proposed warwick flyover outbound: between leopold street ... · the proposed project will link the...

ETHEKWINI MUNICIPALITY

Proposed Warwick Flyover Outbound: Between Leopold Street and Cleaver Road DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT

REPORT Issue Date: 01 September 2008 Revision No.: No. 2 Project No.: 9009 Ref No.: DM/0141/07

Date: 01 September 2008

Document Title:

Proposed Warwick Fyover Outbound: Between Leopold Street and Cleaver Road

Author:

Lebohang Tsoene

Revision Number:

#2

Checked by:

Michelle Nevette

Approved:

Michelle Nevette

Signature:

For:

SiVEST Environmental Division


DM/0141/07 PROPOSED WARWICK FYOVER OUTBOUND: BETWEEN LEOPOLD

STREET AND CLEAVER ROAD

DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Contents

DAEA Basic Assessment Report

Appendices

Appendix A: Site plans

Appendix A1: Proposed Outbound Route Plan

Appendix A2: Illustration of Flyover at Russell Street/Leopold Street Intersection

Appendix B: Site photographs

Appendix C: Facility illustration(s)

Appendix C1: Warwick Flyover Outbound Locality Map

Appendix C2: Locality Road Map of the proposed site and Inbound Flyover locality

Appendix C3: Locality of cultural sites

Appendix C4: Surrounding Land uses

Appendix D: Specialist reports

None

Appendix E: Public participation process

Appendix E1: Public Participation Report

Appendix E2: Comments and Response Report

Appendix F: Impact assessment report

Department of Agriculture & Environmental Affairs,

KwaZulu-Natal

Basic Assessment Report Version 5, March 2007

Page 1 of 42

KZN Agriculture and Environmental Affairs Mnyango: eZolimo neZemvelo

SIFUNDAZWE SAKWAZULU-NATALI

___________________________________________________________________________________

Basic Assessment Report in terms of the

Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2006

Kindly note that:

1. This basic assessment report meets the requirements of regulation 23 of the EIA Regulations, 2006 and is meant to streamline applications.

2. The report may be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing.

3. Where applicable cross the boxes that are applicable or black out the boxes that are not applicable in the report.

4. An incomplete report will be returned to the applicant for revision. 5. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used

in respect of material information that is required by this department for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations.

6. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner. 7. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt

by this department. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request, during any stage of the application process.

8. This department may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report need to be completed. In addition, if it is clear to the EAP that because of the particular circumstances of the case it is not sensible to complete any of the sections indicated under paragraph 3 of this report, he or she may apply for exemption from completing that part of the report in the spaces provided in the report. It must however be noted that if the application for exemption is turned down, the report may have to be resubmitted.

9. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted. 10. This application must be handed in or posted to the appropriate Regional Office of the

KwaZulu-Natal Department of Agriculture and Environmental Affairs at one of the following addresses:

FOR APPLICATIONS IN NORTHERN KWAZULU-NATAL (Amajuba, Umkhanyakude,

Uthungulu, Umzinyathi and Zululand District Municipalities) Environment: North Region KwaZulu Natal Department of Agriculture and Environmental Affairs Private Bag X1048 RICHARDS BAY 3900 4th Floor ABSA Building Lakeview Terrace RICHARDS BAY Contact Person: Ms Zama Mbanjwa Telephone No.: (035) 780 6706


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 2 of 42

FOR APPLICATIONS IN SOUTHERN KWAZULU-NATAL (Ethekwini Metro, Ilembe,

Sisonke, Ugu, Umgungundlovu and Uthukela District Municipalities): Environment: South Region KwaZulu-Natal Department of Agriculture and Environmental Affairs Private Bag X6005 HILTON 3245 A Block 4 Pin Oak Avenue HILTON Contact Person: Ms Mavis Padayachee Telephone No.: (033) 343 8428

COMPLETION OF THIS REPORT Please indicate the numbers of the sections of this report that have not been completed: Section C: 6(a) 6(b) 6(c) 6(d) 7 8 9(c) 9(e) 9(f) 9(g) 9(h) 10 x Section D: 1 2 x 3 4 5 6 Section E: 1(a) 1(b) 1(c) 1(d) 1(f) 1(g) 3 Provide detailed reasons for not completing the sections indicated: Section Reasons for not completing C 10 The Site / Route Plan has not provided contour intervals due to the nature of the proposal

The exact position of photographs has not been indicated on the layout, due to the number of photographs taken within the vicinity.

D2 n/a The proposed site is situated within an urban area

SECTION A: APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION Please provide details regarding any application for exemption from the requirements of the EIA Regulations, 2006: Has an application for exemption been submitted to the Department?

YES NO X

Has an Exemption Notice in respect of an application for exemption been issued? YES NO X Is a copy of the Exemption Notice attached to this report?

YES NO X


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 3 of 42

SECTION B: DETAILS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER AND SPECIALISTS

1. NAME AND CONTACT DETAILS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER (EAP)

Name and contact details of the EAP who prepared this report:

Business name of EAP:

SiVEST Environmental Division

Physical address: 4 Pencarrow Crescent La Lucia Office Estate Postal address: P O Box 1899 Umhlanga Rocks Postal code: 4320 Telephone: 031 581 1575 Fax: 031 566 2371 E-mail: [email protected]

2. NAMES AND EXPERTISE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE EAP Names and details of the expertise of each representative of the EAP involved in the preparation of this report:

Name of representative of the EAP

Educational qualifications Experience at environmental assessments (yrs)

Michelle Nevette M.Sc Environmental Management 9 Lebohang Tsoene B.Sc Environmental Science 3 Louise Bester BSc Honours in Water Science

(North West University RSA 2005) 1

Saskie Lovel MSc (res) in Zoology (University of KwaZulu-Natal)

8

3. NAMES AND EXPERTISE OF SPECIALISTS Names and details of the expertise of each specialist that has contributed to this report:

Name of specialist Educational qualifications Experience in field of expertise


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 4 of 42

SECTION C: ACTIVITY INFORMATION 1. PROJECT INFORMATION a. Project title PROPOSED WARWICK AVENUE OUTBOUND FLYOVER: BETWEEN CLEAVER ROAD & LEOPOLD STREET b. Project description Describe your project in detail: The eThekwini Municipality is proposing to construct an elevated flyover to serve as an extension of the Western Freeway on the outbound carriageway. The proposed activity forms part of the Municipality's two initiatives to improve transportation networks and roads across the CDB in preparation for the 2010 World cup and beyond. The construction of the flyover is expected to be completed by May 2010. The Warwick Precinct is characterized by high volumes of traffic that cut through the area, adding no value to the area and indeed detracting from its attractiveness. The high levels of traffic create an unsafe environment for residents, pedestrians and commuters alike and are a barrier to redevelopment and growth of the area. In order to address this issue, the eThekwini Municipality is proposing to separate the through traffic from the activities of Warwick Junction through the construction of flyovers that take all through traffic over the highly congested quadrant of Market, Warwick, Leopold, Johannes Nkosi (formerly known as Alice Street). The proposed project will link the Western Freeway and Leopold Street (terminating just before Russell Street), thus by-passing the highly congested Leopold / Market and Leopold / Warwick intersections on the outbound carriageway, and thereby improving traffic flow through the area in a safe and efficient manner.The proposed project length is approximately 800m comprising 3x3.5m lanes. The proposed layout of the flyover is attached in Appendix A. The inbound flyover currently under construction will link the Western Freeway and Johannes Nkosi Street (terminating just before Russell Street), thus by-passing the highly congested Old Dutch Road/Johannes Nkosi Street/Market Road intersections on the inbound carriageway. The two flyovers will ensure improved pedestrian and public transport flow within the precinct. Construction of the inbound flyover id expected to be completed in November 2009 The proposed development will affect a number of land users in the precinct and their daily operations during the construction phase. A building inside the SEDA property between Market and Russell Street, a bus rank located on the north-eastern quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection, and a taxi rank located on the north-western quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection will need to be temporarily closed as they fall within the construction footprint of the proposed outbound flyover. Normal operation of Leopold Street and Russell Street and surrounding road network will also be affected during construction; A number of lanes will remain closed on Leopold Street during construction. 2. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION

Describe the activity / activities which is / are being applied for in detail: Activity 1(K): the bulk transportation of sewage and water, including storm water, in pipelines with - (i) an internal diameter of 0,36 metres or more; or (ii) a peak throughput of 120 litres per second or more Activity 15: The construction of a road that is wider than 4 metres or that has a reserve wider than 6 metres, excluding roads that fall within the ambit of another listed activity or which are access roads of less than 30 metres long.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 5 of 42

3. ALTERNATIVES Describe alternatives that are considered in this application. Consideration of alternatives must not be limited to site and layout alternatives only. Alternatives assessed must include the consideration of alternative technologies, processes and activities by means of which the objectives of the proposed project may be achieved. The no-go alternative must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the other alternatives are assessed. The determination of whether site or activity (including different processes etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. After receipt of this report the competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent for informed decision making. a. Site alternatives: Describe site alternative 1 (S1), (selected site) for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative:

Option 5 - Route alignment options. These were discounted due to impacts on existing buildings including historical site. This is discussed further below.

Option 6 - Current preferred option. This offers the best balanced solution.

Leopold Street currently serves as the main route directing traffic from the north of the city and the beachfront through the CBD via Warwick Precinct, to major areas west of Durban and visitors going back to Johannesburg or the airport. In order to improve traffic flow in terms of travel time, safety, sense of place etc, eThekwini Municipality has realised the need to re-direct traffic exiting the city away for the Warwick Junction, hence the proposed flyover will link Leopold Street with the western freeway directly. The Traffic Department has considered alignment issues taking into consideration existing buildings, existing services, horizontal alignment design criteria, positioning of abutments and support structures and other aspects and agreed upon the current proposal that has been designed. No other feasible alternatives were identified in this regard. Any other realignment from Leopold to the Western Freeway would require permanent demolishing of buildings and disruption of the railway lines further north-east of Russell Street/Leopold Street intersection. The original layout presented at the public meeting held on the 20th August 2007 (Minutes attached in Appendix E2) illustrated the flyover to terminate just before Grey Street thereby affecting the railway lines, however the layout has since been amended to ensure that the railway lines are not affected. It is determined therefore, in terms of the explanation given above, that no other feasible alternatives exist for the proposed Warwick Flyover Outbound due to existing land uses and infrastructure surrounding the proposed site. In making a decision regarding the proposed development, the potential impacts on the proposed site by the development during construction should be weighed against the need for the proposed flyover outbound and its associated benefits. The proposed design of the road has to a degree taken into account the potential impacts on site, especially with regard to the existing land uses and infrastructure in close proximity to the road. Describe site alternative 2 (S2), if any, for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative: Describe site alternative 3 (S3), if any, for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative: b. Layout alternatives: Describe layout alternative 1 (L1), if any for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative: Describe layout alternative 2 (L2), if any, for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative: Describe layout alternative 3 (L3), if any, for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative: c. Process (technology) alternatives: Describe process alternative 1 (P1), if any for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative:

Option 2 - Do Minimum – This option involves at grade improvements to improve safety but still does not address the underlying problem.

Describe process alternative 2 (P2), if any, for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative:


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 6 of 42

Option 3 - Pedestrian Overpass – This would address the problem but due to site constraints results in the up and down movement of pedestrians which results in a resistance to utilise, hence problem not fully addressed.

Describe process alternative 3 (P3), if any, for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative: Option 4 - Vehicle Underpass - Problems with underground services and tie-into existing infrastructure.

In terms of the explanation given above no other feasible alternatives exist for the proposed Warwick Flyover Outbound due to existing land uses and infrastructure surrounding the proposed site. In making a decision regarding the proposed development the potential impacts on the proposed site by the development during construction should be weighed against the need for the proposed flyover and its associated benefits. The proposed design of the road has to some degree taken into account the potential impacts on site, especially with regard to the existing land uses and infrastructure in close proximity to the road. 4. ACTIVITY POSITION

Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes should have at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection. Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E): Alternative S11 (preferred site alternative) o ‘ o ‘ Alternative S2 (if any) o ‘ o ‘ Alternative S3 (if any) o ‘ o ‘ In the case of linear activities: Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E): Alternative S1 (preferred or only route alternative) • Starting point of the activity (on Leopold Street) 29 0 15.15 31o 00’.48 • End point of the activity (on N3 Western Freeway) 29 0 51‘20 31o 00’.28 Alternative S2 (if any) • Starting point of the activity o ‘ o ‘ • End point of the activity o ‘ o ‘ Alternative S3 (if any) • Starting point of the activity o ‘ o ‘ • End point of the activity o ‘ o ‘ For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with co-ordinates taken every 500 meters along the route for each alternative alignment. 5. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY Indicate the physical size of the proposed activity as related to layout alternatives: Alternative: Size of the layout: Alternative L12 (preferred layout alternative)

m2

Alternative L2 (if any) m2 Alternative L3 (if any) m2 or, for linear activities: Alternative: Length of the activity: Alternative L1 (preferred layout alternative) The proposed design of the link is approximately The proposed project length is approximately 800m comprising 3x3.5m lanes, of which the elevated section will be approximately 900m long. Refer to the attached layout for illustrations

800 m

Alternative L2 (if any) m Alternative L3 (if any) m

1 “Alternative S..” refer to site alternatives. 2 “Alternative A..” refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 7 of 42

Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints will occur): Alternative: Size of the site/servitude: Alternative S1 (preferred site alternative) m2 Alternative S2 (if any) m2 Alternative S3 (if any) m2 6. SITE ACCESS Does ready access to the site exist, or is access directly from an existing road? YES √ NO If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built m Describe the type of access road planned: It is envisaged that the main entrance to the site will be Leopold Street and exit will be from the existing Leopold/Market road joining the Western Freeway. Include the position of the access road on the site plan. 7. WASTE, EFFLUENT AND NOISE MANAGEMENT

Please note that the following environmental issues must be described for each alternative site, layout and process.

a. Solid waste management Will the activity produce solid waste during the construction/initiation phase? YES NO If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? ±1000 m3 How will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)? Disposal to municipal landfill site; Any solid waste produced during construction should be collected into a skipper or an appropriate container and be disposed of on a regular basis as required to the municipal landfill site. Where will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)? Disposal to Bisasar Road municipal landfill site Will the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase? YES NO If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? n/a m3 How will the solid waste be disposed of (describe)? n/a Where will the solid waste be disposed if it does not feed into a municipal waste stream (describe)? n/a If the solid waste (construction or operational phases) will not be disposed of in a registered landfill site or be taken up in a municipal waste stream, this must be brought to the attention of the competent authority. Can any part of the solid waste be classified as hazardous in terms of the relevant legislation? YES NO If yes, inform the competent authority and request a change to an application for scoping and EIA. Is the activity that is being applied for, for that of a solid waste handling or treatment facility? YES NO If yes, the applicant must consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. Describe the measures, if any, that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of materials: Reuse of excess/disposed material as cover at landfill site Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO If YES, please complete: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: b. Liquid effluent Will the activity produce effluent, other than domestic sewage? YES NO If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? n/a m3


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 8 of 42

If not, how will this effluent be disposed of?

Will the activity produce any effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of on site? Yes NO If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at another facility? YES NO If yes, provide the particulars of the facility: Facility name: Contact person: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste water, if any: n/a Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO If YES, please complete: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: c. Emissions into the atmosphere Will the activity release emissions into the atmosphere? YES NO If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

If no, describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration: Dust during construction; this will be controlled during implementation of the EMP. Vehicle emissions from construction vehicles will be controlled through the

implementation of the EMP. Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this? YES NO If YES, please complete: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: d. Generation of noise Will the activity generate noise? YES NO If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

If no, describe the noise in terms of type and level: Noise from construction vehicles will be controlled during implementation of the EMP

Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO If YES, please complete: Name of the specialist:


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 9 of 42

Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: 8. WATER USE

Please note that the following issue must be described for each alternative site, layout and process. Please indicate the source(s) of water that will be used for the activity by crossing the appropriate box(es) Municipal

X water board groundwater river, stream, dam or

lake other the activity will not use

water If water is to be extracted from groundwater, river, stream, dam, lake or any other natural feature, please indicate the volume that will be extracted per month: n/a litres Does the activity require a water use permit from the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry? YES NO If yes, please submit the necessary application to the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry and attach proof thereof to this application if it has been submitted. 9. ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Please note that the following issue must be described for each alternative site, layout and process. Describe the design measures, if any, that have been taken to ensure that the activity is energy efficient: None Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the design of the activity, if any: None 10. SITE OR ROUTE PLAN

A detailed site or route plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity. It must be attached as Appendix A to this document. The site or route plans must indicate the following: 10(a) the scale of the plan (appropriate to the extent of the development); 10(b) the property boundaries and erf or farm numbers of the adjoining properties; 10(c) the current land use as well as the land use zoning of each of the properties adjoining the site or sites; 10(d) the position of each element of the application as well as any other structures on the site; 10(e) the position of services (e.g. electricity supply cables, water supply pipelines, boreholes, sewage pipelines

and storm water infrastructure) including servitudes and the purpose of such servitudes; 10(f) sensitive environmental elements on the site/s and within 100m of the site/s including (but not limited thereto):

Rivers, streams and drainage lines; wetlands; the 1:100 year flood line (where available or where it is required by DWAF); ridges; cultural and historical features; areas with indigenous vegetation including protected plant species (even if it is degraded or invested

with alien species); 10(g) contour intervals appropriate to the scale of the development must be indicated on the plan; and 10(h) the positions from where photographs of the site were taken must be indicated. 10(i) a detailed viewshed illustration (where appropriate) 11. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Colour photographs must include important features of the site and a description of each photograph must be provided. Photographs must be attached under Appendix B to this form. 12. ACTIVITY MOTIVATION


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 10 of 42

12(a) Socio-economic value of the activity What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? ± R200 m What is the expected yearly income that will be generated by or as a result of the activity? R n/a Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure? YES NO Is the activity a public amenity? YES NO How many new employment opportunities will be created in the development phase of the activity? ± 75 What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the development phase? R15m What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? Min 15% How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during the operational phase of the activity?

None

What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during the first 10 years? R none What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? 0 % 12(b) Need and desirability of the activity Motivate and explain the need and desirability of the activity (including demand for the activity): The Warwick Precinct is both the largest transportation node and market trading area within Durban. The Precinct is characterized by high volumes of traffic, pedestrians and commercial activity competing for limited space. The various public transport, ranks and stations, and the attractions of the commercial and education institutions, generate pedestrian traffic volumes in excess of 400 000 people daily. The above has created a situation where vehicles, pedestrians and informal traders now compete for limited space on a daily basis. This kind of pressure in the area has brought with it health and safety problems characteristic of areas experiencing intense intermingling of vehicles and people. The resulting situation can be described as follows3. From a traffic capacity perspective, The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes, result in the western gateway into and out of the city having huge congestion and delays to pedestrians and vehicles. From a safety perspective, The high levels of traffic and the lack of suitable pedestrian space as a result of trading, result in congested pedestrian walkways and overflow onto the road. This together with a lack of adequate enforcement creates an unsafe environment for residents, pedestrians and commuters and results in the Warwick Precinct consistently having one of the highest accident rates in the City, not mentioning the costs of these accidents to the Government. It is estimated that the Warwick Precinct has higher than normal pedestrian related accidents of 125 per annum, which is 2.2 times greater than the Metropolitan average. The costs of these accidents are estimated to be in the region of R18 million per annum. From a development perspective, The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes acts as a barrier to redevelopment and growth of the area. This congestion has led to the fragmentation of activities, in particular the public transport ranks.This has resulted in inefficient use of valuable land, in a prime location within the City. This inefficient use of land also inhibits the development and growth of the area. Lack of defined and dedicated trading space to cater for demand also results in trading operating at undesirable locations, exacerbating problems of congestion and urban degradation. This in turn inhibits private sector participation and investment, which in turn inhibits the possible redevelopment of the area to be able to realize its full potential, including that of tourism. Planning perspective In light of the above-described situational context of the Warwick Precinct, eThekwini Municipality have realised an urgent need to alleviate vehicular congestion in the Warwick Precinct by developing alternative routes for traffic entering the city but whose destination is not the Warwick Precinct, but rather the beach front and areas north of eThekwini. Alternative exit of the same traffic out of the city, without having to go through the Warwick Precinct is also required. The proposed outbound flyover is also a component of eThekwini Municipality’s capital projects planned to improved road infrastructure and transportation network across the city in time for the 2010 Soccer World Cup, for which eThekwini will be one of the host cities. The Warwick flyover inbound is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in November 2009, while the outbound flyover should be completed in May 2010 in time for the soccer tournament commencing in June.

3 Referenced from the Report For Committee, Warwick Junction Revitalization Program prepared by eThekwini Transport Authority / iTRUMP, 2005 (Eta 20/05 Ref No. 15/1/6/6/2/2)


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 11 of 42

Indicate any benefits that the activity will have for society in general: The proposed project is expected to have the following benefits: • The proposed project will have the immediate positive impact on the area by significantly reducing the number

of vehicles routing through the area (whose destination is not in the Warwick Junction). • The reduction of traffic through the Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection is expected to reduce the

number of accidents and potential conflicts that occur within the area, thus saving human life. While the inbound flyover currently under construction will ease congestion on Old Dutch Road/Johannes Nkosi Street/Market Road/ Centenary Road intersection.

• Reduced traffic also results in land gains, which can be utilized to enhance the pedestrian space and increase pedestrian amenity.

• The reduced traffic congestion, conflicts and land gains result in a more safe and efficient circulation of traffic, which is expected to facilitate the reorganization and rationalization of the public transport system and trading.

• It is envisaged that pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths will be improved and increased in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity.

• The proposed project is expected to facilitate closer interaction between the various land parcels and to allow an integrated development approach to the area thereby improving the overall quality of life.

• The future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) will have better access to and from the City.

Indicate any benefits that the activity will have for the local communities where the activity will be located: As above. 13. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES List all legislation, policies and/or guidelines of any sphere of government that are applicable to the application as contemplated in the EIA regulations, if applicable: Title of legislation, policy or guideline: Administering authority: Date: 1. National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 2. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of

1996 3. The National Water Act 36 of 1998 4. The National Heritage Resources Act 25 of 1999 5. Water Services Act 108 of 1997 6. Hazardous Substances Act 15 of 1973 7. Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act 25 of 1999 8. Occupational health and Safety Act 45 of 1965 9. Health Act 63 of 1997 10. Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act 43 of 1983 11. Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 12. Development Facilitation Act 67 of 1995 13. Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 14. Biodiversity Bill 15. Integrated Pollution and Waste Management Bill 16. Air Quality Bill 17. eThekwini Municipality By-laws and quality standards

DAEA The National Constitutional Court DWAF South African heritage Resource Agency DWAF Department of Health Department of Health Department of Health Department of Health Department of Agriculture Development Planning & Management Unit DEAT

1998 1996 1998 1999 1997 1973 1999 1965 1997 1983 2003


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 12 of 42

SECTION D: SITE/AREA DESCRIPTION Important note: For linear activities (pipelines etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be necessary to complete Section C for each part of the site that has a significantly different environment. In such cases please complete copies of Section C and indicate the area, which is covered by each copy No. on the Site Plan. Section C Copy No. (e.g. A): (Complete only when appropriate) 1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE Indicate the general gradient of the sites (Please cross the appropriate box). Alternative S1 (preferred site):

Flat X

1:50 – 1:20

1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5

Alternative S2 (if any): Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5

Alternative S3 (if any): Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5

2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site (Please cross the appropriate box). Alternative S1 (preferred site):

Ridgeline Plateau Side slope of hill/mountain

Closed valley

Open valley

Plain Undulating plain/low hills

Dune Sea-front

The proposed site is situated within an urban area. Approx 900m of the 1000m long road will be on air space.

Alternative S2 (if any):

Ridgeline Plateau Side slope of hill/mountain

Closed valley

Open valley


Dune Sea- front

Alternative S3 (if any): Ridgeline Plateau Side slope of

hill/mountain Closed valley

Open valley


Dune Sea-front

. 3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE Is the site(s) located on any of the following (cross the appropriate boxes)? Alternative S1

(preferred site): Alternative S2

(if any): Alternative S3

(if any): Shallow water table (less than 1.5m deep)

YES X

NO YES NO YES NO

Dolomite, sinkhole or doline areas

YES NO

X

YES NO YES NO

Seasonally wet soils (often close to water bodies)

YES X

NO YES NO YES NO Unstable rocky slopes or steep slopes with loose soil

YES NO X

YES NO YES NO Dispersive soils (soils that dissolve in water)

YES NO X

YES NO YES NO Soils with high clay content (clay fraction more than 40%)

YES NO X

YES NO YES NO Any other unstable soil or geological feature

YES NO X

YES NO YES NO An area sensitive to erosion

YES NO X

YES NO YES NO


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 13 of 42

If you are unsure about any of the above or if you are concerned that any of the above aspects may be an issue of concern in the application, an appropriate specialist should be appointed to assist in the completion of this section. (Information in respect of the above will often be available as part of the project information or at the planning sections of local authorities. Where available / they exist, the 1:50 000 scale Regional Geotechnical Maps prepared by the Council for Geo Science may also be consulted). Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO If YES, please complete: Name of the specialist: Dr T E Francis Qualification(s) of the specialist: PHD in Engineering Geology (Univ. of Natal), Registered professional Scientist Postal address: P O Box 680 Durban Postal code: 4000 Telephone: 031 311 7637 Cell: E-mail: Fax: Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: 4. GROUNDCOVER Cross the types of groundcover present on the site. Alternative S1:

Natural veld - good conditionE

Natural veld with scattered aliensE

Natural veld with heavy alien infestationE

Veld dominated by alien speciesE Gardens

Sport field Cultivated land Paved surface

Building or other structure

(railway lines and air space)

Bare soil

If any of the boxes marked with an “E “are crossed, please consult an appropriate specialist to assist in the completion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn’t have the necessary expertise. The environmental assessment practitioner or specialist must provide reasons for their selection above in the following box:

Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Are there any rare or endangered flora or fauna species (including red data species) present on any of the alternative sites?

YES NO

If YES, specify and explain:

Are their any special or sensitive habitats or other natural features present on any of the alternative sites?

YES NO


Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: The location of all identified rare or endangered species or other elements should be accurately indicated on the site plan(s). Alternative S2:





Sport field Cultivated land Paved surface Building or other structure Bare soil

If any of the boxes marked with an “E “are crossed, please consult an appropriate specialist to assist in the completion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn’t have the necessary expertise. The


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 14 of 42

environmental assessment practitioner or specialist must provide reasons for their selection above in the following box: Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Are there any rare or endangered flora or fauna species (including red data species) present on any of the alternative sites?

YES NO



YES NO


Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: The location of all identified rare or endangered species or other elements should be accurately indicated on the site plan(s). Alternative S3:





Sport field Cultivated land Paved surface Building or other structure Bare soil

If any of the boxes marked with an “E “are crossed, please consult an appropriate specialist to assist in the completion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn’t have the necessary expertise. The environmental assessment practitioner or specialist must provide reasons for their selection above in the following box: Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Are there any rare or endangered flora or fauna species (including red data species) present on any of the alternative sites?

YES NO



YES NO


Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: The location of all identified rare or endangered species or other elements should be accurately indicated on the site plan(s).


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 15 of 42

5. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA Cross the land uses and/or prominent features that currently occur within a 500m radius of the site Alternative S1 (preferred site):

Natural area Low density residential

Medium density residential

High density residential

Informal residentialA

Retail Commercial & warehousing Light industrial Medium industrialAN Heavy

industrialAN

Power stationA Office/consulting room

Military or police base/station/compound

Casino/entertainment complex Hospitality facility

Open cast mine Underground mine Spoil heap or slimes damA

Quarry, sand or borrow pit Dam or reservoir

Hospital/medical center/clinic School/creche Tertiary education

facility Church Old age home

Sewage treatment plantA

Train station or shunting yardN Railway lineN Major road (4 lanes

or more)N AirportN

Harbour Sport facilities Golf course Polo fields Filling stationH

Landfill or waste treatment siteA Plantation Agriculture River, stream or

wetland

Nature conservation

area Mountain, koppie or

ridge Museum Historical building Graveyard Archeological site

Other land uses (describe): Public and private transport depots

If any of the boxes marked with an “N “are crossed, please consult an appropriate noise specialist to assist in the completion of this section. Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO The proposed project involves the construction of a flyover within an already built up area. The proposed development will not be impacted upon by noise from the adjacent rail or road infrastructure. If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Will the ambient noise level have a negative impact on the proposed activity? YES NO If YES, specify and explain:

Are any further specialist or studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: If any of the boxes marked with an “A“ are crossed, please consult an appropriate air quality specialist to assist in the completion of this section. Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Will the ambient air pollution level have a negative impact on the proposed activity? YES NO If YES, specify and explain:

Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: If any of the boxes marked with an “H“ are crossed, please consult an appropriate health assessment specialist to assist in the completion of this section. Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 16 of 42

The proposed project involves the construction of a flyover within an already built up area. The proposed development will not be impacted upon by the existing service station. If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Will the surrounding land use pose any unacceptable health risk on the proposed activity? YES NO If YES, specify and explain:

Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? Signature of specialist: Date: Alternative S2 (if any):






industrialAN










or more)N AirportN



wetland

Nature conservation



Other land uses (describe):

If any of the boxes marked with an “N “are crossed, please consult an appropriate noise specialist to assist in the completion of this section. Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Will the ambient noise level have a negative impact on the proposed activity? YES NO If YES, specify and explain:

Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: If any of the boxes marked with an “A“ are crossed, please consult an appropriate air quality specialist to assist in the completion of this section. Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax:


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 17 of 42

Will the ambient air pollution level have a negative impact on the proposed activity? YES NO If YES, specify and explain:

Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: If any of the boxes marked with an “H“ are crossed, please consult an appropriate health assessment specialist to assist in the completion of this section. Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Will the surrounding land use pose any unacceptable health risk on the proposed activity? YES NO If YES, specify and explain:

Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: Alternative S3 (if any):






industrialAN










or more)N AirportN



wetland

Nature conservation



Other land uses (describe):


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 18 of 42

If any of the boxes marked with an “N “are crossed, please consult an appropriate noise specialist to assist in the completion of this section. Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Will the ambient noise level have a negative impact on the proposed activity? YES NO If YES, specify and explain:

Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: If any of the boxes marked with an “A“ are crossed, please consult an appropriate air quality specialist to assist in the completion of this section. Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Will the ambient air pollution level have a negative impact on the proposed activity? YES NO If YES, specify and explain:

Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? YES NO Signature of specialist: Date: If any of the boxes marked with an “H“ are crossed, please consult an appropriate health assessment specialist to assist in the completion of this section. Has a specialist been consulted? YES NO If YES, please complete the following: Name of the specialist: Qualification(s) of the specialist: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Will the surrounding land use pose any unacceptable health risk on the proposed activity? YES NO If YES, specify and explain:

Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify: If YES, is such a report(s) attached? Signature of specialist: Date:


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 19 of 42

6. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES Alternative S1 (preferred site)

Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, as defined in section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (Act No. 25 of 1999), including

YES NO

archaeological or palaeontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the site? Uncertain If YES, explain: The proposed site is located within a built up urban area. Many of the buildings within the

Warwick Precinct are listed on the Heritage register. The proposed project is part of a broader plan for the area to rationalise the use of the Warwick Precinct and ensure that the area can be utilised in a more efficient way. This will include ensuring that the cultural potential of buildings within the area are utilised more effectively and realised. Details of the proposed project have been forwarded to AMAFA KwaZulu Natali and their response is awaited.

If uncertain, conduct a specialist investigation by a recognised specialist in the field to establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site. Briefly explain the findings of the specialist:

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?

YES NO

If yes, please submit or, make sure that the applicant or a specialist submits the necessary application to SAHRA or the relevant provincial heritage agency and attach proof thereof to this application if such application has been made.

Alternative S2 (if any)


YES NO

archaeological or palaeontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the site? Uncertain If YES, explain: If uncertain, conduct a specialist investigation by a recognised specialist in the field to establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site. Briefly explain the findings of the specialist:

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?

YES NO


Alternative S3 (if any)


YES NO

archaeological or palaeontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the site? Uncertain If YES, explain: If uncertain, conduct a specialist investigation by a recognised specialist in the field to establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site. Briefly explain the findings of the specialist:

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way?

YES NO

Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?

YES NO


Are any further specialist studies recommended by the specialist? YES NO If YES, specify:

If YES, is such a report(s) attached? Signature of specialist: Date:


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 20 of 42

SECTION E: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Please note that details of all components of this section have been included under Appendix E to this report. 1. ADVERTISEMENT The environmental assessment practitioner must follow any relevant guidelines adopted by the competent authority in respect of public participation and must at least – 1(a) Fix a notice in a conspicuous place, on the property where it is intended to undertake the activity which states

that an application will be submitted to the competent authority in terms of these regulations and which provides information on the proposed nature and location of the activity, where further information on the proposed activity can be obtained and the manner in which representations on the application may be made.

1(b) inform landowners and occupiers of adjacent land of the applicant’s intention to submit an application to the competent authority

1(c) inform landowners and occupiers of land within 100 metres of the boundary of the property where it is proposed to undertake the activity and whom may be directly affected by the proposed activity of the applicant’s intention to submit an application to the competent authority;

1(d) inform the ward councillor and any organisation that represents the community in the area of the applicant’s intention to submit an application to the competent authority;

1(e) inform the municipality which has jurisdiction over the area in which the proposed activity will be undertaken of the applicant’s intention to submit an application to the competent authority; and

1(f) inform any organ of state that may have jurisdiction over any aspect of the activity of the applicant’s intention to submit an application to the competent authority; and

1(g) place a notice in one local newspaper and any Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providing notice to the public of applications made in terms of these regulations.

SEE APPENDIX E1 2. CONTENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES Advertisements and notices must indicate that an application will be submitted to the competent authority in terms of the EIA regulations, the nature and location of the activity, where further information on the proposed activity can be obtained and the manner in which representations in respect of the application can be made; SEE APPENDIX E1: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REPORT 3. PLACEMENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES Where the proposed activity may have impacts that extend beyond the municipal area where it is located, a notice must be placed in at least one provincial newspaper or national newspaper, indicating that an application will be submitted to the competent authority in terms of these regulations, the nature and location of the activity, where further information on the proposed activity can be obtained and the manner in which representations in respect of the application can be made, unless a notice has been placed in any Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providing notice to the public of applications made in terms of the EIA regulations. Advertisements and notices must make provision for site alternatives where appropriate. SEE APPENDIX E1: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REPORT 4. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES The practitioner must ensure that the public participation is adequate and must determine whether a public meeting or any other additional measure is appropriate or not based on the particular nature of each case. Special attention should be given to the involvement of local community structures such as Ward Committees, ratepayers associations and traditional authorities where appropriate. Please note that public concerns that emerge at a later stage that should have been addressed may cause the competent authority to withdraw any authorisation it may have issued if it becomes apparent that the public participation process was inadequate. A public meeting was held on the 20th August 2007. Refer to Appendix E2 for minutes of the meeting. 5. COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT The practitioner must record all comments and respond to each comment of the public before the application is submitted. The comments and responses must be captured in a comments and response report as prescribed in the EIA regulations and be attached to this application. The comments and response report must be attached under Appendix E. REFER TO APPENDIX E2: COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 21 of 42

6. PARTICIPATION BY DISTRICT, LOCAL AND TRADITIONAL AUTHORITIES

District, local and traditional authorities (where applicable) are all key interested and affected parties in each application and no decision on any application will be made before the relevant local authority is provided with the opportunity to give input. The planning and the environmental sections of the local authority must be informed of the application at least 30 (thirty) calendar days before the submission of the application. Has any comment been received from the district municipality? YES NO If “YES”, briefly describe the feedback below (also attach any correspondence to and from this authority with regard to this application): Has any comment been received from the local municipality? YES NO If “YES”, briefly describe the feedback below (also attach any correspondence to and from this authority with regard to this application): Comments from the Local Municipality are awaited. Seven copies of the draft Basic Assessment Report has been submitted for the line Departments. Any concerns received on the basic assessment report will be addressed and written responses will be submitted to the Municipality prior to submission of the final report to the DAEA. Has any comment been received from a traditional authority? YES NO If “YES”, briefly describe the feedback below (also attach any correspondence to and from this authority with regard to this application): 7. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Any stakeholder that has a direct interest in the site or property, such as servitude holders and service providers, should be informed of the application at least 30 (thirty) calendar days before the submission of the application and be provided with the opportunity to comment. Has any comment been received from stakeholders? YES NO If “YES”, briefly describe the feedback below (also attach copies of any correspondence to and from the stakeholders to this application): 1. SARCC Metrorial registered as I&AP’s and attended the public meeting. They raised a concern about the effect

of the proposed development on their railway and the Berea Road Station. 2. Remant Alton and Makabongwe Methodist Pre-school inquired about whether their properties would be

affected. 3. eKZNWildlife indicated that no biodiversity concerns have been identified. 4. Councillor Avrille Coen registered as an I&AP. 5. AMAFA requested additional information with regard to site locality to enable them to comment. 6. DWAF outlined issues that need to be addressed in the Basic Assessment Report namely;

Management of solid waste and hazardous waste Storm water management plan. Environmental management plan Identification of environmentally sensitive areas that could be impacted upon by the development

Refer Comments and Response Report attached as Appendix E2: Comments and Response Report for further detail. Copies of correspondence attached in Appendix E2.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 22 of 42

SECTION F: IMPACT ASSESSMENT The assessment of impacts must adhere to the minimum requirements in the EIA Regulations, 2006, and should take applicable official guidelines into account. The issues raised by interested and affected parties should also be addressed in the assessment of impacts. Please note that details of all components of this section must be included under Appendix F to this report. 1. ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES List the issues raised by interested and affected parties. 1. Relocation of some informal traders working in the taxi rank and the bus rank that falls within the footprint of the

proposed development. 2. Impact of the proposed development on surrounding businesses, and residents. 3. Impact of surrounding infrastructure and buildings including SEDA eThekwini building. Request that details of

the construction period and program be communicated to directly affected land users. 4. Design of elevated flyover outbound and footprint. 5. Request that informal traders be informed of progress and be included in all phases of the application process. 6. Impact of the proposed development on Russell Street access. Response from the practitioner to the issues raised by the interested and affected parties (A full response must be given in the Comments and Response Report that must be attached to this report): Refer Comments and Response Report attached as Appendix E Public Participation Concerns listed above have been looked at in more detail in the impact assessment phase. 2. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE

a. Site alternatives List the potential impacts associated with site alternatives that are likely to occur during the planning and design phase: Alternative S1 (preferred alternative) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative S2 (if any) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative S3 (if any) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: No-go alternative (compulsory) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts:


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 23 of 42

Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above: Alternative S1 Alternative S2 Alternative S3

b. Process, technology, layout or other alternatives List the impacts associated with any process, technology, layout or other alternatives that are likely to occur during the planning and design phase (please list impacts associated with each alternative separately): Alternative A1 (preferred alternative) Direct impacts: Planning Frameworks for Warwick Precinct and the greater Durban CBD by eThekwini Municipality used in this assessment are as follows: Inner-city’s Urban Development Zone Warwick Junction Precinct Plan Warwick Junction and Warwick Revitalization Programme

Planning Initiatives for Warwick Precinct have been identified as: Create a predominantly pedestrian preference corridor in the precinct Rationalise, consolidate and organise the public transport movements into a single integrated complex. Consolidate and develop existing available land for heritage/social/commercial and residential activities Connect the precinct to the city via non motorized transport (NMT) ways and via the CBD Public Transport

Circulatory Systems. The eThekwini Transport Authority's Vision is aligned to that of the National Department of Transport, which is to: Provide safe, reliable, effective, efficient and fully integrated transport operations and infrastructure which would

best meet the needs of freight and passenger customers at improving levels of service and cost in a fashion which supports government strategies for economic and social development, whilst being environmentally and economically sustainable.

This Vision is aligned to the national vision on land passenger transport, to “promote a safe, reliable, effective, efficient, coordinated, integrated, and environmentally friendly land passenger

transport system in South African urban and rural areas, and the southern African Region, managed in an accountable manner to ensure that people experience improving levels of mobility and accessibility”.

It is also aligned to the eThekwini IDP Vision which states that: By 2020 eThekwini Municipality will enjoy the reputation of being Africa’s most caring and livable city, where all

citizens live in harmony. This Vision will be achieved by growing its economy and meeting peoples’ needs so that all citizens enjoy a high quality of life with equal opportunities, in a city that they are truly proud of.

The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes is a problem facing the Warwick Precinct and needs t be addressed.

High vehicular and pedestrian volumes in the precinct results in an unsafe environment for residents, pedestrians and commuters and results in the Alice/Market/Leopold/Warwick quadrant consistently having one of the highest accident rates in the City.

The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes acts as a barrier to redevelopment and growth of the area.

Indirect & Cumulative impacts: The Rationalisation and Reorganisation of Public Transport and Trade The Rationalisation and Revitalisation of Land Uses

Road Infrastructure Development for 2010 World cup The objective of the inbound and outbound flyovers is to have through traffic in and out of the city to by-pass the precinct, provide efficiency in terms of travel time, safety, ease congestion and improve amenity of Warwick Precinct, for the 2010 World Cup.

Alternative A2 (if any) Direct impacts:


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 24 of 42

Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative A3 (if any) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: No-go alternative (compulsory) Land Use The Warwick Precinct would remain fragmented with high volumes of traffic, pedestrians and commercial activity

competing for limited space. The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes will continue to act as a barrier

to redevelopment and growth of the area. The fragmentation of activities, in particular the public transport ranks, will remain inefficient, inconvenient and

unsafe. Lack of defined and dedicated trading space to cater for demand will continue to result in trading operating at

undesirable locations, exacerbating problems of congestion and urban degradation. Traffic The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes, will continue to result in the

western gateway of the City having considerable congestion and delays to pedestrians and vehicles. The high risk of accidents to traffic users and pedestrians will remain.

Land Use Private sector participation and investment will continue to be inhibited, which in turn inhibits the possible

redevelopment of the area to be able to realize its full potential, including that of tourism. Traffic Access to future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) to and from the City will continue to

be a problem. Health & Safety The high levels of traffic and the lack of suitable pedestrian space as a result of trading, will continue to result in

congested pedestrian walkways and overflow onto the road. This together with a lack of adequate enforcement will continue to create an unsafe environment for residents,

pedestrians and commuters that result in the Alice/Market/Leopold/Warwick quadrant consistently having one of the highest accident rates in the City. The costs of these accidents are estimated to be in the region of R18 million per annum

Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place Aesthetics, landscape character and Sense of Place is likely to deteriorate as more land uses compete for limited

space, leading to visual degradation in terms of congestion, litter, and lack of pedestrian space. Cumulative impacts: Land Use The Warwick flyover inbound although critical, on its own would serve limited purpose in addressing the issues of

vehicular congestion in the Warwick Precinct and the associated problems. Positive cumulative impacts of the two flyovers in operation as outlined throughout the report will not realised.

The area serves as a gateway of the City, and currently detracts from the many positives that the real City has to offer. This will impact on the growing number of national and international events being staged in the city not least of which the much anticipated 2010 World Cup, and the broader long term tourism perspective.

Traffic The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes, will continue to result in the

western gateway into the City having considerable congestion and delays to pedestrians and vehicles


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 25 of 42

Access to future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) to and from the City will continue to be a problem.

Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above: Alternative A1: Alternative A2: Alternative A3: The proposed project will link Leopold Street to the Western Freeway,

thus by-passing the highly congested Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersections on the outbound carriageway and thereby improving traffic flow through the Warwick Precinct.

Construction of the Warwick Flyover inbound is underway, with completion expected in November 2009.

CONSTRICTION PERIOD FOR THE OUTBOUND FLYOVER IN TIME FOR THE 2010 WORLD CUP IS CRITICAL.

The inbound flyover will serve as a link between the Western Freeway and Johannes Nkosi Street, also by-passing the Warwick Precinct. These two projects will allow for the planning initiatives of the Warwick Precinct to be realised.

The proposed project is part of a broader plan for the area to rationalise the use of the Warwick Precinct and ensure that the area can be utilised in a more efficient way.

In conjunction with the inbound flyover currently under construction; The proposed outbound flyover will significantly reduce the number of

vehicles routing through the area. The reduction of traffic is expected to reduce the number of accidents

and potential conflicts that occur within the area, thus saving human life, as well as the economy of the region.

Reduced traffic also results in land gains, which can be utilized to enhance the pedestrian space and increase pedestrian amenity.

It is envisaged that pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths will be improved and increased in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity within the Precinct.

The reduced traffic congestion, conflicts and land gains will result in a more safe and efficient circulation of traffic, which is expected to facilitate the reorganization and rationalization of the public transport system and trading.

Environmental authorization if granted should set a specific requirement of an environmental management plan for both the construction and the operational phases to ensure proposed mitigation measures are complied with.

3. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE

a. Site alternatives List the potential impacts associated with site alternatives that are likely to occur during the construction phase: Alternative S1 (preferred site) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative S2 (if any) Direct impacts:


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 26 of 42

Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative S3 (if any) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: No-go alternative (compulsory) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above: Alternative S1 Alternative S2 Alternative S3

b. Process, technology, layout or other alternatives List the impacts associated with process, technology, layout or other alternatives that are likely to occur during the construction phase (please list impacts associated with each alternative separately): Alternative A1 (preferred alternative) Direct impacts: Biophysical Fugitive dust can impact on roadside air quality during construction. Exhaust fumes from construction machinery,

and potential smoke from cooking fires. Burning of waste and cleared vegetation. During excavations for installation of piles, strong water flows into open excavations below the water table may

occur, causing sidewall collapse. Contamination from spillage of petroleum products, spent engine oil and oil leaks from construction vehicle

maintenance taking place on site. Contamination through use of toilet ‘facilities’ other than provided facilities. The proposed construction of the flyover will affect existing roadside trees between the Western Freeway

outbound and inbound carriageways.. Land uses Demolishing or temporary closure of a building utilised by SEDA eThekwini. At least sections of the bus rank located on the north-eastern quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway

intersection, and a taxi rank located on the north-western quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection, will need to be temporarily closed as it falls within the construction footprint of the proposed outbound flyover.

Informal traders in located trading inside the taxi rank and the bus rank above-mentioned will also be affected. Infrastructure and Services There is likely to be temporary disruption of infrastructure and services during the construction of the proposed

Flyover, these will include electricity pylons, telecommunications, and underground pipes Location of piles is the only aspect of the development that may affect underground services. Metrorail will not be affected by the proposed project, as the flyover terminates just before Russell Street, while

the railway lines are located further north-east. Traffic It is not envisaged that Leopold Street and other roads in the vicinity will be closed during the construction of the

outbound flyover. There will be reduction in the number of operating lanes on Leopold Street. This may result in traffic backing up

especially during peak hours.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 27 of 42

Access on Russell Street will also be affected. This access road to Johannes Nkosi Street may need to be closed while construction in the vicinity is underway, it shall however not remain closed for the duration of the entire construction period.

Limited impacts on pedestrians are expected, as Leopold Street and the N3 freeway are generally free of pedestrians and taxi stops.

Residents and business located south of the road have access via a separation off-ramp. This access will not be affected by construction activities.

Health & Safety Construction activities are by their very nature dangerous. Danger of construction related injuries.

Noise and Vibrations Use of heavy vehicles and equipment may generate high levels of noise for the duration of the construction

period. Vibrations resulting from bulk earthworks and compaction of base layers may create significant disturbances to

nearby people and businesses along Leopold Street. Disturbance from after hours work.

Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place The presence of heavy duty vehicles and equipment, temporary structures at construction camps, stockpiles,

asphalt may result in impacts on aesthetics and landscape character. Indiscriminate disposal of rubbish, construction waste and rubble, excavated material and off cuts could increase

negative visual impact. Increase in littering on site from labour force and construction activities.

Workers Conduct Construction workers on site disrupting adjacent land uses by creating noise, generating litter, & possible

loitering. Employment Generation The development will provide employment opportunities for local people during construction. Labour gathering at the site for work could be a safety and security issue, and should be avoided.

Indirect impacts: Biophysical The nature and intensity of rainfall events in an area, has implications for storm water management and

programme/timeframes for construction. Smoke from burning activities could be wider spread on windy days especially when dust could be blown off site. The water table is very shallow and tends to be perched on clay layers that may also cause artesian conditions in

Warwick Avenue. Settlement of fills on the estuarine sediments may occur, with its rate and amount being governed by the

presence, thickness and compressibility of clay layers. General and hazardous waste production Construction activities will result in production of general waste and hazardous waste in the form of cement bags,

fuel/oil containers etc. The storage, transportation and disposal of these waste is important waste. Land uses Overall disruptions to local businesses, transport services, due to traffic and construction related noise, visual,

and air pollution along Leopold Street. Traffic Increased volume of construction vehicles on the roads may lead to increased wear and tear of roads in the

vicinity of the proposed site. Increased volume of construction vehicles on the roads may lead to increased wear and tear of roads in the

vicinity of the proposed site. Health & Safety Open fires in construction camp could result in accidents.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 28 of 42

Safety of workers and general public must be ensured. Poor waste management practices and unhygienic conditions at temporary ablution facilities could cause breed

diseases. Standing water due to inadequate storm water drainage systems, inadequate waste management practices, pose

a health hazard to providing breeding grounds for disease vectors such as mosquitoes, flies and snails. The use of hazardous chemicals in the construction of a road can pose potential environmental, health and safety

risks. Road safety may be affected during construction, with the reduction in the number of operational lanes; however

the impact is expected to be minimal due to the minimal presence of pedestrians. Employment Generation Expectations regarding new employment would be high especially among the unemployed individuals in the area.

Cumulative impacts: Traffic Increase in traffic and congestion along other routes.

Employment Generation The training of unskilled or previously unemployed persons will add to the skills base of the area.

Cultural Heritage The proposed project is part of a broader plan for the area to rationalise the use of the Warwick Precinct and

ensure that the area can be utilised in a more efficient way. This will include ensuring that the cultural potential of buildings within the area are utilised more effectively and realised.

Alternative A2 Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative A3 Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: No-go alternative (compulsory) Direct impacts: Traffic The high risk of accidents to traffic users and pedestrians will remain.

Noise Pollution Noise pollution would remain the same. No impacts on sensitive receptors during construction

Employment No provision of jobs

Indirect impacts: Biophysical Air quality would remain the same. No impacts on sensitive receptors during construction

Land Use Normal operations of the bus rank located on the north-eastern quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway

intersection, and a taxi rank located on the north-western quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection, will continue.

Informal traders in located trading inside the taxi rank and the bus rank above-mentioned will also continue to


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 29 of 42

operate as normal. Traffic The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes, will continue to result in the

western gateway into the City having considerable congestion and delays to pedestrians and vehicles Access to future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) to and from the City will continue to

be a problem. Access to future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) to and from the City will continue to

be a problem. Health & Safety The high levels of traffic and the lack of suitable pedestrian space as a result of trading, will continue to result in

congested pedestrian walkways and overflow onto the road. Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place Aesthetics, landscape character and Sense of Place is likely to deteriorate as more land uses compete for limited

space, leading to visual degradation in terms of congestion, litter, and lack of pedestrian space. Cumulative impacts: No training of unskilled or previously unemployed persons that will add to the skills base of the area. The continuing of Extraneous Traffic and decreasing Pedestrian Amenity Public Transport and Trade will continue to be not clearly defined. Land Uses will continue to be unplanned and appropriately catered for. No clear linkages to the City.

Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above: Alternative A1: Alternative A2: Alternative A3: Climate Seasonal climatic variations should be considered during scheduling of

construction activities in the area Excavations and other clearing activities should only be done during

agreed working times and permitted weather conditions. It is envisaged that runoff from the construction site will be directed into

the existing Municipal drainage system. Mitigation measured for pollution of runoff shall be addressed in the EMP.

The proposed flyover should be designed to minimise incidents of road surface flooding and improve road surface storm water drainage.

No open fires permitted on site

Air Quality Ensure compliance with the Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act and

the Air Quality Bill. Ensure compliance with emission standards applicable to the area

through which the road is aligned. Guidelines that deal with the control of air pollution on site should be

outlined in the Environmental Management Plan. Monitoring of air pollution levels in potential problem areas should be

undertaken. Management (including storage, transport, handling and disposal) of

hazardous substances used during construction. Dust control measure should be included in the EMP for construction

phase. Dust generating construction activities should be avoided during strong

winds. Soil loads in transit should be kept covered A suitable dust palliative should be applied if dust levels rise above

acceptable levels, either water or commercial dust suppressants Regular servicing vehicles off site in order to limit gaseous emissions. No open fires permitted on site Chemical toilets should be place on site and must be maintained on a

daily basis.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 30 of 42

Geology The design of the site drainage system should be adequate to control

runoff from the development site in line with topographical features of the site.

Piled foundations relying on end bearing on bedrock will be necessary. Rock shoes would be required to penetrate any boulders and key into a

sloping or weathered, broken rock surface. The alternative of bored piles socketed into bedrock would also be suitable.

Rehabilitate all sites during construction including construction camps, stockpile area, temporary access and hauling routes, as soon as possible after the disturbance has ceased.

Contractor to exercise strict care in the disposal of construction waste, with proof of disposal at an approved site provided after offloading each waste load and this logged/registered.

Contaminated water must be contained & disposed off site at an approved landfill.

A suitable waste-handling contractor should dispose of waste from the oil interceptors and provide Safe Disposal Certificates.

Cement, concrete and chemicals should be mixed on a concrete plinth and provisions should be made to contain spillages or overflows into the soil.

No vehicle maintenance to be allowed on site. If oil spills occur the contaminated soil should be disposed of at an

approved landfill site. Chemical toilets should be placed on site and maintained on a daily

basis. Subsoil and overburden in all construction and lay down areas to be

stockpiled separately and returned for backfilling in the correct soil horizon order.

Drainage and Hydrology Ensure compliance with applicable legislation, such as the National

Water Act, Water Services Act, Hazardous Substances Act, and Integrated Pollution and Waste Management Bill.

Storm water drainage systems must be able to control the volume, speed and location of runoff expected.

It is envisaged that runoff from the construction site will be directed into the existing Municipal drainage system. Mitigation measured for pollution of runoff should be addressed in the EMP.

The site surface must be engineered and shaped in such a way that rapid and efficient evacuation of runoff is achieved.

Improve existing alignments and drainage systems. Provide containment areas for potential pollutants at construction camps,

refuelling depots, asphalt plants and concrete batching plants. Appropriate waste management practices should be implemented during

construction. The transport, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous substances

must be adequately controlled and managed.

Biodiversity Fauna & Flora The Department should work closely in conjunction with Parks and

Gardens / Architecture with regards landscaping, tree planting, grassing etc.

Relocation of palm trees and important floral specimens, shall be relocated in consultation with the Parks Department.

Waste Management Ensure compliance with the Health Act and Occupational Health and

Safety Act. Solid waste disposal and waste management will need to be

implemented once the proposed development has been established.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 31 of 42

Implement good housekeeping practices at the construction camp. Provide waste disposal facilities and enforce anti-littering campaigns. Monitor housekeeping, littering and illegal dumping. Refuse areas should be adequately located to allow easy access.

Durban Solid Waste will need easy access to the refuse area. DWAF have indicated the importance of proper solid water management

of development. A copy of the EMP outlining measures to be taken shall be submitted to DWAF for approval.

Removal and disposal of solid waste to a permitted disposal site is required and is this is the responsibility of the Local Municipality

Burning of waste will not be permitted on site Contaminated materials are to be disposed of at a permitted hazardous

landfill site. Should the use of a private contractor be an option, the details of the

contractor and safe disposal certificates must be retained All solid waste being collected must be stored under cover in a

designated storage area. Recycling is highly encouraged provided that such an activity does not

lead to secondary pollution. Temporary storage of waste and handling thereof waste should avoid

pollution of surface and ground water or a health hazard. Social Impacts Land uses The eThekwini Roads Provision Department need to consult with various

organisations, departments, etc within the area. The following affected land users need to be consulted; − Informal Trade Department. − SEDA eThekwini − Public transport operators and affected the affected taxi rank and

bus rank. Provide clear and realistic information regarding employment

opportunities and other benefits for local communities in order to prevent unrealistic expectations.

The eThekwini Roads Provision Department are in consultations internally with the Informal Trade Department regarding informal traders. Affected street traders will need to be notified in writing about the above development.

Proof of consultation with the mentioned parties should be appended the Final EMP to be submitted to the DAEA for approval prior to commencement of construction.

Make use of local labour, materials, goods and services as far as possible.

Infrastructure and Services Minimise alignments that would interfere with existing and potential future

infrastructure and services. Keep construction related disturbances to a minimum. Consult with affected service providers regarding impacts on access to

infrastructure and services and alternatives. Consult with affected communities or businesses prior to foreseeable

disruptions, for example notifying residents of a temporary severance of water supply.

Provide access points to infrastructure and services. Provide conduits / ducts / culverts for other infrastructure and services. Monitor complaints by the public. The EMP should include a complaints register.

Traffic No traffic detours and total closure of roads are envisaged are

envisaged.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 32 of 42

The Traffic Department will need to finalize the lane markings and the final traffic layout will need to be appended to the final EMP.

Adopt alignments that minimise disruption of land uses and fragmentation of interdependent land uses.

Provide slow lanes, paved shoulders and safe crossings where necessary.

Should closure of any roads become necessary at any point during construction, the public must be notified at least 14days before closure.

Provide clear and realistic information regarding alternative accesses for local communities and businesses in order to prevent unrealistic expectations.

Consult with local communities regarding location of construction camps, access and hauling routes, and other likely disturbances during construction.

Adequate warning signs of hazardous working areas. Construction programme should be appended to the Final EMP to be

submitted to the DAEA for approval prior to commencement of construction..

Health & Safety Ensure compliance with the Health Act and Occupational Health and

Safety Act. Implement good housekeeping practices at the construction camp. Strict health & safety measures to be implemented and audited on a

regular basis. Secure enclosed construction site. Use of reputable Contractors. Adequate warning signs of hazardous working areas. Excavations to be clearly demarcated and barriers (not just danger tape)

erected to protect pedestrians from open trenches. Workers should be thoroughly trained in using dangerous equipment. Workers have the right to refuse work in unsafe conditions. Undertake appropriate waste management practises. Control speed and movement of construction vehicles Undertake appropriate waste management practices.

Noise & Vibrations Ensure compliance with applicable SABS noise standards. Management of construction activities should be clearly outlined in the

environmental management plan to help reduce/mitigate or avoid noise impacts

Locate concrete batching, asphalt, and crushing plants, laydown areas and construction camps away from sensitive receptors.

Restrict construction activities to reasonable working hours where near sensitive receptors.

Keep adjacent landowners informed of unusually noisy activities planned. Ensure that machinery in a good state of maintenance. Silencers must be fitted and maintained to all machinery on site. Monitor noise levels in potential problem areas..

Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place Storage areas should be properly fenced off. All domestic solid waste should be collected from a central point of

disposal and fed into the municipal waste collection system. Contractor to exercise strict care in the disposing of construction waste,

with proof of disposal at a proper site provided after offloading each waste load and this logged/registered.

Identification of suitable waste disposal site with enough capacity to hold additional waste to be produced by the proposed road construction activities.

Use of recycled material is encouraged especially in the upgrading of existing road.

Guidelines regarding management of waste on site should be outlined in the environmental management plan.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 33 of 42

Retain mature trees on and around the site where possible. Cluster construction activities on site on a specific area to avoid “sprawl”. • Unwanted material and litter should be removed on a frequent basis. Workers conduct Ensure strict control of labourers, minimising working hours to normal

working times, control littering, and ensure no overnight accommodation is provided.

Employment The use of labour intensive construction measures should be used where

appropriate. Employ local (unskilled) labour if possible Training of labour to benefit individuals beyond completion of the project. Recruitment of labours should take place off-site. The contractual documentation should ensure that at least 70% of all

labour is from surrounding communities.

Archaeological and Cultural Characteristics Details of the proposed project have been forwarded to AMAFA KwaZulu

Natali, and the above comments shall be confirmed by AMAFA. In general: Ensure that construction staff members are aware of the likelihood of

heritage resources being unearthed and of the scientific importance of such discoveries.

AMAFA must be contacted should any graves be discovered in the course of development activities and all development should cease until further notice.

AMAFA must be contacted should any heritage resources or objects, defined in the Act, be discovered in the course of development activities and all development should cease until further notice.

Any heritage objects found are not to be moved without prior consultation with AMAFA and all construction work should cease immediately.

No structures older than sixty years are allowed to be demolished, altered or destructed without a permit from AMAFA.

No activities are allowed within 50 metres of a site which contain Rock Art.

4. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE OPERATIONAL PHASE

c. Site alternatives List the potential impacts associated with site alternatives that are likely to occur during the operational phase: Alternative S1 (preferred alternative) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative S2 (if any) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative S3 (if any) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts:


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 34 of 42

Cumulative impacts: No-go alternative (compulsory) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above: Alternative S1 Alternative S2 Alternative S3

d. Process, technology, layout or other alternatives

List the impacts associated with process, technology, layout or other alternatives that are likely to occur during the operational phase (please list impacts associated with each alternative separately): Alternative A1 (preferred alternative) Direct impacts: Biophysical The corrosive nature of coastal climatic conditions may impact on road infrastructure, including road side signage

and safety barriers. Traffic The reduction of traffic through the Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection is expected to reduce the

number of accidents and potential conflicts that occur within the area, thus saving human life. Noise Pollution Noise pollution caused by existing road traffic, and additional traffic with new flyover. Expected increase in noise due to increased traffic is not expected to impact significantly on the current ambient

noise levels. Vibrations are much less likely to be a cause of disturbance than noise levels, but it may become a problem when

vehicles, especially heavy vehicles, travel over irregular road surfaces in close proximity to sensitive roadside receptors.

Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place The proposed project is considered to be compatible with the surrounding landscape and is not likely to impact

negatively on the existing visual quality or landscape character of the area; rather it is expected to improve the general environment through better use of the area.

The Flyover will increase the quality of the tourism experience being offered, by enhancing the sense of place of the project area that originally attracted tourists (it is anticipated that the project will result in improved safety and aesthetics).

Indirect impacts: Biophysical Air pollutants can be inhaled directly from the air, or ingested from touching surfaces or objects where pollutants

have settled. The impacts on air quality to sensitive receptors in proximity to Alice Street (Johannes Nkosi) area may improve

as a result of the proposed project since there will be a separation of traffic through the area. Roadside soils may be affected by airborne pollutants emitted by vehicle exhausts, leaking petrochemicals during

accidents and breakdowns. Land Use In conjunction with the inbound flyover currently under construction: The proposed flyover would have positive impacts both on a local and regional context in terms of road

improvements and an improved transportation regime. Reduced traffic results in land gains, which can be utilized to enhance the pedestrian space and increase

pedestrian amenity.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 35 of 42

The proposed project is expected to facilitate closer interaction between the various land parcels and to allow an integrated development approach to the area thereby improving the overall quality of life.

The largest benefits will be to individuals living or working within the area. The proposed development is expected to bring about positive economic benefits in the medium to long term. Local road side businesses, public transport, education and health facilities, etc are likely to benefit from the

proposed project. It is envisaged that as a result of this project, pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths will be improved and increased

in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity. This will improve the safety of pedestrians while making markets more accessible.

Access into and through the area (to destinations closer to the coast or further inland) will be improved. The future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) will have better access to and from the

City. The proposed development is likely to impact positively on commercial activities within the project area and

surrounds through improved access and rationalisation of the area available for commercial activities. Traffic In conjunction with the inbound flyover currently under construction: Significant reduction in the number of vehicles routing through the area, whose destination is not in the Warwick

Junction. The reduction of traffic through the quadrant of Market/Leopold/Warwick and Johannes Nkosi Street is expected

to reduce the number of accidents and potential conflicts that occur within the area, thus saving human life. Reduced traffic also results in land gains, which can be utilized to enhance the pedestrian space and increase

pedestrian amenity. The reduced traffic congestion, conflicts and land gains result in a more safe and efficient circulation of traffic,

which is expected to facilitate the reorganization and rationalization of the public transport system and trading. The future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) will have better access to and from the

City. Construction of the inbound flyover will be completed in November 2009 and the date of completion for the outbound is May 2010

Health & Safety The reduction of traffic through the quadrant of Market/Leopold/Warwick and Johannes Nkosi Street is expected

to reduce the number of accidents and potential conflicts that occur within the area, thus improving public safety of road users.

It is envisaged that pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths will be improved as a result of this project and increased in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity.

The reduced traffic congestion, conflicts and land gains will result in a more safe and efficient circulation of traffic. Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place The project is expected to result in a reduction of traffic through the area and associated land gains that will allow

for the urban redesign of the appearance of the area to create a high quality environment for people. This will enhance the existing trading, transport and residential infrastructure and associated facilities as well as encouraging commercial, retail, residential and tourism initiatives within the area, thus providing broader impetus for the redevelopment of the surrounding area and CBD.

Cumulative impacts: Biophysical Air pollution may increase over time due to gradual increases in traffic volumes on the road.

Traffic The future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) will have better access to and from the

City. Health & Safety The reduced traffic congestion, conflicts and land gains will result in a more safe and efficient circulation of traffic

Land Use The proposed flyover would have positive impacts both on a local and regional context in terms of road

improvements and an improved transportation regime Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 36 of 42

The expected reduction of traffic through the area and associated land gains will allow for the urban redesign of the appearance of the area to create a high quality environment for people. This will in turn enhance the existing trading, transport and residential infrastructure and associated facilities as well as encouraging commercial, retail, residential and tourism initiatives within the area, thus providing broader impetus for the redevelopment of the surrounding area and CBD.

Alternative A2 Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative A3 Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: No-go alternative (compulsory) Direct impacts: Land Use The Warwick Precinct would remain fragmented with high volumes of traffic, pedestrians and commercial activity

competing for limited space. The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes will continue to act as a barrier

to redevelopment and growth of the area. The fragmentation of activities, in particular the public transport ranks, will remain inefficient, inconvenient and

unsafe. Lack of defined and dedicated trading space to cater for demand will continue to result in trading operating at

undesirable locations, exacerbating problems of congestion and urban degradation. Traffic High vehicular traffic through the Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection will continue to be a problem

in terms of safety of pedestrian vehicular accidents and the general congestion of the intersection. The high risk of accidents to traffic users and pedestrians will remain.


Indirect impacts: Biophysical Air quality would remain the same. No impacts on sensitive receptors during construction

Land Use Economic investment in the precinct will continue to be inhibited, which in turn inhibits the possible

redevelopment of the area to be able to realize its full potential, including that of tourism. The area serves as a gateway into the City, and currently detracts from the many positives that the real City has

to offer. This will impact on the growing number of national and international events being staged in the city not least of which the much anticipated 2010 World Cup, and the broader long term tourism perspective,.


western gateway into the City having considerable congestion and delays to pedestrians and vehicles Access to future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) to and from the City will continue to

be a problem. Access to future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) to and from the City will continue to

be a problem. Health & Safety


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 37 of 42

The high levels of traffic and the lack of suitable pedestrian space as a result of trading, will continue to result in congested pedestrian walkways and overflow onto the road.

This together with a lack of adequate enforcement will continue to create an unsafe environment for residents, pedestrians and commuters that result in the Alice/Market/Leopold/Warwick quadrant consistently having one of the highest accident rates in the City. The costs of these accidents are estimated to be in the region of R18 million per annum

Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place Aesthetics, landscape character and Sense of Place is likely to deteriorate as more land uses compete for limited

space, leading to visual degradation in terms of congestion, litter, and lack of pedestrian space. Cumulative impacts: Land Use The area serves as a gateway into the City, and currently detracts from the many positives that the real City has

to offer. This will impact on the growing number of national and international events being staged in the city not least of which the much anticipated 2010 World Cup, and the broader long term tourism perspective.


western gateway of the City having considerable congestion and delays to pedestrians and vehicles Access to future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) to and from the City will continue to

be a problem. Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above: Alternative A1 Alternative A2 Alternative A3 Climate Provide warning signs and suggested speed limits during dangerous

conditions. Regular road side maintenance.

Air Quality Ensure compliance with the Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act and

the Air Quality Bill. Ensure compliance with emission standards applicable to the area

through which the road is aligned. Enforce speed limits and regulate roadworthiness of vehicles during

operation of the road. Monitoring of air pollution levels in potential problem areas should be

undertaken.

Drainage & Hydrology Ensure compliance with applicable legislation, such as the National

Water Act, Water Services Act, Hazardous Substances Act, and Integrated Pollution and Waste Management Bill.

Design of site drainage system should be adequate to control runoff from development site in line with topographical features of the site.

Appropriate waste management practices should be implemented during operation of the road.

Social Aspects Land Use SPECIAL EVENTS MANAGEMENT such as extra policing and barriers

to control movement of pedestrians during peak traffic flows

Health & Safety Ensure compliance with the Health Act and Occupational Health and

Safety Act. Undertake regular road maintenance to avoid unacceptable degradation

of carriageway and road shoulder that may create dangerous road conditions.

Impose speed limits through urban areas. Provide adequate pedestrian walkways and crossings. Provide adequate roadside safety signage. Monitor road accident statistics, state of fencing and roadside vegetation


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 38 of 42

Noise Pollution Ensure compliance with applicable SABS noise standards. Encourage vehicles to travel at a constant, efficient cruising speed. Ensure appropriate road surface design and regular maintenance to

minimise frictional road noise and vibrations, especially for heavily used roads near sensitive receptors.

Regulate roadworthiness of vehicles. Monitor noise levels in potential problem areas.

Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place The proposed flyover will be similar in construction and design to existing

bridges in the area. There will be some additional urban design features (e.g. lighting, etc) to enhance the aesthetics of the structure and its placement in the area.

Signage to comply with the stipulations of the South African Manual for Outdoor Advertising Control (SAMOAC).

Implement appropriate design features to ensure visual appeal of the road and road infrastructure such as the road surface, safety barriers, lighting columns, etc.

During design, retain roadside trees wherever possible, for example by widening the road to the one side only.

Provide waste disposal facilities and enforce anti-littering campaigns. Provide assistance with cleaning and maintenance of roadside buildings

soiled or stained by air pollutants. Monitor housekeeping, littering and illegal dumping.

5. Impacts that may result from the decommissioning or closure phase

e. Site alternatives List the potential impacts associated with site alternatives that are likely to occur during the decommissioning or closure phase: Alternative S1 (preferred alternative) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative S2 Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative S3 Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: No-go alternative (compulsory) Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts:


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 39 of 42

Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above: Alternative S1 Alternative S2 Alternative S3

b. Process, technology, layout or other alternatives List the impacts associated with process, technology, layout or other alternatives that are likely to occur during the decommissioning or closure phase (please list impacts associated with each alternative separately): Alternative A1 (preferred alternative) Direct impacts: Should the removal of the road be a preferred option than the following impacts may result, Ripping of asphalt containing tar may expose fresh volatiles that may leach into soil and water. Increase in traffic and congestion along other routes. The situation will revert to the current situation.

Indirect impacts: Generation of potentially hazardous waste in the form of asphalt. General disruption to adjacent land uses due to increase in noise levels, visual pollution and disruption of

livelihoods and movement patterns Closure of road will eliminate quicker and more cost efficient access to the City and surrounds. Loss of economic benefits for people who depended on the operation of the road for jobs.

Cumulative impacts: Irreversible loss of resources utilised during road construction and operation phases.

Alternative A2 Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: Alternative A3 Direct impacts: Indirect impacts: Cumulative impacts: No-go alternative (compulsory) The positive benefits of the proposed outbound Flyover will remain Indicate mitigation measures to manage the potential impacts listed above: Alternative A1 Alternative A2 Alternative A3 Environmental management

plan Re-use the old asphalt and

concrete is encouraged instead of disposal.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 40 of 42

C. PROPOSED MONITORING AND AUDITING For each phase of the project and for each alternative, please indicate how identified impacts and mitigation will be monitored and/or audited. Alternative S1 (preferred site) Alternative S2 Alternative S3 Alternative A1 (preferred alternative)

Alternative A2 Alternative A3

• All phases of development require an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) setting out clear procedures and including all mitigation measures discussed above. The EMP must be approved by the relevant authority before construction commences.

• The Developer must appoint a qualified Environmental Impact Practitioner to carry out monthly audits during construction and submit monthly report to contractor and relevant authority.

• The relevant authority must carry out regular site audits with the ECO to ensure the monitoring and compliance requirements are met by the contractor and the developer.

D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Taking the assessment of potential impacts into account, please provide an environmental impact statement that sums up the impact that the proposed activity and its alternatives may have on the environment after the management and mitigation of impacts have been taken into account with specific reference to their type, likelihood, duration and the significance. Alternative S1 (preferred site) Alternative S2 Alternative S3 Alternative A1 (preferred alternative) The proposed activity forms part of eThekwini Municipality's two initiatives to improve transportation networks and roads across the CBD. The proposed project will link Leopold Street to the Western Freeway, thus by-passing the highly congested Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersections on the outbound carriageway and thereby improving traffic flow through the Warwick Precinct. It is a crucial component of the Municipality’s capital projects planned to improved road infrastructure and transportation network across the city in time for the 2010 Soccer World Cup. The “sister” project, Warwick flyover inbound is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in November 2009, while the outbound flyover should be completed in May 2010 in time for the soccer tournament commencing in June. Appendix F of the Basic Assessment Report has outlined a detailed assessment of identified potential impacts of the proposed project and the surrounding biophysical and social environment. The report has also assessed identified mitigation measures and recommendations that will need to be implemented to minimise potential impacts. Although the benefits of the proposed project are considerable, impacts during construction, although short term, are likely to be significant. The assessment process has illustrated that most significant negative impacts compared to overall impacts of the proposed development will be on adjacent land users during the construction phase. A building inside the SEDA property between Market and Russell Street, a bus rank located on the north-eastern quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection and a taxi rank located on the north-western quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection will need to be temporarily closed during construction as they fall within the construction footprint of the proposed outbound flyover. Normal operation of Leopold Street and Russell


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 41 of 42

Street and surrounding road network will also be affected during construction; A number of lanes will remain closed on Leopold Street during construction. The assessment process has also determined that consultation with affected parties is important throughout the planning and construction phases of the proposed development. The proposed layout of the flyover is attached in Appendix A. The Traffic Department has considered alignment issues taking into consideration existing buildings, existing services, horizontal alignment design criteria, positioning of abutments and support structures and other aspects and agreed upon the current proposal that has been designed. No other feasible alternatives were identified in this regard. The assessment process has revealed that most of the impacts that are predicted to occur will be of short term duration and will be able to be mitigated to an acceptable level. Mitigation measures have been recommended during construction and operation to control traffic and related impacts to minimise disruptions to adjacent uses and road users. Mitigation measures will need to be followed to ensure adequate management of the surrounding physical and social environment. Refer Appendix F for detailed Impact Assessment Alternative A2 Alternative A3 No-go alternative (compulsory) Detailed description of the need and desirability of the proposed project is outlined in Sections 2&3 of Appendix F. The no-go option will therefore not address the underlying problem of the conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians in the Warwick Precinct. Should the proposed project not go ahead, the biophysical characteristics of the site and surrounding land uses, including noise and air quality, storm water drainage, SEDA eThekwini, public transport operations and informal traders, which would otherwise be affected by construction, would remain unchanged. The most significant impacts however would be the current situation of pedestrian and vehicular congestions and related safety impacts of the Warwick Precinct which will likely not to change. Refer Section 10.7 of Appendix F for detailed Impact Assessment

E. RECOMMENDATION OF PRACTITIONER Is the information contained in this report and the documentation attached hereto sufficient to YES NO make a decision in respect of the activity applied for (in the view of the environmental assessment practitioner). If “NO”, indicate the aspects that should be assessed further as part of a Scoping and EIA process before a decision can be made (list the aspects that require further assessment): If “YES”, please list any recommended conditions, including mitigation measures that should be considered for inclusion in any authorisation that may be granted by the competent authority in respect of the application: • An Environmental Management Plan – Shall be complied and submitted to DAEA, DWAF and eThekwini

Municipality- Environmental Branch for approval prior to construction. The EMP should include mitigation measures for construction and operation activities indicated in the Basic Assessment Report.

• Auditing during construction – An environmental auditor to be appointed to audit compliance with the EMP during the course of the construction phase.


KwaZulu-Natal


Page 42 of 42

APPENDICES The following appendixes must be attached as appropriate: Appendix A: Site Plan(s) Appendix B: Photographs Appendix C: Facility Illustration(s) Appendix D: Specialist reports Appendix E: Details of the Public Participation Process Including the

Comments and Responses Report Appendix F: Details of the Impact Assessment Appendix G: Other

Appendix A SITE PLANS

WARWICK FLYOVEROUTBOUND

Flyover Route Plan

THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED UNDER THE CONTROLSESTABLISHED BY THE SIVEST QUALITY MANAGEMENTSYSTEM AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SETAQUALITY GRADING SYSTEM THAT IS ISO COMPLIANT

"COPYRIGHT IS VESTED IN SiVEST IN TERMS OF THE COPYRIGHTACT (ACT 98 OF 1978) AND NO USE OR REPRODUCTION OR

DUPLICATION THEREOF MAY OCCUR WITHOUT THE WRITTENCONSENT OF THE AUTHOR"

4 PENCARROW CRESCENTLA LUCIA RIDGE OFFICE ESTATEUMHLANGA ROCKS, 4320SOUTH AFRICA

Phone: +27 31 5811500Fax: +27 31 5662371e-mail: [email protected]

Project No Map Ref No DatePrepared By

9009 9009/RP-02 R. Edwards 02/09/2008

±0 30 60

Meters

SOURCE: eThekwini Municipality

ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION

Legend

Outbound Flyover

Flyover Centre Line

+7,7m

RU

SS

ELL

RU

SS

ELL

D6A1A1

PILLAR JOINT

NEW TKMH

ABANDON

12.761m

14.078m CH107.945EXP JOINT

8x160mm

4x110mm

ABUTMENT(13.1 x 5)

51

5253 55

22

54

R=1.173

51

5253 55

22

54

R=1.173

+3303900 X

-1350 Y

+3303900 X

-1400 Y

400

100

375 ST

150 CI

375 ST

300

300

300

375375

375375

300

375

375

300

230

450

375

999

999

999

A216UP

A217UPA218UP

A65

A66

A67

400

100

DX913

DX910

DX913

0.3 LV 4c Al Paper ('77)

2.0

MV REDUNDANT

MV REDUNDANT

NUMEROUS REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

0.5 LV SINGLE ('62) REDUNDANT

0.5 LV SINGLE ('62) REDUNDANT

MV REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

S/T REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

S/T REDUNDANT

MV REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

MV REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

MV REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

LV REDUNDANT

LV REDUNDANT

LV REDUNDANT

M.S.S. No.7643

ALICE/RUSSEL ST.

ALICE ST.

S/P No.5058

M/CUBICAL

54pr Paper Pilot ('89)

(ALICE ST. MAJOR - MANNING RD M.S.S.)

6c 20pr Pilot ('89)


6c 20pr Pilot ('89)


15mm LV Tw ('79)

1.5

3.5

2 x 16mm LV 4c Cu PVC ('83)

C8310156/7

1.2('54)

MV REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

LV REDUNDANT

LV REDUNDANT

MV REDUNDANT

MV REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

Pilot REDUNDANT

LV REDUNDANT

NUMEROUS LV REDUNDANT

0.1 MV 3c

(ALICE ST. S/P - 102 ALICE ST. M.S.S.)

0.25 MV 3c

(ALICE STREET MAJOR - ML SULTAN TECH. COLLEGE S/S)

17.1

0.25 MV Cu

7.0

4.0

('82)

('82)

(ALICE ST. MAJOR - 207 WARWICK AVE. M.S.S.)

150mm MV 3c Al (Hammond '76)

(ALICE ST. MAJOR - MARSHALLS M.S.S.)


(ALICE ST. MAJOR - WALNUT RD EXPO. M.S.S.)




(CITY ENG. D.S.S. - CATHEDRAL RD MAJOR)


(NEW TECHNIKON S/S - ALICE ST. S/P)

(ALICE ST. M.S.S. - ALICE & RUSSEL M.S.S.)

3.9

('77)

('77)

('77)('77)

2.5

1.81.0

('76)

2.5

2.2

('76)

(ALICE ST. MAJOR - 190 OLD FORT RD M.S.S.)

6.3

240mm MV 3c Al ('76)

240mm MV 3c Al ('76)

(TO NEW TECHNIKON S/S)

1.2

150mm MV 3c Al Paper ('83)

0.1 MV 3c

0.1 MV 3c

(ALICE ST. MAJOR - WALNUT RD EXPO M.S.S.)

0.1 MV 3c

(TO MITCHELL CRES. S/P No.1)

0.25 MV 3c (Hollard '62)

(CATHEDRAL RD MAJOR - CITY ENGINEERS D.S.S.)

(ALICE ST. MAJOR - 190 OLD FORT RD M.S.S.)

2.0

3c 16pr PVC Pilot (Hammond '76)

(NEW TECHNIKON S/S - SEVENTH AVE. D.S.S.)


(CITY ENG. D.S.S. - CATHEDRAL RD MAJOR)


(ALICE ST. MAJOR - SEAL O/S GREYVILLE AUTO D.S.S.)

21.4

4.5

0.04 LV 4c ('70)

1.0

240mm LV 4c Paper ('76)

16mm LV 4c Cu PVC ('78)

L/S ('83)

16mm LV c/c Cu PVC ('78)


1.5


0.0225 LV Tw. ('63)

4 x 185mm LV Cu Droppers 'All' (2002)

E 0057275

300

300

300

375

300

375

375

LV OHMMV OHM33kV OHM

275kV OHM132kV OHM

150 CI

375 ST

3c 6pr Pilot (Hollard '62)

(ALICE ST. MAJOR - CITY ENGINEERS D.S.S.)

3c 6pr Pilot (Hollard '62)

3c 6pr Pilot (HOLLARD '62)

(ALICE STR. MAJOR - SEAL O/S GREYVILLE AUTO D.S.S.)

(NEW TECH. S/S - SEVENTH AVE D.S.S.)

MV REDUNDANT

LV REDUNDANT

NUMEROUS LV REDUNDANT

LV REDUNDANT

LV REDUNDANT

LV REDUNDANT

LV REDUDANT

0.06 LV ('75)

LV REDUNDANT

NUMEROUS REDUNDANT

NUMEROUS REDUNDANT

NUMEROUS REDUNDANT

NUMEROUS REDUNDANT

RU

SS

ELL S

TR

ASPHALT

WEARING COURSE

SURFACE TO BE TACK

COATED BEFORE

Appendix B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

DM/0141/07 PROPOSED WARWICK FYOVER OUTBOUND: BETWEEN LEOPOLD STREET AND CLEAVER ROAD - SITE PHOTOS Looking at the site form Leopold Street/Russell Intersection

Looking west from the site

Looking east from the site

Looking south-east from the site

Looking south from the site

Looking North-west from the site (route of flyover from Russell Street)

Looking north of the site on Russell Street

Looking at the proposed site form the N3 Western Freeway

Looking east from the site (notice the trees to be affected)

Looking south-east from the site

Looking west from the site on the Freeway outbound

Looking north-east form the site. Flat complex will not be affected

Looking south-west towards the taxi rank from Warwick Avenue

Looking south-east towards the bus rank from Warwick Avenue

Appendix C FACILITY ILLUSTRATIONS

Appendix D

Specialist Report None

Appendix E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Appendix E1 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REPORT

i

WARWICK MALL AND TAXI RANK PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REPORT

Contents Page

1. INTRODUCTION 2

1.1 BACKGROUND 2

1.2 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 2

2. LEGISLATION AND GUIDELINES 2

3. OVERVIEW OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS 3

3.1 Notification of Potential Interested and Affected Parties 3

3.2 Preliminary Basic Assessment Process 3

3.3 I&AP Register 4

4. SUMMARY OF THE ISSUES RAISED AND EAP RESPONSES 4 Appendices E1.1: Proof of Notification E1.2: I&AP Database E2: Comment and Response Report E2.1: Minutes of the Public Meeting E2.2: I&AP’s Responses Received

Client: eThekwini Municipality prepared by SiVEST DM/0141/07 Proposed Warwick Fyover Outbound: Between Leopold Street and Cleaver Road Basic Assessment Report Appendix E2: Public Participation Report Date: 01 September 2008 Page 2 of 11 P:\9000\9391 Warwick Mal LBA\Reports\BA Report\FBA - June08

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND SiVEST have been appointed as independent consultants to conduct a Basic Assessment for the development of the Warwick Flyover Outbound. eThekwini is proposing construction of an elevated flyover will link the Western Freeway and Leopold Street (terminating just before Russell Street). The proposed site is bounded on the east by Grey Street on the north by SEDA eThekwini, Johannes Nkosi Street, and Warwick inbound flyover currently under construction. On the west proposed site is bounded by Warwick Precinct, N3 Freeway and other adjoining roads, and on the south by residential flats, businesses, adjoining roads, bus rank, taxi rank and early morning g market.

1.2 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The principle purpose of this report is to:

To summarise the methods and extent of the public participation process followed for the basic assessment phase of this project;

To convey the issues raised by all I&APs and stakeholders during the basic assessment phase; and

To ensure that concerns raised during the public participation process are sufficiently addressed in the basic assessment report.

2. LEGISLATION AND GUIDELINES National Environmental Management Act (Act No 107 of 1998) – NEMA The National Environmental Management Act (Act No 107 of 1998) was promulgated on the 27th of November 1998. This Act replaces parts of the Environment Conservation Act (Act No 73 of 1989) with exception to certain parts pertaining to the Integrated Environmental Management. The act intends to provide for co-operative environmental governance by establishing principles for decision-making on matters affecting the environment, institutions that will promote co-operative governance and procedures for coordinating environmental functions exercised by organs of state; to provide for the prohibition, restriction or control of activities which are likely to have a detrimental effect on the environment; and to provide for matters connected therewith. Activities that may significantly affect the environment must be considered, investigated and assessed prior to implementation. In order to give effect to the general objectives of Integrated Environmental Management laid down, the potential impact on the environment socio-economic conditions, and the cultural heritage activities that require authorisation or permission by law and which may significantly affect the environment, must be considered, investigated and assessed prior to their implementation and reported to the organ of state charged by law with authorising, permitting, or otherwise allowing the implementation of an activity. This report outlines the process followed in informing I &AP’s of the proposed projects, the comments received from I &AP’s and responses provided thereto as required in Section E of the Basic Assessment Report, and in accordance with Chapter 36 of the EIA Regulations, 2006 promulgated under Section 24(5) of NEMA, Act 107 of 1998 as amended. DEAT (2005) Guideline 4: Public Participation, in support of the EIA Regulations, 2005, Integrated Environmental Management Guideline Series, Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT).

Client: Warwick Mall (Pty) Ltd prepared by SiVEST DM/0217/07 Proposed Warwick Mall and Taxi Rank Basic Assessment Report Appendix E2: Public Participation Report Date: 01 September 2008

Page 3 of 11 \\Dbnisa\sivest\9000\9009 - Warwick Flyovers\Reports\R2 - BA Report\Outbound

DEAT has produced a set of guidelines, to assist the various role-players in understanding what is required of them during the public participation process. The guidelines are to be used in conjunction with the NEMA regulations, to assist and provide information on the public participation requirements.

3. OVERVIEW OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS

The main objectives of the public participation process are to:

Identify Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs); Inform the I&APs of and provide sufficient background and technical information regarding the

proposed development; Create opportunities and mechanisms whereby I&APs can participate and raise their viewpoints

(issues, comments and concerns) with regard to the proposed development; Assist in identifying potential environmental (biophysical and social) impacts; Give feedback to I&APs on process findings and recommendations; and Ensure compliance to process requirements with regards to the environmental and related

legislation. 3.1 Notification of Potential Interested and Affected Parties

The process for notifying the I&AP’s that was undertaken was first the distribution of the Background Information Document to identified stakeholder and occupiers of the area within a 100m radius of the proposed site. This document was distributes by email, fax and by hand. This was done to obtain the necessary information to compile this report. The advertising process was followed in terms of the Regulation 56 of the Environment Impact Regulations published in Government Notice R385 in Government Gazette No. 28753 of 21 April 2006, Section 24(5) of the National Environmental Management Act (107 of 1998), as amended. Site notices were placed around the proposed site for development, Flyers were distributed for potential Interested and affected parties that were not identified. Furthermore Advertisements were placed in a local distribution news paper as well as in the national distribution newspaper. From the responses of the identified stakeholders and I&AP’s a database was created to capture the comments, issues and concerns raised.

3.2 Preliminary Basic Assessment Process Interested and Affected Parties where identified by visiting the proposed site and consulting landowners as well as business owners and municipal services. Additional I&APs were sourced form websites and databases from previous projects. A public meeting was conducted on the 29th August 2008 at the ITRUMP Project Centre at 13h00. Minutes of the public meeting are attched in Appendix E2.1. Comments and concerns raised during the public consultation process were noted and can be viewed in Appendix E2, Comments and Response Report.

3.2.1 Announcement of Project At the announcement of this project the following methods where used to inform possible I&APs:

On-site notices were placed along Leopold Street, including the affected bus rank and taxi rank – 8 English, 8 Zulu

Pamphlets Distribution (within 100m radius of project site) – 1000 pamphlets Background Information Document sent out to identified stakeholders by fax, email; hand

delivery, including adjacent landowners and business. Newspaper Advertisement as follows;

Client: Warwick Mall (Pty) Ltd prepared by SiVEST DM/0217/07 Proposed Warwick Mall and Taxi Rank Basic Assessment Report Appendix E2: Public Participation Report Date: 01 September 2008

Page 4 of 11 \\Dbnisa\sivest\9000\9009 - Warwick Flyovers\Reports\R2 - BA Report\Outbound

Newspapers Language Date Distribution of paper

Mercury English 25th May 2007 daily Isoleswe Zulu 25th May 2007 daily Kwana in the City English and Zulu 25th May 2007 weekly Berea Mail English 29th May 2007 weekly

The notification document advised I&AP’s of the proposed project, invited them to register with the project and an invitation to the public meeting. A database of key Interested and Affected Parties was compiled.

3.2.2. Proof of Public Consultation Appendix E1.1 includes the following documentation as proof of Public Participation: Pamphlets Letters to I&APs and Key Stakeholders Copy of the BID Proof of Newspaper Advertisements for proposed project Invitation to Key Stakeholder Meetings A progress update was sent on the 24th June 2008 to I&APs advising them that the assessment

process was now in progress after it was paced on while the application for the Warwick Inbound was being prioritized. The Warwick Inbound flyover is now under construction.

3.3 I&AP Register Appendix E1.2 below includes a detailed I&AP database which includes registered Interested and / or Affected Parties and Key Stakeholders. Notice of the availability of the draft Basic Assessment Report for comment will be sent out to I&AP’s indicated on the database. 4. SUMMARY OF THE ISSUES RAISED AND EAP RESPONSES A Comments and Response Report is attached as Appendix E2.

Appendix E1.1 Proof of Notification

7

Copy of the BID

Prepared by SiVEST Environmental Division – Warwick Flyover Outbound Date 2 August 2007

1/3

BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT PROPOSED WARWICK AVENUE OUTBOUND FLYOVER:

[Between Cleaver Road & Leopold Street] (DAEA Ref# DM0141/07)

SiVEST Environmental Division has been appointed by eThekwini Municipality as independent environmental consultants to undertake the Environmental Impact Process for the proposed construction of the Warwick Avenue outbound flyover. The purpose of this Background Information Document (BID) is to provide Interested and Affected Parties with an opportunity to register, and to identify environmental issues and concerns associated with the proposed project. You are therefore invited to submit any comments and queries you may have to the details provided below. Title of the proposed activity Proposed Warwick Avenue outbound Flyover: between Cleaver Road & Leopold Street. Project Locality & Description The proposed development occurs within the Warwick Precinct, bounded by Berea Road in the south, Mansfield/Carlisle in the north, Cross Street in the east and Cleaver Road in the west (see attached layout- please contact me for should you need a hardcopy delivered). This precinct lies approximately 3.5 km from the sea and is relatively central in a north/south orientation. High capacity road based transport routes connect this area to the rest of city’s CBD as well as to the various residential, recreational, commercial and industrial areas within and bordering eThekwini. The proposed site is owned by the eThekwini Municipality in its entirety. The Berea Railway Station is located at the centre of this precinct, and handles the greatest number of passengers of any railway station within the city. The areas to the west and north of the railway station are characterised by a conglomeration of taxi and bus ranks that serve over 100 bus and 180 taxi destinations respectively, throughout the Municipality and further afield. The result is a large volume of public transport passengers traversing this precinct on foot to move between the various transport modes. This in turn has resulted in a significant informal trade sector to serve this pedestrian movement. The situation exists where approximately 110 000 vehicles (including buses and taxis), 400 000 pedestrians, as well as the large informal trade sector, compete for limited space on a daily basis. Description of the proposed activity The eThekwini Municipality wishes to construct an elevated flyover to serve as an extension of the Western Freeway on the outbound carriageway. The Warwick Precinct is characterized by high volumes of traffic that cut through the area, adding no value to the area and indeed detracting from its attractiveness. The high levels of traffic create an unsafe environment for residents, pedestrians and commuters alike and is a barrier to redevelopment and growth of the area. In order to address this issue, the eThekwini Municipality is proposing to separate the through traffic from the activities of Warwick Junction through the construction of fly-overs that take all through traffic over the highly congested quadrant of Market, Leopold, Warwick and Johannes Nkosi Street. The proposed project will link the Western Freeway and Leopold Street (terminating just before Russell Street), thus by-passing the highly congested Leopold / Market and Leopold / Warwick intersections on the outbound carriageway, and thereby improving traffic flow through the area in a safe and efficient manner. The proposed design of the link is approximately 1000m long, of which the elevated section is approximately 300m long, and will consist of 3 x lanes (12-15m wide). Refer to the attached layout for illustrations.

SiVEST 4 Pencarrow Crescent Phone + 27 31 566 2201 Environmental Division La Lucia Ridge Office Estate Fax + 27 31 566 2371 PO Box 1899 Umhlanga Rocks email [email protected] South Africa 4320 www.sivest.co.za


2/3

The project will affect some of the exiting servitudes including the railway line and existing roads, and taxi/bus ranks in the market towards Cleaver road. The servitudes might require closure during construction activities. There are also residential buildings and businesses established adjacent to the proposed route that may be affected. Please note that an inbound flyover, to link the Western Freeway with Johannes Nkosi Street (formally Alice Street) (terminating just before Russell Street), is also being proposed by the Municipality (EIA Reference No: DM/0066/06). Relevant Environmental Legislation Identification of the proposed activity identified in terms of Sections 24(2)(a) and 24(d) of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (as amended) in GN R.385 (21 April 2006) and which must follow the BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE as described in Regulations 22 to 26 of the Environmental Impact Regulations, 2006 promulgated in terms of Section 24(5) NEMA (Act 107, 1998) and published in GN. R.386 (21 April 2006). Activity 15: “The construction of a road that is wider than 4 meters or that has a road reserve wider than 6 meters…” Environmental Impact Assessment Process In line with environmental legislation, eThekwini Municipality has appointed SiVEST as independent environmental consultants to coordinate and manage the environmental authorization process as contemplated in Sections 24(2)(a) and 24(d) of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (as amended) in GN R.385 (21 April 2006). As part of the Basic Assessment process followed, the following tasks will be completed: 1. An advertisement in a local and regional newspaper inviting written comments giving Interested

and Affected Parties a fourteen (14) day period in which to register. 2. Submission of Background Information Document to identified Stakeholders including relevant

Government Departments as well as local residents. 3. Public participation processes which will include written notice of the proposed project to

Interested and Affected Parties I&AP’s located in the vicinity of the proposed project route. 4. Initiation of the Basic Assessment of all issued identified for incorporation into a Basic

Assessment Report to be submitted with an Application form to DAEA. A copy of the Basic Assessment Report will be made available for public comment prior to being submitted to DAEA.

Issues for consideration will be raised by the following means: • Inputs from I&AP’s during the public participation process. • Compilation of the information relevant to the proposed development, including reference to

existing specialist studies in area. • Site visit and assessment by the consultants and relevant specialists. • Evaluation of proposed design scope and potential impacts. Issues raised by I&AP’s will be incorporated into the Basic Assessment Report, which will be submitted to DAEA for consideration. The consultation process is predominantly aimed at informing stakeholders of the proposed development and soliciting those environmental issues that need to be addressed. Should you have any comments regarding this document please submit them to the contact person given below. Name of Consultant to contact: SiVEST Environmental Division PO Box 1899, Umhlanga Rocks, 4320 4 Pencarrow Crescent, La Lucia Ridge Office Estate, Umhlanga Rocks


3/3

Ph: 031 566 2201 Fax: 031 566 2371 Contact: Lebohang Tsoene Email: lebohangt @sivest.co.za Public Meeting Details: A Public Meeting will be held at ITRUMP Project Centre on Monday, 20 August 2007 at 14h00 (registration at 13h30). Please RSVP with Lebohang Tsoene by Friday, 17 August 2007. In order to ensure that you are identified as an interested and/or affected party, and to receive further information regarding this process; please submit in writing your name, contact information and interest in the matter to the contact person given above.

8

Proof of Newspaper Advertisements for proposed project

DM/0141/07 PROPOSED WARWICK FYOVER OUTBOUND: BETWEEN LEOPOLD STREET AND CLEAVER ROAD - SITE NOTICES

Progress Update to I&AP’s

Invitation to Public Meeting

1 9 5 22 0 0 2

50YEARS

SETA THREE STAR

GRADING SYSTEM Quality Management

Accredited

Dear Sir/ Madam

INVITATION TO PUBLIC MEETING

BASIC ASSESSEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF AN ELEVATED FLYOVER TO SERVE AS AN EXTENTION OF THE WESTERN FREEWAY ON THE OUTBOUND CARRIAGEWAY AS TO LINK THE WESTERN FREEWAY WITH LEOPOLD STREET You are cordially invited to attend a public meeting to be held on: DATE: Monday, 20 August 2007 TIME: 14:00 – 16:00 (Registration from 13:30) VENUE: ITRUMP Project Centre, 22 Stradford Road, Durban The meeting is part of the Basic Assessment (BA) process being undertaken by SiVEST for the proposed construction of an elevated flyover to serve as an extension of the western freeway on the outbound carriageway. Further details are contained in the BID Newsletter which is attached to this letter. As an identified Interested and / or Affected Party we would value your attendance at the meeting and have tried to locate it as centrally as possible. The purpose of the meeting is to present the findings of the Environmental Impact Report. We believe that such a meeting has value in allowing you to hear other stakeholder views and issues in context with your own, thus allowing for a more integrated approach. Attached, for your perusal, is a RSVP form. To facilitate arrangements, please can you provide your response to SiVEST by Wednesday, 15 August 2007. Please also indicate on your RSVP form any other person or organisation representative you believe should be invited. I thank you in anticipation for your active and meaningful participation in the EIA process, thus contributing to informed decision-making. We will appreciate your participation and inputs. Please call me should you require any further information at this stage. Yours faithfully

Louise Bester Environmental Consultant (Public Participation) SiVEST Environmental Division

SiVEST 51 Wessels Road Phone + 27 11 798 0600 Environmental Division PO Box 2921 Fax + 27 11 803 7272 Rivonia 2128 email [email protected] South Africa www.sivest.co.za

9009 LB 2 August 2007

Divisional Directors W A Pearce (Managing), D B Blair, J A Barnard A Division of SiVEST Directors *S D Leach (Chairman), M J Wright (Managing), *A R Bell, S G Joubert, H J McGlashan M J Meikle-Braes, T B Moloi, W A Pearce, H G D Regnaud, S A Selatile, G R Sims K Soni. A F Tomkins (*British) Offices in South Africa Durban, Johannesburg, Ladysmith, Pietermaritzburg, Richards Bay, King Williams Town, Bloemfontein Part of the SiVEST Group SiVEST SA (Pty) Ltd Registration No. 2000/006717/07 t/a SiVEST

Your Reference:

Our Reference:

Date:

1 9 5 22 0 0 2

50YEARS

1 9 5 22 0 0 2

50YEARS

SETA THREE STAR

GRADING SYSTEM Quality Management

Accredited

RSVP ON OR BEFORE WEDNESDAY, 15 AUGUST 2007

Ms Lebohang Tsoene SiVEST

PO Box 1899, Umhlanga Rocks Phone: (031)566 2201 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (031) 556 2371

Please indicate whether you will be attending / not attending the Public Meeting? YES NO

If not able to attend the Meeting, would you like to receive a copy of the minutes? YES NO PLEASE REGISTER THE FOLLOWING PERSON(S) ON THE PROJECT DATABASE:

Name: Organisation: Contact details: Address: Tel.: Fax: Cell: E-mail:

IF YOU WISH NOT TO RECEIVE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THIS PROPOSED PROJECT, AND PREFER TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT’S DATABASE, PLEASE SIGN BELOW AND RETURN THE FORM TO THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION CONSULTANTS WHO’S CONTACT DETAILS ARE PROVIDED ABOVE YES, please remove my contact details from the project database. SIGNATURE:

TITLE (Prof/Mr/Mrs) FIRST NAME

SURNAME CAPACITY (e.g. Secretary/Director)

ORGANISATION POSTAL ADDRESS

POSTAL CODE

TEL. NO.: ( ) CELL NO.:

FAX NO: ( ) E-MAIL ADDRESS:

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT(DAEA Ref# DM0141/07)

PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF AN ELEVATED FLYOVER TO SERVE AS AN EXTENTION OF

THE WESTERN FREEWAY ON THE OUTBOUND CARRIAGEWAY REGISTRATION AND

PUBLIC MEETING MONDAY, 20 AUGUST 2007

10

Appendix E1.2 I&AP Database

Warwick Outbound Flyover Identified I&AP Database

Organisation Name Telephone Fax Email Address

Mayor of EThekwini Municipality (EM)

Cllr. Obed Mlaba 031- 311 2110 031- 311 2111 [email protected] City Hall

Deputy Mayor of EThekwini Municipality (EM)

Cllr. Logie Naidoo 031-311 2115 031- 311 2019 City Hall 2nd floor

Land and Housing (EM) Cllr. Nigel Gumede 031-311 2035 031- 311 2031 [email protected] (PA) City Hall

Engineering (Roads, Electricity & Water)

Cllr. Visvin Reddy 031-311 2013 031- 311 2031 [email protected] City Hall

Chief Whip Ms. Fozia Peer 031-311 2153 031-311 [email protected] (PA)

Health & Welfare Ms. Nomvuzo Shabalala 031-311 2012 031-311 2030 City Hall

Informal Business / Co-operatives

Cllr Zandile Gumede 031-311 2118 031-311 2030 [email protected] (PA) City Hall

Ward 32 Councillor Cllr. Vusi Khoza 082 953 0970 086 513 5657 [email protected] 65 St Andrew Street, Durban

Ward 27 Coucillor Cllr Avrille Coen 031-337-2536/083 775 4963

031-337-0853 [email protected] 1102 Yarningdale, 199 Marine Parade

ITRUMP Mr. Adrain Masson 031-202 5785 031-202 5807 [email protected] 303 West Street, Durban

ITRUMP Ms. Sbongile Tyida 031-202 5785 031-202 5807 [email protected] 22 Stratford Road, Durban

ITRUMP Mr. Hoosen Moolla 031-2025785 031-202 5807 [email protected] 22 Stratford Road, Durban

Crèche Ms. Shirley Yell 031-309 4937 031-201 3001 126 Alice Street, Durban

Schools Mr. Neville Parathyras 031-2013001 031-201 3001 [email protected] 8 Wilton Gardens 338 St Thomas Road

DUT Mr. Len Rosenberg 031 204 2286 031-204 2896 [email protected] DUT- Department of Development Planning, Berea House, Steve Biko Campus, Mansfield Road, Gate 1

DUT Rodney Choromanski 031-305 5031 031-303 5254 [email protected] DUT- Department of Development Planning, Berea House, Steve Biko Campus, Mansfield Road, Gate 1

DUT Mr. T Gordon 031-2042713 031-204 2805 [email protected] DUT- Department of Development Planning, Berea House, Steve Biko Campus, Mansfield Road, Gate 1

Environmental Health Mr. K Bennett 031- 202 5785 031-311 3555 [email protected] 22 Stratford Road, Durban

Early Morning Market Mr Lois Mthembu 031-311 5110/00 031-465 4222 81 Flower Road, Clairwood

Early Morning Market Mr. Rahim Mohamed 031-207 1697 031-207 8053 [email protected] 81 Flower Road, Clairwood

Durban Chamber of Commerce

Mr. Denis Cockhead 031-266 5326 [email protected] Durban Chamber, 190 Stanger Street - 1st Floor, Durban, 4001

Jane Pillay 031-335 1000 [email protected]

Victoria Street Market Mr. R Moodley 082 920 4197 031-305 4094

Victoria Street Market Mr. A Sanichur 082 3513680 031-266 2334 [email protected]

LABOUR Mr. Z. Luzipho 031-304 1690 031-304 1822 [email protected] Suite No. 504, 5th floor, General Building No. 47 Field Street, CBD - Durban

Organisation of Civil Rights Mr. Sayed Mahomed 031-304 6451 [email protected] Suite 304, 3rd Floor, 332 Smith Street, Salisbury House, CBD - Durban

Organisation of Civil Rights Pretty Gumede 031-304 6451 [email protected] Suite 304, 3rd Floor, 332 Smith Street, Salisbury House, CBD - Durban

Informal Traders Association

Mr. Emmanuel Dlamini 083 412 2066 031-202 5707

Formal Traders Mr. A K Lockhat 031-207 3101 031-306 6429 1st Floor, Islam Centre, 114 Commercial Street

Formal Traders Mr. K T Manjee 031-309 2419 031-309 1513 [email protected] 324 B Grey Street, Durban, 4001

Formal Traders Mr. N Gounden 031-306 3316 174 Grey Street, Durban

Informal Sector Mr.Thulani Zama 031-3114500 031-3326408 75 Winder Street, Durban

Informal Sector Mr. Amos Mabanga 082 757 4194 031-3326408 75 Winder Street, Durban

Formal Business Mr. Ismail Mansoor 031-3048127 031-304 7530

Formal Business Mr. Ali Fakroodeen 031-3063337 031-306 1034

Formal Business Mr. Trevor Prince 082 730 7172 145 Berea Road, Durban

Minibus Taxi Association Mr. Kingdom Mngomezulu

072 485 0980 031-304 1233

Minibus Taxi Association Mr. Yusef Khaliva 082 562 7407 Bus Liason Committee Mr. Terry Murugan 083 777 4897 031-902 9029 18 Old Main Road,

Isiphingo, Durban

METRORAIL Mr. Sisa Mutwa 031-361 7225 [email protected] (PA)

Durban Station Room C03, Block C

METRORAIL Mr. L Ngcobo 031-306 0040 031-306 0010 [email protected]

METRORAIL Mr. D Hattingh 031-361 7186 031-361 7108 [email protected]

Durban Transport 031-309 5942 031-309 5108 102 Alice Street

SEDA - EThekwini Mr. Protas Madlala 031- 308 9900 031-309 5437 127 Alice Street, Durban

Durban Africa Ms. Lindiwe Mahlangu 031-304 4934 031-304 6196 [email protected]

Tourism KwaZulu Natal Ms. Phindile Makwakwa 031-366 7500 [email protected]

Botanic Gardens- Parks 312011303 312017382 Adm Building. Botanic Gardens

eThekwini Business Support Unit

Mr. Micheal Hlangu 031-311 4500 / 3114458?

031-332 6408 [email protected] 75 Winder Street, Durban

Ms. Mbali Makhaye 031-311 4498 031-332 6408 [email protected] 75 Winder Street, Durban

eThekwini Traffic / Law Enforce

Mr. Eddie van Burgen 083 281 1288 [email protected] Near old Soccer Stadium

EKZN Wildlife Dominic Weiners (033) 845-1999 (033) 845-1499 [email protected] Queen E Park 1 Duncan Mckensie Drive,Montrose. PMB

AMAFA Weziwe Shabalala 033 394 6543 033 342 6097 [email protected]

WESSA Di Dold 031-2013126 031-2019525 [email protected]

DWAF Mr Pat Reddy 031-336 2759 031-305 9915 [email protected] 88 Field Street, Southern Life Builing; 7th Floor

Department of Transport Mr Roy Ryan 033 - 342 4082 033 - 342 3962 [email protected]

172 Burger Street

Department of Land Affairs (Land Claims Commission)

Ms Thola Mpungose 033-355 8400 033 -342 3409 [email protected] African Life Building; 2nd Floor; 200 Church Street, PMB

Local Govt & Traditional Affairs

Mandisa Zungu 031 204 1741 031 204 1980 [email protected] 7 Buro Crescent, mayville

National Dept Minerals & Energy

Philip Jacob 031 333 9400 031 333 9403 Philip [email protected]

eThekwini Municipality Development Planning & Management

Mrs. D. van Rensburg 031-311 7136 031-311 7279 [email protected] City Engineers Building166 Old Fort Road

Warwick Outbound Registered I&AP's

Organisation Name Telephone Fax Email

Durban Transport A.K.Y. Lockhart 031 301 9744 031 306 6425

Durban Transport Kevin Bennett 031 202 5785 083 778 4146 [email protected]

Durban University of Technology R. Moodley 031 305 4094

eThekweni Municipality Business Support Thulani Nzama 031 311 4500 031 332 6408 [email protected]

eThekweni Municipality Business Support Beth Nelson 031 201 6816

eThekweni Roads Provincial Department Michael Hlangu 031 311 4500 [email protected]

Gov. Str. Coup Ass L. Rosenberg 031 373 2286 031 373 2896 [email protected]

ITRUMP John Wilkinson 031 506 5940 [email protected]

ITRUMP Strategic Focus Adrian Masson 031-202 5785 031-202 5807 [email protected]

Makabongwe Methodist Preschool M. Mbonane 031 906 2651 031 906 9840 [email protected] Remant Alton D. Hatting 031 361 7186 031 361 7108 [email protected] Remant Alton Moffat Muntu Mbonane 031 906 2651 031 906 9840

Remant Alton Petros Mntambo 031 304 2145 031 503 2330

Remant Alton T.C. Mfeka 031 504 2144 031 503 2330

Remant Alton B.P. Mntambo 031 504 2145 031 503 2330

Remant Alton M. Chetty 031 309 4126

Remant Alton Protas Madlala 031 308 9900 [email protected] Remant Alton- GM Manny Chetty 031 309 4126 031 309 8053 [email protected]

Remant Alton Land Transport

John Wilkinson 031 906 2651 031 906 9840 [email protected]

Remant Alton Land Transport

Thulani Mfeka 031 304 4126 031 503 2330

Resident Sibongile Tyida 031 202 5785

SARCC Metrorail J. Yell 031 309 4937 031 201 3001

SEDA eThekwini D. Christian 031 311 7618

Victoria Street Market Strini Nadasom 031 309 4126

Appendix E2 COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT

Client: Warwick Mall (Pty) Ltd prepared by SiVEST DM/0217/07 Proposed Warwick Mall and Taxi Rank Basic Assessment Report Appendix E2: Comments and Response Report Date: 03 July 2008

Page 2 of 9 P:\9000\9391 Warwick Mal LBA\Reports\BA Report\FBA - June08

1 INTRODUCTION

The Public participation Process forms an integral part of the EIA process. It is a mechanism that aids to identify potential impacts of proposed projects on the biophysical and the human environments. Identified Interested and Affected Parties (I&AP’s) are given an opportunity to comment on the proposed project and to make recommendations on mitigation requirements. The process followed in informing I &AP’s of the proposed projects is outlined in Section D of the Basic Assessment Report. This report presents comments received from I &AP’s and responses provided thereto in accordance with Chapter 36 of the EIA Regulations, 2006 promulgated under Section 24(5) of NEMA, Act 107 of 1998 as amended Details of the public consultation process followed are outlined in Appendix E1. Below is a table indicating comments received to date and responses thereof. Comments received have been included in the assessment of impacts for the proposed projects. Refer o Appendix F for a detailed assessment of identified environmental impacts of the proposed project.



2 COMMENTS AND RESPONSE TABLE NAME CONTACT DETAILS COMMENT/CONCERNS RESPONSE

COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT Ezemvelo KZNWildlife Date: 24th October 2007

Bongiwe Sambo IEM Development Planner (Contract) Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife Tel: 033 845 1902 Fax: 033 845 1499

[email protected]

This application was recently tabled and no biodiversity concerns have been identified. Only forward further documentation should you identify any biodiversity concerns that may arise in the course of this scoping process.

Comment Noted

SARCC Metrorail Date: 06 December 2008

Mr Langa Ngcobo Jen Man New Busseness Tel : 031 306 0040 Fax: 031 306 0010 [email protected]

Interprise Property Management Date: 06 December 2007

Mr Kavesh Singh Suit 215 Main Concourse Durban Station 65 NMR Avenue Durban 4001 Tel : 031 305 8756 Fax: 031 305 8765 [email protected]

A portion of the proposed construction will be built over Metrorail’s Railways network. We therefore need to be informed of commencement in order for us to arrange site visits to monitor and ensure safety of trains and commuters.

The original layout presented at the public meeting held on the 20th August 2007 (Minutes attached in Appendix E2) illustrated the flyover to terminate just before Grey Street thereby affecting the railway lines, however the layout has since been amended to ensure that the railway lines are not affected. The end point for the proposed flyover will now be just before Russell Street/Leopold Street intersection. In effect the length of the flyover has been decreased from 100m to approximately 800m. Refer to Appendix A for the updated layout.

SARCC Metrorails Contact: Mr. Danny Hattingh P.O.Box 47422, Greyville, 4023 Tel: 031 361 7186 Fax: 031 361 7108 Email: [email protected]

The affects that the project will have on the surrounding roads, should the project go ahead.

It is noted that during construction, Leopold Street. and Russell Street will be the most affected. However, total closure of these roads is not envisaged, only a decrease in the number of operational lanes as required. Other roads that will be affected periodically include Market Street and access to N3 Freeway from Market



NAME CONTACT DETAILS COMMENT/CONCERNS RESPONSE Street. These disruptions will be periodic and will depend on the location of construction activities at any given period. Impacts on traffic on these roads will be negative, but temporary during construction. The report has recommended that the construction programme, once finalized, should be communicated to affected land users and in time. The programme should also be appended to the final EMP for the project.

Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Date Received: 25 April 2008

Contact: Ms K. Pillay Tel: 031 336 2742 Fax: 031 305 9915 Email: [email protected]

Back ground information The Department would like to see the following matters addressed in the Basic Assessment report: 1. Management of solid waste and

hazardous waste material generated during the construction phase, should be include the storage of any materials, chemicals, fuel etc.

2. The stormwater management plan/system both for the construction workers.

3. The types of toilet facilities to be provided for the construction workers.

4. Information regarding the 1:50 and 1:100 year floodline of any rivers, if there are any located near the area proposed for upgrade.

5. The spill contingency plan for the construction phase of the project.

6. The Environmental Management Plan for the construction phase of the project.

7. Identification of any environmentally sensitive areas that could be impacted upon by the development.

the issues has been addressed in the Basic Assessment Report, see details in Appendix F, and additional responses as follows; 1. Management of solid waste and

hazardous waste during construction shall be included in the Environmental management plan for the proposed project. A cop[y of the plan will be submitted to DWAF for approval.

2. It is envisaged that runoff from the construction site will be directed into the existing Municipal drainage system. Mitigation measured for pollution of runoff shall be addressed in the EMP.

3. it is recommended that chemical toilets be used on site, and these should be emptied at least once a week. Or as required. Details of the these shall be induced in the EMP.

4. Management of hazardous substances shall be included in the EMP. Due to the nature of the site and surrounding land uses it is also recommended that storage of hazardous substances on site should



NAME CONTACT DETAILS COMMENT/CONCERNS RESPONSE be minimal and only should be brought onto site as and when required.

5. No sensitive areas have been identified to date hat could be impacts upon by the proposed development.

AMAFA Dated 04 July 2008

Contact: Mr. Sello Mokhanya P.O.Box 2685, Pietermaritzburg, 3200 Tel: 033 394 6543 Fax: 033 342 6097 Email: [email protected]

Amafa requests submission of submission of an Environmental scoping report in terms of the KZN Heritage Act (No.10 of 1997) as well as Section 38(8), Chapter 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act no:25 of 1999. A hard copy of the following information if not already included:

Topographic Map Aerial Photograph GPS Coordinates District Municipality Local Municipality Past land usage management

system applicable to the site and a summary of the proposed development including the extent thereof stipulated in hectares.

Lot number or Portion number Contact details

A copy of the draft Basic Assessment Report with the information requested will be sent to AMAFA for their comment

Councillor of Ward 27 Dated 20 August 2007

Contact: Ms. Avrille Coen 1102 Yarningdale, 199 Marine Parade, Durban, 4001 Tel: 031 337 2536, 083 775 4963 Fax: 031 337 0853 Email: [email protected]

Registered as I&AP and requested to be informed of all updates on the proposed project.

Background documents was emailed

Private Resident Contact; Nelson Beth Information needs to be given to the



NAME CONTACT DETAILS COMMENT/CONCERNS RESPONSE

18 Calgrove, 46 Currie Road, Durban 4001 Tel; 031 201 6816

residents on how the construction will affect residential property surrounding the construction area.

Makabongwe Methodist Pre-School Contact: Mrs. Shirely Yell 1 Marcaret Court. 26 Rapson road, Durban 4001. Tel: 031 309 4937/ 031 303 7438 Fax: 031 201 3001

Information needs to be given to the Business and residents surrounding the construction area on how the noise, traffic etc will have an impact on them.

ITRUMP Stratefic Focus Dated: 05 June 2008

Contact: Adrian Masson Registered as I&AP and requested to be informed of all updates on the proposed project.


Remant Alton Contact: Mr. Strilhi Nadasen 102 Alice Street, Durban, 4001 Tel: 031 309 4126 Fax: 031 309 8053

Registered as I&AP and requested to be informed of all updates on the proposed project

Grey St Coupley Ass Dated: 26 June 2008

Contact: Mr. Lochart Tel: 031 301 9744 Fax: 031 306 6429

Registered as I&AP and requested to be informed of all updates on the proposed project.


Remant Alton Dated: 25 June 2008

Contact: Manny Chetty Tel: 083 778 1249 Fax: 031 309 8053 Email: [email protected]

Registered as I&AP and requested a copy of the Background information document

Background documents was emailed. Main access to the property is already affected the construction of the Inbound Flyover currently under construction. with regard to the proposed outbound flyover, access on to Johannes Nkosi Street from Russell Street will be affected at a certain period when construction is concentrated on the Russell Street/ Leopold Street intersection.

COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Appendix E2.1 MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC MEETING

PROPOSED WARWICK FLYOVER OUTBOUND BETWEEN LEOPOLD STREET AND WESTERN FREEWAY 20 August 2007 Page 1 of 5 Rev.1 10/08/07

PROJECT NAME: WARWICK FLYOVER OUTBOUND

PROJECT NO. 9009

DESCRIPTION: PUBLIC MEETING

VENUE: BOARDROOM, ITRUMP PROJECT CENTRE

DATE & TIME: 20 AUGUST 2007 @ 14H00

NEXT MEETING: TO BE ANNOUNCED

ID Company Tel Fax Cell Email Chairman Louise Bester LB SIVEST 011 798 0638 011 803 7272 083 787 2615 [email protected] In Attendance Michelle Nevette MN SiVEST 031 566 2201 [email protected] D. Hatting DH SARCC Metrorail 031 361 7186 031 361 7108 [email protected]

J. Yell YD Makabongwe Methodist Preschool 031 309 4937 031 201 3001

M. Mbonane MM Remant Alton 031 906 2651 031 906 9840 [email protected] T.C. Mfeka TF Remant Alton 031 504 2144 031 503 2330 B.P. Mntambo BN Remant Alton 031 504 2145 031 503 2330 M. Chetty MC Remant Alton 031 309 4126

Protas Madlala PM SEDA eThekwini 031 308 9900 [email protected]

D. Christian DC eThekweni Roads Provincial Department 031 311 7618

Michael Hlangu MH eThekweni Municipality Business Support 031 311 4500 [email protected]

Thulani Nzama TN eThekweni Municipality Business Support 031 311 4500 031 332 6408 [email protected]

Beth Nelson BN Resident 031 201 6816 Sibongile Tyida ST ITRUMP 031 202 5785 John Wilkinson JW Durban Transport 031 506 5940 [email protected] A.K.Y. Lockhart AL Gov. Str. Coup Ass 031 301 9744 031 306 6425

L. Rosenberg LR Durban University of Technology 031 373 2286 031 373 2896 [email protected]

R. Moodley RM Victoria Street Market 031 305 4094 Strini Nadasom SN Durban Transport 031 309 4126 083 778 4146 Kevin Bennett KB ITRUMP OPs 031 202 5785 [email protected]

Adrian Masson AM ITRUMP Strategic Focus 031-202 5785 031-202 5807 073 370753 [email protected]

Apologies Nikki Goven NG Police Forum Lunga Ngobe LN Metrorail 031 361 7186 Distribution As above

NOTE: All persons present at the meeting will be deemed to have taken note of such items as concerns him/her.

Failure to receive these notes timeously cannot be taken as a reason for not taking the necessary action.

SiVEST 4 Pencarrow Crescent Phone + 27 31 566 2201 La Lucia Ridge Office Estate Fax + 27 31 566 2371 PO Box 1899 Umhlanga Rocks email [email protected] South Africa 4320 www.sivest.co.za


ITEM NO.

ITEM DESCRIPTION

ACTION

COMPLETION DATE

1. Welcome, Introduction and Purpose of the meeting NOTED N/A 2. Background to the proposed project NOTED N/A 3. Proposed Environmental Studies NOTED N/A 4. Public Participation Process NOTED N/A 5. Discussion Session

5.1 Project Description

R. Moodley: Requested an overview of the outbound project.

Derrick Christian: Gave a quick overview of the outbound project.

L. Rosenberg: Asked for confirmation of where the flyover will lift off from.

Derrick Christian: Explained, with the help of the map on the presentation, that the flyover will from Leopold Street and go over the Warwick Avenue,, Market Road, and the bus station and terminate onto the Western Freeway.

Beth Nelson: Enquire on whether they have a display model of the proposed development.

Derrick Christian explained that due to time constraints no model is currently available, but that they will look into the possibility.

5.2 Effect of proposed project on Leopold Street

A.K.Y. Lockhart: Enquired on the 3 existing elevations and the effect on Leopold Street.

Strini Nadasom: Enquired on whether alternative routes have been planned for traffic flow, because this is an extremely busy area.

Derrick Christian: Said that only a small portion of Leopold Street will be affected and that they plan on leaving one or two lanes open in most of the construction areas for traffic to flow through, depending, of course, on safety aspects. They will do their best to make the best of the situation, but no definite detours have been planned of as yet.

L. Rosenberg: Enquired on what area will the scaffolding take up.

Derrick Christian: Approximately four lanes.

5.3 Inbound Flyover

A.K.Y. Lockhart: Raised the fact that the map shows quite a few lanes, of which one lane comes into Alice Street on the inbound section and wanted to know if there will be any additional lanes.

Derrick Christian: Explained that the additional lines on the map were some of the alternatives that have been considered. He explained that the flyover will be kept in between the existing buildings and Alice street will be kept as is. Some building constraints might exist. They want to avoid use any of the


ITEM NO.

ITEM DESCRIPTION

ACTION

COMPLETION DATE

commercial or industrial land.

J. Yell: Explained that she missed out on the meeting of the inbound and she wanted to confirm the bypass and the influence on the school.

Derrick Christian: Explained that he will set up a meeting with her to discuss all her queries.

M. Chetty: Enquired on how many lanes will be open on Alice Street.

Derrick Christian: Explained that there will be some lane restriction in Alice Street. A part of Alice Street will be closed, but detours will be clearly indicated.

M. Chetty: Enquired on when the project for the inbound section of the Warwick Flyover will start.

Adrian Masson: The project must be finished by 2010, therefore as soon as possible.

Comment that all these projects cannot happen simultaneously. They need to ensure that alternative routes are not being worked on during the construction period for the Warwick Flyover projects.

Derrick Christian at this stage it is not envisaged that roadworks will be carried out on alternative routes during the work on the flyover.

L. Rosenberg: Enquired on the access to the taxi and bus ranks.

Adrian Masson: There will be a split of to Alice Street and the rest will stay the same.

Enquiry on when construction will start.

Derrick Christian: Construction is proposed to start early next year or if not, only after 2010.

5.4 Effect in surrounding landuses

A.K.Y. Locaazt: Mentioned the fact that there is a taxi rank at the bottom of the proposed inbound and that the safety of the taxi drivers and the pedestrians should be taken into account.

Derrick Christian: Explained that it proposed ultimately to rationalise the public transport systems that have developed over the years. The only actual change to the traffic will however be that the traffic will be elevated. Alice street is to be used for public transport facilities.

D. Hatting: enquired on the construction period and the influence thereof on Metrorail. He mentioned that they have had previous bad experience with this type of construction.

Derrick Christian: Explained that they are confined to the Amended the


ITEM NO.

ITEM DESCRIPTION

ACTION

COMPLETION DATE

proposed alignment. They need to go over the railways. They will however still have discussions with Metrorail on the rail lines that will need to be open and they will work out a time schedule for the construction period. The construction period is anticipated to be between two and two and a half years. Due to the complexity of the railway area, the construction around this area will probably take about 50-60% of the construction time.

project footprint to exclude railway lines.

D. Hatting mentioned that the allocation of land needs to be discussed with the engineers.

Derrick Christian: Explained that the tendering period was supposed to be in October 2008, but that more time is needed. A requirement of FIFA is that no construction be done during the 2010 Soccer World Cup. He mentioned that they need feedback from Metrorail on the existing design, and will consult directly with Metrorail at the appropriate stage.

Thulani Nzama: Enquired on what will happen with the informal traders in the area and which buildings would be demolished.

Derrick Christian: Mentioned that he has been liaising internally with Michael Hlangu from the Informal Traders Business Support Unit.

Michael Hlangu: Insists on SiVEST keeping the informal traders informed of the project..

Derrick Christian: Assures him that the informal traders are one of the identified groups which will be dealt with individually. This is however only a preliminary meeting to record current concerns with this project.

A.K.Y. Locaazt: Enquired on the proposed mitigation intended when it comes to the informal traders.

Derrick Christian: Explained that he had a meeting with Michael Hlangu 3 months ago to tell him about the project. The idea is to relocate them. It is important for them to be accommodated and they have been given an opportunity to decide on where they want to be relocated.

5.5 Effect on surrounding Road network

L. Rosenberg: Commented that if lanes would have to be closed during work to be done on the N3, there will be severe disruptions to the traffic.

R. Moodley: Enquired on whether vehicles will still be able to get onto Alice street from the highway.

Derrick Christian: Confirmed that it will be possible to get from the highway to Alice Street.

R. Moodley: Enquired whether there will be any changes to the Russel Street intersection.

J. Yell: Enquired on what the effect will be on Centenary Road.


ITEM NO.

ITEM DESCRIPTION

ACTION

COMPLETION DATE

Derrick Christian: Explained that these roads will not be severely affected, but might be restricted during the construction period.

Adrian Masson: A new proposal mentioned. It is proposed that Beatrice Street is connected to Warwick Avenue. This will open up a big area and will mean that Alice Street can be used for public transport.

Enquiry on when work on Russell Street onramp will commence.

Derrick Christian: No work is proposed to start yet, but as soon as it is planned everyone will be informed.

R. Moodley: Explained that in essence they are very happy about the project because is shows Durban is on the move.

6. Closure of meeting

Appendix E2.1 I&AP’S RESPONCES RECEIVED

Date: 04 July 2008

Ref: 2008/07/04 - 06 Attention: Lebohang Tsoene Tel: 031 581 1575 Fax: 031 566 2371 Email: [email protected]

Dear Lebohang

RE: DM/0141/07 WARWICK AVENUE OUTBOUND FLYOVER

Amafa KZN Heritage requests the submission of an Environmental Scoping Report in terms of the KZN Heritage Act (No. 10 of 1997) as well as Section 38 (8), Chapter II of the National Heritage Resource Act no: 25 of 1999.

A hard copy of the following information is required if it was not included in the BID:

a) Topographic Map;

b) Aerial Photograph;

c) GPS Coordinates;

d) District Municipality;

e) Local Municipality;

f) Past land usage management system applicable to the site and a summary of the proposed development including the extent thereof stipulated in hectares;

g) Lot Number or Portion Number;

h) Contact Detail

Your cooperation will be appreciated in this regard.

Yours faithfully,

Sello Mokhanya (Principal Heritage Officer-Archaeology)

Amafa AkwaZulu-Natali PO Box 2685 Pietermaritzburg 3200 Heritage KwaZulu-Natal Tel: 033 394 6543

Fax: 033 342 6097 Erfenis KwaZulu-Natal Email: [email protected]

Website: www.heritagekzn.co.za

1

Lebohang Tsoene

From: Kavi SoniSent: 24 October 2007 09:19 AMTo: Michelle Nevette; Lebohang TsoeneSubject: FW: Official EKZNW Comment

Kavi SoniDirectorTown and Regional Planning DivisionTel + 27 31 566 2201Fax + 27 31 566 2371Cell +27 82 90 39824Email [email protected] www.sivest.co.za Consulting Engineers * Project Managers * Environmental Consultants * Town and Regional Planners Offices in: Durban * Johannesburg * Pietermaritzburg * Richards Bay * King Williams Town * Ladysmith Disclaimer: This message and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please notify SiVEST immediately.

-----Original Message-----From: Shannon MullerSent: 24 October 2007 09:18 AMTo: Kavi SoniSubject: FW: Official EKZNW Comment

Shannon MüllerSecretarySiVEST Corporate Services

Tel +27 31 566 2201Fax + 27 086 632 9649

Email [email protected] www.sivest.co.za Consulting Engineers — Project Managers — Environmental Consultants — Town and Regional PlannersOffices in: Durban — Johannesburg — Pietermaritzburg — Richards Bay — King Williams Town — Ladysmith

-----Original Message-----From: Patrick Skhumbuzo Kubheka [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 24 October 2007 09:27 AMTo: Shannon MullerSubject: Official EKZNW Comment

Dear Sir/Madam

Elevated Flyover to Serve as an exstinsion of the western freeway on the outbound Carrlageway as to link the western freeway with leopold street

This application was recently tabled and no biodiversity concerns have been identified. Only forward further documentation should you identify any biodiversity concerns that may arise in the course of this scoping process.

This form of email commentary for 'letters of no concern' is now considered acceptable to DAEA.

Please acknowledge receipt of this email.

2

Kindest regards

Patrick KubhekaDevelopment Planner (Contract)Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife

Lebohang Tsoene

From: Lebohang TsoeneSent: 27 June 2008 04:03 PMTo: '[email protected]'Subject: 9009 Proposed Warwick Avenue Outbound Flyover (DM/0141/07) (27-06-08)

Page 1 of 1

2008/08/21

Dear Mr. Lockhart Thank you for your interest in the proposed project. Just a reminder that a public meeting was held on the 20th

August 2007 (not 17th August as indicated in the notification letter). I have attached minutes of the meeting for your information. If you have any additional comments/concerns that you need addressed please submit them to the undersigned in writing. We will keep you informed of further developments on this project. Kind regards Lebohang Tsoene Environmental Planner SiVEST Environmental Division Direct + 27 31 581 1575 S/Board + 27 31 581 1500 Fax + 27 31 566 2371 / 5 email [email protected] website www.sivest.co.za Consulting Engineers Project Managers Environmental Consultants Town and Regional Planners Offices in: Durban Johannesburg Pietermaritzburg Richards Bay Ladysmith Eastern CapeI

Lebohang Tsoene

From: Avrille Coen (DA Councillor) Ward 27 [[email protected]]Sent: 20 August 2007 10:48 AMTo: Lebohang TsoeneSubject: EIA Warwick Street.

Page 1 of 1COUNCILLOR AVRILLE COEN

2008/08/21

COUNCILLOR AVRILLE COEN Ward 27

(North Beach, Greyville, Windermere, Morningside) 1102 Yarningdale

199 Marine Parade Durban 4001

Tel: 031-337-2536 Cell: 083-775-4963 Fax: 031-337-0853

Email: [email protected]

SiVEST Environmental design Lebohang Tsoene Tel 031 566 2201 Dear Lebohang, I would be grateful if you would please register me as an I & AP for Warwick Junction proposal linking the Western Freeway with Leopol Str. My apologies for not attending today’s Public Meeting, but an urgent situation has arisen. Updates on all reports and further meetings can be e-mailed to my address as above. Thanking You, Avrille Avrille Coen Councillor: Ward 27: North Beach, Morningside, Windermere & Greyville.

Lebohang Tsoene

From: Lebohang TsoeneSent: 27 June 2008 03:47 PMTo: '[email protected]'Cc: '[email protected]'Subject: 9009 Proposed Warwick Avenue Outbound Flyover (DM/0141/07)

Page 1 of 1

2008/08/21

Dear Manny Thank you for your interest in the proposed Warwick Avenue Flyover Outbound. As requested please find attched background Information Document distributed previously to inform stakeholders of the project. The project will be assessed in detail in the draft Basic Assessment report which will be made available for public review. Please do not hesitate to contact me for any comments regarding the project. Kind regards Lebohang Tsoene Environmental Planner SiVEST Environmental Division Direct + 27 31 581 1575 S/Board + 27 31 581 1500 Fax + 27 31 566 2371 / 5 email [email protected] website www.sivest.co.za Consulting Engineers Project Managers Environmental Consultants Town and Regional Planners Offices in: Durban Johannesburg Pietermaritzburg Richards Bay Ladysmith Eastern Cape

1

Lebohang Tsoene

From: Shannon MullerSent: 06 June 2007 08:41 AMTo: Lebohang TsoeneSubject: FW: Warwick Flyover EIA

Regards, Shannon MüllerSecretary to Jean Meikle-BraesFinancial DirectorSiVEST Tel +27 31 5662201 Fax + 27 31 5662375Email [email protected] Disclaimer : This message and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please notify SiVEST immediately.

-----Original Message-----From: Adrian Masson [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: 05 June 2007 04:40 PMTo: Shannon MullerSubject: Warwick Flyover EIA

Lebohang,

Your background info document was delivered to me today.

Unfotunately it contained only page one and two copies of page2. Will you please e-mail me the complete document.

Regards

Adrian Masson

Appendix F IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 BACKGROUND TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT ................................................................................ 1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 3

3.1 DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT .............................................................................................................. 3 3.2 NEED AND DESIRABILITY............................................................................................................. 4

4 SITE LOCALITY........................................................................................................................................... 5 5 A DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED ............................................................................ 5

5.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 5 5.2 ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................................... 6 5.3 NO GO OPTION .......................................................................................................................... 6

6 IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS ........................................................................................................ 7 6.1 METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................................................... 7 6.2 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS ............................................................................................... 7

7 KEY ASPECTS/CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................................................... 7 7.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE ................................................................................................... 7 7.2 CONSTRUCTION PHASE .............................................................................................................. 7 7.3 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PHASE ....................................................................................... 9

8 A DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND HOW IT MAY BE AFFECTED ......................... 10 8.1 BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT..................................................................................................... 10

8.1.1 Climatic Conditions ................................................................................................................. 10 8.1.2 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................. 10 8.1.3 Geology....................................................................................................................................... 12 8.1.4 Drainage and hydrology ......................................................................................................... 12 8.1.5 Ecological Diversity ................................................................................................................. 13

8.2 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PROJECT AREA.......................................................... 13 8.2.1 Land Use and Livelihoods ..................................................................................................... 13 8.2.2 Infrastructure and Services ................................................................................................... 17 8.2.3 Health and Safety ..................................................................................................................... 18 8.2.4 Noise and Vibrations ............................................................................................................... 20 8.2.5 Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place................................................... 21 8.2.6 Cultural Heritage Issues ......................................................................................................... 23

9 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION ... 24 9.1 THE RATING SYSTEM................................................................................................................ 24 9.2 PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE.................................................................................................. 25 9.3 THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE ..................................................................................................... 28 9.4 THE OPERATIONAL PHASE ........................................................................................................ 37 9.5 THE DECOMMISSIONING PHASE ................................................................................................ 42 9.6 CUMULATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .................................................................................... 43 9.7 ASSESSMENT OF THE NO-GO OPTION....................................................................................... 46

10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ...................................................................................... 49 11 CONCLUSION........................................................................................................................................ 49 12 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 50 13 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................... 51

Client: eThekwini Municipality DM/0141/07 Proposed Warwick Fyover Outbound: Between Leopold Street and Cleaver Road Basic Assessment Report Appendix F: Impacts Assessment Report Date: 01 September 2008 Prepared by SiVEST Environment Division Page 1 of 51


DM/0141/07 PROPOSED WARWICK AVENUE OUTBOUND FLYOVER:

BETWEEN CLEAVER ROAD & LEOPOLD STREET DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

1 INTRODUCTION

In terms of Section F of the Basic Assessment Report, a report detailing the identification and assessment of environmental impacts is required. The components of the report must adhere to the minimum requirements in the EIA Regulations, 2006.

2 BACKGROUND TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT The Warwick Precinct is characterized by a fragmented public transport service with high volumes of traffic, pedestrians and commercial activity competing for limited space. The various public transport, ranks and stations, and the attractions of the commercial and education institutions, generate pedestrian traffic volumes in excess of 400 000 people daily. The resulting situation can be described as follows1: From a traffic capacity perspective, The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes, result in the western gateway to the city having huge congestion and delays to pedestrians and vehicles. From a safety perspective, The high levels of traffic and the lack of suitable pedestrian space, result in congested pedestrian walkways and overflow onto the road. This together with a lack of adequate enforcement creates an unsafe environment for residents, pedestrians and commuters and results in the Warwick Precinct consistently having one of the highest accident rates in the City, not mentioning the costs of these accidents to the Government. It is estimated that the Warwick Precinct has higher than normal pedestrian related accidents of 125 per annum, which is 2.2 times greater than the Metropolitan average. The costs of these accidents are estimated to be in the region of R18 million per annum. From a development perspective, The high vehicular and pedestrian volumes acts as a barrier to redevelopment and growth of the area. This congestion has led to the fragmentation of activities, in particular the public transport ranks. This has resulted in inefficient use of valuable land, in a prime location within the City. This inefficient use of land also inhibits the development and growth of the area. Lack of defined and dedicated trading space to cater for demand also results in trading operating at undesirable locations, exacerbating problems of congestion and urban degradation. This in

1 Referenced from the Report For Committee, Warwick Junction Revitalization Program prepared by eThekwini Transport Authority / iTRUMP, 2005 (Eta 20/05 Ref No. 15/1/6/6/2/2)


turn inhibits private sector participation and investment, which in turn inhibits the possible redevelopment of the area to be able to realize its full potential, including that of tourism. In addition the area serves as a gateway into the City, and currently detracts from the many positives that the real City has to offer. In view of the growing number of national and international events being staged in the city not least of which the much anticipated 2010 World Cup, and from a broader long term tourism perspective, the proposed project is required.

The eThekwini Municipality has proposed a four pronged strategy to support and enhance the Warwick Precinct as described below. The intention of the strategy is to create a precinct whereby the various lands uses that characterise the area can interact together in a safe and attractive manner. This has been considered within the context of the following initiatives for the City: Regeneration initiatives along the beachfront and Point Introduction of people mover systems in the city Rationalisation and reorganisation of the public transport distribution systems through the

CBD Restructuring of the public transport system to the city including rail investment and the

re-vitalised Taxi Re-capitalisation program Intense interest in an African themed commercial centre for traditional activities and trade Soccer World Cup 2010 and the associated spin offs. Growing numbers of tourists into the city.

The four pronged strategy proposed by the eThekwini is described below: 1. Create a predominantly pedestrian preference corridor in the precinct The proposed development is part of the Municipality strategy to direct vehicular traffic away from the precinct as far as possible. The intention is to have through traffic in and out of the city to by-pass the precinct. The two part strategy involves construction of two elevated flyovers to link the CBD with the Western Freeway and by-passing the precinct. These projects are intended to improve pedestrian and vehicular congestion of the Warwick Precinct, and to improve transportation networks and roads across the CDB in preparation for the 2010 World cup and beyond. Refer to Section 3 below for a detailed project description for the proposed outbound flyover. The construction of the inbound flyover commenced in March 2008 and is expected to be completed by November 2009. 2. Rationalise, consolidate and organise the public transport movements into a single

integrated complex. Subsequent to (1) above, and a corresponding decrease in the levels of congestion, the next step would be for the reorganization of the public transport of the area. In terms of the ITP, rail forms the backbone of the public transport system, and thus it is proposed to form a public transport zone in which a modal interchange is created that links Berea Station directly with the bus and taxi operations of the area. In addition to the rationalisation and reorganisation of the public transport, this also includes the rationalization of trading within the area, maintaining the symbiotic relationship that exists between the two, and preserving the economic viability of the area.


3. Consolidate and develop existing available land for heritage/social/commercial and

residential activities The next step in the process is the revitalization and strengthening of the existing land uses by means of urban redevelopment and design as a result of the reduced congestion and land gains from the preceding steps. Included in this is the expansion and strengthening of the existing emergency and health services in the area which is a vital part of the City’s objective in terms of service delivery. This step would include the establishment of a core flagship project that would inject new capital into the area. With a world community that is increasingly mobile and constantly seeking new travel and recreational horizons, it is essential that the City offers something exotic to the rest of the world. Concepts like an African Bazaar present enormous tourism opportunities for the City and the existing Material Management Department site, when rationalized, may offer an excellent area for this proposal. 4. Connect the precinct to the city via non motorized transport (NMT) ways and via the CBD

Public Transport Circulatory Systems In tandem with the above, it would be necessary to ensure that the daily movement of people into the city could be delivered efficiently to the end destination throughout the city. It would also be necessary to look to make it convenient and desirable for tourists to access this precinct from the beachfront and Point areas. An information supported Inner City Public Transport CBD Circulatory System would enable this and could then link to the People Mover along the beachfront. The concept is that the system would be made up motorised and non-motorised routes that give access to places of employment and interest.

3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Development Layout

The eThekwini Municipality is proposing to construct an elevated flyover to serve as an extension of the Western Freeway on the outbound carriageway. The proposed activity forms part of the Municipality's two initiatives to improve transportation networks and roads across the CBD in preparation for the 2010 World cup and beyond. The construction of the flyover is expected to be completed by May 2010. As briefly described in Section 2 above, the Warwick Precinct is characterized by high volumes of traffic that cut through the area, adding no value to the area and indeed detracting from its attractiveness. The high levels of traffic create an unsafe environment for residents, pedestrians and commuters alike and are a barrier to redevelopment and growth of the area. In order to address this issue, the eThekwini Municipality is proposing to separate the through traffic from the activities of Warwick Junction through the construction of flyovers that take all through traffic over the highly congested quadrant of Market, Warwick, Leopold, Johannes Nkosi (formerly known as Alice Street).


The proposed project will link the Western Freeway and Leopold Street (terminating just before Russell Street), thus by-passing the highly congested Leopold / Market and Leopold / Warwick intersections on the outbound carriageway, and thereby improving traffic flow through the area in a safe and efficient manner. The proposed project length is approximately 800m comprising 3x3.5m lanes. The proposed layout of the flyover is attached in Appendix A. The inbound flyover currently under construction will link the Western Freeway and Johannes Nkosi Street (terminating just before Russell Street), thus by-passing the highly congested Old Dutch Road/Johannes Nkosi Street/Market Road intersections on the inbound carriageway. The two flyovers will ensure improved pedestrian and public transport flow within the precinct. The proposed development will affect a number of land users in the precinct and their daily operations during the construction phase. A building inside the SEDA property between Market and Russell Street, a bus rank located on the north-eastern quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection and a taxi rank located on the north-western quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection will need to be temporarily closed as they fall within the construction footprint of the proposed outbound flyover. Normal operation of Leopold Street and Russell Street and surrounding road network will also be affected during construction; a number of lanes will remain closed on Leopold Street during construction.

3.2 Need and Desirability

The proposed construction of the Warwick Flyover is expected to have the following benefits: The proposed project will have the immediate positive impact on the area by significantly

reducing the number of vehicles routing through the area (whose destination is not in the Warwick Junction).

The reduction of traffic through the Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection is expected to reduce the number of accidents and potential conflicts that occur within the area, thus saving human life. While the inbound flyover currently under construction will ease congestion on Old Dutch Road/Johannes Nkosi Street/Market Road/ Centenary Road intersection.


The reduced traffic congestion, conflicts and land gains result in a more safe and efficient circulation of traffic, which is expected to facilitate the reorganization and rationalization of the public transport system and trading.

It is envisaged that pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths will be improved and increased in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity.


The future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) will have better access to and from the City.


Refer to Section 2 above for further detail regarding the need and desirability of the proposed project. Construction of the outbound flyover is expected to be completed by May 2010, in time for the 2010 World Cup commencing in June. The construction period is expected to be 20 months. In line with FIFA requirements no construction activities will be allowed in all host cities during the tournament. The implications in timeframes are that construction is expected to commence no later than November 2008.

4 SITE LOCALITY

The proposed site lies within eThekwini Municipality CBD Warwick Precinct. Street Address: eThekwini Municipality CBD Warwick Precinct – between Cleaver

Road and Leopold Street terminating just before Russell Street. Zoning: Transportation Zone Landuse: Existing, roads, business buildings, taxi rank and bus rank Geographical coordinates Latitude /Longitude Degrees Minutes Seconds South 29 51 17.6 East 31 00 36.5

Appendix C1 illustrates the locality of the proposed site. The proposed site is located at the western boundary of the Central Business District CBD of eThekwini Municipality KwaZulu- Natal, through the Warwick Precinct. This precinct lies approximately 3.5 km from the sea and is relatively central in a north/south orientation. High capacity road based transport routes connect this area to the rest of city’s CBD as well as to the various residential, recreational, commercial and industrial areas within and bordering eThekwini. The proposed site is bounded on the east by Grey Street on the north by SEDA eThekwini, Johannes Nkosi Street, and Warwick inbound flyover currently under construction.. On the west proposed site is bounded by Warwick Precinct, N3 Freeway and other adjoining roads, and on the south by residential flats, businesses, adjoining roads, taxi rank, bus rank and early morning Market. Photographs of the proposed site and surroundings are included in Appendix B.

5 A DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFIED 5.1 Introduction

The EIA Regulations, 2006 guideline document stipulates that the environmental investigation needs to consider feasible alternatives for the proposed development. The developer should be encouraged to consider alternatives that would meet the objective of the original proposal and which could have an acceptable impact on the environment. The role of alternatives in the EIA process is therefore to find the most effective way of meeting the need and purpose of the proposal, either through enhancing the environmental benefits of the proposed activity, and or through reducing or avoiding potentially significant negative impacts.


5.2 Alternatives

The following alternatives have been considered:

Option 1 - Do nothing – This will not address the underlying problem of the conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians.

Option 2 - Do Minimum – This option involves at grade improvements to improve safety but still does not address the underlying problem.

Option 3 - Pedestrian Overpass – This would address the problem but due to site constraints results in the up and down movement of pedestrians which results in a resistance to utilise, hence problem not fully addressed.

Option 4 - Vehicle Underpass - Problems with underground services and tie-into existing infrastructure.

Option 5 - Route alignment options. These were discounted due to impacts on existing buildings and infrastructure. This is discussed further below.

Option 6 - Current preferred option. This offers the best balanced solution. Leopold Street currently serves as the main route directing traffic from the north of the city and the beachfront through the CBD via Warwick Precinct, to major areas west of Durban and visitors going back to Johannesburg or the airport. In order to improve traffic flow in terms of travel time, safety, sense of place etc, eThekwini Municipality has realised the need to re-direct traffic exiting the city away for the Warwick Junction, hence the proposed flyover will link Leopold Street with the N3 Western Freeway directly. The Traffic Department has considered alignment issues taking into consideration existing buildings, existing services, horizontal alignment design criteria, positioning of abutments and support structures and other aspects and agreed upon the current proposal that has been designed. No other feasible alternatives were identified in this regard. Any other realignment from Leopold to the Western Freeway would require permanent demolishing of buildings and disruption of the railway lines further north-east of Russell Street/Leopold Street intersection. It is determined therefore, in terms of the explanation given above, that no other feasible alternatives exist for the proposed Warwick Flyover Outbound due to existing land uses and infrastructure surrounding the proposed site. In making a decision regarding the proposed development, the potential impacts on the proposed site by the development during construction should be weighed against the need for the proposed flyover and its associated benefits. The proposed design of the road has to a degree taken into account the potential impacts on site, especially with regard to the existing land uses and infrastructure in close proximity to the road.

5.3 No Go Option

The “no-go” option addresses the scenario of the status-quo remaining the same, with no development on the proposed site. Consideration of the no-go option is compulsory as stipulated in the Basic Assessment Form. The no-go option does not address the underlying problem of the conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians in the Warwick Precinct. Potential


Impacts of the no-go option are listed in the Basic Assessment Form and outlined in Section 10.6.

6 IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS 6.1 Methodology

Issues for consideration have been raised by the following means: Input from I&AP’s during the public participation process. Input from eThekwini Municipality and their correspondence with public transport

operators (taxis and buses),,and SEDA eThekwini Desktop research of information relevant to the proposed development. Site visit and professional assessment by the EAP. Evaluation of proposed design scope and potential impacts based on EAP’s past

experience.

6.2 Public Participation Process

In line with environmental legislation, SiVEST as independent environmental consultants coordinated the public participation process as contemplated in Regulation 56 on Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations 2006, published in terms of Sections 24(2)(a) and 24(d) of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (as amended) in GN R.385 (21 April 2006). Details of the public participation process are included in Appendix E.

7 KEY ASPECTS/CONSIDERATIONS2

The following section provides an indication of what activities and facilities are likely to be undertaken during the planning, construction and operational phases of the proposed project, including the associated inputs and outputs. From this understanding the potential impacts the development may have on the environment and/or constraints the environment may impose on the development, are derived (as described in Section 8).

7.1 Planning And Design Phase

Activities and Facilities Identification of transport needs and demands Development of transport policies and demands Requirements in terms of land use planning and integrated development planning initiatives Road network planning Road corridor selection Road alignment; horizontal vs. vertical The need for a storm water drainage system Surveying Identification of sources of construction material Notification to traders to relocate

2 Referenced from the Roads: Information Document for Environmental Assessment, Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, December 2003, First Edition.


Activities and Facilities Notification of public / private transport operators to relocate

7.2 Construction Phase Activities and Facilities Inputs / Resource Use Outputs / Waste Production Construction camp and its

associated facilities (including lay-down areas)

Storage camps and laydown areas − Materials and equipment

stockpiles − Handling and storage of

hazardous materials including chemicals additives, gravel, cement, concrete and lubricants

Source of water Bulk earthworks, grading and

contouring. Drilling, blasting, Movement of construction staff,

equipment and materials Importation of selected materials

/ base layer construction. Construction of a surfaced layout

− Sub-base and base layers (Excavations, Grading, Importation of fill materials and selected gravel materials for sub-base and base layers, Application of water, Compaction and Disposal of spoil material (excess excavated soil)

− Construction of wearing course (Asphalt layer, Bitumen seal, Tar seal, Concrete and Paving block)

Noise and vibrations Dust suppression Waste production and temporary

storage/disposal i.e. used fuels, waste concrete and bitumen, spoil materials and general waste

Use of asphalt/bitumen (and associated storage and mixing areas, chemicals)

Concrete batching plan (and associated storage and mixing areas, chemicals)

Bitumen Tar Cement Chemical additives used in

concrete / asphalt (i.e. retarders)

Paving blocks / bricks Aggregate (sand and stone) Gravel (fill material for

embankments / selected material for sub-base and base layers)

Water − Drinking, cooking and

sanitation at construction camps

− Water for dust suppression − Water applied to base and

sub-base layers during compaction

− Water for application to sub-base and base layers prior to compaction

Petrochemicals Other chemicals / lubricants /

paints Construction vehicles,

machinery and equipment Temporary energy supply to

construction camps Labour

− Recruitment of construction workforce

− Skills training Public movement control

− need barriers (not just danger tape) to protect people from trenches during construction

Old asphalt (removed from road carriageway during road upgrade)

Waste concrete and other construction rubble

Waste bitumen Waste tar Used fuels, lubricants, solvents

and other hazardous waste General waste Contaminated soil

− Soil contaminated with bitumen

− Soil contaminated with tar − Soil contaminated with

petrochemicals (i.e. oils and lubricants) and other chemicals

Sewage and grey water (temporary construction camp sanitation)

Spoil material (excess soil removed during excavations)

Noise and vibrations (construction vehicles and machinery)

Lighting at construction camps, equipment yards and laydown areas

Plant material removed from servitude / right-of-way during vegetation clearance

Smoke and fumes − Burning of waste − Fires used for cooking and

space heating (construction camps)

− Vehicle exhaust emissions


Activities and Facilities Inputs / Resource Use Outputs / Waste Production Rehabilitation of disturbed areas Interaction between construction

workforce and local communities Management of the passing

pedestrians & points of congestion

Relocation of shelters for informal traders prior to construction commencing

Reminders to adjacent businesses of construction with timeframes

7.3 Operation and Maintenance Phase Activities and Facilities Inputs / Resource Use Outputs / Waste Production Signage Safety barriers Lighting Cut and fill embankments Vehicles and pedestrians using

along the road Road accidents and breakdowns Vehicle exhaust emissions Noise and vibrations Litter collection Maintenance

activities − Road reserve vegetation

maintenance (pruning / cutting)

− Repainting of road markings − Pothole repair, crack sealing

and road shoulder repair − Resealing / resurfacing − Safety barriers repairs

Special event management required during operational phase, to manage pedestrian flow (e.g. for World Cup)

Labour Vehicles and equipment used

for inspections and maintenance

Tar / bitumen and aggregate used during resurfacing / repair of potholes

Special event management of pedestrian movement through use of barriers etc.

Vehicle exhaust emissions Dust Particulates from tyre, brake

and road wear Petrochemical products leaking

from vehicles and entering stormwater

Hazardous spills during road accidents and breakdowns

Visual exposure of road infrastructure

Plant material (removed during maintenance of vegetation cover in road reserve)

Noise and vibrations Lighting


8 A DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND HOW IT MAY BE AFFECTED3

8.1 Biophysical Environment 8.1.1 Climatic Conditions

The Bioresources Groups of KwaZulu-Natal K G Camp CEDARA (January 1997) has reference. The climate of the eThekwini region is described as humid subtropical with a warm summer and mild winter. The regional mean temperature is 25ºC in summer and 20ºC in winter. The humidity in summer is 80% and 60% in winter. The mean annual rainfall is approximately 1000mm, ranging from 900mm to 1050mm, mostly falling during September to April with only about 150mm falling in the period May to August when evaporation totals about 370mm. The climate is generally frost-free. Implications and management Rainfall intensity and run off rates may have implications on road safety, affecting the visibility and the condition of the road. The corrosive nature of coastal climatic conditions may impact on road infrastructure, including road side signage and safety barriers. Furthermore climatic conditions play an important role during dispersion of noise and air pollutants. Strong winds may aggravate the generation of fugitive dust associated with mass earthworks during construction. The following mitigation measures are suggested: Construction activities may need to be suspended on days with high rainfall intensity

and/or wind. The proposed flyover should be designed to minimise incidents of road surface flooding

and improve road surface storm water drainage, thereby reducing unsafe road conditions during the operation phase.

Provide warning signs and suggested speed limits during dangerous conditions.

8.1.2 Air Quality Road developments are known to have negative effects on roadside air quality (DEAT, 2003). Roadside pollution is often localized and generally only affects a narrow band of road along the sides of the road. The major source of roadside pollutants is vehicle exhaust emissions. Other pollution sources emanate from combustion of hydrocarbon fuels in air producing carbon dioxide (CO2) and secondary pollutants such as lead (Pb), hydrocarbons (HC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulphur dioxide(SO2) etc. Emissions depend on the volume of traffic, the type of vehicle (including age, technology, and maintenance levels of the vehicle), fuel composition and quality, engine temperature and road geometry. The highest emission rates are encountered in congested, slow moving traffic, and whenever

3 Generic Impacts associated with road developments referenced from the Roads: Information Document for Environmental Assessment, Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, December 2003, First Edition.


vehicles shift gears, decelerate, accelerate or travel over steep gradients. There is also a tendency for emission rates to increase at high speeds. Implications and management Air pollution from exhaust fumes can become a health concern where heavily used roads run through settlements and urban areas. Furthermore dust and particulates from fuel combustion (mainly diesel), tyre, brake and road wear may be responsible for dirtying and staining of surfaces, objects and buildings immediately adjacent to the road. The proposed project area is located within the Central Business District CBD of eThekwini Municipality and is characterised by high volumes of traffic that cut through the area. A number of residential flats exist on the southern side of Leopold Street and are therefore in close proximity to the project area. The purpose of the project is to separate the through traffic from the activities of Warwick Junction through the construction of flyovers that take all through traffic over the highly congested quadrant of Market, Leopold, Warwick and Alice Street (Johannes Nkosi). This will have the added advantage of encouraging vehicles to travel at a constant and efficient cruising speed. The project is expected to result in an improvement to road capacity in addition to minimising congestion. Traffic being re-directed away from the Warwick Precinct will help improve air quality conditions in the area. Overall the proposed flyover will serve existing vehicular traffic and no increase in air pollution is envisaged, as a result. During the construction phase fugitive dust can also impact on roadside air quality. Dispersion and deposition of pollutants are dependent on climatic conditions such as prevailing wind direction and together with the topography, presence of manmade buildings and structures, and roadside vegetation. The following mitigation measures are suggested: The proposed geometric design should minimise steep gradients and sharp turns and

encourage vehicles to travel at a constant, efficient cruising speed. Dust generating construction activities should be avoided during strong winds. Management (including storage, transport, handling and disposal) of hazardous

substances used during construction. Guidelines that deal with the control of air pollution on site should be outlined in the

Environmental Management Plan. Ensure compliance with the Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act and the Air Quality Bill. Ensure compliance with emission standards applicable to the area through which the

road is aligned. Enforce speed limits and regulate roadworthiness of vehicles during operation of the

road. Monitoring of air pollution levels in potential problem areas should be undertaken.


8.1.3 Geology A summary of the geology and foundation conditions at Old Dutch Spurs, prepared by Dr. T.E. Francis and dated 14 June 2007, is provided below. It is assumed that this information applies to the general geological conditions of Warwick Precinct. Seven boreholes with SPT’s and core drilling into shale and dolerite bedrock were completed. Bentonite drilling mud was used and measured water levels in holes are not reliable. Pietermaritzburg Shale bedrock occurs at depths of about 21m in the west in Old Dutch Road and falls away eastwards, to 27 m near Grey Street (Dr Yusuf Dadoo). A local bedrock hillock occurs under the old Alice St. Electricity Dept. at BH 3, where a Karoo dolerite intrusion has resisted weathering. St. Lucia Formation siltstone of Cretaceous age extends east of this point, covering the older shale bedrock with 4.5 m of softer, shell-rich limestone and siltstone. The bedrock surface may be stepped rather than uniformly sloping and possibly covered by quartzite boulders and cobbles in places. The water table is very shallow and tends to be perched on clay layers that may also cause artesian conditions in Warwick Avenue. Layers of mixed fill cover natural ground surface in many places. Implications and Management Foundation Design, Bearing Capacity and Settlement. Piled foundations relying on end bearing on bedrock will be necessary. Rock shoes would be required to penetrate any boulders and key into a sloping or weathered, broken rock surface. The alternative of bored piles socketed into bedrock would also be suitable. Strong water flows into open excavations below the water table will occur, causing sidewall collapse. Settlement of fills on the estuarine sediments will occur, with its rate and amount being governed by the presence, thickness and compressibility of clay layers. The design of the site drainage system should be adequate to control runoff from the

development site in line with topographical features of the site. Appropriate design standards should be applied.

8.1.4 Drainage and hydrology

Water is a scarce resource in South Africa and therefore any potential development must take into account existing sources, patterns of use, and potential risks of contamination. According to the generic impacts associated with road developments referenced from the Roads: Information Document for Environmental Assessment, (DEAT, 2003), roads are designed to drain freely in order to prevent standing water on the road carriageway. Pollutants settling on the road surface and litter are washed off during rain. Runoff from roads produces a highly variable discharge in terms of volume and quality. In most instances runoff from roads have no discernable environmental impact unless it is in close proximity to watercourses, downstream watercourses, wetlands or estuaries. Implications and Management The proposed development is situated within an existing built up area where road infrastructure already exists. No water courses, wetlands or estuaries occur within the project


location. Due to the nature and locality of the proposed project there is unlikely to any impacts on water resources within the area. The following mitigation measures are suggested: Ensure compliance with applicable legislation, such as the National Water Act, Water

Services Act, Lake Areas Development Act, Hazardous Substances Act, and Integrated Pollution and Waste Management Bill.

Ensure that stormwater drainage systems are adequately designed. Improve existing alignments and drainage systems. Provide containment areas for potential pollutants at construction camps, refueling

depots, asphalt plants and concrete batching plants. Appropriate waste management practices should be implemented during construction

and operation of the road. The transport, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous substances must be

adequately controlled and managed. 8.1.5 Ecological Diversity

The proposed development is situated within an existing built up area where road infrastructure already exists. No areas of ecological diversity occur within the project location. Due to the nature and locality of the proposed project there is unlikely to be any biodiversity impacts within the area. eKZNWildlife indicated that no biodiversity concerns have been identified (Email dated 24th October 2007). The proposed construction of the flyover will affect existing roadside trees between the Western Freeway outbound and inbound carriageways. These trees are envisaged to have been planted by eThekwini Parks Department. Funds will have to be provided for the relocation of the Palm Trees that will be affected. The following mitigation measures are suggested: Relocate or re-establish important floral specimens The Department should work closely in conjunction with Parks and Gardens /

Architecture with regards to the re-location of important floral specimens.

8.2 Socio-Economic Characteristics Of Project Area4 8.2.1 Land Use and Livelihoods 8.2.1.1 Economic Activity

According to the Report to the Committee (2005) prepared for the Warwick Junction Revitalisation Programme, the Warwick Junction represents an economic gateway into the City for a large number of the urban poor and offers the opportunity for small and micro

4 Referenced from the eThekwini Transport Authority / Itrump (2005) Warwick Junction Revitalisation Programme, Report For Committee, ETA 20/05 Ref No. 15/1/6/6/2/2


enterprises to establish themselves. A high number of buses, taxis, and trains enter and leave the area on a daily basis bringing and taking many workers to and from the centre, as well as thousands of visitors, shoppers, and informal traders. The area is considered one of the premier centres in the country for trading in traditional medicines and traditional healing. Other activities include:

• Cardboard collectors • Pavement sleeping • Mealie cookers • Hairdressers

• Taxi washing • Bovine head cooking • Shebeens • Underground services

• Driving schools • Kerb-side wash-ups • Repairs & maintenance • “Big blitz” operations

It is estimated that the annual turnover for the area is approximately R800M (Clem Sunter/iTRUMP). This economic potential has led to a huge influx of street trading which ironically has contributed to the visual degradation of the area, in terms of congestion, litter, and lack of pedestrian space. On a regional scale, the Warwick Precinct is a crucial commuter hub in the District. The low-income working population pass through the Precinct by buses, trains and taxis on a daily basis to get to and from their working centres. The bulk of this population originates from outside townships areas. The need for over 90 000 people to commute in and out of the CDB and through the Precinct will continue to fuel demand for improved transportation network through out the CDB.

8.2.1.2 Residential

The area is a long established residential and mixed-use neighbourhood, with many of the buildings considered to be of heritage significance. However, in recent years, reduced residential amenity and service provision have lead to a downward spiral of the area, with many premises in a state of disrepair. A number of downgraded residential flats exist south of Leopold Street and also west of Market Road. A tremendous potential exists to re-establish parts of this area as a desirable residential node (eThekwini Transport Authority / Itrump, 2005). The residential node located in the Market/Warwick/ Berea/Western Freeway quadrant is under revitalization.

8.2.1.3 Educational Institutions

The Durban Institute of Technology is situated within the north-west sector of the Warwick Precinct with a satellite campus in the south. In addition there are a large number of primary and senior schools, driving schools as well as a development centre for small businesses within the vicinity.

8.2.1.4 Health & Emergency Services

The area is well served with health facilities. Central Hospital and St Aidens Hospital is situated on Centenary Road with the City Hospital located further within the city. The Lancers Road clinics, the Prince Zulu Communicable Disease Centre and TB clinic, with dedicated STI and TB diagnostic facilities serve a large number of patients. Adjacent to it is the ambulance depot. The Fire Department is located in Centenary Road.


8.2.1.5 Smme Development

SMME development is an integral part of the City’s Economic Development Strategy, catered for at the eThekwini Business Development Trust on Johannes Nkosi Street. Informally this area attracts numerous traders and small business ventures seeking to take advantage of the large volumes of pedestrians (eThekwini Transport Authority / Itrump, 2005). There is an estimated 3200 (both formal and registered) informal traders in the Warwick Precinct. However, lack of defined and dedicated trading space to cater for demand has seen many of these traders operating at undesirable locations, exacerbating problems of congestion and visual degradation. The existing formal facilities (Victoria Street, Old English Market, Early Morning and Grey Street) have not kept pace with the increased demand for expanded economic activities. There are indications from the public that Council has been communicating plans to consider the needs of informal traders and the underprivileged in new developments in the City. The plans include upgrading of English Market. Other future projects being planned by the Council include two pedestrian bridges from the proposed site dropping into Market Street. These will provide good linkages and integration trading posts which are currently scattered.

8.2.1.6 Ex. Materials Management Department Site

The Ex. Materials Management Department Site is a prominent site on Johannes Nkosi Street that has valuable buildings in terms of the City’s built and cultural heritage and offers considerable redevelopment opportunities. The current usage of the site as a depot for buses and other Council Departments is not considered optimal. Negotiations are presently under way with Remant/Alton to reduce their occupation of this site and the Solid Waste Unit is expected to vacate the areas they occupy in the very near future (eThekwini Transport Authority / Itrump, 2005).

8.2.1.7 Transportation

The area is characterized by a fragmented public transport service, with taxi and bus ranks located across the entire Warwick Precinct area. Due to the proximity of rail, bus and taxi, a large proportion of all public transport trips are transfers. The existing road network links the City to the west via two major arterials through this area of high pedestrian activity. The high pedestrian volumes together with the high vehicle volumes and the lack of suitable pedestrian space result in pedestrian walkways being extremely congested and dangerous, with pedestrians utilizing the roadway. Implications and Management The current situation is described in Section 2. The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes acts as a barrier to redevelopment and growth of the area. The area serves as a gateway to the City, and currently detracts from the many positives that the City has to offer. The proposed project is part of a broader strategy for Warwick Precinct and the greater Durban area (refer Section 2). The benefits of this proposed project are described in Section 3.2.


In conjunction with the Warwick flyover inbound currently under construction the proposed flyover outbound is expected to bring about positive economic benefits in the medium to long term. Local road side businesses, public transport, education and health facilities, etc are likely to benefit. The proposed development forms part of an overall strategy for the area to reorganise and rationalise public transport systems and trading, reduce areas of conflict and improve safety of users, and make better use of the land available for economic activity. The proposed project is therefore likely to increase the area available for pedestrian movement and roadside activities. It is envisaged that as a result of this project, pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths will be improved and increased in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity. This will improve the safety of pedestrians while making markets more accessible. It is hoped that the improvement in the area will increase the quality of the tourism experience being offered, by enhancing the sense of place of the project area that originally attracted tourists (it is anticipated that the project will result in improved safety and aesthetics). Furthermore access into and through the area (to destinations closer to the coast or further inland) will be improved. The future developmental and event needs will have better access to and from the City. The construction of the flyover outbound is expected to be completed by May 2010 in time for the 2010 Soccer World Cup commencing in June that year.

Impact on pedestrian flow and taxi operations The proposed development will affect the use of a bus rank located on the north-eastern quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection and a taxi rank located on the north-western quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection. At least sections of these ranks will need to be temporarily closed during construction as they fall within the construction footprint of the proposed outbound flyover. Leopold Street does not experience considerable amounts of pedestrian flow as compared to Market Road and Johannes Nkosi Streets. In addition, Leopold Street does not host any taxi rank, bus rank or off-street parking; the same is true for the N3 Western Freeway connection point to be located further from the precinct. Impact on Traffic Flow The design caters for all the traffic on Leopold Street to by-pass the Warwick Area and to join the N3 Western Freeway outbound with no unnecessary disruptions inside the Warwick Junction. During construction however there will be reduction in the number of operating lanes on Leopold Street and backing up of traffic especially during peak hours. Contrary to the construction of the inbound flyover, no traffic detours and total closure of roads are envisaged. It is expected that motorists may choose to use other alternative routes to avoid slow movement of traffic on Leopold Street due to the reduction in lanes. The Traffic Department will need to finalize the lane markings and the final traffic layout will need to be appended to the final EMP. Impact on Access At a certain period during the construction phase access on Russell Street will be affected. Accesses to the Durban Transport property is already affected by the closure of Johannes Nkosi Street due to the construction of the inbound flyover, currently under way. Residents


and businesses located south of the Leopold Street have access via an off-ramp from Grey Street/Leopold Street intersection. This access will not be affected by construction activities.

The following mitigation measures are recommended: The eThekwini Roads Provision Department will need to inform Taxi Associations and the

Bus Liaison Committees of the implementation of the project and the associated time frames. Identified representative associations were notified of the proposed development. Refer to I&AP database in Appendix E1.


Provide slow lanes, paved shoulders and safe crossings where necessary. Consult with local communities regarding location of construction camps, access and

hauling routes, and other likely disturbances during construction. Provide clear and realistic information regarding alternative accesses for local

communities and businesses in order to prevent unrealistic expectations. A traffic monitoring strategy in consultation with the Metro Police should be implemented.

Traffic monitoring for the first three months would be necessary to address: − Adjustments to traffic signal settings − Traffic counts and traffic management at peak hours

Impact on Informal Traders and SEDA eThekwini As indicated above the construction of the flyover will require temporary closure of the bus rank and the taxi rank. Informal traders in located in this vicinity will also be affected and will need to be relocated.

The eThekwini Roads Provision Department has indicated that consultations are currently taking place internally with the Informal Trade Department regarding this matter. Affected street traders will need to be notified in writing about the above development. Identified informal trade association already notified in writing of the proposed project are listed in the I&AP database in Appendix E1. Site notices were also placed within the taxi and the bus rank. ITRUMP has also been informed of the project and likely impacts. At the public meeting held on the 20th August 2007, it was indicated that consultation will continue with affected informal traders in consultation with the Informal Trade Department. The proposed route will also affect a building utilized by SEDA eThekwini. The building is within the construction footprint and will need to be closed during the construction phase. It is anticipated that construction will continue for a period of 20 months. Alternative arrangements will need to be made.

8.2.2 Infrastructure and Services

There are a number of existing infrastructure and services (roads, railway line, power lines, and possibly underground pipelines along Leopold Street) in the vicinity of the proposed Flyover.


Implications and Management There is likely to be temporary disruption of infrastructure and services during the construction of the proposed Flyover. This activity will need to be undertaken prior to construction of the flyover commencing. The eThekwini Municipality will need to notify affected service providers of the proposed project should the relocation of these services be required. Location of piles for the bridge is the only aspect of the development that may affect underground services. Metrorail will not be affected by the proposed project, as the flyover terminates just before Russell Street, while the railway lines are located further north-east. It is noted that the original layout presented at the public meeting held on the 20th August 2007 (Minutes attached in Appendix E2) illustrated the flyover to terminate just before Grey Street thereby affecting the railway lines, however the layout has since been amended to ensure that the railway lines are not affected. The following mitigation measures are recommended: Consult with service providers. Minimise alignments that would interfere with existing and potential future infrastructure

and services. Keep construction related disturbances to a minimum. Consult with affected communities or businesses prior to foreseeable disruptions, for

example notifying residents of a temporary severance of water supply. Consult with affected communities or businesses regarding impacts on access to

infrastructure and services and alternatives. Provide access points to infrastructure and services. Provide conduits / ducts / culverts for other infrastructure and services. Monitor complaints by the public. The EMP should include a complaints register.

8.2.3 Health and Safety

Road developments may impact on health and safety in the following ways:

8.2.3.1 Air pollution

Air pollution from exhaust fumes can be a health concern in heavily trafficked areas. Air pollutants can be inhaled directly from the air, or ingested from touching surfaces or objects where pollutants have settled. Refer to Section 8.1.2 for more detail.

8.2.3.2 The use of hazardous chemicals in the construction of the road

During construction, the use of hazardous chemicals in the construction of a road can pose potential environmental, health and safety risks. In South Africa, the term ‘tar road’ is generally used for all roads surfaced with either a ‘tar’ or ’bitumen’ compound. According to the generic impacts associated with road developments referenced from the Roads: Information Document for Environmental Assessment, (DEAT, 2003). Tar contains dangerous volatiles that are soluble in water, including carcinogenic phenols (benzo[b]fluoranthene) and other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which can leach


into water and is likely to cause cancer upon prolonged skin contact. Tar fumes burn the skin and lungs. Tar was widely used in road construction until some 15 years ago. Although tar has largely been replaced with bitumen, tar is still used as a primer on most roads in South Africa and sometimes when roads are patched (pothole repair) (Civil Engineering Contractor, 2002). The objective should be to avoid the use of tar.

Bitumen has relatively low levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and is largely inert (Civil Engineering Contractor, 2002). However, certain other potentially hazardous chemical may be added to the bitumen or to the aggregate during the construction process in order to render the compound more workable. The objective should be to use the least hazardous chemicals available and to locate asphalt plants, aggregate stockpiles and mixing areas where they do not pose a significant environmental risk. It is almost inevitable that there will be a certain amount of waste bitumen and asphalt produced, and some contamination of soils with bitumen, during the construction of a road. Ideally, the waste should be reused in the construction process. Where not reused, it should be remediated or disposed of in such a way as to minimise potential environmental impacts. The upgrading of roads may involve the stripping and demolition of old asphalt layers. Ideally, old asphalt should be reused during construction of the new road in order to avoid large quantities of waste being produced. However, depending on the availability and cost of virgin aggregate in the area through which the road is aligned, reusing the old asphalt may be more costly than using virgin aggregate. In South Africa, most asphalt on existing surfaces roads contains tar. Old and used tar contains significantly less volatiles than fresh tar as most of the volatiles evaporate over time. However, fresh volatiles may be exposed when tar-contaminated asphalt is broken open or heated during the recycling process. The health and air pollution risks associated with the heating of tar-contaminated asphalt limits the potential for the recycling of old asphalt.

8.2.3.3 Noise Impacts

People living or working along heavily used roads may be exposed to high levels of noise (refer to Section 8.2.5 for more detail) both during construction and operation. Long-term exposure may result in increased levels of stress, sleep disorders, fatigue, and various other health related problems.

8.2.3.4 Road safety

Currently there is a high risk of accidents associated with vehicular traffic and transport with the Warwick Precinct. The high levels of traffic, and the lack of suitable pedestrian space as a result of trading, result in congested pedestrian walkways and overflow onto the road. This together with a lack of adequate enforcement creates an unsafe environment for residents, pedestrians and commuters and results in the Johannes Nkosi/Market/Leopold/Warwick quadrant consistently having one of the highest accident rates in the City, approximately 471 accidents per annum. Coupled with this is the higher than normal pedestrian related accidents of 125 per annum, which is 2.2 times greater than the Metropolitan average. The costs of these accidents are estimated to be in the region of R18 million per annum.


Road safety may be affected temporarily during construction, with the reduction in the number of operational lanes; however the impact is expected to be minimal due to the minimal presence of pedestrians.

Implications and Management Impacts related to potential air pollution and noise impacts are discussed under Section 8.1.2 and 8.2.4 respectively. The proposed project will have the immediate positive impact on the area by significantly reducing the number of vehicles routing through the area (whose destination is not in the Warwick Junction). In conjunction with the inbound flyover currently under construction, the reduction of traffic through the quadrant of Market/Leopold/Warwick and Alice Street (Johannes Nkosi) is expected to reduce the number of accidents and potential conflicts that occur within the area, thus improving public safety of road users. It is envisaged that pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths will be improved as a result of this project and increased in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity. The reduced traffic congestion, conflicts and land gains will result in a more safe and efficient circulation of traffic.

The following mitigation measures are recommended: Ensure compliance with the Health Act and Occupational Health and Safety Act. Implement good housekeeping practices at the construction camp. Control speed and movement of construction vehicles. Undertake appropriate waste management practices. Undertake regular road maintenance to avoid unacceptable degradation of carriageway

and road shoulder that may create dangerous road conditions. Impose speed limits. Restrict pedestrian access through the project area. Provide adequate pedestrian walkways and crossings. Provide adequate roadside safety signage. Monitor road accident statistics, state of fencing and roadside vegetation.

8.2.4 Noise and Vibrations

Noise pollution can be a source of irritation and may impact on communication, concentration and sleep patterns. Long-term exposure may result in health related impacts. Noise from traffic is generally associated with braking, gear shifting and acceleration and is most noticeable when traffic is not free flowing. Frictional road noise is generated from the interaction of tyres with the road surface and is dependent on the composition, porosity and texture of the road surface, the speed at which the vehicle is travelling and the tyre quality of the vehicle. Frictional road noise is most noticeable during free flowing traffic conditions at moderate to high speeds. In all cases, the level of noise from vehicles is dependent on their size, technology, and maintenance levels. Traffic vibration is a low frequency disturbance that can be transmitted through the air or through the ground. Implications and Management The proposed project area is located within the Central Business District CBD of eThekwini Municipality and is characterised by high volumes of traffic that cut through the area. The


purpose of the project is to separate the through traffic from the activities of Warwick Junction through the construction of flyovers that take all through traffic over the highly congested quadrant of Market, Leopold, Warwick and Alice Street Johannes Nkosi Street. This will have the added advantage of encouraging vehicles to travel at a constant and efficient cruising speed. The project is expected to result in an improvement to road capacity in addition to minimising congestion. Noise levels may continue to increase over time due to gradual increases in traffic volumes on the road. Furthermore the proposed Flyover may generate additional traffic through the area, thereby increasing noise levels within the area. Vibrations resulting from bulk earthworks and compaction of base layers may create significant disturbances to nearby people and businesses along Leopold Street. The following mitigation measures are recommended:

Management of construction activities should be clearly outlined in the environmental

management plan to help reduce/mitigate or avoid noise impacts. Ensure compliance with applicable SABS noise standards. Implement a geometric design to minimise steep gradients and sharp turns. Encourage vehicles to travel at a constant, efficient cruising speed. Ensure appropriate road surface design and regular maintenance to minimise frictional

road noise and vibrations, especially for heavily used roads near sensitive receptors. Choice of machinery and time for construction activities has implications on level of noise

pollution. Locate concrete batching, asphalt, and crushing plants, laydown areas and construction

camps away from sensitive receptors. Restrict construction activities to reasonable working hours where near sensitive

receptors. Monitor noise levels in potential problem areas.

8.2.5 Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place

Aesthetics refer to the visual quality of an area as imparted by the physical properties of an area, such as scale, colour, texture, landform, level of enclosure, and in particular, the land use occurring within an area. Landscape character refers to an area’s intrinsic appeal and is not dependent on its visual quality but rather on its specific situation as determined by the following, its level of accessibility or remoteness, level of naturalness, lack of disturbance, current and potential use, rarity, cultural or historic importance, and potential value to people. The landscape character determines the extent of visual compatibility of the proposed development with its immediate surroundings. The spirit, or sense of place (Genius Loci), can be defined as the extent to which a person can recognise or recall a place as being distinct from other places and as having a vivid, or unique, or at least a recognizable character. It is indicates the intrinsic value that a community places on the aesthetic, therapeutic or emotional qualities and character of an area.5

5 Roads: Information Document for Environmental Assessment, (DEAT, 2003).


Aesthetics, landscape character and sense of place are all subjective concepts that are often influenced by individuals’ perceptions. Implications and Management Currently the Warwick Junction is typified by seemingly unrelated adjoining structures, on the one hand: the Berea Road Station, disparate markets, unfinished flyovers, ad hoc bridges, and bus shelters; and a series of raised walkways and open concourses which provide shelter and a variety of approaches to informal trading areas on the other. This is the place of trades and occupations not found elsewhere in the city. Here are gold ‘tooth fairies’, cigarette sellers, traditional herbalists, isangoma, children’s pinafore sellers, lime and mphempo traders. Live chickens, fruit, vegetables and other items for sale. There is a buzz but also quieter spots where people can meet and talk6. Elements of particular interest and quality within the area, in addition to the above include the Early Morning Market, Victoria Street Market and the English Market, the variety of street vendors and their stalls, the buildings of cultural and heritage significance as well as a cemetery. The proposed project will result in the construction of a flyover over the Warwick Precinct connecting Leopold Street to the Western Freeway. The purpose and need for the project has been described earlier, in addition to its relative merits (refer sections 3, 4, 8.2.1, etc). The proposed project is considered to be compatible with the surrounding landscape and is not likely to impact negatively on the existing visual quality or landscape character of the area; rather it is expected to improve the general environment through better use of the area. The project is expected to result in a reduction of traffic through the Warwick Precinct and associated land gains that will allow for the urban redesign of the appearance of the area to create a high quality environment for people. This will enhance the existing trading, transport and residential infrastructure and associated facilities as well as encouraging commercial, retail, residential and tourism initiatives within the area, thus providing broader impetus for the redevelopment of the surrounding area and CBD. The proposed flyover will be similar in construction and design to existing bridges in the area. There will be some additional urban design features (e.g. lighting, etc) to enhance the aesthetics of the structure and its placement in the area. The following mitigation measures are recommended: Signage to comply with the stipulations of the South African Manual for Outdoor

Advertising Control (SAMOAC). Implement appropriate design features to ensure visual appeal of the road and road

infrastructure such as the road surface, safety barriers, lighting columns, etc. Provide waste disposal facilities and enforce anti-littering campaigns. Provide assistance with cleaning and maintenance of roadside buildings soiled or stained

by air pollutants. 6 www.sarpn.org.za/documents/d0000875/docs/CBD%20DurbanWithSpecialEmphasisOnWarwickJunction.pdf


Monitor housekeeping, littering and illegal dumping. 8.2.6 Cultural Heritage Issues

Section 27 of the KwaZulu-Natal Heritage Act (No 10 of 1997) dealing with heritage resources management, requires that the Council of Amafa, at the earliest stages of initiating certain categories of development projects, be furnished with details regarding the location, nature and extent of the proposed development. The Amafa Council may require that an archaeological survey be carried out prior to any development being undertaken. The different categories of development are: a) Construction of a road, wall, power line, or similar form of linear development or barriers

exceeding 300m in length; b) Construction of a bridge or similar structure exceeding 50m in length; and c) Any development, or other activity which will change the character of an area of land or

water – i) Exceeding 10 000m2 in extent ii) Involving three or more existing erven or subdivision thereof; or iii) Involving three or more existing erven or subdivision thereof, which have been

consolidated within the past five years; or iv) The costs of which will exceed a sum set in terms of regulations; or v) Any other category of development provided for in the regulations

Implications and Management The proposed site is located within a built up urban area. Many of the buildings within the Warwick Precinct are listed on the Heritage register. Interestingly, the development of the area as a transport hub for the working poor became established as, during the period of segregation and apartheid, Indian and African-owned buses were denied access to the inner city. Warwick Avenue thus developed on the early fringe of the city and a wide range of otherwise unauthorised trading opportunities has proliferated around the junction7. The proposed development will not require demolishing of historically significant buildings. The proposed project is part of a broader plan for the area to rationalise the use of the Warwick Precinct and ensure that the area can be utilised in a more efficient way. This will include ensuring that the cultural potential of buildings within the area are utilised more effectively and realised. The report has been forwarded to AMAFA KwaZulu Natali, and their response is awaited. The following mitigation measures are recommended: Ensure that construction staff members are aware of the likelihood of heritage resources

being unearthed and of the scientific importance of such discoveries. Any heritage objects found are not to be moved without prior consultation with AMAFA

and all construction work should cease immediately. No structures older than sixty years are allowed to be demolished, altered or destructed

without a permit from AMAFA. 7 www.sarpn.org.za/documents/d0000875/docs/CBD%20DurbanWithSpecialEmphasisOnWarwickJunction.pdf


No activities are allowed within 50 metres of a site which contain Rock Art. 9 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND

PROPOSED MITIGATION 9.1 The Rating System

The following section comprises a summary table of the implications and mitigation of each environmental aspect. It also comprises a qualitative rating of the environmental impacts. The methodology used to rate the impacts was qualitative. Each category was divided into a number of different levels. These levels were then assigned various criteria as indicated below:

TABLE 1: Summary of quantifiers and qualifiers used for assessment purposes

Low The aspect has very little value in terms of its ecological importance e.g. a highly disturbed area is rated as low.

Medium The aspect has certain qualities which make it ecologically valuable.

Sensitivity of Aspect Magnitude or intensity of impact High

The aspect is near pristine and has numerous qualities which make it extremely ecologically valuable.

Short-term Impact restricted to construction (0-2 years). Medium-term Impact will continue throughout operation (2-50 years). Long-term Impacts will exist beyond the life of the road (>50 years)

Duration (time scale)

Permanent Impacts will have permanent potential Site The impact will be limited to within the site boundaries.

Local The impact will affect surrounding areas.

Regional The impact will affect areas far beyond the site boundary but limited to the Province of KwaZulu-Natal.

Geographic Spatial Scale

National The impact will affect areas far beyond the site boundary within the South Africa.

Low The impact will have a minimal effect on the environment. Medium The impact will result in a measurable deterioration in the environment.

Significance rating pre / post-mitigation (positive / negative) High The impact will cause a significant deterioration in the environment.

Definite (>90%) Probable (>70%) Possible (40%)

Degree of certainty

Unsure (<40%) n/a No mitigation necessary. Full Full mitigation/reversal of the impact is possible. Partial Only partial mitigation/reversal of the impact is possible

Mitigation

None No mitigation or reversal of the impact is possible


9.2 Planning and Design Phase

The following table outlines potential impacts gleaned from a process that included a review of available documentation, ground-truthed during the site visit, i.e. how, where and when the proposed development could interact and affect the environment significantly, and details what mitigation measures may be taken to counteract these impacts. The table should be read within the context of the body of the entire document. This section is limited to the Planning and Design phase of the proposed development.

TABLE 2: Summary of anticipated potential environmental impacts during Planning and Design Phase

Summary of Implications and Mitigation Assessment of Environmental Impacts Environmental

Aspect Potential Impacts Mitigation Significance

before Mitigation

Geographic Spatial Scale Duration

Mitigation &

Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation Planning Initiatives

Planning Frameworks for Warwick Precinct and the greater Durban CBD by eThekwini Municipality used in this assessment are as follows: Inner-city’s Urban Development Zone Warwick Junction Precinct Plan Warwick Junction and Warwick Revitalization

Programme These frameworks informed strategic plans that will be implemented in phases; these include the following; 1. Create a predominantly pedestrian preference

corridor in the precinct. 2. Rationalise, consolidate and organise the

public transport movements into a single integrated complex.

3. Consolidate and develop existing available land for heritage/social/commercial and residential activities

4. Connect the precinct to the city via non motorized transport (NMT) ways and via the CBD Public Transport Circulatory Systems.

The proposed project will link Leopold Street to the Western Freeway, thus by-passing the highly congested Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersections on the outbound carriageway and thereby improving traffic flow through the Warwick Precinct.

Construction of the Warwick Flyover inbound is underway, with completion expected in November 2009. The inbound flyover will serve as a link between the Western Freeway and Johannes Nkosi Street, also by-passing the Warwick Precinct. These two projects will allow for the planning initiatives of the Warwick Precinct to be realised.

The proposed project is part of a broader plan for the area to rationalise the use of the Warwick Precinct and ensure that the area can be utilised in a more efficient way.

High (+) Local/

regional Medium-

term

Full Mitigation Definite

High (+)

Identification The eThekwini Transport Authority's Vision is In conjunction with the inbound flyover High (+) Local Medium - Full High (+)




before Mitigation


Mitigation &

Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation of transport needs and demands

aligned to that of the National Department of Transport, which is to: Provide safe, reliable, effective, efficient and

fully integrated transport operations and infrastructure which would best meet the needs of freight and passenger customers at improving levels of service and cost in a fashion which supports government strategies for economic and social development, whilst being environmentally and economically sustainable.

This Vision is aligned to the national vision on land passenger transport, to “promote a safe, reliable, effective, efficient,

coordinated, integrated, and environmentally friendly land passenger transport system in South African urban and rural areas, and the southern African Region, managed in an accountable manner to ensure that people experience improving levels of mobility and accessibility”.

It is also aligned to the eThekwini IDP Vision which states that by 2020 eThekwini Municipality will enjoy the reputation of being Africa’s most caring and livable city, where all citizens live in harmony. This Vision will be achieved by growing its economy and meeting peoples’ needs so that all citizens enjoy a high quality of life with equal opportunities, in a city that they are truly proud of.

currently under construction; • The proposed outbound flyover will

significantly reduce the number of vehicles routing through the area.

• The reduction of traffic is expected to reduce the number of accidents and potential conflicts that occur within the area, thus saving human life, as well as the economy of the region.

• Reduced traffic also results in land gains, which can be utilized to enhance the pedestrian space and increase pedestrian amenity.

• It is envisaged that pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths will be improved and increased in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity within the Precinct.

• The reduced traffic congestion, conflicts and land gains will result in a more safe and efficient circulation of traffic, which is expected to facilitate the reorganization and rationalization of the public transport system and trading.

• The future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) will have better access to and from the City.

term Mitigation Definite

Existing Situation

The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes, result in the western gateway into and out of the City

The proposed project will link between the Western Freeway and Johannes Nkosi Street, thus by-passing the highly

High (-) Local/

Regional Medium -

term


High (+)




before Mitigation


Mitigation &

Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation having considerable congestion and delays to pedestrians and vehicles

The high levels of traffic and the lack of suitable pedestrian space as a result of trading, result in congested pedestrian walkways and overflow onto the road.

This creates an unsafe environment for residents, pedestrians and commuters and results in the Alice/Market/Leopold/Warwick quadrant consistently having one of the highest accident rates in the City.

The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes acts as a barrier to redevelopment and growth of the area.

In addition the area serves as a gateway into the City, and detracts from the many positives that the real City has to offer. This is important in view of the growing number of national and international events being staged in the city not least of which the much anticipated 2010 World Cup, and from a broader long term tourism perspective.

congested Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersections on the outbound carriageway and thereby improving traffic flow through the Warwick Precinct.

See above section Part closure of the nearby bus rank and

the taxi rank and their relocation to suitable location prior to construction commencing as included below under Social Aspects in the Construction Phase.


9.3 The Construction Phase

The following table outlines potential impacts gleaned from a process that included a review of available documentation, ground-truthed during the site visit, i.e. how, where and when the proposed development could interact and affect the environment significantly, and details what mitigation measures may be taken to counteract these impacts. The table should be read within the context of the body of the entire document. This section is limited to the construction phase of the proposed development.

TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION.



before Mitigation

Geographic Spatial Scale Duration Mitigation &

Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation Climate The corrosive nature of coastal climatic

conditions may impact on road infrastructure, including road side signage and safety barriers.

Rainfall intensity and run off rates may have implications on road safety, affecting the visibility and the condition of the road.

Smoke from burning activities could be wider spread on windy days especially when dust could be blown off site.

Excavations and other clearing activities should only be done during agreed working times and permitted weather conditions.

It is envisaged that runoff from the construction site will be directed into the existing Municipal drainage system. Mitigation measured for pollution of runoff should be addressed in the EMP.

The proposed flyover should be designed to minimise incidents of road surface flooding and improve road surface storm water drainage.

Low (-) Site Short-term Full

Mitigation Probable

Low (-)

Air Quality Fugitive dust can impact on roadside air quality during construction.

Dust and particulates from fuel combustion (mainly diesel), tyre, brake and road wear may be responsible for dirtying and staining of surfaces, objects and buildings immediately adjacent to the road.

Exhaust fumes from construction machinery, and potential smoke from cooking fires.

Odours from use of toilet ‘facilities’ other than provided facilities.

Ensure compliance with the Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act and the Air Quality Bill.

Ensure compliance with emission standards applicable to the area through which the road is aligned.

Guidelines that deal with the control of air pollution on site should be outlined in the Environmental Management Plan.

Monitoring of air pollution levels in potential problem areas should be undertaken.

Management (including storage, transport, handling and disposal) of hazardous substances used during construction.

Dust control measure should be included in

High (-) Local Short-term Partial

Mitigation Probable

Medium(-)




before Mitigation


Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation the EMP for construction phase.

Dust generating construction activities should be avoided during strong winds.

Soil loads in transit should be kept covered A suitable dust palliative should be applied if

dust levels rise above acceptable levels, either water or commercial dust suppressants

Regular servicing vehicles off site in order to limit gaseous emissions.

No open fires permitted on site Chemical toilets should be place on site and

must be maintained on a daily basis.

Geology

The water table is very shallow and tends to be perched on clay layers that may also cause artesian conditions in Warwick Avenue.

Excavations will be required for installation of piles and possibly relocation of underground services.

Strong water flows into open excavations below the water table will occur, causing sidewall collapse.

Layers of mixed fill cover natural ground surface in many places.

Settlement of fills on the estuarine sediments will occur, with its rate and amount being governed by the presence, thickness and compressibility of clay layers.

Contamination from spillage of petroleum products, spent engine oil and oil leaks from construction vehicle maintenance taking place on site.

Contamination through use of toilet ‘facilities’ other than provided facilities.

The design of the site drainage system should be adequate to control runoff from the development site in line with topographical features of the site.

Piled foundations relying on end bearing on bedrock will be necessary.

Rock shoes would be required to penetrate any boulders and key into a sloping or weathered, broken rock surface. The alternative of bored piles socketed into bedrock would also be suitable.

Rehabilitate all sites during construction including construction camps, stockpile area, temporary access and hauling routes, as soon as possible after the disturbance has ceased.

Contractor to exercise strict care in the disposal of construction waste, with proof of disposal at an approved site provided after offloading each waste load and this logged/registered.

Contaminated water must be contained & disposed off site at an approved landfill.

A suitable waste-handling contractor should dispose of waste from the oil interceptors and

Medium (-) Site Short-term Full

Mitigation Probable

Low (-)




before Mitigation


Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation provide Safe Disposal Certificates.

Cement, concrete and chemicals should be mixed on a concrete plinth and provisions should be made to contain spillages or overflows into the soil.

No vehicle maintenance to be allowed on site. If oil spills occur the contaminated soil should

be disposed of at an approved landfill site. Chemical toilets should be placed on site and

maintained on a daily basis. Subsoil and overburden in all construction and

lay down areas to be stockpiled separately and returned for backfilling in the correct soil horizon order.

Drainage and Hydrology

The proposed development is situated within an existing built up area where road infrastructure already exists. No water courses, wetlands or estuaries occur within the project location. Due to the nature and locality of the proposed project there is unlikely to any significant impacts on water resources within the immediate area

Ensure compliance with applicable legislation, such as the National Water Act, Water Services Act, Hazardous Substances Act, and Integrated Pollution and Waste Management Bill.

Storm water drainage systems must be able to control the volume, speed and location of runoff expected.

The site surface must be engineered and shaped in such a way that rapid and efficient evacuation of runoff is achieved.

Improve existing alignments and drainage systems.

Provide containment areas for potential pollutants at construction camps, refuelling depots, asphalt plants and concrete batching plants.

Appropriate waste management practices should be implemented during construction.

The transport, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous substances must be adequately controlled and managed.

Low (-) Site Short-term Full

Mitigation Probable

Low (+)




before Mitigation


Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation

Biodiversity Fauna & Flora

The proposed development is situated within an existing built up area where road infrastructure already exists. No areas of ecological diversity occur within the project location. Due to the nature and locality of the proposed project there is unlikely to any significant impacts on biodiversity within the area.

Existing roadside trees planted by eThekwini Parks Department between the Western Freeway outbound and inbound carriageway, will need to be removed.

Landscaping .is recommended where possible.

The Department should work closely in conjunction with Parks and Gardens / Architecture with regards landscaping, tree planting, grassing etc.

Relocation of palm trees and important floral specimens, shall be relocated in consultation with the Parks Department.

Low (-) Local long-term Partial

Mitigation Probable

Low (-)

Social Aspects

Land uses Overall disruptions to local businesses,

transport services, due to traffic and construction related noise, visual, and air pollution along Leopold Street.

Demolishing or temporary closure of a building utilised by SEDA eThekwini.

At least sections of the bus rank and the taxi rank will need to be temporarily closed as it fall within the construction footprint of the proposed outbound flyover.

Informal traders in located trading inside the taxi rank and the bus rank above-mentioned will also be affected.

The eThekwini Roads Provision Department need to consult with various organisations, departments, etc within the area. The following affected land users need to be consulted; − Informal Trade Department. − SEDA eThekwini − Public transport operators and affected

the affected taxi rank and bus rank. Provide clear and realistic information

regarding employment opportunities and other benefits for local communities in order to prevent unrealistic expectations.

The eThekwini Roads Provision Department are in consultations internally with the Informal Trade Department regarding informal traders. Affected street traders will need to be notified in writing about the above development.

Proof of consultation with the mentioned parties should be appended the Final EMP to be submitted to the DAEA for approval prior to commencement of construction.

Make use of local labour, materials, goods and services as far as possible.

High (-) Local Short-term Partial mitigation Probable

Medium (-)




before Mitigation


Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation

Infrastructure and Services There is likely to be temporary disruption of

infrastructure and services during the construction of the proposed Flyover, these will include electricity pylons, telecommunications, and underground pipes

Location of piles for the bridge is the only aspect of the development that may affect underground services.

Metrorail will not be affected by the proposed project, as the flyover terminates just before Russell Street, while the railway lines are located further north-east.

Minimise alignments that would interfere with existing and potential future infrastructure and services.

Keep construction related disturbances to a minimum.

Consult with affected service providers regarding impacts on access to infrastructure and services and alternatives.

Consult with affected communities or businesses prior to foreseeable disruptions, for example notifying residents of a temporary severance of water supply.

Provide access points to infrastructure and services.

Provide conduits / ducts / culverts for other infrastructure and services.

Monitor complaints by the public. The EMP should include a complaints register.

Medium (-) Local Short-term Full

Mitigation Probable

Low (-)

Traffic It is not envisaged that Leopold Street and

other roads in the vicinity will be closed during the construction of the outbound flyover.

There will be reduction in the number of operating lanes on Leopold Street. This may result in traffic backing up especially during peak hours.

Increased volume of construction vehicles on the roads may lead to increased wear and tear of roads in the vicinity of the

No traffic detours and total closure of roads are envisaged are envisaged.

The Traffic Department will need to finalize the lane markings and the final traffic layout will need to be appended to the final EMP.


Provide slow lanes, paved shoulders and safe crossings where necessary.

Should closure of any roads become necessary at any point during construction, the

High (-)

Regional

Short-term

Partial Mitigation Probable

Medium (-)




before Mitigation


Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation proposed site.

Access on Russell Street willmay also be affected. This access road to Johannes Nkosi Street may need to be closed while construction in the vicinity is underway, it shall however not remain closed for the duration of the entire construction period.

Limited impacts on pedestrians are expected, as Leopold Street and the N3 freeway are generally free of pedestrians and taxi stops.

Residents and business located south of the road have access via a separation off-ramp. This access will not be affected by construction activities.

public must be notified at least 14days before closure.

Provide clear and realistic information regarding alternative accesses for local communities and businesses in order to prevent unrealistic expectations.

Consult with local communities regarding location of construction camps, access and hauling routes, and other likely disturbances during construction.

Adequate warning signs of hazardous working areas.

Construction programme should be appended to the Final EMP to be submitted to the DAEA for approval prior to commencement of construction.

Health & Safety Construction activities are by their very

nature dangerous. Danger of construction related injuries. Open fires in construction camp could

result in accidents. Safety of workers and general public must

be ensured. Poor waste management practices and

unhygienic conditions at temporary ablution facilities could cause breed diseases.

Standing water due to inadequate storm water drainage systems, inadequate waste management practices, pose a health hazard to providing breeding grounds for disease vectors such as mosquitoes, flies and snails.

The use of hazardous chemicals in the construction of a road can pose potential environmental, health and safety risks.

Road safety may be affected during

Ensure compliance with the Health Act and Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Implement good housekeeping practices at the construction camp.

Strict health & safety measures to be implemented and audited on a regular basis.

Secure enclosed construction site. Use of reputable Contractors. Adequate warning signs of hazardous working

areas. Excavations to be clearly demarcated and

barriers (not just danger tape) erected to protect pedestrians from open trenches.

Workers should be thoroughly trained in using dangerous equipment.

Workers have the right to refuse work in unsafe conditions.

Undertake appropriate waste management practises.

Control speed and movement of construction vehicles

High (-) Site & Local

Short-term Partial Mitigation Possible

Low (-)




before Mitigation


Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation construction, with the reduction in the number of operational lanes; however the impact is expected to be minimal due to the minimal presence of pedestrians.

Undertake appropriate waste management practices.

Noise and Vibrations Use of heavy vehicles and equipment may

generate high levels of noise for the duration of the construction period.

Vibrations resulting from bulk earthworks and compaction of base layers may create significant disturbances to nearby people and businesses along Leopold Street.

Disturbance from after hours work.

Ensure compliance with applicable SABS noise standards.

Management of construction activities should be clearly outlined in the environmental management plan to help reduce/mitigate or avoid noise impacts

Locate concrete batching, asphalt, and crushing plants, laydown areas and construction camps away from sensitive receptors.

Restrict construction activities to reasonable working hours where near sensitive receptors.

Keep adjacent landowners informed of unusually noisy activities planned.

Ensure that machinery in a good state of maintenance.

Silencers must be fitted and maintained to all machinery on site.

Monitor noise levels in potential problem areas.

High (-) Local Short-term Partial

Mitigation Probable

Medium (-)

Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place The presence of heavy duty vehicles and

equipment, temporary structures at construction camps, stockpiles, asphalt may result in impacts on aesthetics and landscape character.

Indiscriminate disposal of rubbish, construction waste and rubble, excavated material and off cuts could increase negative visual impact.

Increase in littering on site from labour

Storage areas should be properly fenced off. All domestic solid waste should be collected

from a central point of disposal and fed into the municipal waste collection system.

Contractor to exercise strict care in the disposing of construction waste, with proof of disposal at a proper site provided after offloading each waste load and this logged/registered.

Identification of suitable waste disposal site with enough capacity to hold additional waste to be produced by the proposed road

Medium (-) Local Short-term Partial Mitigation Definite

Medium Low (-)




before Mitigation


Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation force and construction activities. construction activities.

Use of recycled material is encouraged especially in the upgrading of existing road.

Guidelines regarding management of waste on site should be outlined in the environmental management plan.

Cluster construction activities on site on a specific area to avoid “sprawl”.

Unwanted material and litter should be removed on a daily basis.

Workers Conduct Construction workers on site disrupting

adjacent land uses by creating noise, generating litter, & possible loitering.

Ensure strict control of labourers, minimising

working hours to normal working times, control littering, and ensure no overnight accommodation is provided.

Low (-) Local Short-term


Low (-)

Employment Generation The development will provide employment

opportunities for local people during construction.

Expectations regarding new employment would be high especially among the unemployed individuals in the area.

Labour gathering at the site for work could be a safety and security issue, and should be avoided.

The training of unskilled or previously unemployed persons will add to the skills base of the area.

The use of labour intensive construction

measures should be used where appropriate. Employ local (unskilled) labour if possible. Training of labour to benefit individuals beyond

completion of the project. Recruitment of labours should take place off-

site. The contractual documentation should ensure

that at least 70% of all labour is from surrounding communities.

Medium (+) Local Short-term Partial

Mitigation Probable

High (+)

Archaeological and Cultural Characteristics

The proposed development will not require demolishing of historically significant buildings.

Details of the proposed project have been forwarded to AMAFA KwaZulu Natali, and the above comments shall be confirmed by AMAFA.

The proposed project is part of a broader plan for the area to rationalise the use of

Ensure that construction staff members are aware of the likelihood of heritage resources being unearthed and of the scientific importance of such discoveries.


AMAFA must be contacted should any

N/a N/a N/a N/a N/a




before Mitigation


Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation the Warwick Precinct and ensure that the area can be utilised in a more efficient way. This will include ensuring that the cultural potential of buildings within the area are utilised more effectively and realised

heritage resources or objects, defined in the Act, be discovered in the course of development activities and all development should cease until further notice.





9.4 The Operational Phase

The following table outlines potential impacts gleaned from a process that included a review of available documentation, ground-truthed during the site visit, i.e. how, where and when the proposed development could interact and affect the environment significantly, and details what mitigation measures may be taken to counteract these impacts. The table should be read within the context of the body of the entire document. This section is limited to the operation phase of the proposed development. TABLE 4: SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DURING OPERATION.



before Mitigation


Mitigation &

Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation

Climate The corrosive nature of coastal climatic

conditions may impact on road infrastructure, including road side signage and safety barriers.

Provide warning signs and suggested speed limits during dangerous conditions.

Regular road side maintenance.

Low (-) Site Medium-

term


Low (+)

Air Quality

Air pollutants can be inhaled directly from the air, or ingested from touching surfaces or objects where pollutants have settled.

Air pollution may increase over time due to gradual increases in traffic volumes on the road.

The impacts on air quality to sensitive receptors in proximity to Johannes Nkosi Street area may improve as a result of the proposed project since there will be a separation of traffic through the area.

Ensure compliance with the Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act and the Air Quality Bill.

Ensure compliance with emission standards applicable to the area through which the road is aligned.

Enforce speed limits and regulate roadworthiness of vehicles during operation of the road.

Monitoring of air pollution levels in potential problem areas should be undertaken.

Medium (-) Local Medium

Term

Partial Mitigation Unsure

Low (-)

Drainage & Hydrology

Pollutants settling on the road surface may be washed off during rain as runoff.

Runoff from roads produces a highly variable discharge in terms of volume and quality.

Ensure compliance with applicable legislation, such as the National Water Act, Water Services Act, Hazardous Substances Act, and Integrated Pollution and Waste Management Bill.

Design of site drainage system should be adequate to control runoff from development site in line with topographical features of the site.

Appropriate waste management practices should be implemented during operation of the road.

low (-) Local Long-term

Partial Mitigation Definite

Low (-)




before Mitigation


Mitigation &

Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation Social Aspects

Land Use In conjunction with the inbound flyover currently under construction: The proposed flyover would have positive

impacts both on a local and regional context in terms of road improvements and an improved transportation regime.

Reduced traffic results in land gains, which can be utilized to enhance the pedestrian space and increase pedestrian amenity.


The largest benefits will be to individuals living or working within the area.

The proposed development is expected to bring about positive economic benefits in the medium to long term.

Local road side businesses, public transport, education and health facilities, etc are likely to benefit from the proposed project.

It is envisaged that as a result of this project, pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths will be improved and increased in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity. This will improve the safety of pedestrians while making markets more accessible.

Access into and through the area (to destinations closer to the coast or further inland) will be improved.

The future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) will have better access to and from the City.

SPECIAL EVENTS MANAGEMENT such as extra policing and barriers to control movement of pedestrians during peak traffic flows

High (+) Local Long-term

No Mitigation Required

High (+)




before Mitigation


Mitigation &

Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation The proposed development is likely to impact

positively on commercial activities within the project area and surrounds through improved access and rationalisation of the area available for commercial activities.

Traffic In conjunction with the inbound flyover currently under construction: Significant reduction in the number of vehicles

routing through the area, whose destination is not in the Warwick Junction.

The reduction of traffic through the quadrant of Market/Leopold/Warwick and Johannes Nkosi Street is expected to reduce the number of accidents and potential conflicts that occur within the area, thus saving human life.


The reduced traffic congestion, conflicts and land gains result in a more safe and efficient circulation of traffic, which is expected to facilitate the reorganization and rationalization of the public transport system and trading.

The future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) will have better access to and from the City. Construction of the inbound flyover will be completed in November 2009 and the date of completion for the outbound is May 2010.

No mitigation measures required High (+) Regional Long-term

No Mitigation Required

High (+)

Health & Safety The reduction of traffic through the quadrant of

Market/Leopold/Warwick and Johannes Nkosi Street is expected to reduce the number of

Ensure compliance with the Health Act and

Occupational Health and Safety Act. Undertake regular road maintenance to

avoid unacceptable degradation of

High (+) Local Long-term


High (+)




before Mitigation


Mitigation &

Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation accidents and potential conflicts that occur within the area, thus improving public safety of road users.

It is envisaged that pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths will be improved as a result of this project and increased in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity.

The reduced traffic congestion, conflicts and land gains will result in a more safe and efficient circulation of traffic.

carriageway and road shoulder that may create dangerous road conditions.

Impose speed limits through urban areas. Provide adequate pedestrian walkways and

crossings. Provide adequate roadside safety signage. Monitor road accident statistics, state of

fencing and roadside vegetation

Noise Pollution Noise pollution caused by existing road traffic,

and additional traffic with new flyover. Expected increase in noise due to increased

traffic is not expected to impact significantly on the current ambient noise levels.

Vibrations are much less likely to be a cause of disturbance than noise levels, but it may become a problem when vehicles, especially heavy vehicles, travel over irregular road surfaces in close proximity to sensitive roadside receptors

Ensure compliance with applicable SABS noise standards.

Encourage vehicles to travel at a constant, efficient cruising speed.

Ensure appropriate road surface design and regular maintenance to minimise frictional road noise and vibrations, especially for heavily used roads near sensitive receptors.

Regulate roadworthiness of vehicles. Monitor noise levels in potential problem

areas.

Medium (-)

Local

Long-term

Partial Mitigation Possible

Low -Medium (-)

Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place The proposed project is considered to be

compatible with the surrounding landscape and is not likely to impact negatively on the existing visual quality or landscape character of the area; rather it is expected to improve the general environment through better use of the area.

The Flyover will increase the quality of the tourism experience being offered, by enhancing the sense of place of the project

The proposed flyover will be similar in construction and design to existing bridges in the area. There will be some additional urban design features (e.g. lighting, etc) to enhance the aesthetics of the structure and its placement in the area.

Signage to comply with the stipulations of the South African Manual for Outdoor Advertising Control (SAMOAC).

Implement appropriate design features to ensure visual appeal of the road and road infrastructure such as the road surface, safety barriers, lighting columns, etc.

Low (+) local Long-term


Med (+)




before Mitigation


Mitigation &

Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation area that originally attracted tourists (it is anticipated that the project will result in improved safety and aesthetics).

The project is expected to result in a reduction of traffic through the area and associated land gains that will allow for the urban redesign of the appearance of the area to create a high quality environment for people. This will enhance the existing trading, transport and residential infrastructure and associated facilities as well as encouraging commercial, retail, residential and tourism initiatives within the area, thus providing broader impetus for the redevelopment of the surrounding area and CBD.

During design, retain roadside trees wherever possible, for example by widening the road to the one side only.

Provide waste disposal facilities and enforce anti-littering campaigns.

Provide assistance with cleaning and maintenance of roadside buildings soiled or stained by air pollutants.

Monitor housekeeping, littering and illegal dumping.


Details of the proposed project have been forwarded to AMAFA KwaZulu Natali;

Ensure that construction staff members are aware of the likelihood of heritage resources being unearthed and of the scientific importance of such discoveries.


AMAFA must be contacted should any heritage resources or objects, defined in the Act, be discovered in the course of development activities and all development should cease until further notice.




N/a N/a N/a N/a N/a




before Mitigation


Mitigation &

Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation

9.5 The Decommissioning Phase

For the purpose of this report, possible impacts related to decommissioning phase have not been considered in detail. It is recommended that the details pertaining to decommissioning phase, when required, should be looked at separately from this assessment by the Environmental Practitioner to be appointed specifically for that phase. Impacts that may result from the decommissioning have been listed in the Part F Section 5 of the Basic Assessment Form.


9.6 Cumulative Environmental Impacts

Cumulative Impacts are impacts that result from the incremental impact of the proposed development activity on a common resource when added to the impacts of other past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future activities. Cumulative impacts are identified, predicted in the same level of detail as the impacts discussed above. This information contained within this section has been referenced from the Report to the Committee (2005) prepared for the Warwick Junction Revitalisation Programme. TABLE 5: SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED POTENTIAL CUMULATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Summary of Implications and Mitigation Assessment of Environmental Cumulative Impacts Environmental


before Mitigation


Duration Mitigation & Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation Road Infrastructure Development for 2010 World cup

The objective of the inbound and outbound flyovers is to have through traffic in and out of the city to by-pass the precinct, provide efficiency in terms of travel time, safety, ease congestion and improve amenity of Warwick Precinct, for the 2010 World Cup.

CONSTRICTION PERIOD FOR THE OUTBOUND

FLYOVER IN TIME FOR THE 2010 WORLD CUP

IS CRITICAL.

High (-) Site/ Local Medium-

term


High (+)

The Removal of Extraneous Traffic and Increasing Pedestrian Amenity

In conjunction wit the Warwick Flyover Inbound currently under construction. The reduction of traffic through the quadrant of

Market/Leopold/Warwick and Alice from currently 90 000 veh/12 hour would result in reduced number of accidents and potential conflicts, thus saving human life as well as the economy of the region.

In addition the barriers that the sea of traffic currently creates is removed, thus allowing closer interaction between the various land parcels and allowing an integrated development approach to the area and improving the overall quality of life.

Reduced traffic also results in land gains, which can be utilized to enhance the pedestrian space and increase pedestrian amenity. It is envisaged that pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths would be improved and increased in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity.

Further, for future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) better access to and from the

Refer to tables above High (+) Site/ Local Long-term Full

Mitigation Definite

High (+)




before Mitigation



Significance after

Mitigation City would be achieved.

The Rationalisation and Reorganisation of Public Transport and Trade

In order to promote the National imperative of promoting public transport, it is essential to provide a safe, efficient, reliable, accessible, convenient and co-ordinated public transport system.

The proposal to create a public transport zone and to create a modal interchange in and around the Berea Station and to confine all the public transport to this zone goes a long way to achieving some of the goals of a good public transport system.

Integration with the proposed Inner City Public Transport Circulatory System ensures comprehensive Inner City public transport coverage.

An integrated and co-ordinated public transport system allows for the implementation of through ticketing systems and of public transport priority systems, like exclusive public transport lanes, which further enhances the attractiveness of public transport.

The rationalization of the informal trade as part of the public transport reorganization is testimony to the interdependency of these two activities. This rationalization is essential to maintain the long term sustainability of this activity as well as to enhance the general attractiveness and aesthetic appeal of the area.


Mitigation Definite

High (+)

The Rationalisation and Revitalisation of Land Uses

The expected land gains as well as the reduction of traffic through the area allows for the area to be redeveloped and revitalized in a co-ordinated and integrated manner, ensuring connectivity between the various land uses, greater pedestrian/open spaces as well as a general urban redesign of the appearance of the area to create a high quality environment for people.

This will enhance the existing trading, transport and residential infrastructure and associated facilities as well as encouraging commercial, retail and residential initiatives within the area, thus providing broader


Mitigation Definite

High (+)




before Mitigation



Significance after

Mitigation impetus for the redevelopment of the surrounding area and CBD. − Creation of a tourist flagship project (East

Coast/African Experience commercial zone) − Improved quality of life − Improved Gateway to City − Improved access to cater for international events e.g.

WC2010, ICCD Conferences etc. Linking this Precinct to the City

The spatial distribution of current initiatives such as the ICC, the Point Waterfront and the future sport and recreation precinct around the stadium suggests that the Warwick precinct with its strong African culture would give a spatial balance to the city and begs the need for connectivity.

The current initiatives around the People Mover and an CBD motorised circulatory system would provide this connectivity especially if integrated through information based non-motorised ways which might include footways, cycle/rickshaw ways, etc.


Mitigation Definite

High (+)

Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place

The proposed flyover will be similar in construction and design to existing bridges in the area.

There will be some additional urban design features (e.g. lighting, etc) to enhance the aesthetics of the structure and its placement in the area.

Refer to tables above Medium (-) Local Long-term Full

Mitigation Definite

High (+)


9.7 Assessment of The No-Go Option

The following table outlines potential impacts associated with the ‘No-go’ Option. The table should be read within the context of the body of the entire document. TABLE 6: SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE NO-GO OPTION.



before Mitigation


Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation Climate No obvious impacts n/a

Air Quality Air quality would remain the same. No impacts on sensitive receptors during construction

None Medium (-) Local Medium (-)

Geology No obvious impacts n/a Drainage & Hydrology

No obvious impacts n/a

Social Aspects

Land Use The Warwick flyover inbound although critical, on its own would

serve limited purpose in addressing the issues of vehicular congestion in the Warwick Precinct and the associated problems. Positive cumulative impacts of the two flyovers in operation as outlined throughout the report will not realised.

The Warwick Precinct would remain fragmented with high volumes of traffic, pedestrians and commercial activity competing for limited space.

The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and pedestrian volumes will continue to act as a barrier to redevelopment and growth of the area.

The fragmentation of activities, in particular the public transport ranks, will remain inefficient, inconvenient and unsafe.

Lack of defined and dedicated trading space to cater for demand will continue to result in trading operating at undesirable locations, exacerbating problems of congestion and urban degradation.

Private sector participation and investment will continue to be inhibited, which in turn inhibits the possible redevelopment of the area to be able to realize its full potential, including that of tourism.

The area serves as a gateway into the City, and currently detracts

None High (-) Local Long-term High (-)




before Mitigation


Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation from the many positives that the real City has to offer. This will impact on the growing number of national and international events being staged in the city not least of which the much anticipated 2010 World Cup, and the broader long term tourism perspective,.

Traffic The number of conflicting usages and the high vehicular and

pedestrian volumes, will continue to result in the western gateway out of the City having considerable congestion and delays to pedestrians and vehicles

The high risk of accidents to traffic users and pedestrians will remain.

Access to future developmental and event needs (Soccer World Cup 2010) to and from the City will continue to be a problem.


Health & Safety The high levels of traffic and the lack of suitable pedestrian space

as a result of trading, will continue to result in congested pedestrian walkways and overflow onto the road.

The routing of heavy vehicles through this area results in the problem of ‘run-way’ trucks and the potential need for an arrester bed for runaways

This together with a lack of adequate enforcement will continue to create an unsafe environment for residents, pedestrians and commuters that result in the Alice/Market/Leopold/Warwick quadrant consistently having one of the highest accident rates in the City,

The costs of these accidents are estimated to be in the region of R18 million per annum.



None Medium (-) Local Long-term Medium (-)

Aesthetics, Landscape Character and Sense of Place Aesthetics, landscape character and Sense of Place is likely to

deteriorate as more land uses compete for limited space, leading to visual degradation in terms of congestion, litter, and lack of

None Medium (-) Local Long-term Medium (-)




before Mitigation


Certainty

Significance after

Mitigation pedestrian space.


No obvious impacts n/a


10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) will guide the environmentally sensitive construction of the proposed construction of Warwick Avenue flyover outbound and ensure efficient lines of communication between the Project Manager, Resident Engineer, Contractor and Environmental Consultant. The purpose of the EMP is to ensure that the activities onsite are undertaken in a responsible non-detrimental manner. The objectives of the EMP are to: Provide a pro-active, feasible and practical working tool to enable the measurement and

monitoring of environmental performance on site. Guide and control the implementation of the findings and recommendations of the Basic

Assessment conducted for the project. Ensure that the construction and operational phases of the project continues within the

principles of Integrated Environmental Management. Detail specific actions deemed necessary to assist in mitigating the environmental impact

of the project. Ensure that the safety recommendations are complied with.

11 CONCLUSION

In view of the Municipality’s immediate goals, the proposed outbound flyover is a component of eThekwini Municipality’s capital projects planned to improved road infrastructure and transportation network across the city in time for the 2010 Soccer World Cup, for which eThekwini will be one of the host cities. eThekwini Municipality have realised an urgent need to alleviate vehicular congestion in the Warwick Precinct, the gateway to the City. In addition alternative routes were required for traffic entering the city whose destination is not the Warwick Precinct, but rather the beach front and areas north of eThekwini. The “sister” project, Warwick flyover inbound is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in November 2009, while the outbound flyover should be completed in May 2010 in time for the soccer tournament commencing in June. On a long term basis the proposed project is part of a bigger initiative to create a precinct whereby the various lands uses that characterise the area can interact together in a safe and attractive manner. In conjunction with the inbound flyover currently under construction, the proposed outbound flyover will result in an immediate positive impact on the area by significantly reducing the number of vehicles routing through the area (whose destination is not in the Warwick Junction). The reduction of traffic through the quadrant of Market/Leopold/Warwick and Johannes Nkosi Street is expected to reduce the number of accidents and potential conflicts that occur within the area, thus saving human life, as well as the economy of the region. Reduced traffic also results in land gains, which can be utilized to enhance the pedestrian space and increase pedestrian amenity. It is envisaged that pedestrian sidewalks and footpaths will be improved and increased in size together with general urban design elements to create an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity. The proposed project is expected to facilitate closer interaction between the various land parcels and to allow an integrated development approach to the area thereby improving the overall quality of life. The reduced traffic congestion, conflicts and land gains result in a


more safe and efficient circulation of traffic, which is expected to facilitate the reorganization and rationalization of the public transport system and trading. Although the benefits of the proposed project are considerable, impacts during construction, although short term, are likely to be significant, if suggested mitigation measures are not implemented. The proposed outbound flyover is likely to result in disruption to traffic and businesses, increased noise levels, air quality and health related impacts during the approximate 20 month construction period. A number of lanes will remain open on Leopold Street to allow traffic flow. No traffic detours are envisaged. A building utilised by SEDA eThekwini located between Market Street and Russell Street will need to be closed during construction. The building is not older than 60 years. AMAFA has been contacted for comment regarding any items of archaeological significance that may be affected by the proposed development. The proposed alignment of the flyover will not affect the railway lines along Leopold Street. The bus rank located on the north-eastern quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection and the taxi rank located on the north-western quadrant of Market/Leopold/N3 Western Freeway intersection will however need to be temporarily closed as they fall within the construction footprint of the proposed outbound flyover as the flyover terminates just before Russell Street, while the railway lines are located further north-east. Preliminary investigations confirmed that the proposed route is the only feasible alternative to meet the objectives of eThekwini Municipality. eThekwini Roads Provision and the Traffic Department are in consultation with the affected stakeholders. The report has advised that all written agreements between the affected parties be appended to the final EMP to be submitted to the DAEA for approval prior to commencement of construction. The basic assessment process has revealed that most of the impacts that are predicted to occur will be of short term duration and will be able to be mitigated to an acceptable level. Mitigation measures have been recommended during construction and operation to control traffic and related impacts to minimise disruptions to adjacent uses and road users, Mitigation measures will need to be followed to ensure adequate management of the surrounding physical and social environment.

12 RECOMMENDATIONS

It is recommended that the proposed Warwick Flyover Inbound Project should be granted approval since it will result in a number of positive impacts in the long term. Impacts during construction are likely to be significant and therefore will need to be managed carefully. The following conditions should be met by the Applicant: An Environmental Management Plan – should be compiled and submitted for approval to

DAEA, DWAF and eThekwini Municipality- Environmental Branch prior to construction. The EMP should include mitigation measures for construction and operation activities indicated in the Basic Assessment Report.

Written agreements between eThekwini Roads Provision and the Traffic Department and the affected land users, namely, Metrorail, Informal Traders, Taxi Operators and SEDA eThekwini must be obtained prior to commencement of constriction phase.


Auditing during construction – An environmental auditor to be appointed to audit compliance with the EMP during the course of the construction phase.

13 REFERENCES

Camp KGT 1997. The Bio-Resource Groups of KwaZulu-Natal. Cedara Report N/A/95/32. KZN Department of Agriculture. Pietermaritzburg.

DEAT (2005) Guideline 3: General Guide to the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2005, Integrated Environmental Guideline Management Series. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT), Pretoria.

eThekwini Transport Authority / Itrump (2005) Warwick Junction Revitalisation Programme, Report For Committee, ETA 20/05 Ref No. 15/1/6/6/2/2

Roads, Information Document for Environmental Assessment, Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, December 2003, First Edition.

www.sarpn.org.za/documents/d0000875/docs/CBD%20DurbanWithSpecialEmphasisOnWarwickJunction.pdf

proposed warwick flyover outbound: between leopold street ... · the proposed project will link the...

Documents