project management update nci steering committee meeting july 30, 2003 minneapolis, mn
TRANSCRIPT
Participating NCI States (FY03)
NDAK
HI
WA
OR
ID
MT
WY
ND
SD
NE
CAUT
NV
AZ
CO
NM
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
WI
IL IN
MO
AR
MI
OH
KY
TN
MS
LA
AL GA
FL
SC
NC
VAWV
PA
NY
MEVTNH
MD
DC
DE
NJCT
MA
RI
PR
Orange County
Interested Participants…
NCI participation proposed in three Real Choices System Change grants Montana North Dakota Washington D.C.
State of California plans to join after one-year ramp up period
Status of Phase V (FY2003)Data SubmissionType of Data # states in by
6/30/2003% of expected data (FY03)
% of expected data (FY02)
Consumer Survey 17 94% (17/18) 100% (15/15)
Family Survey 13 93% (13/14) 93% (13/14)
Family Guardian Survey 9 90% (9/10) 86% (6/7)
Children Family Survey 5 100% (5/5) 83% (5/6)
Employment Data 8 89% (8/9) 100% (10/10)
Staff Stability Data 4 67% (4/6) 83% (5/6)
Board Representation 4 57% (4/7) 86% (6/7)
Crimes 3 50% (3/6) 100% (4/4)
Restraints 3 43% (3/7) 33% (2/6)
Injuries 2 33% (2/6) 43% (3/7)
Deaths 5 63% (5/8) 71% (5/7)
New Website: www.hsri.org/nci
Highlights…
New “Join NCI” page has updated introductory materials
Reports page re-organized
Presentations posted on separate page
“NCI Tools” State contact info, web links, state reports Separate section on interviewer training Separate section for meeting minutes
Consumer Survey
New survey forms, codebooks, Access file have been posted to websiteOnly minor technical revisions madeSubcommittee will convene over next few months to address more substantial revisionsGoal is to release new forms beginning of calendar year 2004Preliminary report – draft to be distributed this week
How is NCI data used?
Setting goals & strategic planningSetting priorities for quality improvement, incorporate into Quality Management plansBudget requests to Governor and legislatorsHelps shape data reporting systems (e.g., incidents, mortality)Stakeholder advisory committees (Quality Councils) being formed to review results and make recommendations to state agencies
How are results disseminated?
Many states compile reports of state results vs. national results and post on websitesSome states beginning to look at provider level results & share with providersSummaries shared with families who filled out surveys (AZ)Simplified version of Consumer Survey report for self-advocates (VT)
What have other states added?
Family survey questions: Fair hearing/complaint process (RCOC) Service coordinator turnover (RCOC) Early start (0-3) survey (RCOC) Support needs and future planning (CT)
Consumer survey questions: Assistive technology (DE) Case management supplement (WA, HI, MA, IN, WY) Person-centered planning, additional health data (HI) Modified for people with chronic mental illness (IA) Health status supplement (NC)
What areas are states interested in expanding or developing?
Additional health and safety indicatorsQuestions about self-directed servicesInvolvement of self-advocatesRisk managementProvider capacityProvider performance measuresModifications to adapt survey for people with different communication stylesDirect support worker salaries, benefits, credentialingCrisis services
Trend Analysis
Beginning to look at trends over past three yearsFive states collected Consumer Survey data annually for three years Connecticut Kentucky North Carolina Pennsylvania Rhode Island
CM helps get what person needs…
90% 88%83% 83%
78% 78%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
5 state average All state average
FY00 FY01 FY02
Goals for this year
Develop Core Health Status Supplement Awarded grant from WV DD Council Applied for CDC grant Will incorporate work done by North Carolina
Quarterly e-newsletters for NASDDDS membership
Prepare .ppt templates for states to present results
Finalize revised set of Core Indicators
Summary of State Profiles
Coming soon…
New “Trainer’s Guide” for Consumer Survey, with Powerpoint slides
Indicators and system data protocols will be updated following meeting and posted to website
Data Submission Forms for FY04…please fill out and return!