project sec04 t3 spring 2006
TRANSCRIPT
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 1/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 2/107
The Final presentation
(CELEBRATION)
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 3/107
Done by:
1. AHMAD QURASHI
2. MOOSA ALI ALJOULAIH
3. FARIS ALRAJHI4. HASSAN ALBARQI
5. ABDULQADER AHMED
6. MOHAMED ALZAHRANI
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 4/107
introduction
Now it¶s the time to present the entire workof assignment L3 to show the details and
all work parts gathered in one presentation
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 5/107
Assignment L3-A
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 6/107
Context:
We are doing this assignment to discussthe problem that student do not knowenough about manufacturing. We use the
following steps we have learned todefined the problem :
1. Information gathering.
2. Problem definition.3. Evaluation of problems.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 7/107
The work:
1.Information Gathering:
In this case we used four steps :
Collect and analyzed information and data.
Talk with people familiar with the problem.
View the problem first hand Confirming all finding.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 8/107
Collect and analyzed information and
data:In this step we prepared a questionnaire.
This questionnaire have been given to:
1.Last year high school students(65 student).
2.Orientation year student in the engineering
college (27 student).It was as shown below:
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 9/107
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 10/107
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 11/107
Asking people who are familiar with theproblem :
We have asked Dr. Ibrahim Alawe why donot many student have knowledge aboutmanufacturing?
He answered, this problem is coming fromtwo reasons
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 12/107
1.1.DoctorsDoctors::
Some of them do not have knowledge about Some of them do not have knowledge about manufacturing themselves.manufacturing themselves. Or maybe they do not want to do any thingOr maybe they do not want to do any thing
more than what in the course topics.more than what in the course topics.
22.Students.Students:: Almost all of them preferring just to know what Almost all of them preferring just to know what
in the course topics.in the course topics.
Also their aim is just to pass the exam rather Also their aim is just to pass the exam ratherthan getting knowledge's.than getting knowledge's.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 13/107
View the problem f ir st hand
Member#1 many student do not like to get into manufacturing.
Almost all of them did not watch any program about
manufacturing.Member#2
Students don¶t care about manufacturing.
Lots of them didn¶t try any manufacturingexperiment.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 14/107
Member#3
Teachers don¶t know how to push studentsto have experience in manufacturing.
Member#4
some students are not officinal to deal withmanufacturing.
Member#5
The promotional features are not attractingstudents to like manufacturing.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 15/107
Conf irm:
We confirm that all findings by usingquestionnaire, the team members opinionsand asking prof. Ibrahim are correct.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 16/107
Statement / restatement process:
Statement:
Student don¶t have knowledge about manufacturing.
Restatement 1:
Some student don't like manufacturing.
Restatement 2:
Almost all of them did not watch any program aboutmanufacturing.
Restatement 33::
Lots of them didn¶t try any manufacturing experiments.Lots of them didn¶t try any manufacturing experiments.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 17/107
Present State Desired State techniquePresent State:
Students do not know enough about manufacturing.
Desired State:
Students know more information about manufacturing.Present State:
No exist a manufacturing project for the first year
engineering course.Desired State:
There is at least one manufacturing project for the first year engineering course.Present State:
No exist a manufacturing project for the secondary studentscourses (before they enter to University ).Desired State:
There is at least one course about a manufacturing projectfor the secondary students .
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 18/107
Explor ing the problem
Now we are facing the problem which is:
"student does not know enough aboutmanufacturing" and we are trying to explore thisproblem by using "Exploring the problem"
method to define that problem:
Identify available information Learn fundamentals Missing information
Hypotheses More information Define the real problem
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 19/107
Identify available information
From the information that we could obtain from the filedwe can summarize this few points:
± The high school students are not care abut industrialtechnologies more than the fun because the nature of theyouths.
± K.S.A is a young industrial region, so the community has to bemore educated with time. ± some manufacturing companies considers the work as a secret
so no body can know abut it even in general promotional wayslike TV or internet.
± Student all most sees the product or the device as a complex
thing, so he not even thinks abut it or how it works. ± The education authority does not support the subjects in school
by enough information abut manufacturing topics.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 20/107
Missing information:
I think there is missing part in this analysisthat the effect of the surroundings of thestudent environment and the amount or level of education of the family, because itcan effect on education side of the studentand his trend.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 21/107
More information:
Upon the information that we weregathering , it was discovered that there isa kind of attraction in some layers of students to the manufacturing technologyto improve there poor knowledge.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 22/107
Def ine the real problem
Identify ways to improve the industrial(manufacturing tech) education duringdifferent stages of learning from verybeginning.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 23/107
Evaluating the problem def inition
Have all the pieces of the problem been identified?Yes all the pieces of the problem have been identified Have all the constrains been identified?
Yes all the constrains have been identified What is missing from the problem definition?
the definition does not discuss the family effect to educate the
student. What is extraneous to the problem definition?
N/A Have you challenged the assumptions and information you were
given formulate the problem?YES I have challenged the assumptions and information you were
given formulate the problem. Have you distinguished fact from opinion?
Yes I have.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 24/107
:Discussion
By using problem definition for thisassignment we were being able tounderstand and define the real problem
(Students do not know enough about
manufacturing) where we used the threesteps : information gathering , problemdefinition and evaluation of problems. Once
we have defined the problem we can tomove forward toward the best solution byusing the idea generation technique.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 25/107
Assignment L3-B
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 26/107
Introduction:
This is the time to investigate a veryimportant part of L3 assignment. We willdiscuss the detail of the (L3-b) part byseveral categories such as IdeaGeneration, Multi-Voting, The Musts andwants.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 27/107
:Idea Generation
We began by brainstorming to initiate theideas alternatives of the artifactsindividually where classify that alternatives(artifacts) according to members, we canget the information as follows:
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 28/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 29/107
:Boggle MethodBy using
The repeated artifacts are (mobile, Microwave, Chair,lamp, Table, Oven, Camera, Telephone, TV,Glasses, curtain, Ladder, Toy car & Radio).
V oting (artifacts):- Multi
NO. of artifacts: 15 + 14 + 14 + 16 + 18 = 77
By using Boggle Method ( the repeated artifacts=17)so; (77-17= 60 artifacts)
NO. of votes after Boggle method: (60/3 = 20 votes)
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 30/107
The Final Artifacts :
After applying Multi-Voting as showing in the tableabove, we got the final Artifacts as follows:
1. Ladder ( 6 votes)2. Heater (6 votes)
3. Scoter (5 votes)4. Computer (5 votes)5. Telephone (5 votes)6. fan (5 votes)7. Curtain (4 votes )8. Blade (4 votes )
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 31/107
:(Musts)TheThis is the (Musts) that was deducing after the brain stormingfrom all teammates and use the Boggle Method to delete therepeated Musts:
1-The artifact must dissect into at least 10 pieces2-Not a weapon3-The artifact price must be less than 80 SR4-Instructor must approve it
5-Easy to assemble and disassemble6-we must be able to obtain the artifact that the team selects7-It must not have a dangerous material8-should not be pollutant for environment9-The product not have a sensitive parts
10-Not have a poisonous material11-use at home12-It must have a light weight13-The tools that will use for assembling must be cheap andsmall
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 32/107
Osborn¶s Checklist (Musts)
The Osborn¶s checklist techniques are used to generateadditional alternatives that are related to thosepreviously obtained where it is useful to help us build onone other's ideas as follows:
.the major parts not have a brittle glass........Adapt ?
.SR600 The artifact Price must be less than«.Modify ?The product not have a sensitive parts««Magnify ?
We can be expand as (No have electronic lamellar) andalso (No have complex electrical major parts).
(should not be pollutant for environment)..«Combine ?and (Not have a poisonous material)
We can combine them as ( safe in use ).
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 33/107
Voting ( Musts ):-MultiWe are going to use Multi-Voting to reduce the Musts asfollows: NO. of Musts =20NO. of votes after Boggle method:(20/3=6 votes)
The Final (Musts) : After applying Multi-Voting as showing in the table above, wegot the final Musts as follows :
The artifact must dissect into at least 10 pieces (5 votes)Not a weapon (5 votes)It must have a light weight (5 votes)The artifact price must be less than 600 SR (4 votes)Easy to assemble and disassemble (4 votes)The tools that will use for assembling must be cheap andsmall. ( 3 votes)
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 34/107
) :The (WantsWe states below some wants that we are selected for modifyingthe artifact. And we will reduce them by voting after increasingthem by random simulation technique.This is the (Wants) that have been deduced after the brainstorming from all teammates and use the Boggle Method todelete the repeated Wants:
1-Easy to maintain for faults2-Easy replacing for parts3-medium level of technology4-Available in market5-Non Electric equipment6-High level of reliability
7-Easy to use8-long life use9-Easy to handle10-Not have material that will affect the skin11-Low cost
12-company warranty
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 35/107
):W antsRandom Stimulation (
As we said in the beginning we increase the list of wants using Random stimulation technique to bereached 20 points at least.We are going to use this method which the random
word can be used to generate other words that canstimulate the flow of ideas as follows:Size wide Small parts of product.book read Guide line to use product.
food market Available spare parts for product.rigid safe product's parts make from plasticand aluminum materials
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 36/107
Voting ( Wants ) :-MultiWe are going to use Multi-Voting to reduce the wants to 4
Wants as follows: NO. of Wants = 20
NO. of votes after Boggle method : ( 20/3 = 6 votes )
The Final (Wants) : After applying Multi-Voting as showing in the table above, wegot the final Wants as follows :
Available in market (6 votes )Small parts of product (6 votes )
Easy replacing for parts ( 5 votes )Easy to handle ( 4 votes )
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 37/107
Conclusion:
Now we have achieved the main aim of assignmentof (L3-b) which represented by generation of ideasand find out several alternatives (artifacts), also wehave determine a lest of (musts) and (wants). As we did before that we have used a techniques to
manage them, we used brainstorming, multi voting,Osborn's checklist and random simulationrespectively. After the reduction of artifacts and wants using the
multi voting technique we drowse The boundary of the musts and wants and make them limited andmodified.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 38/107
Assignment L3-C
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 39/107
Introduction:
We are doing this assignment L3-C by usingthese techniques:
KT
DA table Adverse consequences table
Detailed cost for implementation process
to decide which project we will chose.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 40/107
The wor k:
KTDA table:
First of all, we should show the artifact,
musts and wants with votes. Note that"artifacts" and "Musts" and "Wants" will betaken from the previous assignment (L3-b)that have been done before.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 41/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 42/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 43/107
Next is the K.T. Decision Analysis Tables
as shown below, where it will show theartifact that fit with our constrains (Musts)and desires (Wants). (note: the artifact thatgets the highest score will be chosen)
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 44/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 45/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 46/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 47/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 48/107
Now the following table shows thefinal score for each artifact (note:
from KTDA table)
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 49/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 50/107
Adver se consequences table
Adverse consequences table is a usefultechnique to choose the best choice out of alternatives, where the difficulties that mayappear when chose any one are taking inaccount. In the adverse consequencestable, the artifact that gets the lowest
score will be chosen
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 51/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 52/107
After doing the adverse consequences tableit is easily to notice that the table gives thebenefit to choose the "Sccoter "
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 53/107
Detailed cost for implementation
process The price of any product is one of the most
important issues for the manufacturer and
the costumer too. The price plays a mainpart in marketing the product and in thedesire of taking it by the costumer.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 54/107
So after searching about implementationprocess cost for the two top artifacts whichis coming from "KTDA table" and " ACT" we will estimate the following table.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 55/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 56/107
Note: cost of time refer s to the cost of thetotal hour s the team member s wor kingon the project. Each member will take(15RS /h) and the total wor king hour s are:
1. Sccoter (2h)
2. computer (3h)
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 57/107
Selecting the artifact
After the K.T. Decision Analysis table, the³Adverse Consequences table´ and thecost estimation a discussion take placebetween the team members to analyze theresults so the right decision will be taken.The final decision was selecting the
³sccoter " that is shown below.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 58/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 59/107
Agreement
After decision take place between us"team 3" we can say now all of us areagree to chose the "Sccoter " as a project.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 60/107
Discussion :
This is the end of this assignment (L-3C), and itwas a good practice to use these techniques tochoose our artifact.
Finally, the chosen artifact was the "Sccoter " andnow everything ready for the next step of themain project, which is the implementationprocess that will be discussed in the next
assignment (L3-D)
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 61/107
Assignment L3-D
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 62/107
Introduction
This is the forth assignment in the project which
is required in this course .We will present the
K.T. Situation Analysis Table, then the Gantt
Chart, after that a simple drawing of the partstake a place here. Finally this assignment will
ends with a discussion.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 63/107
The W ork
To prioritize the tasks and activities that remain to be completed
for this project ,we will Perform a Situation Analysis (KTSA)
The tasks are shown as follows:
1- Inspect the artifact.
2- Owning the needed tools.
3- Dissecting the artifact.
4- Create sketches (drawings) of all the parts
5- Doing a Gantt Chart6- Assembling
7- Evaluation the artifact
K.T . Situation Analysis K.T . Situation Analysis
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 64/107
.T . S ituation Analysis.T . S ituation Analysis
We will apply the K.T. Situation Analysis technique on the tasks , where tasks beenWe will apply the K.T. Situation Analysis technique on the tasks , where tasks been
prioritize according to their importance : prioritize according to their importance :
K.T . S ituation Analysis K.T . S ituation Analysis
ProcessImpactTrendTimingTask
DAHHHInspect the artefact (Scoter)
DAHMHOwning the needed tools
DAHMHDissecting the artefact
DAHMMCreate sketches (drawings)
of all the parts
DAHHHDoing a Gantt Chart
PAMHLAssembly Plan
DA / PPAHMLEvaluation the artifact
The K.T S ituation Analysis shows t hat t he most i mportant task is doing a G antt Chart and t hen ,The K.T S ituation Analysis shows t hat t he most i mportant task is doing a G antt Chart and t hen ,
we will we will ins pect t he art ef act .ins pect t he art ef act .
Gantt chart :Gantt chart :
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 65/107
Gantt chart :Gantt chart :
A Gantt chart is a bar graph that shows when a specific task is to begin and how A Gantt chart is a bar graph that shows when a specific task is to begin and how
long it will take to complete . W e distributed the tasks between the team memberslong it will take to complete . W e distributed the tasks between the team members
by using the Gantt chart as follows :by using the Gantt chart as follows :
Gantt Chart Gantt Chart
SundayThursdayTuesdayMondaySundaySaturday
AllInspect the artefact
AbdulqaderOwning the needed tools
AllDissecting the artefact
Hasan &
Ahmad &
Mohammad
Create sketches
(drawings) of all the
partsAllHasan &
Ahmad &
Mohammad
Assembling
AllMousa &
FarisEvaluation the artifact
AllDoing a Gantt Chart
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 66/107
C onclusion
After we apply K.T. Situation analysis to
prioritize the tasks and activities , we make a
Gant chart to distribute these tasks on the teammembers . Now we are ready to do the last
assignment L3-e.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 67/107
Assignment L3-E
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 68/107
INTRODUCTION:
Now it¶s the time to make assembly planand evaluation for the entire artifact(scotter).
We make a (BOM) and K.T.PPA table. Also we make assembly plan. Finally wemake environmental impact evaluation.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 69/107
Bill of Mater ials (BOM)
A BOM is a table that lists each distinctpart and for each part includes thefollowing: the part name, a part number,
a photo of parts, the number of such partsin the artifact, and what the part is madeout of.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 70/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 71/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 72/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 73/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 74/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 75/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 76/107
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 77/107
Assembly Plan
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 78/107
21
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 79/107
43
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 80/107
65
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 81/107
87
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 82/107
109
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 83/107
1211
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 84/107
1413
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 85/107
1615
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 86/107
1817
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 87/107
2019
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 88/107
2221
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 89/107
2423
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 90/107
25
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 91/107
Assembly Plan
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 92/107
Testing the Artifact
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 93/107
Environmental impact statement:
Environmental impact statement or EIS is a documentdescribing the impacts or the reflection of aproposed action on the environment . also ,itdescribes ways to lessen or remove negative
impacts where each a proposed action (artifact )have a positive or negative impact or both .
Our artifact (scooter ) as any artifact have a positiveor negative impact ,
we will discuss these points carefully until weattempting to reach a decision about whether theproject should proceed.
Collecting data
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 94/107
Collecting dataTo Investigate the possible impact of the proposed
Project ,T
he First step:
we asked an expert aboutthe materials of parts of scooter. Then , wesurveyed number of people whether a parent and abig brother for the children who are using a scooter
or the children themselves. After we asked themand collected the data ,we asked an expert to gather some advices to mitigate the negative side of impact.
Our questions focused on some points which will showthe positive and negative impacts as a result of using our artifact (scooter) where we improve it froma hand use to an electrical use :
There is a battery may be thrown , It is considered as
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 95/107
a refuse will hurt the environment where there arematerials that incapable decomposition . Also
,there is an external charger consist of materialsthat incapable decomposition .Why did you buy a scooter ? What is the impactwhether positive or negative which you observed it?
It is consider as a gift or urge encourage children to agood work such as success in his study. Also , theelectrical use for scooter is more enjoyment and funfor children . But there is the negative side , such
as children maybe use scooter away from his family(example : they play in street ), this is may because to happen an accident . Also , during thebattery is charging maybe happen an electric shockfor children.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 96/107
: Healthy Side
There isn't fear if the family observe children .Without attention maybe children go toward thestreet ,this is may be cause to an accident . Also
, electrical wire maybe happen an electric shockor the mechanical parts maybe hurt their hands.
To avoid these problems , the adults whether aparent or brother must charge the battery
themselves . Also , they must observe childrenor children play at safe place.
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 97/107
Economically :
A lot of money can be gathered from it becausechildren like and enjoy scooter.
Also , cost of scooter isn't expensive . The
negative side is electrical charging of battery butthe battery have 6 voltages so the charger don'tuse up more electric current . Otherwise ,scooter is a good way to shopping with more
comfortable where children will use scooter during any shopping .
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 98/107
Noise pollution :
There isn't a great impact in this side , butthere is a low sound from motor of scooter may be don't take into consideration .
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 99/107
Analysis of the collected data :
Based on the data that been collected above, there are a positive impact more than anegative impact . Also ,we can avoid the
negative impact easily as mentionedpreviously.
Thus, it is conclude from this evaluation that
is possible to proceed in the project .
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 100/107
Cultural and Social Impacts :
The cultural and social impacts areimportant factors that we must take inconsideration in the evaluation of our
artifact (scooter) . we will discuss theseimpacts as follows :
The Cultural Impacts
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 101/107
The Cultural Impacts
the positive side:
1) learning children some of basics of drive2) encouragement a competition andprecession between children especially
the kinship.3) Buying scooter when child succeed in hisstudy or end reading any book where it isconsider as a incentive factor to more
learning .4) More familiar with other children wherechildren play and learn with each other .
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 102/107
:the negative sideChild maybe take more time when heplay by scooter. this is cause to a badlevel in school if he study . Also , he
prevent himself attendance into usefulprograms for children .
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 103/107
Social Impact:
Scooter improved social relations betweenfamily. We will discuss this impact asfollows :
Community Cohesion:
More familiar between family when child'sfather or brother give him scooter as a giftbecause children enjoy scooter and like it. Also , more familiar betweenneighborhood's children and their kinshiptoo.
C it F iliti d S i
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 104/107
Community Facilities and Services :Schools :it's not allowed in schools but it's allowed
in kindergartenReligious center s :not allowed in mosques toprevent noise also until they learn mosques'respect
Par ks, recreation center s : the best places touse itLibrar ies :not allowed to prevent a noiseHospitals :not allowed to use it but bring it as a
gift for a sick childEmergency Services : useless
Mobility (movement)
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 105/107
Mobility (movement)
It is small and light , you can carry it anywhere
Safetyscooter is not a very safe device without attentionfor child when he play at general parks , maybe
children go toward the street ,this is may because to an accident . Also , electrical wiremaybe happen an electric shock or themechanical parts maybe hurt their hands .But
with more attention all of these dangers willremove easily.
Fi ll th fl ti f tif t
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 106/107
Finally, we see the reflection of our artifact on our community:
How will this project influence communities ?from the previous evaluation ,as we have seenscooter improved social relations between family, child's neighborhood and their kinship
.Subsequently increasing the influence of our community.Will the project act as a tool for socialization byany mean?
Of course, it increases the level of socializationespecially children will be men in future.
l i
8/3/2019 Project Sec04 T3 Spring 2006
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-sec04-t3-spring-2006 107/107
conclusion
By this moment «.
assignment L3 has finished and we gotpride of our work. Now we feel that we
have just done a great effort (in our eyes) And we hope its mean something in yours.