pros and cons of mips data submission methods...pros and cons of mips data submission methods this...

25
Date: October 12, 2017 Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality Improvement Organization, under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents presented do not necessarily reflect CMS policy11SOW-QIN-D1-12/15/16-11918

Upload: others

Post on 06-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

Date: October 12, 2017

Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods

This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality Improvement Organization, under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents presented do not necessarily reflect CMS policy11SOW-QIN-D1-12/15/16-11918

Page 2: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

2

• Telligen: Quality Innovation Network-Quality Improvement Organization (QIN-QIO) for Colorado, Illinois and Iowa

• Subject Matter Experts for CMS Quality Performance Initiatives

Telligen QIN QIO

Sandy Swallow Iowa Linda Brewer

Illinois

Temaka Williams Illinois

Courtnay Ryan Colorado

Page 3: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

3

• Discuss mechanics of multiple data submission methods

• Share QPP updates and recent news

• Open discussion with sharing and Q & A

Today’s Agenda

Page 4: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

4 © 2016, Telligen, Inc.

When is MIPS 2017 information due?

• Performance period Jan. 1, 2017 – Dec. 31, 2017

• Last day to begin partial (90 day) participation is Oct. 2

• Data submission period: Due to CMS January 1, 2018 – March 31, 2018

• Deadlines for particular EHR or Registry vendors may be earlier – Important to check with your vendor

• Doing the work to generate the information you will need to submit should be happening now

Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods

Page 5: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

5 © 2016, Telligen, Inc.

What do I need to know before submitting data?

• CMS allows multiple options – Only one data submission method for a single performance category

– Option to use a different method for each category

• Some options and instructions for data submission are still under development by CMS – UGH!

• Picking measures and choosing how to submit data are interconnected – Consider both

Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods

Page 6: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

6

Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods

6

Quality

Claims Qualified Registry

QCDR EHR Direct

Web Interface (25+)

Improvement Activities

Qualified Registry

QCDR EHR Direct

Attestation Portal Web Interface (25+)

Advancing Care Information

Qualified Registry

QCDR EHR Direct

Attestation Portal Web Interface

(25+)

What must be submitted and how?

Page 7: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

7 © 2016, Telligen, Inc.

How does it work?

• CMS-approved entity that collects clinical data from a clinician

or group and submits it to CMS on their behalf.

• Registry integrates directly with CMS via an API (new way) or

generates and XML file (old way)

• Each registry has met certain criteria and provides detailed information on the list

• Requires reporting on all patients and payers

• Annual qualified registry list available in advance

https://qpp.cms.gov/docs/QPP_2017_Qualified_Registries.pdf

Qualified Registry Submission Method

Page 8: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

8 © 2016, Telligen, Inc.

How does it work?

• CMS-approved entity that collects clinical data from a clinician or

group and submits it to CMS on their behalf.

• Available to individual MIPS eligible clinicians and groups

• Must submit data via a CMS-specified secure method for data submission, such as a QRDA or XML file.

• Requires reporting on all patients and payers

• Different from a registry

– Not limited to QPP measures

– Can’t by owned or managed by an individual specialty group

• Annual QCDR list available in advance with detailed information

– https://qpp.cms.gov/docs/QPP_2017_CMS_Approved_QCDRs.pdf

Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR)

Submission Method

Page 9: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

9

Registries and QCDR: Tips and Advice

Tips:

• Many professional societies offer inexpensive options to members

• Pick carefully since the real goal is improving care for your patients

• Find out what the data submission deadlines are since they are earlier than CMS deadlines

Pros: • Largest number of quality

measures available

• Greatest amount of flexibility

• Often comes with advisory services

• Multiple registries available

– Some free or cheap

Cons: • Some require manual entry

• Some are costly

• May be time consuming to enroll

Page 10: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

10 © 2016, Telligen, Inc.

How does it work?

• Two options – Clinicians submit data to CMS directly through the use of their

certified EHR system

– Work with a third-party qualified health-IT vendor who will submit the

data on their behalf Data is extracted from the EHR technology to an intermediary, the intermediary

would then submit the measures and activity data to CMS in a CMS-specified form

and manner.

• ONC certification process has established standards and

criteria that must be met

• Available to individuals and groups

• Requires reporting on all patients and payers

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Submission Method

Page 11: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

11

EHR: Tips and Advice

Tips: • If you report multiple CQMs,

CMS will use those yielding the best scores

• Check costs and functionalities carefully before investing

• Get advice from peers or support organizations before choosing an EHR

• Can still avoid a penalty in year one without an EHR

Pros: • Can earn higher MIPS scores by

receiving bonus points

• Allows for real time assessments of quality scores

• Eliminates the need to use a separate submission mechanism

Cons: • Not all EHRs have the ability to

support data submission

• Access may be costly and vendors may charge extras

Page 12: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

12 © 2016, Telligen, Inc.

How does it work?

• Clinicians select measures and report through claims

• Various QPP codes must be submitted on the initial claim in conjunction with applicable billing codes to denominator eligible claims

• Measure Specification Document provides details and codes to include on claim

• Not available to group reporting (individual EC only)

• Reporting on Medicare patients only

Claims-Based Submission Method

Page 13: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

13

Claims-Based: Tips and Advice

Tips:

• Can be used to avoid year 1 penalty but not a long-term substitute for having an EHR or participating in a registry

• Claims can not be used for data submission for ACI or IA categories

• Read Measure Specification Sheet carefully

Pros: • Provide continuity if you’re

already submitting quality measures through your claims biller

• Free

Cons: • Least flexible

• Least accurate

• No real time results

• Not available for group reporting

Page 14: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

14 © 2016, Telligen, Inc.

How does it work?

• Secure internet-based application available to groups of 25 or more MIPS clinicians under a single TIN used to report data to CMS

• Formerly known as GPRO reporting option

• Agree to report on all 15 CMS WI measures

• Must submit full calendar year of data

• Preregistration is required

• Group will report on a sample of 248 MC beneficiaries

• CMS Web-Interface Fact Sheet

CMS Web-Interface Submission Method

Page 15: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

15

CMS Web-Interface: Tips and Advice

Tips:

• Prepare early

• Determine group size

• Complete registration process (when available for 2018)

• CMS provides prepopulated claims data – be prepared to populate remaining data fields

Pros: • Eliminate need search for &

select measures

• CMS identifies patients for reporting

• Group advantages

Cons: • Must submit 12 months of quality

data (90 days IA and ACI)

• Preregistration required

Page 16: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

16 © 2016, Telligen, Inc.

How does it work?

• Proposed:

– Data submission method for ACI and IA

– Will be available for individuals and groups

– Requires reporting on all patients and payers

– Waiting for more guidance

Attestation Portal Submission Method

Page 17: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

17

Key Takeaways

• Can only use one submission method per category

• Choose a submission method that best suites the needs, capabilities and goals of your practice/organization – Look at costs and benefits

– Consider internet/technology access, financial costs, and administrative burdens

• Qualified Registries and QCDRs are available across all categories and reporting types (individual vs. group)

• Attestation portal is “proposed” to be no cost

• Consider submission methods that are sustainable for reporting in future years

Page 18: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

18

• 2016 PQRS Feedback Reports and 2016 Annual QRUR reports

– Status on 2018 downward payment adjustment for PQRS and VMP

– Access via EIDM Account

• Advanced APM participants Qualifying Participant (QP) determinations based on the first 2017 snapshot period

– Qualifying APM Participant Look-Up Tool

QPP Updates News

Flash!

Page 19: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

19

New QPP Resources

Telligen QINQIO Website

– MIPS Calculator for non-APM eligible clinicians

– MIPS Calculator demonstration

– MIPS Calculations Worksheet

https://telligenqinqio.com/our-work/quality-payment-program/quality-payment-program-resources/

Page 20: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

20

• CMS QPP Website: – MIPS Specialty Measures Guide

Anesthesiologist and CRNAs

Emergency Medicine Clinics

Ophthalmologists

Orthopedists

– Group Participation in MIPS Guide

– CMS-approved QCDR Vendor List for 2017

– How to Design an APM Toolkit

– Quality Performance Category Fact Sheet

https://qpp.cms.gov/about/resource-library

New QPP Resources

Page 21: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

21

Page 22: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

22

QPP Q & A

• Q. Please provide more information on the definition and requirements to be considered a specialized registry?

Page 23: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

23

Telligen QIN-QIO is Here to Help!

• Experienced quality improvement advisors to provide expert technical assistance and quality improvement support for participating providers across the state

• Join the monthly webinars “Coffee Talks” with subject matter experts:

– Focused QPP topic

– Open discuss with Q & A – dedicated to your questions

– 2nd Thursday every month

– 11:00 a.m. CST for 1 hour

Nov. 9th

Dec. 14th - Final Rule for 2018

• Partner with Telligen QIO on practice improvement activities

– Participation with a QIO in a self-management training program (diabetes)

– Implementation of antibiotic stewardship program

– Implementation of a cardiac quality improvement program

Page 24: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

24

CMS Help Desks

QPP Service Center 1-866-288-8292 Email: [email protected]

Page 25: Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods...Pros and Cons of MIPS Data Submission Methods This material was prepared by Telligen, the Medicare Quality Innovation Network Quality

25

Thank you for Joining Us!

Contacts: • Iowa – Sandy Swallow

– 515-223-2105

[email protected]

• Illinois – Linda Brewer

– 630-928-5819

[email protected]

• Illinois -Temaka Williams

– 630-928-5838

[email protected]

• Colorado – Courtnay Ryan

– 720-554-1711

[email protected]

www.TelligenQINQIO.com