proposal for slow urban living apartments
TRANSCRIPT
Slow Urban Living Apartments: Transformation of Five Story Walk-up Apartments in Seoulby
Yihyun Lim
B.A. University of California, Berkeley (2005) 1 ASSACHUSETTS IS EOF TECHNOLOGY
Submitted to the Department of Architecture MAR 2 6 2013in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of
Master of Architecture LIBRARIESat tne
Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyFebruary 2014
© 2014 Cy.'-ewet. All rights reserved,The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis
document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created.
Signature of Author:.................................................................Department of Architecture
January 30, 2014
Certified by................. ..........Andrew M Scott
Associate ProfessorThesis Supervisor
Accepted by................... ..... ....................................................Takehiko Nagakura
Chair of the Department Committee on Graduate Students
SLow Living Apartment City:Transforming the Five Story Walk-Up Apartment Complex in SeoulbyYihyun Lim
B.A. University of California, Berkeley (2005)
Submitted to the Department of Architecturein Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree ofMaster of Architectureat theMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyFebruary 2014© 2014 Yihyun Lim. All rights reserved.The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies ofthis thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created.
Signature of Author:Department of ArchitectureJanuary 15, 2014
Certified by....................................................................................Andrew M ScottAssociate ProfessorThesis Supervisor
Accepted by............Takehiko NagakuraChair of the Department Committee on Graduate Students
Thesis Readers
Adele Naude SantosProfessor of Architecture and Urban Planning
Mark JarzombekProfessor of the History and Theory of Architecture
Gediminas UrbonasProfessor of the Art, Culture, and Technology
2
SLow Living Apartment City:Transforming the Five Story Walk-Up Apartment Complex in SeoulbyYihyun Lim
Submitted to the Department of Architecture on January 15, 2014in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree ofMaster of Architecture
ABSTRACT
Experiential living is the new trend for future living. Whether it is through living in micro spacces, flexible units,mixed-use developments, practicing urban farming, or sharing lifestyles, these different trends of living inter-sects at the overlapping theme of experiential living. At the same time, Seoul is facing a final vave of 'retire-ment age' of the first generation of post-war urban housing apartments. Instead of the typical scrap-and-buildurban renewal method (the culprit of the formation of 'apartment city', with over 60% of housing stock asapartments), is there an alternate method of urban redevelopment?This thesis investigates idea of small-scale urban renewal by integrating the idea of 'experiential stow living'in the existing low-rise, enclosed apartment community. Can this idea of transforming the ground level expe-rience with slow food (productive landscapes) and slow craft (mixed-use living and shared spaces) become thealternative model for urban renewal that can be practiced throughout the city of apartments?
Thesis Supervisor: Andrew M. ScottTitle: Associate Professor
3
In Seoul, a city of apartments, a special news onapartment transformation spread...
5
A
6
Slow Urban Living- Apar etments in Seoul
Transformatiorioi Five Story Wap
SPECIAL REPORT ON LIVING TRENDS& proposal for 'new' model housing of slow living
retrofit of 1970's five-story walk-up apartments
7
The first section of the special editionof Apartment Daily follows the different
living trends.
8
............................ ..
Living Trends
01 _Experiential Living : Intersecting Trends Points to Experiential
Living as the Future 18
02_Case Study: Slow Living Movement 20
9
-. I&*4)-t"WO' A- 0'At~rn~~~t 4' 0u#e "0eM
es ~ ~ % -.Ise Logn - l
7.-
* as~
~I
Litt~4~
N A
The next section further examinessocial and demographic trends,from urban farming to craft based
small entrepreneurships.
10
...... ..... -
Social Trends
01_The Rise of "Homo Faber": Man as Maker 22
02_Slow Food: Produce What You Eat - how much farm land 23
is needed to sustain yearly consumption?
03_From Etsy to Budy, an online marketplace for handmade goods 25
04_Makers movement - micro entrepreneurs 27
05_Shared Toolshop, Workshop Space for Small Business Owners 29
A new Model for Live-Work
11
R 0 -*----w--.e-.1gq
I
12
- - - t 1d
w
Demographic and Housing Trends
01_Featured Report - Demographic/Housing Trends 30
02_From Tower Living to Ground Living 32
13
1 ~~~1
- f-i ~: ~:* [
14
Proposal: Slow Living Apartment CommunityTransformation of Existing Five-Story Apartments
01_Apartment Danji's (complexes), Pockets of Enclaves 37
02_From Scrap and Build to Reconfiguring the Ground 39
03_Neighborhood Transformation 40
04 Apartments Re-envisioned: Back to the Basics: SLOW LIVING 49
05_Ground Level Transformations - Opening up the Private Compound 50
06_Slow Living Apartments - Plans and Sections 64
07_Slow Living Components - Productive Gardens 85
08_Slow Living Components - Live-work/Shared Workshops 91
09_Slow Living Components - New Units/Retrofit-Infill 97
Ground Level Townhouses
Rooftop Level Bridge Houses
10_Afterword_ Micro-Urban Renewal as the Preferred Method 113
11_References 115
15
SAV
4
* 4
4 *4
pf
16
i i
OF
mk %
17
Featured Report - Living Trends
Featured ReportExperiential Slow Living as Future Living Trend
Trends
Cities and living environments have beenevolving and adapting to changes in differ-ent trends. Whether it is through organicreconfiguration (due to market forces), ortop-down changes through public policy,housing in cities are constantly reorganiz-ing. What are the key trends that are hap-pening currently that will shape the futureform and function of urban living environ-ments? From micro-units to shared living,this article looks at four trends in housingthat will inevitably overlap to reveal thefuture living trend; the experiential living.
Trend 1Micro Living:Living simple, living small
Micro-living is both a product of densifi-cation of cities and also socio-economicchanges. Changing demographics suchas aging population, increased life expec-tancy, elongated single life, and increasednumber of single households demands fora change in housing form. The desire forliving close to the cultural amenities a cityprovides increased the demand for housingin cities. With the advent of technology inflexible interior housing configuration, peo-ple are able to live in small compact spaces.
Trend 2Mixed-Use Living:From Townhouses to Live-Work UnitsMixed Use CommunityDays of strict zoning are gone. Separat-ing the land use to living, working, shop-ping, and producing are stories of the past.Back in 1961, in the book "The Death andLife of Great American Cities", Jane Ja-cobs celebrated cities formed from ev-eryday uses and enriched by diversity.She criticized the segregation of uses ofthe city from zoning and advocated theblurred boundaries of urban programs.Mixed-use is key; light manufacturing canoccur in homes, entertainment can oc-cur in workplaces, work can be done athomes, and food can be produced in cities.
Trend 3 Trend 4Self-Sufficient Living: Shared LivingCultivating Community from Produc- From carshare to toolshare - sharingtive Landscapes hobby spaces
Growing food is not just for farmers. Smallurban plots can be used to produce veg-etables and fruits year around and bringus a step closer to becoming self-suf-ficient. From rooftop gardens to pocketparks, productive Landscapes within thecity become another infrastructure forthe city that connects pockets of residen-tial enclaves to another, Food becomes asocial medium where growing own foodfulfills a desire for the haptic and tangi-ble, creating a city infrastructure that en-gages people and cultivates community.
Our world is becoming more and moreshareable. Sharing is a growing practiceand a concept that is restructuring ourworld. There are car sharing, yard shar-ing, tool sharing, co working, and co hous-ing, just to name a few. Sharing is thenew social contract where new lifestyleis emerging from changes in the conceptof ownership and increased efficiency.
These four trends have the commonground of expanding the experience ofdaily life.
Experiential living, where tangibleexperience is key, is the future livingtrend.
19
Featured Report - Living Trends
Trends: Slow City Movement
relaxed or lei-surely pace; unhurried
What is Slow Movement? "Slow" en-compasses several layers of meaningthat go beyond "sustainable". Slow isthe opposite of "fast" - fast food, fastmoney, fast living -- and the negativeconsequences "fast" had for the envi-ronment, society, and health of people."Slow" embodies cooperation, sustain-ability, resilience, and sufficiency.
The CittasLow Movement, was initiatedin 1999 by the mayors of four Italiantowns to advocate the "La dolce vita"(sweet life). Based on the Slow Foodand the Slow movement, the Slow CityMovement seeks the real developmentof communities by cultivating and con-
miages from cittastow.kr
tinuing the local culture of the commu-nity. The movement seeks to protectthe natural ecology of communities,traditional culture, local products andhandicrafts, and increase communityengagement.
As in the Slow Food movement, theSlow City movement also aims to linkproducers and consumers to fair trade.The movement has spread across 16countries with 116 Slow City networks.
slow (adj.)Movement or actions at a
20
Featured Report - Living Trends
Experiencing the slow city is becomingpopular in Korea, appreciating its cut-tural and educational values. There arecurrently nine 'slow' cities throughoutKorea, ranging from salt farms to zip-buL (straw) handcraft village.
.t
images from cittaslow.kr
21
fJr.
%oAV V411"
Featured Report - SociatTrends
Featured ReportThe Rise of"Homo -Faber": Man as Maker
Trends
In an era of the digital, haptic and the tan-gible is coming back to the main scene.We're seeing the increasing interestin growing own food and creating owngoods. Sociologist Richard Sennett in his2008 book, "The Craftsman", makes acase for homo faber (or "man as maker").According to Sennett, it is only throughmaking things that we gain true under-standing, and is one path to a fulfillinglife.
In a culture with overload of branding andcheap mass-produced goods (from fastfood to fast fashion), a post-industrial.nostalgia for the pre-industrial handmadeproducts is on the rise. Handmade prod-ucts are romanticized, and uniquenessand quality are winning over quantity.
Easy access to online markets to sell andbuy these handmade goods is also addingto the popularity of handmade goods. An
online marketplace connects the farmer tothe customer directly, or a stay-at-homemother can open an e-commerce site eas-ily to market her handmade goods.
The following section will cover two com-ponents of "Homo-Faber";
1. Slow Food movement - makingown food
2. Makers movement - individualentrepreneurs and handmadegoods
22
Man as Maker1. SLow Food Movement: making your own food
ROOFTOPS
year-around veggiesgrains and legumesgreenhouses
URBAN FARM
grains and legumesseedlings, seed savinggreenhouses and nurseries
Urban farming is a common prac-tice these days. Private backyardsare converted to vegetable gar-dens, empty lots are appropriatedas community gardens, and vacantrooftops are turning into rooftopvegetable gardens. Various tech-nologies, from aquaponic to aero-ponic farming, allows urban dwell-ers to become creative in growing
their own food in multiple ways.The illustrations on the right showsdifferent scales of urban farmingoptions, which can be utilized atindividual home level, communitylevel, or a city-wide level (ediblestreetscapes).
COMMUNITY GARDEN
veggies, orchardsflowers, herbsapiariesseedlings, seed saving
STREETS
berries and fruitsnuts
23
44
Featured Report - Social Trends
1acrepq (4,047 sqm)
How much urban farm land isneeded to feed enough fruits andvegetables for 1 year?
According to a study, one acre of farm landcan produce enough fruits and vegetablesto feed 144 people annually. This convertsto 28 square meters of farming space forone person.
4
24
1 I
Featured Report -Social Trends
From Etsy to Budy: Growing Business ofHandicrafts Online Social Open Markets
Trends
Etsy, an ecommerce site for hand-made and vintage goods, boasts itspeople-powered economy with per-son-to-person commerce. The plug-and-play platform allowed anyonewith simple Internet skills to start anonline business. Since it launched in2005, the Brooklyn-based companynow has over 25 million membersworldwide (over 200 countries), andemploys more than 400 people in theUS and abroad.
Sociologist Richard Sennett, agreescrafters are "not just bored peo-ple with time on their hands. A lotof people are finding their day jobspretty empty, whereas learning a
craft provides a real satisfaction. It'sa skill - things like carpentry andweaving are mentally and physicallystimulating, and people get inherentpleasure out of that kind of work," hesays (Barford, Vanessa. "Etsy, Folksyand the Mania for Making Crafts." BBCNews. BBC, 1] Aug. 2012. Web. 30 Jan.2014)
Followed by the success of Etsy andFolksy (UK version), Korea now alsohas its own version, called Budy. Thefounders of Budy are hoping to bringthe handcraft market to the main-stream economy, and also encour-age entrepreneurship among womenand old retirees.
-
44>
25
Featured Report -Social Trends
Women in the Workplace:percentage of women participating in economic activity, 2012 surveyhttp //!xwwndex.go kr/egarms/sttsisp'potal/stts/PO STTSjIdxMain.jspidx cd=1572&bbs=INDX 001&clas div=A
past 10 years, the employement rate of women has been statted at 50%
51%
50%
49%2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
26
.... .......
Featured Report - Social Trends
Man as Maker2. Slow Crafi Movement : Micro Business Entrepreneurs
As seen in the previous example ofonline e-commerce for micro en-trepreneurs, easy accessibility ofthe online platform to reach out tomillions of other users is becominga large incentive for handicrafts.The rise of the handicrafts also re-flects the desire to express individ-uality and personality in a cultureof cheap mass-produced goods.The individuality of the small onlineshops brings the consumer withthe maker directly, bringing theexcitement of meeting the makerof the product one will purchase.
In Korea, the employmentrate of women has beenstalled at 50%.
The combination of handicraftsand online marketplace is one wayto bring in the women labor intothe active economy. In Korea, theemployment rate of women hasbeen stalled at 50%. According toa 2012 survey of women partici-pating in economy activity, amongOECD countries, Korea ranked onthe bottom end of the chart with55.2%, behind the OECD average.
27
-- ---- -± ----
WOOh-WORKING
General wood-working includestraditional wood-working craftskills. These skills are used incarpentry, whittling, furnituremaking and in some cases,architectural construction.
There a number of machines fromhand tools to digital mills thatcan be included in wood-workingfacilities:
* Air Compressors* Bandsaws* Power-Carving* Circular Saws* Drills* Grinders, Buffers* Joinery* Jointerst* Lathes* Miter Saws* Mortisers* Planers* Routers- Sanders* Shapers* Table Saws* Chop Saws
METAL-WORKING SCANNING
General metal-working includes Just as there is the proper printer
a number of standard machines for each job so is the case with
and processes for working with scanners. There are general
metal. The term covers a wide purpose models but size. form,range of work from large ships color and fidelity all matter. 3Dand bridges to precise engine scanners capture information
parts and delicate jewellery. In from a 30 object and translatemany cases machines for working it to a digital model for use andwith wood and metal are similar manipulation in a variety ofin function however, the machines software programs. They include
themselves often have special 3D scanners, laser digitizers and
requirements to move between CT scanners. Again the machines
materials. For example bandsaws included are only a sample-are used for both metal andwood however, metal band sawsrequire water hoses, cold air andseparate ventilation and plumbing MILUNGlines, as well as special blades.
" Metal Drills" Cold Saws" Metal Lathes" Edge Finderst Metal Grinders" Draw bars" Tapping ad Rolling Tools" Vises
Milling is a subtractive processwhich removes material tocreate a desired form. In mosttraditional settings mills arepart of daily wood-working ormetalworking shops. However,advances with computer-controlled, CNC milling almostmandates that this type of tool becalled out as separate from theirtraditional carpentry-focusedrnainternart%
AD WT1VE MANUFACTURING
3D printers range not only inprinted material (from metal toplastic, even food!) but in theprocesses they use to print. A 3Dprinter typically involves sometype of material being laid downin an additive process to slowlybuild a 3D form. Different designdisciplines use various printersbased upon that design's needs.Printer processes can rangefrom Stereolithography to FormDeposition Modeling and themachines included in this sectionare only a sample.
SOFTWARE
All of the machines reviewedhave proprietary software thataccompanies them. In additionmost machines require priorknowledge of various 20 and 3Dcomputer aided design programs.A sampling of both types ofsoftware are reviewed in thissection.
Existing~ labl[abs., kiita! Makers iloscana
28
wt ' U.0ft: M& 0400
4k 4-t
Featured Report - Living Trends
Shared Toolshop, Workshop Space forSmall Business Owners: A new ModelforLive- Work
The idea of tool libraries has beenaround since the 1970s, offeringcommunities to share resourcesthat would otherwise spend themajority of the time sitting in draw-ers. However, due to modernizationof cities, and individualization ofhousing types, communal spaceshave been slowly disappeared. Inthe current days of sharing society,the concept of sharing has returned.The term 'tool' has a wide range ofmeanings, from kitchen tools (think
large cooking blender), garden-ing tools, fabrication tools for de-sign and crafts, and also the spaceitself (kitchen and workspace).Housing complexes, or local com-munities in cities are bringing backthe shared spaces as a desiredamenity for residents. Easy accessto rapid prototyping tools (as illus-trated on the opposite page) andworkspaces can foster creativityand micro-entrepreneurship withinthe everyday life of urban residents.
N
11F29
This graph overlays multiple data on demograph-ics, housing stock, housing structure type, and alsothe redevelopment timeline. When looking at all ofthese data concurrently, we will be able tofind re-lationships between different trends, and also pre-dict the future direction of housing developments.
----------------------
30
Featured Report -Demographic/Housing Trends
Featured ReportDemographic/Housing Trends
Demographics Housing Stock Flexible Adaptation
Aging baby boomers, decreas-ing birthrates, aging society
The demographic trends of past fiftyyears show a slowing down of popula-tion growth rate. By 2040, Korea willface negative growth in population.It is also an aging society, with a babyboomer generation entering the 65+ agegroup. Over 30% of the population willbe people of 65 years of age and over.
What type of alternative lifestyle canhousing provide?
2008 marked 100% of housingprovision rate - The need fbrmassive construction is no longervalidApartment as housing type was firstintroduced in 1960s, and since them itbecame the majority of housing stock.In the late 1980s, government-ledmass construction of apartment hous-ing changed the urban form of the city.During this time over 50% of housingstock became apartments. In 2008,housing construction surpassed the100% housing provision rate. Althoughthere still is a mismatch of supply anddemand, the overall housing stockhas reached 100%. The need for mas-sive construction is no longer valid.
Reuse Retrofit Re-EnvisionBack to 'rigid-frame apartments': more opportunities for retrofit
The first generation of apartmentswere built in rigid-frame structure.However, during the mass construc-tion boom, reinforced concrete wall/column structure was preferred dueto lower cost, and faster constructiontime. However, at this time when popu-lation is decreasing and housing stock isabundant, retrofit has become the newmethod of redevelopment. Adaptationand flexibility are the new keywords inhousing development, and rigid framestructures are now back in demand.In what ways can we retrofit the exist-ing rigid-frame structure apartments?
31
Featured Report -Demographic/Housing Trends
From Tower Living to Ground Living
Housing design reflects the val-ue of the society : views, height,and back to access to nature
Housing developments reflect thevalue of the society it was built in.From low-rise communities of the1960s, the housing developments fol-towed the value of "modern living", ]tower living, and panoramic viewsof the city. As cities become dens-er with influx of population, the onlyway to accomodate the entire popula-tion was by building taller and taller.If housing is a reflection of the cur-rent values of the society, how willthe changing concept of urban liv-ing affect the housing form? Howwill the concept of slow-living influ-ence the redevelopment of housing?
32
i998
1
EONS
IE
;E
EVEL
OPEO
APA
RTM
ENIS
RE'
N5I
RfJ
(T(.N
MOV
EMEN
TS
WA
TN
, F
OR
l R
EC
EFN
TTR
C
T!0
N........
MI
Tt-U
Nir
MIE
REAM
LY
H
Uf ..
....
....
....
....
....
....
---
4E
E
FA
MIIV
tE
CU
SE
S
....
...
R
DV
EL
PE
PAR
I
M
N IS
..
....
....
....
....
....
....
. 'j-
ERE
IEET
TLM
ENTS
,
......
REN
TR[
IDA
AR
TME
NT
MOVEMNRE
R E
RE
OE
NR
CN
I1O
........................................
M E
Li
TIT
AM
.11
YU
INIT
S
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
. !!
0 P
AR
ME
NTS
G(OV
T D
RIVE
N)
N VA~~
Nsh
AIR
IVA
RE
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
."....
F A
A
+
U
-Ff
P
IA
E
C.)
CO
1991
1
34
Proposal for Slow Urban Living Apartments - a retrofit
Prototypical Model Housing from 1970s Turns IntoModel. Retrofit SLOW Community
35
SEOUL
OVER 60% HOUSING STOCK ARE APARTMENT COMPLEXES
36
Apartment Danji' (complexes), Pockets of Enclaves
Planned by the government and built by profit-driven develop-ers, the high-rise apartment housing type is the most perva-sive housing type found in Seoul. Compressed modernizationinduced rapid gentrification and urban renewal in SeouL. Usersand developers demand that buildings generate profit. The in-centive of providing additional floor area ratio to existing Low-rise residents, drived developers to instigate large-scale dem-olitions, followed by new construction, This scrap and buildprocess produced enclaves of high-rise gated communities.
The continuity of time and space in the urban landscape is inter-rupted by this cycle of scrap and build. Apartment as a housingtype has exponentially increased from 13.5% in 1985 to 53% in2005 (Kangnam district75.8%, national47.3%). In 2011, newcon-struction forapartment housingwas400,000 units, whereas con-struction of single-family housing was not even at 30,000 units.The homogenous, apartment developments create pock-ets of enclaves within the urban city. By limiting access to
non-residents, the block developments form an invisiblegated community and segregating the urban populationsocioeconomically. Rem Koolhaas writes about this pro-cess of urban redevelopment in his book as such, "Throughparallel actions of reconstruction and deconstruction, acity becomes an archipelago of architectural islands float-ing in a post-architectural landscape of 'erasure' wherewhat was once a city is now a highly charged nothing ness."
Housing creates social and physical armatures for streets,parks, neighborhoods, and communities. It shapes and orga-nizes the city and the quality of life of urban dwellers. If thisprocess continues, the city will become an archipelago of pri-vate developments, left with streets and commercial areas.
37
'~w
rnuei
.1a~
&
From Scrap and Build to Reconfiguring the Ground
Is scrap and build the only method of urban renewal? In theessay "Exodus", Rem Koolhaas describes urban renewalas war against the existing cities. Implants of large com-pounds of apartment buildings destroys the urban context.Existing lifestyles are eradicated and the sense of place isdiscontinued. Memories and local life is contained in oldcommunities (even though they are bleak 60s modernistapartments), it is necessary to preserve parts of the pastwhile implanting new things.
The following design proposal calls for a reconfiguration ofexisting low-rise apartment complex. It is certainly underthe pressure of redevelopment (the classic cycle of scrap-
and-build), however, is it possible to reconfigure the exist-ing state with additional elements of 'experiential slow liv-ing' to increase the property value?These reconfigurations can occur at contained scales, suchas the ground condition of apartment communities. By re-configuring the scenes and ways of our daily life, this pro-posal aims to create an alternative method of urban renew-aL.
How would you like to move around your community? Howdo you cultivate community? Through reconfiguration of oldbuildings, we have the opportunity to bring new visions.
39
Neighborhood in Transformation
Is this a community of the past? Should thislow-rise apartment community go throughthe same process of urban regeneration?
I I
Instead qf demolishing and building high-riseapartment buildings. can we design infills, re-configured ground conditions, and addition-al amenities to create a valued conununity?
diverse spacesdifferentiation
interaction
II
/i /
/~ ~/'/
/
HJI!
;,/ /'~
/ "/
/1
U77j,
/7/1 4/
Neighborhood in TransformationUrban Renewat
<77
Stories of the Past: StandardizedApartments as the Main HousingModel
Book Review: Apartment Surgery, by Y. Lim
Efficiency, profitability, and high housingdemands created the box-like apartmenthousing type. Average lifespan of apartmentcomplexes are 30 years - instead of scrapand build redevelopment, what are otherways of retrofitting the complex to meet thecurrent needs?
%~
%% *>~
apartment surgery- (ayered apartment urbanism
Z;
j.ai~
43
%kOL
1991L 1997
u-rn-SINGLF FAitYl' E - -- -
SWUAt ER SETTLEMENTS - -.-.-.-.
LOW R E MULTI FAMILYUNITS
MULIIIUNIT MUL TI-FAMILY HOUSING
REOFVELOPED APARTMENTS
RECONSOTUED OAPA ENTS
"vi "w
RECONS
RFCONS1
OPED APARTMENTS
NIS
WAITING FOR RFCONSTRUCTION
NEW S DRE)-..... - ......................... . .. ................................ REMODELING/RECONSTRUCTIONMOVEMENTS
N EW APARTMEN PRNVATEl I ........... -- ................ -....... ........ -.......--- REM,0 C§ TIONMOVE
2-7 FAR laveragel
1980 1998
1.5 F AR (average) 3,04 E AR
Neighborhood in TransformationUrban Renewal
ELEMENT 01: DENSITYHIGH' DENSITY MODERN LIVING - 1970s - 2013
1946-19981313 UNITS
-,,777 - ICIVIL SERVANTS)(HLLULVI -OP'W
MIDDL
EL- Li MENTARY
1970 -003S( UNITS r
I (FOREIGNERSI[REDEVE LOPED)
"a0UNITS 4.
SCH OOL 1974 - 20115 I/ 1300 UNITS)
IREDEVELOPMENT UNDERCONSTRUCT'ONJ
From 1966-1973, a total of 3220 apartment units were -
constructed along the waterfront.Apartment complexes were arranged along a main com-merciat spine-road, following perry's neighborhood unitconcept.
he *hangang mansion' complex is the only remainingfrom the 1970s house provision plan. All other complex-es are redeveloped into 20-30 story high apartments.
HOUSING DENSITYUNIT TYPES AND SIZES
4~ 1'
I 1' // lj I I [ /
K I~i 1'
/ ~iP~%% ~/
K (20) 188 sqm
(40) 168 sqm
(198) 122 sqm
% (258) 105 sqm
% (134) 89 sqm
650 units total
HOUSING DENSITY78.6 units/hectare
II ft/
K K
:fl
Proposal: Slow Living Apartment CommunityNeighborhood in TransformationUrban Renewal
LAST REMAINING LOW-DENSITY COMPLEX
~~C-K
__~~r AlKji1 -A CT" -Z - Tv
/
HANGANG MANSIONHOUSING DENSITY78.6 UNITS/HECTARE
AVERAGE HOUSING DENSITYOF REDEVELOPED APART-MENT COMPLEXES IN THENEIGHBORHOOD (IF BUILT INLOW RISES)300 UNITS/HECTARE
RECOMMENDED HOUSINGDENSITY (FOR 3-5 STORIESBUILDINGS)150 UNITS/HECTARE
HOUSING DENSITY
Proposal: Stow Living Apartment CommunityAlternative method for Urban Renewal
Apartments Re-envisioned: Back to the Basics: SLOWLIVINGTrends
In the previous section, we have identifiedexperiential slow living as the future trend inhousing. In a citywhere over half of the urbanform is dedicated to block apartments, willthese changes in trends affect the housing?
How will demographic trends such as theaging population affect demands for housingdesign and the formation of neighborhoods?What about new live-work arrangements?What are the alternatives to class-strat-ified, uniformly designed residential de-velopments? What kind of ground levelexperiences can cultivate communities?
The Slow Living Apartments aims to ad-dress some of these issues by layeringideas of slow-food and slow-craft/live-owork entrepreneurship spaces. Sus-tainability must be accessible and ap-plicable to the practice of everyday life.
49
Ground Level Transformations - Opening up the Private Compound
41 4"
ft
/
/ I;.'7
BREAK LARGE COMPOUND DEVELOPMENTINTO SMALLER BLOCKS
LINEAR BUILDINGS WITHDEFINED FRONT AND BACK,
UNUSED EXTERIOR SPACE
URBAN BLOCK TYPE WITHMULTIPLE FRONTAGE TO
PUBLIC STREET.POSSIBILITIES FOR PUBLIC
AND RESIDENT PROGRAMS.
Seoul is a composition of urban archipelago of recon-struction and deconstruction of apartment buildings. Thehomogenous form of rectangular apartment complexesdominate the current cityscape of Seoul. The by-product ofthis inscription on urban fabric is the equally homogenouspublic scape. Even though the apartment complexes areplanned and built with a kit of place-making tools (such as
playgrounds, community centers), the semi-public spacesof in-between spaces of apartment complex are becomingmore and more exclusive. If this current state of redevel-opment process continues, what we will be left with areislands of housing developments and left-over streets withcommercial spaces as public zones.
50
I-M40 as
4JA'V*q41j
4j*
Proposal: Slow Living Apartment CommunityGround Level Transformations - Opening up the Private Compound
OPENING UP PRIVATIZED SPACE: REINTEGRATE INTO URBAN FABRIC
site area:82,593 sqm
building footprint (sum}17,995 sqm
privatiZed area
lincLudes roads, parking)
The site is currently an enclosed community, withfences around all three edges. The above diagramshows the privatized area of the community. It iscurrently used as parking spaces.
51
OPENING UP PRIVATIZED SPACE: REINTEGRATE INTO URBAN FABRIC
Goal: To open up the privatized area, and break up the large complexto reintegrate the site into existing urban fabric.
Issue: Apartment owners have in fact 'purchased' the use of privatizedarea. This area should be 'returned' to the individual unit owners inorder to reclaim the public realm.
privatized area64,58 sqm
(includes roads, parking)
sum of all units:3,652 sqm
0.87 sqm of privatized area= per sqm of residential unit
(20) 188 sqm
(40) 168 sqm
(198) 122 sqm
(258) 105 sq m
x 0.94 sqm of privatized areaper sqn of residential unitlincludes parking, roadsl
163 sqm
146 sqm
106 sqm
91 sqm
77 sqm
- 35 sqm tot par king? per unit
128 sqm
111 sqm
71 sqm
56sqm
42 sqmn
- 40% totr roads
76 sqm
66 sqm
42 sqm
33 sqm
Result: provide the specified areaas shown to each unit as its own'private (100%) space.
25 sqm
52
In order to deprivatize the private grounds, privatespaces should be distributed back to the residents.Whether it through the form of private gardens oraccess to resident-amenity spaces, introduction ofdefined spaces is key to opening up the grounds.
Participation and appropriation of public space is es-sential to increase the quality of public space. Appro-
priation creates a sense of ownership of the spaceand thus the sense of responsibility to maintain theshared space.
The diagram on the left side illustrates how much'private" space needs to be distributed back to theresidents for the common ground to be public andshareable.
53
LIVE-WORKCOMMUNITY WORKSHOP
COMMERCIAL
Pi N H N I L !\PE ING TiS iNEET
AFTER-SCHOOL EDUCATIONCULTURAL SPACE
M1 I1 FV- RAMES
ELEVATED RESIDENT STREETWITH SHARED GARDEN
WR APR)UND MFSh WALLSTH AMPS
PRODUCTIVE GARDENXTE7 N 1)ED c,' R C7TR i'R D
1+1 UNITS--- T -- -- -- - --- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- --I - - -- - - - - - - -
-----------
............. ---- --------
....... .. .
ii.
A
This study looks at creating programmaticcourtyards by clustering apartment blocks to-gether. However, it was limited to breaking thelargercompound into smallercourtyard blocks,and lacked cohesiveness of the community.
55
V
71
-~ I
(20) 188 sqm
(40) 168 sqm
T (198) 122 sqm
% (258) 105 sqm
% (134) 89 sqm HOUSING DENSITY78.6 units/hectare
650 units total
56
IOPLN UP VIEW QWRRIDOR
xAURL OPLN SPACLSMALLER SCALENARIETY OF BLOCKS
-220 UNITS
This study attempts to create the feel of asmall scale residential neighborhood byslicing through the existing buildings andopening up the ground leveL. However,the deletion of the units reduced the totalnumber of housing units by 220.
57
w ww~ -
4
MORE OPFN SPACESMALLER SCALE/VARIETY OF BLOCKS
ADDITIONAL FLOORS, PRIVATE TERRACME
+220 UNITS (650 TOTAL)
This study takes the previous version ofopening up the ground level, and addingnew units at the top level to regain the lostnumber of housing units. The rooftop unitsgets access to outdoor rooftop spaces.
58
AW AWN& lw
W
om"11111111W oft
NNW
4%W
Alternate way of adding new units,bridging between two buildings withnew vertical access.
59
.........
POPULATION 2i
28,617
~0 ~~
I
What is needed in this neighborhood?
This area is a residential community with a maincommercial strip piercing through the center ofthe neighborhood. Each of the residential apart-ment compounds are encolosed communities,creating pockets of enclaves. A closer look atthe types of establishment shows lack of cul-tural and green space in the neighborhood. Thepopulation composition shows a large num-ber of families and older citizens, a need forfamily oriented, community space is detected.
60
Proposal: Slow Living Apartment CommunityGround Level Transformations
or N
~_ 2TOTAL ESTABLISHMENTS
SMALL SHOPS/MARKETS (22%) CLINICS/HOSPITAL [9%j18In I IN In I I In In IN IN I n I In IN In IN Is IN I n n in W iffi o- -. I is Ila In nn JIN 11iN IN Is iN iN Is il INi IN iN i IN IN is Il IN IllE IN IN IEIEn IEI IN IN Ito I i In Is In In in IN N In i n is
REAL ESTATE AGENCIES (15% A ED 1A)N i8%) BANKS 14%) OTHER 13%) SERVICES (10%)
61
.. ............
Adjacent housing communities of thisapartment complex has undergone mas-sive redevelopment. What is the future ofthis last remaining low-rise community?
62
The future of this community may becomean experimental ground for urban farming(slow-food), and small craft industry. Thecompound will be opened up to the public.
63
SITE PLAN
64
SITE PLANThe site plan shows the twomain green axis that charac-terizes this community. Newbridging units at rooftop andground level also be seen.
65
01-
C)I
8
('
9
31
CD('J Cr
tg
f7
3 !1
3 3
1(17
1,,
M r- to S 0ID
U)
I;R
0~
0- 0 3 G) CE
C
a
C) o 3 0 =r CD
:31) -
SITE STRATEGIES
/' ~j~KyJ/ ~ /I I/ I
*1 / '/
~Kj/
N nh~(
#~~J //~
F Li
Q4e%. ae,~ j
#ei g&4>
a~4~ 4.. .t>4j2 i/4j
e~4
Double Story Townhouse Units
At''.-I
Semi Public / Connecting Patios
Elevated Shared Patios
~#I
Ground Level Shared Patios
New Units
Underground Parking
New Unit Vertical Acciess
67
ROOFTOPS
year-around veggiesgrains and legumesgreenhouses
URBAN FARM
grains and legumesseedlings, seed savinggreenhouses and nurseries
COMMUNITY GARDEN
veggies, orchardsflowers, herbsapiariesseedlings, seed saving
STREETS
berries and fruitsnuts
The ground level is where major reconfigu-ration is occuring. The compound is openedup to the public street, allowing visitors tostroll down the two main green axis of thecommunity. Coutryards and smaller farmplots are designated as privately ownedplots, where residents can grow food.New townhouse infill units are also presentat this level, along the green axis.
68
w~
At
to Ai
600
7-
Ar
'44
neighborhood pLanground LeveL
69
70
..................................... ............................. .I ..., .
11
171
I Ai
~ / /
The rooftop level is where new bridge units areintroduced. The two story addition houses fourunits, where each unit has access to either aprivate rooftop garden or shared patio. Thereare total of 52 new units.
72
/
*
/
/ L*~,
A/
P1zz
*rr/
neighborhood planrooftop-bridge Living level
A,
~/, ,/*~
/
~/
I 1/
*1
/t~ ~ '2 ~~
*
I
73
i-y
/
7ZL
7
0 A
"I
/ /
J/ I
/ <
IIII7/
z
z
77
CLUISTER PLANS
75
Existing ConditionGround UsageParking Underground Parking
K
In the existing site, the entire site was occupiedby parking spots. Parking surround each building,which left no open space for resident use. In thisproposal, concentrated parking is located on theunderground level (half-level), below the sharedcourtyard deck.From 1066 parking spots, the proposed plan pro-vides approximated 350 parking spots. These spotsare intended for shared cars for residents.
76
cluster plan - underground levelparking
77
?C
slow craft walk
workshops
communitygallery
slow craft walkworkshops and shared spaces
two axisslow food walk + slow craft walk
slow food walk
slow craft walkmixed use retail + live work units
productive landscapesprivate plots and community gardens
78
I7 K;;7
//
cluster plan - ground levelproductive gardens and
townhouses
/
/
/ I'
/7I
/F j
I 7/1/////7 / 7II!
/,/; /4/7//1
i~i /<+/
Iii
4 [ 1~
47/ 17
p
/
-I
/1,
6 /
I
4:
k~p
/7 17
~
/7
/ '1
1/
1/ / /
~' If / /11/ /// /1
1/ / /7' / 1
/i/i" /f 1~/' / f~
/ ~
!~0
z~ I'
/ ~// / / ~//1~~'
/ /~ /C / / /
/ / //7
79
19,
Flexible Living RetrofitNew Unit Vertical Access
Flexible Living RetrofitNew Units
80
The rooftop level is where newbridge units are introduced.The two story addition housesfour units, where each unithas access to either a privaterooftop garden or shared patio.There are total of 52 new units.
cluster pLan - bridge Level6th floor elevated living
with rooftop gardens
LAII
0/
4/
/
/ /Ii~
81/
82
"%!il~iT EBP
Til
83
[U 9
I-I
K-
I[I1
I
SLOW LIVING COMPONENTSPRODUCTIVE GARDENS
The next four set of diagrarns illustrate therelationship between area of urban farmplots and the productivity from these farms.What happens if all 1000/c of the rooftopand ground becomes vegetable gardens?How much area needs to be converted tofarm plots if all 100% of residents needs tobe fed? What about the proposed design?
85
IF 100% OF ROOFTOPS AND GROUND AREA 191,67 SOMIS USED AS FARM PLOTS
4 28 sqm y 1person
What happens if 100% ofground level and rooftoparea becomes farm plots?
In this case study, roads,parking, and all availableground plane is converted tofarm plots (which is unlike-ly). At 28 m per person (afull year of vegetables andfruits), this coverage canfeed 3,273 people, over 184%of the resident population.
TOTAL E A EA
U5AEr.RoUN EFA- 2 m iud &
bJl b~
86
THESE PLOTS CAN FEED 3,273PEOPLE WITH ENOUGH FRUITSAND VEGETABLES FOR 1 YEAR
To calculate the number ofresidents in this complex,The average number ofpeople per household (2.73persons) has been multipliedby the number of units (650units). We can estimate thatthere are about 1,776 peopleliving in this community.
TO FEED THE ENTIRE RESIDENT POPULATION(1,775 PERSONS) WITH ENOUGH FRUITS ANDVEGETABLES FOR 1 YEAR
itititttift
1775 personseiasan X 28sqmfpersn
650 UNITS2.73 PERSON PERHOUSEHOLD
q i
54.% 49,700 SGM) COVERAGE OFGROUND+ ROOFTOP AREA ASURBAN FARM CAN FEED ENTIRERESIDENT POPULATION OF THISCOMMUNITY
V
How much area needs to beconverted into farm plots,in order to feed 100% of theresidents (1,776 people)?
We'll need to convert 54% ofthe total area of rooftop andground level area,This doesn't leave much areaof the ground level for otherusage, such as streets, park-ing, and open space.
1 TOTAL__SE AREA
\ V
p /AKLE GROUN MA
I ud5lesroad% pa jogtxd buildinle'tprmt)
87
APPRXIMATELY1775 RESIDENTS
%
IF ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING(18,714 SOM) IS USED AS FARM PLOTS
4 28sqmTHESE PLOTS CAN FEED 669PEOPLE WITH ENOUGH FRUITSAND VEGETABLES FOR 1 YEAR
How about if all existingLandscaping of the currentsite plan is converted intofarm plots?
Currently only 19% of theavailable surface is used aslandscaping. This results inproductivity of being able toproduce enough vegetablesfor 669 people annually (38%of total residents).
NG LAND CP~/
11,9,714-
v
88
Spersmin n
THESE PLOTS CAN FEED 851PEOPLE WITH ENOUGH FRUITSAND VEGETABLES FOR I YEAR
The proposed design utilizes26% of all available ground/rooftop surface as productivegardens, which producesenough vegetables and fruitsto feed 45% of the residentpopulation.
Differently size plots areprovided as private vege-table or shared communitygardens. Although a 7%increase in green surface(from existing condition)doesn't seem significant, theproposal creates differentnodes of farming areas forcollective experience.
26% 45%if. N8 1Tersons)
' p T P LEVELuCTIVE PLIOTS ii -
-97
ND EL
89
PROPOSAL
4 28 sqm4A
1 person
90
SLOW LIVING COMPONENTSLIVE-WORK/ SHARED WORKSHOPS
91
~L /i/~ ~'
7
/4
S6'
Alp,
92
/ /~7/
7< /
1/i
TOWNHOUSE UNITS + INDIVIDUALWORKSPACES
The townhouse units along the commercialstreet is provided with add-on workspacefor those wishing to run their home-officeor shops.
93
7,'
/>
1
/ /
~
/ a
/ h
/1
pr
/ /
/ /
/ /
//
I ~
~7/
/2/
~~
f*'
>11 1''
/44I,'
/ /
I /
/ /I
~~
/
.',
,, 4,
/
~,//
/ /
/1 /
~ 2
/!
/ /
~,',
/
SHARED WORKSHOPS_GARDENING TOOLS/COMMUNITY KITCHEN_TOOLSHOPS
Shared workshop, fabrication, and educational spaceoccurs along the main vehicular street, inviting thevisitors to join the different programs that might happenthroughout the day.
95
--o01-
NEW UNITSGROUND LEVEL TOWNHOUSES
ROOFTOP LEVEL BRIDGE HOUSES
97
~w~w w
STANDARDIZED UNIT CONFIGURATION (EXISTING)
9 (134) 89scIm
(258) 105 sqm
(198)122 sqm
(40) 168 sqm
(20) 188 sqm
-l Th-TlL La L
-.
STANDARD CONFIGURATION =3 BEDROOM + KITCHEN/DINING + LIVING
98
HOUSING DENSITY78.6 units/hectare
(20) 188 sqm
(40) 168 sqm
(198) 122 sqm
(258) 105 sqm
(134) 89sqm
650 units total
Existing ConditionUnit Types
EXISTING CONDITIONIn the existing site, there are five differentsizes of units (all within the same building), andare distributed throughout the site in clusters.However the unit configuration is the same in
all sizes of the units, it is only different in scaleand sizes. If only the rigid frame structure isleft and the interior is demolished, what typesof other living arrangements can be inserted todiversity the living condition?
99
J
464
4,12'#
~K~h>C
Flexible LANin' g RetrofitDouble Story Townhouse Units
GROUND LEVEL TOWNHOUSE UNITSNew townhouse infill units utilizes the rigidframe structure of the first and the second lev-el of the apartment buildings, and infilled alongthe grid module of the existing structure,Townhouses are located along the two greenaxis, allowing residents to have direct access to
Ground level townhlocations are shadeblue
the productive landscapes outside. Multiledirect entries of townhouse units increasesthe porosity at the ground Level, creatingcommunity along the streets.
101
1<
~2
'4
I
Oused in
lt:?
.4i
FLEXIBILITY: BOX FRAME WITH NEW UNIT INFILL
102
..... .. .. .. .. ..
DIVERSITY: ACCOMODATING VARIOUS HOUSEHOLD SIZES
,7LEXIST NG 105 SQOl UNITS1 100
EXIST ING STRUC1URE WITH HEW UJITS1 1oo
;Lin 1 4
---- ----i ----mL---
lv"L
90 SQM
EXISTING STRUCTURE WITH NEW UNITS1:50
H-I
H 1 rr'
_ HK]60 SCM 40 SM
103
Ii-- KIt I
104
- t
105
--
--
--
--~ -
~ -----
j77 <I 77/
4>4
A77
1~>
<7/7J
/77
1',<47-
47-IL:
2/ /~77777
77/71 ~
72 )>0117 ~77
~/777 1/7~1> ~ /7
.14
/74~/,
. 74 1 /
Flexible Livinn RetrofitNew Unit Vertical Access
ROOFTOP LEVEL BRIDGE UNITSThe rooftop level is where new bridge units areintroduced, The two story addition houses fourunits, where each unit has access to either aprivate rooftop garden or shared patio. Thereare total of 52 new units.
107
Flexible Living RetiofitNew Units
(D
/Xh
CD
/I///J
I/ /
//I
-//1
///
/I/
/1
I/ ,
7//
I f'l
1
rooftop bridge unit - level 7
109
110
Micro-Urban Renewal as the Preferred Method
The Slow Living Apartment example above uses various 'new living' components toinject the "experiential slow living" experience to the existing community. The resultof this transformation is increase in property value that can hopefully outweigh theincentives of the bonus FAR (floor area ratio) of large redevelopments.
These methods provide the possibility of Live-in renovation, where residents can con-tinue to live in their familiar neighborhoods,
Imagine this micro-renewal method is practiced in all remaining apartment com-plexes throughout the city. If all ground level are reconfigured with the idea of urbanfarms and small industry workshops, it can create a continuous productive urbanlandscape that connects the different enclaves of the city. It will form a new urbaninfrastructure.
What do you think?
113
Thank you everyone for your help and guidance,Finally. Let's move on.
114
REFERENCES
BOOKS AND ARTICLES
Chi, Jr-Gang. Heterogeneous Taipei Post-6o Mid-low Rise Housing Renovation Makes the City. Taipei: Garden City, 2013. Print.
Gelezeau, Valerie. Seoul Ville Geante, Cities Radieuses. CNRS Paris, 2003. Print.
Gorenflo, Neat, and Jeremy Adam Smith. "Ten Ways Our World Is Becoming More Shareable." Privatize! Volume 30. Amsterdam: StichtingArchis, 2011. 21-25. Print
Jacobs, Jane. The Death and Life of GreatAmerican Cities. New York: Random House, 1961. Print.
Lim, C. J., and Ed Liu. SmartcitiesEco-warriors. Abingdon: Routtedge, 2010. Print.
Mobile Experience Lab, MIT, Digital Makers Toscana: Understanding the Regional Economic Potential of Digital Fabrication and ArtisanalCraft, MIT,2013.
Koh Kitayama, Yoshiharu Tsukamoto, Ryue Nishizawa. Tokyo Metabolism.
Koothaas, Rem. Small, Medium, Large, Extra-large: Officefor Metropolitan Architecture, Rem Koolhaas, and Bruce Mau. New York, NY: Monacetti,1998. Print.
OPEN: Social Engineering, Nai Publishers 2008/No. 15
WEBSIT ES
www.cittastow.org - Cittastow International
Barford, Vanessa. "Etsy, Folksy and the Mania for Making Crafts." BBC News. BBC, 11 Aug. 2012. Web. 30 Jan. 2014.
Davis, Kathleen. "The 'Etsy Economy' and Changing the Way We Shop." Entrepreneur. N.p., Mar. 2013. Web. 10 Dec. 2013.
McGuirk, Justin. "The Art of Craft: The Rise of the Designer-maker." Theguardian.com. Guardian News and Media, 01 Aug. 2011, Web.30 Jan. 2014.
115