prophet in hindu scriptures

8/8/2019 Prophet in Hindu Scriptures

1/38

Prophet in Hindu ScripturesAn analysis (Part 1, 2 & 3)

Agniveer


2/38


3/38

Mission Agniveer - Vision Vedas. 1

A relatively new

propaganda seems

to be on rage these

days that Prophet

Muhammad (pbuh) hasbeen prophesised in Hindu

Scriptures. This seems to

be a great hit in major

Islamic websites over last

ew years. It is also very

useul in increasing the

eectiveness o conversion

programs driven by vision

o making India a Muslim

among country within next

5 years (as resolved by

Maulana Abdullah Tariq

recently on Peace TV).

And why shouldnt it

be eective. First, it is

proved that the Kalki

Avatar mentioned in

Bhavishya Puran is

none other than ProphetMuhammad. Second, it is

also demonstrated that

Vedas, the nal authority

in Hinduism, themselves

sang praise o Prophet

Muhammad.

Now the entry barriers

or a Hindu in embracing

Islam are suddenly

evaporated!

All that a devout Hindu

is doing now is accepting

the directions o his own

religion with urther

sincerity.

Thus, when a close

riend o mine, who is an

expert in Islam, visited

a prominent temple in

the heart o Lucknow,

he was greeted by the

head priest. He could see

marks on orehead o the

priest. When discussionscontinued on matter

Prophet in Hindu Scriptures

An analysis (Part 1)


4/38

2 agniveer.com

o religion, the priest

explained to him how

Prophet is the nal goal

or every Hindu and how

Islam alone can save

humanity.

Now my riend realized

that the mark on the head

was out o 5 times o daily

prayer in submission to

the legend who has been

prophesised in Hindu

Scriptures! And this is the

new direction o Islamic

conversion techniques that

he has been witnessing.

In this series, we shall

critically analyze the

claims o this propaganda

and bring truth to the ore.

The ounder o this

hypothesis is none other

than the stage-perormer

Dr Zakir Naik who can

recite page number,

chapter number and verse

number or any book

on earth. His style is so

hypnotic and entertainingthat the audience no more

has the space to check

relevance o his reerences.

The same style is evident

in his writing as well,

which orm the basis o his

memorized speeches.

And now, the conused

Muslim youth has ound a

new passion that conrms

their seat in Paradise.

They would simply copy-

paste rom his articles

and spread the good

word around on internet

orums, blogs and social

networking sites. The

print outs are circulatedin colleges and schools.

This is oten very eective

against certain less-well-

versed Hindus who all

under the ploy.

I hope this article willat least serve as a ready

reerence or answering

this propaganda through

a similar copy-paste i

nothing more. However i

this induces an attitude

o questioning among the

readers to seek the truth,


5/38


and at least reject the

obvious alsehoods that

come in this journey, I

would consider my eorts

to be ruitul.

This series is based on the

original article written

by Dr Zakir Naik and

published on Islamic

Research Foundation

website. You can review

the same here: http://

www.ir.net/index.

php?option=com_content

&view=article&id=201&It

emid=131

Beore we get into a more

detailed analysis, let us

argue a ew more points:

1. Muslims have been

in India or around

1000 years now. And or

majority o the time, they

were ruling this country.

Why is it that Muslims

could not discover this

obvious act in so many

years? In act, study

o Vedas and Puranswere more popular in

those times than it is

today! Why is it that no

commentary on Vedas

written by anyone since

Vedas were rst authored

(they are considered

the oldest books) could

ever discover such an

important act which is

to decide the ate o the

world?Ater all, as per DrNaik and Quran, the only

way to book a ticket to

Paradise is by believing

in Prophet Muhammad

to be the last Prophet

and his message being

the only authoritative

message o God! Thus no

message o Vedas can be

more important than this

message, i it is indeed a

true ction!

2. I indeed Vedas could

prophesise coming o

Prophet Muhammad, why

not consider Vedas to be

work o another Prophet?

Is it not a miracle that

the oldest book on earthcould predict arrival o the


6/38

4 agniveer.com

last Prophet! So, why not

accept Vedas as book o

God?The usual answer to

this perplexing question is

that Vedas may have been

the rst book, but Quran is

last and hence only Quran

has to be ollowed. Now

my counter-question is

that is God perect or not?

I yes, which is what Quranwants us to believe, then

why could not God give his

rst book as nal edition?

I God knows everything,

what made him change his

own theories? This means

that God is imperect.

Here, when trapped, the

proponents weakly argue

that Gods knowledge is

same but the application

changes rom time to time.

I that be so, should nota new Quran come now

when the world order has

completely changed rom

barbaric middle ages when

Quran had to accept evils

like slavery, polygamy and

gender discrimination?

Further, Vedas talk o

rebirth. They talk o

monogamy. They talk

o Law o Karma and

reuse belie in Heaven

or Hell. They believe that

nature, God and soul

are beginning-less and

endless. Creation and

Destruction happen in

continuous cycles. Theseare completely opposite to

Quranic view o polygamy,

one birth, permanent

Heaven or Hell and this

being the rst and last

creation o God that

happened in ew days a

ew thousand years ago. I

can agree to some extent

to uture plans being

modied by God as part o

some grand strategy, but

how can even God changethe history o universe

that had already happened

even beore Vedas came in

Quran, his revised edition

o message? Is God so

orgetul o what he has

already done? I that beso, what is the guarantee


7/38


that he will not realize

some more mistakes and

send another edition o his

message?

Secondly, i indeed

Vedas could predict about

Prophet Muhammad, and

Dr Zakir Naik sincerely

believes so, should he

not consider Vedas also

as a book by Prophets?

I not last, at least the

rst one? This is where

Dr Naiks corrupt tricks

get exposed. He ears

that any admission o any

other books apart romthose ollowed by believers

(Jews, Christians and

Muslims) being given by

God may put him in Hell

orever, as per instructions

in Quran. So in another

article o his, he fatly

reuses to admit that

Vedas are indeed books o

revelation. He conveniently

orgets that he himsel has

proved that Vedas gave

the biggest prophecy oall times the advent o

Prophet Muhammad and

claims that

There is no text

in the Quran or SahihHadith mentioning the

name o the revelation

that was sent to India.

Since the names o the

Vedas or other Hindu

scriptures are no where

to be ound in Quran and

Sahih Hadith, one cannot

say or sure that they were

the revelations o God.

They may be the revelation

o God or may not be the

revelation o God.

You can check it out

on his FAQ on Hinduism in

his IRF site (www.ir.net)

3. We should also

scrutinize what

qualications Dr Zakir

Naik possesses to interpret

Vedas? Is he a Sanskrit

scholar or a Vedic Pandit?

Or has he reerred to

works o any scholar? No!

He simply lists names osome commentrators on


8/38

6 agniveer.com

Vedas in his articles whom

he has reerred to. Most

o these are either western

indologists who are

considered authentic in

rst place, or some others

whom only Dr Naik knows.

Further he does not

provide exact translation

by any o the scholars

and only writes out thecommentary that suits his

predrawn conclusion. Even

the western indologists did

not hint on even remotest

reerence to Muhammad!

Thus all Dr Naik has done

is ollowing the old art

o marketing, That a lie

shouted thousand times

becomes a truth!

In next parts o the

series, we will analyze the

prophecy o Muhammad

in Bhavishya Puran and

Vedas respectively.


9/38


Dr Naik provides a very

detailed analysis o verses

o Bhavishya Puran

along with reerences.

The only mistake he made

was that he presenteda completely opposite

picture o Prophet

Muhammad compared

to what Bhavishya Puran

actually writes. (Reer

http://www.ir.net/index.

php?option=com_content&view=article&id=201&It

emid=131)

http://bhavishyapuran.

blogspot.com/ provides

an excellent analysis o

the relevant portions oBhavishya Puran with

scans o original texts and

dictionary meanings o the

key words.

In summary, the actual

meaning o the verses is asollows:

Shri Suta Goswami

said that a demon called

Tripurasur who was earlier

burnt to ashes by Shiva

has taken birth again

in orm o Mahamada(Muhammad) and his

deeds are like that o an

evil ghost. The ghost was

rebuked by Kalidas as O

rascal, you have created

an illusion to bewilder the

king, I will kill you, youare the lowest

Further, the ghost called

Mahamada comes in

dream o King Bhoja and

says,

O king, your religion is o

course known as the best

religion among all. Still

I am going to establish

a terrible and demoniac

religion by the order o

the Lord . The symptomso my ollowers will be

Prophet in Hindu ScripturesBhavishya Puran (Part 2)


10/38

8 agniveer.com

that they rst o all will

cut their genitals, have no

shikha, but having beard,

be wicked, make noise

loudly and eat everything.

They should eat animals

without perorming

any rituals. This is my

opinion. They will perorm

puricatory act with the

musala or a pestle as youpuriy your things with

kusha. Thereore, they will

be known as musalman,

the corrupters o religion.

Thus the demoniac religion

will be ounded by me.

It is amply clear that

contrary to Dr Naiks

claims, Mahamada

(Muhammad) is being

condemned here as a

demon and not as a

spiritual person. Far

rom being a Kalki

Avatar, Muhammad is

being oretold as a devil

harbinger o nuisance!

Having analyzed the

verses, let us analyze a

ew more points regarding

Bhavishya Puran:

1. Bhavishya Puran

is not considered an

authoritative religiousscripture. It is amply clear

that the book continued

to be written till late

19th century. Because

it also contains stories

o Jesus Christ, Akbar,

Sawai Jai Singh, Alha

Udal, Tulsidas, Surdas,

Guru Nanak, Shahjahan,

Aurangzeb, Shivaji and

even Queen Victoria and

her Parliament. Bulk o

the material seems to bewritten during oreign rule.

Thus, Bhavishya Puran

does not even come in

category o evidence, when

it comes to Hindu religion.

2. Still i Dr ZakirNaik has inallible aith

in Bhavishya Puran, he

should also admit that

Muhammad was a devil

and reincarnation o

Tripurasur.

3. Also, i Dr Naik


11/38


has so much trust on

Bhavishya Puran and

considers the book so

prophetic, why does he

not admit other advices

o the book the astings

on specic days and

their benets, worship o

dierent idols, avoidance

o meat, celibacy, shraadh,

prohibition o marriageamong close relatives,

agnihotra, holy places,

cow protection etc. And

accordingly, he should

reuse to believe in those

verses o Quran which are

against the precepts o

Bhavishya Puran.

In the next part o the

series, we shall critically

examine the claim o

Prophet Muhammad in

Vedas.

More on Bhavishya Puran:

Extracted rom http://

bhavishyapuran.blogspot.

com/

Bhavishya Purana : ThePrediction o Islam And

Muhammad

According to Bhavishya

purana

Mahamada (Incarnation

o Tripurasura the

demon) = Dharmadushika

(Polluter o righteousness)

Religion ounded

by Mahamada =

Paisachyadharama

(demoniac religion)

Original Sanskrit Version:

Bhavishya Puran: Prati

Sarg: Part III:3,3 5-27

Translation source:

(http://www.indiadivine.

org/articles/188/1/

Bhavishya-Purana-The-

Prediction-o-Islam/

Page1.html)

[From the third part o

the Pratisarga Parva.]

Shri Suta Gosvami said:

In the dynasty o king

Shalivahana, there were

ten kings who went to

the heavenly planets

ater ruling or over 500


12/38

10 agniveer.com

years. Then gradually

the morality declined

on the earth. At that

time Bhojaraja was the

tenth o the kings on

the earth. When he saw

that the moral law o

conduct was declining he

went to conquer all the

directions o his country

with ten-thousand soldierscommanded by Kalidasa.

He crossed the river

Sindhu and conquered over

the gandharas, mlecchas,

shakas, kasmiris, naravas

and sathas. He punished

them and collected a large

ammount o wealth. Then

the king went along with

Mahamada (Muhammad),

the preceptor o mleccha-

dharma, and his ollowers

to the great god, LordShiva, situated in the

desert. He bathed Lord

Shiva with Ganges water

and worshipped him in

his mind with pancagavya

(milk, ghee, yoghurt, cow

dung, and cow urine) andsandalwood paste, etc.

Ater he oered some

prayers and pleased him.

Suta Goswami said: Ater

hearing the kings prayers,Lord Shiva said: O king

Bhojaraja, you should

go to the place called

Mahakakshvara, that land

is called Vahika and now is

being contaminated by the

mlecchas. In that terrible

country there no longer

exists dharma. There was

a mystic demon named

Tripura(Tripurasura),

whom I have already

burnt to ashes, he hascome again by the order o

Bali. He has no origin but

he achieved a benediction

rom me. His name is

Mahamada(Muhammad)

and his deeds are like

that o a ghost. Thereore,

O king, you should not

go to this land o the

evil ghost. By my mercy

your intelligence will

be puried. Hearing

this the king cameback to his country and


13/38


Mahamada(Muhammad)

came with them to

the bank o the river

Sindhu. He was expert

in expanding illusion, so

he said to the king very

pleasingly: O great king,

your god has become my

servant. Just see, as he

eats my remnants, so I will

show you. The king becamesurprised when he saw this

just beore them. Then in

anger Kalidasa rebuked

Mahamada(Muhammad)

O rascal, you have

created an illusion to

bewilder the king, I will

kill you, you are the

lowest

That city is known as their

site o pilgrimage, a place

which was Madina or ree

rom intoxication. Having

a orm o a ghost (Bhuta),

the expert illusionist

Mahamada(Muhammad)

appeared at night in ront

o king Bhojaraja and

said: O king, your religionis o course known as

the best religion among

all. Still I am going to

establish a terrible and

demoniac religion by the

order o the Lord . The

symptoms o my ollowers

will be that they rst o

all will cut their genitals,

have no shikha, but having

beard, be wicked, make

noise loudly and eateverything. They should

eat animals without

perorming any rituals.

This is my opinion. They

will perorm puricatory

act with the musala or

a pestle as you puriy

your things with kusha.

Thereore, they will be

known as musalman, the

corrupters o religion.

Thus the demoniac religion

will be ounded by me.Ater having heard all

this the king came back

to his palace and that

ghost(Muhammad) went

back to his place.

The intelligent king,Bhojaraj established the


14/38

12 agniveer.com

language o Sanskrit

in three varnas the

brahmanas, kshatriyas

and vaisyas and or the

shudras he established

prakrita-bhasha, the

ordinary language spoken

by common men. Ater

ruling his kingdom or

50 years, he went to

the heavenly planet. Themoral laws established

by him were honored

even by the demigods.

The arya-varta, the pious

land is situated between

Vindhyacala and Himacala

or the mountains known

as Vindhya and Himalaya.

The Aryans reside there,

but varna-sankaras reside

on the lower part o

Vindhya. The musalman

people were kept on theother side o the river

Sindhu.

On the island o Barbara,

Tusha and many others

also the ollowers o

Isamsiha were alsosituated as they were

managed by a king or

demigods.

Note This: Lord Shiva

said: O king Bhojaraja,you should go to the place

called Mahakakshvara,

that land is called

Vahika and now is being

contaminated by the

mlecchas. In that terrible

country there no longer

exists dharma. There was

a mystic demon named

Tripura(Tripurasur), whom

I have already burnt to

ashes, he has come again

by the order o Bali.He has no origin but he

achieved a benediction

rom me. His name is

Mahamada(Muhammad)

and his deeds are like that

o a ghost.

According to Bhavishya

Purana Muhammad was

the rebirth o Tripurasura

the Demon. Tripurasura

was killed by Shiva in

his(Tripurasuras) past

lie. Tripurasuras Past

lie (Mythology[not rom


15/38


bhavishya purana])

source(http://www.

ashtavinayaktemples.com/

temple.

Tripurasur was the son

o Sage Gritsamad. One

day the sage sneezed and

rom this was created a

young boy who the Sage

brought up as his ownson. The sage taught the

boy the Ganana Twam,

Ganesh Mantra. Equipped

with this mantra the

boy meditated intensely

on Lord Ganesh who

ultimately blessed him. He

was given three pura-s o

gold silver and iron. Since

he was the owner o these

three pura-s he was given

the name Tripur. Ganesh

also bestowed on Tripurto be the most powerul,

who none but Lord Shiva

himsel could destroy

and ater being destroyed

by Lord Shiva he would

attain mukti-salvation.

This boon made Tripur

proud and he brought

havoc in the entire world.

He conquered the Nether

world and then proceeded

to takeover Heaven. He

deeated Indra the king

o heaven. His aggression

made Lord Brahma hide

in a lotus and Lord Vishnu

in the Shirsagar. He

soon also took over LordShivas Kailash Parvat

and thus became the King

o all the three worlds. The

gods wondered on how

to vanquish Tripurasur.

Lord Narada told them

that, since he had been

granted a boon by Lord

Ganesh himsel it would be

very dicult to vanquish

him. He advised them to

meditate on Lord Ganesh.

Pleased Lord Ganeshdecided to help the Gods.

Disguised as brahmin he

visited Tripurasur and

told him that he was a

very enlightened Brahmin

and could make or himthree fying planes. Riding


16/38

14 agniveer.com

these he woud be able to

go anywhere he wished

within minutes. The planes

could only be destroyed

by Shiva.In return Lord

Ganesh asked him to

get him the statue o

Chintamani which was

at the Kailash Mountain.

Lord Shiva reused to give

the statue to Tripurasursmessenger. The angry

Tripurasur himsel went

to get the statue. A erce

battle started between

him and Lord Shiva. He

destroyed everything that

belonged to the Lord

Shiva who too retired to

the Girikandar.

Lord Shiva too realized

that he was unable

to destroy Tripurasur

because he had not paid

his respects to Lord

Ganesh. He recited the

Shadaakshar Mantra to

invoke Ganesh. On doing so

rom his mouth emerged

Gajanan to grant Shivaa boon. Shiva continued

his invocation o Ganesh

who ultimately directed

him on how Tripurasur

could be killed. Lord Shiva

was asked to recite the

Sahastranam and then

direct an arrow at the

three pura-s o Tripurasur.

Lord Shiva ollowed these

instructions and nally

vanquished Tripurasur.

The place where Lord

Shiva invoked Lord

Ganesh he also created a

temple or him. The town

surrounding this temple

was called Manipur. The

village Ranjangaon is

considered to be the place

where Lord Shiva himsel

sought the blessings o

Ganesh and ultimately

destroyed Tripurasur.

This prayer (chalisa)

praises the Lord Shiva

(Related to Tripurasura

killing)

Tripurasur sang yuddha

machayi,


17/38


sabahin kripa kari leen

bachayi.

By ghting and killing the

Demon Tripurasur,

You orgave everybody and

saved the Gods.

Mlechha (meaning)

(rom Sanskrit dictionary)

mleccha

1 A barbarian,a non

Aryan ( One not speaking

the Sanskrit Language or

not conorm in to Hindu

or Aryan institutions),a

oreigner in general

2 An Outcast, a very low

man, Bodhayana thus

denes the word:

gomAmsakhAdako yastu

viruddhaM bahubhAshhate| sarvAchAravihInashcha

mlechchha ityabhidhiiyate

He who eats cows meat,

and speaks a lot against

shastras and he, who is

also devoid o all orms ospiritual practice, is called

a mlechha.

3 A sinner, A wicked

person, A savage or

barbarian race etc

Paisachya (meaning)


Paisachya

Demonical, Inernal

Tripurasura

Asura (meaning)


Asura

1 An evil spirit,demon

2 A general name or the

enemies o Gods,

In the next part o the

series, we shall critically

examine the claim o

Prophet Muhammad in

Vedas.


18/38

16 agniveer.com

Let us now critically

examine the claim o

Muhammad in Vedas.

You can read the

original article at http://

www.ir.net/index.php?option=com_content

&view=article&id=201&It

emid=131

Let me declare at outset

that Vedas contain no

history or geographywhatsoever and contain

description o undamental

principles governing lie

and universe in a variety o

manner. There are indeed

names o several historicalpersons in Vedas. But

that does not mean that

Vedas prophesise those

people. It only means

that those words were

popular and people chose

to adopt these names. Iwe nd mention o word

Krishna in Mahabharat

or Vedas, it does not mean,

they prophesise about Lal

Krishna Advani! By that

logic, Bible prophesises

about all people born with

name George and Islamic

texts about people named

Muhammad, Ali etc!

I shall not dwell into the

concept o Vedas being

beyond prophecies, history

and geography in this

analysis. On contrary, we

shall prove that even i we

assume Vedas to contain

prophecies, that can no

way be associated withProphet Muhammad,

unless IRF believes that

Prophet Muhammad was

a mass murderer and

protector o cows, as we

shall see later. And i

indeed they believe so, letthem issue a world-wide

Prophet in Hindu ScripturesVedas (Part 3)


19/38


atwa to start donating

cows, stop eating bee and

admitting that Prophet

Muhammad killed the

entire population o

Mecca! Just as they would

be issuing a atwa that

Prophet Muhammad was

a ghost/demon incarnate

in name o Tripurasur (as

per Bhavishya Puran).Going urther, they should

also then accept the

theory o rebirth!

I shall quote the text

published at IRF website

as IRF: and the analysiso the same as Analysis:

The actual meanings o

the mantras will be quotes

as Actual:

1. Prophet Muhammad

(pbuh) Prophesised in

Atharvaveda

IRF:

In the 20th book o

Atharvaveda Hymn 127

Some Suktas (chapters)are known as Kuntap

Sukta. Kuntap means the

consumer o misery and

troubles. Thus meaning

the message o peace and

saety and i translated in

Arabic means Islam.

Analysis:

1. By this logic, all books

o spiritualism and sel-

help and their contentwould mean Islam!

Because Peace and

removal o misery are

the primary goals o any

spiritual text on sel-help

book.

2. Considering that

Vedas came way beore

Muhammad ounded

Islam, this only means

that whatever peaceul

or good was brought by

Muhammad in Islam

was actually already a

part o Vedic traditions.

And that the word Islam

was already existing

way beore Muhammad

adapted it to name hiscult.


20/38

18 agniveer.com

It is welcoming that

Muslims are now

acknowledging that they

owe their peaceulness

to Vedas. I hope they

would take this journey o

seeking truth even urther

and completely embrace

the Vedas to reach their

original roots.

IRF:

Kuntap also means hidden

glands in the abdomen.

These mantras are called

so probably because their

true meaning was hidden

and was to be revealed in

uture. Its hidden meaning

is also connected with the

navel or the middle point

o this earth. Makkah is

called the Ummul Qura

the mother o the townsor the naval o the earth.

In many revealed books

it was the rst house o

Divine worship where God

Almighty gave spiritual

nourishment to the world.

The Quran says in Surah

Ali-Imran chapter 3, verse

96:

The rst house (o

worship) appointed or

men was that at Bakkah(Makkah) ull o blessings

and o guidance and or

all kinds o beings. Thus

Kuntap stands or Makkah

or Bakkah.

Analysis:

1. Which dictionary states

that Kuntaap means

hidden glands in the

abdomen?

2. Further, even i it means

so, as researched by Dr

Naik, how does it link with

navel? In abdomen, all

other organs are hidden

inside liver, stomach,

intestine etc. It is only the

navel which is not hidden!

3. The third line o IRF

quote obviously reers to

Islamic belie o earth

being fat, and Muhammad

being born in centre o

the earth! But as perVedas and modern science,


21/38


earth is almost spherical

and hence all points on it

can be considered middle

point.

4. Had Mecca (Makkah)

been on Equator, perhaps

some credibility could

have been attached to IRF

claims. But as per modern

science, in a non-fat

world, Mecca lies at 21-29

N. It is not even on Tropic

o Cancer!

(The importance given

to Mecca in Islam is

because o historical

reasons dating prior to

advent o Islam. The

worship o Mecca was so

popular that Muhammad

could not have spread

Islam by opposing it. So

a religion that claims toworship only the shapeless,

omnipresent Allah would

still seek to ace Mecca

and visit it at least once to

get passport to Paradise.

As per some historical

researches, there was a

Hindu temple in Mecca.

The story o Mecca being

navel o earth seems

to indicate that there

was a grand statute o

reclining Vishnu there with

Brahma coming to rom

his navel, as indicated by

certain researches. This

is a popular Hindu image

and may have led to story

o Mecca being navel oearth, in dark ages.)

But no way, can Kuntaap

be implied to mean

Mecca!

5. The logic o IRF is

abulous:

Kuntaapa = abdominal

glands = navel = center

= center o the earth =

Mecca

hence, Kuntaapa = Mecca

Lets use IRF logic on

Islam itsel and see where

it leads us:

Poison = Death = Rest =

Peace = Islam

hence, Poison = Islam


22/38

20 agniveer.com

So rom IRF evidence

itsel, there is cold, hard

proo that Islam is

Poison!

IRF:

Several people have

translated these Kuntap

Suktas like M. Bloomeld,

Pro. Ralph Grith,

Pandit Rajaram, PanditKhem Karan, etc.

Analysis:

1. O the translators

mentioned by IRF, two are

western indologists who

had their own Christian

agenda. They can no way

be considered relevant or

understanding o Vedas.

2. But interestingly, even

they talk o nothing

even remotely related to

Muhammad or Mecca

in the alleged verses.

The only common point

perhaps is the word camel.

It seems that IRF team

rantically searched orvarious mantras reerring

to camel in Vedas, and

chose to interpret them,

as per their own agenda,

as would soon be evident.

Readers can review the

Grith translation o

these mantras at http://

www.sacred-texts.com/

hin/av/av20127.htm and

decide themselves. They

can review translationso other scholars

mentioned by IRF and

check truth themselves.

We shall provide excerpts

rom translation by

Pandit Khem Karan as

illustration. You can

check them at http://

www.aryasamajjamnagar.

org/atharvaveda_v2/

atharvaveda.htm

3. In their pursuit o

searching mantras with

reerence to camel, IRF

made another blunder. The

Kuntaap Sukta appear at

end o Atharvaveda and

are not considered to be

part o Veda Samhita,but merely an addendum


23/38


(Khil Bhaag or Appendix)

by many scholars. This is

the only portion in entire

Vedas that have such

a dierence in opinion

among scholars. Had IRF

chosen any other Sukta/

Hymn in more than 20000

mantras o Vedas, they

would have been much

saer. Thus Kuntaap whichIRF proved to mean

sae is not that sae

to deend their claim o

Muhammad in Vedas!

IRF:

The main points mentioned

in the Kuntap Suktas i.e.

in Atharvaveda book 20

Hymn 127 verses 1-13

are:

Mantra 1

He is Narashansah or the

praised one (Muhammad).

He is Kaurama: the prince

o peace or the emigrant,

who is sae, even amongst

a host o 60,090 enemies.

Mantra 2

He is a camel-riding Rishi,

whose chariot touches the

heaven.

Mantra 3

He is Mamah Rishi who is

given a hundred gold coins,

ten chaplets (necklaces),

three hundred good steeds

and ten thousand cows.

Mantra 4

Vachyesv rebh. Oh! ye

who glories.

Analysis:

Mantra 1

Actual Meaning

(Pandit Khem Karan):

Narashanshah or the

praised one shall be

praised. O Kauram one

who dwells happily on

earth, we shall receive

60090 kinds o gits rom

those brave ones who have

destroyed violent ones.

Mantra 2, 3

Actual Meaning (PanditKhem Karan): His chariot


24/38

22 agniveer.com

has twenty ast-moving

camels and she-camels.

He donated 100 gold

coins, 10 garlands, 300

horses and 10000 cows to

deserving people.

Mantra 4

Actual Meaning (Pandit

Khem Karan): Keep

preaching in the manner

a bird chirps on a tree

laden with ruits till death

comes.

So ar, nothing seems odd

about the meanings given

by IRF or other scholars.

The only dierences is

that certain terms have

subtly been introduced

to set the context or

proving Muhammad inthese mantras. In modern

parlance, this technique is

called covert persuasion.

Note that so ar nothing

hints at Muhammad

except that there is a

mention o camel!

Now let us enjoy the IRF

research magic!

IRF:

The Sanskrit word

Narashansah means the

praised one, which is the

literal translation o the

Arabic word Muhammad

(pbuh).

Analysis:

1. The Arabic term b-ismi-

llhi r-ramni r-ram

which is uttered beore

every verse o Quran

is literal translation o

Dayanand ki Jai. Does

it mean that Quran sings

glory o Dayanand? Now

Dayanand has been the

strongest critic o Quran

ever. So does it mean

that Quran admits thatDayanand is right?

2. Again this is nothing

but Poison = Death = Rest

= Peace = Islam, hence

Islam = Poison ( we shall

keep revisiting this logicwherever IRF uses the


25/38


same logic as well)

IRF:

The Sanskrit word

Kaurama means one who

spreads and promotes

peace. The holy Prophet

was the Prince o Peace

and he preached equality

o human kind and

universal brotherhood.Kaurama also means an

emigrant. The Prophet

migrated rom Makkah

to Madinah and was thus

also an Emigrant.

Analysis:

1. Kaurama means one

who dwells peaceully

on earth. Now history is

evident o how peaceul

has Prophets lie been,

how many peaceul battleshe waged, how peaceully

he conquered Mecca and

how peaceul is Islamic

concept o brotherhood

or non-believers in Quran/

Prophet.

2. The way Prophet

migrated rom Makkah

to Madinah, has been

replicated by millions

throughout the history.

One can hardly name a

historically amous person

who becomes amous

without moving around!

Krishna migrated rom

Vrindawan to Mathura

and then to Dwarka.Also Krishna has several

meanings which mean

promoter o peace and

praised one. So this verse

equally applies to him as

well!

3. Again the logic is same:

Poison = Death = Rest =

Peace = Islam

IRF:

He will be protected rom

60,090 enemies, which

was the population o

Makkah.

Analysis:

From which census

did IRF nd out thispopulation gure? Or is


26/38

24 agniveer.com

yet another revelation?

IRF:

The Prophet would ride

a camel. This clearly

indicates that it cannot be

an Indian Rishi, since it is

orbidden or a Brahman

to ride a camel according

to the Sacred Books o

the East, volume 25,Laws o Manu pg. 472.

According to Manu Smirti

chapter 11 verse 202, A

Brahman is prohibited

rom riding a camel or an

ass and to bathe naked. He

should puriy himsel by

suppressing his breath.

Analysis:

1. The mantra says

allegorically that the

chariot o the king willhave twenty male and

emale camels. Even i

we take it literally, did

Muhammad ever travel

on such a camel-chariot?

And is Prophet the only

camel-rider on earth ever

in history?

2. The mantra talks about

a king who is a Kshatriya

and not a Brahman. So

the relevant excerpt rom

Manu is not applicable in

rst place.

3. Vedas nowhere prohibit

camel-ride or anyone.

4. Manu Smriti has been

written much ater Vedas.So evidence o Manu

Smriti is not applicable

in rst place. Also the

particular shloka rom

Manu Smriti is considered

a later day interpolation

by many scholars. In act

hal o the Manu Smriti

is considered interpolated

because it is against

the Vedas, which Manu

himsel declares to be

most supreme.

5. But even i we agree

to this shloka o Manu

Smriti, it is not applicable

or relevant in context

o given mantras o

Atharvaveda. Furtherthe shloka simply states


27/38


that i a Brahman has

to ride on a camel, he

can puriy himsel by

doing Pranayam. It does

not say that Brahman

is banned rom riding

camel. And the mantra

or the entire Sukta has

no reerence to Brahman

whatsoever. It talks about

battle and war, which isprerogative o Kshatriya

and not Brahman, as per

traditional Manu system.

IRF:

This mantra gave the

Rishis name as Mamah.

No rishi in India or

another Prophet had this

name Mamah which is

derived rom Mah which

means to esteem highly,

or to revere, to exalt, etc.Some Sanskrit books

give the Prophets name

as Mohammad, but

this word according to

Sanskrit grammar can

also be used in the bad

sense. It is incorrect to

apply grammar to an

Arabic word. Actually

shas the same meaning

and somewhat similar

pronunciation as the word

Muhammad (pbuh).

Analysis:

1. The word Mamahe

is used in the 3rd

mantra o 127th sukta

o Atharvaveda and notMamah. There is a

world o dierence as we

will see in next point. The

derivation as given by IRF

is their own independent

research not corroborated

by any text on grammar.

2. The word Mamahe has

been used as a verb here,

meaning We give and

NOT a noun.

3. Further the word hasbeen used in plural and

not singular. So it can not

denote a singular person

by wildest stretch o

imagination.

4. I the word Mamahehas to mean a noun


28/38

26 agniveer.com

Muhammad in this

mantra, the mantra

becomes meaningless.

Because Mamahe is the

ONLY verb in the entire

mantra. And no sentence

can have any meaning

without presence o even a

single verb!

IRF:

He is given 100 gold

coins, which reers to the

believers and the earlier

companions o the Prophet

during his turbulent

Makkan lie. Later on

due to persecution they

migrated rom Makkah

to Abysinia. Later when

Prophet migrated to

Madinah all o them

joined him in Madinah.

Analysis:

1. Suddenly, gold coins

have turned into believers

with Prophet in his Mecca

times!

2. No text o Islam statesthat his ollowers were

100 in number initially.

Some biographers do hint

at 40 ollowers, but 100

seems to be another new

revelation. Reer http://

www.religionacts.com/

islam/history/prophet.htm

Thus this is the Prophetic

imagination taken too ar!

IRF:

The 10 chaplets or

necklaces were the 10 best

companions o the Holy

Prophet (pbuh) known as

Ashra-Mubbashshira (10

bestowed with good news).These were oretold in this

world o their salvation

in the hereater i.e. they

were given the good news

o entering paradise by

the Prophets own lips and

ater naming each one he

said in Paradise. They

were Abu Bakr, Umar,

Uthman, Ali, Talha, Zubair,

Abdur Rahman Ibn Au,

Saad bin Abi Waqqas,

Saad bin Zaid and AbuUbaidah (May Allah be


29/38


well-pleased with all o

them).

Analysis:

1. What made IRF

think that necklace

can mean companions?

Merely the act that 10

companions o Prophet

are very amous in Islamic

olklores? Almost allProphets o Islam roamed

in desert and hence were

camel riders.

2. So why cant this mean

Ten Commandments o

Moses, by same logic!

IRF:

The Sanskrit word Go is

derived rom Gaw which

means to go to war. A

cow is also called Go

and is a symbol o war

as well as peace. The

10,000 cows reer to

the 10,000 companions

who accompanied the

Prophet (pbuh) when he

entered Makkah duringFateh Makkah which

was a unique victory in

the history o mankind

in which there was no

blood shed. The 10,000

companions were pious

and compassionate like

cows and were at the same

time strong and erce and

are described in the Holy

Quran in Surah Fatah:

Muhammad is the

Messenger o Allah;

and those who are with

him are strong against

unbelievers, (but)

compassionate amongst

each other.

[Al-Quran 48:29]

Analysis:

1. This is yet another

research o Dr Naik that

Go means to go to war.Go indeed means a lot o

things in various mantras

depending on the context

Cow, Earth, Moving Body

etc. But in the current

context, where the subject

is o donation, the obvious

meaning is Cow.


30/38

28 agniveer.com

Donation o Cow has

been a longstanding Vedic

tradition still practiced

and respected. All Vedic

legends were preservers

and protectors o cow. All

noble Vedic kings were

known to donate cows.

Cow orms the backbone

o Vedic civilization and

Hinduism.

This is where IRF comes

in tight spot. Because

contrary to donating

cows, Muhammad and

his ollowers till today

are known to be thebiggest tribe o cow-

killers. They take pride in

killing cows in Id. Thus,

this reerence to donating

10000 cows is sucient

enough to prove the most

sceptic mind that these

mantras have anything

even remotely to do with

Prophet Muhammad or

any o his predecessors or

successors.

2. It is even more hilarious

to see the comparison o

10000 companions o

Muhammad with cow. I

they mean cow, then cow

cannot mean to go at war

in this mantra. Because

the same word cannot

mean two completely

dierent things in same

context.

3. I indeed Muslims

consider cows to be

compassionate and pious,

as described in IRF

article, what makes them

kill these cows in name

o Allah? What makes

Muhammad a cow-killer ithat be so?

4. In act in this mantra,

to make sense in lines

o IRF propaganda,

Go has to mean three

things to go at war (averb), symbol o peace

and symbol o war, all at

the same time! It has to

be a verb and a noun at

the same time! Because

Mamahe the only verb

in the mantra has been

deliberately interpreted


31/38


as a noun in this mantra

by IRF experts. Thus this

would have to be the only

sentence o its kind in

history o language where

a word is a verb and two

nouns at same time, and

another word which is

supposed to be a verb is

now a noun.

Sounds conusing, right?

But then conusion alone

can breed such blinded

theories!

IRF:

This mantra calls theProphet as Rebh which

means one who praises,

which when translated into

Arabic is Ahmed, which is

another name or the Holy

Prophet (pbuh).

Analysis:

Again the same logic o

1. Poison = Death = Rest

= Peace = Islam

=> Poison = Islam

2. b-ismi-llhi r-ramni

r-ram is another way o

saying Dayanand ki Jai!

Battle o the Allies

described in the Vedas.

IRF:

It is mentioned in

Atharvaveda Book XX

Hymn 21 verse 6, Lord

o the truthul! These

liberators drink these

eats o bravery and the

inspiring songs gladdened

thee in the eld o battle.

When thou renders

vanquished without

ght the ten thousandopponents o the praying

one, the adoring one.

This Prophecy o the

Veda describes the well-

known battle o Ahzab

or the battle o the Alliesduring the time o Prophet

Muhammed. The Prophet

was victorious without an

actual confict which is

mentioned in the Quran in

Surah Ahzab:

When the believers saw


32/38

30 agniveer.com

the conederate orces they

said, This is what Allah

and His Messenger had

promised us and Allah

and His Messenger told

us what was true. And

it only added to their

aith and their zeal in

obedience.

[Al-Quran 33:22]

The Sanskrit word karo

in the Mantra means the

praying one which when

translated into Arabic

means Ahmed, the

second name o Prophet

Muhammed (pbuh).

The 10,000 opponents

mentioned in the Mantra

were the enemies o the

Prophet and the Muslims

were only 3000 in number.

The last words o the

Mantra aprati ni bashayah

means the deeat was

given to the enemies

without an actual ght.

Analysis:

Actual Meaning (Pandit

Khem Karan): O

Protector o Truthul!

You have been pleased

by those brave ones who

produce bliss, by acts o

bravery and noble passion

in wars against the

enemies. Through smart

action oriented zeal, ten

thousand enemies have

been deeated withoutresistance.

1. I indeed it means

Battle o Ahzab, why is

the number o soldiers in

Prophets army not given?

2. The phrase Dash Sahsra

or its variants are used in

several places in Vedas to

signiy a large number or

limitlessness.

3. There is no word as

Karo in the mantra. The

closest sounding word in

the mantra is Karave

which DOES NOT mean

praying one. It means

or the action-oriented.

NO name o Muhammadmeans action-oriented.


33/38


So any connection

with Muhammad is

categorically ruled out.

4. The mantra reers tospiritual battle where the

mind destroys innumerable

varieties o negative

thoughts through practice

and meditation o positive

things in lie. And hence

the victory is bloodless.

The sukta can also be

interpreted to explain

strategies o war. But no

way does it, or any mantra

in Vedas reers to any kind

o history.

IRF team is advised to

consult the Vedic experts

to understand the hidden

treasures and deep

essence o Vedic mantras

and come back to theiroriginal roots, rejecting

the alsehood.

IRF:

The enemies deeat in the

conquest o Makkah is

mentioned in Atharvaveda

book 20 Hymn 21 verse

no 9:

You have O Indra,

overthrown 20 kings

and 60,099 men with anoutstripping Chariot wheel

who came to ght the

praised one or ar amed

(Muhammad) orphan.

The population o Makkah

at the time o Prophetsadvent was nearly 60,000.

There were several clans

in Makkah each having

its own chie. Totally there

were about 20 chies to

rule the population o

Makkah. An Abandhu

meaning a helpless man

who was ar-amed and

praised one. Muhammad

(pbuh) overcame his

enemies with the help o

God.

Analysis:

1. There is no census data

to validate that Mecca had

a population o 60,000 in

Muhammads era except

IRF research based on

their own revealed sources.


34/38

32 agniveer.com

2. Literal translation o

this mantra means that

60000 plus enemies

and their 20 kings were

crushed under the chariots.

By this logic, there should

be 60,000 soldiers in

the battleeld. I that be

so, it means that entire

population o Mecca

ought against Muhammadand were killed by him. I

that be so, i this mantra

be a true Prophecy,

Muhammad cannot be

a symbol o peace. On

contrary, it proves that

Muhammad carried out

a mass genocide o entire

Mecca population because

they reused to accept him

as their dictator! Then,

Islam remains a religion

o peace only in Arabicdictionary, and not in

reality!

3. In reality, this Balttle o

Mecca was as small tribal

battle where 900-1000

soldiers and 300 soldierso Islam have supposed

to have ought or a ew

hours, as per Islamic

experts. And not more

than 10 leaders are known

to have participated

rom Meccan side. Thus

neither the number 20,

nor 60000 in mantra has

any reerence to this tiny

battle.

4. This sukta actually

details spiritual battle

in the mind as is evident

rom other mantras in the

sukta. The same strategies

can be extended to

external war as well. But ithas no inkling o relation

with any tribal war.

And i still, it is assumed

to have so, it only means

Muhammad was a mass-

killer. IRF experts candecide what they want to

accept.

III. Muhammad (pbuh)

prophesised in the Rigveda

IRF:

A similar prophecy is also


35/38


ound in Rigveda Book I,

Hymn 53 verse 9:

The Sanskrit word used is

Sushrama, which meanspraiseworthy or well

praised which in Arabic

means Muhammad (pbuh).

Analysis:

1. Literally translated,

the meaning is similar to

previous verse, implying

Muhammad carried a

mass-genocide o 60000

plus people to rule Mecca

2. Sushravasa means a

good listener or a reliable

riend in this mantra,

nothing to do with

Muhammad.

3. Even i its means well

praised, it only means

that Muhammad was

well-praised by his men

or carrying carnage o

60000 people o Mecca!

It is in best interest o

IRF to not harp on such

attempts to discover

Muhammad in Vedas

which only denigrate

him. Their research o

Muhammad in Bhavishya

Puran has already proved

him a demon and a ghost

Tripurasur!

IV. Muhummad (pbuh)

is also prophesised in the

Samveda

IRF:

Prophet Muhammad

(pbuh) is also prophesised

in the Samveda Book II

Hymn 6 verse 8:

Ahmed acquired rom

his Lord the knowledge

o eternal law. I received

light rom him just as rom

the sun. The Prophecy

conrms:

The name o the Prophet

as Ahmed since Ahmed

is an Arabic name. Many

translators misunderstood

it to be Ahm at hi and

translated the mantra as

I alone have acquired

the real wisdom o myather.


36/38

34 agniveer.com

Prophet was given eternal

law, i.e. the Shariah.

The Rishi was enlightened

by the Shariah o ProphetMuhammad. The Quran

says in Surah Saba

chapter 34 verse 28

We have not sent

thee but as a universal

(Messenger) to men,giving them glad tidings

and warning them (against

sin), but most men

understand not.

Analysis:

This is laughing Jehad at

its best. The aim to kill

indels by making them

laugh like anything.

1. I tried my best to

locate this mantra in the

Samaveda but could not.

Maybe i they can provide

the exact mantra, that

would help.

2. Aham At Hi is

authentic Sanskrit way

o expression. And in

joining o words, t

becomes d. For example,

Sat + Aachaar =

SaDaachaar. Hi means

only.

3. I indeed Vedas

predicted word Ahmad

which is Arabic word, does

it mean Arabic is older

than Vedic Sanskrit?

4. I Vedas could predictupto Ahmad and

number o his armymen

and companion, what

prevented Vedas rom

predicting his actual name

Muhammad? Why did

Allah create so much

o conusion? Had he

simply put the biography

o Muhammad in a ew

mantras clearly spelling

his name, crores o people

would have been convincedo Prophets coming and

would have prevented

themselves rom going to

Hell! Allah must be crazy

as per IRF research, then!

General Analysis

1. I indeed Vedas have


37/38


prophecy on Muhammad,

why are they not in one

place. In an ocean o

20000 mantras, there

are only 7 mantras

about Prophet, the most

important topic o the

Vedas who would change

the entire structure o

Vedic concept topsy-

turvy! These too aredistributed randomly and

none clearly spelled the

name o Muhammad. They

only mean Muhammad

in same way as Islam

means Poison. Was it that

Allah was still conused

about the name o his last

Prophet?

2. I indeed Vedas predict

that Muhammad would

kill so many people and

make 10 his companion,

it means that Allah had

already decided that

these people would be

killed by Muhammad and

dispatched to Hell. He had

pre-decided the ate othese people millenniums

beore he gave them birth

on earth! Does it not

make Allah unjust and

biased?

3. I indeed Vedas could

predict Muhammad and

his lie, why is IRF and

Muslim world shy about

embracing Vedas as Books

o God? Why he has to

write in FAQ on Hinduism

that Vedas may or MAY

NOT be book o God?

4. And i Vedas can predict

Muhammad, and they talk

o concepts which clearly

contradict Quran, which

one should be believed?

Ater all Quran was

written 20 years ater

Muhammads death, there

was no oral tradition o

memorizing and protecting

Quran in Muhammads

times and his avorite

ollowers were ghting

o each others lives ater

Muhammad died! So how

can we trust Quran to beauthentic?


38/38

But Vedas have an oral

tradition since its inception

and inbuilt mechanism to

prevent any interpolation

o even a syllable. So

they are denitely the

most protected books o

the world. So should not

IRF, Dr Zakir Naik and

his ollowers return to

their roots which are soaccurate, unchanged and

so strong in predicting

uture?

Further, they predict

Muhammad as nothing

but mass-murderer, byIRFs own research in

Vedas! Their research in

Bhavishya Puran proved

him to be a ghost or

demon called Tripurasur

who is supposed to bring

lot o nuisance in the

world! (Kindly reer to

previous part o this

series)

They say that lie has no

eet! Hence it gets you

t a d!

I appeal to all my lost

riends IRF, Dr Zakir

Naik, his riends and his

ollowers - to explore

the real praiseworthy, the

real Narashansah in the

Vedas, the Ishwar and

reject alse prophecies

about alse prophets. Such

alsehood can only trap

you in your own mistakennotions in same way as

this alsehood has trapped

you logically without any

room or escape.

I appeal to them to stop

believing in and spreadingmyths and return back to

their original path the

path o Truth and Reason!

Only then can peace be on

him (pbuh)!

prophet in hindu scriptures

Documents