providing an overview of margining an eco-responsible ... · biopiracy nagoya protocol: apa of the...

Information Classification: General

PASS Fragrance, Flavour, Plants, Extracts

Providing an overview of margining an eco-responsible ingredient tool and labelling


➢ WHO we are

➢ Customer demand for efficient, safe, natural, eco-responsible products

➢ Collaborative project: how to capitalise on scientific and industrial expertise

➢ ERI 360° Standard


Raw Materials

Association to supportFragrance and Flavor industry and users

End ProductsTransformation - Production

Aromatic

2,7 Bn €

4800 employees

Cosmetic

3,2 Bn €

5800 employees

Food and

Suplements

350 Ml €

1500 employees

Transversal

services

75 Ml €

500 employees

150 Members

Acteurs & Members PASS

Producers


OUR MISSIONS

Support member’s competitiveness

Support sustainable growing

Improveemploymentand skills

Managecollaborative projects


Costumer demand for efficient, safe, natural, eco-responsible product

Consumer is looking for natural products in EU:

► Cosmetics: + 89% launches natural claim (2 382 launches in 2017)

► Food: + 20% launches natural claim (4 991 launches in 2017)

► Dietary supplements: 61% of launches contain at least 1 natural ingredientSource: Mintel

But are used with availability and low cost of synthetic products

The consumption of synthetic Vanillin is 12 000 to 15 000 tonnes per year while world vanilla trade (2 300 tonnes) corresponds to less than 50 tonnes of natural vanillin. A vanilla extract can cost 100 x more than a synthetic vanillin.Source: Eurovanille

How to solve this equation? Eco responsible extracts, bioprocess(microorganisms, cellular culture, etc)


6

Costumer demand for efficient, safe, natural, eco-responsible product

►Consumers of natural food supplements are particularly sensitive to the traceability of the supply and the quality of the plants

(a healthy product must be safe!)

►A large part of the consumers shows a strong appetite for organic products. In their mind plant based supplements are organic.

►Responsible consumers, they are attentive to environmental aspectSource: Pôle PASS members

Strong demand for natural, ethical and environmentally friendly products


Project to evaluate sustainability of supply chain and production process for vegetal extracts and bioprocess

ERI 360 project: PASS initiative driven by companies who wanted to benchmark and committed on:

➢ Produce durably

➢ Respect for Man

➢ Respect for the environment

➢ Continuous improvement

➢ Transparency

➢ Optimize natural resources

Cradle to gate

transport


Collaborative project: how to capitalize on scientific and industrial expertise

Industry

Ashland

Biolie

Charabot

Clarins

Cosmo

Expansciences

Gattefossé

Mane

Oléos

Pierre Fabre

Sederma/ Crodarom

Project team consolidation

Definition of the perimeter (extracts, bioprocess)

Benchmark of internalmethods

Definition of indicators and grid of evaluation


Collaborative project: how to capitalize scientific and industrial expertise

Ingredient tests: raw material and process

Questionary and grid correction

Academic expert’s evaluation

Adjustments

Web tool development

Experts

François Jérôme, Université

de Poitier, CNRS, IC2Mp et

ENSI Poitier

Phillipe Gallois, ITEIMAI

Thierry Talou, ENSACIET

Farid Chemat, Université

d’Avignon


ERI 360° Standard

The Eco Responsible Ingredient 360 ° standard : a complete analysis of your ingredients, including a clear visibility of agricultural practices, supply chain and production modes.

It includes existing regulation and standards on quality, environment and societal (CITES, IUCN, WHO pesticides, Carbon Base®, UEBT, Organic, ISO 16128, Social Hotspot database, etc.),

to constitute a true independent steering tool adapted to vegetal extraction and bioprocess.

100 indicators and practical calculators (CO2 finger print, OHB risk, natural index, etc).

It can be applied by the use of the web tool for continuous improvement or by ERI 360° Label adding value to your ingredients


Raw materialsRenewable materials

Optimize treatment and transport

SolvantsFocus on Solvents

with limited side effectson Man and

Environment, and recycling

ProcessEfficient, economical, safe

processesand respectful of manand the environment.

Co-productsDevelopment of co-products

to limit waste, reduce effluents

4 PrinciplesBased on Green

Chemistry


Pre requirements

Compliance with regulatory constraints (Nagoya, CITES, human rights, local labour law,

absence of child labour...)

Absence of GMOs,

Absence of abusive uses of traditional knowledge (raw material and method) to combat

biopiracy

Absence of pesticides extremely dangerous list of WHO (Classes Ia and Ib)

Absence of CMR,

Method of non-destructive production for the species and its ecosystem.


Check-list

References Evidence

Absence of GMONon-GMO certificates of risk inputs and/or analyses of GMOs (derived from microorganisms: enzymes, soybean derivatives, maize, etc.)

Absence of abusive uses of traditional knowledge (raw material and method) to combat biopiracy

Nagoya Protocol: APA of the country in question (local regulation)

List of protected species in the country, CBD, CITES, TIRPAA

UEBT audit, APA FRB country cards

-Local regulations analysis (country list under construction)-Agreements with the State, regional bodies, farmers for benefit-sharing-No patents that prevent the local community from using their traditional knowledge.-Culture agricultural specification(botanical museums, universities)

Absence of pesticides extremely dangerous list of WHO (Classes Ia and Ib)

WHO list ORGANIC agriculture certificate, pm or PF pestic analyses

Absence of CMRTechnical data sheet for risk inputs: (absence of mentions H 350, H 340 or H 360)

Method of non-destructive production for the species and its ecosystem

Organic production, agricultural management (crop rotation, environmental consideration), agroforestry practices

Audit reports, certifications


2 Approachs

• Management and continuous improvement • Label : added value

➢ ERI Label 360 °

➢ External expertise on site

➢ Award of the Label for 3 years


Structure of the evaluation

Score« Environment »

Score Vegetal Raw material

Water fingerprint

Carbone fingerprint

I 1

Country risk

I 2

I 3

Score for each indicator

Indicator Thematic

Score« Social »

Scoreglobal

Emploees Healthy and Security

…

I 4

…

…

…

Score« Transversal »

Supplier transparency

Industrial Ecology

V1.1

I 2


Continuous improvement

➢Web Tool

Service Cost*

1 training day1 200 €

1 to 10 ingredients 2 000 €

10 à 25 ingredients 3 000 €

25 à 50 ingredients 5 000 €

> 50 7 000 €

* : + 500 € non members of the Cluster


Label

➢ Audit expertise

Ingredient number Cost (out of taxes)

1 3 000 €

1 ingredient of the same family 500 €

2 5 400€

3 7 650€

➢ Contact : Gislene Da Silva [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]


Evaluation Structure, Raw Material example

Number Criteria TypeMax Score

Indicator Descriptor Priority Max Score Threshold Grid

1Supplier

transparencyT 20

Traceability and transmission of information

This indicator assesses the source of the information

2 5

Information directly from the Producer/Collector(direct) 5Information directly from the Distributor/Dealer (indirect) 3No information about the supply chain 1No information 0

Awareness about the supplier and the supply chain

This indicator assesses the level of awareness about the producer of the raw material.

1 15

Audit of the producer/Collector 5Field visit to producer/collector 3Exchange with producer/collector or distributor/trader only by telephone and email 1No information 0

2Environmental, RSE

and quality approach

T 15

Quality managementThis indicator assesses the quality approach of the production site of the raw material..

2 5

Existence of an approach with external certification 5Existence of an approach with internal reporting 4Existence of an approach without internal reporting 3Any etablished approach 1No information 0

Environment management

This indicator assesses the environmental approach of the production site of the raw material.

2 5


Corporate Social Responsibility

This indicator assesses the CSR approach of the production site of the raw material

2 5



Evaluation Structure, Raw Material example

Number Criteria TypeMax Score

Indicator Descriptor PriorityMax Score

Threshold Grid

3 Industrial ecology T 0 Industrial ecology

Is the raw material used a co-product of another industry (egagri-food)?The attainment of the bonus must involve a transformation of the waste status to co-product status for the raw material used.

B 0 The raw material is a co-product

5

4

Geographical origin of raw materials and

carbon footprint

E 30

Origin (Traceability) of the raw material

This indicator assesses the degree of informations about the provenance of the raw material.

1*E 15

Knowledge of Fields (GPS and batch) / IP certified origin 5Knowledge of the region 3Knowledge of the country 1No information 0

Carbon footprint of logistic scenario

This indicator assesses the carbon footprint of the logistic scenario of the delivery of the raw material according to the distances traveled and the means of transport used.

1 15

Less than 1,56E-02 kgCO2éq for transporting the raw material required for one kg of finished product 5Between 1,56E-02 and 1,63E-01 kgCO2éq for transporting the raw material required for one kg of finished product 4Between 1,63E-01 and 4,2E-01 kgCO2éq for transporting the raw material required for one kg of finished product 3More than 4,2E-01 kgCO2éq for transporting the raw material required for one kg of finished product 1No information 0


Evaluation Structure, Process example

Number CriteriaScore Max

Conformity Number Indicator Description Priority Number Thresold Note

5Water

footprint35 Yes

9 Local climate

This indicator assesses access to water by the climate of the production site of the raw material.

2

36Abundant access to water by the climate: list of associated climates 5

37Access to average water or alternating with water by climate: list of associated climates 3

38Access to low water by climate: list of associatedclimatesAccès l'eau faible par le climat : liste climats associés 2

39Access to very low water by the climate: list of associated climates 1

40 No information 0

10Grey water treatment

This indicator assesses practices in terms of grey water treatment at the raw material production site.

1

41 No aqeuous effluent 5

42 Effluents fully treated in-situ at biological station 4

43Effluents fully treated on-site in a chemical station or reprocessed by a service provider 3

44 Effluents returned to the collective water system 245 Effluents rejected in the natural environment 146 No information 0

11Consumption in water of the bio-processes

This indicator assesses the water consumption of bioprocesses for the production of the raw material sufficient for the manufacture of 1 kg of finished product (extract/hemisynthesis).

1

47 Less than 3 liters 548 Between 3 and 8 liters 449 Between 8 and 30 liters 350 More than 30 liters 1

51 No information0


Evaluation Structure, Process example

Number CriteriaScore Max

Number Indicator Description Priority Number Threshold Grid

8 Waste 20

15Bio-wastemanagement

This indicator assesses the biowaste management practices generated at the place of production of the raw material.

1

64100% of valued waste (compost, methanization, biomass, boilers, etc.) 5

65More than 75% of valued waste (compost, methanization, boiler biomass, etc.) 4

66Between 50 and 75% of valued waste (compost, methanization, boiler biomass, etc.) 3

6Less than 50% of valued waste (compost, methanization, boiler biomass, etc.) 2

68 0% of valued waste (compost, methanization, boiler biomass, etc.) 169 No information 0

16Waste management -excluding biowaste

This indicator assesses the waste management practices (excluding plant waste) generated at the place of production of the raw material.

2

70 Recycled wastes 571 Treated wastes 472 Waste collected (picked up out of the field) 373 Not collected waste 1

74 No information0

17 CoproductsIs one of the waste generated used as a co-product in another economic sector?

B

75At least one of the wastes generated is used as a co-product in another economic stream 5

76None of the waste generated is used as a co-product in another economic stream 0

77 No information 0


Outil Web

Evaluation Tool


23

Evaluation Tool


24

THANK YOU

https://www.facebook.com/polepass/

https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/11110761

providing an overview of margining an eco-responsible ... · biopiracy nagoya protocol: apa of the...

Documents