propagator corrections to linear · pdf filematrix equations [mark e. casida in recent...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Mark E. CasidaInstitut de Chimie Moléculaire de Grenoble (ICMG)Laboratoire d'Études Dynamiques et Structurales de la Sélectivité (LÉDSS)Équipe de Chimie Théorique (LÉDSSÉCT) Université Joseph Fourier (Grenoble I)F38041 GrenobleFranceemail: Mark.Casida@UJFGrenoble.FR
PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR RESPONSETIMEDEPENDENT
DENSITYFUNCTIONAL THEORY (TDDFT)
1
11th Nanoquanta Workshop Houffelize, Belgium 20 September 2006 30 min
![Page 2: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What chemists should not do ...
With permission from Sidney Harriswww.sciencecartoonsplus.com
2
![Page 3: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Difficultés de Communication (Language Problems)
Chemist = chemical physicistPhysicist = solid state physicist
DFT≠abinitio
For the purposes of this talk :
3
![Page 4: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
I. Ionization Spectra II. TDDFTIII. Green Functions from a Chemist's ViewpointIV. Polarization Propagator CorrectionsV. Conclusion
4
![Page 5: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Electron Momentum Spectroscopy (EMS)
e e
eEnergy of the ionized electron
ℏ=ℏ
2m k1
2ℏ
2m k2
2−ℏ
2m k0
2
k=k1k2−k0
Momentum of theionized electron
k1k2
k0
HCCH
5
![Page 6: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ℏ=ℏ
2m k1
2ℏ
2m k2
2−ℏ
2m k0
2
k=k1k2−k0
P. Duffy, S.A.C. Clark, C.E. Brion, et al. Chem. Phys. 165, 183 (1992)
Experimental Data
6
![Page 7: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Ionization spectra are traditionally modeled using Green functionmethods. We would like to be able to be able to obtain the samething from DFT.
Patrick Duffy, Delano Chong, Mark E. Casida, and Dennis R. Salahub, Phys. Rev. A 50, 4707 (1994). "Assessment of KohnSham DensityFunctional Orbitals as Approximate Dyson Orbitals for the Calculation of ElectronMomentumSpectroscopy Scattering Cross Sections''
S. Hamel, P. Duffy, M.E. Casida, and D.R. Salahub, J. Electr. Spectr. and Related Phenomena 123, 345 (2002). "KohnSham Orbitals and Orbital Energies: Fictitious Constructs but Good Approximations All the Same"
7
![Page 8: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Ionization Spectra as Excitation Spectra
HCCH
HCCH+
⋯2g22u
23g21u
4
1u−1
2u−1
3g−1
2g−1 ?
2g−1 ?
∆SCF works forprincipal ionizations
Shakeups mightbe best obtainedas excitations
8
![Page 9: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
What is a shakeup ionization?
1u
1g
3g
2u
2g
1u
1g
3g
2u
2g
Mixing of 1h and 2h1p states
3u 3u
9
![Page 10: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
I. Ionization Spectra as Excitation SpectraII. TDDFTIII. Green Functions from a Chemist's ViewpointIV. Polarization Propagator CorrectionsV. Conclusion
10
![Page 11: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Pour
For a system, intially in its ground state, exposed to timedependentperturbation :
1st Theorem: vext
(rt) is determined by ρ(rt) up to an additive function oftime
Corollary: rt N , vext r t C t H t C t t e−i∫t0
tC t ' dt '
2nd Theorem: The timedependent density is a stationary point of theaction
A[]=∫t 0
tt ' ∣i ∂
∂ t '− H t ' ∣t ' dt '
[Actually, the timedependent density should rather be generated by the Keldysh action. See R. van Leeuwen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15, 1969 (2001).]
TIMEDEPENDENT DENSITYFUNCTIONAL THEORY (TDDFT)[according to E. Runge and E.K.U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984)]
11
![Page 12: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
[−12∇2vext r t ∫ r ' t
∣r−r '∣d r 'vxc r t ]i r t =i ∂
∂ ti r t
r t =∑if i∣i r t ∣2
vxc r t = Axc []
r t
THE TIMEDEPENDENT KOHNSHAM EQUATION
where
and
12
![Page 13: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Classical model of a photon
Induced dipole moment
t =−e0∣r∣0t 0t ∣r∣0
t = cos0 t
v r t =et ⋅r
O
H H
O
H H
O
H H
O
H Hℏ0
photont
EXCITEDSTATES ARE OBTAINED FROM LINEAR RESPONSE THEORY
13
![Page 14: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
i t =i∑ ji , j j cos t⋯
r i , r j=∑I≠0
2I0∣r i∣II∣r j∣0
I2−2
=∑I≠0
f I
I2−2
f I=23I ∣0∣x∣I∣
2∣0∣y∣I∣2∣0∣z∣I∣
2
Sumoverstates theorem (SOS)f
I
ωI
DYNAMIC POLARIZABILITY
14
![Page 15: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
xz =−2xA−B1/2 [2 1−A−B1/2ABA−B1/2]A−B1/2z
where
Aij kl= ,i , k j , l j− jK ij , kl
Bij , kl=K ij , lk
MATRIX EQUATIONS[Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited
by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific, 1995), p. 155]
15
![Page 16: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The poles of the dynamic polarizability are the solutions of the pseudoeigenvalue problem,
I F I=I2 F I
=A−B1/2ABA−B1/2
PSEUDOEIGENVALUE PROBLEM
where
In principle these equations take all spectroscopically allowed transitionsinto account when the functional is exact. This is not a problem becauseit is wellestablished that the number of solutions of such an equationcan exceed the dimension of the matrix Ω.
These equations are variously known as the RPA equations (which is really confusing) the "Casida equations"
16
![Page 17: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
THE TDDFT ADIABATIC APPROXIMATION
vxc r t = Axc []
r t
vxc r t =E xc [t ]
t
where t r =r t
Supposing that the reaction of the selfconsistant field to variationsin the charge density is instantaneous and without memory givesthe adiabatic approximation,
In general
17
![Page 18: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
PROBLEM
Theorem: The adiabatic approximation limits TDDFRT to 1e excitations.
Reasoning: Counting argument.
f xc = f xc
independent of frequency means that the eigenvalue problem hasexactly the same number of solutions as the number of single excitations.
Alternatively: The "Casida equation" includes TDHF. Make the TammDancoff approximation, B=0. The "Casida equation" thenreduces to CIS.
Note however that adiabatic TDDFT 1e excitations include somecorrelation effects (they are "dressed"). 18
![Page 19: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
PROBLEM2
Theorem: The adiabatic approximation limits the poles of the nonlinearresponse to 1e excitations.
Proof: Complicated, but basically it is related to the idempotency of theKS density matrix. Tretiak et Chernyak have shown that singularities of the adiabatic TDDFT 2nd hyperpolarizability occur only at double excitations which are 1e excitations*.
* S. Tretiak and V. Chernyak, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 8809 (2003).
=13 !
[ I II ⋯VIII ]
For example,
I =∑ , ,
−
−
−SSS
[−3 ] [−2 ] [− ]
19
![Page 20: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
EXCITATIONS IN RADICALS
i
v
a
i
v
a
i
v
a
i
v
a
i
v
a
i
v
a
∣ii v ⟩
∣ai v ⟩
a i
−a v
∣ii a ⟩ a i
∣i a v ⟩
−v i
∣iv v ⟩a v v i
∣i av ⟩
v i a
v
20
![Page 21: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
SPIN OPERATORS
S2=∑ P nS z S z−1
S z=12
n−n
wheren=∑ r
rP =∑ r
s s r
Single determinants are eigenfunctions of Sz but not necessarily of S2
Eigenfunctions of S2 are linear combinations of determinants with different distributions of the same number of up and down spins.
21
![Page 22: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
RADICAL EXCITED STATES |S,MS)
Doublets
Quadruplet
∣D2 ⟩= 1
6∣i v a ⟩∣i va ⟩−2∣iv a ⟩
∣Q ⟩= 1
3∣i v a ⟩∣i va ⟩∣iv a ⟩
"Extended Singles"(a type of doubles)
∣D1 ⟩= 1
2∣i v a ⟩−∣i va ⟩
∣ii a ⟩ ∣iv v ⟩
22
![Page 23: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
TDDFT, TDHF, AND CIS GIVE
Singlet Coupling
∣TC ⟩= 1
2∣i v a ⟩∣i va ⟩
∣D1 ⟩= 1
2∣i v a ⟩−∣i va ⟩
Triplet Coupling
Doublets
Neither a doublet nor a quadruplet!
MISSING: The quadruplet and one of the doublets!
∣ii a ⟩∣iv v ⟩
23
![Page 24: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
CONSEQUENCES FOR OPENSHELL MOLECULES
In the adiabatic approximation, Only transitions which conserve S2 have correct symmetry There are too few transitions conserving S2
intensity=1
ω(S)
ω(Ψ) ω(Ψ')
intensity =sin2 θ
intensity =cos2 θ
24
![Page 25: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
ALSO A PROBLEM FOR THE SPECTRUM OF CLOSEDSHELL MOLECULES
,ia
=S sinD cos '=S cos−Dsin
S
ia D
An example is found in the spectrum of butadiene, the smallest polyacetylene oligamer.
intensity=1
ω(S)
ω(Ψ) ω(Ψ')
intensity =sin2 θ
intensity =cos2 θ
25
![Page 26: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
I. Ionization Spectra as Excitation SpectraII. TDDFTIII. Green Functions from a Chemist's ViewpointIV. Polarization Propagator CorrectionsV. Conclusion
26
![Page 27: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO TDDFT
Carry out manybody theory with the KS system as reference system. Some people seek to calculate the exact v
xc and f
xc this way
[optimized effective potential (OEP) approach]. We seek manybody corrections to adiabatic TDDFT. There is
necessarily an interface problem between TDDFT and propagator (Green's function) theory.
Basic Idea :
Choices of Propagator Formalism :
Functional derivative (Schwingertype) Diagramatic (FeynmanDyson) EquationsofMotion (EOM) Superoperator
27
![Page 28: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
ALWAYS INCLUDE EXCHANGE, ALWAYS WORK WITH 4POINT QUANTITIES
Hugenholtz Brandow Feynman
+
28
![Page 29: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
SCHWINGER'S FUNCTIONAL DERIVATIVE FORMALISM
See e.g. G.Y. Csanak, H.S. Taylor, and R. Yaris, Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics, vol. 17, (Academic Press: New York, 1971), pp. 287361.“Green's function technique in atomic and molecular physics”
G 11 ' =G0 11 ' ∫G01222 ' G 2 ' 1 ' d2 d2 '
12=−i∫G−132G214 ;34v 41d4
R 121 ' 2 ' =G 12 ' G 21 ' ∫G 13G 3 ' 1 33 ' G 4 ' 4
R 4 ' 242 ' d3 d3 ' d4 d4 '
R 121 ' 2 ' =[ G 11 ' [U ]
U 2 ' 2 ]U=0
R 121 ' 2=i 11 ' U 2
generalized response function
BetheSalpeter equation
Dyson equation
selfenergy
2electron Green functionG212 ;1 ' 2 ' =G 11 ' ' G 22 ' −G 12 ' G 21 ' ∫G 13G 41 ' 34
G 34 ' R 3 ' 24 ' 2 ' d3 d3' d4 d4 '
29
![Page 30: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
W. von Niessen, J. Schirmer, and L.S. Cederbaum, Computer Physics Reports1, 57 (1984). “Computational methods for the oneparticle Green's function”
30
![Page 31: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
ALGEBRAIC DIAGRAMMATIC CONSTRUCTION (ADC)
pq =U p 1−K−C −1U q
U p=U p1U p
2⋯
C=C1C2⋯K is a diagonal matrix of orbital energy differences
Expand in electron interaction
Obtain Up and C by analyzing correspondence with finite order expressions
pq ;3=U p1 1−K −1U q
1U p2 1−K −1U q
1
U p1 1−K −1 Uq
2U p1 1−K −1 C11−K −1 U q
1O 4
This means that the selfenergy can go beyond the quasiparticle regimeto describe shakeup ionizations.
(See von Niessen et al.)
31
![Page 32: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
HEDIN'S EQUATIONS
L. Hedin, Phys. Rev. 139, A796 (1965). “New method for calculating the oneparticle Green's function with application to the electron gas problem”
W 12=v 12∫ v 13P 34W 42d3 d4
G 12=G012∫G01334G 42d3 d4
12=i∫G 13 324W 41d3 d4
P 12=−i∫G 13G 41 342d3 d4
123=1213∫ 12G 45
G 46G 75 673d4 d5 d6 d7vertex function
selfenergy
polarization
screened potential
Dyson equation
32
![Page 33: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
G0W0
G 12=G012∫G01334G 42d3 d4
12=i G012W 021
P012=−i G012G021
0123=1213vertex function
selfenergy
polarization
screened potential
Dyson equation
33
W 012=v 12−i∫ v 13G034G043W 042d3 d4
Could it possibly have any value for molecules?
![Page 34: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
M.E. Casida and D.P. Chong, Phys. Rev. A 44, 4837 (1989); Erratum, ibid, 44, 6151 (1991) "Physical interpretation and assessment of of the Coulombhole and screenedexchange approximation for molecules"
M.E. Casida and D.P. Chong, Phys. Rev. A 44, 5773 (1991). "Simplified Greenfunction approximations: Further assessment of a polarization model for secondorder calculation of outervalence ionization potentials in molecules" GW2 = GF2 + selfpolarization correction
G. Onida, L. Reining, R.W. Godby, R. Del Sole, and W. Andreoni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 818 (1995). “Ab initio calculations of the quasiparticle and absorption spectra of clusters: the sodium tetramer”
C.H. Hu, D.P. Chong, and M.E. Casida, J. Electron Spectr. 85, 39 (1997). “The parameterized secondorder Green function times screened interaction (pGW2) approximation for outer valence ionization potentials”
Y. Shigeta, A.M. Ferreira, V.G. Zakrzewski, and J.V. Ortiz, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 85, 411 (2001). “Electron propagator calculations with KohnSham reference states” GW2 works surprisingly well but need to use quasi energies in denominator
P.H. Hahn, W.G. Schmidt, and F. Bechstedt, Phys. Rev. B 72, 245425 (2005). “Molecular electronic excitations from a solidstate approach” 34
![Page 35: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
GW2
212=i G012W 0221
selfenergy
screened potential
35
W 0212=v 12−i∫ v 13G034G043v 42d3 d4
+Σ =
![Page 36: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Expt
GW
2IP in eV from Shigeta et al.
KS orbitals Pseudo HF orbital energies calculated from KS orbitals
36
![Page 37: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
I. Ionization Spectra as Excitation SpectraII. TDDFTIII. Green Functions from a Chemist's ViewpointIV. Polarization Propagator CorrectionsV. Conclusion
37
![Page 38: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
CHOICES OF PROPAGATOR FORMALISM
Functional derivative (Schwingertype) Diagramatic (FeynmanDyson) EquationsofMotion (EOM) Superoperator
Choose this because it is contains but is more versatile than the diagrammatic formalism (question of taste).
38
![Page 39: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
PROPAGATORS
⟨ ⟨ At ; B ⟩ ⟩=±it ⟨0∣AH t B∣0 ⟩i∓t ⟨0∣B AH t ∣0 ⟩
The upper sign is the usual (i.e. causal) propagator.The lower sign is the response function (retarded propagator).
AH t =eiHt Ae−iHt
⟨ ⟨ A; B ⟩ ⟩=∫−∞
∞ei t ⟨ ⟨ At ; B ⟩ ⟩
=∓∑I
⟨0∣A∣I ⟩ ⟨I∣B∣0 ⟩−Ii
±∑I
⟨0∣B∣I ⟩ ⟨I∣A∣0 ⟩I∓i
39
![Page 40: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
SUPEROPERATOR FORMALISM : LIOUVILLIAN
H A=[H , A] 1 A=ALiouvillian identity
AH t =eit H A
Specializing to the causal propagator allows us to write this as a commutator(in the limit ),
⟨ ⟨ A; B ⟩ ⟩= A∣ 1− H −1∣B
0
Note the introduction of the superoperator metric,
A∣B = A∣B 0= ⟨0∣[ A , B ]∣0 ⟩ (Number conserving
operators only)40
![Page 41: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
SUPEROPERATOR ALGEBRA : BASIS SET
T =T 1 , T 2
, T 3 ,
1e excitation and deexcitation operators,T 1=E1,
E1
2e excitation and deexcitation operators,
T 2=E2,
E2
E1=a i , b j , excitation
E1=i a , j b , deexcitation
E2=a b ji , c d lk ,
E2=i j ba , k l dc ,excitation
deexcitation41
![Page 42: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
OPENSHELL PROBLEMS
MCSCF calculation gives Ψ0 , Ψ
1 , Ψ
2 , etc.
Accuracy considerations may require inclusion of state transfer operators,
∣I ⟩ ⟨0∣ ∣0 ⟩ ⟨I∣
D.L. Yeager and P. Jorgensen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 65, 77 (1979).“A multiconfigurational timedependent HartreeFock approach”
42
in the superoperator basis sets.
![Page 43: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
SUPEROPERATOR ALGEBRA : EXCITATION ENERGIES
r i , r j=r i∣ 1− H −1∣r j
=r i∣T T ∣ 1− H∣T −1 T ∣r j =∑I r i∣T U I −I
−1 U I S1/2 S−1/2 T ∣r j
Sumoverstates theorem :=∑I
f I
I2−2
Tells us that the excitation energies are at the poles of the dynamic polarizability
T ∣ H∣T U I=I T ∣T U I
H U I=I S U I
So it suffices to solve
With the normalisationU I S U J=I , J 43
![Page 44: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
SUPEROPERATOR ALGEBRA : LÖWDIN (FESHBACH) PARTITIONNING
[ T 1∣ H∣T 1
T 1∣ H∣T 2
T 2
∣ H∣T 1 T 2
∣ H∣T 2 ] U I
1
U I2 =I [ T 1
∣T 1 T 1
∣T 2
T 2 ∣T 1
T 2 ∣T 2
] U I1
U I2
Can be rewritten as
T 1∣ H∣T 1
K I U I1=I T 1
∣T 1 U I
1
K I =[ T 1∣ H∣T 2
−I T 1∣T 2
]×[I T 2
∣T 2 −T 2
∣ H∣T 2 ]
−1
×[ T 2 ∣ H∣T 1
−I T 2 ∣T 1
]
where
BetheSalpeterequation
44
![Page 45: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO TDDFT : BASIC IDEA
KohnSham reference state 0=s⋯
A∣B = A∣B s[ A∣B − A∣B s ]= A∣B ss A∣B
T 1∣hs∣T 1
sK Hxc I U I1=I T 1
∣T 1 s U I
1
Then the exact “Casida equation” is
The TDDFT adiabatic approximation is
K Hxc I =T 1∣ H−hs∣T 1
ss T 1∣ H∣T 1
−Is T 1∣T 1
K I
K Hxc 0=T 1∣ H−hs∣T 1
ss T 1∣ H∣T 1
K 0
45
![Page 46: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
WHY “CASIDA'S EQUATION” IS NOT CASIDA'S EQUATION
same excitation energies same transition densities different transition density matrices
So what is wrong?
46
![Page 47: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
4POINT VERSUS 2POINT “BETHESALPETER” EQUATIONS
R 121 ' 2 ' =G 12 ' G 21 ' ∫G 13G 3 ' 1 33 ' G 4 ' 4
R 4 ' 242 ' d3 d3 ' d4 d4 '
or411 ' ;22 ' =s
411 ' ;22 ' ∫s411 ' ;33 ' K 33 ' ; 44 ' 444 ' ;22 ' d3 d3 ' d4 d4 '
Also21 ' ;2=s
21 ;2∫s41 ;3 f xc 3424 ;2d3 d4
21 ;2=411 ;22
So
f xc 12=∫s2−11 ;1 ' s
41 ' 1 ' ;33 ' K 33 ' ; 44 ' 444 ' ; 2 ' 2 ' 2−12 ' ; 2d1' d2 ' d3 d3 ' d4 d4 '
However Casida's equation is a 4point equation for the noninteractingsystem rather than a 2point equation, so we will continue with the provisionalidentification of “Casida's equation” and Casida's equation.
47
![Page 48: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO TDDFT : ALMOST EXACT EXCHANGE
T 1∣hs∣T 1
sK Hx U I1=I T 1
∣T 1 s U I
1
In this approximation,
K Hx=T 1∣ H−hs∣T 1
s
When correlation effects are neglected, the principal difference between theKS and HF orbitals is a unitary transformation among occupied orbitals.
48
![Page 49: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO TDDFT : ALMOST EXACT EXCHANGE
[i , ja , b a−i K ai , bjHx K ai , jb
Hx
K ia , bjHx i , ja , b a−i K ia , jb
Hx ] X I
Y I=I [i , ja , b 0
0 −i , ja , b] X I
Y I
K ai , bjHx =K ia , jb
Hx =i , j ⟨a∣hHF−hKS∣b ⟩−a , b ⟨ j∣hHF−hKS∣i ⟩ai∣∣ jb −ab∣∣ ji K ia , bj
Hx =K ai , jbHx =ib∣∣ ja − jb∣∣ia
Which is a generalization of the result,
K ai , aiHx = ⟨a∣hHF−hKS∣a ⟩− ⟨ i∣hHF−hKS∣i ⟩−aa∣∣ii
Given in X. Gonze and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4416 (1999).
T 1∣hs∣T 1
sK Hx U I1=I T 1
∣T 1 s U I
1
49
![Page 50: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO TDDFT : APPROXIMATIONS
K Hxc =T 1∣ H−hs∣T 1
ss T 1∣ H∣T 1
−s T 1∣T 1
K
Exact formulae
Simplifying approximations
0HF1)
2) HF=KS
T 1∣hs∣T 1
sK Hxc I U I1=I T 1
∣T 1 s U I
1
(In terms of perturbation theory, we really should be more careful to keep track of and be consistant in the order of perturbation.)
50
![Page 51: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO TDDFT : CONSEQUENCES
T 1∣hs∣T 1
sK Hxc I U I1=I T 1
∣T 1 s U I
1
K Hxc =T 1∣ H−hs∣T 1
sadiabatic TDDFTx
K propagator correction
K =T 1∣ H∣T 2
s [ T 2 ∣T 2
s−T 2 ∣ H∣T 2
s ]−1
T 2 ∣ H∣T 1
s
Note that the propagator correction contains the correlation part of the adiabatic coupling matrix, K(0).
51
![Page 52: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO TDDFT : PHILOSOPHY
The propagator correction should only include thoseexcitations missing in adiabatic TDDFT and trulynecessary for a correct physical description.
![Page 53: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO TDDFT : DRESSED TDDFT
[MZCB04] N.T. Maitra, F. Zhang, F.J. Cave, and K. Burke, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 5932 (2004). “Double excitations within timedependent density functional theory linear response” [CZMB04] R.J. Cave, F. Zhang, N.T. Maitra, and K. Burke, Chem. Phys. Lett. 389, 39 (2004). “A dressed TDDFT treatment of the 21Ag states of butadiene and hexatriene”
The present treatment is essentially equivalent to “dressed TDDFT” for the closedshell case :
2 [q∣ f xc ∣q ]=2 [q∣ f xcA q∣q ] ∣H qD∣
2
−H DD−H 00
Modifications are needed for the openshell case.
!
53
![Page 54: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO TDDFT : TDA
TammDancoff approximation (TDA)
T E=E1 , E2
, E3 ,
E1=a i , b j ,
Excitation operators only!
E2=a b ji , c d lk ,
The resultant formulae are closely related to configuration interaction (CI).
54
![Page 55: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
EXTENDED SINGLES TDDFT TDA
∣ii a ⟩∣iv v ⟩∣ai v ⟩∣i a v ⟩∣iv a ⟩ [a
−vva∣va Hxc
, av∣iv Hxc
, va∣ia Hxc
, va∣ia Hxc
,I
iv∣va Hxc
,v−i
iv∣iv Hxc
, iv∣ia Hxc
, iv∣ia Hxc
,J
ia∣va Hxc
, ia∣iv Hxc
,a−i
ia∣ia Hxc
, ia∣ia Hxc
,K
ia∣va Hxc
, ia∣iv Hxc
, ia∣ia Hxc
,a−i
ia∣ia Hxc
,L
I J K L H]
va i v ia i a i vv a
K pq , sr Hxc = pq∣rs Hxc
,= pq∣rs −
, ps∣rq
Mullikan ("charge cloud") notation ) :
Reduces to CIS when :
K pq , sr Hxc = pq∣rs Hxc
,= pq∣rs pq∣ f xc
,∣rs
55
![Page 56: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
U=[1 0 0 0 00 1 0 0 0
0 0 1
21
61
3
0 0 1
2−
1
6−
1
3
0 0 0 −2
61
3
]=
∣ii a ⟩∣iv v ⟩∣ai v ⟩∣i a v ⟩∣iv a ⟩
[ E G C C IG F D D JC D A B KC D B A LI J K L H
]EXTENDED SINGLES (XS)
UU will be blocked
56
![Page 57: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
ENFORCING THE BLOCK FORM
I= C−CJ= D−D
KL= A−AB−B
H=A A
2−
BB
2−
K−L2
K−L=?
Symmetry requires
UU=
∣ii a ⟩∣ai v ⟩∣D1⟩∣D2 ⟩∣Q ⟩ [
E G C C2
C− C−2 I6
C− CI3
G F D D2
D− D−2 J6
D− DJ3
C C
2D D
2A A
2
BB
2A− AB−B−2KL
23A− AB−BKL
6C C−2 I
6D D−2 J
6A− AB−B−2KL
23A A−B−B−2K−L −2K−L4 H
6A A−B−BK−L−2K−L−2 H
32C− CI
3D− DJ
3A− AB−BKL
6A A−B−BK−L−2 K−L−2 H
32A A−B−BK−L K−LH
3
]57
![Page 58: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
CLOSEDSHELL DRESSED TDDFT WOULD GIVE
∣ii a ⟩∣iv v ⟩∣ai v ⟩∣i a v ⟩∣iv a ⟩ [a
−vva∣va Hxc
, av∣iv Hxc
, va∣ia Hxc
, va∣iv Hxc
, iv∣aa iv∣va Hxc
,v−i
iv∣iv Hxc
, iv∣ia Hxc
, iv∣ia Hxc
,−ii∣va
ia∣va Hxc
, ia∣iv Hxc
,a−i
ia∣ia Hxc
, ia∣ia Hxc
, av∣av ia∣va Hxc
, ia∣iv Hxc
, ia∣ia Hxc
,a−i
ia∣ia Hxc
, av∣av iv∣aa −ii∣va −iv∣iv av∣av HFa
−HFi−ii∣aa
]va i v ia i a i vv a
I= C−C=va∣iv Hxc
,−va∣ia Hxc
,≠iv∣aa
J= D−D=iv∣ia Hxc
,−ia∣ia Hxc
,≠−va∣ii
This violates spinsymmetry!
We need symmetry to get symmetrypure excitations.
58
![Page 59: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
TDDFT TDA WITH XS EXCITATIONS
∣ii a ⟩∣iv v ⟩∣ai v ⟩∣i a v ⟩∣iv a ⟩ [ a
−vva∣va Hxc
, av∣iv Hxc
, va∣ia Hxc
, va∣iv Hxc
, va∣iv Hxc
,−va∣ia Hxc
,
iv∣va Hxc
,v−i
iv∣iv Hxc
, iv∣ia Hxc
, iv∣ia Hxc
, iv∣ia Hxc
,−ia∣ia Hxc
,
ia∣va Hxc
, ia∣iv Hxc
,a−i
ia∣ia Hxc
, ia∣ia Hxc
,K
ia∣va Hxc
, ia∣iv Hxc
, ia∣ia Hxc
,a−i
ia∣ia Hxc
,L
va∣iv Hxc
,−va∣ia Hxc
, iv∣ia Hxc
,−ia∣ia Hxc
,K L H
]va i v ia i a i vv a
The I and J blocks are completely determined by symmetry.A knowledge of H determines K and L.
K= A−B−H=a−i
ia∣ia Hxc
,−ia∣ia Hxc
,−H
L=B−AH=i−a
ia∣ia Hxc
,−ia∣ia Hxc
,H
59
![Page 60: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
CHOICE OF H
* Y. Shao, M. HeadGordon, and A.I. Krylov, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 4807 (2003). “The spinflip approach within timedependent density functional theory: Theory and applications to diradicals”
H=HFa−HFi
−ii∣aa 1) “dressed TDDFT” (recommended firstprinciples propagator correction)
2) translation rule (spinflip approach*)
H=a−i
i a∣ f Hxc∣ia ,
3) “physical intuition”
H=vai via∣ia Hxc
,−ia∣ia Hxc
,
Closedshell : N.T. Maitra, F. Zhang, R.J. Cave, and K. Burke, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 5932 (2004). “Double excitations within timedependent density functional linear response”Openshell : present work
60
![Page 61: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
CONCLUSION
Adiabatic TDDFT is limited to 1e excitations. Propagator corrections allow explicit incorporation of 2e excitations. The GonzeScheffler result has been generalized. “Closedshell dressed TDDFT” has been generalized. The basic ideas needed to extend “dressed TDDFT” to the openshell
case have been presented.
AP A P=P AATDDFT PP APC P
[ A BB A ] XY = [1 0
0 −1 ] XY A X= X
P = symmetry projector
TDA
ATDDFT
61
![Page 62: PROPAGATOR CORRECTIONS TO LINEAR · PDF fileMATRIX EQUATIONS [Mark E. Casida in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, Part I, edited by D.P. Chong (Singapore, World Scientific,](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030406/5a7ec9197f8b9a66798ecb56/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Jingang GuanSerguei TretiakXavier Gonze
Careful reading and comments :Kieron BurkeNeepa MaitraAnna Krylov
HELPFUL DISCUSSIONS
MANUSCRIPTM.E. Casida, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 044110 (2005). “Propagator Corrections to Adiabatic TimeDependent DensityFunctional Theory Linear Response Theory”
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
COST Chemistry Working Group Action D6ECOSNord project M02P03GdRCOMESGdRDFT
Lucia ReiningAngelo RubioAndrei Ipatov
62