propulsion controls and diagnostics research at nasa grc – status report

9
Controls and Dynamics Branch at Lewis Field Glenn Research Center Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report Dr. Sanjay Garg Branch Chief Ph: (216) 433-2685 FAX: (216) 433-8990 email: [email protected] http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/cdtb Presented at: Aerospace Guidance and Control System Committee Meeting Boulder, CO, March 1, 2007

Upload: ingo

Post on 12-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report. Dr. Sanjay Garg Branch Chief Ph: (216) 433-2685 FAX: (216) 433-8990 email: [email protected] http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/cdtb. Presented at: Aerospace Guidance and Control System Committee Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report

Controls and Dynamics Branch at Lewis FieldGlenn Research Center

Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report

Dr. Sanjay GargBranch Chief

Ph: (216) 433-2685FAX: (216) 433-8990

email: [email protected]://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/cdtb

Presented at: Aerospace Guidance and Control System Committee MeetingBoulder, CO, March 1, 2007

Page 2: Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report

Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate

Hypersonics

Fundamental Aeronautics Program

Aviation Safety Program

Airspace Systems Program

Supersonics

Subsonic Fixed Wing

Subsonic Rotary Wing

Integrated VehicleHealth

Management

Next Generation

AirTransportation

System

Super-DensitySurface

Management

Integrated Resilient Aircraft Control

Integrated Flight Deck

TechnologiesAging

Aircraft

NASA Aeronautics’ Program Structure

Page 3: Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report

Controls and Dynamics Branch at Lewis FieldGlenn Research Center

Propulsion Control for Fundamental Aeronautics

Fundamental Aeronautics Program

HypersonicsSupersonicsSubsonicFixed Wing

SubsonicRotary Wing

• Distributed Engine Control

• Active Flow Control for Compression Systems

• Unsteady Combustion / Ejection Systems

• Integrated Engine and Transmission control

• Active Combustion Control

• Integrated inlet / engine control

• High Speed propulsion control and integration with flight control

• Mode Switch management

Page 4: Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report

Controls and Dynamics Branch at Lewis FieldGlenn Research Center

Propulsion Control and Diagnostics for Aviation Safety

Aviation Safety Program

AADIIFDIntegrated Vehicle Health Management

Integrated Resilient Aircraft Control

• Self awareness and prognosis of gas path, combustion, and overall engine state; fault-tolerant system architecture

• Gas Path health management

•…..

• Damage tolerance and design for extended envelope operation; onboard hazard effects assessment, mitigation and recovery

Propulsion HealthManagement

………

Resilient PropulsionControl

………

Page 5: Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report

CPU /Memory

Actuationelectronics

Sensorelectronics

Sensorelectronics

Actuationelectronics

Sensorelectronics

Actuationelectronics

Actuator_1

Sensor_1

Sensor_ j

Actuator_n

Sensor_2

Actuator_2

Communication

Power

BU

S

FADEC

Current Engine Control ArchitectureCurrent Engine Control Architecture• Centralized with each sensor/actuator directly connected to FADEC

Page 6: Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report
Page 7: Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report

Controls and Dynamics Branch at Lewis FieldGlenn Research Center

Centralized Engine ControlCentralized Engine Control

• Pros: – Works, reliable, well-understood, experience,

comfort level• Cons:

– Expensive, inflexible, in the future will become a limiting factor in engine performance

– Wire harness weight forces the FADEC to be co-located on the engine structure

– Co-located FADEC requires environmental hardening (thermal, mechanical) further increasing weight and cost.

– Complicates fault detection and isolation

Page 8: Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report

CPU /Memory

Actuator_1

Sensor_1

Sensor_ j

Actuator_n

Sensor_2

Actuator_2

Communication

Power

FADEC

Distributed Engine ControlDistributed Engine Control

Communication

Actuationelectronics

Sensorelectronics

Sensorelectronics

Actuationelectronics

Sensorelectronics

Actuationelectronics

BU

S

Page 9: Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC – Status Report

Controls and Dynamics Branch at Lewis FieldGlenn Research Center

Distributed Engine ControlDistributed Engine Control

• Topologies:– Star (point to point), Ring or bus (daisy chain)– Wired or wireless

• Pros: – Known to work well in other industries, much less

expensive (initial and overall cost), very flexible• Cons:

– Communication unknowns and deterministic behavior

– Overall increased complexity– Requires new technologies, i.e., high temperature

electronics