ps20150202 - feasibility study for glen pump station

Associated Engineering (B.C.) Ltd.

PS20150202 - Feasibility Study for Glen Pump

Station AbandonmentPreliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Site Characterization

Submitted by:LEVELTON CONSULTANTS LTD.

September 04, 2015Levelton File # R615-0685-01

LEVELTON CONSULTANTS LTD.Unit 150, 12791 Clarke Place

Richmond, BC V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042

September 04, 2015

Levelton File #R615-0685-01

Associated Engineering (B.C.) Ltd.

Suite 300, 4940 Canada Way

Burnaby, B.C. V5G 4M5

Attention: Mr. Lewis Macrae, P.Eng. – Manager, Energy and Infrastructure

Project: PS20150202 - Feasibility Study for Glen Pump Station Abandonment

Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Site Characterization

Levelton Consultants Ltd. (Levelton) is pleased to provide our report on the Preliminary Geotechnical and

Environmental Site Characterization for use in the feasibility study of the potential abandonment of the Glen Pump

Station located in the City of Vancouver. Two copies of the report are enclosed. If you have any questions

pertaining to the report, please contact the undersigned at 604-278-1411.

Yours truly,

Levelton Consultants Ltd.

Original Signed by

Per: Jay Rao, P.Eng.

Senior Environmental Engineer

Levelton File # R615-0685-01September 04, 2015

Associated Engineering (B.C.) Ltd.PS20150202 - Feasibility Study for Glen Pump Station

AbandonmentPreliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Site

CharacterizationPage | i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................. 1

2 Project and Site Description ......................................................................................................................... 1

3 Findings of Previous Desktop Review ........................................................................................................... 2

3.1 Geotechnical Considerations from Desktop Review .............................................................................. 2

3.2 Environmental Consideration ............................................................................................................... 2

4 site investigation.......................................................................................................................................... 4

4.1 Exploration and Laboratory Testing Program........................................................................................ 4

4.1.1 Geological Characterization .......................................................................................................... 5

4.1.2 Environmental Characterization.................................................................................................... 6

5 Discussion and Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 7

5.1 General ................................................................................................................................................ 7

5.2 Environmental Permitting Considerations ............................................................................................ 8

5.3 Design Considerations .......................................................................................................................... 8

5.3.1 Sewer Alignment .......................................................................................................................... 8

5.3.2 Seismic Design Considerations ...................................................................................................... 9

5.3.3 Pump Station .............................................................................................................................. 10

5.3.4 Long-Term Pipe Settlement ........................................................................................................ 10

5.3.5 Pavement Restoration ................................................................................................................ 10

5.4 Construction Considerations............................................................................................................... 10

5.4.1 Construction Trench Worker Exposure........................................................................................ 10

5.4.2 Excavated Soil Management ....................................................................................................... 11

5.4.3 Temporary Trench and Excavation Support................................................................................. 11

5.4.4 Construction Dewatering ............................................................................................................ 12

5.4.5 Pipe Bedding and Trench Backfill ................................................................................................ 12

5.5 Additional Environmental and Geotechnical Investigation .................................................................. 13

6 Closure....................................................................................................................................................... 14

List of Tables

Table A: Summary of Site Information ................................................................................................................. 2Table B: Analytical Plan for Soil Samples collected during the Surface Investigations…………………………………………...4

Table C: Groundwater Parameter at each Monitoring Well Location just before Groundwater Sampling……………..5

Table D: Analytical Plan for Groundwater Samples collected during the Sub-Surface Investigations……………………..5




CharacterizationPage | ii

List of Appendices

Appendix A - Figures

Appendix B - Photographs

Appendix C – Borehole Logs

Appendix D – Analytical Result Tables

Appendix E – Chain of Custody Forms

Appendix F – Laboratory Certificates

Appendix G – Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Sewer Use Bylaw No. 299, 2007 (Consolidated)

Appendix H – Standard Limitations

© 2015 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

THIS DOCUMENT IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER, OR FOR ANY PURPOSE, EXCEPT BY

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF LEVELTON CONSULTANTS LTD.




CharacterizationPage | 1

1 INTRODUCTION

Levelton Consultants Ltd. (Levelton) was retained by Associated Engineering (B.C.) Ltd. (AE) to conduct screening

level geotechnical and environmental subsurface investigations as part of a broader Feasibility Study for the

potential Glen Pump Station Abandonment. The revised scope of services for this work, Phase 2 (Preliminary

Subsurface Characterization) was provided in Levelton’s proposal (P715-0653-00) dated 10 July 2015.

The feasibility study was commissioned by the City of Vancouver to assess the potential abandonment of Glen

Pump Station, located on the east side of China Creek North Park in the City of Vancouver (the City). If the

abandonment of this pump station proceeds, wastewater flow that is currently directed to the pump station would

be re-directed to the City’s Terminal Pump Station (located at the southeast corner of Terminal Avenue and St.

George St). The re-direction would involve the construction of a new sanitary sewer line primarily along Great

Northern Way. The City is also considering the construction of a new larger pump station to replace the existing

Glen Pump Station, if the option of re-directing wastewater flow along Great Northern Way is not selected.

In May 2015, Levelton presented a geotechnical-environmental desktop study report for the project. The study

identified potentially adverse conditions related to historical mass filling in the area and recommended that

further subsurface work be undertaken to verify conditions. This report, along with the attached figures and

appendices, provides a summary of geotechnical and environmental findings following the completion of a

screening level subsurface investigation along the proposed sewer alignment. Discussion is provided on potential

geotechnical and environmental considerations, based on the findings of the subsurface investigations. Also

provided is preliminary discussion on potential design considerations for construction of a new pump station to

replace the existing Glen Pump Station.

2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION

We understand from Associated Engineering (BC) Ltd., (AEL) that the proposed sanitary sewer alignment would

be a 500 mm diameter PVC sewer pipe extending from the existing Glen Pump Station, located to the northwest

of Glen Drive and East 7th Avenue, to the intersection of Great Northern Way and Glen Drive. From the intersection

of Great Northern Way and Glen Drive, the sanitary sewer would extend westward along the southern portion of

Great Northern Way for approximately 750 metres. The proposed sewer pipe would connect to the existing

sanitary sewer alignment along the Right-of-Way through 525 Great Northern Way. Figure 1 in Appendix A

illustrates the proposed sewer alignment.

We understand from AEL that the geodetic invert elevations of the proposed sewer line is 2.4 m at the Glen Pump

Station, and 1.4 m geodetic elevation at the west alignment terminus. Additionally, the sewer pipe will have an

approximate 0.11% slope. Therefore, we estimate that the approximate depth of the pipe invert will be in the

order of 2.5 m at the west end of the alignment and 3.5 m near Glen Pump Station. Information summarized in

Table A is used to describe the Site.





For the option of constructing a new pump station, we understand that this new facility would be located near

the existing Glen Pump Station on Glen Drive.

Table A: Summary of Site Information

Description Great Northern Way Alignment

Longitude / Latitude1 N 49° 15’ 58.33”, W 123° 05’ 11.94”

At the time of our site visits during our desktop review and subsurface investigation, it was noted that theproperties to the north of Great Northern Way were occupied by commercial buildings and parking lots. A vacantproperty was observed at the northwestern portion of the proposed sewer alignment. Residential properties andChina Creek North Park were observed along the southern portion of the alignment. China Creek North Park andthe Vancouver Community College campus were located on the west and east sides of Glen Drive, respectively. Aproperty located to the northeast of the site was occupied by Shaw Communications Inc.

3 FINDINGS OF PREVIOUS DESKTOP REVIEW

As indicated, Levelton had previously conducted a geotechnical and environmental desktop review for theproposed sanitary sewer alignment dated May 01, 2015. The available information gathered during the desktopreview indicated that Great Northern Way was located towards the southern boundary of a historical coastal inlet(False Creek inlet) and that was infilled and reclaimed in the early part of the 1900’s. Accordingly, there waspotential for the proposed sewer alignment to be located in an area of thick random bulk fill. Available geologicalmapping indicated that underlying the fill within the historical inlet were geologically recent marine deposits.Mapping and previous assessments completed by Levelton indicated that firm ground (including sedimentarybedrock) was present in areas to the south of the former inlet.

The following subsections were extracted from Levelton’s desktop review report for the purpose of summarizingthe findings of that report.

3.1 GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS FROM DESKTOP REVIEW

From a geotechnical perspective, the desktop review indicated that a portion of the proposed sewer alignmentlocated at or near the northwest end (approximately 200 m lineal metre) may encounter little to no bulk fill withtill and bedrock at shallow depths, depending on the location of the alignment off of Great Northern Way. Giventhe variability in ground conditions, further subsurface characterization was recommended to reduceuncertainties related to pipe support and long term performance, as well as potential construction installationchallenges.

3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

Our review of the land use within and at surrounding properties along the alignment indicated an elevatedpotential for soil or groundwater contamination issues due to the historical activities and land uses in the area ofthe alignment. Further soil and groundwater characterization was required to determine the extent of potential

1 Acquired from Google EarthTM for approximate centre of the proposed alignment at the intersection of Great Northern Way andFoley Street, Vancouver





issues. However, in the event that displaced soil and/or if infiltrating groundwater needs to be managed duringconstruction activities, the requirements of the applicable City of Vancouver Bylaws, BC EnvironmentalManagement Act, BC Contaminated Sites Regulation and the BC Hazardous Waste Regulation would apply. Soildisplaced during the excavation activities can be taken to a receiving property (non-agricultural lands) offsite onlyif the concentrations of the potential contaminants of concern (PCOCs) meet the applicable CSR Schedule 7Relocation Standards to Non-Agricultural Lands. There are potential cost and scheduling implications related tothis requirement that require careful planning.

The extent and requirements of groundwater management will depend on the depth of the trench relative to thegroundwater table, neither of which are confirmed at this time. There are cost and scheduling considerationsrelated to groundwater management that require careful planning. It is noted that there are regulated parametersoutlined in the City of Vancouver Sewer Discharge Bylaw and that it may be necessary to pump and treatgroundwater prior to disposal. Costs pertaining to soil transport, disposal and groundwater pump, treat anddischarge (including design and permitting) would form part of the further characterization and planning relatedto the environmental aspects of the proposed installation.

Trench worker exposure to the presence of contaminants in soil or infiltrating groundwater should be evaluatedas part of the further characterization.

A review of published and in-house information indicates that the site is located within an area that washistorically in-filled circa 1914. The source and the quality of the fill material was unknown and representedsignificant geotechnical and environmental uncertainty with respect to design, construction and cost premiums.In addition to the historical wide area filling, Levelton identified a number of environmentally registered propertiesadjacent alignment that were used for commercial and industrial purposes that raise potential concern withrespect to water quality. It was recommended that further subsurface investigation and characterization becompleted in support of the civil design and the necessary assessment of environmental soil and groundwaterquality. The desktop review had identified potential issues of soil and groundwater quality that elevate the needto develop a framework for soil and groundwater management plans for the works as well as trench worker safety.The extent of further characterization and the use of a single or phased methodology would depend on furtherdiscussions with AE and the City. The depth of the trenching, the actual alignment, proximity to existingstructure/utilities, performance criteria for settlement and seismic resilience and other design variables would allneed to be considered in developing the work program.

It was recommended that the soil and groundwater within the proposed alignment be characterized in generalaccordance with BC Ministry of Environment’s Technical Guidance Document #1. Soil characterization woulddetermine the presence or absence of any PCOCs identified for the site. The identified PCOCs for the site weremetals, light and heavy extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (LEPH/HEPH) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs). Select soil samples were to be analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for screening purposes. Ifthe PCOC concentrations in soil meet the applicable CSR Schedule 7 Relocation Standards to Non-AgriculturalLands, the displaced soils can be disposed of at a receiving facility which can be arranged by the contractor.However, if the concentrations exceed the applicable CSR Schedule 7 Relocation Standards (to non-agriculturallands), it will be necessary to review options for the disposal of soil at a permitted facility. Additionally, if soil wasfound with debris, such soil would have to relocated to a permitted disposal facility.





4 SITE INVESTIGATION

The drilling program, laboratory testing and subsurface conditions observed during the site investigation arediscussed in the following sections.

4.1 EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM

The subsurface investigation included a total of four (4) boreholes that were advanced at accessible locationsalong the southern alignment of Great Northern Way and on Glen Drive on 5 August 2015. The boreholes weredrilled with a truck mounted drill rig equipped with solid stem augers provided by Downrite Drilling Ltd. ofChilliwack, BC. Boreholes 15-MW2 and 15-MW4 were advanced to approximately 9.1m below existing grade,while boreholes 15-MW1 and 15-BH3 were advanced to approximately 7.6m and 3.1m below existing grade,respectively. In each case, the boreholes were terminated in inferred firm ground.

The borehole locations are presented in Figure 2 of Appendix A. Detailed soil and groundwater analytical resultsare presented in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively. Photographs captured during the subsurface investigationsare attached in Appendix B. Borehole logs prepared for both geotechnical and environmental observations areincluded in Appendix C.

Based on the encountered soil stratigraphy, soil samples were collected from the auger flights during theinvestigation for geotechnical laboratory classification and moisture content determination, as well as forenvironmental laboratory analysis.

The soil samples collected by Levelton’s environmental field staff were field screened with a photoionizationdetector (PID). The PID readings for each of the bagged soil samples were recorded in the field. The analytical planand the rationale for selecting soil samples that were submitted for analysis are summarized in Table B.

Table B: Analytical Plan for Soil Samples collected during the Surface Investigations

Location Analysis Number of Samples Rationale

15-MW1 Metals 2Soil samples collected from 1m and 1.8m below grade weresubmitted to characterize the environmental quality of the fillmaterial near the Glen Pump Station.

15-MW2LEPH/HEPH/PAHs

VOCs/VPHsMetals

112

Soil samples collected from 2.4m and 3.6m below grade weresubmitted to characterize the environmental quality of the soilencountered at this borehole location. The soil sample collectedat 2.4m below grade was additionally submitted forLEPH/HEPH/PAH and VOCs/VPH analysis to confirm ifpetroleum hydrocarbons are present in the fill layer identifiedbetween 0.45m and 3.1m below grade.

15-BH3 Metals 2Soil samples collected from 1.2m and 2.1m below grade weresubmitted to characterize the environmental quality of the soilat this borehole location.

15-MW4 Metals 2Soil samples collected from 0.6m and 2.1m below grade weresubmitted to characterize the environmental quality of the soilat this borehole location.

Well development and groundwater sampling were conducted following the installations of the monitoring wells.Well development was conducted at each well location with a dedicated bailer to remove fine-grained particles





and static groundwater conditions were observed within the monitoring well following installation. The purgedwater from each well location appeared to be silty.

Monitoring wells were purged and sampled after at least 24 hours following well development. The fieldinformation pertinent to the groundwater samples prior to sampling is summarized in Table C.

Table C: Groundwater Parameter at each Monitoring Well Location just before Groundwater Sampling

LocationWater

Depth (m)Bottom of

Monitoring Well (m) pH Conductivity Temperature15-MW1 2.434m 2.941m 6.54 1,130 µS/cm 15.5oC

15-MW2 2.609m 3.392m 6.62 731 µS/cm 20.2oC

15-MW4 5.419m 8.961m 8.25 651 µS/cm 14.4oC

Note: Water depth and bottom of monitoring well were measured from the top of pipe at each monitoring well location. The top of pipeapproximately coincides with the ground surface.

The analytical program applied for the groundwater samples collected from each monitoring well location issummarized in Table D.

Table D: Analytical Plan for Groundwater Samples collected during the Sub-Surface Investigations

Location Analysis15-MW1 LEPH/HEPH/PAHs, VOCs/VPHs, Total Suspended Solids, Total Oil and Grease and Dissolved Metals

15-MW2 LEPH/HEPH/PAHs, VOCs/VPHs, Total Suspended Solids, Total Oil and Grease and Dissolved Metals

15-MW4 Total Suspended Solids, Total Oil and Grease and Dissolved Metals

The soil and groundwater samples submitted for analysis were submitted on a routine turnaround time of five toseven business days. The tabulated analytical results (Tables 1 through 9) are provided in Appendix D. Theassociated chain of custody and laboratory certificates are provided in Appendix E and F respectively.

Drilling activities at 15-MW1, 15-BH3 and 15-MW4, revealed that the stratigraphy beneath the roadway waswithout debris or deleterious odour. However, during drilling at 15-MW2 (located west of the intersection of GreatNorthern Way and Glen Drive), fill was encountered between the depths of 1.5m and 3m below grade. Debrisencountered in this layer included broken glass, wood waste, foam-like material mixed with silt. The silt exhibitedslight to moderate petroleum hydrocarbon like odour. Debris was not encountered below 3m below grade at 15-MW2.

4.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

The following subsections outline the geological and environmental site characterization based on the results ofthe subsurface investigation.

4.2.1 Geological Characterization

Subsurface conditions encountered at the borehole locations were variable and generally reflective of conditionsanticipated from the desktop review. The boreholes generally encountered asphalt overlying fill, overlying nativesoil and sandstone / siltstone deposits. The asphalt varied in thickness between approximately 150 and 450mm,with the thickest layer of asphalt being located at 15MW-02 in an area underlain by random fill.





The fill deposits underlying the asphalt at the borehole locations varied in thickness along the proposed seweralignment, with the fill thickness generally increasing from west to east. Fill deposits at 15-MW2 extended to atleast 3.0 m, and possibly up to 4.9 m, and included soft silt fill with organics, wood waste and glass, overlying softsilt. The fill material at 15-MW1 in the vicinity of the pump station was comprised of sand with varying amountsof silt to approximately 4.0 m below surface grade. Towards the west extent of the proposed sewer alignmentalong Great Northern Way, the fill thickness decreased to less than approximately 1.5 m at 15-MW4 and 15-BH3,and was comprised of silt with varying amounts of sand.

Underlying the fill deposits, the native soils generally consisted of silt and sand overlying an inferred weaksandstone or siltstone bedrock. The depth to the sandstone / siltstone bedrock increased along the proposedsewer alignment from west to east. Near the existing Glen Pump Station (15-MW1), bedrock was inferred at adepth of approximately 4.6 m below surface grade. Bedrock was likely at about 6.7 m below grade near theintersection of Glen Drive and Great Northern Way (15-MW2). At the west portion of the sewer alignment (15BH-03 and 15MW-04) bedrock is likely present at depths at or less than 1.5 m below surface grade.

Based on the depth to pipe invert increasing from approximately 2.5 m at Glen Pump Station to 3.5 m at the westterminus of the alignment, the drilling indicates a greater likelihood of random fill materials below pipe invert inthe easterly portion of the alignment.

As reported in Table C, groundwater was encountered at approximately 2.5 m below grade near the east portionof the alignment (15-MW1 and 15-MW2). The water depth reading was 5.4 m below grade near the west portionof the alignment (15-MW4) in an area inferred to be underlain by shallow bedrock.

It should be noted that the above descriptions of bedrock depths are somewhat uncertain, and therefore thisreport and the attached soil logs use language such as “likely”, “approximately”, “inferred” and “possibly” todescribe the depth of sandstone and siltstone. The reason for this is that the field investigation was completedusing a solid-stem auger drill bit selected to penetrate and enable effective sampling of the expected fill materials.Such equipment has a tendency to disturb / rework in weak situ sandstone and siltstone rock deposits, such thatthese deposits may appear as sand or silt soil when the auger is retrieved to the ground surface. As a result, theattached soil logs describe the condition of the material which was logged in the field during the drillinginvestigation, and also where appropriate identifies deposits as “possibly” sandstone or siltstone, based on ourunderstanding of the geological history of the site, drilling resistance and experience with other nearby projectsites. It would be necessary to core or advance a SONIC bit to obtain better quality samples for confirmation.

4.2.2 Environmental Characterization

Soil samples collected from the auger flights were submitted as per the analytical program outlined in Table B.The results of the analysis were compared to the applicable BC Ministry of Environment (BC MoE) ContaminatedSites Regulation (CSR) Industrial Land Use (IL) and Schedule 7 Relocation to Non-Agricultural Lands (RNAL)Standards. Analytical results revealed that the soil samples collected from 15-MW1, 15-BH3 and 15-MW4 met theapplicable CSR standards for metals. However, zinc exceedance was identified in the soil sample collected from15-MW2 at a depth of 2.4m below grade. The zinc concentration of this soil sample (185ug/g) exceeded the CSRRelocation to Non-Agricultural Land standard (150ug/g).

Petroleum hydrocarbon (such as HEPH, PAHs, VPH and xylenes) were above the laboratory detection limits, butdid not exceed the applicable CSR Standards. This indicates that the anticipated fill layer was intersected in thearea of 15-MW2.





Groundwater samples collected from each monitoring well location (15-MW1, 15-MW2 and 15-MW4) were alsosubmitted for applicable PCOCs as prescribed in Table D. The analytical results indicated that concentrations ofdissolved metals met the applicable CSR groundwater flow for drinking water use (DW) standards. The dissolvediron concentration at 15-MW2 was 42 mg/L, however at 15-MW1 it was 0.95 mg/L and below the laboratorydetection limit at 15-MW3. The dissolved iron concentration at 15-MW2 is above the CSR DW standard(6,500µg/L) and the MetroVancouver sewer use By-Law (total iron should be less than 10 mg/L). Dissolvedmanganese concentrations at 15-MW1 (0.855mg/L) and 15-MW2 (1.75mg/L) also exceed CSR DW standard of0.55mg/L but met MetroVancouver’s sewer use Bylaw limit for total manganese of 5mg/L. The LEPH/EPHw10-19

concentrations in the groundwater sample collected from 15-MW1 and 15-MW2 were below the applicablestandards. PAH and VOC concentrations from the groundwater sample collected from 15-MW1 and 15-MW2 werebelow laboratory detection limits and met the applicable CSR standards.

Groundwater samples collected from each well location were also submitted for total suspended solids and totaloil and grease. Although no BC CSR groundwater standards apply for these parameters, the analysis wasconducted to determine the quality of the groundwater that is expected to infiltrate through the alignment. If thegroundwater from each well location was to be directly discharged into the sanitary sewer, the total suspendedsolids and total oil and grease levels from these groundwater samples would meet the applicable bylaw limits.

5 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 GENERAL

The geotechnical and environmental subsurface assessment indicates that the southern edge of the GreatNorthern Way lies close to the southern shoreline of the historical infilled False Creek inlet. A critical finding interms of design issues and potential construction costs is the difference in engineering and environmentalconsiderations of an alignment that is located within the random fills in the former inlet and an alignment locatedbeyond the footprint of the inlet. The soil and groundwater conditions, including the thickness and quality of fill,could change significantly in the north-south direction across Great Northern Way. As such, from a geotechnicaland environmental viewpoint, it is would prudent to establish an alignment south of the Great Northern Way toreduce design challenges and construction costs. Should it be necessary to utilize a sewer alignment that is firmlywithin the area of historical infilling, we would recommend that consideration be given to a civil design that utilizesa shallow forcemain type solution to reduce issues related to groundwater management, temporary excavationsupport and the impact of long-term ongoing settlements (as would impact a deeper low gradient gravity typeline).

We have not at this time given much consideration to a trenchless installation methodology in which deepexcavation support and dewatering issues could be significantly reduced as this is generally beyond the scope ofthe feasibility review. Our initial view is that a trenchless installation option would be prohibitively expensive forthe proposed design due to a combination of grade control issues, pipe diameter and the nature of the subsurfaceconditions. A specific review of trenchless options could be undertaken, if requested.

We anticipate that conventional large excavation equipment can be used to rip, hammer or excavate the soils andweak sandstone / siltstone encountered during the subsurface investigation. We note that it is possible thatboulders of glacial origin may be encountered along the proposed alignment, which may require hard excavatingand breaking. Blasting should generally be avoided due to the presence of loose materials and nearbyunderground utilities.





Subsurface conditions in the vicinity of the proposed replacement pump station on Glen Drive include firm groundbearing conditions at a depth of around 4 m. Assuming that the pump station foundation elements extend to firmground, it is likely that a system of conventional reinforced concrete footings or raft can be used. Detailed designwill need to look at lateral loading and seismic response of poor ground adjacent the new structure. Constructionconsiderations will include temporary ground support, dewatering and off site settlement induced throughconstruction dewatering.

The results indicated that the registered properties identified in Levelton’s Desktop Review posed a low potentialof environmental concern to the alignment. The bulk fill identified in Levelton’s Desktop Review was likelyintersected at the borehole location 15-MW2, due to the various types of refuse observed during drilling. Thelateral extent of the bulk fill was not delineate during this investigation but would be expected to extend to thenorth. The laboratory analysis indicates that the fill and groundwater is contaminated in the area of 15-MW2.Approximate costs pertaining to the soil transport and disposal of the encountered soil and debris in 15-MW2 canbe obtained based on the soil results obtained from this investigation.

PCOC concentrations in the groundwater collected from each of the monitoring well locations (15-MW1, MW2and 15-MW4) met the applicable CSR DW standards with the exception of dissolved iron. Treatment of metals inthe infiltrating groundwater (specifically iron) would be considered necessary prior to discharge into the sanitarysewer, specifically for groundwater infiltrating from the fill layer in the area of 15-MW2. There may be variabilityin the concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater in the vicinity of 15-MW2 which may also requiresome treatment. Further assessment would be necessary to refine groundwater discharge volumes necessary tofacilitate the completion of the Waste Discharge Application, which is discussed in section 5.2. The depth of thepipe, nature of the material and duration of the works would need to be reviewed along with confirmation of themunicipalities’ requirements for this particular project.

5.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING CONSIDERATIONS

Prior to the commencement of the trench excavation, a waste discharge permit will need to be obtained from theCity of Vancouver. Effluent discharge will need to be collected and submitted to a qualified laboratory for theanalysis of total metals, total suspended solids, total oil & grease and total PAHs. From a technical perspective,the effluent should be analyzed to determine whether the maximum allowable discharge concentrations havebeen met, as required by the waste discharge permit. In the absence of other arrangements, we would anticipatethat disposal of the infiltrating groundwater encountered during the excavation activities would be subjected tothe City of Vancouver’s Sewer and Watercourse Bylaw No. 8093. Further review and discussions should be heldwith the municipality to establish whether infiltrating groundwater encountered during the construction works isrequired to be treated to lower iron concentration to the permissible limit of the GVSDDSUB Schedule B RestrictedWaste standards. A copy of the applicable Metro Vancouver and City of Vancouver Sewerage Bylaws is includedin Appendix G.

5.3 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

5.3.1 Sewer Alignment

As indicated above, a key finding from the assessment is the proximity of Great Northern Way to the southernlimit of the former False Creek shoreline. In general, a northward relocation of the sewer alignment may have asignificant impact on the environmental and geotechnical design recommendations as we would expect thesubsurface conditions, including the extent and quality of fill soils, to vary significantly in the north-south direction





across Great Northern Way. A significant consideration related to an alignment that is within the bulk infill is thepotential impact on existing buried infrastructure and the requirements for trench support to support the existinglocal infrastructure and roadway during construction.

5.3.2 Seismic Design Considerations

The City of Vancouver has indicated that there are no seismic design requirements for new sewer constructionbut that the City will require a new pump station facility to be post-disaster operational, and designed to meetthe requirements of the 2012 British Columbia Building Code. Therefore, the discussion herein pertaining toseismic design is focussed to a possible new pump station near the existing Glen Pump Station, and is based onthe soil conditions observed at 15-MW1.

The seismic provisions of the 2012 British Columbia Building Code are based on an earthquake with 2% probabilityof exceedance in 50 years, or the A2475 event. Amplification factors Fa and Fv to describe the amplification ofoutcrop earthquake motions for seismic design are based on site categories which are defined as different SiteClasses in Table 4.1.8.4A of the 2012 BC Building. Site Class is generally based on the soil or bedrock propertiesaveraged over the 30 m depth immediately below the structure footings.

The subsurface site conditions near 15-MW1 are expected to vary with depth from sand fill to more competentnative soil or bedrock deposits. Foundations that are located at least 4 m below the existing surface grade (e.g.the wet well) would likely bear within very dense soil and weak rock. However, the sand fill deposits below thewater table (between approximately 2.5 and 4.0 m depth) may be susceptible to liquefaction during the A2475design earthquake. Lowering foundations to the firm ground, removing and/or replacing the existing fill withapproved engineering fill would be options to review during detailed design. It would be intended for foundationdesign/ground improvement to be completed in a manner to allow the site to be considered Site Class C in termsof seismic design.

In addition to the above, in order for a new pump station facility to be designed to be post-disaster operational,detailed design for the pump station will need to give consideration to the following:

Foundation bearing capacity for near surface structures during seismic loading and post-liquefactionstructure settlement as a result of soil reconsolidation.

Seismic lateral earth pressures against the below-grade structure walls both before and after liquefactionof the surrounding sand fills and possible ground improvement to create an adequate buffer.

Lateral spreading as a consequence of liquefaction, including the resulting horizontal forces imposed onthe subsurface structure and lateral displacements of the structure and possible ground improvement tocreate an adequate buffer; and

Requirements to avoid potential floatation of the pump station wet well as a result of liquefaction of thesurrounding soils.

Further geotechnical input would be necessary during detailed design to assess and develop mitigative measuresrelated to potential negative consequences of soil liquefaction and have a new pump station facility as post-disaster operational. Such measures could include ground improvement to create a buffer at a new pump stationlocation. We note that significant strain may develop during the A2475 earthquake in pipes not designed for





seismic loading. As a result, pipes connected to the pump station may not be in service after a design earthquakeevent.

5.3.3 Pump Station

Apart from the seismic design considerations presented in Section 5.3.2, the pump station designrecommendations will be dependent on the design depth of the pump station foundations. Near 15-MW2,naturally occurring soils below approximately 4 m would likely be suitable for construction of the wet wellfoundations. The silty sand fill is unlikely to be suitable to provide adequate bearing given the City’s requirementsfor post disaster functionality.

Other important design considerations for pump station design will include post-construction structuresettlement, lateral earth pressures against the below-grade structure walls and design against buoyancy duringboth static and dynamic conditions.

5.3.4 Long-Term Pipe Settlement

The post-construction settlement of the sewer pipe will be highly dependent on final alignment and thecharacteristics of the subgrade soils. The subgrade soils beneath the pipe invert at the borehole locationstransition from natural occurring deposits likely comprised of siltstone or sandstone near the west end of theproject alignment to soft clayey silt (possibly fill) and silty sand fill at the east end of the alignment. The soft clayeysilt will be susceptible to consolidation settlement as a result of net increases in effective stress within these soils,and also as a result of disturbance to the subgrade during construction. Some organics were also identified withinthe clayey silt beneath the proposed pipe invert and depending on the amount of organics present, long-termpipe settlement may also occur as a result of degradation of the organic deposits.

A detailed review of potential construction and post construction settlements will be required once an alignmenthas been selected and pipe inverts confirmed due to the low design gradient and the implication of total anddifferential settlement on the functionality of the pipe. Given the historical filling which occurred at the site circa1914, it is possible that the transition between settlement-insensitive materials and settlement-sensitive soils (i.e.random fills and soft clayey silt) may be abrupt. If such situations arise, it may be necessary for the civil design toincorporate joint restraints or implement subgrade improvements.

5.3.5 Pavement Restoration

Pavement structures for reinstatement of the existing roadways following the installation of the sewer pipe shouldconform to the City of Vancouver Street Restoration Manual, with the base and sub-base courses being inaccordance to the appropriate specifications for these materials and compacted to a minimum 95% ModifiedProctor density.

Alternative pavement sections may be possible and can be provided at subsequent design stages.

5.4 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS

5.4.1 Construction Trench Worker Exposure

The analytical results of the soil and groundwater sample analyses indicate the exceedance of zinc with respect tothe CSR Schedule 7 standards (non-agricultural land) in the area of 15-MW2. However, the results met theapplicable CSR soil and groundwater standards for the Site. Since the soil and groundwater samples collected andsubmitted for analysis met the applicable CSR standards for the Site, Risk Assessment for the Construction TrenchWorker exposure to the PCOCs is not considered required at this time.





Notwithstanding the zinc exceedance identified in the fill layer in 15-MW2, the human health risk posed by theconcentrations of tested potential contaminants in the encountered stratigraphy at borehole locations 15-MW1,15-BH3 and 15-MW4 is considered to be low.

5.4.2 Excavated Soil Management

Soil mixed with debris of a nature similar to that in the area of 15-MW2 should be taken to an offsite permittedfacility for disposal due to the identified zinc exceedance with respect to the applicable CSR relocation standardsto non-agricultural lands. Generally, soil with characteristics represented by the data in the area of 15-MW1, 15-BH3 and 15-MW4 may be taken to a receiving property (which is not used for agricultural purposes) or reusedwithin the alignment as backfill (subject to geotechnical approval), provided that the excavated soil is free ofdebris. Any soil with debris or with detectable CSR Schedule 11 PCOCs should be disposed off at a permittedfacility.

As noted above, the extent of the historical bulk fill has not been laterally delineated and the nature and thicknessmay vary widely, particularly if the alignment were to be moved to the north. From a soil handling perspective,additional borehole drilling and testing is recommended if the alignment is shifted to the north. Additionalborehole drilling and testing would be prudent to refine excavation/disposal volumes and costs along the currentlyalignment, if selected. We note that the contractor may need to collect and analyse soil samples during trenchexcavation activities to screen for PCOCs in the absence of sufficient testing to characterize conditions inaccordance with CSR relocation requirements.

5.4.3 Temporary Trench and Excavation Support

Temporary trench and excavation support requirements vary widely along the alignment and are dependent onthe nature of subsurface conditions, the proximity of the water table, the presence of existing infrastructure(buried or surface), as well factors including the duration of the excavation and traffic management. Forexcavations in the order of 2.5 to 3.5 m in depth there is insufficient space to consider a slope excavation for thecurrently proposed alignment. As such, open excavations will need to be supported for worker safety as well assupport adjacent utilities while maintaining trench stability. We note that the proposed sewer alignment alongthe south portion of Great Northern Way and Glen Drive is adjacent to a number of existing utilities.

Temporary unsupported excavations should be conducted in accordance with the WorkSafeBC regulations forunsupported trenches. Excavations that cannot conform to the WorkSafeBC requirements for unsupportedtrenches will require either trench boxes or internally braced sheet pile shoring. Internally braced sheet pileshoring will likely be required where it is necessary for the shoring system to support existing infrastructure duringconstruction, particularly where excavations penetrate deeper fill deposits. The objective of the sheet pile designshould be to obtain maximum penetration for sheet pile toe lateral support, preventing base heave, as well asreducing groundwater volumes into the excavation.

The installation of sheet piling has the potential to cause vibrations and to result in damage and/or settlement ofexisting structures. Installation procedures and/or performance requirements will need to be considered inspecification requirements. Sheet pile shoring will likely not be possible to drive where the excavation must extendinto the weak sandstone or siltstone bedrock, particularly near the west extent of the proposed sewer alignment.However, the more competent near-surface bedrock deposits in this area may allow the use of trench boxes,provided that adequate construction dewatering is carried out.





It should be noted that the usual purpose of using steel trench shoring boxes is to protect workers duringconstruction. Trench box systems are not considered to be suitable where it is necessary to prevent movementand support existing infrastructure, which we anticipate will be the case along much of the proposed seweralignment.

5.4.4 Construction Dewatering

Based on the groundwater readings at monitoring wells installed during the subsurface investigation, groundwatermay be encountered during construction at approximately 2.5 m below grade near the east end of the seweralignment along Great Northern Way and near Glen Pump Station. Groundwater was recorded below the depthof the pipe invert at the west extent of the sewer alignment; however, this recording may not be representativeif the groundwater had not stabilized at the 15-MW4 monitoring well when the measurement was taken.Additional groundwater level measurements should be taken at the monitoring well locations if the projectproceeds to subsequent stages to assess recovery as well seasonal water level changes, which may be low giventhe long dry summer at the time of the field investigation.

For compliance with City requirements for discharge to sewer, a water treatment system will be needed to treatthe infiltrating groundwater from the dewatering operations. Based on the results from 15-MW2, water treatmentshould be expected in areas where debris and fill is encountered below the water table.

Construction dewatering requirements will vary along the length of the proposed sewer alignment dependent onground conditions, pipe invert and the form of trench support. In general, construction dewatering can likely becompleted by pumping from sumps along the alignment of the sewer. There may also be opportunity to work inthe wet where the elevation of groundwater is modest. However, excavation in the vicinity of Glen Drive mayneed to be completed using well-point dewatering as significant amounts of groundwater seepage are expectedfrom the sand fills encountered at 15-MW1. Water seepage into the construction excavations should also beanticipated from the granular trench backfill of existing utilities adjacent to the proposed sewer.

The contractor will need to develop appropriate methodology to maintain safe and suitable conditions that mightinclude limiting the length of open excavations along the alignment during construction in order to reducedewatering requirements.

Dewatering increases the effective stress on soils and may cause settlement of existing infrastructure. Furtherreview is required once project details become known.

5.4.5 Pipe Bedding and Trench Backfill

Pipe bedding requirements should comply with City specification requirements, which may vary as the subgradeand groundwater conditions change along the proposed sewer alignment. For preliminary guidance, we wouldrecommend the following:

Where exposed subgrade consists of competent native soils or sandstone / siltstone deposits, pipebedding and surround material should conform to the gradation specifications for 20mm to 2.5 mm ClearCrushed Coarse Aggregate (Pipe Bedding) contained in the City of Vancouver Street Restoration Manual.In these areas pipe bedding should extend to not less than 300 mm below the pipe invert.

Where exposed subgrade consists of soft fine-grained or organic soils, a non-woven high survivabilitygeotextile separator should be placed over the subgrade prior to placing the 20 mm to 2.5 mm ClearCrushed Coarse Aggregate pipe bedding. It may also be necessary to incorporate a layer of clear crush





gravel atop the geotextile separator if the subgrade conditions will not allow for proper compaction of thepipe bedding. The clear crush gravel would likely need to be fully wrapped within the geotextile separator.Where soft or organic subgrade is encountered, pipe bedding will likely need to extend up to 600 mmbelow pipe invert, or to competent subgrade.

Given the practical space and traffic constraints, trench backfill above the pipe zone is expected to be imported,and conform to the gradation requirements for sand fill within the City of Vancouver Street Restoration Manual,or should be well-graded pit run sand and gravel with no more than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve. While portionsof the existing materials encountered during the excavation process may be suitable for use as trench backfill, itis unlikely to be practical to consider reuse. We note that much of the existing fill soils encountered at theboreholes were silt deposits, which are considered unsuitable for use as trench backfill.

From an environmental perspective, the backfill material to be used in the trench of the proposed sanitary seweralignment must meet the applicable CSR Schedule 7 standards for relocation to non-agricultural lands and theapplicable CSR Industrial Land Use standards.

The pipe bedding and trench backfill should be uniformly compacted in horizontal lifts with vibratory equipmentto not less than 95% Modified Proctor density in accordance with City specification requirements.

5.5 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

The initial geotechnical and environmental characterization that has been undertaken has identified a highlyvariable setting with the potential for different design and construction issues to be introduced over shortdistances. Levelton needs to be engaged in subsequent stages of the review to provide input on potentialimplications or consequences related to alignment or invert changes. If the Great Northern Way alignment optionfor a gravity pipe continues to detailed design, we would recommend some further characterization to assess filldistribution, and its engineering and environmental properties. The potential for settlement as well as hydraulicconductivity are important considerations.

From a geotechnical perspective, additional test holes to profile the fill thickness and depth to bedrock would beof use in design and for tender support. Geotechnical input requirements for foundation design and possibleground improvement for the pump station will depend on the location and depth of the structure and civilconsiderations related to the performance requirements of the tie-ins.





6 CLOSURE

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Associated Engineering (BC) Ltd. The City of Vancouver is

considered to be an authorized user of the report subject to the Terms of Engagement under which the work was

undertaken. The report has been prepared in accordance with the attached Terms of Reference for Geotechnical

Reports and Environmental Standard Limitations (Appendix H).

We thank you for the opportunity to have completed this further stage of assessment and we look forward to

assisting the AEL team in reviewing the sewer alignment should the City decide to pursue the pump station

abandonment option. If you have any questions, please call the undersigned at (604) 278-1411.

Sincerely,


Prepared by:

Original Signed by

________________________________________

Per: Jason Tung, EIT

Environmental Engineer

Reviewed by:

Original Stamped and Signed by

____________________________________________

Per: Jay Rao, M.A.Sc., P.Eng

Senior Environmental Engineer

Prepared by:

Original Signed by

________________________________________

Per: Graeme McAllister, P.Eng.

Geotechnical Engineer

Reviewed by:

Original Stamped and Signed by

____________________________________________

Per: Carl Miller, M.Sc., P.Eng

Manager, BC Geotechnical Division

Appendix A: Figures

THT

Feasibility Study - Glen Pump Station Abandonment

R615-0685-01

AUG 2015

Associated Engineering / City of Vancouver

Great Northern Way between Fraser St and Glen Drive

Vancouver, BC

Site Location Plan

1

As Shown

MW4

BH3

MW2

MW1

THT

R615-0685-01

AUG 2015THT

FEASIBILITY STUDY -GLEN PUMP STATION ABANDONMENT

CITY OF VANCOUVER c/oASSOCIATED ENGINEERING

- MONITORING WELL LOCATION

- BOREHOLE LOCATION

SITE PLAN SHOWING BOREHOLE LOCATIONS

2

- PROPERTY LINE

MW4

BH3

MW2

MW1

THT

R615-0685-01

AUG 2015THT




- BOREHOLE LOCATION

DETAILED SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS

3

- PROPERTY LINE

Depths 1.0m 1.8m

Metals < IL, RNAL < IL, RNAL

15-MW1

05-Aug-15

Depths 1.2m 2.1m


15-BH3

05-Aug-15Depths 0.6m 2.1m


05-Aug-15

15-MW4

Depths 2.4m 3.6m

Metals < IL, RNAL, except: < IL, RNAL

Zinc < IL, > RNAL < IL, RNAL

EPH(10-19), LEPH ND NA

EPH(19-32), HEPH 220µg/g < IL, < RNAL NA

VPH 75µg/g < IL, < RNAL NA

PAHs < IL, RNAL NA

VOCs ND, except NA

Xylenes (total) 0.27µg/L < IL, < RNAL NA

15-MW2

05-Aug-15

- SAMPLE CONCENTRATION MEET APPLICABLECSR STANDARDS

- SAMPLE CONCENTRATION EXCEEDAPPLICABLE CSR STANDARDS

MW4

MW2

MW1

THT

R615-0685-01

AUG 2015THT




DETAILED GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

4

- PROPERTY LINE

- SAMPLE CONCENTRATION MEET APPLICABLECSR STANDARDS

- SAMPLE CONCENTRATION EXCEEDAPPLICABLE CSR STANDARDS

Metals < DW

TSS 192mg/L

15-MW4

08-Aug-15 Metals < DW, except

Dissolved Iron 42,600 µg/L > DW

Dissolved Manganese 1,750 µg/L > DW

EPHw (10-19) 190µg/L < DW

HEPH ND

PAHs ND, except

Acenaphthene 0.09µg/L, NS

VOCs / VPH ND

TSS 25mg/L, NS

15-MW2

07-Aug-15

Metals < DW, except

Dissolved Manganese 855 µg/L > DW

EPHw (10-19) 440µg/L < DW

HEPH 551µg/L, NS

PAHs ND

VOCs / VPH ND

TSS 12mg/L, NS

15-MW1

07-Aug-15

Appendix B: Photographs

Levelton File # R615-0685-01August 21, 2015

Associated EngineeringPreliminary Subsurface InvestigationsGreat Northern Way, Vancouver, BC

Page | 1

Photograph 1: Utility location underway in the area of 15-MW4 (5 Aug 2015).

Photograph 2: Auger flight at 15-MW1 extending from 3m to 4.6m belowgrade (5 August 2015).



Page | 2

Photograph 3: Auger flight retrieved from 15-MW4 between 1.5m and 3.1mbelow grade (5 August 2015).

Photograph 4: Saturated soil encountered between 7.6m and 9.1m belowgrade (5 August 2015).



Page | 3

Photograph 5: Monitoring well installation underway at 15-MW4 (5 August2015).

Photograph 6: Split Spoon sampling underway at 15-BH3 (5 August 2015).



Page | 4

Photograph 7: Headspace screening and water level measurement prior towell development at 15-MW1 (5 August 2015).

Photograph 8: Debris (broken glass, foam and wire) encountered at a depth ofapproximately 0.5m below grade (5 August 2015).



Page | 5

Photograph 9: Auger flight from 6.1m to 7.6m below grade at 15-MW2(5 August 2015).

Photograph 10: Location of 15-MW2 (6 August 2015).



Page | 6

Photograph 11: Location of 15-MW4 (6 August 2015).

Photograph 12: Groundwater sampling setup at 15-MW2 (8 August 2015).

Appendix C: Borehole Logs

150mm of ASPHALT

FILL - brown-grey fine to coarse SAND, trace gravelto gravelly, moist

------------------------------------------------------becomes reddish brown, trace silt to silty

------------------------------------------------------becomes orange brown

------------------------------------------------------becomes grey

Grey, silty, fine to coarse SAND, moist (till-like)

Grey silty SAND, some clay, moist (possibly augeredsandstone or siltstone)

Bottom of hole at 7.62 meters

Aug 52015

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 1 of 1

15MW-01

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows

WH : Weight of Hammer

WR : Weight of Rod

Standard Penetration Test : ASTM D1586

Hammer Type:

C: Condition of Sample

Good

Disturbed

No Recovery

Date Drilled: 15/08/2015

Type: Type of Sampler

SPT : 2 in. standard

ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE

Moisture Content % Plastic Limit % Liquid Limit % Ground Water Level Shear strength in kPa (Torvane or

Penetrometer) Shear strength in kPa (Unconfined) Shear strength in kPa (field vane) Remolded strength in kPa Percent Passing # 200 sieve

Wat

erLe

vel

Glen Pump Station AbandonmentVancouver, British Columbia

Solid Stem AugerTHIS LOG IS FOR GEOTECHNICAL PURPOSES ONLY

THIS LOG IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LEVELTONCONSULTANTS LTD AND CANNOT BE USED OR DUPLICATED

IN ANY WAY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION.

C

Typ

e

N

By: SM

Drill Method:


(m)

2

4

6

8

(ft)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

Project No: R615-0685-01

Depth

#150 - 12791 Clarke PlaceRichmond, B.C., V6V 2H9Tel: 604-278-1411Fax: 604-278-1042www.levelton.com

1 LO

G P

ER

PA

GE

R61

5-06

85-0

1 -

15M

W1

TO

15M

W4.

GP

J L

EV

ELT

ON

.GD

T 2

8/8/

15

15-MW1 @0.4m

15-MW1 @1m

15-MW1 @1.8m

15-MW1 @2.4m

15-MW1 @3.3m

15-MW1 @4.6m

15-MW1 @5.5m

15-MW1 @6.6m

Metals

Metals

0.2

3.9

7.6

ASPHALT

FILL - compact, brown to grey,fine to coarse SAND, trace gravel,moist, no odour

- gravelly, trace silt to silty,reddish brown below 1.2m

- orangish brown below 2.1m

- grey below 3.1m

Grey silty, fine to coarse SAND,moist, no odour (till-like)

- some clay below 4.6m (possibleaugered sandstone or siltstone)


Depth Sample

Filter Sand

Bentonite

Solid Pipe

Slotted Pipe

Slough/Cuttings

Concrete

NotesWater level measuredat 2.434m below top ofpipe on 7 Aug 2015

Asphalt

Fill (made ground)

Silty SAND

Soil Symbols Logged By SM

Elevation (grade)

Drill Method Solid Stem Auger

Drilled/Excavated By Downrite Drilling

Date Drilledor Excavated 05/08/2015

Water LevelRecorded On 07/08/2015

Type

Well andBackfillDetails

This log is for enviromental purposes only.This log is the sole property of Levelton Consultants Ltd. and cannotbe used or duplicated in anyway without express written permission.

Number/ID

Laboratory Analysis/Comments

Sample Symbols

Grab Sample

Backfill Symbols

Depth(m)

(m)

2

4

6

8

Description(ft)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

Levelton

15-MW1


Pg 1 of 1Associated Engineering

Vancouver, BC,H

AZ

MA

TR

61

5-0

68

5-0

1-

EN

V.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

DA

TA

TE

MP

LA

TE

.GD

T3

1/8

/15

10 100 1000

Headspace VapourConcentration

(ppmv)Sym

bo

l<<

<<

<<

<<

<<

450mm of ASPHALT

FILL - very soft to firm dark brown SILT, some sand tosandy, trace to some gravel, some organics, woodwaste, glass, moist to wet

Soft, grey-brown clayey SILT, trace to some sand,organics, mottling, moist to wet (possibly fill)

Grey silty SAND/ sandy SILT interlayered, tracegravel, moist

Firm to stiff, grey SILT, some clay, some sand, somegravel

Grey silty SAND/ sandy SILT interlayered, tracegravel, moist (possibly augered sandstone)


Aug 72015

SPT

GG

G

SPT

G

G

G

SPT

G

G

8

2

18

Pg 1 of 1

15MW-02

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows


WR : Weight of Rod


Hammer Type:


Good

Disturbed

No Recovery




ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE



Wat

erLe

vel





C

Typ

e

N

By: SM

Drill Method:


(m)

2

4

6

8

(ft)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32


Depth


1 LO

G P

ER

PA

GE

R61

5-06

85-0

1 -

15M

W1

TO

15M

W4.

GP

J L

EV

ELT

ON

.GD

T 2

8/8/

15

MC = 258.6%

15-MW2 @1m

15-MW2 @2.4m

15-MW2 @3.6m

15-MW2 @4.2m

15-MW2 @5.7m

15-MW2 @6.7m

LEPH/HEPH/PAHs,VOCs/VPH, Metals

Metals

0.5

4.9

6.1

6.7

9.1

ASPHALT

FILL - very soft to firm dark brownSILT, some sand to sandy, traceto some gravel, some organics,moist to wet, organic-like odour,debris (broken glass, wood waste,etc.) observed- trace to moderate petroleumhydrocarbon like odour, debrisincluding broken glass, foam-likematerial and wires observedbelow 1.5m

- soft, grey to brown, clayey, traceto some sand, organics, mottling,moist to wet below 3.1m (possiblefill)

Grey silty SAND / sandy SILT(interlayered), trace gravel, moist,no odour

Firm to stiff, grey SILT, some clay,some sand, damp, no odour

Grey silty SAND / sandy SILT(interlayered), trace gravel, moist,no odour (possible augeredsandstone)


Depth Sample

Filter Sand

Bentonite

Solid Pipe

Slotted Pipe

Slough/Cuttings

Concrete


Asphalt

SILT

Silty SAND/SandySILT layered


Elevation (grade)





Type



Number/ID


Sample Symbols

Grab Sample

Backfill Symbols

Depth(m)

(m)

2

4

6

8

Description(ft)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

Levelton

15-MW2



Vancouver, BC,H

AZ

MA

TR

61

5-0

68

5-0

1-

EN

V.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

DA

TA

TE

MP

LA

TE

.GD

T3

1/8

/15

10 100 1000


(ppmv)Sym

bo

l

1.2

8

<<

<<

<<

<<

200mm of ASPHALT

FILL - brown SILT, some sand to sandy, some gravel,moist

Grey SILT, some sand, some gravel, moist (till-like)

Grey SILTSTONE

Refusal at 3.20 meters

G

G

SPT

G

SPT

52 for150mm

36 for20mm

Pg 1 of 1

15BH-03

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows


WR : Weight of Rod


Hammer Type:


Good

Disturbed

No Recovery




ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE



Wat

erLe

vel





C

Typ

e

N

By: SM

Drill Method:


(m)

2

4

6

8

(ft)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32


Depth


1 LO

G P

ER

PA

GE

R61

5-06

85-0

1 -

15M

W1

TO

15M

W4.

GP

J L

EV

ELT

ON

.GD

T 2

8/8/

15

15-BH3 @0.3m

15-BH3 @1.2m

15-BH3 @2.1m

15-BH3 @3.1m

Metals

Metals

0.2

1.6

3.2

ASPHALT

FILL - brown SILT, some sand tosandy, some gravel, moist, noodour

- grey, some sand (till-like) below1.2m

Grey SILTSTONE


Depth Sample

Filter Sand

Bentonite

Solid Pipe

Slotted Pipe

Slough/Cuttings

Concrete

Notes

Asphalt

SILT

Bedrock


Elevation (grade)




Water LevelRecorded On

Type



Number/ID


Sample Symbols

Grab Sample

Backfill Symbols

Depth(m)

(m)

1

2

3

4

Description(ft)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Levelton

15-BH3



Vancouver, BC,H

AZ

MA

TR

61

5-0

68

5-0

1-

EN

V.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

DA

TA

TE

MP

LA

TE

.GD

T3

1/8

/15

10 100 1000


(ppmv)Sym

bo

l

<<

<<

170mm of ASPHALT

Brown sandy SILT (possibly fill or augered sandstone)

Grey clayey SILT (possibly augered siltstone)

Black lignite coal, moist (possibly crushed from auger)

Brown-grey SILT, some clay, moist (possibly augeredsiltstone)

Grey clayey SILT/sandy SILT (possibly augeredsandstone or siltstone)

Grey SILTSTONE


Aug 72015

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

Pg 1 of 1

15MW-04

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Description

N: Number of Blows


WR : Weight of Rod


Hammer Type:


Good

Disturbed

No Recovery




ST : Shelby

FP : Fixed Piston

G : Grab

CORE



Wat

erLe

vel





C

Typ

e

N

By: SM

Drill Method:


(m)

2

4

6

8

(ft)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32


Depth


1 LO

G P

ER

PA

GE

R61

5-06

85-0

1 -

15M

W1

TO

15M

W4.

GP

J L

EV

ELT

ON

.GD

T 2

8/8/

15

15-MW4 @0.6m

15-MW4 @2.1m

15-MW4 @3.3m

15-MW4 @4.8m

15-MW4 @6.7m

15-MW4 @8.2m

Metals

Metals

0.2

6.1

9.1

ASPHALT

Brown sandy SILT, damp, noodour (possible fill or augeredsandstone)

- grey clayey, damp-moist below1.5m (possible augered siltstone)

- firm to stiff, dark brown, moistbelow 3.1m (coal-like?)

- brown to grey, some clay, moistbelow 3.6m (possible augeredsiltstone)

- grey, clayey, sandy below 4.6m

Grey SILTSTONE


Depth Sample

Filter Sand

Bentonite

Solid Pipe

Slotted Pipe

Slough/Cuttings

Concrete


Asphalt

SILT

Bedrock


Elevation (grade)





Type



Number/ID


Sample Symbols

Grab Sample

Backfill Symbols

Depth(m)

(m)

2

4

6

8

Description(ft)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

Levelton

15-MW4



Vancouver, BC,H

AZ

MA

TR

61

5-0

68

5-0

1-

EN

V.G

PJ

LE

VE

LT

ON

DA

TA

TE

MP

LA

TE

.GD

T3

1/8

/15

10 100 1000


(ppmv)Sym

bo

l

<<

<<

<<

<<

<<

Appendix D: Analytical Result Tables

Feasibility StudyGlen Pump Station Abandonment

R615-0685-01September 2015

PARAMETERS RDL [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] CSR IL Standards (1)Sample Date 05-Aug-15 05-Aug-15 05-Aug-15 05-Aug-15 05-Aug-15 05-Aug-15 05-Aug-15 05-Aug-15

pH 0.1 8 6.6 7.4 7.6 6.9 8.7 7 6 NS NSAntimony 0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 1.5 0.6 40 20Arsenic 0.4 0.5 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.9 2.4 3.9 4.4 20 (2) 15Barium 1 33 38 52 76 67 44 215 82 1500 (2) 400Beryllium 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 8 4Boron 2 <2 <2 <2 3 <2 <2 16 9 NS NSCadmium 0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 0.15 0.11 0.09 0.37 0.09 2-150 (2) 1.5Chromium 1 7.1 8.2 11.3 19.6 47.5 49.8 21.3 28.1 100 (3) 60Cobalt 0.1 4.2 4 7.1 14.8 18 22.2 8.1 7.5 300 50Copper 0.2 13.3 12.2 14.8 46 32.3 37.3 43.5 37.9 250 (2) 90Lead 0.2 1.8 6.3 2.9 8.3 8.5 3.1 93.3 21.4 300-2000 (4,2) 100Lithium 0.1 2.6 4.3 6.9 12.9 8.3 16.3 8.8 14.9 NS NSManganese 0.4 157 281 302 473 460 626 308 236 19,000 (3) NSMercury 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.67 0.08 150 (2) 15Molybdenum 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1 0.4 0.6 1.3 2.8 40 10Nickel 0.4 7.2 5.9 6.5 15.3 45.5 44 16.2 17.5 500 100Selenium 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 10 3Silver 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.6 <0.2 40 20Strontium 0.2 23.4 21.1 21.1 35.9 94.8 117 80.4 43.5 NS NSThallium 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 NS NSTin 0.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.6 37 22.3 300 50Uranium 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.5 2.1 200 (3) NSVanadium 0.4 28.8 40 41.1 63.3 93.2 118 44.4 51.6 NS 200Zinc 2 23 28 45 87 60 65 185 56 150-600 (2) 150

NOTES

Results and standards in µg/g or parts per million (ppm) unless otherwise statedRDL - Reported Detection Limit"-" - Not analyzed / cannot be calculatedNS indicates that no standard applies1 - CSR Schedule 4, Generic Numerical Soil Standards unless noted otherwise2 - CSR Schedule 5, Matrix Numerical Soil Standards3 - CSR Schedule 10, Generic Numerical Soil Standards4 - Protocol 4 - Determining Background Soil Quality - Regional Background Concentration for Greater Vancouver5 - CSR Schedule 7, Relocation to Non-Agricultural Land Standards

BOLD Sample concentration exceeds the applicable standard or criteriaBOLD Sample concentration exceeds the CSR Schedule 7 Relocation Standards to non-agricultural lands

CSR Schedule 7

Relocation to Non-

Agricultural Lands (5)

Table 1Results of Soil Samples

Metals AnalysesPage 1 of 1


R615-0685-01September 2015

Page 1 of 1

PARAMETERS RDL [email protected] CSR IL Standards (1)

Sample Date 05-Aug-15

EPHs (10-19) 50 <60 ~2000 NSEPHs (19-32) 50 220 ~5000 NSLEPH 60 <60 2000 1000HEPH 50 220 5000 1000VHs (6-10) 20 76 NS NSVPHs 20 75 200 200Benzene 0.02 <0.04 0.04 (2) 0.04Ethylbenzene 0.05 <0.13 7 (2) 1Toluene 0.2 <0.53 2.5 (2) 1.5

Xylenes (total) 0.1 0.27 20 (2) 5

NOTES

Results and standards in µg/g or parts per million (ppm) unless otherwise statedRDL - Reported Detection Limit"~" - Compared to LEPH and HEPH standards"-" - Not analyzed / cannot be calculatedNS indicates that no standard applies1 - CSR Schedule 4, Generic Numerical Soil Standards unless noted otherwise2 - CSR Schedule 5, Matrix Numerical Soil Standards3 - CSR Schedule 10, Generic Numerical Soil Standards4 - CSR Schedule 7, Relocation to Non-Agricultural Land Standards

BOLD Sample concentration exceeds the applicable standard or criteria

BOLD Sample concentration is greater than laboratory detection limits


LEPH/HEPH & BTEX/VPH Analyses

CSR Schedule 7

Relocation to Non-

Agricultural Lands

(4)


R615-0685-01September 2015

Page 1 of 1

PARAMETERS RDL [email protected] CSR IL Standards (1)

Sample Date 05-Aug-15

Acenaphthene Z1 <0.10 NS NSAcenaphthylene Z2 0.1 NS NSAnthracene Z3 0.15 NS NSBenzo (a) anthracene Z4 0.32 10 1Benzo (a) pyrene Z5 0.26 10 (2) 1Benzo (b) fluoranthene Z6 0.45 10 1Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Z7 0.23 NS NSBenzo (k) fluoranthene Z8 0.35 10 1Chrysene Z9 0.45 NS NSDibenz (a,h) anthracene Z10 <0.10 10 1Fluoranthene Z11 0.9 NS NSFluorene Z12 <0.10 NS NSIndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Z13 0.18 10 1Naphthalene Z14 0.16 50 5Phenanthrene Z15 0.4 50 5

Pyrene Z16 0.89 100 10

NOTES

Results and standards in µg/g or parts per million (ppm) unless otherwise statedRDL - Reported Detection LimitNS indicates that no standard applies1 - CSR Schedule 4, Generic Numerical Soil Standards unless noted otherwise2 - CSR Schedule 5, Matrix Numerical Soil Standards (Groundwater used for drinking water)3 - CSR Schedule 10, Generic Numerical Soil Standards

BOLD Sample concentration exceeds the applicable standard or criteriaBOLD Sample concentration is greater than laboratory detection limits


PAH Analyses

CSR Schedule 7

Relocation to Non-

Agricultural Lands

(4)


R615-0685-01September 2015

Page 1 of 1

PARAMETERS RDL [email protected] CSR IL Standards (1)Sample Date 05-Aug-15

Benzene 0.02 <0.04 0.04 (2) 0.04Bromodichloromethane 0.1 <0.27 18 (3) NSBromoform 0.1 <0.27 2,200 (2) NSCarbon tetrachloride 0.05 <0.13 50 5Chlorobenzene 0.05 <0.13 10 1Chloroform 0.07 <0.19 50 5Dibromochloromethane 0.1 <0.27 26 (2) NS1,2-Dibromoethane 0.1 <0.27 0.73 (3) NSDibromomethane 0.1 <0.27 230 (3) NS1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 <0.13 10 11,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 <0.13 10 11,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 <0.17 10 11,1-Dichloroethane 0.05 <0.13 50 51,2-Dichloroethane 0.05 <0.13 50 51,1-Dichloroethene 0.05 <0.13 50 5cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.1 <0.27 50 5trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.05 <0.13 50 51,2-Dichloropropane 0.05 <0.13 50 5cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05 <0.13 50 5trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05 <0.13 50 5Ethylbenzene 0.05 <0.13 7 (2) 1Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.04 <0.11 700 (3) NSMethylene chloride 0.5 <1.33 50 5Styrene 0.05 <0.13 50 51,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 <0.13 9.3 (3) 5Tetrachloroethene 0.05 <0.13 50 (2) 51,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.2 <0.53 50 5Toluene 0.05 <0.13 2.5 (2) 1.51,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.07 <0.19 50 5Trichloroethene 0.01 <0.03 0.015 (2) 0.015Trichlorofluoromethane 0.1 <0.27 2,000 (3) NSVinyl chloride 0.1 <0.27 7.5 (3) NSXylenes (total) 0.1 0.27 20 (2) 5

NOTES

Results and standards in µg/g or parts per million (ppm) unless otherwise statedRDL - Reported Detection Limit"-" - Not analyzed / cannot be calculatedNS indicates that no standard applies1 - CSR Schedule 4, Generic Numerical Soil Standards unless noted otherwise2 - CSR Schedule 5, Matrix Numerical Soil Standards3 - CSR Schedule 10, Generic Numerical Soil Standards


BOLD Sample concentration is greater than laboratory detection limitsBOLD Detection limit is greater than the applicable standard or criteria


VOC Analyses

CSR Schedule 7

Relocation to Non-

Agricultural Lands

(4)

Feasibility Study

Glen Pump Station Abandonment

R615-0685-01

September 2015

PARAMETERS RDL 15-MW1 15-MW4 15-MW2

CSR DRINKING

WATER

STANDARDS (1)

Sample Date 07-Aug-15 07-Aug-15 08-Aug-15

Hardness mg/L 5 369 91.9 571 NS

Aluminum 50 <50 <50 <50 9,500

Antimony 1 <1 <1 <1 6

Arsenic 5 <5 <5 <5 10

Barium 50 90 <50 740 1,000

Beryllium 1 <1 <1 <1 NS

Boron 40 50 80 390 5,000

Cadmium 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 5

Calcium 2000 131,000 25,200 198,000 NS

Chromium 5 <5 <5 <5 50

Cobalt 0.5 0.9 <0.5 2.5 NS

Copper 2 <2 <2 <2 1,000

Iron 100 950 <100 42,600 6,500*

Lead 1 <1 <1 <1 10

Lithium 1 <1 2 14 730 (2)

Magnesium 100 10,300 7,100 18,600 100,000

Manganese 2 855 53 1,750 550*

Mercury 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 1

Molybdenum 1 1 5 1 250

Nickel 2 <2 <2 2 NS

Selenium 5 <5 <5 <5 10

Silver 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NS

Sodium 200 55,900 149,000 51,600 200,000

Strontium 10 650 240 1,690 22,000 (2)

Thallium 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 NS

Titanium 50 <50 <50 <50 NS

Uranium 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.1 20

Vanadium 10 <10 <10 <10 NS

Zinc 40 <40 <40 <40 5,000

NOTES

Results and standards in µg/L or parts per billion (ppb) unless otherwise stated

RDL - Reported Detection Limit

"<" - Sample concentration is below Reported Detection Limit

"-" - Not analyzed / cannot be calculated

NS indicates that no standard applies

1 - CSR Schedule 6, Generic Numerical Water Standards unless otherwise noted (most stringent Standard applies)

2 - CSR Schedule 10, Generic Numerical Water Standards3 - As per Stage 8 Amendments to the CSR (25 January 2013), Fe and Mn standards are applicable only at sites with designated

* - CSR Standard applied for comparison purposes

Schedule 2 activities listed in footnotes 58 to 61 of Schedule 6.


Results of Groundwater Samples

Table 5a

Page 1 of 1

Dissolved Metals Analyses

Feasibility Study

Glen Pump Station Abandonment

R615-0685-01

September 2015



Hardness mg/L 5 369 92 571 NC NC

Aluminum 50 <50 <50 <50 50,000 50,000

Antimony 1 <1 <1 <1 NC NC

Arsenic 5 <5 <5 <5 1,000 1,000

Barium 50 90 <50 740 5,000 NC

Beryllium 1 <1 <1 <1 NC NC

Boron 40 50 80 390 50,000 50,000

Cadmium 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 200 200

Calcium 2000 131,000 25,200 198,000 NC NC

Chromium 5 <5 <5 <5 4,000 4,000

Cobalt 0.5 1 <0.5 3 5,000 5,000

Copper 2 <2 <2 <2 2,000 2,000

Iron 100 950 <100 42,600 10,000 10,000

Lead 1 <1 <1 <1 1,000 1,000

Lithium 1 <1 2 14 NC NC

Magnesium 100 10,300 7,100 18,600 NC NC

Manganese 2 855 53 1,750 5,000 5,000

Mercury 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 50 50

Molybdenum 1 1 5 1 1,000 1,000

Nickel 2 <2 <2 2 2,000 2,000

Selenium 5 <5 <5 <5 NC NC

Silver 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1,000 1,000

Sodium 200 55,900 149,000 51,600 NC NC

Strontium 10 650 240 1,690 NC NC

Thallium 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 NC NC

Titanium 50 <50 <50 <50 NC NC

Uranium 0.2 0 0 1 NC NC

Vanadium 10 <10 <10 <10 NC NC

Zinc 40 <40 <40 <40 3,000 3,000

NOTES

Results and standards in µg/L or parts per billion (ppb) unless otherwise stated

"<" - Sample concentration is below Reported Detection Limit

NC indicates that no maximum concentration limit was provided

BOLD Sample concentration exceed applicable CoV and/or MetroVancouver Bylaw Limits

Table 5bResults of Groundwater Samples

Dissolved Metals AnalysesPage 1 of 1

City of Vancouver

Sewer and

Watercourse Bylaw

(Table 1)

Metro Vancouver

Sewerage and

Drainage Bylaw

(Schedule B)


R615-0685-01September 2015

PARAMETERS RDL 15-MW1 15-MW2

Sample Date 07-Aug-15 08-Aug-15

EPHw (10-19) 100 440 190 5000 NGEPHw (19-32) 100 551 <100 NS NGLEPHw 100 440 190 NS NGHEPHw 100 551 <100 NS NGVHw (6-10) 100 <100 <100 15000 NGVPHw 100 <100 <100 NS NGBenzene* 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 5 100Ethylbenzene* 1 <1.0 <1.0 2.4 NGToluene* 1 <1.0 <1.0 24 NGXylenes (total)* 2 <2.0 <2.0 300 NGMTBE 1 <1.0 <1.0 15 NG

NOTES

Results and standards in µg/L or parts per billion (ppb) unless otherwise statedRDL - Reported Detection Limit"<" - Sample concentration is below Reported Detection Limit"-" - Not analyzed / cannot be calculatedNS indicates that no standard applies1 - CSR Schedule 6, Generic Numerical Water Standards unless otherwise noted (most stringent Standard applies)2 - CSR Schedule 10, Generic Numerical Water Standards* - Total BETX concentration not to exceed 1 mg/L as per MetroVancouver Sewer Use Bylaw


BOLD Sample concentration is greater than laboratory detection limits

Metro Vancouver

Sewerage and

Drainage Bylaw

(Schedule B)

CSR DRINKING

WATER STANDARDS

(1)

Table 6

Page 1 of 1

LEPH/HEPH & BTEX/VPH Analyses



R615-0685-01September 2015



Acenaphthene 0.05 <0.05 0.09 NS 50Acenaphthylene 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS 50Acridine 0.1 <0.09 <0.10 NS NGAnthracene 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS 50Benzo (a) anthracene 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS 50Benzo (a) pyrene 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 50Benzo (b) fluoranthene 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS 50Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS 50Benzo (k) fluoranthene 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS 50Chrysene 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS 50Dibenz (a,h) anthracene 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS 50Fluoranthene 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS 50Fluorene 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS 50Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 NS 50Naphthalene 0.3 <0.30 <0.30 NS 50Phenanthrene 0.1 <0.10 <0.10 NS 50Pyrene 0.1 <0.09 <0.10 NS 50Quinoline 0.1 <0.10 <0.10 NS NG

NOTES

Results and standards in µg/L or parts per billion (ppb) unless otherwise statedRDL - Reported Detection Limit"<" - Sample concentration is below Reported Detection Limit"-" - Not analyzed / cannot be calculatedNS indicates that no standard applies1 - CSR Schedule 6, Generic Numerical Water Standards unless otherwise noted (most stringent Standard applies)2 - CSR Schedule 10, Generic Numerical Water Standards


Table 7

Page 1 of 1

PAH Analyses


CSR DRINKING

WATER STANDARDS

(1)

Metro Vancouver

Sewerage and

Drainage Bylaw

(Schedule B)


R615-0685-01September 2015


CSR DRINKING

WATER STANDARDS

(1)


Benzene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 5

Bromodichloromethane 1 <1.0 <1.0 16Bromoform 1 <1.0 <1.0 100

Carbon tetrachloride 1 <1.0 <1.0 5Chlorobenzene 1 <1.0 <1.0 30

Chloroethane 2 <2.0 <2.0 46 (2)

Chloroform 1 <1.0 <1.0 100Dibromochloromethane 1 <1.0 <1.0 1001,2-Dibromoethane 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.34 (2)Dibromomethane 1 <1.0 <1.0 370 (2)

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 31,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 <1.0 <1.0 NS1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 <1.0 <1.0 11,1-Dichloroethane 1 <1.0 <1.0 NS1,2-Dichloroethane 1 <1.0 <1.0 51,1-Dichloroethene 1 <1.0 <1.0 14cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 <1.0 <1.0 370 (2)trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 <1.0 <1.0 730 (2)

1,2-Dichloropropane 1 <1.0 <1.0 9.9 (2)

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 <1.0 <1.0 6.7 (2)trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 <1.0 <1.0 6.7 (2)Ethylbenzene 1 <1.0 <1.0 2.4Methyl tert-butyl ether 1 <1.0 <1.0 15Methylene chloride 3 <3.0 <3.0 50Styrene 1 <1.0 <1.0 NS1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 <1.0 <1.0 3.4 (2)

Tetrachloroethene 1 <1.0 <1.0 30

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 <1.0 <1.0 10,000 (2)Toluene 1 <1.0 <1.0 24

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 <1.0 <1.0 12 (2)

Trichloroethene 1 <1.0 <1.0 5Trichlorofluoromethane 1 <1.0 <1.0 11,000 (2)Vinyl chloride 2 <2.0 <2.0 2

Xylenes (total) 2 <2.0 <2.0 300

NOTES

Results and standards in µg/L or parts per billion (ppb) unless otherwise statedRDL - Reported Detection Limit"<" - Sample concentration is below Reported Detection Limit"-" - Not analyzed / cannot be calculatedNS indicates that no standard applies1 - CSR Schedule 6, Generic Numerical Water Standards unless otherwise noted (most stringent Standard applies)2 - CSR Schedule 10, Generic Numerical Water Standards


Table 8

Page 1 of 1

VOC Analyses



R615-0685-01September 2015


MetroVan Sewer Use

Guidelines

CSR DRINKING

WATER

STANDARDS (1)


Oil & Grease 2 <2 <2 <2 150 NS

Total Suspended Solids 2 12 192 25 600 NS

NOTES

Results and standards in mg/LRDL - Reported Detection Limit"<" - Sample concentration is below Reported Detection Limit"-" - Not analyzed / cannot be calculatedNS indicates that no standard applies


BOLD Sample concentration detectable

Table 9

Page 1 of 1

Other Parameter Analyses


Appendix E: Chain of Custody Forms

Appendix F: Laboratory Certificates

REPORTED TO Levelton Consultants Ltd. - Hazmat Surrey

Surrey, BC V3S 8E5

TEL

FAX

ATTENTION WORK ORDER

General Comments:

CARO Analytical Services employs methods which are conducted according to procedures accepted by appropriate

regulatory agencies, and/or are conducted in accordance with recognized professional standards using accepted testing

methodologies and quality control efforts, except where otherwise agreed to by the client.

The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the Chain of Custody or Sample Requisition

document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. CARO is not responsible for any loss or damage

resulting directly or indirectly from error or omission in the conduct of testing. Liability is limited to the cost of analysis .

Samples will be disposed of 30 days after the test report has been issued unless otherwise agreed to in writing.

Authorized By:

#110 4011 Viking Way #102 3677 Highway 97N 17225 109 Avenue

Richmond, BC V6V 2K9 Kelowna, BC V1X 5C3 Edmonton, AB T5S 1H7

Tel: 604-279-1499 Fax: 604-279-1599 Tel: 250-765-9646 Fax: 250-765-3893 Tel: 780-489-9100 Fax: 780-489-9700

www.caro.ca

Locations:

5080419

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact your Account Manager:

Bryan Shaw, Ph.D. ([email protected])

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

PO NUMBER RECEIVED / TEMP Aug-06-15 14:45 / 8°C

PROJECT REPORTED Aug-13-15

PROJECT INFO COC NUMBER 21788

R615-0685-01

#301 - 19292 - 60th Avenue (604) 533-2992

(604) 533-0768

Jason Tung

R615-0685-01

CoV GNW

Division Manager, Richmond

Brent Coates, B.Sc.

Page 1 of 21CARO Analytical ServicesRev 2015-07-07 Page 1 of 21

REPORTED TO

PROJECT

Levelton Consultants Ltd. - Hazmat Surrey WORK ORDER

REPORTED Aug-13-15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

R615-0685-01

5080419

Analysis Information Page 3

Analysis Descriptions, Method References, Glossary of Terms

Sample Analytical Data Page 4

Test Results, Reporting Limits, Analysis Dates, Sample & Analysis Notes

Quality Control Data Appendix 1

Method Blanks, Duplicates, Spikes, Reference Materials

Analytical Summary Appendix 2

Tabulated data in condensed format to assist with comparisons


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15

ANALYSIS INFORMATION

R615-0685-01

5080419

Technique LocationAnalysis Description Method Reference

EPH in Soil EPA 3570* / BCMOE

EPHs

Shaker Extraction (Hexane-Acetone 1:1) / Gas

Chromatography (GC-FID)

Richmond

L/HEPH BCMOE L/HEPH Calculation N/A

Moisture ASTM D2974-87* Gravimetry (Dried at 105C) N/A

PAH in Soil EPA 3570* / EPA

8270D

Shaker Extraction (Hexane-Acetone 1:1) / GC-MS

(SIM)

Richmond

pH in Soil (1:2 Soil/Water) Carter 16.2 / APHA

4500-H+ B

1:2 Soil/Water Slurry / Electrometry Richmond

Strong Acid Leachable Metals BCMOE SALM V.2 /

EPA 6020A

HNO3+HCl Hot Block Digestion / Inductively Coupled

Plasma-Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS)

Richmond

VH in Soil EPA 5035A/5030B /

BCMOE VHs

Methanol Extract, Purge&Trap / Purge&Trap or

Headspace, Gas Chromatography (GC-FID)

Richmond

VOC in Soil EPA 5035A/5030B /

EPA 8260B

Methanol Extract, Purge&Trap / GC-MS (SIM) Richmond

VPHs BCMOE VPH Calculation (VH - BTEX - Styrene) N/A

Note: An asterisk in the Method Reference indicates that the CARO method has been modified from the reference method

Method Reference Descriptions:

APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd Edition, American Public Health

Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation

ASTM ASTM International Test Methods

BCMOE British Columbia Environmental Laboratory Manual, 2013, British Columbia Ministry of Environment

EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Test Methods

Glossary of Terms:

MRL Method Reporting Limit

Less than the Reported Detection Limit (RDL) - the RDL may be higher than the MRL due to various factors such

as dilutions, limited sample volume, high moisture, or interferences

<

Percent (wet weight)% wet

Milligrams per kilogram (dry weight)mg/kg dry

pH < 7 = acidic, ph > 7 = basicpH units


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15

SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA

R615-0685-01

5080419

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits

Units Prepared Analyzed Notes

Sample ID: [email protected] (5080419-02) [Soil] Sampled: Aug-05-15 08:30

General Parameters

pH units8.0pH (1:2 H2O Solution) Aug-12-150.1 Aug-12-15

Strong Acid Leachable Metals

mg/kg dry< 0.1Antimony Aug-13-150.1 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry0.5Arsenic Aug-13-150.4 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry33Barium Aug-13-151 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry< 0.1Beryllium Aug-13-150.1 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry< 2Boron Aug-13-152 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry< 0.04Cadmium Aug-13-150.04 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry7.1Chromium Aug-13-151.0 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry4.2Cobalt Aug-13-150.1 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry13.3Copper Aug-13-150.2 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry1.8Lead Aug-13-150.2 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry2.6Lithium Aug-13-150.1 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry157Manganese Aug-13-150.4 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry< 0.05Mercury Aug-13-150.05 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry0.1Molybdenum Aug-13-150.1 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry7.2Nickel Aug-13-150.4 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry< 0.5Selenium Aug-13-150.5 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry< 0.2Silver Aug-13-150.2 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry23.4Strontium Aug-13-150.2 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry< 0.1Thallium Aug-13-150.1 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry0.9Tin Aug-13-150.2 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry0.1Uranium Aug-13-150.1 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry28.8Vanadium Aug-13-150.4 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry23Zinc Aug-13-152 Aug-12-15


General Parameters



mg/kg dry0.2Antimony Aug-13-150.1 Aug-12-15



mg/kg dry< 0.1Beryllium Aug-13-150.1 Aug-12-15











REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits


Sample ID: [email protected] (5080419-03) [Soil] Sampled: Aug-05-15 08:30, Continued

Strong Acid Leachable Metals, Continued












General Parameters



mg/kg dry< 0.1Antimony Aug-13-150.1 Aug-12-15



mg/kg dry0.3Beryllium Aug-13-150.1 Aug-12-15





















General Parameters



REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits








mg/kg dry3Boron Aug-13-152 Aug-12-15

mg/kg dry0.15Cadmium Aug-13-150.04 Aug-12-15



















General Parameters




















REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits












General Parameters




















mg/kg dry117Strontium Aug-13-150.2 Aug-12-15




mg/kg dry118Vanadium Aug-13-150.4 Aug-12-15



General Parameters

% wet45.3Moisture Aug-12-150.1 N/A





REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits















mg/kg dry0.67Mercury Aug-13-150.05 Aug-12-15




mg/kg dry0.6Silver Aug-13-150.2 Aug-12-15







BCMOE Aggregate Hydrocarbons

mg/kg dry76VHs (6-10) Aug-11-1520 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry75VPHs N/A20 N/A

mg/kg dry< 60EPHs10-19 Aug-12-1550 Aug-10-15 RS3

mg/kg dry220EPHs19-32 Aug-12-1550 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry< 60LEPHs N/A60 N/A

mg/kg dry220HEPHs N/A50 N/A

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH)

mg/kg dry< 0.10Acenaphthene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.10Acenaphthylene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.15Anthracene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.32Benz (a) anthracene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.26Benzo (a) pyrene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.45Benzo (b) fluoranthene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.23Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.35Benzo (k) fluoranthene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.45Chrysene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry< 0.10Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.90Fluoranthene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry< 0.10Fluorene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.18Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.16Naphthalene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits



Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Continued

mg/kg dry0.40Phenanthrene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

mg/kg dry0.89Pyrene Aug-12-150.10 Aug-10-15

Aug-12-15108 72-117Surrogate: Naphthalene-d8 Aug-10-15%

Aug-12-1591 74-111Surrogate: Acenaphthene-d10 Aug-10-15%

Aug-12-1572 60-106Surrogate: Phenanthrene-d10 Aug-10-15%

Aug-12-1588 60-125Surrogate: Chrysene-d12 Aug-10-15%

Aug-12-1590 60-121Surrogate: Perylene-d12 Aug-10-15%

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) RS2, RS3

mg/kg dry< 0.04Benzene Aug-11-150.02 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.27Bromodichloromethane Aug-11-150.10 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.27Bromoform Aug-11-150.10 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.13Carbon tetrachloride Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.13Chlorobenzene Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.19Chloroform Aug-11-150.07 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.27Dibromochloromethane Aug-11-150.10 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.271,2-Dibromoethane Aug-11-150.10 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.27Dibromomethane Aug-11-150.10 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.131,2-Dichlorobenzene Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.131,3-Dichlorobenzene Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.171,4-Dichlorobenzene Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15 RA1

mg/kg dry< 0.131,1-Dichloroethane Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.131,2-Dichloroethane Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.131,1-Dichloroethene Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.27cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Aug-11-150.10 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.13trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.131,2-Dichloropropane Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.13cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.13trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.13Ethylbenzene Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.11Methyl tert-butyl ether Aug-11-150.04 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 1.33Methylene chloride Aug-11-150.50 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.13Styrene Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.131,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.13Tetrachloroethene Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.53Toluene Aug-11-150.20 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.131,1,1-Trichloroethane Aug-11-150.05 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.191,1,2-Trichloroethane Aug-11-150.07 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.03Trichloroethene Aug-11-150.01 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.27Trichlorofluoromethane Aug-11-150.10 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry< 0.27Vinyl chloride Aug-11-150.10 Aug-05-15

mg/kg dry0.27Xylenes (total) Aug-11-150.10 Aug-05-15

Aug-11-1587 60-140Surrogate: Toluene-d8 Aug-05-15%

Aug-11-1572 60-140Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Aug-05-15%

Aug-11-1596 60-140Surrogate: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 Aug-05-15%


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits



General Parameters















mg/kg dry0.08Mercury Aug-13-150.05 Aug-12-15











Sample / Analysis Qualifiers:

RA1 The Reported Detection Limit (RDL) has been raised due to matrix interference.

RS2 Reported Detection Limits (RDL) for this sample have been raised due to limited sample volume.

RS3 Reported Detection Limits (RDL) for this sample have been raised due to high moisture and/or organic

content.


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15

APPENDIX 1: QUALITY CONTROL DATA

R615-0685-01

5080419

The following section displays the quality control (QC) data that is associated with your sample data. Groups of samples are prepared

in �batches� and analyzed in conjunction with QC samples that ensure your data is of the highest quality. Common QC types include:

� Method Blank (Blk): Laboratory reagent water is carried through sample preparation and analysis steps. Method Blanks indicate

that results are free from contamination, i.e. not biased high from sources such as the sample container or the laboratory

environment

� Duplicate (Dup): Preparation and analysis of a replicate aliquot of a sample. Duplicates provide a measure of the analytical

method�s precision, i.e. how reproducible a result is. Duplicates are only reported if they are associated with your sample data.

� Blank Spike (BS): A known amount of standard is carried through sample preparation and analysis steps. Blank Spikes, also

known as laboratory control samples (LCS), are prepared from a different source of standard than used for the calibration. They

ensure that the calibration is acceptable (i.e. not biased high or low) and also provide a measure of the analytical method�s

accuracy (i.e. closeness of the result to a target value).

� Standard Reference Material (SRM): A material of similar matrix to the samples, externally certified for the parameter(s) listed.

Standard Reference Materials ensure that the preparation steps in the method are adequate to achieve acceptable recoveries of

the parameter(s) tested.

Each QC type is analyzed at a 5-10% frequency, i.e. one blank/duplicate/spike for every 10 samples. For all types of QC, the specified

recovery (% Rec) and relative percent difference (RPD) limits are derived from long-term method performance averages and/or

prescribed by the reference method.

Analyte Result MRL UnitsSpike

Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes

BCMOE Aggregate Hydrocarbons, Batch B5H0387

Blank (B5H0387-BLK1) Prepared: Aug-10-15, Analyzed: Aug-11-15

mg/kg wetVHs (6-10) < 20 20


mg/kg wetVHs (6-10) < 20 20

LCS (B5H0387-BS2) Prepared: Aug-10-15, Analyzed: Aug-12-15

70-13074371mg/kg wetVHs (6-10) 280 20


70-13077371mg/kg wetVHs (6-10) 290 20

Duplicate (B5H0387-DUP1) Prepared: Aug-05-15, Analyzed: Aug-11-15Source: 5080419-20

mg/kg dryVHs (6-10) 7667 3120



mg/kg wetEPHs10-19 < 50 50

mg/kg wet< 50EPHs19-32 50

Reference (B5H0399-SRM2) Prepared: Aug-10-15, Analyzed: Aug-12-15

65-1301053020mg/kg wetEPHs10-19 3200 50

mg/kg wet 4330 65-1301144900EPHs19-32 50

General Parameters, Batch B5H0525


95-1051006.26pH unitspH (1:2 H2O Solution) 6.3 0.1

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Batch B5H0399


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Batch B5H0399, Continued


mg/kg wetAcenaphthene < 0.10 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Acenaphthylene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Anthracene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Benz (a) anthracene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Benzo (a) pyrene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Benzo (b) fluoranthene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Benzo (k) fluoranthene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Chrysene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Dibenz (a,h) anthracene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Fluoranthene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Fluorene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Naphthalene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Phenanthrene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Pyrene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 72-117Surrogate: Naphthalene-d8 1061.77

mg/kg wet 1.67 74-111Surrogate: Acenaphthene-d10 1001.66

mg/kg wet 1.67 60-106Surrogate: Phenanthrene-d10 1041.73

mg/kg wet 1.67 60-125Surrogate: Chrysene-d12 1051.74

mg/kg wet 1.67 60-121Surrogate: Perylene-d12 1051.75


70-1151021.67mg/kg wetAcenaphthene 1.69 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 70-114781.31Acenaphthylene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 70-110901.50Anthracene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 66-114741.24Benz (a) anthracene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 62-122951.58Benzo (a) pyrene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 54-121841.40Benzo (b) fluoranthene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 64-117781.30Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 69-119991.64Benzo (k) fluoranthene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 67-1201111.85Chrysene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 63-115761.27Dibenz (a,h) anthracene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 72-112861.43Fluoranthene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 70-108901.50Fluorene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 65-118851.42Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 70-115991.64Naphthalene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 70-111731.21Phenanthrene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.67 73-112941.56Pyrene 0.10







60-140930.130mg/kg wetAcenaphthene < 0.14 0.10

mg/kg wet 0.310 70-1301070.33Anthracene 0.10

mg/kg wet 3.51 70-130772.70Benz (a) anthracene 0.10

mg/kg wet 0.201 70-1301280.26Benzo (a) pyrene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.40 70-1301021.43Benzo (b) fluoranthene 0.10

mg/kg wet 4.99 70-130763.79Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 0.10

mg/kg wet 3.68 70-1301033.78Benzo (k) fluoranthene 0.10

mg/kg wet 7.62 70-1301098.30Chrysene 0.10

mg/kg wet 4.80 70-130904.34Dibenz (a,h) anthracene 0.10

mg/kg wet 3.87 70-130973.75Fluoranthene 0.10


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes


Reference (B5H0399-SRM1), Continued Prepared: Aug-10-15, Analyzed: Aug-12-15

mg/kg wet 5.67 70-130764.29Fluorene 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.22 70-1301102.43Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.20 60-1401281.54Naphthalene 0.10

mg/kg wet 1.90 70-130951.80Phenanthrene 0.10

mg/kg wet 0.670 70-130790.53Pyrene 0.10






Strong Acid Leachable Metals, Batch B5H0516


mg/kg dryAntimony < 0.1 0.1

mg/kg dry< 0.4Arsenic 0.4

mg/kg dry< 1Barium 1

mg/kg dry< 0.1Beryllium 0.1

mg/kg dry< 2Boron 2

mg/kg dry< 0.04Cadmium 0.04

mg/kg dry< 1.0Chromium 1.0

mg/kg dry< 0.1Cobalt 0.1

mg/kg dry< 0.2Copper 0.2

mg/kg dry< 0.2Lead 0.2

mg/kg dry< 0.1Lithium 0.1

mg/kg dry< 0.4Manganese 0.4

mg/kg dry< 0.05Mercury 0.05

mg/kg dry< 0.1Molybdenum 0.1

mg/kg dry< 0.4Nickel 0.4

mg/kg dry< 0.5Selenium 0.5

mg/kg dry< 0.2Silver 0.2

mg/kg dry< 0.2Strontium 0.2

mg/kg dry< 0.1Thallium 0.1

mg/kg dry< 0.2Tin 0.2

mg/kg dry< 0.1Uranium 0.1

mg/kg dry< 0.4Vanadium 0.4

mg/kg dry< 2Zinc 2


mg/kg dryAntimony < 0.10.1 600.1

mg/kg dry1.6 1.6Arsenic 420.4

mg/kg dry 251 52Barium 381

mg/kg dry0.2 0.3Beryllium 370.1

mg/kg dry< 2 < 2Boron 292

mg/kg dry0.04 0.04Cadmium 320.04

mg/kg dry 311.6 11.3Chromium 321.0

mg/kg dry 47.4 7.1Cobalt 260.1

mg/kg dry < 114.9 14.8Copper 380.2

mg/kg dry 13.0 2.9Lead 460.2

mg/kg dry 27.1 6.9Lithium 280.1

mg/kg dry 1306 302Manganese 230.4

mg/kg dry< 0.05 < 0.05Mercury 420.05

mg/kg dry0.4 0.4Molybdenum 520.1

mg/kg dry < 16.4 6.5Nickel 290.4

mg/kg dry< 0.5 < 0.5Selenium 190.5

mg/kg dry< 0.2 < 0.2Silver 350.2


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes

Strong Acid Leachable Metals, Batch B5H0516, Continued

Duplicate (B5H0516-DUP1), Continued Prepared: Aug-12-15, Analyzed: Aug-13-15Source: 5080419-09

mg/kg dry 1019.1 21.1Strontium 250.2

mg/kg dry< 0.1 < 0.1Thallium 270.1

mg/kg dry0.3 0.3Tin 850.2

mg/kg dry0.3 0.3Uranium 360.1

mg/kg dry < 141.0 41.1Vanadium 230.4

mg/kg dry < 145 45Zinc 302


73-1381036.27mg/kg dryAntimony 6.4 0.1

mg/kg dry 15.4 87-1069614.8Arsenic 0.4

mg/kg dry 80.6 72-11910484Barium 1

mg/kg dry 0.544 73-128970.5Beryllium 0.1

mg/kg dry 2.68 58-1391364Boron 2

mg/kg dry 0.230 88-121950.22Cadmium 0.04

mg/kg dry 27.2 91-11310127.4Chromium 1.0

mg/kg dry 12.5 90-1099912.3Cobalt 0.1

mg/kg dry 44.9 92-1129944.3Copper 0.2

mg/kg dry 14.4 89-1119313.4Lead 0.2

mg/kg dry 9.26 73-12412011.1Lithium 0.1

mg/kg dry 1100 93-112971070Manganese 0.4

mg/kg dry 0.0980 74-1261050.10Mercury 0.05

mg/kg dry 0.738 93-120980.7Molybdenum 0.1

mg/kg dry 17.4 93-11010017.5Nickel 0.4

mg/kg dry 11.6 85-11610512.1Strontium 0.2

mg/kg dry 1.10 78-120991.1Tin 0.2

mg/kg dry 0.940 80-1021021.0Uranium 0.1

mg/kg dry 54.9 87-11610256.1Vanadium 0.4

mg/kg dry 67.5 91-11310168Zinc 2

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Batch B5H0387


mg/kg wetBenzene < 0.02 0.02

mg/kg wet< 0.10Bromodichloromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Bromoform 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.05Carbon tetrachloride 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.05Chlorobenzene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.07Chloroform 0.07

mg/kg wet< 0.10Dibromochloromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.101,2-Dibromoethane 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Dibromomethane 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.05



mg/kg wet< 0.051,1-Dichloroethane 0.05


mg/kg wet< 0.051,1-Dichloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.10cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.05trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.051,2-Dichloropropane 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.05cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.05trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.05Ethylbenzene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.04Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.04

mg/kg wet< 0.50Methylene chloride 0.50

mg/kg wet< 0.05Styrene 0.05


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Batch B5H0387, Continued

Blank (B5H0387-BLK1), Continued Prepared: Aug-10-15, Analyzed: Aug-11-15

mg/kg wet< 0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.05Tetrachloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.20Toluene 0.20

mg/kg wet< 0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.05


mg/kg wet< 0.01Trichloroethene 0.01

mg/kg wet< 0.10Trichlorofluoromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Vinyl chloride 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Xylenes (total) 0.10

mg/kg wet 10.0 60-140Surrogate: Toluene-d8 898.92

mg/kg wet 12.6 60-140Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 789.77

mg/kg wet 10.0 60-140Surrogate: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 898.86


mg/kg wetBenzene < 0.02 0.02

mg/kg wet< 0.10Bromodichloromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Bromoform 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.05Carbon tetrachloride 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.05Chlorobenzene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.07Chloroform 0.07

mg/kg wet< 0.10Dibromochloromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.101,2-Dibromoethane 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Dibromomethane 0.10






mg/kg wet< 0.051,1-Dichloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.10cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.05trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.051,2-Dichloropropane 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.05cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.05trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.05Ethylbenzene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.04Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.04

mg/kg wet< 0.50Methylene chloride 0.50

mg/kg wet< 0.05Styrene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.05Tetrachloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet< 0.20Toluene 0.20



mg/kg wet< 0.01Trichloroethene 0.01

mg/kg wet< 0.10Trichlorofluoromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Vinyl chloride 0.10

mg/kg wet< 0.10Xylenes (total) 0.10





70-1301002.00mg/kg wetBenzene 2.00 0.02

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130881.76Bromodichloromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130841.67Bromoform 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130861.72Carbon tetrachloride 0.05


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes


LCS (B5H0387-BS1), Continued Prepared: Aug-10-15, Analyzed: Aug-11-15

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301052.10Chlorobenzene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301012.02Chloroform 0.07

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130801.61Dibromochloromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130801.611,2-Dibromoethane 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130861.72Dibromomethane 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301092.181,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.05



mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301002.001,1-Dichloroethane 0.05


mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301012.021,1-Dichloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130851.70cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130891.79trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130891.791,2-Dichloropropane 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 60-140671.33cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 60-140671.34trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301062.13Ethylbenzene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130731.46Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.04

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301001.99Methylene chloride 0.50

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130991.99Styrene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130981.971,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301001.99Tetrachloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301042.09Toluene 0.20

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130951.911,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.05


mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130981.97Trichloroethene 0.01

mg/kg wet 2.00 SPK170-130280.56Trichlorofluoromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130831.66Vinyl chloride 0.10

mg/kg wet 6.00 70-1301005.99Xylenes (total) 0.10





70-1301052.00mg/kg wetBenzene 2.10 0.02

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130941.87Bromodichloromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130901.81Bromoform 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130891.78Carbon tetrachloride 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301102.19Chlorobenzene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301062.13Chloroform 0.07

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130871.75Dibromochloromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130891.781,2-Dibromoethane 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130941.88Dibromomethane 0.10






mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130971.941,1-Dichloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130941.89cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130941.89trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130961.911,2-Dichloropropane 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 60-140721.44cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 60-140721.44trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301102.20Ethylbenzene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130831.66Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.04


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes



mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301062.12Methylene chloride 0.50

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301052.11Styrene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301062.121,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301142.27Tetrachloroethene 0.05

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301102.20Toluene 0.20



mg/kg wet 2.00 70-1301042.07Trichloroethene 0.01

mg/kg wet 2.00 SPK170-130400.80Trichlorofluoromethane 0.10

mg/kg wet 2.00 70-130811.62Vinyl chloride 0.10

mg/kg wet 6.00 70-1301056.32Xylenes (total) 0.10




Duplicate (B5H0387-DUP1) RS2, RS3 Prepared: Aug-05-15, Analyzed: Aug-11-15Source: 5080419-20

mg/kg dryBenzene < 0.040.04 400.02

mg/kg dry< 0.18 < 0.27Bromodichloromethane 400.10

mg/kg dry< 0.18 < 0.27Bromoform 400.10

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.13Carbon tetrachloride 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.13Chlorobenzene 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.13 < 0.19Chloroform 400.07

mg/kg dry< 0.18 < 0.27Dibromochloromethane 400.10

mg/kg dry< 0.18 < 0.271,2-Dibromoethane 400.10

mg/kg dry< 0.18 < 0.27Dibromomethane 400.10

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.131,2-Dichlorobenzene 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.131,3-Dichlorobenzene 400.05

mg/kg dry RA1< 0.17 < 0.171,4-Dichlorobenzene 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.131,1-Dichloroethane 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.131,2-Dichloroethane 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.131,1-Dichloroethene 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.18 < 0.27cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 400.10

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.13trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.131,2-Dichloropropane 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.13cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.13trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 400.05

mg/kg dry0.09 < 0.13Ethylbenzene 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.07 < 0.11Methyl tert-butyl ether 400.04

mg/kg dry< 0.91 < 1.33Methylene chloride 400.50

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.13Styrene 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.131,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.13Tetrachloroethene 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.37 < 0.53Toluene 400.20

mg/kg dry< 0.09 < 0.131,1,1-Trichloroethane 400.05

mg/kg dry< 0.13 < 0.191,1,2-Trichloroethane 400.07

mg/kg dry< 0.02 < 0.03Trichloroethene 400.01

mg/kg dry< 0.18 < 0.27Trichlorofluoromethane 400.10

mg/kg dry< 0.18 < 0.27Vinyl chloride 400.10

mg/kg dry0.32 0.27Xylenes (total) 400.10

mg/kg dry 18.3 60-140Surrogate: Toluene-d8 9517.3

mg/kg dry 23.0 60-140Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 7817.9

mg/kg dry 18.3 60-140Surrogate: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 10218.7


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419

QC Qualifiers:

RA1 The Reported Detection Limit (RDL) has been raised due to matrix interference.

RS2 Reported Detection Limits (RDL) for this sample have been raised due to limited sample volume.

RS3 Reported Detection Limits (RDL) for this sample have been raised due to high moisture and/or organic

content.

S02 Surrogate recovery outside of control limits. Data accepted based on acceptable recovery of other surrogates.

SPK1 The recovery of this analyte was outside of established control limits. The data was accepted based on

performance of other batch QC.


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15

APPENDIX 2: ANALYTICAL SUMMARY

R615-0685-01

5080419

5080419-02 5080419-03 5080419-09 5080419-10 5080419-16 5080419-17

Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Aug-05-15 Aug-05-15 Aug-05-15 Aug-05-15 Aug-05-15 Aug-05-15

[email protected]

m

[email protected]

m

[email protected]

m

[email protected]

m

[email protected] [email protected]

General Parameters pH (1:2 H2O Solution) (pH units) 8.0 6.6 7.4 7.6 6.9 8.7

Strong Acid Leachable

Metals

Antimony (mg/kg dry) < 0.1 0.2 < 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2

Arsenic (mg/kg dry) 0.5 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.9 2.4

Barium (mg/kg dry) 33 38 52 76 67 44

Beryllium (mg/kg dry) < 0.1 < 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3

Boron (mg/kg dry) < 2 < 2 < 2 3 < 2 < 2

Cadmium (mg/kg dry) < 0.04 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.15 0.11 0.09

Chromium (mg/kg dry) 7.1 8.2 11.3 19.6 47.5 49.8

Cobalt (mg/kg dry) 4.2 4.0 7.1 14.8 18.0 22.2

Copper (mg/kg dry) 13.3 12.2 14.8 46.0 32.3 37.3

Lead (mg/kg dry) 1.8 6.3 2.9 8.3 8.5 3.1

Lithium (mg/kg dry) 2.6 4.3 6.9 12.9 8.3 16.3

Manganese (mg/kg dry) 157 281 302 473 460 626

Mercury (mg/kg dry) < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Molybdenum (mg/kg dry) 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 0.4 0.6

Nickel (mg/kg dry) 7.2 5.9 6.5 15.3 45.5 44.0

Selenium (mg/kg dry) < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Silver (mg/kg dry) < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2

Strontium (mg/kg dry) 23.4 21.1 21.1 35.9 94.8 117

Thallium (mg/kg dry) < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Tin (mg/kg dry) 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.6

Uranium (mg/kg dry) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.3

Vanadium (mg/kg dry) 28.8 40.0 41.1 63.3 93.2 118

Zinc (mg/kg dry) 23 28 45 87 60 65


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419

5080419-20 5080419-21

Soil Soil

Aug-05-15 Aug-05-15

[email protected]

m

[email protected]

m

General Parameters Moisture (% wet) 45.3

pH (1:2 H2O Solution) (pH units) 7.0 6.0

Strong Acid Leachable

Metals

Antimony (mg/kg dry) 1.5 0.6

Arsenic (mg/kg dry) 3.9 4.4

Barium (mg/kg dry) 215 82

Beryllium (mg/kg dry) 0.3 0.3

Boron (mg/kg dry) 16 9

Cadmium (mg/kg dry) 0.37 0.09

Chromium (mg/kg dry) 21.3 28.1

Cobalt (mg/kg dry) 8.1 7.5

Copper (mg/kg dry) 43.5 37.9

Lead (mg/kg dry) 93.3 21.4

Lithium (mg/kg dry) 8.8 14.9

Manganese (mg/kg dry) 308 236

Mercury (mg/kg dry) 0.67 0.08

Molybdenum (mg/kg dry) 1.3 2.8

Nickel (mg/kg dry) 16.2 17.5

Selenium (mg/kg dry) < 0.5 < 0.5

Silver (mg/kg dry) 0.6 < 0.2

Strontium (mg/kg dry) 80.4 43.5

Thallium (mg/kg dry) < 0.1 < 0.1

Tin (mg/kg dry) 37.0 22.3

Uranium (mg/kg dry) 0.5 2.1

Vanadium (mg/kg dry) 44.4 51.6

Zinc (mg/kg dry) 185 56

BCMOE Aggregate

Hydrocarbons

VHs (6-10) (mg/kg dry) 76

VPHs (mg/kg dry) 75

EPHs10-19 (mg/kg dry) < 60

EPHs19-32 (mg/kg dry) 220

LEPHs (mg/kg dry) < 60

HEPHs (mg/kg dry) 220

Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH)

Acenaphthene (mg/kg dry) < 0.10

Acenaphthylene (mg/kg dry) 0.10

Anthracene (mg/kg dry) 0.15

Benz (a) anthracene (mg/kg dry) 0.32

Benzo (a) pyrene (mg/kg dry) 0.26

Benzo (b) fluoranthene (mg/kg dry) 0.45

Benzo (g,h,i) perylene (mg/kg dry) 0.23

Benzo (k) fluoranthene (mg/kg dry) 0.35

Chrysene (mg/kg dry) 0.45

Dibenz (a,h) anthracene (mg/kg dry) < 0.10

Fluoranthene (mg/kg dry) 0.90

Fluorene (mg/kg dry) < 0.10

Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene (mg/kg dry) 0.18


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-13-15


R615-0685-01

5080419

5080419-20 5080419-21

Soil Soil

Aug-05-15 Aug-05-15

[email protected]

m

[email protected]

m

Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH)

Naphthalene (mg/kg dry) 0.16

Phenanthrene (mg/kg dry) 0.40

Pyrene (mg/kg dry) 0.89

Sur: Naphthalene-d8 (%) 108

Sur: Acenaphthene-d10 (%) 91

Sur: Phenanthrene-d10 (%) 72

Sur: Chrysene-d12 (%) 88

Sur: Perylene-d12 (%) 90

Volatile Organic

Compounds (VOC)

Benzene (mg/kg dry) < 0.04

Bromodichloromethane (mg/kg dry) < 0.27

Bromoform (mg/kg dry) < 0.27

Carbon tetrachloride (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

Chlorobenzene (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

Chloroform (mg/kg dry) < 0.19

Dibromochloromethane (mg/kg dry) < 0.27

1,2-Dibromoethane (mg/kg dry) < 0.27

Dibromomethane (mg/kg dry) < 0.27

1,2-Dichlorobenzene (mg/kg dry) < 0.13



1,1-Dichloroethane (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

1,2-Dichloroethane (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

1,1-Dichloroethene (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (mg/kg dry) < 0.27

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

1,2-Dichloropropane (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

Ethylbenzene (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

Methyl tert-butyl ether (mg/kg dry) < 0.11

Methylene chloride (mg/kg dry) < 1.33

Styrene (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

Tetrachloroethene (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

Toluene (mg/kg dry) < 0.53

1,1,1-Trichloroethane (mg/kg dry) < 0.13

1,1,2-Trichloroethane (mg/kg dry) < 0.19

Trichloroethene (mg/kg dry) < 0.03

Trichlorofluoromethane (mg/kg dry) < 0.27

Vinyl chloride (mg/kg dry) < 0.27

Xylenes (total) (mg/kg dry) 0.27

Sur: Toluene-d8 (%) 87

Sur: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (%) 72

Sur: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 (%) 96



Surrey, BC V3S 8E5

TEL

FAX


General Comments:








Authorized By:




www.caro.ca

Locations:

5080502







R615-0685-01

#301 - 19292 - 60th Avenue (604) 533-2992

(604) 533-0768

Jason Tung

R615-0685-01

CoV GNW


Brent Coates, B.Sc.


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

R615-0685-01

5080502







Analytical Summary Appendix 2

Tabulated data in condensed format to assist with comparisons


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502


Dissolved Metals APHA 3030 B / APHA

3125 B

0.45 µm Filtration / Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass

Spectrometry (ICP-MS)

Richmond

EPH in Water EPA 3510C* / BCMOE

EPHw

Liquid-Liquid DCM Extraction (B/N) / Gas


Richmond

Hardness (as CaCO3) APHA 2340 B Calculation N/A


Mercury, dissolved by CVAFS EPA 245.7* BrCl2 Oxidation / Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence

Spectrometry (CVAFS)

Richmond

Oil and Grease, Total EPA 1664A* Liquid-Liquid Extraction with Hexane Richmond

PAH in Water EPA 3510C* / EPA

8270D

Liquid-Liquid DCM Extraction (B/N) / GC-MS (SIM) Richmond

Total Suspended Solids APHA 2540 D* Gravimetry (Dried at 103-105C) Richmond

VH in Water EPA 5030B / BCMOE

VHw

Purge&Trap / Gas Chromatography (GC-FID) Richmond

VOC in Water EPA 5030B / EPA

8260B

Purge&Trap / GC-MS (SIM) Richmond

VPHw BCMOE VPH Calculation (VH - BTEX - Styrene) N/A







Glossary of Terms:




<

Milligrams per litremg/L

Micrograms per litreµg/L


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits


Sample ID: 15-MW4 (5080502-01) [Water] Sampled: Aug-06-15 17:00

General Parameters

mg/L< 2Oil & Grease, Total Aug-12-152 N/A

mg/L192Solids, Total Suspended Aug-11-152 N/A

Calculated Parameters

mg/L91.9Hardness, Total (Diss. as CaCO3) N/A5.0 N/A

Dissolved Metals

µg/L< 50Aluminum, dissolved Aug-10-1550 N/A

µg/L< 1Antimony, dissolved Aug-10-151 N/A

µg/L< 5Arsenic, dissolved Aug-10-155 N/A

µg/L< 50Barium, dissolved Aug-10-1550 N/A

µg/L< 1Beryllium, dissolved Aug-10-151 N/A

µg/L80Boron, dissolved Aug-10-1540 N/A

µg/L< 0.1Cadmium, dissolved Aug-10-150.1 N/A

µg/L25200Calcium, dissolved Aug-10-152000 N/A

µg/L< 5Chromium, dissolved Aug-10-155 N/A

µg/L< 0.5Cobalt, dissolved Aug-10-150.5 N/A

µg/L< 2Copper, dissolved Aug-10-152 N/A

µg/L< 100Iron, dissolved Aug-10-15100 N/A

µg/L< 1Lead, dissolved Aug-10-151 N/A

µg/L2Lithium, dissolved Aug-10-151 N/A

µg/L7100Magnesium, dissolved Aug-10-15100 N/A

µg/L53Manganese, dissolved Aug-10-152 N/A

µg/L< 0.02Mercury, dissolved Aug-14-150.02 Aug-12-15

µg/L5Molybdenum, dissolved Aug-10-151 N/A

µg/L< 2Nickel, dissolved Aug-10-152 N/A

µg/L< 5Selenium, dissolved Aug-10-155 N/A

µg/L< 0.5Silver, dissolved Aug-10-150.5 N/A

µg/L149000Sodium, dissolved Aug-10-15200 N/A

µg/L240Strontium, dissolved Aug-10-1510 N/A

µg/L< 0.2Thallium, dissolved Aug-10-150.2 N/A

µg/L< 50Titanium, dissolved Aug-10-1550 N/A

µg/L0.4Uranium, dissolved Aug-10-150.2 N/A

µg/L< 10Vanadium, dissolved Aug-10-1510 N/A

µg/L< 40Zinc, dissolved Aug-10-1540 N/A


General Parameters




mg/L369Hardness, Total (Diss. as CaCO3) N/A5.0 N/A

Dissolved Metals



REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits


Sample ID: 15-MW1 (5080502-02) [Water] Sampled: Aug-07-15 15:00, Continued

Dissolved Metals, Continued



µg/L90Barium, dissolved Aug-10-1550 N/A






µg/L0.9Cobalt, dissolved Aug-10-150.5 N/A


µg/L950Iron, dissolved Aug-10-15100 N/A


µg/L< 1Lithium, dissolved Aug-10-151 N/A





µg/L< 2Nickel, dissolved Aug-10-152 N/A











µg/L< 100VHw (6-10) Aug-09-15100 N/A

µg/L< 100VPHw N/A100 N/A

µg/L440EPHw10-19 Aug-10-15100 Aug-09-15

µg/L551EPHw19-32 Aug-10-15100 Aug-09-15

µg/L440LEPHw N/A100 N/A

µg/L551HEPHw N/A100 N/A


µg/L< 0.05Acenaphthene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Acenaphthylene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.09Acridine Aug-10-150.10 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Anthracene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Benz (a) anthracene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.01Benzo (a) pyrene Aug-10-150.01 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (b) fluoranthene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (k) fluoranthene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits




µg/L< 0.05Chrysene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Fluoranthene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Fluorene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.30Naphthalene Aug-10-150.30 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.10Phenanthrene Aug-10-150.10 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.09Pyrene Aug-10-150.10 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.10Quinoline Aug-10-150.10 Aug-09-15




Aug-10-1569 64-111Surrogate: Chrysene-d12 Aug-09-15%

Aug-10-1570 60-114Surrogate: Perylene-d12 Aug-09-15%

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

µg/L< 0.5Benzene Aug-09-150.5 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Bromodichloromethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Bromoform Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Carbon tetrachloride Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Chlorobenzene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 2.0Chloroethane Aug-09-152.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Chloroform Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Dibromochloromethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 0.31,2-Dibromoethane Aug-09-150.3 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Dibromomethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 0.51,2-Dichlorobenzene Aug-09-150.5 N/A



µg/L< 1.01,1-Dichloroethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A


µg/L< 1.01,1-Dichloroethene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.01,2-Dichloropropane Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Ethylbenzene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Methyl tert-butyl ether Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 3.0Methylene chloride Aug-09-153.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Styrene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.01,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Tetrachloroethene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Toluene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.01,1,1-Trichloroethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A



REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits



Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Continued

µg/L< 1.0Trichloroethene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Trichlorofluoromethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 2.0Vinyl chloride Aug-09-152.0 N/A

µg/L< 2.0Xylenes (total) Aug-09-152.0 N/A

Aug-09-1587 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 N/A%

Aug-09-1578 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene N/A%

Aug-09-1591 70-130Surrogate: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 N/A%


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502





environment














Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes



µg/LVHw (6-10) < 100 100


85-1151041480µg/LVHw (6-10) 1540 100



µg/LEPHw10-19 < 100 100

µg/L< 100EPHw19-32 100


63-123713470µg/LEPHw10-19 2480 100

µg/L 4990 51-102633120EPHw19-32 100

Dissolved Metals, Batch B5H0419


µg/LAluminum, dissolved < 50 50

µg/L< 1Antimony, dissolved 1

µg/L< 5Arsenic, dissolved 5

µg/L< 50Barium, dissolved 50

µg/L< 1Beryllium, dissolved 1

µg/L< 40Boron, dissolved 40

µg/L< 0.1Cadmium, dissolved 0.1

µg/L< 2000Calcium, dissolved 2000

µg/L< 5Chromium, dissolved 5

µg/L< 0.5Cobalt, dissolved 0.5

µg/L< 2Copper, dissolved 2

µg/L< 100Iron, dissolved 100

µg/L< 1Lead, dissolved 1

µg/L< 1Lithium, dissolved 1


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes

Dissolved Metals, Batch B5H0419, Continued


µg/L< 100Magnesium, dissolved 100

µg/L< 2Manganese, dissolved 2

µg/L< 1Molybdenum, dissolved 1

µg/L< 2Nickel, dissolved 2

µg/L< 5Selenium, dissolved 5

µg/L< 0.5Silver, dissolved 0.5

µg/L< 200Sodium, dissolved 200

µg/L< 10Strontium, dissolved 10

µg/L< 0.2Thallium, dissolved 0.2

µg/L< 50Titanium, dissolved 50

µg/L< 0.2Uranium, dissolved 0.2

µg/L< 10Vanadium, dissolved 10

µg/L< 40Zinc, dissolved 40


58-142105233µg/LAluminum, dissolved 250 50

µg/L 43.0 75-12510947Antimony, dissolved 1

µg/L 438 81-11993409Arsenic, dissolved 5

µg/L 3350 83-1171043490Barium, dissolved 50

µg/L 213 80-120103220Beryllium, dissolved 1

µg/L 1740 74-1171011760Boron, dissolved 40

µg/L 224 83-117100224Cadmium, dissolved 0.1

µg/L 7690 76-1241068200Calcium, dissolved 2000

µg/L 437 81-11996419Chromium, dissolved 5

µg/L 128 76-124100128Cobalt, dissolved 0.5

µg/L 844 84-116103867Copper, dissolved 2

µg/L 1290 74-1261011310Iron, dissolved 100

µg/L 112 72-128101113Lead, dissolved 1

µg/L 104 60-140109114Lithium, dissolved 1

µg/L 6920 81-119976700Magnesium, dissolved 100

µg/L 345 84-116100346Manganese, dissolved 2

µg/L 426 83-117100425Molybdenum, dissolved 1

µg/L 840 74-12698821Nickel, dissolved 2

µg/L 33.1 70-1309933Selenium, dissolved 5

µg/L 19100 72-1289518100Sodium, dissolved 200

µg/L 916 84-113102940Strontium, dissolved 10

µg/L 39.3 57-1439939.0Thallium, dissolved 0.2

µg/L 266 85-11598259Uranium, dissolved 0.2

µg/L 869 87-11394820Vanadium, dissolved 10

µg/L 881 72-12895840Zinc, dissolved 40



µg/LMercury, dissolved < 0.02 0.02


50-150654.56µg/LMercury, dissolved 2.98 0.02



mg/LSolids, Total Suspended < 1 2


83-1079550.8mg/LSolids, Total Suspended 48 2


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes












mg/LOil & Grease, Total < 2 2




66-1078440.4mg/LOil & Grease, Total 34 2



LCS Dup (B5H0549-BSD1) Prepared: Aug-12-15, Analyzed: Aug-12-15






µg/LAcenaphthene < 0.05 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Acenaphthylene 0.05

µg/L< 0.10Acridine 0.10

µg/L< 0.05Anthracene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Benz (a) anthracene 0.05

µg/L< 0.01Benzo (a) pyrene 0.01

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (b) fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (k) fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Chrysene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Dibenz (a,h) anthracene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Fluorene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.05

µg/L< 0.30Naphthalene 0.30

µg/L< 0.10Phenanthrene 0.10

µg/L< 0.10Pyrene 0.10

µg/L< 0.10Quinoline 0.10

µg/L 1.00 46-109Surrogate: Naphthalene-d8 700.698

µg/L 1.00 53-103Surrogate: Acenaphthene-d10 660.658

µg/L 1.00 45-103Surrogate: Phenanthrene-d10 520.516

µg/L 1.00 64-111Surrogate: Chrysene-d12 940.945


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes



µg/L 1.00 60-114Surrogate: Perylene-d12 1000.996


54-92751.00µg/LAcenaphthene 0.75 0.05

µg/L 1.00 54-95830.83Acenaphthylene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 49-87620.62Acridine 0.10

µg/L 1.00 53-94700.70Anthracene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 52-95570.57Benz (a) anthracene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 52-103680.68Benzo (a) pyrene 0.01

µg/L 1.00 49-94590.59Benzo (b) fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 51-98550.55Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 49-105760.76Benzo (k) fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 50-104700.70Chrysene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 49-96540.54Dibenz (a,h) anthracene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 53-102780.78Fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 54-91650.65Fluorene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 51-99620.62Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 51-91720.72Naphthalene 0.30

µg/L 1.00 56-96650.65Phenanthrene 0.10

µg/L 1.00 51-105860.86Pyrene 0.10

µg/L 1.00 45-101720.72Quinoline 0.10








µg/L 1.00 54-9588 60.88Acenaphthylene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 49-8762 < 10.62Acridine 200.10

µg/L 1.00 53-9472 30.72Anthracene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 52-9561 60.61Benz (a) anthracene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 52-10374 80.74Benzo (a) pyrene 200.01

µg/L 1.00 49-9463 60.63Benzo (b) fluoranthene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 51-9862 110.62Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 49-10584 100.84Benzo (k) fluoranthene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 50-10474 50.74Chrysene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 49-9661 120.61Dibenz (a,h) anthracene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 53-10276 20.76Fluoranthene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 54-9170 70.70Fluorene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 51-9970 120.70Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 51-9175 40.75Naphthalene 200.30

µg/L 1.00 56-9669 60.69Phenanthrene 200.10

µg/L 1.00 51-10582 40.82Pyrene 200.10

µg/L 1.00 45-10177 60.77Quinoline 200.10








µg/LBenzene < 0.5 0.5


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes



µg/L< 1.0Bromodichloromethane 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Bromoform 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Carbon tetrachloride 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Chlorobenzene 1.0

µg/L< 2.0Chloroethane 2.0

µg/L< 1.0Chloroform 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Dibromochloromethane 1.0

µg/L< 0.31,2-Dibromoethane 0.3

µg/L< 1.0Dibromomethane 1.0

µg/L< 0.51,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.5



µg/L< 1.01,1-Dichloroethane 1.0


µg/L< 1.01,1-Dichloroethene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0

µg/L< 1.01,2-Dichloropropane 1.0

µg/L< 1.0cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Ethylbenzene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.0

µg/L< 3.0Methylene chloride 3.0

µg/L< 1.0Styrene 1.0

µg/L< 1.01,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Tetrachloroethene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Toluene 1.0

µg/L< 1.01,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0


µg/L< 1.0Trichloroethene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0

µg/L< 2.0Vinyl chloride 2.0

µg/L< 2.0Xylenes (total) 2.0

µg/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 9122.9

µg/L 31.5 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 9128.8

µg/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 10827.0


70-13010520.0µg/LBenzene 21.0 0.5

µg/L 20.0 70-13010020.0Bromodichloromethane 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011422.7Bromoform 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309619.3Carbon tetrachloride 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011122.2Chlorobenzene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 SPK170-13016332.5Chloroethane 2.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13010621.2Chloroform 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13010320.5Dibromochloromethane 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309719.41,2-Dibromoethane 0.3

µg/L 20.0 70-13010020.0Dibromomethane 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011623.21,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.5



µg/L 20.0 70-13010420.71,1-Dichloroethane 1.0


µg/L 20.0 70-1309619.21,1-Dichloroethene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309519.0cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309719.4trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes



µg/L 20.0 70-1309819.61,2-Dichloropropane 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309118.3cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309318.5trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011322.6Ethylbenzene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1308817.7Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011723.4Methylene chloride 3.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011322.6Styrene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011422.81,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13010821.5Tetrachloroethene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13010821.6Toluene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13010320.71,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0


µg/L 20.0 70-13010621.2Trichloroethene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011422.7Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1308717.4Vinyl chloride 2.0

µg/L 60.0 70-13010965.4Xylenes (total) 2.0




QC Qualifiers:




REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502

5080502-01 5080502-02

Water Water

Aug-06-15 Aug-07-15

15-MW4 15-MW1

General Parameters Oil & Grease, Total (mg/L) < 2 < 2

Solids, Total Suspended (mg/L) 192 12

Calculated Parameters Hardness, Total (Diss. as CaCO3) (mg/L) 91.9 369

Dissolved Metals Aluminum, dissolved (ug/L) < 50 < 50

Antimony, dissolved (ug/L) < 1 < 1

Arsenic, dissolved (ug/L) < 5 < 5

Barium, dissolved (ug/L) < 50 90

Beryllium, dissolved (ug/L) < 1 < 1

Boron, dissolved (ug/L) 80 50

Cadmium, dissolved (ug/L) < 0.1 < 0.1

Calcium, dissolved (ug/L) 25200 131000

Chromium, dissolved (ug/L) < 5 < 5

Cobalt, dissolved (ug/L) < 0.5 0.9

Copper, dissolved (ug/L) < 2 < 2

Iron, dissolved (ug/L) < 100 950

Lead, dissolved (ug/L) < 1 < 1

Lithium, dissolved (ug/L) 2 < 1

Magnesium, dissolved (ug/L) 7100 10300

Manganese, dissolved (ug/L) 53 855

Mercury, dissolved (ug/L) < 0.02 < 0.02

Molybdenum, dissolved (ug/L) 5 1

Nickel, dissolved (ug/L) < 2 < 2

Selenium, dissolved (ug/L) < 5 < 5

Silver, dissolved (ug/L) < 0.5 < 0.5

Sodium, dissolved (ug/L) 149000 55900

Strontium, dissolved (ug/L) 240 650

Thallium, dissolved (ug/L) < 0.2 < 0.2

Titanium, dissolved (ug/L) < 50 < 50

Uranium, dissolved (ug/L) 0.4 0.3

Vanadium, dissolved (ug/L) < 10 < 10

Zinc, dissolved (ug/L) < 40 < 40

BCMOE Aggregate

Hydrocarbons

VHw (6-10) (ug/L) < 100

VPHw (ug/L) < 100

EPHw10-19 (ug/L) 440

EPHw19-32 (ug/L) 551

LEPHw (ug/L) 440

HEPHw (ug/L) 551

Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH)

Acenaphthene (ug/L) < 0.05

Acenaphthylene (ug/L) < 0.05

Acridine (ug/L) < 0.09

Anthracene (ug/L) < 0.05

Benz (a) anthracene (ug/L) < 0.05

Benzo (a) pyrene (ug/L) < 0.01

Benzo (b) fluoranthene (ug/L) < 0.05


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502

5080502-01 5080502-02

Water Water

Aug-06-15 Aug-07-15

15-MW4 15-MW1

Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH)

Benzo (g,h,i) perylene (ug/L) < 0.05

Benzo (k) fluoranthene (ug/L) < 0.05

Chrysene (ug/L) < 0.05

Dibenz (a,h) anthracene (ug/L) < 0.05

Fluoranthene (ug/L) < 0.05

Fluorene (ug/L) < 0.05

Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene (ug/L) < 0.05

Naphthalene (ug/L) < 0.30

Phenanthrene (ug/L) < 0.10

Pyrene (ug/L) < 0.09

Quinoline (ug/L) < 0.10

Sur: Naphthalene-d8 (%) 98

Sur: Acenaphthene-d10 (%) 71

Sur: Phenanthrene-d10 (%) 68

Sur: Chrysene-d12 (%) 69

Sur: Perylene-d12 (%) 70

Volatile Organic

Compounds (VOC)

Benzene (ug/L) < 0.5

Bromodichloromethane (ug/L) < 1.0

Bromoform (ug/L) < 1.0

Carbon tetrachloride (ug/L) < 1.0

Chlorobenzene (ug/L) < 1.0

Chloroethane (ug/L) < 2.0

Chloroform (ug/L) < 1.0

Dibromochloromethane (ug/L) < 1.0

1,2-Dibromoethane (ug/L) < 0.3

Dibromomethane (ug/L) < 1.0

1,2-Dichlorobenzene (ug/L) < 0.5



1,1-Dichloroethane (ug/L) < 1.0

1,2-Dichloroethane (ug/L) < 1.0

1,1-Dichloroethene (ug/L) < 1.0

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (ug/L) < 1.0

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene (ug/L) < 1.0

1,2-Dichloropropane (ug/L) < 1.0

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene (ug/L) < 1.0

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene (ug/L) < 1.0

Ethylbenzene (ug/L) < 1.0

Methyl tert-butyl ether (ug/L) < 1.0

Methylene chloride (ug/L) < 3.0

Styrene (ug/L) < 1.0

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (ug/L) < 1.0

Tetrachloroethene (ug/L) < 1.0

Toluene (ug/L) < 1.0

1,1,1-Trichloroethane (ug/L) < 1.0


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080502

5080502-01 5080502-02

Water Water

Aug-06-15 Aug-07-15

15-MW4 15-MW1

Volatile Organic

Compounds (VOC)

1,1,2-Trichloroethane (ug/L) < 1.0

Trichloroethene (ug/L) < 1.0

Trichlorofluoromethane (ug/L) < 1.0

Vinyl chloride (ug/L) < 2.0

Xylenes (total) (ug/L) < 2.0

Sur: Toluene-d8 (%) 87

Sur: 4-Bromofluorobenzene (%) 78

Sur: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 (%) 91



Surrey, BC V3S 8E5

TEL

FAX


General Comments:








Authorized By:




www.caro.ca

Locations:

5080503







R615-0685-01

#301 - 19292 - 60th Avenue (604) 533-2992

(604) 533-0768

Jason Tung

R615-0685-01

Glen DR + GNW


Brent Coates, B.Sc.


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

R615-0685-01

5080503








REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080503


Dissolved Metals APHA 3030 B / APHA

3125 B

0.45 µm Filtration / Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass

Spectrometry (ICP-MS)

Richmond

EPH in Water EPA 3510C* / BCMOE

EPHw

Liquid-Liquid DCM Extraction (B/N) / Gas


Richmond

Hardness (as CaCO3) APHA 2340 B Calculation N/A


Mercury, dissolved by CVAFS EPA 245.7* BrCl2 Oxidation / Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence

Spectrometry (CVAFS)

Richmond

Oil and Grease, Total EPA 1664A* Liquid-Liquid Extraction with Hexane Richmond

PAH in Water EPA 3510C* / EPA

8270D

Liquid-Liquid DCM Extraction (B/N) / GC-MS (SIM) Richmond

Total Suspended Solids APHA 2540 D* Gravimetry (Dried at 103-105C) Richmond

VH in Water EPA 5030B / BCMOE

VHw

Purge&Trap / Gas Chromatography (GC-FID) Richmond

VOC in Water EPA 5030B / EPA

8260B

Purge&Trap / GC-MS (SIM) Richmond

VPHw BCMOE VPH Calculation (VH - BTEX - Styrene) N/A







Glossary of Terms:




<

Milligrams per litremg/L

Micrograms per litreµg/L


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080503

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits



General Parameters




mg/L571Hardness, Total (Diss. as CaCO3) N/A5.0 N/A

Dissolved Metals




µg/L740Barium, dissolved Aug-10-1550 N/A






µg/L2.5Cobalt, dissolved Aug-10-150.5 N/A


µg/L42600Iron, dissolved Aug-10-15100 N/A


µg/L14Lithium, dissolved Aug-10-151 N/A





µg/L2Nickel, dissolved Aug-10-152 N/A











µg/L< 100VHw (6-10) Aug-09-15100 N/A

µg/L< 100VPHw N/A100 N/A

µg/L190EPHw10-19 Aug-10-15100 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 100EPHw19-32 Aug-10-15100 Aug-09-15

µg/L190LEPHw N/A100 N/A

µg/L< 100HEPHw N/A100 N/A


µg/L0.09Acenaphthene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Acenaphthylene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080503

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits




µg/L< 0.10Acridine Aug-10-150.10 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Anthracene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Benz (a) anthracene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.01Benzo (a) pyrene Aug-10-150.01 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (b) fluoranthene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (k) fluoranthene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Chrysene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Fluoranthene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Fluorene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.05Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Aug-10-150.05 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.30Naphthalene Aug-10-150.30 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.10Phenanthrene Aug-10-150.10 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.10Pyrene Aug-10-150.10 Aug-09-15

µg/L< 0.10Quinoline Aug-10-150.10 Aug-09-15




Aug-10-1548 64-111Surrogate: Chrysene-d12 Aug-09-15 S09%

Aug-10-1555 60-114Surrogate: Perylene-d12 Aug-09-15 S09%

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

µg/L< 0.5Benzene Aug-09-150.5 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Bromodichloromethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Bromoform Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Carbon tetrachloride Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Chlorobenzene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 2.0Chloroethane Aug-09-152.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Chloroform Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Dibromochloromethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 0.31,2-Dibromoethane Aug-09-150.3 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Dibromomethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A






µg/L< 1.01,1-Dichloroethene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.01,2-Dichloropropane Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Ethylbenzene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Methyl tert-butyl ether Aug-09-151.0 N/A


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080503

Analyte Result /

Recovery

MRL /

Limits



Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Continued

µg/L< 3.0Methylene chloride Aug-09-153.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Styrene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.01,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Tetrachloroethene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Toluene Aug-09-151.0 N/A



µg/L< 1.0Trichloroethene Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 1.0Trichlorofluoromethane Aug-09-151.0 N/A

µg/L< 2.0Vinyl chloride Aug-09-152.0 N/A

µg/L< 2.0Xylenes (total) Aug-09-152.0 N/A

Aug-09-1588 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 N/A%

Aug-09-1583 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene N/A%

Aug-09-1599 70-130Surrogate: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 N/A%

Sample / Analysis Qualifiers:

S09 The surrogate recovery for this sample is outside of established control limits due to sample matrix effect


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080503





environment














Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes



µg/LVHw (6-10) < 100 100


85-1151041480µg/LVHw (6-10) 1540 100



µg/LEPHw10-19 < 100 100

µg/L< 100EPHw19-32 100


63-123713470µg/LEPHw10-19 2480 100

µg/L 4990 51-102633120EPHw19-32 100



µg/LAluminum, dissolved < 50 50

µg/L< 1Antimony, dissolved 1

µg/L< 5Arsenic, dissolved 5

µg/L< 50Barium, dissolved 50

µg/L< 1Beryllium, dissolved 1

µg/L< 40Boron, dissolved 40

µg/L< 0.1Cadmium, dissolved 0.1

µg/L< 2000Calcium, dissolved 2000

µg/L< 5Chromium, dissolved 5

µg/L< 0.5Cobalt, dissolved 0.5

µg/L< 2Copper, dissolved 2

µg/L< 100Iron, dissolved 100

µg/L< 1Lead, dissolved 1

µg/L< 1Lithium, dissolved 1


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080503


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes

Dissolved Metals, Batch B5H0419, Continued


µg/L< 100Magnesium, dissolved 100

µg/L< 2Manganese, dissolved 2

µg/L< 1Molybdenum, dissolved 1

µg/L< 2Nickel, dissolved 2

µg/L< 5Selenium, dissolved 5

µg/L< 0.5Silver, dissolved 0.5

µg/L< 200Sodium, dissolved 200

µg/L< 10Strontium, dissolved 10

µg/L< 0.2Thallium, dissolved 0.2

µg/L< 50Titanium, dissolved 50

µg/L< 0.2Uranium, dissolved 0.2

µg/L< 10Vanadium, dissolved 10

µg/L< 40Zinc, dissolved 40


58-142105233µg/LAluminum, dissolved 250 50

µg/L 43.0 75-12510947Antimony, dissolved 1

µg/L 438 81-11993409Arsenic, dissolved 5

µg/L 3350 83-1171043490Barium, dissolved 50

µg/L 213 80-120103220Beryllium, dissolved 1

µg/L 1740 74-1171011760Boron, dissolved 40

µg/L 224 83-117100224Cadmium, dissolved 0.1

µg/L 7690 76-1241068200Calcium, dissolved 2000

µg/L 437 81-11996419Chromium, dissolved 5

µg/L 128 76-124100128Cobalt, dissolved 0.5

µg/L 844 84-116103867Copper, dissolved 2

µg/L 1290 74-1261011310Iron, dissolved 100

µg/L 112 72-128101113Lead, dissolved 1

µg/L 104 60-140109114Lithium, dissolved 1

µg/L 6920 81-119976700Magnesium, dissolved 100

µg/L 345 84-116100346Manganese, dissolved 2

µg/L 426 83-117100425Molybdenum, dissolved 1

µg/L 840 74-12698821Nickel, dissolved 2

µg/L 33.1 70-1309933Selenium, dissolved 5

µg/L 19100 72-1289518100Sodium, dissolved 200

µg/L 916 84-113102940Strontium, dissolved 10

µg/L 39.3 57-1439939.0Thallium, dissolved 0.2

µg/L 266 85-11598259Uranium, dissolved 0.2

µg/L 869 87-11394820Vanadium, dissolved 10

µg/L 881 72-12895840Zinc, dissolved 40



µg/LMercury, dissolved < 0.02 0.02


µg/LMercury, dissolved < 0.02< 0.02 200.02


50-150654.56µg/LMercury, dissolved 2.98 0.02





REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080503


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes

General Parameters, Batch B5H0439, Continued






















µg/LAcenaphthene < 0.05 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Acenaphthylene 0.05

µg/L< 0.10Acridine 0.10

µg/L< 0.05Anthracene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Benz (a) anthracene 0.05

µg/L< 0.01Benzo (a) pyrene 0.01

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (b) fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Benzo (k) fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Chrysene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Dibenz (a,h) anthracene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Fluorene 0.05

µg/L< 0.05Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.05

µg/L< 0.30Naphthalene 0.30

µg/L< 0.10Phenanthrene 0.10

µg/L< 0.10Pyrene 0.10

µg/L< 0.10Quinoline 0.10







REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080503


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes




µg/L 1.00 54-95830.83Acenaphthylene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 49-87620.62Acridine 0.10

µg/L 1.00 53-94700.70Anthracene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 52-95570.57Benz (a) anthracene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 52-103680.68Benzo (a) pyrene 0.01

µg/L 1.00 49-94590.59Benzo (b) fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 51-98550.55Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 49-105760.76Benzo (k) fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 50-104700.70Chrysene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 49-96540.54Dibenz (a,h) anthracene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 53-102780.78Fluoranthene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 54-91650.65Fluorene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 51-99620.62Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.05

µg/L 1.00 51-91720.72Naphthalene 0.30

µg/L 1.00 56-96650.65Phenanthrene 0.10

µg/L 1.00 51-105860.86Pyrene 0.10

µg/L 1.00 45-101720.72Quinoline 0.10








µg/L 1.00 54-9588 60.88Acenaphthylene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 49-8762 < 10.62Acridine 200.10

µg/L 1.00 53-9472 30.72Anthracene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 52-9561 60.61Benz (a) anthracene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 52-10374 80.74Benzo (a) pyrene 200.01

µg/L 1.00 49-9463 60.63Benzo (b) fluoranthene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 51-9862 110.62Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 49-10584 100.84Benzo (k) fluoranthene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 50-10474 50.74Chrysene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 49-9661 120.61Dibenz (a,h) anthracene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 53-10276 20.76Fluoranthene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 54-9170 70.70Fluorene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 51-9970 120.70Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 200.05

µg/L 1.00 51-9175 40.75Naphthalene 200.30

µg/L 1.00 56-9669 60.69Phenanthrene 200.10

µg/L 1.00 51-10582 40.82Pyrene 200.10

µg/L 1.00 45-10177 60.77Quinoline 200.10








µg/LBenzene < 0.5 0.5

µg/L< 1.0Bromodichloromethane 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Bromoform 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Carbon tetrachloride 1.0


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080503


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes



µg/L< 1.0Chlorobenzene 1.0

µg/L< 2.0Chloroethane 2.0

µg/L< 1.0Chloroform 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Dibromochloromethane 1.0

µg/L< 0.31,2-Dibromoethane 0.3

µg/L< 1.0Dibromomethane 1.0






µg/L< 1.01,1-Dichloroethene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0

µg/L< 1.01,2-Dichloropropane 1.0

µg/L< 1.0cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Ethylbenzene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.0

µg/L< 3.0Methylene chloride 3.0

µg/L< 1.0Styrene 1.0

µg/L< 1.01,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Tetrachloroethene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Toluene 1.0



µg/L< 1.0Trichloroethene 1.0

µg/L< 1.0Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0

µg/L< 2.0Vinyl chloride 2.0

µg/L< 2.0Xylenes (total) 2.0





70-13010520.0µg/LBenzene 21.0 0.5

µg/L 20.0 70-13010020.0Bromodichloromethane 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011422.7Bromoform 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309619.3Carbon tetrachloride 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011122.2Chlorobenzene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 SPK170-13016332.5Chloroethane 2.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13010621.2Chloroform 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13010320.5Dibromochloromethane 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309719.41,2-Dibromoethane 0.3

µg/L 20.0 70-13010020.0Dibromomethane 1.0






µg/L 20.0 70-1309619.21,1-Dichloroethene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309519.0cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309719.4trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309819.61,2-Dichloropropane 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309118.3cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1309318.5trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0


REPORTED TO

PROJECT


REPORTED Aug-17-15


R615-0685-01

5080503


Level

Source

Result% REC

REC

Limit% RPD

RPD

LimitNotes



µg/L 20.0 70-13011322.6Ethylbenzene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1308817.7Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011723.4Methylene chloride 3.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011322.6Styrene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011422.81,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13010821.5Tetrachloroethene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13010821.6Toluene 1.0



µg/L 20.0 70-13010621.2Trichloroethene 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-13011422.7Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0

µg/L 20.0 70-1308717.4Vinyl chloride 2.0

µg/L 60.0 70-13010965.4Xylenes (total) 2.0




QC Qualifiers:




Appendix G: Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Sewer

Use Bylaw No. 299, 2007 (Consolidated)

Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Sewer Use Bylaw No. 299, 2007 Consolidated Page 1 of 38

THIS IS A CONSOLIDATION, FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES, OF:

“Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Sewer Use Bylaw No. 299, 2007” (Adopted May 25, 2007)

“Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Amending Bylaw No. 244, 2008”

(Adopted May 23, 2008)

“Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Amending Bylaw No. 252, 2009” (Adopted November 27, 2009)

“Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Sewer Use Amending Bylaw No. 256,

2010” (Adopted May 21, 2010)


2012” (Adopted March 2, 2012)


2012” (Adopted October 26, 2012. Repealed by Bylaw 276, 2012)


2012” (Adopted November 30, 2012)

Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Sewer Use Amending Bylaw No. 277,

2014” (Adopted May 2, 2014)

Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Sewer Use Amending Bylaw No. 285, 2014” (Adopted July 25, 2014)

As of July 25, 2014

COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL BYLAWS MAY BE INSPECTED AT

BOARD AND INFORMATION SERVICES METRO VANCOUVER

SEWER USEBYLAW

CONSOLIDATED


GREATER VANCOUVER SEWERAGE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT

SEWER USE BYLAW NO. 299, 2007 WHEREAS pursuant to the Environmental Management Act of British Columbia and the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Act, the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District (the “District”) is authorized to make bylaws respecting the direct or indirect discharge of waste into any sewers and drains connected to a Sewage Facility operated by the District.

AND WHEREAS pursuant to section 7C(2) of the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Act the District is authorized to set fees payable by persons who discharge liquid waste into a Sewage Facility or whose liquid waste is treated by a Sewage Facility; Added by BL 244, 2008

NOW THEREFORE the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Board repeals, subject to section 7, the “Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Sewer Use Bylaw No. 164” and amendments thereto and in replacement enacts as follows: 1. PURPOSE

The purposes of this Bylaw include:

a) protecting the Sewers and Sewage Facilities from damage and promoting the efficient and cost‐effective operation of the Sewers and Sewage Facilities,

b) promoting Biosolids quality, c) protecting human health and safety, d) assisting the District’s efforts to remain in compliance with laws and regulatory

instruments to which it is subject, e) protecting the environment, and

f) imposing fees payable by persons who discharge liquid waste into a Sewage Facility or

whose liquid waste is treated by a Sewage Facility. Section 1 replaced by BL 244, 2008

2. INTERPRETATION

2.1 In this Bylaw and unless the context otherwise requires:

“Air” means the atmosphere but, except in a Sewer or a Sewage Facility or as the context may otherwise require, does not include the atmosphere inside a human‐made enclosure that is not open to the weather;


“Air Contaminant” means an “air contaminant” as defined in the Environmental Management Act; “Air Pollution” means the presence of Air Contaminants or substances that substantially alter or impair the usefulness of the Air; “Biochemical Oxygen Demand” or “BOD” means the quantity of molecular oxygen, expressed in milligrams per litre, used in the biochemical degradation of organic matter and to oxidize inorganic material during a 5‐day incubation period at 20 degrees Centigrade, as determined by the appropriate procedure in Standard Methods; “Biosolids” means “biosolids” as defined in the Organic Matter Recycling Regulation, as amended from time to time pursuant to the Environmental Management Act, produced by the District; “Board” means the Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage District Board; “Code of Practice” means a code of practice adopted by the Board for the discharge of Wastewater by a class of persons annexed hereto as a Schedule; “Code of Practice Facility” means a facility authorized under a Code of Practice; “Chemical Oxygen Demand” or “COD” means the quantity of oxygen utilized in the chemical oxidation of organic matter under standard laboratory procedures, expressed in milligrams per litre, as determined by the appropriate procedure in Standard Methods; “Combined Sewer” means a Sewer designed for the collection and transmission of Wastewater, Storm Water and Uncontaminated Water; “Contaminant” means any substance, whether gaseous, liquid or solid, whether dissolved or suspended, that:

a) injures or is capable of injuring the health or safety of a person, b) injures or is capable of injuring property or any life form, c) interferes or is capable of interfering with the proper operation of a Sewer or Sewage

Facilities,

d) causes or is capable of causing material physical discomfort to a person, or

e) damages or is capable of damaging the environment;

“Discharge Abatement Order” means an Order issued under section 6;

“District” means the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District; “Domestic Waste” means


(a) Waste produced on a Residential Premises, or (b) Sanitary Waste and wastewater from showers and restroom washbasins produced on

non‐residential property;

“Environmental Management Act” means the Environmental Management Act, S.B.C. 2003 c. 53, as amended from time to time and any successor legislation thereto and all regulations thereunder; “Food Sector Establishment” means a food sector establishment as defined in the Grease Interceptor Bylaw;

Replaced by BL 276, 2012

“Former Bylaw” means the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Sewer Use Bylaw No. 164, as amended; “Grab Sample” means a sample collected at one particular time and place; “Grease Interceptor Bylaw” means the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Food Sector Grease Interceptor Bylaw No. 268, 2012, as amended or replaced from time to time;

Added by BL 276, 2012

“Ground Water” means water in a saturated zone or stratum beneath the surface of land or below a surface water body; “Hazardous Waste” means “hazardous waste” as defined in the Environmental Management Act; “Hazardous Waste Regulation” means the Hazardous Waste Regulation as amended from time to time pursuant to the Environmental Management Act; “High Volume Discharge” means any cumulative discharge of Non‐Domestic Waste into a Sewer in excess of 300 cubic metres over any consecutive 30 day period or any instantaneous discharge of Non‐Domestic Waste in excess of 30 litres per minute;

“Industrial Treatment Fee” means a fee payable by any person holding a Waste Discharge Permit, excluding any person holding a Waste Discharge Permit for a groundwater or construction excavation site, who discharges Non‐Domestic Waste into a Sewer or Sewage Facility;


“Liquid Waste Fee” means a fee payable by any person who discharges Septic Tank Waste or Trucked Waste into a Sewage Facility;



“Non‐Domestic Waste” means all Wastewater except Domestic Waste, Sanitary Waste, Storm Water, Uncontaminated Water, and Septic Tank Waste; “Officer” means a municipal sewage control officer appointed by the Board under the Environmental Management Act and this Bylaw; “Oil and Grease” means any solvent extractable material of animal, vegetable or mineral origin as determined by procedures set out in Standard Methods and includes but is not limited to hydrocarbons, esters, fats, oils, waxes and high‐molecular‐weight carboxylic acids; “Order” means an order issued by a Sewage Control Manager under the Environmental Management Act or under this Bylaw and includes a Waste Discharge Permit, a Trucked Waste Authorization, and a Discharge Abatement Order; “person” includes an individual, firm, company, association, society, partnership, corporation, municipality, institution or other similar organization, agency or group; “Pollution Prevention Measure” means a process, practice, device, product, or other method or work that avoids, minimizes, or prevents the discharge of Non‐Domestic Waste to a Sewer or Sewage Facility;


“Pollution Prevention Plan” means a plan that complies with the requirements prescribed by this Bylaw;


“pH” means the logarithm to the base 10 of the reciprocal of the activity of hydrogen ions, in moles per litre of solution, as determined by the appropriate procedure described in Standard Methods; “Prohibited Waste” means a Waste set out in Schedule “A” annexed hereto; “Residential Premises” means a building or premises or part of a building or premises used or intended to be used solely for the purpose of a residential dwelling, whether on a permanent, temporary or seasonal basis; “Restricted Waste” means a Waste set out in Schedule “B” annexed hereto; “Sanitary Sewer” means a Sewer which carries Sanitary Waste or Wastewater but not intended to carry Storm Water; “Sanitary Waste” means Wastewater that contains human feces, urine, blood or body fluids originating from sanitary conveniences or other sources; “Septic Tank Waste” means any Waste extracted from a cesspool, septic tank, sewage holding tank, seepage pit, interceptor or other containment for human excretion and wastes;


“Sewage Control Manager” means a sewage control manager appointed by the Board under the Environmental Management Act and under the Bylaw and includes a Deputy Sewage Control Manager appointed by the Board; “Sewage Facility” means works owned by the District or otherwise under the control or jurisdiction of the District that gathers, treats, transports, stores, utilizes or discharges Wastewater; “Sewer” means all pipes, conduits, drains, and other equipment and facilities, owned or otherwise under the control or jurisdiction of the District, for collecting, pumping, and transporting Wastewater either to a Sewage Facility or otherwise and includes but is not limited to all such pipes, conduits, drains and other equipment and facilities which connect with those of the District; “Standard Methods” means the latest edition of “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater” jointly prepared and published from time to time by the American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and the Water Environment Federation or any successors thereto; “Storm Sewer” means a Sewer which is intended to carry Storm Water; “Storm Water” means drainage water resulting from rainfall or other natural precipitation from the atmosphere and includes, but is not limited to, water from melting snow or naturally occurring ice; “Suspended Solids” means insoluble matter in liquid that is removable by filtration, as determined by the appropriate procedure described in Standard Methods; "Tetrachloroethylene" means an aliphatic halogenated hydrocarbon having the chemical formula C2Cl4 also referred to as: ethylene tetrachloride, PCE, perc, perchlor, perchlorethylene, perchloroethylene, perk, tetrachloroethene and 1,1,2,2‐ tetrachloroethylene;


“Trucked Waste” means any Non‐Domestic Waste that is collected and transported off the site on which it originated by means other than discharge to a Sewer, including but not limited to Oil and Grease from interceptors and other sludges of organic origin; “Trucked Waste Authorization” means a Trucked Waste Authorization issued by a Sewage Control Manager pursuant to Section 4.1 (a) of this Bylaw; “Uncontaminated Water” means:

(a) water in its natural state, that, after use for any purpose, is not substantially changed from its natural state as to chemical or biochemical qualities or temperature;

(b) water supplied by municipal works that, after use for any purpose, is not substantially

changed from its state at the point of delivery from the municipal works as to chemical or biochemical qualities or temperature; and


(c) clean water from roof drains, building foundations, wells, and cisterns;

“Waste” means any substance whether gaseous, liquid or solid, that is discharged or discarded, directly or indirectly, to a Sewer or Sewage Facility; “Waste Discharge Permit” means a Waste Discharge Permit issued by a Sewage Control Manager pursuant to Section 5.3 of this Bylaw. “Wastewater” means the composite of water and water‐carried Wastes from residential, commercial, industrial or institutional premises or any other source; and

3. PROHIBITION

3.1 No person shall discharge or allow or cause to be discharged into a Sewer or Sewage Facility any Prohibited Waste.

3.2 No person shall discharge or allow or cause to be discharged into a Sewer or Sewage Facility any

Waste in a concentration or quantity that may be or may become a safety hazard to personnel operating or maintaining Sewers or Sewage Facilities.

3.3 No person shall discharge or allow or cause to be discharged into a Storm Sewer owned or

otherwise under the control or jurisdiction of the District, any substance except Storm Water, Uncontaminated Water and water from the provision of municipal services such as street flushing and fire extinguishing activities.

3.4 A municipality that is a member of the District shall not be guilty of an offence under sections

3.1 to 3.3 inclusive where there is a discharge in violation of one or more of those sections by a third party without the knowledge of that municipality into a sewer or sewage facility of that municipality which connects to a Sewer or Sewage Facility unless the municipality after becoming aware of such discharge fails forthwith to advise the District.

4. TRUCKED WASTE 4.1 No person shall discharge or allow or cause to be discharged into a Sewer or a Sewage Facility

any Trucked Waste unless: a) a person has a valid and subsisting Trucked Waste Authorization, and the discharge of

the Trucked Waste is conducted at the Sewage Facilities specified in the Trucked Waste Authorization, and is otherwise strictly in accordance with the Trucked Waste Authorization; or

b) a person operates a Food Sector Establishment in full compliance with the Grease

Interceptor Bylaw and the Trucked Waste is discharged at a District facility designated for receipt of Trucked Waste.

Replaced by BL 276, 2012

4.2 No person shall discharge or allow or cause Septic Tank Waste to be discharged into a Sewer,

except at a District facility designated for receipt of Septic Tank Waste.


5. WASTE DISCHARGE PERMITS, TRUCKED WASTE AUTHORIZATIONS, ORDERS, CODES OF PRACTICE, AND POLLUTION PREVENTION PLANS

Replaced by BL 285, 2014.

5.1 Subject to section 5.2, no person shall discharge or allow or cause the discharge into a Sewer or

a Sewage Facility any of the following:

a) a High Volume Discharge, b) Restricted Waste,

c) Storm Water,

d) Uncontaminated Water,

e) Groundwater,

f) Trucked Waste, or

g) water or any substance for the purpose of diluting any Non‐Domestic Waste.

5.2 Nothing prohibits the discharge of Waste specified in Section 5.1 provided that the person who discharges, or allows or causes the discharge, is in compliance with this Bylaw, the Grease Interceptor Bylaw, a valid and subsisting Waste Discharge Permit, a Trucked Waste Authorization, an Order, a Code of Practice, or an approved Pollution Prevention Plan.

Replaced by BL 276, 2012; and BL 285, 2014.

5.3 A Sewage Control Manager may issue a Waste Discharge Permit to allow the discharge of Non‐

Domestic Waste into a Sewer upon such terms and conditions as the Sewage Control Manager considers appropriate and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, may in the Waste Discharge Permit:

a) place limits and restrictions on the quantity, composition, frequency and nature of the

Waste permitted to be discharged;

b) require the holder of a Waste Discharge Permit to repair, alter, remove, or add to works or construct new works;

c) require the holder of a Waste Discharge Permit to monitor, in the way specified by the

Sewage Control Manager, the Waste being discharged under the Waste Discharge Permit and to keep records and provide information concerning the discharge and associated waste sources, treatment works and measures; and

d) provide that the Waste Discharge Permit will expire on a specified date, or upon the

occurrence of a specified event.


5.4 A Sewage Control Manager may, upon application from the holder of a Waste Discharge Permit, or upon a Sewage Control Manager’s own initiative, amend the terms and conditions of a Waste Discharge Permit.

5.5 A Sewage Control Manager may, by Order, require any person that discharges a Non‐Domestic

Waste directly or indirectly into a Sewer or Sewage Facility to apply for a Waste Discharge Permit.

5.6 Application for a Waste Discharge Permit or a Trucked Waste Authorization shall be made to a

Sewage Control Manager on such forms as a Sewage Control Manager may prescribe from time to time and shall be accompanied by such information, drawings and specifications as a Sewage Control Manager may from time to time prescribe.

5.7 Without limiting any other provision of this Bylaw, a Sewage Control Manager may amend,

suspend or revoke any Waste Discharge Permit or Trucked Waste Authorization for any purpose stated in Section 1 of this Bylaw.

5.8 Where a substance has been discharged into a Sewer or a Sewage Facility in contravention of

any Waste Discharge Permit, Trucked Waste Authorization, Order, the Grease Interceptor Bylaw, or this Bylaw, any person who:

a) owns the Waste being discharged in contravention or who has charge, management, or control thereof;

b) owns, operates, or controls the facility from which the Waste was discharged; or

c) causes or contributes to the causation of the discharge

shall, at the first available opportunity, verbally report such occurrence to a Sewage Control Manager or to an Officer and shall forthwith undertake all remedial action that is available to minimize, counteract, mitigate and remedy the effect of such discharge.

Revised by BL 276, 2012

5.9 Any person who is obliged to make a verbal report made under section 5.8 shall as soon as

practicable make a written report specifying:

a) the quantity of the substance discharged, b) the nature and composition of the substance discharged, c) the duration of the discharge, d) the cause of the discharge, and e) the corrective actions taken or proposed to minimize, counteract, mitigate, prevent the

recurrence of and remedy the effect of such discharge.


5.10 A Waste Discharge Permit, Trucked Waste Authorization, Order, or approved Pollution Prevention Plan may not be transferred or assigned without a Sewage Control Manager’s consent in writing.


5.11 A person may apply to a Sewage Control Manager for approval of a Pollution Prevention Plan. The Pollution Prevention Plan shall be in such form, and shall include such information, drawings, and specifications, as a Sewage Control Manager may prescribe from time to time.


5.12 A Sewage Control Manager may approve a Pollution Prevention Plan to allow

the discharge of Non‐Domestic Waste into a Sewer upon such terms and conditions as the Sewage Control Manager considers appropriate, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, requiring:

a) any Pollution Prevention Measure to be included in a Pollution Prevention

Plan;

b) a Pollution Prevention Plan to be implemented within the time period the

Sewage Control Manager directs;

c) studies, sampling, monitoring, analyses or other procedures to be

conducted, at the expense of the person who submitted the Pollution

Prevention Plan, and the results reported to a Sewage Control Manager; and

d) information to be reported to a Sewage Control Manager concerning any activities or operations at the facility.


5.13 A person who owns, operates, or controls more than one facility where similar activities or operations are conducted, or where similar Wastes are caused or produced, may submit one Pollution Prevention Plan for all such facility locations, provided that the Pollution Prevention Plan complies with the requirements prescribed by this Bylaw in respect of each facility location.


5.14 A Pollution Prevention Plan is not valid unless a Sewage Control Manager issues

an approval in writing of the Pollution Prevention Plan. Added by BL 285, 2014


5.15 A Sewage Control Manager may, upon application by the person who submitted the Pollution Prevention Plan or upon a Sewage Control Manager’s own initiative, amend the terms and conditions of an approved Pollution Prevention Plan.


5.16 Without limiting any other provision of this Bylaw, a Sewage Control Manager

may: a) suspend, cancel, or reinstate an approved Pollution Prevention Plan; and

b) provide that an approved Pollution Prevention Plan expires on a specified

date or upon the occurrence of a specified event. Added by BL 285, 2014

5.17 Every person must keep a copy of the approved Pollution Prevention Plan at the

facility to which the Pollution Prevention Plan relates, and where an approved Pollution Prevention Plan relates to more than one facility location, then a copy must be kept at each facility location.


5.18 Every person shall, upon request, make the approved Pollution Prevention Plan

available for inspection by an Officer or a Sewage Control Manager at each facility to which the Pollution Prevention Plan relates.


6. DISCHARGE ABATEMENT ORDERS

6.1 Whether or not a person holds and is in compliance with the Grease Interceptor Bylaw, a Waste Discharge Permit, Trucked Waste Authorization, Order, Code of Practice, or an approved Pollution Prevention Plan, a Sewage Control Manager may, for any of the purposes set out in section 1, issue a Discharge Abatement Order.

Revised by BL 276, 2012. Replaced by BL 285, 2014

6.2 A Discharge Abatement Order may:

a) require a person to alter the quantity, composition, duration and timing of the discharge or cease discharge of Non‐Domestic Waste to a Sewer or Sewage Facility; and

b) include any terms or conditions that could be included in a Waste Discharge Permit.

6.3 A Sewage Control Manager may amend or cancel a Discharge Abatement Order.


7. TRANSITION 7.1 A Waste Discharge Permit issued pursuant to the Former Bylaw shall be deemed to be a Waste

Discharge Permit, issued under this Bylaw, provided that the holder of such Waste Discharge Permit has paid, and continues to pay, all applicable fees.

7.2 An Authorization issued in respect to Trucked Waste pursuant to the Former Bylaw shall be

deemed to be a Trucked Waste Authorization issued under this Bylaw. 7.3 A Sewage Control Manager may, upon application or upon his or her own initiative, issue a

Waste Discharge Permit or a Trucked Waste Authorization to a person who holds a Waste Discharge Permit or Authorization under the Former Bylaw for the same source, in which case the Waste Discharge Permit or Authorization issued under the Former Bylaw shall cease to be of effect.

7.4 Waste Discharge Permit Administration fees required pursuant to section 9 of the Former Bylaw

will continue to be due on the anniversary date of the issuance of the Waste Discharge Permit. 8. DISCHARGE MONITORING 8.1 A Sewage Control Manager may require any person who is discharging Non‐Domestic Waste

into a Sewer to sample and analyze the discharge, at that person’s expense, in a manner satisfactory to the Sewage Control Manager.

8.2 A Sewage Control Manager may require that a person who is discharging Non‐Domestic Waste

into a Sewer install and maintain at that person’s expense and at a location determined by the Sewage Control Manager, a discharge monitoring point for the sampling of the Non‐Domestic Waste.

9. APPOINTMENT AND POWERS OF SEWAGE CONTROL MANAGER AND OFFICER 9.1 Without limiting the Board’s powers under the Environmental Management Act, the Board may,

from time to time, appoint one or more persons to be a Sewage Control Manager, a deputy Sewage Control Manager, or an Officer to undertake duties under this Bylaw and the Grease Interceptor Bylaw.


9.2 Nothing in this Bylaw restricts the powers of a Sewage Control Manager or an Officer under the

Environmental Management Act. 10. WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT/AUTHORIZATION FEES AND COSTS Revised by BL 244, 2008

10.1 The Board may from time to time establish fees to be charged for the application for and administration of a Waste Discharge Permit, a Trucked Waste Authorization or a Pollution Prevention Plan.

Amended by BL 256, 2010. Replaced by BL 285, 2014


10.2 Any person who contravenes any provision of this Bylaw, the Grease Interceptor Bylaw, a Waste Discharge Permit, Trucked Waste Authorization, Order, Code of Practice, or approved Pollution Prevention Plan shall be liable to the District for and shall indemnify the District from all costs, expenses, damages and injuries resulting from the contravention. This section does not limit any other remedies or actions the District may have under this Bylaw or otherwise at law.

Revised by BL 276, 2012. Replaced by BL 285, 2014

10.3 The fees established by the Board under section 10.1 are set out in Schedule “C” annexed

hereto. 11. APPEALS 11.1 A person aggrieved by a decision of a Sewage Control Manager may appeal the decision to the

extent provided by the Environmental Management Act in accordance with the procedures provided by the Environmental Management Act.

12. TAMPERING WITH SEWER WORKS AND EQUIPMENT Revised by BL 244. 2008

12.1 Except for persons authorized by the District and authorized personnel of the District and of any

member of the District, no person shall open or tamper with any manhole cover or other appurtenance forming part of a Sewer.

12.2 No person shall break, damage, destroy, deface, or tamper with or cause or permit the breaking,

damaging, destroying, defacing, or tampering with any permanent or temporary device installed in a Sewer or monitoring point determined by the Sewage Control Manager for the purpose of measuring, sampling and testing of Wastewater.


13. OFFENCES AND PENALTIES

13.1 Any person who contravenes this Bylaw, a Waste Discharge Permit, Trucked Waste Authorization, Order, Code of Practice, or an approved Pollution Prevention Plan commits an offence and is liable to a fine not exceeding $10,000.

Replaced by BL 285. 2014

13.2 Where there is an offence that continues for more than one day, separate fines, each not

exceeding $10,000, may be imposed for each day, or partial day, that the offence occurs or continues.

13.3 Nothing in this Bylaw shall limit the District from utilizing any other remedy that would

otherwise be available to the District at law. 14. LIQUID WASTE DISPOSAL FEES Replaced by BL 244, 2008; Replaced by BL 277, 2014


14.1 In addition to the fees set out in section 10, the District may charge Industrial Treatment Fees and Liquid Waste Fees as set out in Schedule F.

14.2 Any person required to pay Liquid Waste Fees must apply to the District for credit and if the

Treasurer of the District or that person’s designate is satisfied of the credit worthiness of the person, then the Treasurer of the District or that person’s designate may grant credit to that person, in which case payment of the Liquid Waste Fee shall be made and the credit extended on the following conditions:

(a) the District will invoice Liquid Waste Fees on a monthly basis and the person

receiving credit shall pay the District within 30 days of the invoice date;

(b) the Treasurer of the District or that person’s designate may suspend the credit privileges of any person with an unpaid past due balance.

14.3 Any person required to pay Industrial Treatment Fees will be invoiced by the District on a

quarterly basis and the Industrial Treatment Fees will be due and payable on the date specified on the invoice.

14.4 Any Liquid Waste Fees or Industrial Treatment Fees not paid within 30 days of the invoice

date will be subject to a monthly interest charge of 1.25% per month (15% per annum). 14.5 The remedies for non‐payment of fees provided in this Bylaw are in addition to any other

remedies available to the District at law. 15. GENERAL Added by BL 244, 2008

15.1 The Board may from time to time amend this Bylaw in whole or in part and may without limiting

the generality of the foregoing establish or amend criteria, charges and fees relating to the discharge of Non‐Domestic Waste from specified classes of persons or specific persons.

15.2 If any portion of this Bylaw is deemed ultra vires, illegal, invalid, or unenforceable in any way, in

whole or in part, by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not invalidate or void the remainder of the Bylaw. The parts so held to be ultra vires, illegal, invalid, or unenforceable shall be deemed to be reduced in scope so as to be valid and enforceable, or in the alternative to have been stricken therefrom with the same force and effect as if such parts had never been included in this Bylaw or as revised.

15.3 Nothing in this Bylaw is intended to conflict with the Environmental Management Act.

However, this Bylaw may impose further restrictions and impose further conditions than those imposed by the Environmental Management Act.

15.4 Words importing the singular number include the plural number and vice versa. 15.5 The schedules annexed hereto shall be deemed to be an integral part of this Bylaw.


15.6 This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Sewer Use Bylaw No. 299, 2007”.

Read a FIRST time this

Read a SECOND time this

Read a THIRD time this

Reconsidered, passed and finally adopted by the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District

Board this .

____________________________ ______________________________

Chairperson Secretary

SCHEDULES

A, B, C, E, F, G, & H Revised by BL 276, 2012; Schedule F Replaced by BL 277, 2014

to

Greater Vancouver Sewerage and

Drainage District

SEWER USE BYLAW

NO. 299, 2007


SCHEDULE “A” Revised by BL 276, 2012

PROHIBITED WASTES

The following are designated as Prohibited Wastes: 1. FLAMMABLE OR EXPLOSIVE WASTE Any Waste which is capable of causing or contributing to an explosion or supporting combustion

in any Sewer or Sewage Facility including, but not limited to, gasoline, benzene, naptha, diesel or other fuel oil, waste crankcase oil and sludge resulting from the manufacture of acetylene.

2. WASTE CAUSING OBSTRUCTION OR INTERFERENCE Any Waste which is capable of obstructing the flow of or interfering with the operation or

performance of any Sewer or Sewage Facility including, but not limited to earth, sand, ash, glass, tar, asphalt, plastic, wood, waste portions of animals, fish or fowl, and solidified fat.

3. WASTE CAUSING AIR POLLUTION Any Waste, other than Sanitary Waste, that causes Air Pollution outside any Sewer or Sewage

Facility. 4. HIGH TEMPERATURE CREATING WASTE

a) Any Waste which may create heat in amounts which will interfere with the operation and maintenance of the Sewer and Sewage Facility or with the treatment of Waste in a Sewage Facility;

b) Any Waste which will raise the temperature of Waste entering any Sewage Facility to 40

degrees Centigrade (104 degrees Fahrenheit) or more; c) Any Non‐Domestic Waste with a temperature of 65 degrees Centigrade (150 degrees

Fahrenheit) or more.

5. RADIOACTIVE WASTE (NUCLEAR SUBSTANCES) Waste radioactive substances in excess of quantities or concentrations specified for release to

the environment under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act and Regulations or amended versions thereof, or under a licence issued in accordance with s. 24(1) of the Nuclear Safety and Control Act.


6. BIOMEDICAL WASTE


Any Waste that, at the point of discharge into a sewer, contains Biomedical Waste as defined in the Hazardous Waste Regulation as amended from time to time pursuant to the Environmental Management Act.

7. SPECIFIED RISK MATERIAL FOR BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY

Any Waste containing the specified risk material as defined in the federal Fertilizers Regulations (C.R.C., c. 666), as amended from time to time, including material from the skull, brain, trigeminal ganglia, eyes, tonsils, spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia of cattle aged 30 months or older, or material from the distal ileum of cattle of all ages.

8. HAZARDOUS WASTE

Any waste defined as Hazardous Waste in the Environmental Management Act with the exception of Hazardous Waste in compliance with the effluent standards contained in Schedule 1.2, Column 3 of the Hazardous Waste Regulation.


SCHEDULE “B” Revised by BL 276, 2012

RESTRICTED WASTES Restricted Waste means any of the following: 1. PARTICLE SIZE WASTE Any Non‐Domestic Waste, including that from cooking and handling of food, that at the point of

discharge into a Sewer, contains particles larger than 0.5 centimetres in any dimension. 2. pH WASTE Any Non‐Domestic Waste which, at the point of discharge into a Sewer, has a pH lower than 5.5

or higher than 10.5. 3. SPECIFIED WASTE

Any Wastewater which, at the point of discharge into a Sewer, contains any substance with a concentration in excess of the levels set out in Tables (A), (B) or (C) below. All concentrations are expressed as total concentrations, which include all forms of the contaminant, combined or uncombined, whether dissolved or undissolved obtained from a Grab Sample. Definitions and methods of analysis for these substances are outlined in Standard Methods or methods specified by a Sewage Control Manager.

Table A ‐ Conventional Contaminants

Contaminant Maximum Concentration

(mg/L)

Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) 500

Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 600

Total Oil and Grease1 (O&G – Total) 150

Oil and Grease (Hydrocarbon) (O&G – Hydrocarbon)

15

Note: 1 Total Oil and Grease includes Oil and Grease (Hydrocarbons)


Table B ‐ Organic Contaminants


(mg/L)

Phenols 1.0

Chlorophenols1 0.05

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons2 (PAHs) 0.05

Benzene 0.1

Total BETX3 1.0

Tetrachloroethylene 0.05 Added by BL 244, 2008

Note: 1 Chlorophenols include: tetrachlorophenols (2,3,4,5‐, 2,3,4,6‐, 2,3,5,6‐) pentachlorphenol 2Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) include:

acenapthene chrysene acenaphthylene dibenzo(a,h)anthracene anthracene fluoranthene benzo(a)anthracene fluorene benzo(b)fluoranthene naphthalene benzo(k)fluoranthene phenanthrene benzo(g,h,i)perylene pyrene benzo(a)pyrene indeno(1,2,3‐c,d)pyrene

3BETX include: benzene ethylbenzene toluene xylenes


Table C ‐ Inorganic Contaminants


(mg/L)

Metals

Aluminum 50.0

Arsenic 1.0

Boron 50.0

Cadmium 0.20

Chromium 4.0

Cobalt 5.0

Copper 2.0

Iron 10.0

Lead 1.0

Manganese 5.0

Mercury 0.05

Molybdenum 1.0

Nickel 2.0

Selenium 1.0

Silver 1.0

Zinc 3.0

Other Inorganic Contaminants

Cyanide 1.0

Sulphide 1.0

Sulphate 1500

4. WASTE CAUSING INTERFERENCE OR INJURY

Any Waste in a concentration or quantity which may interfere with the proper operation of a Sewer or Sewage Facility or which may injure or is capable of injuring the health of any person, property, or life form.

5. WASTE PRODUCING AIR CONTAMINANTS

Any Waste, other than Sanitary Waste, that is capable of emitting into the air within a Sewer or Sewage Facility any substance that injures or is capable of injuring the health or safety of a person, or that causes or is capable of causing material physical discomfort to a person.

6. CORROSIVE WASTE

Any Waste with corrosive properties which may cause damage to any Sewer or Sewage Facility.


SCHEDULE “C” Replaced by Bylaw No. 256, 2010; Revised by BL 276, 2012

SCHEDULE OF WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT FEES

Revised by Bylaw No. 244, 2008

1. GENERAL 1.1.1 All fees are payable to the District except for Waste Discharge Permits issued with respect to a

facility located wholly within the geographical boundaries of the City of Vancouver, in which case the fees are payable to the City of Vancouver.

2. FEES 2.1 Permit Application Fee 2.1.1 Each person who applies for a Waste Discharge Permit must pay an application fee (the “Permit

Application Fee”). 2.1.2 The amount of the Permit Application Fee payable is specified in Table A below:

Table A – Permit Application Fees

Application Type Application Fee

Industrial Site $1000

Groundwater Remediation or Construction Excavation Site

$500 – if maximum instantaneous flow ≤ 6 L/s $1000 – if maximum instantaneous flow > 6 L/s

2.1.3 The Permit Application Fee must be paid at the time when an application for a Waste Discharge

Permit is submitted.

2.1.4 The Permit Application Fee is not refundable. 2.2 Permit Amendment Application Fee 2.2.1 Each time a holder of a Waste Discharge Permit applies for an amendment to their Waste

Discharge Permit the holder must pay an amendment application fee (the “Permit Amendment Application Fee”), in the amount specified in Table B below:

Table B – Permit Amendment Application Fees

Application Type Permit Amendment Application Fee

Minor Amendment $250

Major Amendment $500

2.2.2 The following are minor amendments to a Waste Discharge Permit:


a) name and legal address changes; b) monitoring program changes; c) a decrease in the authorized quantity of contaminants or a decrease in the authorized

flow rates; d) a change to the authorized discharge such that, in the opinion of the Sewage Control

Manager, there would be equal or less demand for regulatory and treatment services; or

e) a change in the authorized works or measures such that, in the opinion of the Sewage Control Manager, there would be equal or less demand for regulatory and treatment services.

2.2.3 A major amendment is any amendment that is not a minor amendment.

2.2.4 The Permit Amendment Application Fee is not refundable. 2.3 Permit Administration Fee 2.3.1 The holder of a Waste Discharge Permit must pay an annual administration fee (the “Permit

Administration Fee”) for each Waste Discharge Permit. 2.3.2 Until December 31, 2010, the Permit Administration is $1400. 2.3.3 Effective January 1, 2011, the Permit Administration Fee (Z) is calculated as follows:

Z = $1400 + ($300 x A0.3) + B Where A = maximum daily flow, in cubic metres per day, for the facility, as specified in the Waste Discharge Permit, and Where B = the dollar amount for the industry type, as specified in Table C below:

Table C – Industry Type Fee by North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code

NAICS Description Industry Type Fee

3273 Cement and Concrete Product Manufacturing $900

23 Construction

311 Food Manufacturing $1,800

3121 Beverage Manufacturing

325 Chemical Manufacturing

326 Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing

327 Non‐Metallic Mineral Product Manufacturing (excluding NAICS 3273)

486 Pipeline Transportation

56291 Remediation Services


NAICS Description Industry Type Fee

56292 Material Recovery Facilities

722 Food Services and Drinking Places

81232 Dry Cleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin‐Operated)

91391 Other Local, Municipal and Regional Public Administration

321 Wood Product Manufacturing $2,700

322 Paper manufacturing

418 Miscellaneous Wholesaler‐Distributors

485 Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation

488 Support Activities for Transportation

511 Publishing Industries (except Internet)

541 Professional, Scientific and Technical Services

812921 Photo Finishing Laboratories (except One‐Hour)

331 Primary Metal Manufacturing $3,600

332 Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing

334 Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing

335 Electrical Equipment, Appliance and Component Manufacturing

336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing

416 Building Material and Supplies Wholesaler‐Distributors

417 Machinery, Equipment and Supplies Wholesaler‐Distributors

56221 Waste Treatment and Disposal

3241 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing $4,500

562990 All Other Waste Management Services

2.3.4 In circumstances where it is not clear which industry type the holder of a Waste Discharge

Permit falls within, the Sewage Control Manager may determine the appropriate classification for the purposes of calculating the Permit Administration Fee.

2.3.5 The Permit Administration Fee is payable on issuance of a Waste Discharge Permit and on each

anniversary thereafter. 2.3.6 If the Permit Administration Fee is not paid within 90 days of its due date, the subject Waste

Discharge Permit will be without effect. 2.3.7 Permit Administration Fees falling due in the period from January 1, 2011 until January 1, 2012

will be discounted so that a holder of a Waste Discharge Permit must pay the greater of $1400 or one‐third (1/3) of the Permit Administration Fee calculated in accordance with section 2.3.3.

2.3.8 Permit Administration Fees falling due in the period from January 1, 2012 until January 1, 2013

will be discounted so that a holder of a Waste Discharge Permit must pay the greater of $1400 or two‐thirds (2/3) of the calculated Permit Administration Fee calculated in accordance with section 2.3.3.

2.3.9 After January 1, 2013 100% of the Permit Administration Fee will be payable.


2.4 Waste Discharge Permits Issued for Periods of Less Than 365 Days 2.4.1 Where a Waste Discharge Permit is issued for a period of less than 365 days, the Permit

Administration Fee (at the rate applicable of the date the Permit Administration Fee is payable) will be adjusted in accordance with Table D:

Table D – Adjustment to the Permit Administration Fee for Waste Discharge Permits issued less than 365 days

Period of Time Permit Administration Fee will be discounted by:

less than 7 days 90% 7 days ‐ 30 days 80% 31 days ‐ 90 days 60% 91 days ‐ 180 days 40% 181 days ‐ 270 days 20% 271 days ‐ 365 days No discount

2.5 Remedies Not Limited 2.5.1 The remedies for non‐payment of fees provided in this Bylaw are in addition to any other

remedies available to the District at law.


SCHEDULE “D” Deleted by BL 276, 2012


SCHEDULE “E” Revised by BL 276, 2012

CODE OF PRACTICE FOR DENTAL OPERATIONS

1. PURPOSE

Pursuant to section 5.2 of the Bylaw, this Code of Practice for Dental Operations sets out the requirements for managing Non‐Domestic Waste discharged directly or indirectly from a Dental Operation into a Sewer or a Sewage Facility.

2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 In this Code of Practice the following meanings apply:

“Certified Amalgam Separator” means any Amalgam Separator that is certified in accordance with ISO Standard ISO/FDIS 11143: (1999) for “Dental Equipment – Amalgam Separators” established by the International Organization of Standardization or any alternative deemed equivalent or better by the Sewage Control Manager; “Dental Amalgam” means a dental filling material consisting of an amalgam containing any of the following:

(a) mercury, (b) silver,

(c) copper,

(d) tin, or

(e) zinc;

“Dental Operation” means any operation that carries out dental care, dental hygiene, dental laboratory activities, or dental school.

3. APPLICATION 3.1 This Code of Practice applies to Dental Operations that produce Non‐Domestic Waste containing

Dental Amalgam. If work in a dental office is limited to work that does not involve placing or removing Dental Amalgam then this Code of Practice does not apply.

3.2 Notwithstanding this Code of Practice, a Sewage Control Manager may issue an Order for any of

the purposes identified in section 1 of the Bylaw. 3.3 A Sewage Control Manager may issue a Waste Discharge Permit to a person that owns or

operates a Dental Operation authorizing the discharge of Non‐Domestic Waste.


4. REQUIREMENTS 4.1 On or before July 1, 2008, all Dental Operations that discharge Wastewater containing Dental

Amalgam to Sewer shall install a Certified Amalgam Separator according to manufacturer’s or supplier’s instructions and specifications. After July 1, 2008, no Dental Operation shall discharge Non‐Domestic Waste containing Dental Amalgam to Sewer unless the Non‐Domestic Waste has been treated using the Certified Amalgam Separator prior to discharge to Sewer.

4.2 The discharge from a Certified Amalgam Separator may not contain Restricted Wastes other

than the Restricted Wastes contained in Dental Amalgam: mercury, silver, copper or zinc. 4.3 The Certified Amalgam Separator shall have a design and capacity appropriate for the size and

type of vacuum system in use. 4.4 An owner or operator of a Dental Operation shall operate and maintain the Certified Amalgam

Separator according to the manufacturer’s or supplier’s instructions and specifications. 4.5 An owner or operator of a Dental Operation shall allow the District to inspect the vacuum

system, Certified Amalgam Separator, and Amalgam Waste storage areas upon request, at any time during the ordinary business hours of the Dental Operation.

5. RECORD KEEPING AND RETENTION 5.1 An operator of a Dental Operation shall maintain records of the Certified Amalgam Separator

maintenance including:

- Date of service - Name and contact information of person servicing or maintaining the Certified Amalgam

Separator - Approximate quantity of Waste removed - Name and contact information of person accepting the Waste from the Certified Amalgam

Separator - Observations regarding the performance of the equipment

5.2 An operator of a Dental Operation shall maintain these records for a minimum of three years

and shall make these records available to an Officer upon request at any time during the ordinary business hours of the Dental Operation.

6. EXEMPTIONS 6.1 An operator of a Dental Operation may request an exemption to a particular requirement of this

Code of Practice by submitting a written request to the Sewage Control Manager setting out in detail the reasons for the request for exemption. A Sewage Control Manager may approve, deny or approve on terms and conditions such a request.

6.2 A Sewage Control Manager may, by Waste Discharge Permit or Order, on his or her initiative,

exempt an operator of a Dental Operation from any requirements of this Code of Practice.


SCHEDULE “F” Added by BL 244, 2008; Revised by BL 252, 2009; Replaced by BL 256, 2010; Revised by BL 265, 2012; Replaced by BL 277, 2014

LIQUID WASTE FEES

SEPTIC TANK WASTE AND TRUCKED WASTE FEES

1.1 The Liquid Waste Fees for disposal of Septic Tank Waste or Trucked Waste are:

Septic Tank Waste $8.59 per cubic metre

Trucked Waste $61.30 per cubic metre

2. INDUSTRIAL TREATMENT FEES

2.1 The Industrial Treatment Fee consists of:

(a) the total usage charge (UCtot); and

(b) the total capacity charge (CCtot),

calculated in accordance with the formulae set out in this section (section 2).

A. Usage Charge

2.2. The total usage charge (UCtot) is the sum of the following, calculated on a quarterly basis in

each calendar year:

(a) the usage charge for volume of Non‐Domestic Waste (UCvol), calculated in accordance

with section 2.3; and

(b) the usage charge for the mass of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (“BOD”) (UCBOD) and

Total Suspended Solids (“TSS”) (UCTSS), calculated in accordance with sections 2.4 and

2.5.

UCtot = UCvol + UCBOD + UCTSS

2.3. The usage charge for the volume of Non‐Domestic Waste discharged is calculated using the

following formula:

UCvol = Vq x UCRvol

Where:

UCvol = usage charge for volume, in dollars ($).


Vq = volume of non‐domestic wastewater discharged in the quarter, in cubic metres

(m3).

UCRvol = usage charge rate for volume for the sewerage area where the premises

covered by the Waste Discharge Permit are located, in dollars per cubic metre ($/m3), as

determined by the District.

2.4. The usage charge for the mass of BOD discharged is calculated using the following formula:

UCBOD = CBOD x Vq x UCRBOD

1000

Where:

UCBOD = usage charge for the mass of BOD discharged in dollars ($).

CBOD = average concentration of BOD, in milligrams per litre (mg/L).


(m3).

UCRBOD = usage charge rate for BOD for the sewerage area where the premises covered

by the Waste Discharge Permit are located, in dollars per kilogram ($/kg), as determined

by the District.

2.5. The usage charge for the mass of TSS discharged is calculated using the following formula:

UCTSS = CTSS x Vq x UCRTSS

1000

Where:

UCTSS = usage charge for the mass of TSS discharged in dollars ($).

CTSS = average concentration of TSS, in milligrams per litre (mg/L).


(m3).

UCRTSS = usage charge rate for TSS for the sewerage area where the premises covered by

the Waste Discharge Permit are located, in dollars per kilogram ($/kg), as determined by

the District.


2.6. If the holder of a Waste Discharge Permit fails to keep records and provide information

required to be submitted by a Waste Discharge Permit to calculate the usage charge, then

the Sewage Control Manager may, in his or her discretion, deem the volumes of non‐

domestic wastewater, BOD, and TSS concentrations to calculate the total usage charge.

B. Capacity Charge

2.7. The total capacity charge (CCtot) is the sum of the following, calculated on an annual basis

and invoiced on a quarterly basis in four equal instalments:

(a) the capacity charge for volume (CCvol) of Non‐Domestic Waste discharged in the

previous calendar year, calculated in accordance with section 2.8; and

(b) the capacity charge for BOD (CCBOD) and TSS (CCTSS) discharged in the previous calendar

year, calculated in accordance with sections 2.9 and 2.10,

2.8. The capacity charge for volume (CCvol) is calculated using the following formula:

CCvol = VM x CCRvol

Where:

CCvol = capacity charge for volume of Non‐Domestic Waste discharged, in dollars ($).

VM = the twelve month average of the maximum daily volumes reported for each month

in the previous calendar year, in cubic metres per day (m3/d).

CCRvol = capacity charge rate for volume for the sewerage area where the premises

covered by the Waste Discharge Permit are located, in dollars per cubic metres per day

($/m3/d), as determined by the District.

2.9. The mass of BOD and TSS discharged during the sample day are calculated using the

following formulae:

MBOD = CBOD x Vs

1000

MTSS = CTSS x Vs

1000


Where:

MBOD = mass of BOD discharged during the sample day, in kilograms per day (kg/day).

MTSS = mass of TSS discharged during the sample day, in kilograms per day (kg/day).

CBOD = concentration of BOD in the sample, in milligrams per litre (mg/L).

CTSS = concentration of TSS in the sample, in milligrams per litre (mg/L).

Vs = volume of Non‐Domestic Waste discharged during the day that the sample was

collected, in cubic metres (m3/d).

2.10. The capacity charges for BOD (CCBOD) and TSS (CCTSS) are calculated by determining the

ninetieth (90th) percentile of the daily sample masses for BOD and TSS of all samples

measured in the previous calendar year and using the following formulae:

CCBOD = M90‐BOD x CCRBOD

CCTSS = M90‐TSS x CCRTSS

Where:

CCBOD = capacity charge for BOD, in dollars ($).

CCTSS = capacity charge for TSS, in dollars ($).

M90‐BOD = the 90th percentile of the daily sample masses of BOD (MBOD) measured in the

previous calendar year, in kilograms per day (kg/d).

M90‐TSS = the 90th percentile of the daily sample masses of TSS (MTSS) measured in the

previous calendar year, in kilograms per day (kg/d).

CCRBOD = capacity charge rate for BOD for the sewerage area where the premises

covered by the Waste Discharge Permit are located, in dollars per kilogram per day

($/kg/d), as determined by the District.

CCRTSS = capacity charge rate for TSS for the sewerage area where the premises covered

by the Waste Discharge Permit are located, in dollars per kilogram per day ($/kg/d), as

determined by the District.

3. Effective Date

3.1 This Schedule comes into effect as of January 1, 2014, for the purpose of calculating the

Industrial Treatment Fees for the first quarter of 2014 and onwards.


SCHEDULE “G”

Added by BL 244, 2008; Revised by BL 276, 2012

CODE OF PRACTICE FOR DRY CLEANING OPERATIONS USING TETRACHLOROETHYLENE

1. PURPOSE Pursuant to section 5.2 of the Bylaw, this Code of Practice for Dry Cleaning Operations using Tetrachloroethylene, sets out the requirements for managing Non‐Domestic Waste containing Tetrachloroethylene discharged directly or indirectly from a Dry Cleaning Operation into a Sewer or a Sewage Facility.

2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 In this Code of Practice the following meanings apply:

"Activated Carbon" means treated or prepared granular carbon capable of removing organic compounds and other substances from Waste or Wastewater through the processes of adsorption and absorption; "Dry Cleaning Operation" means any commercial, industrial or institutional operation or a public authority engaged in the cleaning of textile and apparel goods, rugs, furs, leathers and other similar articles using Tetrachloroethylene; "Tetrachloroethylene‐Contaminated Residue" means any solid, liquid or sludge containing Tetrachloroethylene, other than Wastewater, that is produced by a Dry Cleaning Operation; and

"Tetrachloroethylene/Water Separator" means equipment used to separate Tetrachloroethylene and water by gravity.

3. APPLICATION 3.1 This Code of Practice applies to any Dry Cleaning Operation discharging Non‐Domestic Waste

containing Tetrachloroethylene directly or indirectly into a Sewer or Sewage Facility. 3.2 Notwithstanding this Code of Practice, a Sewage Control Manager may issue an Order for any of

the purposes identified in section 1 of the Bylaw. 3.3 A Sewage Control Manager may issue a Waste Discharge Permit authorizing the discharge of

Non‐Domestic Waste to a person that owns or operates a Dry Cleaning Operation. 4. REQUIREMENTS 4.1 On the date of adoption of this Code of Practice, the owner or operator of a dry cleaning

machine discharging Non‐Domestic Waste containing Tetrachloroethylene to Sewer must, in addition to the dry cleaning machine’s integral Tetrachloroethylene/Water Separator, install and maintain the following treatment works:


(a) a second Tetrachloroethylene/Water Separator that recovers Tetrachloroethylene from

the Wastewater exiting the integral Tetrachloroethylene/Water Separator;

(b) an initial filter containing Activated Carbon that removes the Tetrachloroethylene from the Wastewater exiting the second Tetrachloroethylene/Water Separator,

(c) a monitor‐alarm that automatically shuts down the Wastewater treatment system and

stops the discharge of Wastewater containing Tetrachloroethylene into the Sewer when the initial filter becomes saturated with Tetrachloroethylene; and

(d) a second filter containing Activated Carbon that removes Tetrachloroethylene from the

Wastewater after it passes through the initial filter and past the monitor‐alarm. 4.2 An operator of a Dry Cleaning Operation who operates the Tetrachloroethylene/Water

Separators referred to in section 4.1 must visually inspect all Tetrachloroethylene/Water Separators on a daily basis to ensure that the level of Tetrachloroethylene does not reach the Wastewater outlet of the separators.

4.3 If the level of the Tetrachloroethylene referred to in section 4.2 reaches the Wastewater outlet

of the separator, an operator of a Dry Cleaning Operation must:

(a) cease operation to prevent the discharge of Tetrachloroethylene from the Tetrachloroethylene/Water Separator;

(b) clean the Tetrachloroethylene/Water Separator in accordance with manufacturer’s

recommendations; and (c) return the Tetrachloroethylene from the separator to the solvent recovery system or

collect and store it for off‐site waste management. 4.4 An operator of a Dry Cleaning Operation who installs the Activated Carbon filters referred to in

sections 4.1(b) and (d) must replace both the initial and second filter containing Activated Carbon at least once every 12 months or when one of the following occurs:

(a) on or before reaching the manufacturer’s or supplier’s recommended expiry date; or (b) when the monitor‐alarm referred to in section 4.1(c) has been triggered.

5. STORAGE AND CONTAINMENT 5.1 An operator of a Dry Cleaning Operation must ensure that all dry cleaning machines and

treatment works are located and operated within a Tetrachloroethylene‐impermeable secondary spill containment system that will prevent any spilled material from entering a Sewer.

5.2 An operator of a Dry Cleaning Operation must store all new and used Tetrachloroethylene,

Tetrachloroethylene‐Contaminated Residue and untreated Wastewater within a


Tetrachloroethylene‐impermeable spill containment system that will prevent any spilled material from entering a Sewer.

5.3 The containment systems identified in sections 5.1 and 5.2 must encompass at least the entire

surface under each dry cleaning machine, tank or other container containing Tetrachloroethylene, Wastewater or Tetrachloroethylene‐Contaminated Residue and be sufficient to hold at least 110% of the capacity of the largest tank, container or works within the containment system.

5.4 Drains located within the containment system must be sealed with Tetrachloroethylene‐

resistant drain plugs. 6. RECORD KEEPING AND RETENTION 6.1 An operator of a Dry Cleaning Operation who installs the treatment works to enable the

discharge of Wastewater to Sewer must keep a record of all inspection and maintenance activities for the treatment works, including the:

(a) date of inspection or maintenance; and (b) description of inspection or maintenance conducted;

6.2 An operator of a Dry Cleaning Operation must maintain records of all purchases of

Tetrachloroethylene, and of all disposals or recycling of Tetrachloroethylene contaminated waste products. These records must include:

(a) name, civic and postal address, and telephone number of each supplier, disposal or

recycling company or facility used by the Dry Cleaning Operation; (b) quantity of Tetrachloroethylene purchased (in kilograms); (b) type of material transferred to each company or facility; (c) quantity of material transferred to each company or facility (in kilograms); and (d) date of material transferred to each company or facility.

6.3 The records required under sections 6.1 and 6.2 must be retained at the principle place of

business for a period of five years and must be available for inspection on request by an Officer. 6.4 The Sewage Control Manager may require an operator of a Dry Cleaning Operation to undertake

an audit by a qualified professional to verify the degree of compliance with this Code of Practice. 6.5 The operator of a Dry Cleaning Operation must immediately report to the Sewage Control

Manager any accidental releases of Tetrachloroethylene to Sewer and shall forthwith undertake all remedial action that is available to minimize the effect of such discharges.


SCHEDULE “H”

Added by BL 244, 2008; Revised by BL 276, 2012

CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGING OPERATIONS USING SILVER

1. PURPOSE Pursuant to section 5.2 of the Bylaw, this Code of Practice for Photographic Imaging Operations sets out the requirements for managing Non‐Domestic Waste discharged directly or indirectly from a Photographic Imaging Operation into a Sewer or a Sewage Facility. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 In this Code of Practice the following meanings apply:

"Chemical Recovery Cartridge" means a cartridge capable of removing silver from silver‐bearing Wastewater through the principle of metallic replacement;

"Electrolytic Recovery" means a method of recovering silver from silver‐bearing Wastewater by passing a direct electrical current between electrodes suspended in the Wastewater; "Photographic Imaging Operation" means any operation which carries out photographic film processing or printing that uses silver in image forming or creates waste containing silver; "Silver Recovery System" means the combination of holding tanks, metering pumps, plumbing and silver recovery technology which is used to treat Wastewater containing silver produced by Photographic Imaging Operations. "Silver Recovery Technology" means equipment that is designed to recover silver from Wastewater produced by photographic imaging operations using such methods as metallic replacement, electrolysis, ion exchange or chemical precipitation including: electrolytic units, chemical recovery cartridges, chemical precipitation units and ion exchange units. “Silver‐Rich Solution” is a solution containing sufficient silver such that effective recovery can be done either on‐site or off‐site. Within photographic processing facilities, such solutions include, but are not limited to, fix and bleach‐fix solutions, stabilizers, low replenished (low‐flow) washes, and all functionally‐similar solutions. It does not include low silver concentration solutions such as used developers, bleaches, stop baths, pre‐bleaches, and stabilizers following washes and wash waters.

3. APPLICATION 3.1 This Code of Practice applies to Photographic Imaging Operations that discharge Non‐Domestic

Waste containing silver directly or indirectly into a Sewer or Sewage Facility.


3.2 Notwithstanding this Code of Practice, a Sewage Control Manager may issue an Order for any of the purposes identified in section 1 of the Bylaw.

3.3 A Sewage Control Manager may issue a Waste Discharge Permit to a person that owns or

operates a Photographic Imaging Operation authorizing the discharge of Non‐Domestic Waste. 4. REQUIREMENTS 4.1 On or before January 1, 2009, an operator of a Photographic Imaging Operation that discharges

Non‐Domestic Waste containing silver must treat the Waste at the Photographic Imaging Operation site prior to discharge to the Sewer using one of the following Silver Recovery Technologies:

(a) two Chemical Recovery Cartridges connected in a series; or (b) an Electrolytic Recovery unit followed by two Chemical Recovery Cartridges connected

in series; or (c) any other Silver Recovery Technology, or combination of technologies that is capable of

reducing the concentration of silver in the Wastewater to 5 mg/L or less and is acceptable to the Sewage Control Manager.

4.2 The discharge from a Photographic Imaging Operation may not contain Restricted Wastes other

than the following:

(a) iron; and (b) sulphate

4.3 The discharge from a Photographic Imaging Operation may not contain silver in a concentration

that is in excess of 5 milligrams per litre (mg/L) as analyzed by a Grab Sample.

4.4 An operator of a Photographic Imaging Operation must install, operate and maintain the Silver Recovery System according to the manufacturer’s or supplier’s instructions and specifications.

4.5 An operator of a Photographic Imaging Operation must locate the Silver Recovery System in such a manner that an accidental spill, leak or container failure will not result in Wastewater containing silver in concentrations greater than 5.0 mg/L entering any Sewer.

4.6 An operator of a Photographic Imaging Operation must test the discharge to Sewer annually to

confirm the effectiveness and efficiency of the Silver Recovery System and to confirm compliance with section 4.3.

4.7 An owner or operator of a Photographic Imaging Operation shall allow the inspection of the

Silver Recovery System upon request by an Officer at any time during the ordinary business hours of the Photographic Imaging Operation.


5. RECORD KEEPING AND RETENTION 5.1 An operator of a Photographic Imaging Operation shall maintain records of all:

a) Silver Recovery System maintenance and inspections including:

i) date of service; ii) description of service; and

iii) Name and contact information of person servicing or maintaining the Silver

Recovery System;

b) Silver monitoring test results. 5.2 An operator of a Photographic Imaging Operation shall maintain these records for a minimum of

three years and shall make these records available to an Officer upon request at any time during the ordinary business hours of the Photographic Imaging Operation.

5.3 The Sewage Control Manager may require an operator of a Photographic Imaging Operation to

undertake an audit by a qualified professional to verify the degree of compliance with this Code of Practice.

5.4 The operator of a Photographic Imaging Operation must immediately report to the Sewage

Control Manager any accidental releases of Silver Rich Solutions to Sewer and shall forthwith undertake all remedial action that is available to minimize the effect of such discharges.

Appendix H: Geotechnical Terms of Reference and

Environmental Standard Limitations

Version 5 - March 09, 2007 Page 1 of 2

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS ISSUED BY LEVELTON CONSULTANTS LTD. 1. STANDARD OF CARE Levelton Consultants Ltd. (“Levelton”) prepared and issued this geotechnical report (the “Report”) for its client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally-accepted engineering consulting practices for the geotechnical discipline. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Unless specifically stated in the Report, the Report does not address environmental issues. The terms of reference for geotechnical reports issued by Levelton (the “Terms of Reference”) contained in the present document provide additional information and caution related to standard of care and the use of the Report. The Client should read and familiarize itself with these Terms of Reference.

2. COMPLETENESS OF THE REPORT All documents, records, drawings, correspondence, data, files and deliverables, whether hard copy, electronic or otherwise, generated as part of the services for the Client are inherent components of the Report and, collectively, form the instruments of professional services (the “Instruments of Professional Services”). The Report is of a summary nature and is not intended to stand alone without reference to the instructions given to Levelton by the Client, the communications between Levelton and the Client, and to any other reports, writings, proposals or documents prepared by Levelton for the Client relative to the specific site described in the Report, all of which constitute the Report. TO PROPERLY UNDERSTAND THE INFORMATION, OBSERVATIONS, FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND OPINIONS CONTAINED IN THE REPORT, REFERENCE MUST BE MADE TO THE WHOLE OF THE REPORT. LEVELTON CANNOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR USE BY ANY PARTY OF PORTIONS OF THE REPORT WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE WHOLE REPORT AND ITS VARIOUS COMPONENTS. 3. BASIS OF THE REPORT Levelton prepared the Report for the Client for the specific site, development, building, design or building assessment objectives and purpose that the Client described to Levelton. The applicability and reliability of any of the information, observations, findings, suggestions, recommendations and opinions contained in the Report are only valid to the extent that there was no material alteration to or variation from any of the said descriptions provided by the Client to Levelton unless the Client specifically requested Levelton to review and revise the Report in light of such alteration or variation. 4. USE OF THE REPORT The information, observations, findings, suggestions, recommendations and opinions contained in the Report, or any component forming the Report, are for the sole use and benefit of the Client and the team of consultants selected by the Client for the specific project that the Report was provided. NO OTHER PARTY MAY USE OR RELY UPON THE REPORT OR ANY PORTION OR COMPONENT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF LEVELTON. Levelton will consent to any reasonable request by the Client to approve the use of this Report by other parties designated by the Client as the “Approved Users”. As a condition for the consent of Levelton to approve the use of the Report by an Approved User, the Client must provide a copy of these Terms of Reference to that Approved User and the Client must obtain written confirmation from that Approved User that the Approved User will comply with these Terms of Reference, such written confirmation to be provided separately by each Approved User prior to beginning use of the Report. The Client will provide Levelton with a copy of the written confirmation from an Approved User when it becomes available to the Client, and in any case, within two weeks of the Client receiving such written confirmation. The Report and all its components remain the copyright property of Levelton and Levelton authorises only the Client and the Approved Users to make copies of the Report, but only in such quantities as are reasonably necessary for the use of the Report by the Client and the Approved Users. The Client and the Approved Users may not give, lend, sell or otherwise disseminate or make the Report, or any portion thereof, available to any party without the written permission of Levelton. Any use which a third party makes of the Report, or any portion of the Report, is the sole responsibility of such third parties. Levelton accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party resulting from the use of the Report. The Client and the Approved Users acknowledge and agree to indemnify and hold harmless Levelton, its officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives or sub-consultants, or any or all of them, against any claim of any nature whatsoever brought against Levelton by any third parties, whether in contract or in tort, arising or related to the use of contents of the Report.

Version 5 - March 09, 2007 Page 2 of 2

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS ISSUED BY LEVELTON CONSULTANTS LTD. (continued) 5. INTERPRETATION OF THE REPORT a. Nature and Exactness of Descriptions: The classification and identification of soils, rocks and

geological units, as well as engineering assessments and estimates have been based on investigations performed in accordance with the standards set out in Paragraph 1 above. The classification and identification of these items are judgmental in nature and even comprehensive sampling and testing programs, implemented with the appropriate equipment by experienced personnel, may fail to locate some conditions. All investigations or assessments utilizing the standards of Paragraph 1 involve an inherent risk that some conditions will not be detected and all documents or records summarizing such investigations will be based on assumptions of what exists between the actual points sampled. Actual conditions may vary significantly between the points investigated and all persons making use of such documents or records should be aware of, and accept, this risk. Some conditions are subject to changes over time and the parties making use of the Report should be aware of this possibility and understand that the Report only presents the conditions at the sampled points at the time of sampling. Where special concerns exist, or when the Client has special considerations or requirements, the Client must disclose them to Levelton so that additional or special investigations may be undertaken, which would not otherwise be within the scope of investigations made by Levelton or the purposes of the Report.

b. Reliance on information: The evaluation and conclusions contained in the Report have been prepared on the basis of conditions in evidence at the time of site investigation and field review and on the basis of information provided to Levelton. Levelton has relied in good faith upon representations, information and instructions provided by the Client and others concerning the site. Accordingly, Levelton cannot accept responsibility for any deficiency, misstatement or inaccuracy contained in the report as a result of misstatements, omissions, misrepresentations or fraudulent acts of persons providing information.

c. Additional Involvement by Levelton: To avoid misunderstandings, Levelton should be retained to assist other professionals to explain relevant engineering findings and to review the geotechnical aspects of the plans, drawings and specifications of other professionals relative to the engineering issues pertaining to the geotechnical consulting services provided by Levelton. To ensure compliance and consistency with the applicable building codes, legislation, regulations, guidelines and generally-accepted practices, Levelton should also be retained to provide field review services during the performance of any related work. Where applicable, it is understood that such field review services must meet or exceed the minimum necessary requirements to ascertain that the work being carried out is in general conformity with the recommendations made by Levelton. Any reduction from the level of services recommended by Levelton will result in Levelton providing qualified opinions regarding adequacy of the work.

6. ALTERNATE REPORT FORMAT When Levelton submits both electronic and hard copy versions of the Instruments of Professional Services, the Client agrees that only the signed and sealed hard copy versions shall be considered final and legally binding upon Levelton. The hard copy versions submitted by Levelton shall be the original documents for record and working purposes, and, in the event of a dispute or discrepancy, the hard copy versions shall govern over the electronic versions; furthermore, the Client agrees and waives all future right of dispute that the original hard copy signed and sealed versions of the Instruments of Professional Services maintained or retained, or both, by Levelton shall be deemed to be the overall originals for the Project. The Client agrees that the electronic file and hard copy versions of Instruments of Professional Services shall not, under any circumstances, no matter who owns or uses them, be altered by any party except Levelton. The Client warrants that the Instruments of Professional Services will be used only and exactly as submitted by Levelton. The Client recognizes and agrees that Levelton prepared and submitted electronic files using specific software or hardware systems, or both. Levelton makes no representation about the compatibility of these files with the current or future software and hardware systems of the Client, the Approved Users or any other party. The Client further agrees that Levelton is under no obligation, unless otherwise expressly specified, to provide the Client, the Approved Users and any other party, or any or all of them, with specific software and hardware systems that are compatible with any electronic submitted by Levelton. The Client further agrees that should the Client, an Approved User or a third party require Levelton to provide specific software or hardware systems, or both, compatible with the electronic files prepared and submitted by Levelton, for any reason whatsoever included but not restricted to an order from a court, then the Client will pay Levelton for all reasonable costs related to the provision of the specific software or hardware systems, or both. The Client further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Levelton, its officers, directors, employees, agents, representative or sub-consultant, or any or all of them, against any claim or any nature whatsoever brought against Levelton, whether in contract or in tort, arising or related to the provision or use or any specific software or hardware provided by Levelton.

STANDARD LIMITATIONS

1. The findings and conclusions documented in this report have been prepared for specific applicationto this project and have been developed in a manner consistent with that level of care normallyexercised by environmental professionals currently practicing under similar conditions in the area.

2. The findings of this report are based solely on data collected on-Site during this investigation and onthe conditions of the Site during the completion of the work. Levelton has relied on good faith oninformation provided by individuals and sources noted in the report. No other warranty, expressedor implied, is made.

3. If new information is developed in future work that affects the conclusions of this report, Leveltonshould be contacted to re-evaluate the conclusions of this report and provide amendments asrequired.

4. The service provided by Levelton in completing this report is intended to assist the client in a businessdecision. The liability of the Site is not transferred to Levelton as a result of such services, and Leveltondoes not make recommendation regarding the purchase, sale, or investment in the property.

ps20150202 - feasibility study for glen pump station

Documents