prr.hec.gov.pkprr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1982/1/1445s.pdf · table of contents...

207
INFLUENCE OF STORAGE DURATION, HARVESTING STAGE AND CALCIUM TREATMENT ON THE STORAGE PERFORMANCE OF APPLE CULTIVARS BY IBADULLAH JAN Dissertation submitted to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University Peshawar in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN AGRICULTURE (HORTICULTURE) DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE FACULTY OF CROP PRODUCTION SCIENCES KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY PESHAWAR -PAKISTAN JULY, 2011

Upload: others

Post on 27-May-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • INFLUENCE OF STORAGE DURATION, HARVESTING STAGE

    AND CALCIUM TREATMENT ON THE STORAGE

    PERFORMANCE OF APPLE CULTIVARS

    BY

    IBADULLAH JAN

    Dissertation submitted to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University Peshawar in

    partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of

    DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN AGRICULTURE

    (HORTICULTURE)

    DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE

    FACULTY OF CROP PRODUCTION SCIENCES

    KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY

    PESHAWAR -PAKISTAN

    JULY, 2011

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Chapter No. Title Page No.

    ABSTRACT i

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii

    LIST OF TABLES iv

    LIST OF FIGURES v

    LIST OF APPENDICES ix

    CHAPTER No. 1

    GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1

    CHAPTER No. 2

    REVIEW OF LITERATURE 6

    CHAPTER No. 3

    INFLUENCE OF STORAGE DURATION ON OF PHYSICO-

    CHEMICAL CHANGES IN FRUIT OF APPLE CULTIVARS

    1. ABSTRACT 24

    2. INTRODUCTION 25

    3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 28

    4. RESULTS 34

    5. DISCUSSIONS 45

    6. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 52

    CHAPTER No. 4

    STORAGE PERFORMANCE OF APPLE CULTIVARS

    HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF MATURITY

    1. ABSTRACT 54

    2. INTRODUCTION 55

    3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 57

  • 4. RESULTS 60

    5. DISCUSSIONS 77

    6. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 85

    CHAPTER No. 5

    INFLUENCE OF CaCl2 CONCENTRATION AND DIPPING

    DURATION ON PHYSICO CHEMICAL CHANGES IN APPLE

    cv. ‘RED DELICIOUS

    1. ABSTRACT 87

    2. INTRODUCTION 88

    3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 90

    4. RESULTS 91

    5. DISCUSSIONS 116

    6. SUMMARY,CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 123

    CHAPTER No. 6

    INFLUENCE OF CaCl2 TREATMENT ON STORAGE

    PERFORMANCE OF APPLE CULTIVARS

    1. ABSTRACT 125

    2. INTRODUCTION 126

    3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 127

    4. RESULTS 129

    5. DISCUSSIONS 149

    6. SUMMARY,CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 156

    OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 158

    LITERATURE CITED 159

    APPENDICES 177

  • INFLUENCE OF STORAGE DURATION, HARVESTING STAGE AND

    CALCIUM TREATMENT ON THE STORAGE PERFORMANCE OF APPLE

    CULTIVARS

    Ibadullah Jan and Abdur Rab

    Department of Horticulture, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University, Peshawar

    ABSTRACT

    The “Influence of storage duration, harvesting stage and calcium treatment on the

    storage performance of apple cultivars” was conducted at Department of Horticulture,

    Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University Peshawar, Pakistan during the years

    2007-10 to optimize the storage duration and calcium treatments for apple fruit. The

    fruit of apple (Pyrus domestica L.) cultivars: Royal Gala, Mondial Gala, Golden

    Delicious and Red Delicious were harvested at optimum maturity and stored at 5±1°C

    with 60-70% relative humidity. Physico-chemical changes in fruit were determined at

    30 days interval during storage. Significant differences were observed among apple

    cultivars. Cultivar Red Delicious had the highest juice content (58.47%), TSS/Acid

    ratio (23.12), ascorbic acid (13.12 mg/100g), fruit firmness (5.98 kg/cm2), fruit

    density (0.82 g/cm3) as well as the least weight loss (2.22%) but also had the highest

    bitter pit (11.86%) and soft rot (13.53%) incidence. Titratable acidity was the highest

    (0.55%) in cultivar Mondial Gala and starch score was the maximum (5.22) in

    cultivar Golden Delicious.

    Storage resulted in significant increased in weight loss, total soluble solids, total

    sugar, pH, TSS/Acid ratio, bitter pit incidence and soft rot, while juice content, starch

    score, titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, firmness and density of fruit decreased with

    increasing storage duration.

    Physico-chemical characteristics of apple fruit varied significantly with harvesting

    stage and storage duration. The juice content (47.68%), total soluble solids (10.07),

    total sugar (9.31%), pH (3.71), TSS/Acid ratio (18.73), ascorbic acid (10.11 mg/100g)

    and soft rot (9.52%) recorded with early mature fruit, increased to 59.33%, 12.92,

    12.98%, 4.23, 29.29, 12.50% and 15.22% accordingly in late mature fruits, while

    weight loss (3.34%), starch score (4.95), titratable acidity (0.59%), fruit firmness

    (5.88 kg/cm2), density of fruit (0.82 g/cm

    3) and bitter pit incidence (11.69%) recorded

  • at early maturity stage, declined with delaying the harvesting to 1.93%, 3.21, 0.49%,

    4.81 kg/cm2, 4.81 g/cm

    3 and 6.63% respectively at late maturity stage.

    Dipping in calcium solution declined the storage related changes but the influence

    was dependant on concentration as well as dipping duration. The juice content

    (60.63%), starch score (5.05), ascorbic acid (12.67 mg/100g), firmness (5.98 kg/cm2)

    and density of fruit (0.81 mg/100g) recorded in fruits dipped in 0% CaCl2 solution

    (control), increased to 64.34%, 5.68, 13.87 mg/100g, 6.54 kg/cm2 and 0.84 mg/100g

    accordingly in fruits dipped in 9% CaCl2 solution. By contrast, weight loss (1.95%),

    total soluble solids (12.01), total sugar (10.95%), TSS/Acid ratio (28.09), bitter pit

    incidence (15.18%) and soft rot (15.33%) incidence recorded in control, decreased to

    1.31%, 11.88, 10.76%, 23.88, 3.80% and 2.10% in fruits treated with 9% CaCl2

    solution. The starch score (5.30), firmness (6.13 kg/cm2) and density of fruit (0.82

    mg/100g) recorded in fruits dipped for 3 minutes in CaCl2 solution, increased to 5.50,

    6.49 kg/cm2 and 0.84 mg/100g accordingly in fruits dipped for 12 minutes in CaCl2

    solution, whereas weight loss (1.81%), TSS/Acid ratio (27.21), bitter pit incidence

    (11.92%) and soft rot (7.07%) incidence recorded in fruits dipped for 3 minutes in

    CaCl2 solution, reduced to 1.41%, 25.27, 5.60% and 6.28% respectively in fruits

    treated CaCl2 solution for 12 minutes. It can be concluded that cultivar Red Delicious

    had superior quality but more susceptible bitter pit and soft rot with prolong storage.

    Harvesting at mid mature stage and calcium chloride (9%) treatment for 9 minutes

    resulted in enhanced storage performance.

  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    I have no words to express my deepest sense of gratitude to Almighty Allah,

    the Most Merciful, the Beneficent, Who bestowed upon me the courage and will to

    complete this project, and contribute to the noble field of knowledge. Cordial

    gratitude to the Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H) who is forever a torch of guidance and

    knowledge for humanity.

    I wish to express my deepest gratitude and profound regard to my honorable

    supervisor Prof. Dr. Abdur Rab, Department of Horticulture for his constant

    encouragement, helpful suggestions and guidance during my scholastic life. His

    critical insight, consistent advice, constructive criticism, personal interest and

    supervision, generated the vigor for excellence in its pursuits, without which it would

    not have been possible to undertake this research project.

    I feel pleasure to thank members of my supervisory committee, Prof. Dr.

    Amanullah Jan, Department of Agronomy, for their cooperation excellent supervision,

    guidance and valuable suggestions. I am also thankful to Prof. Dr. Noor-Ul-Amin,

    Chairman Department of Horticulture, Prof. Dr. Farhatullah, Director Advance

    Studies and Research (DASAR), Prof. Dr. Zahoor Ahmad Swati, Dean Faculty of

    Crop Production Sciences for their cooperation.

    I am highly indebted to Dr. Muhammad Arif (Asstt. Prof), Department of

    Agronomy for his help in data analysis. I also extend many thanks to Prof. Dr. Nawab

    Ali, Prof. Dr. Sher Muhammad, Dr. Muhammad Zubair, Dr. Abdul Mateen and Dr.

    Abrar Hussain Shah, Dr. Gohar Ayub and Mr. Mehboob Alam, Department of

    Horticulture for their full support during my research work. Thanks are also extended

    to Dr. Muhammad Sajid, Assistant Professor and Syed Tanveer Shah, Lecturer,

    Department of Horticulture for providing sincere help and cooperation. I gratefully

    acknowledge Higher Education Commission, Islamabad for providing full financial

    during my studies.

    Finally, I would feel incomplete without thanking to my parents, wife,

    brothers, sisters and other family members who tolerated me patiently during this

    critical period and their prayers enabled me to complete my Ph.D work successfully.

    IBADULLAH JAN

  • LIST OF TABLES

    Table No. Description Page No.

    Table 3.1 The effect of storage duration on weight loss (%), percent 36

    juice (%), starch, TSS (%) and total sugar (%) of apple cultivars

    Table 3.2 The effect of storage duration on percent titratable acidity, pH, 39

    TSS/Acid ratio and ascorbic acid (mg/100g) of apple cultivars

    Table 3.3 The effect of storage duration on firmness (kg/cm2), density 43

    of fruit (g/cm3), soft rot (%) and bitter pit (%) of apple cultivars

    Table 4.1. Calcium content (mg/kg) of orchard soil at the time of fruit 58

    picking

    Table 4.2. Calcium content (%) of apple leaves at the time of fruit picking 58

    Table 4.3 The effect of harvesting stages and storage on weight lost (%), 63

    percent juice, starch, TSS (%) and total sugar (%) of apple

    cultivars

    Table 4.4 The effect of harvesting stages and storage on percent titratable 69

    acidity, pH, TSS/Acid ratio and ascorbic acid (mg/100g) of apple

    cultivars

    Table 4.5 The effect of harvesting stages and storage on firmness (kg/cm2), 74

    fruit density (g/cm3), soft rot (%) and bitter pit (%) of apple cultivars

    Table 5.1 The influence of storage, dipping duration and CaCl2 conc- 96

    entration on weight lost (%), percent juice, starch, TSS (%)

    and total sugar (%) of apple cultivars

    Table 5.2 The influence of storage, dipping duration and CaCl2 concen- 109

    tration on ascorbic acid (mg/100g), firmness (kg/cm2), fruit

    density (g/cm3), bitter pit (%) and soft rot (%) of apple cultivars

    Table 5.3 Calcium content (mg/kg) of apple fruit cv Red delicious as affected 115

    by CaCl2 concentration and dipping duration

    Table 6.1 The effect of cultivars, storage and CaCl2 application on 133

    weight lost, percent juice, starch, Titratable acidity (%), Total

    sugar (%), TSS (%) and TSS/Acid ratio of apple cultivars

    Table 6.2 The effect of calcium application and storage on ascorbic acid 142

    (mg/100g), firmness (kg/cm2), fruit density (g/cm

    3), soft rot (%)

    and bitter pit (%) of apple cultivars

    Table 6.3 Effect of CaCl2 dipping on calcium content (mg/kg) of apple cultivars 148

    LIST OF FIGURES

  • Figure No. Description Page No.

    Figure 3.1 Interaction effect of storage duration and cultivar on asco- 40

    rbic acid (mg/100g) of apple fruit

    Figure 3.2 Interaction effect of storage duration and cultivar on bitter pit 44

    incidence (%) of apple fruit

    Figure 3.3 Interaction effect of storage duration and cultivar on soft rot (%) 44

    of apple fruit

    Figure 4.1 Variation in percent weight loss among apple cultivars after 64

    150 days storage

    Figure 4.2 Interaction effect of cultivar and harvesting stage on percent 64

    weight loss in apple fruit

    Figure 4.3 Influence of harvesting stages on percent weight loss in apple 65

    fruits after 150 days storage

    Figure 4.4 Interaction effect of cultivar and harvesting stage on percent 65

    weight loss of apple fruits stored for 150 days

    Figure 4.5 Interaction effect of storage and harvesting stage on total soluble 66

    solids of apple

    Figure 4.6 Interaction effect of storage and harvesting stage on total 66

    sugar of apple

    Figure 4.7 Interaction effect of storage and harvesting stage on titratable 70

    acidity (%) of apple

    Figure 4.8 Interaction effect of cultivar and storage on pH of apple fruits 70

    Figure 4.9 Interaction effect of cultivar and storage ascorbic acid 71

    (mg/100g) of apple

    Figure 4.10 Interaction effect of storage and harvesting stage on ascorbic 71

    acid (mg/100g) of apple

    Figure 4.11 Interaction effect of cultivar and harvesting stage on bitter 75

    pit (%) of apple

    Figure 4.12 Influence of harvesting stages on bitter pit (%) of apple fruits 75

    after 150 days storage

    Figure 4.13 Interaction effect of cultivar and harvesting stage on soft 76

    rot (%) of apple

  • Figure 4.14 Influence of harvesting stages on soft rot (%) of apple fruits 76

    stored for 150 days

    Figure 5.1 Influence of CaCl2 concentration on percent weight loss in apple 97

    fruits stored for 150 days

    Figure 5.2 Influence of dipping duration on percent weight loss in apple fruits 97

    stored for 150 days

    Figure 5.3 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentration and dipping 98

    duration on percent weight loss in apple fruit

    Figure 5.4 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentrations and storage on 98

    percent juice of apple fruit

    Figure 5.5 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentration and storage on starch 99

    score of apple

    Figure 5.6 Interaction effect of dipping duration and storage on starch 99

    scores of apple

    Figure 5.7 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentration and dipping duration 100

    on starch scores of apple

    Figure 5.8 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentration and storage duration 100

    on TSS of apple

    Figure 5.9 Interaction effect of dipping duration and storage duration on TSS 101

    of apple

    Figure 5.10 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentration and storage duration 101

    on total sugar (%) of apple

    Figure 5.11 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentration and storage 102

    duration on titratable acidity (%) of apple

    Figure 5.12 Interaction effect of dipping duration and storage duration on 102

    titratable acidity (%) of apple

    Figure 5.13 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentration and storage duration 103

    on TSS/Acid ratio of apple

    Figure 5.14 Interaction effect of dipping duration and storage duration 103

    on TSS/Acid ratio of apple

    Figure 5.15 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentrations, dipping durations 104

    and storage durations on TSS/Acid ratio of apple

    Figure 5.16 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentration and storage duration 110

    on ascorbic acid (mg/100g) of apple

  • Figure 5.17 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentration and storage duration 110

    on fruit flesh firmness (kg/cm2) of apple

    Figure 5.18 Interaction effect of dipping duration and storage duration on 111

    fruit flesh firmness (kg/cm2) of apple

    Figure 5.19 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentration and storage duration on 111

    fruit density (g/cm3) of apple

    Figure 5.20 Influence of CaCl2 concentrations on bitter pit (%) of apple fruits 112

    after 150 days storage

    Figure 5.21 Influence of dipping durations on bitter pit (%) of apple fruits 112

    stored for 150 days

    Figure 5.22 Interaction effect of CaCl2 concentration and dipping duration on 113

    bitter pit (%) of apple

    Figure 5.23 Influence of CaCl2 concentration and dipping duration on bitter 113

    pit (%) of apple fruits stored for 150 days

    Figure 5.24 Effect of CaCl2 concentration on soft rot (%) incidence in apple 114

    fruits stored for 150 days

    Figure 5.25 Influence of dipping duration on soft rot (%) incidence in apple 114

    fruits after 150 days storage

    Figure 6.1 Variation in weight loss (%) in apple fruits stored for 150 days 134

    of different apple cultivars

    Figure 6.2 Effect of CaCl2 concentrations on weight loss (%) in apple fruits 134

    stored for 150 days

    Figure 6.3 Interaction effect of CaCl2 application and storage duration on 135

    starch scores of apple

    Figure 6.4 Interaction effect of CaCl2 application and storage duration on 135

    TSS of apple

    Figure 6.5 Interaction effect of CaCl2 application and storage duration on 136

    total sugar (%) of apple Figure 6.6 Interaction effect of cultivar and storage duration on titratable 136

    acidity (%) of apple

    Figure 6.7 Interaction effect of CaCl2 application and storage duration 137

    on titratable acidity (%) of apple

    Figure 6.8 Interaction effect of CaCl2 application and storage duration 137

    on TSS/Acid ratio of apple

  • Figure 6.9 Interaction effect of cultivar and storage on ascorbic acid 143

    (mg/100g) of apple

    Figure 6.10 Interaction effect of CaCl2 application and storage duration on 143

    ascorbic acid (mg/100g) of apple

    Figure 6.11 Interaction effect of cultivar and storage duration on fruit 144

    flesh firmness (kg/cm2) of apple fruit

    Figure 6.12 Interaction effect of CaCl2 application and storage duration on 144

    fruit flesh firmness (kg/cm2) of apple

    Figure 6.13 Variation in bitter pit (%) incidence in apple fruits after 150 145

    days storage of different cultivars

    Figure 6.14 Interaction effect of cultivar and storage on bitter pit (%) incidence 145

    in apple

    Figure 6.15 Effect of CaCl2 concentrations on bitter pit (%) incidence in 146

    apple fruits after 150 days storage

    Figure 6.16 Interaction effect of cultivar and storage on bitter pit (%) 146

    of apple cultivar stored for 150 days

    Figure 6.17 Influence of 150 days storage on soft rot (%) incidence in 147

    apple cultivars

    Figure 6.18 Effect of CaCl2 concentrations on soft rot (%) incidence in apple 147

    fruits stored for 150 days

  • LIST OF APPENDICES

    Appendix No. Description Page No.

    1. ANOVA for weight loss (%) of apple cultivars during storage 177

    2. ANOVA for juice content (%) of apple cultivars during storage 177

    3. ANOVA for starch (score) of apple cultivars during storage 177

    4. ANOVA for total soluble solids of apple cultivars during storage 177

    5. ANOVA for total sugar (%) of apple cultivars during storage 178

    6. ANOVA for percent acidity of apple cultivars during storage 178

    7. ANOVA for pH (%) of apple cultivars during storage 178

    8. ANOVA for TSS/Acid ratio of apple cultivars during storage 178

    9. ANOVA for ascorbic acid (mg/100g) of apple cultivars during 179 storage

    10. ANOVA for firmness (kg/cm2) of apple cultivars during storage 179

    11. ANOVA for fruit density (g/cm3) of apple cultivars during storage 179

    12. ANOVA for bitter pit (%) of apple cultivars during storage 179

    13. ANOVA for percent soft rot of apple cultivars during storage 180

    14. ANOVA for weight loss (%) of apple cultivars as affected by 180 storage and harvesting stages

    15. ANOVA for juice content (%) of apple cultivars as affected by 180 storage and harvesting stages

    16. ANOVA for starch (score) of apple cultivars as affected by 181 storage and harvesting stages

    17. ANOVA for percent acidity of apple cultivars as affected by 181 storage and harvesting stages

    18. ANOVA for total soluble solids of apple cultivars as affected 181 by storage and harvesting stages

    19. ANOVA for total sugar (%) of apple cultivars as affected by 182 storage and harvesting stages

    20. ANOVA for pH (%) of apple cultivars as affected by storage 182

  • and harvesting stages

    21. ANOVA for TSS/Acid ratio of apple cultivars as affected by 182 storage and harvesting stages

    22. ANOVA for ascorbic acid (mg/100g) of apple cultivars as affected 183 by storage and harvesting stages

    23. ANOVA for firmness (kg/cm2) of apple cultivars as affected by 183 storage and harvesting stages

    24. ANOVA for fruit density (g/cm3) of apple cultivars as affected by 183 storage and harvesting stages

    25. ANOVA for bitter pit (%) of apple cultivars as affected by storage 184 and harvesting stages

    26. ANOVA for percent soft rot of apple cultivars as affected by 184 storage and harvesting stages

    27. ANOVA for weight loss (%) of apple fruit as affected by 184 storage, CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

    28. ANOVA for juice content (%) of apple fruit as affected by 185 storage, CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

    29. ANOVA for starch (score) of apple fruit as affected by storage, 185 CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

    30. ANOVA for percent acidity of apple fruit as affected by 185 storage, CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

    31. ANOVA for total soluble solids of apple fruit as affected by 186 storage, CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

    32. ANOVA for total sugar (%) of apple fruit as affected by storage, 186 CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

    33. ANOVA for TSS/Acid ratio of apple fruit as affected by storage, 186 CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

    34. ANOVA for ascorbic acid (mg/100g) of apple fruit as affected by 187 storage, CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

    35. ANOVA for firmness (kg/cm2) of apple fruit as affected by 187 storage, CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

    36. ANOVA for fruit density (g/cm3) of apple fruit as affected by 187 storage, CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

  • 37. ANOVA for bitter pit (%) of apple fruit as affected by storage, 188 CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

    38. ANOVA for percent soft rot of apple fruit as affected by storage, 188 CaCl2 concentrations and dipping durations

    39. ANOVA for weight loss (%) of apple cultivars as affected by 188 storage and CaCl2

    40. ANOVA for juice content (%) of apple cultivars as affected by 189 storage and CaCl2

    41. ANOVA for starch (score) of apple cultivars as affected by 189 storage and CaCl2

    42. ANOVA for percent acidity of apple cultivars as affected by 189 storage and CaCl2

    43. ANOVA for total soluble solids of apple cultivars as affected by 190 storage and CaCl2

    44. ANOVA for total sugar (%) of apple cultivars as affected by 190 storage and CaCl2

    45. ANOVA for TSS/Acid ratio of apple cultivars as affected by 190 storage and CaCl2

    46. ANOVA for ascorbic acid (mg/100g) of apple cultivars as 191 affected by storage and CaCl2

    47. ANOVA for firmness (kg/cm2) of apple cultivars as affected 191 by storage and CaCl2

    48. ANOVA for fruit density (g/cm3) of apple cultivars as affected 191 by storage and CaCl2

    49. ANOVA for bitter pit (%) of apple cultivars as affected by 192 storage and CaCl2

    50. ANOVA for percent soft rot of apple cultivars as affected by 192 storage and CaCl2

  • CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION

    The apple

    Apple (Pyrus domestica L) is one of the most important tree fruit of the world. The

    apple was cultivated in Greece around 600 BC or earlier. It is a highly nutritive fruit

    which is a rich source of sugars 11%, fat 0.4%, protein 0.3%, carbohydrates 14.9%,

    vitamins and minerals. A 100 g fresh apple contains, water 84.7%, fibre 0.8 g,

    carbohydrates 13.9 g, proteins 0.4 g, lipid 0.3 g, ash 0.3 g, vitamin C 8 mg/100gm,

    sodium 0.3 mg/100g, potassium 145 mg/100g, calcium 7 mg/100g, magnesium 6

    mg/100gm, iron 480 μg/100g, Phosphorus 12 mg and Iodine 2 μg (Hussain, 2001).

    Due to its high nutritional value, it ranks third in consumption after citrus and banana

    (Bokhari, 2002).

    Status of apple in Pakistan

    In Pakistan its cultivation is limited and restricted to the northern hilly tracts of Punjab

    and KP, and the Quetta region of Balochistan. Currently, the apple is grown over an

    area of 11.13 thousand hectares with a total production of 437.39 thousand tons in

    Pakistan (MINFA, 2008-09). In KP, the apple plantation is distributed in Swat, Dir,

    Mansehra, Parachinar, Chitral, Hunza, North and South Waziristan Agencies. District

    Swat, with an area of approximately 4000 square miles with in the Malakand

    Division, is the most important of all the apple producing districts of Khyber

    Pakhtunkhwa followed by the districts of Mansehra, Dir, Abbottabad, Chitral and

    Hunza (Bokhari, 2002; Ali et al., 2004). Increased production of apple by extending

    its cultivation of apple in low altitude areas of Pakistan is limited by its high chilling

    requirements (Janick, 1974).

    Climatic requirements

    Due to its chilling requirements, it grows best in relatively cooler climates than other

    deciduous fruits (Westwood and Chestnut, 1964). Apples can endure quite low

    temperatures, but temperatures of –30oC and rapid fluctuation in winter from

    relatively warm to extremely cold temperatures are harmful (Bokhari, 2002). The

    apple gives better yield in relatively long, cool and slow growing season, the type of

    climate which usually prevails at altitudes of 1700-2500 m.

    Soil requirements

  • Apple trees grow well in a wide range of soil types. They prefer soils with a texture of

    sandy loam to a sandy clay loam. Good soil drainage is also critical for successful

    apple production. Ideal soil pH for apple tree is near 6.5 (Gao, 2001). The growth and

    development of apple tree is adversely affected by water logged soils, rising water

    tables into the root zone even for a short time, soils having hardpan and shallow soils

    (Chaudhary, 1994).

    Common apple cultivars grown in Pakistan

    Various cultivars of apples which are being grown in Pakistan include Top Red, Red

    Spur, Red Delicious, Golden Delicious, Super Gold, Red Chief, Apple Elite, Stark

    Crimson, Oregon Spur, Red Rom Beauty, Royal Gala, Mondial Gala, Spartan And

    Double Red (Chaudhary, 1994).

    The need of apple storage

    Being in high demand throughout the year, the apple is generally stored in cold

    storage. In relatively cold climates, simple warehouses may be effective for short term

    storage (Mitropoulos and Lambrinos, 2000) but cold storage is required for long term

    storage and quality retention. It is estimated that about 17% of apples produced in

    Balochistan are lost during postharvest operations (Shah et al., 2002). In Pakistan,

    apples kept under the conditions of cold storage for 22 weeks, losses were found to be

    28 percent (Ilyas et al., 2007).

    Postharvest losses

    Postharvest and storage losses may vary among different cultivars (Golias et al.,

    2008), due to internal quality characteristics such as titratable acidity, soluble solids,

    fruit flesh firmness, ethylene production and weight loss in cold storage (Golias et al.,

    2008), which may in turn influence the texture and storage performance of apple

    cultivars (Perring, 1989; Hoehn et al., 2003). Cultivars may also differ in fruit

    physiology and anatomy (Saleh et al., 2009), including ethylene production, texture,

    fruit flesh firmness (Knee et al., 1983; Larrigaudiere et al., 1997; Stow et al., 2000;

    Johnston et al., 2001; Nilsson and Gustavsson, 2007) and water loss during storage

    (Khan and Ahmad, 2005).

    The physical properties such as fruit flesh firmness (Wilson and Lindsay, 1969;

    Hudson, 1975; Zaltzman et al., 1987), density and juice (Wolfe et al., 1974; Zaltzman

  • et al., 1987) of apple fruit is a measure of dry matter (Jordan et al., 2000) and may

    vary with maturity and during storage (Mitropoulos and Lambrinos, 2000).

    Significant variations in physical characteristics have been reported for different

    cultivars and correlated with storage performance of apple (Karathanos et al., 1995),

    gas exchange (Ho et al., 2010) and subsequent storage life (Meisami et al., 2009).

    Postharvest losses also depend on production area and market distance and the time of

    transportation. It is reported that the total losses in the apples transported from Quetta,

    Swat and Murree to Faisalabad market during the months of August, September and

    November were found to be 23, 20 and 25 percent respectively (Ilyas et al., 2007).

    The postharvest losses may also depend on storage conditions. Among the external

    conditions, temperature and relative humidity during postharvest handling operations

    are the most important factors influencing the storage performance of apple (LeBlanc

    et al., 1996), which affect the fruit flesh firmness, juice content, weight loss, pH,

    soluble solids content (SSC), and other quality (Tu et al., 2000).

    Extending the storage life of apple

    The apple fruit is in high demand throughout the year and hence a considerable

    quantity is generally stored in cold storages in Pakistan. Apple being a perishable

    commodity is prone to qualitative and quantitative losses after harvest. The losses

    may occur during postharvest operations or storage which could be as high as 17%

    (Shah et al., 2002) or even greater (Ilyas et al., 2007). The postharvest quality and

    losses during storage may depend on cultivar (Watkins, 2003; Saleh et al., 2009),

    cultural practices (Tomala, 1999), nutritional status (Hernandez et al., 2005),

    harvesting stage (Ferguson and Watkins, 1989) and storage condition (LeBlanc et al.,

    1996). Thus, the selection of best adopted cultivars (Ferguson and Watkins, 1989),

    optimum pre and postharvest management (Conway et al., 2002) and optimum

    storage conditions (Lau, 1992) can be used to minimize postharvest losses as well as

    increased the storage life of apple fruit (Mahmud et al., 2008; Gupta and Jawandha,

    2010).

    Low temperature storage

    Apple fruits are kept in cold storage after harvest to preserve their quality. Low

    temperature plays main role in slowing the degradation of apple fruit quality during

    storage, depending on the sensitivity of particular cultivars to chilling injury. Apples,

  • like other climacteric fruits, display abrupt increase in ethylene production during

    ripening that lead to changes in texture, fruit flesh firmness, color etc. Endogenous

    ethylene plays key role in apple softening and rapid fruit softening of several cultivars

    is associated with a rapid rise in ethylene production (Knee et al., 1983; Larrigaudiere

    et al., 1997; Stow et al., 2000; Johnston et al., 2001; Nilsson and Gustavsson, 2007).

    The low storage of apples offers the prospect of preventing or delaying softening and

    improving the texture and quality of the fruit available to consumers (Golias and

    Letal, 1995).

    Harvesting stage and storage life

    In Pakistan, the apples are harvested at edible maturity for both fresh market and

    storage. Fruit harvested at this stage have advanced in maturity and are more prone to

    mechanical injury, have short storage life and greater susceptibility to pathogens and

    physiological disorders (Juan et al., 1999). In addition, careless harvesting

    characterized by immature and over mature fruit, is another serious cause of post

    harvest losses (Ingle et al., 2000). Being a climacteric fruit, the apple can be harvested

    at physiological maturity (Roth et al., 2005), stored to catch good price in the market

    (Sayin et al., 2010). In general, apple fruit harvested at immature stage have poor

    color and flavour and can be more susceptible to physiological disorders such as bitter

    pit and superficial scald (Kader and Mitchell, 1989; Kvikliene, 2008). By contrast,

    fruit harvested over-mature tend to be soft and easily damaged during post harvest

    operations (Ingle et al., 2000). Such fruits are more susceptible to diseases and

    physiological disorders as well as quality deterioration during or after storage (Ingle et

    al., 2000; Hribar et al., 1996).

    Calcium treatment and storage life

    Several physiological disorders and diseases of apple fruit during storage are related

    to the calcium content of fruit (Huder, 1981; Shear, 1975). Calcium deficiency results

    in economic losses in fruit crops, including apples (Dyson and Digby, 1975;

    Wilkinson and Fidler, 1973). It helps in regulation of metabolism in apple fruit, and

    adequate concentration maintain fruit flesh firmness and minimize the incidence of

    physiological disorders like water core, bitter pit, and internal breakdown (Bangerth et

    al., 1972; Faust and Shear, 1968). The increase in calcium is generally delayed the

    ripening and fruit maintain their quality during prolong storage. The application of

  • calcium also reduced the incidence of storage decay (Conway, 1982; Sharples and

    Johnson, 1977). Thus it is imperative that compositional changes in apple fruit of

    different cultivars are evaluated over a range of storage duration to standardize the

    storage duration, harvesting time and calcium concentration for each cultivar.

    General objectives:

    1. Evaluate the quality of different apple cultivars

    2. Evaluate the storage performance of apple cultivars

    3. Examine the changes in internal quality characteristics during storage of apple

    cultivars

    4. Determine the influence of harvesting stages on the quality and storage

    performance of apple cultivars

    5. Evaluate the influence of CaCl2 application on the quality and storage

    performance of apple cultivar Red Delicious

    6. Optimize the CaCl2 concentration and dipping duration to minimize the

    quality losses during storage in apple cultivar Red Delicious

  • CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF LITERATURE

    The apple

    The Apple (Pyrus domestica) is one of principal fruits, grown in temperate region of

    the world. It has beautiful and colourful appearance, crispy flesh, pleasant flavour and

    sweet taste that attract the consumers and fetch good price. In Pakistan apples are

    grown in temperate region of the country such as Murree Hills (Rawalpindi), part of

    Peshawar region, Northern areas, Kashmir and Quetta (Ali et al., 2004). Kashmiri,

    Kashmir Amri, Kandhari, Kulu, Kalat Special, Red Beauty of Bath, Golden Delicious,

    Banki and Sky Spur varieties are grown in temperate regions whereas, Tropical

    Beauty, Einsheimer and Enna produce good quality fruit at lower altitudes

    (Chaudhary, 1994). About 80% of the total apple production of Pakistan is

    contributed by Kalat, Killa Saifullah, Loralai, Mastung, Pishin, Quetta and Ziarat

    districts of Balochistan province.

    The area under this fruit has increased five times during 80 and 90 decades of 20th

    century (MINFAL, 1999). The apple is a rich source of nutrients and contains, water

    84.7%, 0.8 g fibre, 13.9 g carbohydrates, 0.4 g proteins, 0.3 g lipid, 0.3 g ash, vitamin

    C 8 mg/100gm, sodium 0.3 mg/100g, potassium 145 mg/100g, calcium 7 mg/100g,

    magnesium 6 mg/100gm, iron 480 μg/100g, Phosphorus 12 mg and Iodine 2 μg

    (Hussain, 2001). Besides fresh consumption of apple fruit, it is used in many products

    like, jams, jellies, marmalades, muraba, salads, sandwich, filling, snacks, in many

    dishes, puddings, sweet meats, pickles and other preserves include pie filling, slices

    and sauces. In foreign countries fermented apple juice is used for alcoholic purposes.

    Sour varieties of apple are used for the preparation of fermented apple juice as cider

    (Hulme, 1970). Perez et al. (2001) reported that the US per capita consumption of

    apples has risen over the past three decades, with consumption of processed apple

    products exceeding consumption of fresh apples in the last 20 years. While fresh

    apple consumption remained fairly stable, the largest increases in processed per capita

    use during the 1990s were for juice, frozen, and dried products.

    Physical characteristics of agricultural products are the most important parameters to

    determine the proper standards of design of grading, conveying, processing and

    packaging systems (Tabatabaeefar and Rajabipour, 2005). Among these physical

    characteristics, mass, volume and projected area are the most important ones in

    determining sizing systems (Khodabandehloo, 1999). Quality differences in fruits can

  • often be detected by differences in density. When fruits are transported hydraulically,

    the design fluid velocities are related to both density and shape. Postharvest

    evaluation gives possibilities for delivering a high quality product and a basic

    understanding of apple texture is necessary for the development of technology for

    postharvest evaluations (Ioannides et al., 2007). Mechanical properties of the tissue

    determine the susceptibility to mechanical damage that can occur during harvest,

    transport and storage and that eventually leads to a profound reduction in commercial

    value (Oey et al., 2007). Mechanical properties such as failure stress and strain as

    well as modulus of elasticity can also be used to evaluate the behavior of the fruits

    mechanically under the static loading. Firmness or hardness is another important

    attribute of fruits and it is often used for fruit quality assessment (Vursavus et al.,

    2006).

    Chemical properties

    Information regarding chemical properties of fruit is crucial in processing it into

    different foods (Vursavus et al., 2006). The sugars content, sucrose, glucose, fructose,

    and sorbitol, in fruit flesh contribute to the fruit sweetness, and are one of the major

    characteristics of fruit quality and market value. The apple fruit accumulate starch at

    the early stages of maturation that is later on hydrolyzed to sugars (Magein and

    Leurquin, 2000). Golias et al. (2008) stored the apple five cultivars in cold storage

    and studied the chemical attributes for titratable acidity, soluble solids, firmness,

    ethylene production and weight loss for 100 days. The changes in titratable acids,

    ethylene production and loss of firmness significantly differentiated the cultivars,

    although Golden Delicious, Reinders and Resista still could not be completely

    separated. Total soluble solids and loss in weight did not contribute to the

    discriminant resolution. Khorshidi et al. (2010) studied the postharvest quality of Red

    Delicious apple under different temperatures (0, 5 and 12°C) for one month. They

    found that the fruit diameter, fruit weight, volume, firmness, total titratable acids

    (TTA), total soluble solids (TSS), elements of sodium and potassium, marketable

    quality and color surface were significantly affected by different storage temperatures.

    However, the Red Delicious apple fruit stored at temperature 0oC maintained the

    better quality attributes. Rutkowski et al. (2008) used optical reflectance spectrometry

    method for the measurement of chlorophyll and evaluate other quality parameters in

    „Golden Delicious‟ apples. They reported that fruit firmness, chlorophyll content and

  • acidity were decreased during vegetative and postharvest period. Significant

    interaction was observed in chlorophyll content, titratable acidity and fruit firmness.

    Thammawong and Arakawa (2010) harvested mature and immature apple fruits and

    treated them with 1-MCP and ethylene for evaluating their response on sugar

    accumulation. Immature fruits treated with ethylene showed decreased amount of

    starch while total sugar content was not significantly affected. Ethylene and 1-MCP

    did not significantly affect the ripening aspects of immature fruit. They reported

    inverse correlation of sugars accumulation with ripening properties and starch

    hydrolysis in „Tsugaru‟ fruit during storage.

    Physical variations

    The physical characteristics of apple fruits are important for their storage as well as

    processing properties. Significant variations have been reported in physical

    characteristics among apple cultivars (Weibel et al., 2004). Appearance, tastiness and

    texture are the main determinants of product‟s quality accepted by consumers.

    According to Surmacka-Szczesniak (2002) texture is an indicator of structural and

    mechanical properties of food products and determines consumer‟s acceptability.

    Fruit firmness is one of the basic criteria of fruit texture estimation and in some

    countries a specific degree of firmness is included in primary parameters for

    marketing (Hoehn et al., 2003). The fruit firmness depends on fruit density related

    with the quality and storage performance of apple fruit (Amarante et al., 2000).

    However, the softening rate has also been reported to vary from cultivar to cultivar,

    depending on the presence and expression of genes which regulate the activity of

    hydrolytic enzymes (Ingle et al., 2000; Konopacka and Plocharski, 2002; Johnston et

    al., 2001).

    Chang-Hai et al. (2006) evaluate the response of peach fuirt firmness to different

    levels of temperature during storage. They recorded the delayed softening of peach

    fruit and inhibition of changes in cell wall and pectin materials at low temperature of

    5°C. They reported that softening of fruit cell wall was due to increased activities of

    cell wall polysaccharide-related enzymes at higher temperature. Sakiyama and

    Nakamura (1980) subjected cucumber fruits to different levels of temperature under

    dry and wet conditions with maintaining their specific gravity at constant while

    volume was at high. The specific gravity and volume of cucumber fruits which were

    in wet conditions was changed at 20°C and became similar to fruits stored in dry

  • conditions. A non-significant change was observed in volume and specific gravity in

    fruits stored at 10°C in humid conditions, with a little change in fresh weight. By

    removing wet conditions their specific gravity and volume was changed at higher rate.

    Meisami et al. (2009) observed the physical characteristics of apples having different

    diameters. Average mass and volume were 74.87 g and 104.5 cm3 respectively while

    apparent density and density were 0.2401 g/cm3

    and 0.7427 respectively. Porosity of

    apples having different diameters was 57.24, 54.13 and 50.17 percent and their

    Average packaging was 0.45. Kheiralipour et al. (2008) evaluated different physical

    and chemical attributes of two apple cultivars. They reported that two apple cultivars

    were significantly different in different physical characteristics at the one percent

    probability level. Nislihan and Celik (2006) stored the apple cultivars in controlled

    environment with 0oC temperature and 85-90% relative humidity. Then heat

    treatments were given for 4 days at 38oC to these cultivars. High weight loss was

    observed in cultivars with heat treatment which was found effective for firmness

    during storage. The heat treatment increased the ripening by accelerating the process

    of respiration and starch degradation. Crouch (2003) treated apple cultivars with

    Smart Fresh and reported significant changes in fruit firmness and incidence of bitter

    pit. Apple cultivar Royal Gala showed highest firmness (5.7 kg/cm2) which was

    followed by cultivar Red Delicious (5.6 kg/cm2) while lowest firmness (4.9 kg/cm

    2)

    was recorded in Golden Delicious. Minimum bitter pit incidence was reported in

    cultivar Red Delicious.

    The physical properties of the fruit determine the diffusivity of water gases through

    the fruits. Thus, influences the availability of oxygen for respiration and water loss.

    Ho et al. (2010) used permeation diffusion reaction model to study the gas exchange

    of apple fruits. They measured the gas respiration parameters and exchange properties

    of the fruit organ tissues. The measurements revealed the existence of metabolic gases

    in apple fruit. Large potential for controlled atmosphere (CA) storage was recorded in

    Jonagold while Braeburn showed low diffusion properties. Kanzi had less O2 anoxia

    at CA storage compared with Braeburn. Karathanos (1995) used different

    concentrations of sucrose for determining the air drying kinetics of fresh and

    dehydrated apples fruits. The samples that were pre-treated with concentrated

    solutions of sugar of 45% significantly decreased the diffusivity. The low diffusivity

    helps in storage stability and for better utilization of fruits.

  • Postharvest problems

    The apple fruits are characterized by relatively low rates of respiration 5-10 mg CO2

    kg-1

    h-1

    ) and high rates of ethylene production (10-100 µl kg-1

    h-1

    ) as well as sensitivity

    to ethylene (Kader, 2002). Therefore, the apple fruits are prone to significant

    postharvest losses during postharvest handling and storage. According to (LeBlanc et

    al., 1996), the fruit production chain, including harvest, storage and distribution are

    generally not perfect with 90% of fresh apples stored under improper conditions,

    especially during the summer period. It is found that some cultivars are more

    susceptible to decay than the others. Thus the incidence of different pathogens on

    apple fruit such as blue mold, gray mold, bull‟s-eye rot, and mucor rot is dependent

    on cultivar (Spotts et al., 1999). Hence apple cultivars are generally selected for

    resistance to certain postharvest diseases. For example, „Royal Gala‟ is extremely

    resistant to wound pathogens, „Granny Smith‟ to skin punctures, and „Braeburn‟ to

    infiltration of fungal spores into the core (Spotts et al., 1999). The onset of ripening

    and senescence in various fruit and vegetables renders them more susceptible to

    infection by pathogens (Kader, 1985). Extended storage of apple fruit may cause

    enzymatic browning accompanied by unpleasant colors and flavors and a loss of

    nutrients. The browning of apple fruit during storage depends on polyphenol content

    and polyphenoloxidase (PPO) activity (Goupy et al., 1995), an enzyme that catalyses

    the oxidation of polyphenols to their corresponding quinones (Rocha and Morais,

    2001).

    Shah et al. (2002) analyzed quality and marketing of apple produced in Balochistan.

    There are two cold stores in Balochistan which have the capacity of 700 tones.

    Because of tight packaging and wooden crates 17 percent of apples were found

    damaged in cold storage, while 12 percent were unconsumed. in Quetta market during

    the month March 70% of apples were shin kulu while the rest were Gala, Tore kulu,,

    Mashadi and Kashmiri. The apple variety Shin kulu resulted longer shelf life as

    compared to other varieties because of firmness in texture. Ilyas et al. (2007)

    estimated the losses of apples during transportation in different months. When apples

    were kept in cold storages then losses decreased to 28 percent because certain types of

    fungus related infections were controlled. The pathogenic fungi in both inoculated and

    non inoculated apple fruits were Rhizopus nigricans, Aspergillus niger and Alternaria

    tenuis, while the rottening of banana fruits were due to a number of fungi and

    fumigates was also pathogenic to both injured and non injured banana fruits. Tu et al.

  • (2000) examined apple cultivars at different RH conditions keeping in view the

    quality of apples. Depending on the cultivar some apples at RH 95% and 20°C

    develop mealy texture. The 65% RH is typical and 30% is a low RH for increasing

    shelf life. The firmness of apples for both apple cultivars became decreased with a

    slower rate at higher RH, while weight loss became higher at low RH. Higher levels

    of RH was helpful in maintaining firmness of apples and in decreasing weight losses

    but it promote mealy texture at 20°C. Scheper et al. (2007) evaluated the effect of

    washing and unwashing treatments on post harvest apples in controlling storage rots

    in injured and uninjured fruits. Washing of apples in high fungal populations

    significantly affected the punctured fruits as compared the uninjured fruits while no

    significant difference was observed in punctured and uninjured fruits when washed

    with water containing less population of fungi. Penicillium spp. was the main causal

    agent of rots while non significant effect was observed in yeast rot incidence. Pesis et

    al. (2009) treated apple fruits with ethylene and then stored at cold storages to observe

    the ripening process and superficial scald development of climacteric fruits. The bitter

    pit and development of superficial scald was greatly suppressed by cold storage at

    0oC. the transformed lines of 103Y, 130Y and 68G a little amount of ethylene in cold

    storage at 0oC during the first 3 months and then little increase at 20

    oC, while the

    untransformed fruits significantly increased the ethylene production at cold storage

    which was dramatically increased at 20oC and respiration was not significantly

    affected. The line 68G produced greater amount of both (E, E) alpha-farnesene and

    (Z, E) alpha-farnesene as compared to yellow and green fruits in all lines after 2

    months at 0oC. (E, E) alpha-farnesene produced 100 times more than (Z, E) alpha-

    farnesene in all lines. The severity of superficial scald were more in untransformed

    GS apples whereas lines 103Y and 68G show less severity while line 103Y was free

    from any scald. Green fruits were severely affected from superficial scald as

    compared to yellow fruits. The production of 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (MHO) was

    also higher in these lines which is a major oxidation product of (E, E) alpha-

    farnesene. Superficial scald and MHO were absent in line 130Y. they reported that

    transgenic apples produce alpha-farnesene which then oxidizes to MHO and free

    radicals and develop superficial scald.

  • Apple cultivars and storage performance

    A large number of apple cultivars have been developed and considerable differences

    have been reported in their storage performance. Saleh et al., (2009) stored four apple

    cultivars in two seasons at 0ºC temperature and 85-90% relative humidity in different

    durations. Highest weight loss was recorded in Gala while least weight loss was

    observed in Star Cremson. Golden delicious showed highest fruit firmness while

    lowest firmness was observed in Star Cremson and Starking Delicious. All apple

    cultivars were significantly affected in all parameters during cold storage. Apple

    cultivar Star Cremson showed highest fruit storability. Ali et al. (2011) examined

    chemical changes in apple pulp during storage. They reported that ascorbic acid

    content, pH and sugar acid ratio was decreased while TSS and titratable acidity was

    increased in 90 days of storage. Treatments and storage intervals significantly affected

    the physico-chemical properties of apples. Omaima et al. (2007) treated pre-harvest

    apple cultivar Anna with boric acid and calcium chloride as a foliar spray to decrease

    the incidence of Bortytis cinerea, a main causal agent of fruit rot. The combined

    treatments of foliar spray significantly increased total soluble solids, fruit firmness,

    total anthocyanine and total sugar, while decreased fruit rot decay percentage, weight

    losses percentages and total acidity at 5°C and cold storage for 60 days.

    Kvikliene et al. (2006) evaluated the pre and post harvest chemical changes in apple

    cultivar „Auskis‟. Least weight loss was observed in apple cultivar harvested at

    optimum maturity. Fruit firmness was decreased with late harvesting. Positive

    correlation was observed between firmness at harvest and post-storage acidity and

    negative correlation was observed in firmness at harvest and post-storage sugar/acid

    ratio. Post-storage sugar/acid ratio and post-storage soluble solid content were

    correlated to soluble solids content at harvest. They reported that optimal harvest time

    is in between of 114 and 121 days for apple cultivar „Auskis‟ after full bloom.

    Markuszewski and Kopytowski (2008) grafted different apple cultivars on each other

    and applied soil cultivation in six manners in rows. After the harvest and storage

    period, fruits were contained less ascorbic acid, dry matter and organic acids and

    more simple sugars and total sugars. The cultivar „Szampion‟ grafted on MM.106

    showed best results for all parameters. The manner of soil cultivation significantly

    affected the apple cultivars for most of the parameters while the best results were

    obtain with manure and polypropylene fabric. Eugenia et al. (2006) compared the four

    apple cultivars in both traditional and refrigerating storages. Refrigerating storage

  • showed best results as compared to traditional storage. Refrigerated storage resulted

    lowest dehydration in Wagener Premiat varieties while highest water loss was

    recorded in Jonathan. Wagener Premiat varieties also resulted better qualities

    regarding ascorbic and acid total sugar as compared to other varieties. They reported

    that apples should be stored in controlled atmosphere (CA) storage to keep the apples

    in optimum conditions.

    Ali et al. (2004) stored five apple varieties in ordinary storage at room temperature of

    25oC. An increase was observed in reducing sugar while a decrease was observed in

    non-reducing sugar and total sugars were increased with the prolonged storage

    condition. Acidity was non significantly affected while total soluble solids

    significantly increased during storage at room temperature. A decrease was observed

    in Vitamin C during storage. They recommended Golden Delicious and Amri

    cultivars of apple for storage to fetch good market price. Khan and Ahmad (2005)

    stored five apple cultivars under ordinary storage conditions at room temperature in

    September. The first two weeks of storage did not significantly affected the apple

    cultivars while gradual change in weight loss and fruit frimness was observed with

    four weeks of storage. Apple cultivar Amri showed highest weight loss during six

    weeks of storage while the cultivar Kalakulu resulted least weight loss. Dobrzanski et

    al. (2001) established sorting line for sorting and sizing of apples. From outlets of

    sorter apples of different sizes were analyzed for their weight, size and colour for

    assigning a fruit quality index. For achieving final fruit quality index some nutritional

    values of apple like L-ascorbic acid and reducing sugar were also determined. Eisele

    and Drake (2005) compared 175 apple varieties collected from several geographical

    areas of USA in terms of their pH, Brix, glucose, fructose, sorbitol, citric, calcium and

    sodium levels with existing compositional database values. The juices obtained from

    apple varieties were highly variable in terms of their phenolic compounds. Some of

    the characteristics were highly matched with one another such as the phloridzin and

    chlorogenic acid were in same levels in all varieties of apples while arbutin was in not

    measurable levels. They reported that the data developed from different apple

    cultivars is useful with other databases for the development of apple commercial

    varieties in future to meet the consumer requirements.

  • Harvesting time

    To ensure maximum storability, apples should be picked when mature, but not fully

    ripe. If apples are picked when they are too ripe, physiological processes are

    underway which complicate storage, even under optimal conditions (Ingle et al.,

    2000). Apples picked at right stage have the organoleptic qualities which enable them

    to survive more than six months of storage. Apples which were harvested the earliest

    were firmest both before and after storage, but lost a greater percentage of their

    firmness during storage. Apples harvested 100 days after full bloom (DAFB) had a

    firmness of 10.2 kg at harvest and 5.0 kg after storage, and lost 51% of their initial

    firmness. Apples harvested 128 DAFB had a firmness of 8.2 kg at harvest and 4.7 kg

    after storage, and lost 43% of their initial firmness. Apples harvested 114 and 21

    DAFB lost only 41% of their initial firmness. This agrees well with an earlier study

    on fruit softening in other cultivars (Meresz et al., 1993). Fruits that are picked before

    physiological maturity will not ripen satisfactorily (Robertson et al., 1990), while

    those harvested at more mature stage have shorter shelf life (Meredith et al., 1989)

    and did not ship well because of reduced shelf life (Murray et al., 1998). Peaches, if

    harvested too early are small, very firm in texture, with low sugars, reduced flavour

    and colour while the later picked fruits are very soft, high in sugar and water content

    and all the physiological processes which complicate storage are underway. Once the

    fruit ripens, senescence begins; physical and chemical changes continue after

    optimum ripeness is reached including further softening, loss of desirable flavor and

    complete breakdown (Kader and Mitchell, 1989). Gupta and Jawandha (2010) studied

    the response of peach cultivar „Earli Grande‟ to three stages of fruit harvest and

    evaluated their physical and chemical characteristics to cold storage of 0-20oC

    temperature 85-90% relative humidity for 21 days. The fruit quality parameters were

    significantly affected by different stages of fruit harvest. An increase in physiological

    loss in weight, acid ratio, spoilage, TSS and anthocyanins was observed with the

    delay in harvesting stage and increase in storage time. With the advancement in

    maturity and storage duration a linear decline in Vitamin A content was observed. A

    gradual decrease of reducing sugars was observed in fruits with the increase in storage

    period picked after optimum maturity. They reported that peach fruits harvested at

    optimum maturity retained maximum TSS acid ratio and could be stored for three

    weeks in cold storage.

  • Lafer (2006) investigated the response of apples to different harvesting dates while

    applying treatments of AVG before harvest and 1-MCP after harvest. Storage in

    controlled atmosphere treated with 1-MCP and AVG showed good titratable acidity

    and firmness while delayed the fruit softening. Over matured fruits lost more acidity

    and firmness as compared to those fruits which were harvested at optimal maturity

    stage. AVG and 1-MCP treatments also affected the amount of Total soluble solids.

    Storage for more time showed CO2 damages, senescent scald and fungal decay.

    Maximum incidence of internal browning was observed in over ripeed apples treated

    with 1- MCP. McLellan et al. (1990) harvested apple fruits at three different stages.

    The harvested fruits were at cold storages with a 95% RH. The slices of apples were

    taken from different treatments for analyzing their Brix/acid ratio. Raw slices of

    apples were analyzed though Sensory analysis. Slice firmness was due to CA delay

    and harvesting date. With the delay of storing at CA storage the un-blanched raw

    slices, showed softening, while late harvest also resulted higher softening. Blanching

    of slices greatly increased the softening. A significant increase in apple flesh

    browning was recorded at delay in storage at CA and due to later harvest. There was

    no significant difference in acceptability rating of raw slices of apples before freezing.

    Echeverria et al. (2002) evaluated the response of fruit quality and production of

    aroma of apples to influence of storage conditions and harvest date. Fruit firmness,

    soluble solids, titratable acidity, physiological disorders, skin color and aroma

    production was measured after 3, 5 and 7 months of storage. Controlled atmosphere

    maintained good quality of fruits as compared AIR atmospheres. Apples treated with

    ULO1 maintained good firmness in storage conditions as compared to other

    treatments. AIR atmosphere maintained the more aroma of apple. By passing of more

    time, decrease in aroma was recorded. Storage of apples in ultra-less O2 atmospheres

    showed less aroma production treated with ULO2. Erkan and Pekmezcu (2004)

    studied the effect of harvest dates (15 days interval) on superficial scald development

    and postharvest quality in „Granny Smith‟ apples (Malus domestica) stored at 0oC

    with 90% relative humidity for 8 months. A significant variation was observed for

    weight loss, soluble solids, titratable acidity and flesh firmness among the different

    harvest dates. Increased soluble solids were achieved with Delay harvest. Flesh

    firmness, titratable acidity and soluble solids remained at acceptable levels regardless

    of harvest dates and storage durations. Early harvested fruits were decayed at a lower

    rate. The „Granny Smith‟ apples could be stored for 8 months with minimal scald

  • incidences (0% to 14.2% depending on storage length). Hernandez et al. (2005)

    harvested apple (Malus domestica) of the fruit at two or three different maturity stages

    stored at 33 ºF in air or in controlled atmosphere (CA). Fruit stored in CA conserved

    higher firmness and produced less CO2. Internal browning was not seen in fruit stored

    in air, but appeared in fruit after two months storage in CA. The incidence did not

    increase after longer storage times. It did not affect the incidence of internal

    browning, but DPA inhibited internal browning completely. A mineral analysis of the

    apple flesh showed differences among the seasons. Concentrations of calcium (Ca),

    boron (B) and magnesium (Mg) were significantly higher, corresponding with a lower

    incidence of internal browning.

    Tomala (1999) investigated the effect of several renowned factors on the quality of

    pome fruits at harvest and following storage. Sensitivity to low calcium and

    susceptibility to physiological disorders during storage was observed by the apple

    fruits. Calcium content of apple at maturity was influenced by environmental and

    cultural factors. Important factors (fertilization, pollination, seed number and fruit set)

    played a crucial role in fruit quality after breakage of dormancy and appearance of

    bloom. Fruits, which develop from terminal flowers, are richer in calcium than those

    developing from lateral ones. The location of fruits in the tree crown is also

    influencing calcium concentration, and incidence of physiological disorders; more

    fruits are affected in the upper parts of canopy. Calcium treatments reduced the

    occurrence of physiological disorders. Apples low in calcium showed an earlier onset

    of the endogenous ethylene climacteric as fruits mature on the tree as compared to

    early blooming ones. Fruits from late blooming flowers produced less ethylene,

    exhibited a lower starch index and developed superficial scald during storage.

    Steenkamp et al. (1983) recorded that bitter pit tissue had a higher concentration of

    calcium, potassium and magnesium than sound tissue as well as higher concentrations

    of oxalic and citric acid but a lower concentration of malic and succinic acid. It

    appeared that localized excessive concentrations of oxalic and citric acid could induce

    bitter pit. Cocucci (1983) reported the mechanism energy dependent able to secrete

    proton, linked to cation influx in plasmalemma of apple fruit (cv. Granny Smith). This

    helps in uptake of organic and inorganic compounds by apple cells during ripening.

    The pitted fruits had 60% lowered proton secretion as compared to fine ones but

    similar transmembrane electric potential at low k+ level. The pitted fruits had lower

    Ca2+

    content as compared to the fine ones. Calmodulin level was 40% higher in the

  • pitted apple fruits than in the sound ones. This result indicated an involvement of the

    calmodulin- Ca2+

    system in the bitter pit. Juan et al. (1999) investigated the effect of

    harvest date on storage ability of 'Golden Delicious' apple and cold stored for seven

    months. Quality indices (soluble solids content, flesh firmness, acidity and starch

    index) were determined weekly for one month before the first harvest date and upon

    removal from storage. Fruit susceptibility with increasing maturity was inoculated

    with Penecillium expansum, keeping in cold storages for five weeks. After removal

    from cold storage, superficial scald and moisture loss incidence were higher on fruit

    picked earlier. Bitter pit occurrence was also observed. The percentage of marketable

    size fruit and disease severity increased with harvest date. Starch index was

    significantly correlated to acidity, soluble solids and firmness, suggesting that it could

    be used to predict fruit quality after cold storage. Kvikliene et al. (2008) studied the

    effect of fruit maturity on apple fruit cv. „Ligol‟ storage ability and rot development.

    Fruits for storage were harvested 5 times at weekly intervals before, during and after

    predictable optimum harvest date. The fruits quality parameters changed according to

    harvest date. Later harvested fruits were softer. Content of soluble solids did not

    depend on harvest time. Fruit storage ability was closely connected to fruit maturity.

    The best quality apple fruits one week before climacteric peak were picked after 180

    days of storage.

    Calcium and postharvest performance

    According to Conwey et al. (1982) fruits and vegetables require additional cost in

    value addition, when they are moved from the field to the consumer. Thus, it is an

    economic necessity to decrease by extending the storage life. While several treatments

    e.g. heat, chemicals, and irradiation can be used to reduce incidence of

    microorganisms, but injury to fruit and consumer‟s concerns about chemical residues

    or ionizing radiation requires the development of alternative methods of protection.

    Calcium is an important second category macro-nutrient which is involved in variety

    of different function. Calcium helps to regulate the metabolism in apple fruit, and

    adequate concentration maintain fruit firmness, delays fruit ripening, lower the

    incidence of physiological disorders such as water core, bitter pit, and internal

    breakdown (Bangerth et al., 1972; Faust and Shear., 1968; Mason, et al., 1975; Reid

    and Padfield., 1975) and suppress Erwinia carotovora (Jones) incidence on apple

    fruits (Conway, 1982; Sharples and Johnson., 1977).

  • Mahmud et al. (2008) treated Papaya (Carica Papaya L.) fruits with 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5%

    solutions of calcium chloride by dipping and vacuum infiltration (33 Kpa) or

    untreated (0%) as control to study the storage life and postharvest quality

    characteristics. The postharvest infiltration of calcium at 2.5% has the potential to

    control disease incidence, prolong the storage life and preserve valuable attributes of

    postharvest papaya, presumably because of its effects on inhibition of ripening and

    senescence process and loss of the fruit firmness of papaya. Kadir (2005) sprayed

    „Jonathan' apple trees at three commercial orchards with calcium chloride (CaCl2)

    solution containing 3.2 g/L, starting when apple sizes were between 0.9 and 1.6 cm

    average diameters. Apples were stored for two and four months in regular atmosphere

    storage at 2°C (36°F). Apples stored for two months had better quality than those

    stored for four months. Depending on the location, five to eight CaCl2 applications

    and two to seven applications were necessary to retain an average of 26% of fruit

    firmness and an average of 35% of the SSC/TA, respectively, in the two-month

    storage. At least seven applications were required to retain an average of 29% of fruit

    firmness of apples stored for four months. Six to seven applications of CaCl2 retained

    fruit weight by 22 to 33% more than the non-treated control apple. In general, CaCl2

    was beneficial for storage quality of 'Jonathan' apples in Kansas. Trentham (2008)

    stored the apple fruits at 0oC after dipping for 2 minutes in 0, 2%, 4%, or 6% solution

    of CaCl2 at 0 or 68.95 kPa. He recorded the data for different parameters with the

    interval of four months. Paraffin sections were stained with an aqueous mixture of

    alcian blue 8GX, Safaranin 0 and Bismark brown Y, or with theperiodic acid-Schiff

    (PAS) reaction. No histological difference was observed in fruit treated with 2%

    CaCl2 compared with those pressure-infiltrated with greater amounts of Ca. Fruits

    pressure-infiltrated with 6% CaCl2 exhibited the greatest amount of flattened

    epidermal cells and hypodermal cavities. Cuticles were also affected at the higher

    CaCl2 treatment levels (with regard to staining with Bismark brown), becoming more

    condensed and uniform. Cuticle and hypodermis were stained differentially with PAS

    in the 6% CaCl2 treatment. All tissues, including the cuticle, were stained magenta

    red, indicating a possible chemical alteration of the cuticle and the underlying tissue

    by calcium. Petersen (1980) reviewed the available information regarding calcium

    (Ca) nutrition of apple trees. In spite of a high Ca content in most orchard soils and a

    high potential of Ca uptake in apple trees, there is no doubt about Ca deficiency being

    a causal factor for many disorders in apple fruits. Translocation acts by ion exchange,

  • mainly in the xylem, and is very slow. Apical meristems and young growing fruits

    with rapid cell division have a high demand for Ca and depend on a continuous

    supply. Concurrent with a change in fruit growth from cell division to cell expansion,

    the Ca intake in the fruits may cease and fruit Ca content may even decrease, as the

    fruits may then serve to some extent as a source of Ca for growing leaves and shoot

    tips. Fruits containing Ca at less than 50 mg kg−1

    of fresh weight are sensitive to bitter

    pit and internal breakdown. As dipping the ripe fruit in a Ca solution after harvest

    often gives the same protection as a Ca spray on the trees, permanent damage in the

    developing or ripening fruits can be avoided. That means that some of the disorders of

    the fruits are caused by lack of Ca in the respiratorial and senescence processes rather

    than in the developmental stage. Conway et al. (2002) suggested that calcium, the

    most important mineral element determining fruit quality. It seemed to be especially

    important in apples where it reduced metabolic disorders. Calcium in adequate

    amounts helped to maintain apple fruit firmness and decreases the incidence of

    physiological disorders (water core, bitter pit and internal breakdown). Postharvest

    decay may also be reduced by increasing the calcium content of apple fruit. Directly

    applied calcium increased fruit calcium content. Both pre- and postharvest calcium

    treatment methods had inherent problems. Developing a commercially acceptable

    method of successfully increasing calcium concentration in fruit is a continuing

    challenge.

    Freitas et al. (2010) examined that bitter pit, a Ca2+

    deficiency disorder of apple fruit

    (Malus domestica), is a complex process that involves not only the total input of Ca2+

    into the fruit, but also a proper Ca2+

    homeostasis at the cellular level. The objective of

    this study was to test the hypothesis that Ca2+

    accumulation into storage organelles

    and binding to the cell wall is associated with BP development in apple fruit. The

    experiment was carried out on „Granny Smith‟ apples stored at 0oC for 60 days. After

    storage, fruit were segregated into two lots for analysis, apples with the water-soaked

    initial visual symptoms of BP and those not showing this symptom. Cytochemical and

    ultra structural observations showed an accumulation of Ca2+

    in the vacuole of

    individual outer cortical cells of pitted fruit. We also observed an increase in the

    expression of genes encoding four pectin methyle-sterases, a greater degree of pectin

    de-esterification and therefore more Ca2+

    binding sites in the cell wall, and a higher

    fraction of the total cortical tissue Ca2+

    content that was bound to the cell wall in

    pitted fruit compared with non-pitted fruit. Cells of the outer cortical tissue of pitted

  • fruit consistently had higher membrane permeability than outer cortical cells of non-

    pitted fruit. The results provide evidence that Ca2+

    accumulation into storage

    organelles and Ca2+

    binding to the cell wall represent important contributors to BP

    development in apple fruit. Hayat et al. (2003) investigated the effect of different

    concentrations of calcium chloride (1%, 1.5%, 2%), paraffin wax coating and

    different wrapping materials (polyethylene, carton paper) to increase the shelf life and

    to avoid the postharvest losses of Banky cultivars of apple. All the treatments had a

    significant effect on the shelf life of fruits. Calcium chloride (2%) proved very useful

    for reducing weight loss and shrivelling and retained consumer acceptability even

    after 60 days of storage. Polyethylene packaging stood second position after 2%

    calcium chloride treatment. Swiątkiewicz and Błaszczyk (2007) studied the effect of

    late spraying with 0.8% Ca(NO3)2 on calcium content as well as nutrient mutual

    relations between mineral constituents in „Elise‟ fruit of 5 year old apple tree. In

    general, foliar spray with calcium nitrate increased Ca concentration in fruits

    determined both after treatments and after harvest however this effect was modified

    by weather conditions in particular experimental years. Sprays with calcium nitrate

    significantly decreased N/Ca and K/Ca ratio in fruits analyzed after treatments as well

    as freshly harvested fruits, however only in 2005. Castro et al. (2008) studied the

    biochemical factors associated with a CO2 induced internal flesh browning (FB)

    disorder of Pink Lady apples (Malus domestica‟). Pink Lady apples were stored in air

    or controlled atmosphere (CA) with 1.5 kPa O2 and 5 kPa CO2 at 0.5oC for 2 and 4

    months. Both brown and surrounding healthy tissues in apples with FB showed a

    decrease in ascorbic acid and an increase in dehydroascorbic acid during the first 2

    months of storage in CA, the time period when FB developed. Undamaged, CA-

    stored apples retained a higher concentration of ascorbic acid after 2 months in

    storage. The level of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) increased more in the flesh of CA

    stored apples than in air stored apples, an indication of tissue stress. In addition,

    concentrations of H2O2 were significantly lower in diphenylamine (DPA) treated

    apples. Treatment with DPA also inhibited FB completely compared to untreated

    apples. Poly phenol oxidase (PPO) activity was similar for apples kept in air or CA

    storage and between undamaged and damaged fruit. The results showed a closer

    association between FB and the oxidant antioxidant mechanisms such as ascorbic

    acid, H2O2 and DPA, than to the activity of specific browning enzymes like PPO.

    Further investigation of the protective effect of ascorbic acid is warranted as is further

  • research on the underlying causes of apple fruit susceptibility to FB. Biggs et al.,

    (1993) treated apple cultivar Nittany by Alternaria spp with the calcium chloride

    (CaCl2) for its efficacy in reducing the incidence and severity of infection. CaCl2

    reduced the incidence of rot from 61% in the controls to 27 and 33%, respectively.

    Dip treatments alone reduced rot incidence to 17 and 12% for the CaCl2 and liquid

    CaCl2 treatments, and seasonal sprays followed by dip treatment reduced incidence to

    5%. In postharvest tests, fruit treated with CaCl2 alone and in combination with

    iprodione exhibited the lowest incidence and severity of Alternaria rot. At harvest,

    isolation frequency from surface-disinfested fruit averaged 34%. Martin et al. (1960)

    sprayed different treatments to half-trees of Cleopatra apples, it was shown that

    magnesium nitrate increased the incidence of pit and calcium nitrate decreased it but

    increased the calcium content, borax decreased the effectiveness of the calcium nitrate

    treatment. Magnesium or calcium nitrate, with or without borax, did not affect the

    potassium, magnesium, phosphorus, or nitrogen content of the fruit cortex.

    Petersen (1980) conducted an experiment with apple trees, cultivar „Cox's Orange‟,

    Ca was omitted in the nutrient solution for periods of different length. In the bulked

    sample, average size of fruits was not considerably affected, but the distribution of

    small and large fruits changed toward smaller fruits. Concurrently, bitter pit was

    reduced compared to the control. Average fruit size was not significantly changed, but

    the distribution was towards larger fruits. Under these circumstances bitter pit was

    increased. Ca deficiency, caused either by omission of Ca or competition between K

    and Ca, increased fruit rot, russeting and cracks on the fruits. Short term variations in

    Ca levels were not seen to produce any measurable response. Perring (1989)

    examined the development of physiological disorders in particular zones of apples

    that might be allied to changes in the chemical composition in these and other zones.

    The flavour and texture of the various zones of the fruit may alter differently during

    storage because of changes in the distribution of dry matter, water and organic acids.

    Bitter pit and calcium

    Bitter pit is a physiological disorder that appears as depressed brown lesions in the

    skin of the fruit, located mainly on the calyx end (Ferguson and Watkins, 1989). The

    disorder is inversely related to the Ca concentration of the fruit and, in general, is

    directly related to Mg, potassium (K), phosphorous (P), and nitrogen (N) levels in

    fruit tissues (Fallahi et al., 1997). Summer and root pruning, application of growth

  • regulators, fruit thinning, Ca fertilization, effect of localized Ca application have

    shown that the incidence of bitter pit relates to the Ca distribution within the plant

    than to the total Ca supply from the soil. Because Ca moves mainly through the

    transpiration stream as the vegetative tissues have less resistance to transpiration, Ca

    absorbed from the soil will tend to move toward vegetative tissues and away from the

    fruit (Jones and Higgs, 1982).

    Reid and Padfield (1975) evaluated the incidence of bitter of apple cultivar „Cox‟s

    Orange Pippin‟ after dipping in solution containing 2.5% CaCl2 or Ca(NO3)2. The

    incidence of bitter pit was reduced considerably when fruit was dipped in solution

    containing lecithin of egg. Lecithin addition also alleviated the damage often

    associated with calcium dips and improved control of two other physiological

    disorders, breakdown and water core. A dip containing lecithin alone was relatively

    effective. It was suggested that lecithin might assist the movement of applied calcium

    into apple fruits. Dris and Niskanen (1999) treated five commercial apple (Melba,

    Raike, Red Atlas, Akero, Aroma, and Lobo) with preharvest calcium chloride (CaCl2)

    sprayed at Ca 2.0 g/l, stored at 2-6 months at 2-4oC and 85-95% RH. Preharvest CaCl2

    sprays increased fruit firmness and the titratable acidity but decreased soluble solids,

    soluble solids/titratable acidity ratio, and the incidence of physiological storage

    disorders of some cultivars.

    Physical characters and apple

    Jordan et al. (2000) determined the density of unripe kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv.

    Hayward) early in storage as a means to find out the current fruit dry matter (DM) and

    total sugar-plus-starch concentrations, and of predicting DM and soluble solid

    concentrations later when the fruit fully matured. As fruit taste is related to sugar

    concentration, and sugars make up the bulk of the soluble solids in fruit. Density to

    both DM and ripe fruit soluble solids in the composition trial had similar parameter

    values to those of the survey trial and gave S.E. of prediction of about 0.3% FW. DM

    levels were about 3.2% FW above the sum of soluble solids and starch concentrations

    in both ripe and unripe fruit, a difference largely independent of DM concentration.

    Starch lost during ripening was accounted for by the increase in the glucose and

    fructose sugar pools, and these two sugars had near equal concentrations at each DM

    level. Sucrose and minor sugar levels were independent of DM and ripeness.

    McGlone et al. (2007) measured non-destructive density and Visible-Near Infrared

  • (VNIR) on yellow-fleshed kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) harvested on four occasions

    across a commercial harvest period. Density measurements were made by flotation

    and the VNIR measurements using a polychromatic spectrometer system operating

    over the range 300–1140 nm, although much smaller spectral regions were better for

    predicting DM and SSC (both 800–1000 nm), or Hue (500–750 nm). Harvest-time

    and post-storage data sets were formed and used to develop models for predicting

    harvest-time and/or post-storage quality parameters. The VNIR method proved

    superior to the density method in every case, especially for DM and SSC predictions

    where the VNIR method was close to twice as accurate. The VNIR method yielded

    accuracies (standard errors in prediction) of ± 0.40%, ± 0.71% and ± 1.05° for

    predictions of harvest DM, SSC and Hue, respectively. Predictions of post-storage

    DM, SSC and Hue, from post-storage spectra, had improved accuracies of ± 0.24%, ±

    0.31% and ± 0.98% respectively. The increased accuracy for SSC prediction, from ±

    0.71 to ± 0.31%, is theorized to be a consequence of the VNIR method being better at

    predicting the total carbohydrate concentration, which comprises starch and soluble

    sugars in about equal amounts at harvest but is mainly soluble sugar after the fruit

    ripens during cold storage. That theory was supported by the observation that post-

    storage SSC predictions based on harvest-time VNIR spectral models were also more

    accurate (± 0.38%) than the equivalent harvest-time SSC predictions. In addition,

    harvest-time DM predictions were shown to be capable of at least rank ordering (R2 =

    0.87) kiwifruit in terms of post-storage SSC.

  • CHAPTER 3: INFLUENCE OF STORAGE DURATION ON PHYSICO-

    CHEMICAL CHANGES IN FRUIT OF APPLE CULTIVARS

    Ibadullah Jan and Abdur Rab

    Department of Horticulture, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University

    Peshawar, Pakistan

    Abstract

    The experiment on “Influence of storage duration on physico-chemical changes in

    fruit of apple cultivars” was conducted at Department of Horticulture, Khyber

    Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University Peshawar, Pakistan during the years 2007-08.

    The fruit of apple cultivars: Royal Gala, Mondial Gala, Golden Delicious and Red

    Delicious were harvested at optimum maturity and stored at 5±1°C with 60-70%

    relative humidity. Physico-chemical changes in fruit were determined at 30 days

    interval during storage. Apple cultivar Red Delicious had the highest juice content

    (58.47%), TSS/Acid ratio (23.12), ascorbic acid (13.12 mg/100g), fruit flesh firmness

    (5.98 kg/cm2), fruit density (0.82 g/cm

    3) as well as the least weight loss (2.22%) but

    also had the highest bitter pit (11.86%) and soft rot (13.53%) incidence. Titratable

    acidity was the highest (0.55%) in cultivar Mondial Gala and starch score was the

    maximum (5.22) in cultivar Golden Delicious. The percent weight loss, total soluble

    solids, total sugar, pH, TSS/Acid ratio, bitter pit incidence and soft rot increased with

    increase in storage duration while juice content, starch score, titratable acidity,

    ascorbic acid, fruit flesh firmness and density of fruit declined with increase in storage

    duration.

  • 3.1. INTRODUCTION

    Apple (Pyrus domestica L) is one of the most important tree fruit of the world. The

    apple was cultivated in Greece around 600 BC or earlier. It is a highly nutritive fruit

    which is a rich source of sugars 11%, fat 0.4%, protein 0.3%, carbohydrates 14.9%,

    vitamins and minerals. A 100 g fresh apple contains, water 84.7 %, fibre 0.8 g,

    carbohydrates 13.9 g, proteins 0.4 g, lipid 0.3 g, ash 0.3 g, vitamin C 8 mg/100 gm,

    sodium 0.3 mg/100 g, potassium 145 mg/100 g, calcium 7 mg/100 g, magnesium 6

    mg/100 gm, iron 480 μg/100 g, phosphorus 12 mg and iodine 2 μg (Hussain, 2001).

    Due to its high nutritional value, it ranks third in consumption after citrus and banana

    (Bokhari, 2002). In Pakistan its cultivation is limited and restr