promoting recycling: incentive based approaches and behavioral responses john thøgersen aarhus...
TRANSCRIPT
Promoting Recycling: Incentive Based Approaches and
Behavioral ResponsesJohn Thøgersen
Aarhus University, School of Business and Social Sciences
Denmark
Keep America Beautiful’s Fall Recycling Symposium: Re: Psychology, Making Recycling Second Nature
Economic instruments – waste
and recycling1. Waste taxes 2. Waste collection charges 3. Taxes on raw materials and products 4. Deposit-refund schemes 5. Subsidies and fiscal incentives
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
2
Source: Oosterhuis et al. (2009).
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
3
The rationale• Too much waste is generated and too little
recycled because relative prices are not reflective of total social costs – “Perverse subsidies” (Holliday & Pepper, 2001)
favor wasteful practices
• Change the relative costs and benefits of disposal/waste avoidance/recycling behaviors in order to make it more profitable for the individual to act in accordance with the collective interest
Relationship between waste generation and
waste policies
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
4Source: OECD (2011).
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
5
Themes
• Intended and non-intended effects of economic incentives
• Economic incentives and motivation “crowding out”
• Case: A pay-by-weight scheme for household waste
Intended and non-intended effects of
economic incentives
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
6
The development in the number of plastic bags,
Denmark
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
7
Source: http://www.plast.dk.
Household waste in Varberg, Sweden
Note: Pay-by-weight scheme introduced in 1995. (1997 estimate based on first 6 mo.)
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
8
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
9
Motivation “crowding out”
• Price incentives, being externally controlling, may undermine intrinsic motivation– Reduced feeling of self-determination and/or
competence leads to a shift from an internal to an external locus of causality
– Over-justification• a person’s own interest in the behaviour is discounted
when he or she is given an extrinsic reason for doing something they would have done anyway
(Lepper & Greene, 1978)
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
11
Crowding out with a negative net effect
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
12
(Frey & Oberholzer-Gee, 1997)
%
Motivation crowding out among voters in
Switzerland• A “referendum”
about accepting a nuclear waste repository in one’s community
• Some offered compensation, others not
• Compensation offered: $2,175 - $6,525 per individual and year
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
13(Gneezy & Rusticini, 2000)
Volunteers collecting money
for a cause• Volunteer collectors: 180 pupils divided into three groups– 1: Motivation speech– 2: Motivation speech and 1% of collection– 3: Motivation speech and 10% of collection
• Who collected the most money?– Group 1: Highest intrinsic motivation
• Who collected the least money?– Group 2: Crowding-out of intrinsic motivation
• Conclusion: Pay enough or don’t pay at all!
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
14(Weibel et al., 2007)
Effects of tangible awards on work
performance• Meta-analysis based on 51
studies/155 subgroups (n = 46.363)
• Experimental studies which a) address the effect of incentives on task performance, b) report “hard” performance measures, c) manipulate tangible incentives on an individual level, d) have a control group
• Effects on extrinsically motivated tasks = .42
• Effects on intrinsically motivated tasks = -.13
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
15
Norms and pro-social behavior
• Internalized extrinsic motivation• Prescriptive norms not necessarily
internalized– Subjective vs. Personal norms
• If a monetary incentive to promote environmentally desirable behavior renders (internalized) personal norms irrelevant due to overjustification, the behavioral impact of the regulation could be severely reduced
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
16
Can regulation enhance internalized
motivation?• If it increases targeted individuals’
perceived competence and/or their experienced autonomy with regard to the desired behavior
• If it creates or strengthens social and perhaps even personal norms regarding the promoted behavior – Regulation signals a social norm– Also more specific signals, e.g. about the
severity of the targeted problem and the individual’s responsibility for solving the problem
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
17
Norms and pro-social behavior
• Internalized extrinsic motivation• Prescriptive norms not necessarily
internalized– Subjective vs. Personal norms
• If a monetary incentive to promote environmentally desirable behavior renders (internalized) personal norms irrelevant due to overjustification, the behavioral impact of the regulation could be severely reduced
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
18
Hypotheses• If an economic incentive is offered, rewarded behavior
becomes more and punished behavior less prevalent (the price-effect)
• If an economic incentive is offered to promote a previously internally motivated behavior, the internalized motivation is undermined
• An economic incentive may enhance internalized motivation by strengthening perceived competence (self-efficacy) with regard to the desired behavior
• If an economic incentive scheme is introduced, pre-existing injunctive norms about the behavior are reinforced
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
19
Data
• Postal survey, random sample, collected in 2000– Response rate 41% – 1955 respondents
• From matched groups of municipalities – 3 w. and 3 w.o. pay-by-weight
scheme for garbage collection– Residents in home w. garden(Thøgersen, 2003)
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
20
Measures• Municipality group (w./w.o. pay-by-weight scheme)
• Knowledge of the type of garbage collection fee (1 item)
• Self-reported recycling behavior (3 items material recycling, 2 items composting)
• Opportunities for material recycling (1 item)
• Opportunities for composting (1 item)
• Personal norms (2 items material recycling, 2 items composting)
• Perceived self-efficacy (6 items material recycling, 2 items composting)
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
21
Data analysis method
• Structural equation modeling– possible to calculate measurement error
when a latent variable of interest is represented by multiple manifest variables
• Full Information Maximum Likelihood– Most efficient method to deal with missing
values because it minimizes the loss of information and, hence, statistical power, and leads to the most unbiased parameter estimates even with nonnormal data
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
22
Pay-by-weight and waste handling: Composting and
material recyclingN = 1955
1 The model is saturated
(Thøgersen, 2003)
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
23
Difference in material recycling
kg/ household/year
(Thøgersen, 2003)
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
24
Source-separation
R2 = .73; CFI = 1.00
(Know the)Pay-by-weight
system
.17Self-efficacy
.16
OwnComposter
.37
.32
PN(Obligation) .35
.78
.60
.66
.28
.33
(Thøgersen, 2003)
Pay-by-weight, motivation and
source-separation
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
25
Conclusions• Under realistic and not uncommon conditions the non-
economic motivational impacts of a (small) economic incentive can boost its effect on behavior over and above that of the direct price-effect– Households in municipalities with a pay-by-weight
scheme deliver more of their recyclable materials to recycling and compost more of their fruit and vegetable waste in the garden
– A large proportion – perhaps most – of the behavioral outcome cannot be attributed to a simple price-effect
– A substantial share of the effect of the incentive scheme is mediated through perceived self-efficacy and personal norms
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
26
Conclusions• Under realistic and not uncommon conditions the
non-economic motivational impacts of a (small) economic incentive can boost its effect on behavior over and above that of the direct price-effect– Households in municipalities with a pay-by-weight scheme
deliver more of their recyclable materials to recycling and compost more of their fruit and vegetable waste in the garden
– A large proportion – perhaps most – of the behavioral outcome cannot be attributed to a simple price-effect
– A substantial share of the effect of the incentive scheme is mediated through perceived self-efficacy and personal norms
Unintended side-effects
• Increased private burning of waste• Increased waste dumped in public
waste-receptors• Illegal dumping• Increased administrative costs
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
27
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
28
Wrap up• Prices often deviate from total social costs in a way
that favours non-sustainable consumption• Consumers are often sensitive to prices• There is a risk that the use of price incentives
undermines intrinsic motivation• But this is only an issue in non-market contexts
and where intrinsic motivation is an important factor
• A small performance-dependent price incentive may even strengthen personal norms in some cases
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
30
Additional reading for the involved
• Thøgersen, J. (2003). Monetary incentives and recycling: Behavioral and psychological reactions to a performance-dependent garbage fee. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 197-228.
• Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 589-611.
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
31
Pay-by-weight and waste handling: Composting and
material recyclingN = 1955
2 Unique (error) variances of items referring to the same material fraction are allowed to correlate
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
32
Correlations between the independent
variables
Note: Composting in upper and material recycling in lower triangle.
1 p > .05. In all other cases, p < .05.
19/6/08 Incentive Based Approaches and Behavioral Responses
33
Reddy (1991)
• In the USA, for example, '... the rate-making process has the following unintended, but nevertheless perverse, incentives': 1. Electricity profits increase with every
additional kWh sold; 2. Electricity profits decrease with every
additional kWh saved