proposed ballot issues
DESCRIPTION
Proposed Ballot Issues. Bannockburn HOA Covenants. Roofing and Fencing. Current roofing criteria for asphalt shingles is obsolete Additional proposals address common variance requests Attempt to better clarify property boundary specifications for fencing. Roofing. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Proposed Ballot IssuesBannockburn HOA Covenants
![Page 2: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Roofing and Fencing
Current roofing criteria for asphalt shingles is obsolete
Additional proposals address common variance requests
Attempt to better clarify property boundary specifications for fencing
![Page 3: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
RoofingRemove new cedar wood shake roofs
Not permitted by Douglas CountyKeep slate, ceramic, or cement tile shinglesChange asphalt shingle wording
laminated three-dimensional 30 year warranty
Add metal rib metal roofing panels 26-guage steel ¾” trapezoidal ribs on 9” centers Coatings and paint 40 year warranty
![Page 4: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Road Frontage Fencing
Keep Stone Split rail Post and pole Post and rail
Add Vinyl ranch style fencing with 2, 3, or 4 rails Clarification of road frontage to mean within 25
ft of the property line that faces the road
![Page 5: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Residential Lot Boundary Fencing
Keep Any type allowed for road frontage Woven wire or barbless wire No electrical fences unless attached to the
inside of an otherwise approved fenceAdd
Clarification of residential lot boundary to mean within 25 ft of the property line that does not face a road
![Page 6: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Results of Animal Survey
![Page 7: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Participation
110 returned surveysNot all sections were completed for each
survey
![Page 8: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Horses
108
1
Horses YesHorses No
![Page 9: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Donkeys
90
18
Donkeys yesDonkeys No
![Page 10: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Alpacas
88
20
Alpacas YesAlpacas No
![Page 11: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Beef Animals
62
48 Beef YesBeef No
![Page 12: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Goats
86
24
Goats YesGoats No
![Page 13: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Chickens
87
23
Chickens Yes
![Page 14: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Conclusions
There appears to be broad support for increasing the variety of animals permitted
Although beef animals are currently allowed, there is not significant current support
![Page 15: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Preferred Number of Animals
Horses Donkeys Alpacas Beef Goats Chickens0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1
20 22
48
24 23
45
54
24
50
41
3
43
23
33
9
28
4
14
8
15 14
30
37 01 to 34 to 56 to1011+
![Page 16: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Conclusions
Support for 5 large animals is around 60% Horses Donkeys Alpacas Beef Goats
Support for 10 chickens is around 60%
![Page 17: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Proposed Animal Changes
Allow 5 large animals per lot Each large animal variety to be included will
then be voted on separatelyAllow 10 chickens per lot Increase corral size to 3000 sq ft Increase allowable outbuildings to 3 with no
change in combined size of 3000 sq ft
![Page 18: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Voting PercentagesChange the percentage of votes required to
amend covenants from 66 2/3rds% to 51%Based on feedback from other covenant
committees and this committee’s experience Currently a minority of homeowners determine
policy for the majority Achieving 66 2/3rds% positive votes for any
issue requires nearly full participation of homeowners
Historically it has been difficult to get this level of participation
![Page 19: Proposed Ballot Issues](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681639c550346895dd49754/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Questions & CommentsThank You!