proposall on streamlliiniing assessment framework of ... · assessment framework of assessment...
TRANSCRIPT
1
22 October 201122 October 2011
Proposal on StreamliningProposal on Streamlining
Assessment Framework ofAssessment Framework of
Independent Enquiry Study ofIndependent Enquiry Study of
Liberal StudiesLiberal Studies
PPrriinncciipplleess ooff SSttrreeaammlliinniinngg
Should not change the design principles of the curriculum
and assessment framework
Uphold the spirit of IES – integral part of learning & teaching
and essential component of the public assessment, with due consideration given to the interests and benefit of students
Streamlining through reducing administrative work in conducting the assessments and submitting marks, to make
IES more manageable for students and teachers but not at
the expense of essential learning elements
2
WWhhyy SSttrreeaammlliinniinngg??
Feedback from schools through principals, teachers, district coordinators, CDC-HKEAA Committees and
various studies
Major concerns:
Students’ and teachers’ workload
No. of subjects with SBA increases to 21 in 2014 HKDSE
Streamlining proposals with a view to addressing critical
concerns, including workload issues, in a timely manner while upholding the spirit of SBA for the benefit of
students
3
WWhhyy SSttrreeaammlliinniinngg??
Workload issue:
administrative and professional
• Student work
collection
• Mark submissions
• Handling of irregularity
cases, etc.
• Marking standardization
• Implementation of
Process assessment
• Mark adjustment, etc.
4
130130130130 35.0%35.0%35.0%35.0%5 (Strongly Agree)5 (Strongly Agree)5 (Strongly Agree)5 (Strongly Agree)
5
TeachersTeachers’’ ViewsViews
123123123123
46464646
52525252
20202020
NNNN
33.2%33.2%33.2%33.2%4444
12.4%12.4%12.4%12.4%3333
14.0%14.0%14.0%14.0%2222
5.4%5.4%5.4%5.4%1 (Strongly Disagree)1 (Strongly Disagree)1 (Strongly Disagree)1 (Strongly Disagree)
%%%%Level of AgreementLevel of AgreementLevel of AgreementLevel of Agreement
mean:3.78
Almost 70%70%70%70% of the teachers agreed or strongly agreed that
combination of the Process assessment with Task assessment
can be considered
Q.9: I agree that combinationcombinationcombinationcombination ofofofof the Processthe Processthe Processthe Process assessment withassessment withassessment withassessment with TaskTaskTaskTask
assessmentassessmentassessmentassessment can be considered
122122122122 32.8%32.8%32.8%32.8%5 (Strongly Agree)5 (Strongly Agree)5 (Strongly Agree)5 (Strongly Agree)
6
TeachersTeachers’’ ViewsViews
126126126126
68686868
43434343
13131313
NNNN
33.9%33.9%33.9%33.9%4444
18.3%18.3%18.3%18.3%3333
11.6%11.6%11.6%11.6%2222
3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%1 (Strongly Disagree)1 (Strongly Disagree)1 (Strongly Disagree)1 (Strongly Disagree)
%%%%Level of AgreementLevel of AgreementLevel of AgreementLevel of Agreement
mean:3.81
Nearly 70%70%70%70% of the teachers agreed or strongly agreed that integration of
the work of the three stages of assessment can be considered
Q.10: I agree that integrationintegrationintegrationintegration ofofofof thethethethe work of the three stages ofwork of the three stages ofwork of the three stages ofwork of the three stages of
assessmentassessmentassessmentassessment can be considered
WWhhyy 22001144??
Earliest year of implementation of proposed changes to the IES would be 2014 HKDSE
because schools have already started IES for the 2013 cohort
Any streamlining should not affect schools and students for whom IES Task and Process have already started
Experiences gained and review upon the completion of implementation of the 2012 HKDSE
would help inform the way forward
7
CuCurrrreenntt AsAssseessssmmeenntt FFrraammeewwoorrkk
1
1
1
No. of
Marks to be
submitted
for Task
(50%)
1
1
1
No. of
Marks to be
submitted
for Process
(50%)
Weighting
(%) ComponentYear
S6
S5
Product
Data
Collection
Project
Proposal
50%
25%
25%
8
PPrrooppoosseedd AAsssseessssmmeenntt FFrraammeewwoorrkk
1
1
No. of
Marks to be
submitted
for Task
(80%)
1
No. of
Marks to be
submitted
for Process
(20%)
Task Weighting
(%) ComponentYear
S6
S5
Product
Project
Proposal
55%
25%
9
Streamlining ProposalStreamlining Proposal
1 (55%)
1 (25%)
No. of Marks to be
submitted for Task (80%)
1
No. of Marks to be
submitted for
Process (20%)
ComponentYear
S6
S5
Product
Project
Proposal
Work of data collection reflected in the Product
and to be assessed together
Two times of marking and mark
submission for Task
Smaller number of Process activities
designed and assessed
10
FFeeaattuurreess ooff tthhee PPrrooppoossaall
The issue of workload related to assessment
is addressed to a certain extent
The principle and original design are
maintained
Three stages of learning and teaching
process remain unchanged
The weightings are commensurate with the
amount of work involved in different parts
Enhance the reliability of the assessment
11
TTiimmee FFrraammee
May - Aug 2011: Formulating streamlining proposals by CDI and
HKEAA
Sep – Oct 2011:
Presenting the proposals to Principals’ Liaison Meeting, SBA Advisory Group, CDC-HKEAA
Committees for discussion
14 Oct 2011:
Briefing sessions for school leaders
12
TTiimmee FFrraammee
Oct – Nov 2011: Sharing the proposals with teachers at SBA subject conferences
Nov - Dec 2011:
Consulting schools about the proposals
Jan - Feb 2012:
Endorsement sought from the Public Examinations
Board
Feb 2012: Informing schools of the finalised arrangements
13
14
~ Thank You ~