project management sarah pearce 3 september gridpp21

Project Management

Sarah Pearce 3 September

GridPP21

2/9/08 2GridPP21 Swansea

Reporting – GridPP2


Reporting – GridPP3 metrics

GridPP Quarterly Report OKArea Operations Close to targetQuarter Q2 2008 Not OKReported by Jeremy Coles Not yet able to be measured

Suspended

Metric no. Description Source Owner Target Q-2 Q-1 Q Comment

2.1.1Fraction of UK sites in Production

Manual - Information available from GOCDB Jeremy Coles

Number of GridPP sites in certified status. Require 100% 95%

Taking sites as distinct entites (19/20)

2.1.2 Number of supported VOsManual - Tier-2 quarterly reports and Tier-1 Jeremy Coles

Sum of unique VOs supported across GridPP sites - target 4 LHC + 5 other 40 Includes regional VOs

2.1.3Proportion of available jobslots used From APEL accounting Jeremy Coles

Jobslots used/ jobslots provided - 80% 37.40%

Misleading given that some shared sites are >100%

2.1.4 GridPP KSI2K AvailableManual sum over entries in quarterly reports Jeremy Coles

Total GridPP KSI2K nominally available at the end of the last quarter. Target WLCG pledge 14418.7

Is this hrs or raw KSI2K. Assuming raw. Also it is at the end not an average.

2.1.5 GridPP disk storage availableManual sum over entries in quarterly reports Jeremy Coles

Total TB of disk storage nominally available from GridPP at the end of the last quarter. Target WLCG pledge 2382.5

Tier-1 entry from http://www.gridpp.rl.ac.uk/stats/dac/RAL/year.shtml (includes buffers and hot spares). T2 figure = 1262.3. T1 = 1120.2 TB.

2.1.6 Job success rates

Based on the user jobs submitted by Steve (http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~lloyd/gridpp/uktest.html) Jeremy Coles 95% 95.50%

2.1.7UK contribution to LHC experiments

Manual sum over data provided by accounting portal Jeremy Coles

Percentage of jobs run by LHC V0s processed in UK in last quarter. Target is as pledged shares (11%?) 14.80%

2.1.8 Deployment team meetings Manual review of UK agenda page Jeremy Coles

Deployment team meetings take place on average biweekly Ok Take place weekly

2.1.9UK wide deployment support active

Manual review of UK agenda page Jeremy Coles 10 per year Ok

2.1.10GridPP deployment web-pages up-to-date

Web-page time stamps indicate updates Jeremy Coles

Static deployment web-pages updated within last 6 months Not ok

Not all pages have been updated within last 6 months.

2.1.11 Training needs addressed Jeremy Coles

Sysman meetings and Training events held. - 2 per year currently Ok

WLCG workshop had tutorials. HEPSYSMAN has training on Nagios.

2.1.12 GridPP site response to tickets Jeremy Coles Number of flagged tickets <3

As far as I can tell this is functioning. As yet GGUS does not have metrics available.

2.1.13 Number of sites on VO blacklists Jeremy ColesLess than 10 site days per quarter 3.40%

Based on 29 CE entries. (88+210+0)/87 = 3.4. Note that LHCb may not currently blacklist sites!


Reporting – GridPP3 milestones

GridPP Quarterly Report CompleteArea Security OverdueQuarter Q2 2008 Not yet dueReported by Tony Doyle Suspended

Milestone no. Description Owner Due date Date complete Evidence Comment2.2.3 Complete SSC3 at UK Tier 2s Mingchao Ma 31-Oct-082.2.4 Security review of Tier 2 sites Mingchao Ma 31-Mar-092.2.5 GridPP security workshop Mingchao Ma 31-Jul-09

2.2.6GridPP Tier 2 security survey and report Mingchao Ma 31-Jul-10

2.2.8 Security Assessment plan Linda Cornwall 31-Jul-08

2.2.9Security Vulnerability and risk management strategy Linda Cornwall 31-May-09

2.2.10 Security Policy integration Dave Kelsey 31-Jan-102.2.11 Review of GridPP Security Dave Kelsey 30-Jun-10

2.2.12Security recommendations for the future Dave Kelsey 31-Jan-11

2.2.13 GridSite software report Andrew McNab 30-Mar-092.2.14 Security report Sergey Dolgobrodov 30-Mar-092.2.15 GridSite software report Andrew McNab 30-Mar-102.2.16 Security report Sergey Dolgobrodov 30-Mar-102.2.17 GridSite software report Andrew McNab 30-Mar-112.2.18 Security report Sergey Dolgobrodov 30-Mar-11


Reporting – GridPP3 manpower

GridPP Tier-2 Quarterly ReportTier-2QuarterReported by

Effort (FTE)

Site Name Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 1 Month 2 Month 3

Durham P RoffeDurham D Ambrose-GriffithEdinburgh S SkipseyEdinburgh S ThornEdinburgh M BakerEdinburgh G CowanGlasgow D MartinGlasgow A ElwellGlasgow M KenyonGlasgow G Stewart

Total

GridPP Funded Unfunded

ScotGrid2008Q2Graeme Stewart


GridPP 3 reporting - narrative

GridPP Quarterly ReportArea LHCbQuarter Q2 2008Reported by Glenn Patrick/ Raja Nandakumar

Progress over last Quarter

Work area

CASTOR

Note:To get multiple lines per box use Alt-Return

General Risks

Insitute or area specific risks

Problems/Issues

Ran well for a long period of time through CCRC08Concerns with reliability, especially when running many jobs (> about 500) at the same time.

Successes

Data redundancy, different T1 sites have very different configurations

Risk Mitigating Action

SE not stable at various T1 sites

Risk Mitigating Action

Security incidents compromising VOUser isolated using LHCb and site logs and quick action taken. Computing shifters and supervisors

identified to monitor LHCb and grid systems

RAL CE / batch system problemsDepends on nature of problem. Take action as appropriate either on LHCb or T1 (or both) side.

RAL Castor problemsWait for problems to be solved / backup solution to be

in place. Meanwhile, use other T1s as failovers


GridPP3 reporting – Tier2s

Tier-2QuarterReported by

Current Site Status Data Availability Measures Potential (CPU and wall-clock)

SiteService Nodes

Worker Nodes

Local Network

ConnectivitySite

Connectivity SRM

Hours in scheduled

maintenance

Steve Lloyd SAM availability

Steve Lloyd SAM reliability

SLL targeted ATLAS (UK test) 04/2008 05/2008 06/2008

quarter total

Lancaster Glite3.1 Glite3.1 1Gb 1Gb 2.2 19 93% 93% 92% 348624 360244.8 348624 1057492.8Liverpool Glite3.1 Glite3.1 1Gb 1Gb 2.2 0 96% 96% 91% 622800 643560 622800 1889160Manchester Glite3.1/glite3.0Glite3.1/glite3.01Gb 10Gb 2.2 24 (1 cluster) 86% 86% 79% 1555200 1607040 1555200 4717440Sheffield Glite3.1 Glite3.1 1Gb 1Gb 2.2 7 95% 95% 92% 131400 135780 131400 398580

Current Resources Available

SiteCPU

(kSI2K)Storage

(TB) CPU (kSI2K) Storage (TB) CPU (kSI2K) Storage (TB) CPU (kSI2K) Storage (TB) CPU (%) Storage (%)Lancaster 8 2 476.2 80 484.2 82 510 86.7 93% 95%Liverpool 270 10 595 34.5 865 44.5 604 80.3 99% 55%Manchester 0 0 2160 162 2160 162 1340 372.5 161% 43%Sheffield 0 0 182.5 4.5 182.5 4.5 182.5 3 100% 150%

Total 3413.7 281 3691.7 293 2636.5 542.5 129% 52%

GridPP Tier-2 Quarterly ReportNorthGrid08Q2A. Forti

Promised (GridPP MoU)Non LCG GridPP Total Available Promised (GridPP MoU)

GridPP Tier-2 Quarterly ReportTier-2 NorthGridQuarter 08Q2Reported by A. Forti

Q-2 Q-1 Current Q-2 Q-1 Current Q-2 Q-1 Current Q-2

4.x.1% of promised (by that time) disk available to GridPP 100% 95% 55% 43%

4.x.2 % of promised (by that time) CPU available 100% 93% 99% 161%

4.x.3Average SAM (SLL page) availability performance over the last quarter

95% averaged over sites in Tier-2 93% 96% 86%

4.x.4Average SAM (SLL page) reliability performance over the last quarter


4.x.5Average SLL targeted ATLAS test performance (UK test)


4.x.6 Average SLL SE test performance95% averaged over sites in Tier-2

4.x.7 Approx. CPU utilisation (wall clock time) 50% 46% 46% 15%

4.x.8 Approx. CPU utilisation (CPU time) 50% 48% 35% 17%

4.x.9 Percentage of disk used 50% 48% 5% 22%

4.x.10 Number of technical meetings held in last quarter 200% 0 0 0

4.x.11Number of management meetings held in last quarter 100% 0 0 0

4.x.12 Tier-2 meeting LCG MoU service levels

Tier-2 responded to all LCG problems covered by the GridPP MoU in the agreed times over the last quarter

4.x.13 Quarterly operational performance review

Tier-2 quarterly reports available by one month after the end of the quarter 1 1 1

4.x.14 Middleware upgrading

100% of sites in Tier-2 upgrade to the timetable agreed by the DB

4.x.15 Network is OK at all sites TBD 1 1 1

OKClose to targetNot OKNot yet able to be measuredSuspended

Metric no. Description TargetLancaster Liverpool Manchester Sheffield

Tier-2QuarterReported by

Supported VOs

Site alic

e

atla

s

bab

ar

bio

med

calic

e

cam

on

t

cdf

ced

ar

cms

dte

am

dze

ro

esr

Lancaster 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Liverpool 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Manchester 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Sheffield 1 1 1 1 1

Total 3 4 3 4 2 2 2 2 4 4 3 2Place a 1 in the relevant cells. Extend as necessary

Storage resource in use per VO (TB)

Site alic

e

atla

s

bab

ar

bio

med

calic

e

cam

on

t

cdf

ced

ar

cms

dte

am

dze

ro

esr

Lancaster 39 0.12 0.5Liverpool 1.9 0 0.2Manchester 25.2 10.8 0.2Sheffield 0.7 0 0Total 0 66.8 10.9 0 0 0 0 0.9 0 0 0 0

GridPP Tier-2 Quarterly ReportNorthGrid08Q2A. Forti


Project Map GridPP2

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.100 0.101 0.102 0.103 0.104 0.105 0.106 0.107 0.108 0.109 0.110 0.111 0.112 0.113 0.114 0.115 0.116

0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.117 0.118 0.119 0.120 0.121 0.122 0.123 0.124 0.125 0.126 0.127 0.128 0.129 0.130 0.131 0.132 0.133

0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.134 0.135 0.136 0.137 0.138 0.139 0.140 0.141 0.142 0.143 0.144 0.145 0.146 0.1470.52 0.53 0.54 0.55 0.56 0.57 0.58 0.59 0.60 0.61 0.62 0.63 0.64 0.65 0.66 0.67 0.68

2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 3.1.4 3.1.5 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.5 5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.3 5.1.4 5.1.5 6.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 6.1.5

1.1.5 2.1.6 2.1.7 2.1.8 2.1.9 2.1.10 3.1.6 3.1.7 3.1.8 3.1.9 3.1.10 4.1.6 4.1.7 4.1.8 4.1.9 4.1.10 5.1.6 5.1.7 5.1.8 5.1.9 5.1.10 6.1.6 6.1.7 6.1.8 6.1.9

2.1.11 2.1.12 3.1.11 3.1.12 3.1.13 4.1.11 4.1.12 5.1.11 5.1.12

2.2 3.2 4.2 5.2 6.2 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 2.2.5 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.2.5 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.2.5 5.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3 5.2.4 5.2.5 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 6.2.4 6.2.5

1.2.5 2.2.6 2.2.7 2.2.8 2.2.9 2.2.10 3.2.6 3.2.7 4.2.6 4.2.7 4.2.8 4.2.9 4.2.10 5.2.6 5.2.7 5.2.8 5.2.9 5.2.10 6.2.6 6.2.7 6.2.8 6.2.9 6.2.10

2.2.11 2.2.12 2.2.13 2.2.14 2.2.15 4.2.11 4.2.12 4.2.13 4.2.14 4.2.15 5.2.11 5.2.12 5.2.13 5.2.14 5.2.15 6.2.11 6.2.12 6.2.13 6.2.14

2.3 3.3 4.3 6.3 1.3.1 1.3.2 1.3.3 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.5 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 3.3.5 4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.3.4 4.3.5 6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3 6.3.4 6.3.5

2.3.6 2.3.7 2.3.8 2.3.9 2.3.10 3.3.6 3.3.7 3.3.8 3.3.9 3.3.10 4.3.6 4.3.7 4.3.8 4.3.9 4.3.10

2.3.11 3.3.11 3.3.12 3.3.13 4.3.11 4.3.12 4.3.13

2.4 3.4 4.4 6.4 2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 2.4.5 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4 3.4.5 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 4.4.4 4.4.5 6.4.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 6.4.4

2.4.6 2.4.7 2.4.8 2.4.9 2.4.10 3.4.6 3.4.7 3.4.8 3.4.9 3.4.10 4.4.6 4.4.7 4.4.8 4.4.9 4.4.10

2.4.11 2.4.12 2.4.13 2.4.14 2.4.15 3.4.11 3.4.12 3.4.13 3.4.14 3.4.15

2.5 3.5 90 Days2.5.1 2.5.2 2.5.3 2.5.4 2.5.5 3.5.1 3.5.2 3.5.3 3.5.4 3.5.5

2.5.6 2.5.7 2.5.8 2.5.9 2.5.10 3.5.6 3.5.7 3.5.8 3.5.9 Monitor OK 1.1.1 2.5.11 2.5.12 2.5.13 2.5.14 Monitor not OK 1.1.1 Milestone complete 1.1.1

2.6 3.6 Milestone overdue 1.1.1

2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5 3.6.1 3.6.2 3.6.3 3.6.4 3.6.5 Milestone due soon 1.1.1

2.6.6 2.6.7 2.6.8 2.6.9 2.6.10 3.6.6 3.6.7 3.6.8 3.6.9 3.6.10 Milestone not due soon 1.1.1

2.6.11 2.6.12 2.6.13 Item not Active 1.1.1

Workload

6

1.2

Development

Dissemination

Project Execution

BaBarMetadata

Storage

GridPP2 Goal: To develop and deploy a large scale production quality grid in the UK for the use of the Particle Physics community

2 3

Knowledge Transfer

LHCb

GANGA

ATLAS

InteroperabilitySamGrid

Engagement

Production Grid Milestones Production Grid Metrics

1LCG External

4M/S/N

5Non-LHC Apps Management

Navigate downExternal link

PhenoGrid

LHC Apps

1.1

1.3

Security

InfoMon

Design

Service Challenges

Other Link Network LHC Deployment

Project Planning

CMS

Portal

Status Date - 01/Apr/08 + next

UKQCD

Update

Clear


Project Map GridPP3

Date

99ATLAS LHCb CMS 24

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 411.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 1.1.5 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4 1.2.5 1.3.1 1.3.2 1.3.3 1.3.4 1.3.5 1.4.1 1.4.2 1.4.3 1.4.4 1.4.5 271.1.6 1.1.7 1.1.8 1.1.9 1.1.10 1.2.6 1.2.7 1.2.8 1.2.9 1.2.10 1.3.6 1.3.7 1.3.8 1.3.9 1.3.10 1.4.6 1.4.7 1.4.8 1.4.9 1.4.10 111.1.11 1.1.12 1.1.13 1.1.14 1.1.15 1.2.11 1.2.12 1.3.11 1.3.12 1.3.13 1.3.14 1.3.15 1.4.11 21.1.16 1.1.17 1.1.18 1.1.19 1.1.20 101

034

339

2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 3.1.4 3.1.5 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.5 5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.3 5.1.4 5.1.5 6.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 6.1.52.1.6 2.1.7 2.1.8 2.1.9 2.1.10 3.1.6 3.1.7 3.1.8 3.1.9 3.1.10 4.1.6 4.1.7 4.1.8 4.1.9 4.1.10 5.1.6 5.1.7 5.1.8 6.1.6 6.1.7 6.1.8 6.1.92.1.11 2.1.12 2.1.13 3.1.11 3.1.12 3.1.13 3.1.14 3.1.15 4.1.11 4.1.12 4.1.13 4.1.14 4.1.15

3.1.16 3.1.17 3.1.18 3.1.19 3.1.203.1.21 3.1.22

2.2 3.2 4.2 5.2 6.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 2.2.5 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.2.5 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.2.5 5.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3 5.2.4 5.2.5 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 6.2.4 6.2.52.2.6 2.2.7 2.2.8 2.2.9 2.2.10 3.2.6 3.2.7 3.2.8 3.2.9 3.2.10 4.2.6 4.2.7 4.2.8 4.2.9 4.2.10 5.2.6 5.2.7 5.2.8 5.2.9 5.2.10 6.2.6 6.2.7 6.2.8 6.2.9 6.2.102.2.11 2.2.12 2.2.13 2.2.14 2.2.15 3.2.11 3.2.12 3.2.13 3.2.14 3.2.15 4.2.11 4.2.12 4.2.13 4.2.14 4.2.15 5.2.11 5.2.12 6.2.11 6.2.12 6.2.13 6.2.142.2.16 2.2.17 2.2.18 2.2.19 2.2.20 3.2.16 3.2.17 3.2.18 3.2.19 3.2.202.2.21 3.2.21 3.2.22 3.2.23 3.2.24 3.2.25

3.2.26

2.3 3.3 4.3 6.3 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.5 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 3.3.5 4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.3.4 4.3.5 6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3 6.3.4 6.3.52.3.6 2.3.7 3.3.6 3.3.7 3.3.8 3.3.9 3.3.10 4.3.6 4.3.7 4.3.8 4.3.9 4.3.10 6.3.6 6.3.7 6.3.8 6.3.9 6.3.10

3.3.11 3.3.12 3.3.13 3.3.14 3.3.15 4.3.11 4.3.12 4.3.13 4.3.14 4.3.153.3.16 3.3.17 3.3.18 3.3.19 3.3.203.3.21 3.3.22 3.3.23 3.3.24 3.3.253.3.26 3.3.27 3.3.28 3.3.29 3.3.30

2.4 3.4 4.4 6.4 2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 2.4.5 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4 3.4.5 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 4.4.4 4.4.5 6.4.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 6.4.4 6.4.52.4.6 2.4.7 2.4.8 2.4.9 2.4.10 3.4.6 3.4.7 3.4.8 3.4.9 3.4.10 4.4.6 4.4.7 4.4.8 4.4.9 4.4.102.4.11 2.4.12 2.4.13 2.4.14 2.4.15 3.4.11 3.4.12 3.4.13 3.4.14 3.4.15 4.4.11 4.4.12 4.4.13 4.4.14 4.4.152.4.16 3.4.16 3.4.17 3.4.18 3.4.19 3.4.20

3.4.21

2.5 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.5.3 2.5.4 2.5.52.5.6 2.5.7 2.5.8

Milestone achievedMilestone overdueMilestone not due / metric n/aSuspended

EGEE

Metric close to targetMetric not OK

4 5

Hardware procurement

Storage systems

Total

Other experiments

Operations

Security

Front end systems LondonGrid

ScotGridResource delivery

External

Metric OK

6

To provide UK computing for the Large Hadron Collider

Grid services Tier-13

02/09/2009

Not able to be measured

Awaiting input

Middleware support

SouthGrid

NorthGridData and storage

GridPP3 Goal

2

NGI

LCGNetwork

Planning

Execution

Outreach

Tier-2 Management


Experiments red metrics

ATLAS1.1

1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 1.1.51.1.6 1.1.7 1.1.8 1.1.9 1.1.101.1.11 1.1.12 1.1.13 1.1.14 1.1.151.1.16 1.1.17 1.1.18 1.1.19 1.1.20

ATLAS

• 1.1.4 – Tier 1- Job success rate in batch system

•1.1.8 - Tier 1 - Data availability in storage system.

• 1.1.12 - Tier 2 - Data acceptance from Tier 1

• 1.1.15 - Tier 2 - Job success rates in batch system

LHCb

• 1.2.2 - MC production (generation) efficiency

• 1.2.11 - LHCb SAM tests uptime T1

CMS

• 1.3.6 - Time between Data arriving at RAL and being processed

• 1.3.13 - Failed analysis jobs

• 1.3.15 - Provide an appropriate level of resources to CMS

Other experiments

• 1.4.3 - % of jobs reported by any experiment as failing due to Grid (MINOS – 45%)

LHCb1.2

1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4 1.2.51.2.6 1.2.7 1.2.8 1.2.9 1.2.101.2.11 1.2.12

CMS 1.3

1.3.1 1.3.2 1.3.3 1.3.4 1.3.51.3.6 1.3.7 1.3.8 1.3.9 1.3.101.3.11 1.3.12 1.3.13 1.3.14 1.3.15

1.41.4.1 1.4.2 1.4.3 1.4.4 1.4.51.4.6 1.4.7 1.4.8 1.4.9 1.4.101.4.11

Other experiments


Grid services

2.12.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.52.1.6 2.1.7 2.1.8 2.1.9 2.1.102.1.11 2.1.12 2.1.13

OperationsOperations red metrics

• 2.1.1 - Fraction of UK sites in Production (UCL)

• 2.1.3 - Proportion of available jobslots used

•2.1.10 - GridPP deployment web-pages up-to-date

•2.1.13 - Number of sites on VO blacklists

Network red metrics

• 2.3.5 - Maintenance of Gridmon nodes and associated software

Data and storage orange metrics

• 2.4.1 - Correctly defined space tokens as per experiments' requirements

2.3 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.52.3.6 2.3.7

Network

2.4 2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 2.4.52.4.6 2.4.7 2.4.8 2.4.9 2.4.102.4.11 2.4.12 2.4.13 2.4.14 2.4.152.4.16

Data and storage


Tier-1

3.1 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 3.1.4 3.1.53.1.6 3.1.7 3.1.8 3.1.9 3.1.103.1.11 3.1.12 3.1.13 3.1.14 3.1.153.1.16 3.1.17 3.1.18 3.1.19 3.1.203.1.21 3.1.22

Front end systems Front end systems – red metrics

• 3.1.5 - Availability of LHCb, ALICE and CMS VO boxes

Resource delivery – red metrics/ milestones

• 3.2.9 - % met of normalised UB allocation for CPU

• 3.2.10 - Job Efficiency (CPU/Wall)

• 3.2.11 - Farm Occupancy

• 3.2.12 - Percentage of GRIDPP3 Staff in Post

• 3.2.16 - Disaster and Business Continuity Plan Available

•3.2.21 - Recruitment of additional GridPP3 posts complete

Storage systems – red metrics

• 3.3.4 - % met of UB Allocation for Disk

• 3.4.8 - CASTOR SAM tests: LHC VOs

3.2 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.2.53.2.6 3.2.7 3.2.8 3.2.9 3.2.103.2.11 3.2.12 3.2.13 3.2.14 3.2.153.2.16 3.2.17 3.2.18 3.2.19 3.2.203.2.21 3.2.22 3.2.23 3.2.24 3.2.253.2.26

Resource delivery

3.43.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4 3.4.53.4.6 3.4.7 3.4.8 3.4.9 3.4.103.4.11 3.4.12 3.4.13 3.4.14 3.4.153.4.16 3.4.17 3.4.18 3.4.19 3.4.203.4.21

Storage systems


Tier-2s

Red/orange metrics

4.x.1 - % of promised disk available to GridPP (red for ScotGrid 49% and NorthGrid 86%)

4.x.3 - Average SAM (SLL page) availability performance over the last quarter (70-93%, all Tier-2s)

4.x.4 - Average SAM (SLL page) reliability performance over the last quarter (81-93%, all Tier2-s)

4.x.5 – Average SLL untargeted ATLAS test performance (UK test) (86-94%, all Tier-2s)

4.x.6 - Average SLL SE test performance (70%)

4.x.7/8 - CPU utilisation (wall clock time/ CPU time) (London, SouthGrid and NorthGrid, 23-45%)

4.x.9 - % of disk used (21-39%, all Tier-2s)

4.x.10 – number of technical meetings held (ScotGrid, NorthGrid)

4.x.11 – number of management meetings held (London, SouthGrid)

4.14.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.54.1.6 4.1.7 4.1.8 4.1.9 4.1.104.1.11 4.1.12 4.1.13 4.1.14 4.1.15

4.24.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.2.54.2.6 4.2.7 4.2.8 4.2.9 4.2.104.2.11 4.2.12 4.2.13 4.2.14 4.2.15

4.34.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.3.4 4.3.54.3.6 4.3.7 4.3.8 4.3.9 4.3.104.3.11 4.3.12 4.3.13 4.3.14 4.3.15

4.44.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 4.4.4 4.4.54.4.6 4.4.7 4.4.8 4.4.9 4.4.104.4.11 4.4.12 4.4.13 4.4.14 4.4.15

LondonGrid

ScotGrid

SouthGrid

NorthGrid


Management and external

Project execution• 5.2.1 – GridPP staff in post• 5.2.4 - 100% of quarterly reports received

by Project Manager within 2 months of quarter end

Outreach• Number of GridPP publications

5.25.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3 5.2.4 5.2.55.2.6 5.2.7 5.2.8 5.2.9 5.2.105.2.11 5.2.12

Execution

6.16.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 6.1.56.1.6 6.1.7 6.1.8 6.1.9

Outreach


ProjectMap figures

99244127112

1010

34339

Milestone achievedMilestone overdueMilestone not due / metric n/aSuspended

Metric close to targetMetric not OK

Total

Metric OK

Not able to be measured

Awaiting input


Next steps

• Finalise Q2 (April – June) quarterly reports and ProjectMap

• Revise quarterly report template and some metrics• Q3 quarterly reports

– Request at start of October– First version middle of October– Final version end of October

• Oversight Committee?


Conclusion

project management sarah pearce 3 september gridpp21

Documents

gridpp21 swanseatier

gridpp21 swanseamanagement

gridpp21 swanseaconclusion

gridpp red

end systems red metrics

storage orange metrics

percentage of gridpp3

gridpp staff