0,25 0 0

0 0 0 01

0

6

8,75

4 4

7,2

0

0 0 0 0,25 0 0

0123456789

10

Preformance trend: Bulk Carriers: Jan-June 2017





Nil deficiency Index 0,33 0,25 0 0,2 0,2 0

0 01

0 02

5,53,5

11,8

9,210,6

9,4

0,33 0,25 0 0,2 0,2 0

02468

101214

Performance trend: Oil Tanker/Chemical Tanker/Gas Carriers: Jan-June 2017


Figure 24: Performance Trends of Other Cargo Vessels in FSI: Jan-June 2017

Figure 25: Performance Trends of Passenger Vessels in FSI: Jan-June 2017


detentions are zero, that means no vessels in this type category was inspected during the month



Deficiency Index 4 5,7 6,7 9,1 10,3 13,6

Nil deficiency Index 0 0 0,04 0 0 0

01

02

1 1

45,7

6,7

9,110,3

13,6

0 0 0,04 0 0 0

02468

10121416

Performance trend: Other Cargo Vessels: Jan-June 2017


JANFebruary

March

April May June


Deficiency Index 0 0 13 9 13 0

Nil deficiency Index 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0

13

9

13

00

0

0 0 00

02468

101214

Performance trend: Passenger Ships: Jan-June 2017


Figure 26: Performance Trends of 0-500 gt Vessels in FSI: Jan-June 2017

Figure 27: Performance Trends of 500-3000 gt Vessels in FSI: Jan-June 2017



Deficiency Index 8,5 4,1 5,3 5,2 7 13,7

Nil deficiency Index 0 0 0,11 0 0 0

0 0 01 1

0

8,5

4,15,3 5,2

7

13,7

0 0 0,11 0 0 0

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Performance trend:0-500 gt vessels: Jan-June 2017




Deficiency Index 3 6,6 8,3 8,5 8,5 13,5

Nil deficiency Index 0,25 0 0 0 0 0

01

0 0 01

3

6,68,3 8,5 8,5

13,5

0,25 0 0 0 0 002468

10121416

Performance trend: 500-3000 gt vessels: Jan-June 2017


Figure 28: Performance Trends of > 3000 gt Vessels in FSI: Jan-June 2017

Figure 29: Performances of various Recognized Organizations in June 2017




Nil deficiency Index 0,15 0,14 0 0,13 0,06 0

0 01 1

2 2

5,5

7,18,1

10,69,4 9,4

0,150,14 0

0,13

0,060

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Performance trend: >3000 gt vessels: Jan-June 2017


Single IRS IRS-ABS IRS-BV IRS-KR IRS-LR

Number of Inspections 6 1 1 1 1

Number of Detentions 2 0 1 0 0

Number of detentions within 3-months of survey

0 0 0 0 0

6

1 1 1 1

2

0

1

0 00 0 0 0 00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Performance of Recognized Organizations in June 2017

Number of Inspections

Number of Detentions

Number of detentions within 3-months of survey

Figure 30: The detainable areas in June 2017

Figure 31: The detainable areas in June 2017

WorkingConditio

ns

Safety ofNavigatio

n

Propulsion &

AuxiliaryMachinar

ies

RadioCommunications

CrewCertificat

es

FireSafety

LivingConditio

ns

Total number of deficiencies 26 15 9 8 7 7 7

Number of detainabledeficiencies

2 2 3 1 1 1 1

26

15

9 8 7 7 7

2 2 31 1 1 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Areas of Concern with 5 or more deficiencies

Total number of deficiencies Number of detainable deficiencies

EmergencySystems

ShipCertificates

DangerousGoods

MARPOLAnnex 1

MARPOLANNEX IV

Number of detainabledeficiencies

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

Other areas with detainable deficiencies in

Graphical representation of the performance of Indian Flag Vessels in the

Port State Control inspections

Figure 32: Average Indian Flag Performance (All inspections & in each PSC regime)

Figure 33: Performance of Recognized Organizations: June 2017

ALLMOU

TOKYOBlackSea

Medittarean

Paris RIYADH USCGVina-

Del-Mer

Total number of Inspections 14 5 2 1 1 2 1 2

Number of detentions 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Deficiency Index 2,4 5,6 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nil deficeincy Index 0,57 0,2 1 1 1 1 1 1

14

5

21 1

21

21 1

0 0 0 0 0 0

2,4

5,6

0 0 0 0 0 00,57 0,21 1 1 1 1 1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Indian Flag Performance: June 2017

Total number of Inspections Number of detentions Deficiency Index Nil deficeincy Index

Single IRS IRS-ABS IRS-LR

Total number of Inspections 8 4 2

Number of detentions 1 0 0

Deficiency Index 3,6 0 2

Nil deficeincy Index 0,5 1 0

8

4

21

0 0

3,6

0

2

0,5 10

0123456789

Performance of Recognized Organizations: June 2017

Total number of Inspections Number of detentions

Deficiency Index Nil deficeincy Index

Name of

Company

Type of Ships

inspected/Number of

ships inspected

Number of

detentions

Deficiency

Index

Nil

Deficiency

Index

AZA Shipping Oil tanker/1 0 2 0

Bernhard

Schulte

Bulk Carrier/1 1 20 0

Five Star Bulk Carrier/2 0 0 1

GESCO Bulk Carrier/3 & Oil

Tanker/2

0 0.6 0.6

SAI Shipping Other Cargo Vessel/1 0 0 1

Shipping

Corporation

Oil tanker/1 & Bulk

Carrier/1

0 4 0

Tolani Bulk Carrier/2 0 0 1

Table 4: Performance of Indian Flag DOC Holders

Figure 34: Age based performance of Indian Flag Vessels: June 2017

5-15 Years 15-25 Years

Total number of Inspections 9 5

Number of detentions 0 1

Deficiency Index 1,2 4,4

Nil deficeincy Index 0,56 0,6

9

5

011,2

4,4

0,56 0,6

0

2

4

6

8

10

Age based performance: June 2017

Total number of Inspections Number of detentions

Deficiency Index Nil deficeincy Index

Figure 35: Performance based on Ship type: June 2017

Figure 36: Areas with detainable deficiencies: June 2017

BULK CARRIER OIL TANKEROTHER CARGO

VESSELS

Total number of Inspections 9 4 1

Number of detentions 1 0 0

Deficiency Index 2,9 1,75 0

Nil deficeincy Index 0,55 0,5 1

9

4

110 0

2,91,75

00,55 0,5

1

0123456789

10

Performance based on Ship Type: June 2017

Total number of Inspections Number of detentions Deficiency Index Nil deficeincy Index

5

9

1

43

1 1

4

21 1 1 1 1

0123456789

10

Area with detainable deficiencies: June 2017

Total number of deficiencies Number of detainable deficiencies

Areas of concern Total Number of deficiencies

MARPOL Annex I 2

MARPOL Annex IV 1

Living Conditions of Seafarers 1

Accommodation & recreational facilities

for seafarers

2

Structural Conditions 2

Table 5: Other areas with deficiencies

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Prepared by: Shri Vikrant Rai, Engineer & Ship Surveyor

Approved by: Shri B.R.Sekhar, Chief Surveyor

Surveyour List For the Year 2017

Sr. No.

Name MMD

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June TOTAL

FSI PSC FSI PSC FSI PSC FSI PSC FSI PSC

FSI PSC FSI PSC

1 Shri P C Majhi,

E&SS Kandla 3 0 9 0 8 0 2 2 2 2 1 0 25 4

2 Capt. S.K.Shukla,

NS Kandla 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

3 Shri Jaisinghani,

SS Kandla NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

4 Capt A K Patel, NS Kandla 0 NA 1 NA 1 NA 4 0 0 0 1 0 7 0

5 Capt R Sagar, NS Kolkata 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA 1 NA 0 NA 1 0

6 Shri K M Rao,

E&SS Kolkata 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA 2 NA 2 NA 0 NA 4 1

7 Shri Sujit K Das, E&SS

Kolkata 0 2 1 2 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 1 1 17

8 Shri S S Murty, E&SS

Vizag 0 1 1 2 1 2 3 0 4 3 0 3 9 11

9 Capt N Mukesh,

NS Mumbai NA NA NA NA 2 NA 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA 2 0

10 Shri A K Sinha ,

E&SS Port Blair 3 NA 0 NA 2 NA 3 NA 3 NA 0 NA 11 0

11 Shri U Rehman, E&SS

Kolkata 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 5

12 Shri A Chaki,

E&SS Haldia 4 NA 1 7 2 6 1 5 2 6 1 2 11 26

13 Shri R R

Subbarao, E&SS Paradip NA NA NA NA 1 NA 0 NA 3 NA 0 NA 4 0

14 Shri J

Mukhopadhya, E&SS

Mumbai 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 7

15 Capt S K Das , Dy

NA Chennai 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 2

16 Shri A K

Choudhary, E&SS Chennai 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 0 1 3 8

17 Shri J

Senthilkumar, E&SS

Mumbai 1 7 0 5 0 6 1 0 1 3 1 1 4 22

18 Shri Gopikrishna

C, E&SS Tuticorin 0 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 5 0 2 6 14

19 Capt M K Behl,NS DGS NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

20 Capt T Ghosh,NS Chennai NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

21 Shri S S Gadkar, Dy CS (I/C)

Delhi 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

22 Capt S I Abul Kalam Azad, N S

Mumbai 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 3 1 1 1 13

23 Shri S Oraon,

E&SS Jamnagar 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 4 1 3 6 9

24 Capt D J Joseph,NS

DGS NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

25 Capt A Joseph ,NS DGS NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

26 Shri S Kumar , E&SS

Chennai 5 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 9 4

27 Shri S K

Shrivastava ,E&SS Mumbai 1 1 3 1 4 0 6 0 1 2 0 0 15 4

28 Shri N Oommen, Ship surveyour

Mumbai NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

29 Capt V S Manhas ,

NS Mumbai NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

30 Shri Anapu Srinvas

Parsad Mumbai NA NA NA NA 4 NA 2 NA 0 NA 0 NA 6 0

31 Capt R Poswal, NS Delhi NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

32 Shri G L Meena ,

E&SS Delhi NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

33 Capt K R

Sundaram, NS Delhi NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

34 Shri B Mohapatra,

R I Mumbai NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

35 Shri V R

Padukone, R I Mumbai NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

36 Shri B Raj , E&SS Goa 2 6 2 5 0 7 0 4 0 5 0 2 4 29

37 Shri Gopi Nandan

Papineni E&SS DGS


38 Shri A Wankhede, E&SS


39 Shri S Kamath,

E&SS DGS NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

40 Shri Vikrant Rai, E&SS


41 Shri L Natrajan Kochi 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8

42 Capt S K Nair, NS Kochi NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

43 Shri P Nair, E&SS Kochi 0 NA 0 NA 1 NA 1 NA 0 NA 0 NA 2 0

44 Shri Kiran C S , E&SS

Kochi 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 6 1 0 1 18

45 Shri V V Paul, E&SS

New Manglore

0 9 1 8 3 5 0 11 4 13 2 8 10 54

46 Capt. P. C. Meena, NS


Total 22 44 24 44 36 44 33 39 29 57 10 26