prt braga poster edtna 2016 new interest in an old idea ......1. almeida, j., 1985, “a adaptação...

1
45 th EDTNA/ERCA International Conference – Valencia, September 17-20, 2016 Objectives To explore the dynamics of: Haemodialysis patients' empowerment in self-care Improved ability of patients to take control of their haemodialysis treatment. Methods A study case of a couple of patients who actively participated in a partial self-care programme. Data from semi-structured interviews with open-questions were evaluated by means of content analysis. This quality survey allowed us to assess the starting point of a shared care haemodialysis of a woman and a man at the same age (53 years) who have been undergoing haemodialysis for more than two decades, both with arteriovenous fistula and with a transplant rejection. The aetiology of the disease - in the female participant - was a systemic lupus erythematosus and nephrotic syndrome - in the male participant, respectively. They have the same socio- economic background. The man is still active as a craftsman, and the woman retired several years ago. Both are married and have a strong support of family and friends. Results Our results have shown that dialysis patients who take an active role in their treatment tend to have better clinical outcomes, have a better subjective control of their lives and an increased self-esteem from providing their own care. Self-management has been defined as the positive efforts of patients to monitor and participate in their health care, e.g. setting up their dialysis machines, in order to improve their health, prevent complications, control symptoms, and minimise impairment caused by the disease to their preferred lifestyles. Reports from our participants showed how their participation in a partial self-care programme in haemodialysis positively affected their autonomy. As one participant stated, “You know when you are put in a category of a patient, whatever this is, you are seen as a puppet that looses every possibility of having the reins of life; in a certain way you are put in a place with its own rules. I want to oppose those rules, you know. But I want to prove that, because I am dependent to a machine, it doesn’t mean that it is the end of me. I am still in command”. The patients’ willingness to become involved in managing their own care is closely linked to their ability of setting goals and their hope for the future. Conclusion Active participation in the haemodialysis treatment has improved the quality life of these two patients, due to increasing confidence and control, self-esteem and freedom, and as a result of increased understanding and knowledge. This has been highlighted through the qualitative evaluation. Patients reported that the common responsibility in the treatment is associated with better dialysis sessions and outcomes. Moreover, results have consistently shown that the patients’ behaviour cannot be successfully modified unless patients set their own goals and internalize the need for change. Another important finding is represented by the decreased symptoms during the dialysis session, such as hypotension and mainly muscle cramps. Future interventions should increase the patients' overall participation in care and self-management. Patients’ partnership with the clinic staff and the shared responsibility in the dialysis treatment is a source of respect for patients. References 1. Almeida, J., 1985, “A adaptação do Insuficiente Renal Crónico à Hemodiálise: estudo da influência da personalidade e das matrizes familiares, sócio-cultural e terapeutica”, Faculdade de Ciências de Lisboa, Portugal 2. Henriques, V., 2009, “Hemodiálise: Viver com qualidade ou Viver com a Qualidade”, Editors NephroCare, Portugal, Fresenius Medical Care 3. Scribner, B., 1974, “Panel: living or dying”, Springfield, Charles Thomas Publications 4. World Health Organization, WHO-IASSID Work Plan, 2011, “Quality of life: It´s conceptualization, measurement and application. A Concensus Document”, Geneva, Switzerland New interest in an old idea: shared care as an option for dialysis nursing Virgínia Henriques 1 , Filomena Vieira 1 , A. Castro Henriques 1 , João Fazendeiro Matos 2 , Maria Teresa Parisotto 3 1 Fresenius Medical Care, Dialysis Centre NephroCare, Braga – Portugal; 2 Fresenius Medical Care, NephroCare Head Office, Porto – Portugal; 3 Fresenius Medical Care, Nursing Care Coordination, Bad Homburg – Germany Table 1: Views on shared care haemodialysis expressed by patient Quality Domains of Healthcare Open Questions Introduction Dialysis patients traditionally had access to education programmes related to the different aspects and areas of the illness and its treatment. The ultimate purpose is to provide appropriate resources, training, and support to ensure the best possible quality of care and well-being of chronic patients. Scientific literature of the clinical practice suggests that patients' self-management and knowledge about their treatment may impact functionality and well-being associated with a decreased risk of hospitalisation and mortality.

Upload: others

Post on 24-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PRT Braga Poster EDTNA 2016 New interest in an old idea ......1. Almeida, J., 1985, “A adaptação do Insuficiente Renal Crónico à Hemodiálise: estudo da influência da personalidade

45th EDTNA/ERCA International Conference – Valencia, September 17-20, 2016

ObjectivesTo explore the dynamics of:• Haemodialysis patients' empowerment in self-care• Improved ability of patients to take control of their

haemodialysis treatment.

MethodsA study case of a couple of patients who actively participated ina partial self-care programme. Data from semi-structuredinterviews with open-questions were evaluated by means ofcontent analysis. This quality survey allowed us to assess thestarting point of a shared care haemodialysis of a woman and aman at the same age (53 years) who have been undergoinghaemodialysis for more than two decades, both witharteriovenous fistula and with a transplant rejection. Theaetiology of the disease - in the female participant - was asystemic lupus erythematosus and nephrotic syndrome - in themale participant, respectively. They have the same socio-economic background. The man is still active as a craftsman, andthe woman retired several years ago. Both are married and havea strong support of family and friends.

ResultsOur results have shown that dialysis patients who take an active role in their treatment tend to have better clinical outcomes, have abetter subjective control of their lives and an increased self-esteem from providing their own care. Self-management has beendefined as the positive efforts of patients to monitor and participate in their health care, e.g. setting up their dialysis machines, inorder to improve their health, prevent complications, control symptoms, and minimise impairment caused by the disease to theirpreferred lifestyles. Reports from our participants showed how their participation in a partial self-care programme in haemodialysispositively affected their autonomy. As one participant stated, “You know when you are put in a category of a patient, whatever thisis, you are seen as a puppet that looses every possibility of having the reins of life; in a certain way you are put in a place with itsown rules. I want to oppose those rules, you know. But I want to prove that, because I am dependent to a machine, it doesn’t meanthat it is the end of me. I am still in command”. The patients’ willingness to become involved in managing their own care is closelylinked to their ability of setting goals and their hope for the future.

ConclusionActive participation in the haemodialysis treatment has improved the quality life of these two patients, due to increasing confidenceand control, self-esteem and freedom, and as a result of increased understanding and knowledge. This has been highlighted throughthe qualitative evaluation. Patients reported that the common responsibility in the treatment is associated with better dialysissessions and outcomes. Moreover, results have consistently shown that the patients’ behaviour cannot be successfully modifiedunless patients set their own goals and internalize the need for change. Another important finding is represented by the decreasedsymptoms during the dialysis session, such as hypotension and mainly muscle cramps. Future interventions should increase thepatients' overall participation in care and self-management. Patients’ partnership with the clinic staff and the shared responsibility inthe dialysis treatment is a source of respect for patients.

References1. Almeida, J., 1985, “A adaptação do Insuficiente Renal Crónico à Hemodiálise: estudo da influência da personalidade e das matrizes familiares, sócio-cultural e terapeutica”, Faculdade de Ciências de Lisboa,

Portugal2. Henriques, V., 2009, “Hemodiálise: Viver com qualidade ou Viver com a Qualidade”, Editors NephroCare, Portugal, Fresenius Medical Care3. Scribner, B., 1974, “Panel: living or dying”, Springfield, Charles Thomas Publications4. World Health Organization, WHO-IASSID Work Plan, 2011, “Quality of life: It´s conceptualization, measurement and application. A Concensus Document”, Geneva, Switzerland

New interest in an old idea: shared care as an option for dialysis nursingVirgínia Henriques1, Filomena Vieira1, A. Castro Henriques1, João Fazendeiro Matos2, Maria Teresa Parisotto3

1Fresenius Medical Care, Dialysis Centre NephroCare, Braga – Portugal; 2Fresenius Medical Care, NephroCare Head Office, Porto – Portugal; 3Fresenius Medical Care, Nursing Care Coordination, Bad Homburg – Germany

Table 1: Views on shared care haemodialysis expressed by patient

Quality Domains of Healthcare

Open Questions

IntroductionDialysis patients traditionally had access to educationprogrammes related to the different aspects and areas of theillness and its treatment. The ultimate purpose is to provideappropriate resources, training, and support to ensure the bestpossible quality of care and well-being of chronic patients.Scientific literature of the clinical practice suggests that patients'self-management and knowledge about their treatment mayimpact functionality and well-being associated with a decreasedrisk of hospitalisation and mortality.