project networking

Upload: ajay-malik

Post on 04-Apr-2018

234 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    1/28

    NETWORKING PROJECTACTIVITIES

    By

    Prof. (Dr.) Indrasen Singh

    Professor In-Charge, NICMAR

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    2/28

    Crashing and Updating

    o Direct cost of an activity

    o The direct cost of an activity depends upon the amount ofresources employed in the execution of the activity.

    o This is the cost of materials consumed, machines, equipment and

    labour employed to perform the activity.

    o In CPM projects, the direct cost of the activity is generally afunction of its duration.

    o By increasing the resources that is the activity cost, its duration

    can be decreased.

    o For Example, the white washing of a building can be done in 3days by a team of 4 workers.

    o If the number of men is decreased to 3, it takes 4 days.

    o Thus each time 12 man-days at a cost of say Rs. 360 (Rs. 30 per

    man-day) are required.

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    3/28

    o the number of men is further decreased to say 2, they may take

    say 7 days i.e. 14 man-days at a cost of Rs. 420.

    o On the other hand if the resources that is the men are increased to

    say 6, the work may takes 2.5 days or 15 man-days at a cost of

    Rs. 450.

    o The variation of activity cost with activity duration is illustrated

    in figure 1.

    o The variation of cost with time is rarely linear.

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    4/28

    2 2.5 3 4 5 6 7

    Activity Duration

    Figure 1

    420

    450

    Cost

    360

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    5/28

    Straight Line Approximation

    o The cost-time curve of the activity is rarely available. Generally,

    the normal and crash durations and costs of the activities are

    estimated.

    o Even if the cost-time curve of an activity is known, it is very

    cumbersome to analyse it for cost calculations.

    o For the convenience of computations, the cost-time curve,

    depending upon its curvature is approximated by straight lines.

    o If the curvature is less, a single straight line approximation can

    be made, as in figure 2 and if the curvature is more, multi-

    straight lines (segments) approximation can be adopted, as in

    figure 3.

    o The slope of the straight line (or a segment of line) gives the

    increase in cost per unit time for expediting the activity. This is

    called cost slope (CS).

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    6/28

    CT NT

    Figure 2

    CC

    NC

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    7/28

    CT2 CT1 NT

    Figure 3

    CC2

    CC1

    NC

    DuaratinCrashdurationNoraml

    CostNormalCostCrashCSSlopeCost

    ,

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    8/28

    o Indirect cost of the project.

    o The indirect cost of the project can be subdivided into tow parts;

    fixed indirect cost and variable indirect cost.

    o The fixed indirect cost is due to the general and administrative

    expenses, license fee, consultants fee, insurance cost, and taxes

    etc., and does not depend upon the progress of the project.

    o The variable indirect cost depends upon the project duration, but

    can not be attributed to individual activities. It consists of

    overhead expenses, supervision, interest on capital and

    depreciation, etc.

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    9/28

    Crashing the Network

    o A network can be crashed or contracted by identifying the least

    cost slope, critical activity and the float available on the paths

    parallel to the critical path.

    o The smallest amount of float on the parallel paths, determines the

    duration by which the selected activity can be crashed without

    making it non-critical.

    o This process is continued, until either all the activities become

    critical or all activities with cost slopes less than the indirect cost

    are crashed.

    o In the former case, that is when all activities become critical, the

    project duration can be reduced by crashing more than one

    activities in parallel.

    o The combination of activities, which together give the least cost

    slope less than the indirect cost, are selected for crashing.

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    10/28

    o They are crashed as far as they can without making any activity

    non-critical.

    o The process is continued, until the total cost of the project does

    not start increasing.

    o The project duration corresponding to the minimum cost is the

    optimum duration.

    o The crashing process can be continued if required, until the

    minimum possible duration is reached.

    o Example:

    o Let us consider the following time and cost data for a project

    network.

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    11/28

    Activity Normal

    Duration (Days

    Cost (Rs.) Crash Duration

    (Days)

    Cost (Rs.)

    1-2

    1-3

    2-4

    2-5

    3-5

    4-7

    5-6

    6-7

    6-8

    7-98-9

    15

    7

    9

    0

    5

    6

    8

    12

    10

    1010

    10,000

    7,000

    16,000

    0

    6,000

    8,000

    7,000

    8,000

    9,500

    8,50015,000

    11

    5

    6

    0

    2

    3

    5

    8

    7

    76

    12,400

    8,400

    20,500

    0

    9,000

    10,400

    8,350

    9,400

    10,850

    10,00018,000

    o The indirect cost of the project is Rs. 1,000 per day, and it is

    required to determine the optimum project duration.

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    12/28

    o The project network corresponding to the normal activity times is

    shown in figure 4.

    o The normal activity times, along-with crash activity times in

    parenthesis are written along the activity arrows. The cost slope

    of each activity is computed in Table 1 and the same is shown in

    the network below the corresponding activity arrow.

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    13/28

    ActivityDuration

    (Days) Direct Cost

    T C

    Cost

    slope

    C/T

    Nor

    mal

    Cra

    sh

    Normal Crash

    1-2

    1-3

    2-42-5

    3-5

    4-7

    5-6

    6-7

    6-8

    7-9

    8-9

    15

    7

    90

    5

    6

    8

    12

    10

    10

    10

    11

    5

    60

    5

    3

    5

    8

    7

    7

    6

    10,000

    7,000

    16,0000

    6,000

    8,000

    7,000

    8,000

    9,500

    8,500

    15,000

    12,400

    8,400

    20,5000

    6,000

    10,400

    8,350

    9,400

    10,850

    10,000

    18,000

    4

    2

    3-

    -

    3

    3

    4

    3

    3

    4

    2400

    1400

    4500-

    -

    2400

    1350

    1400

    1350

    1500

    3000

    600

    700

    1500-

    -

    800

    450

    350

    450

    500

    750

    Table: 1

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    14/28

    0 0 15 15 24 29

    107

    35 3545 45

    15 15

    23 23

    33 35

    1

    9

    8

    765

    4

    3

    215(11)

    600

    5(5)

    750

    9(6)

    450

    7(5)

    350

    10(7)

    500

    12(8)

    1500

    6(3)

    800

    8(5)

    450

    10(6)10(7)

    Solution

    Figure 4

    700

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    15/28

    0 0 15 15 24 27

    107

    33 3343 43

    15 15

    23 23

    33 33

    1

    9

    8

    765

    4

    3

    215(11)

    600

    5(5)

    750

    9(6)

    450

    7(5)

    350

    10(7)

    500

    10(8)

    1500

    6(3)

    800

    8(5)

    450

    10(6)10(7)

    700

    Figure 5

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    16/28

    0 0 15 15 24 24

    107

    30 3040 40

    15 15

    20 20

    30 30

    1

    9

    8

    765

    4

    3

    215(11)

    600

    5(5)

    750

    9(6)

    450

    7(5)

    350

    10(7)

    500

    10(8)

    1500

    6(3)

    800

    5(5)

    450

    10(6)10(7)

    700

    Figure 6

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    17/28

    0 0 12 12 21 21

    77

    27 2737 37

    12 12

    17 17

    27 27

    1

    9

    8

    765

    4

    3

    212(11)

    600

    5(5)

    750

    9(6)

    450

    7(5)

    350

    10(7)

    500

    10(8)

    1500

    6(3)

    800

    5(5)

    450

    10(6)10(7)

    700

    Figure 7

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    18/28

    0 0 12 12 21 21

    77

    27 2734 34

    12 12

    17 17

    24 24

    1

    9

    8

    765

    4

    3

    212(11)

    600

    5(5)

    750

    9(6)

    450

    7(5)

    350

    7(7)

    500

    10(8)

    1500

    6(3)

    800

    5(5)

    450

    10(6)7(7)

    700

    Figure 8

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    19/28

    0 0 11 11 20 20

    66

    26 2633 33

    11 11

    16 16

    23 23

    1

    9

    8

    765

    4

    3

    211(11)

    600

    5(5)

    750

    9(6)

    450

    6(5)

    350

    7(7)

    500

    10(8)

    1500

    6(3)

    800

    5(5)

    450

    10(6)7(7)

    700

    Figure 9

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    20/28

    0 0 11 11 20 20

    66

    24 2431 31

    11 11

    16 16

    23 23

    1

    9

    8

    765

    4

    3

    211(11)

    600

    5(5)

    750

    9(6)

    450

    6(5)

    350

    7(7)

    500

    8(8)

    1500

    4(3)

    800

    5(5)

    450

    8(6)7(7)

    700

    Figure 10

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    21/28

    o The critical path of the normal network is 1-2-5-6-7-9 and the

    normal project duration is 45 days.

    o The sum of normal costs of the activities is Rs. 95,000.

    Therefore, total project cost = 95,000 + 1000 x 45 = 1,40,000

    o On the critical path the least cost activity is 6-7. On the

    parallel path 6-8-9, there is a slack of 2 days while on path 2-

    4-7 there is a slack of 5 days. Activity 6-7 is thus crashed by 2

    days. The project duration becomes 43 days.

    Total cost = 1,40,000 + 350 x 2 2 x 1,000 = 1,38,700.

    The corresponding network is given in figure 5.

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    22/28

    o Activity 5-6 can be crashed by 3 days. The project duration

    becomes 40 days.

    Total Cost = 1,38,700 + 3 x 450 - 3 x 1,000 = 1,37,050.

    The corresponding network is given in figure 6.

    o Activity 1-2 can be crashed by 3 days project duration becomes

    37 days, and

    Total Cost = 1,37,050 + 3 x 600

    3 x 1,000 = 1,35,850.The Corresponding network is shown in figure 7.

    o Activity 6-8 and 7-9 combined together can be crashed by 3

    days. With this crashing, the project duration becomes 34 days

    and Total cost = 1,35,850 + 3 x 950

    3 x 1,000 = 1,35,700.The corresponding network is given in figure 8. Thus, for the

    given cost data, the optimum project duration is 34 days and the

    optimum project cost is Rs. 1,35,700.

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    23/28

    Updating the Project

    To illustrate the procedure of updating, let us consider the

    network shown in figure 11.

    00 108

    1715

    2424

    88

    1210

    3636

    2016

    1818

    74

    52

    3 9861

    8

    8 8

    8

    1016

    6

    10

    57

    Figure 11

    12

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    24/28

    Suppose the progress of work is checked after 15 days, that is at

    the end of 15 days, and it is observed that:

    - Activities 1-2, 1-3, 1-4 and 2-5 are completed.

    - Activity 2-6 is in progress and needs 2 days more.

    - Activity 3-6 is in progress and needs 5 days more.

    - Activity 4-7 is in progress and needs 1 day more and

    - Activity 5-9 is in progress and needs 14 days more.- Also it is estimated that due to the non-availability of fast setting

    cement, activity 7-8 will take 12 days while due to the arrival of

    a new crane, activity 8-9 will now require only 10 days.

    This information can be put into a tabular form, as given below:

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    25/28

    Activity Status Time Required

    1-2

    1-31-4

    2-5

    2-6

    3-6

    4-7

    5-9

    6-8

    7-8

    8-9

    Completed

    CompletedCompleted

    Completed

    In Progress

    In Progress

    In Progress

    In Progress

    Not Started

    Not Started

    Not Started

    0

    00

    0

    2

    5

    1

    14

    6

    12

    10

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    26/28

    Solution

    o The method, which is comparatively more convenient, is to

    bunch all the activities completed up to the date of review, into

    one activity and represent this by one arrow called the elapsedtime arrow.

    o All the activities in progress will burst from the end node of the

    elapsed time arrow and their durations will now be the times

    required for their completion, from the date of review. Theremaining activities will follow in their precedence order and will

    carry their revised time estimates.

    o The nodes in the new network will be numbered in a different

    fashion.o Then following the forward and backward computations the

    network can be analysed.

    o Activity 10-20 in figure 12 represents the elapsed time of 15

    days.

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    27/28

    o Activity 20-60, 20-65, 20-70 and 20-90 represent the activities 2-

    6, 3-6, 4-7 and 5-9 of the previous network, which respectively

    require 2,5,1 and 14 days.

    o The critical path for the revised project network is 10-20-70-80-90, which gives the project duration of 38 days.

  • 7/29/2019 PROJECT NETWORKING

    28/28

    o Thus the updated version of the project is of increased duration,

    with some change in critical activities of the project.

    00

    20

    3838

    70

    1515

    65

    2220

    10

    221760

    2828

    80 90Elapsed Time

    15

    14

    1616

    5 610

    2