prognosis of glaucoma in relation to blindness at a university … · 2009. 5. 27. · 200...

6
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(2):199-204 Prognóstico dos glaucomas em relação à cegueira em um serviço universitário Trabalho realizado no Serviço de Glaucoma do Hospi- tal São Geraldo (Hospital das Clínicas) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) - Belo Horizonte - Minas Gerais - Brasil. 1 Professor Titular de Oftalmologia - Faculdade de Medi- cina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) - Brasil. 2 Bolsista de Iniciação Científica (PIBIC - CNPq). Aluna do 12º período de Curso de Graduação em Medicina - Faculdade de Medicina da UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) - Brasil. 3 Pós-graduando (Curso de Doutorado) do Departamen- to de Estatística da UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) - Brasil. 4 Professor Titular de Oftalmologia - Faculdade de Medi- cina da UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) - Brasil. 5 Pós-graduanda (Curso de Doutorado) do Departamen- to de Estatística da UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) - Brasil. Correspondence to: Sebastião Cronemberger. Rua Martim de Carvalho, 410/501 - Belo Horizonte (MG) CEP 30190-090 E-mail: [email protected] Recebido para publicação em 23.07.2008 Última versão recebida em 03.12.2008 Aprovação em 01.03.2009 Nota Editorial: Depois de concluída a análise do arti- go sob sigilo editorial e com a anuência da Dra. Edméa Rita Temporini sobre a divulgação de seu nome como revisora, agradecemos sua participação neste processo. Sebastião Cronemberger 1 Lívia Flávia Sebe Lourenço 2 Lucas Carazza Silva 3 Nassim Calixto 4 Magda Carvalho Pires 5 Prognosis of glaucoma in relation to blindness at a university hospital Keywords: Blindness/diagnosis; Glaucoma/complications; Glaucoma/epidemiology; Prognosis Purpose: To assess the prognosis of different types of glaucoma in relation to unilateral and bilateral blindness at a University Hospital. Methods: Charts of glaucomatous patients which presented complete data of clinical history, visual acuity, visual field, fundus examination and diagnosis were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified as: not blind, legally blind (best corrected visual acuity 20/200 and/or visual field 20º), or totally blind (no light perception) in one or both eyes. Patients with blindness due to congenital glaucoma and other no glaucomatous causes, and incomplete charts were excluded. Results: 3,786 (76.3%) of 4,963 charts fulfilled the criteria. In 3,786 glaucomatous patients, 1,939 (51.2%) were not blind and 1,847 (48.8%) were blind. 1,359 patients (73.6%) were legally blind and 488 (26.4%) totally blind, 1,333 (72.2%) had unilateral blindness and 514 (27.8%), bilateral blindness. 1,564 patients (84.7%) were already blind (74.9% with legal blindness and 25.1% with total blindness) when they arrived at the Service and 283 (15.3%) became blind after their inclusion in the Service. Neovascular glaucoma presented the highest proportion (95.6%) of blindness. Postsurgical glaucoma was second causing blindness in 72.7% and thirdly, primary angle-closure glaucoma with 67.4%. Primary open- angle glaucoma presented the lowest proportion (40.5%) of blindness. Conclusions: Neovascular glaucoma had the worst prognosis with the highest proportion of blindness. Primary angle-closure glaucoma caused blindness roughly 1.7 times more than primary open-angle glaucoma. Primary open-angle glaucoma presented the best prognosis. The proportion of patients that became blind after their inclusion in the Service was relatively low in relation to the proportion of patients who were blind when they arrived at the Service. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Glaucoma is one of the greatest public health challenges that has be- come increasingly prevalent due to the advance of longevity. This disease affects approximately 67 million people in the world (1) . The Brazilian Coun- cil of Ophthalmology estimates the existence of close to 900 thousand glauco- matous people within a population of 169 million people. Among glauco- matous people, 720 thousand are asymptomatic and half are unaware of their disease (2-4) . According to the World Heath Organization (WHO), glaucoma is the second eye disease that causes blindness, responsible for 15% of blindness

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(2):199-204

    Prognóstico dos glaucomas em relação à cegueira em um serviço universitário

    Trabalho realizado no Serviço de Glaucoma do Hospi-tal São Geraldo (Hospital das Clínicas) - UniversidadeFederal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) - Belo Horizonte -Minas Gerais - Brasil.

    1 Professor Titular de Oftalmologia - Faculdade de Medi-cina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG- Belo Horizonte (MG) - Brasil.

    2 Bolsista de Iniciação Científica (PIBIC - CNPq). Alunado 12º período de Curso de Graduação em Medicina -Faculdade de Medicina da UFMG - Belo Horizonte(MG) - Brasil.

    3 Pós-graduando (Curso de Doutorado) do Departamen-to de Estatística da UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) -Brasil.

    4Professor Titular de Oftalmologia - Faculdade de Medi-cina da UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) - Brasil.

    5 Pós-graduanda (Curso de Doutorado) do Departamen-to de Estatística da UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) -Brasil.

    Correspondence to: Sebastião Cronemberger. RuaMartim de Carvalho, 410/501 - Belo Horizonte (MG)CEP 30190-090E-mail: [email protected]

    Recebido para publicação em 23.07.2008Última versão recebida em 03.12.2008Aprovação em 01.03.2009

    Nota Editorial: Depois de concluída a análise do arti-go sob sigilo editorial e com a anuência da Dra. EdméaRita Temporini sobre a divulgação de seu nome comorevisora, agradecemos sua participação neste processo.

    Sebastião Cronemberger1 Lívia Flávia Sebe Lourenço2Lucas Carazza Silva3Nassim Calixto4 Magda Carvalho Pires5

    Prognosis of glaucoma in relation to blindnessat a university hospital

    Keywords: Blindness/diagnosis; Glaucoma/complications; Glaucoma/epidemiology; Prognosis

    Purpose: To assess the prognosis of different types of glaucoma inrelation to unilateral and bilateral blindness at a University Hospital.Methods: Charts of glaucomatous patients which presented completedata of clinical history, visual acuity, visual field, fundus examinationand diagnosis were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classifiedas: not blind, legally blind (best corrected visual acuity ≤20/200 and/orvisual field ≤20º), or totally blind (no light perception) in one or botheyes. Patients with blindness due to congenital glaucoma and other noglaucomatous causes, and incomplete charts were excluded. Results:3,786 (76.3%) of 4,963 charts fulfilled the criteria. In 3,786 glaucomatouspatients, 1,939 (51.2%) were not blind and 1,847 (48.8%) were blind.1,359 patients (73.6%) were legally blind and 488 (26.4%) totally blind,1,333 (72.2%) had unilateral blindness and 514 (27.8%), bilateralblindness. 1,564 patients (84.7%) were already blind (74.9% with legalblindness and 25.1% with total blindness) when they arrived at theService and 283 (15.3%) became blind after their inclusion in the Service.Neovascular glaucoma presented the highest proportion (95.6%) ofblindness. Postsurgical glaucoma was second causing blindness in 72.7%and thirdly, primary angle-closure glaucoma with 67.4%. Primary open-angle glaucoma presented the lowest proportion (40.5%) of blindness.Conclusions: Neovascular glaucoma had the worst prognosis with thehighest proportion of blindness. Primary angle-closure glaucoma causedblindness roughly 1.7 times more than primary open-angle glaucoma.Primary open-angle glaucoma presented the best prognosis. The proportionof patients that became blind after their inclusion in the Service wasrelatively low in relation to the proportion of patients who were blindwhen they arrived at the Service.

    ABSTRACT

    INTRODUCTION

    Glaucoma is one of the greatest public health challenges that has be-come increasingly prevalent due to the advance of longevity. This diseaseaffects approximately 67 million people in the world(1). The Brazilian Coun-cil of Ophthalmology estimates the existence of close to 900 thousand glauco-matous people within a population of 169 million people. Among glauco-matous people, 720 thousand are asymptomatic and half are unaware of theirdisease(2-4).

    According to the World Heath Organization (WHO), glaucoma is thesecond eye disease that causes blindness, responsible for 15% of blindness

    72(2)17.pmd 14/4/2009, 11:41199

  • 200 Prognosis of glaucoma in relation to blindness at a university hospital

    Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(2):199-204

    worldwide(1,5-6). Blindness caused by glaucoma occurs in de-veloping countries like Brazil due to the difficulties of ac-cess to health care institutions which lead to late diagnosisand treatment. Another cause is inadequate treatment due tovarious motives, principally the noncompliance of patientsto their treatment owing to the impossibility of acquiring theantiglaucomatous drops. The seriousness of glaucoma is jus-tified by the fact that it causes structural damage to the opticdisc and irreversible loss of function that can trigger legal (bestcorrected visual acuity ≤20/200 and/or visual field ≤20º), ortotal blindness (no light perception). Several types of glau-coma exist that are substantially different in relation to theirevolution and prognosis for causing blindness. In the lite-rature, very few papers have made a comparative study ofblindness caused by different types of glaucoma(7-9).

    This paper evaluates the prognosis of glaucoma in rela-tion to the frequency of unilateral and bilateral blindnesscaused by different forms of glaucoma.

    METHODS

    A retrospective analysis was done at the Glaucoma Ser-vice of the São Geraldo Hospital of glaucomatous patients’charts from 1959 to 2006. Only patients whose charts presen-ted complete data of their clinical history, visual acuity (VA),visual field (VF), fundus examination and diagnosis wereincluded. The patients were classified as: not blind, legallyblind (VA ≤20/200 under the best correction and/or VF ≤20°according to WHO1), or totally blind (no light perception) inone or both eyes. Patients with blindness due to congenitalglaucoma and other not glaucomatous causes, and incom-plete charts were excluded. For each patient, we recorded thetype of glaucoma that caused the blindness in one or botheyes considering that some types of glaucoma can occur inonly one eye. We assessed the type of glaucoma that causedblindness and the type of blindness (legal or total), the affec-ted eye along with the age.

    The statistical analysis was done by the Z test for pro-portions, Pearson chi-square test, Student’s t test and Mann-Whitney test (SPSS 13.0).

    This study was approved by the Research Ethics Commit-tee of the Federal University of Minas Gerais.

    RESULTS

    We analyzed 4,963 glaucomatous patients’ charts, butonly 3,786 (76.3%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In 3,786glaucomatous patients, 1,939 (51.2%) were not blind and1,847 (48.8%) were blind due to different types of glaucoma.Table 1 demonstrates that blindness was associated with thetype of glaucoma. We observed that the proportion of legal ortotal blindness was significantly higher (P-value

  • 201Prognosis of glaucoma in relation to blindness at a university hospital

    Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(2):199-204

    Table 1. Number of blind and not blind glaucomatous patients and type of blindness in primary and secondary glaucoma in the GlaucomaService of the São Geraldo Hospital from 1959 to 2006

    Type of Glaucomatous patients* Type of blindness**glaucoma Without blindness With blindness Legal Total

    n % n % n % n %Primary 1740 55.9 1375 44.1 1052 76.5 323 23.5Secondary 0199 29.7 0472 70.3 0307 65.0 165 35.0n= number of patients; *Z test for proportions= -13.27, P-value

  • 202 Prognosis of glaucoma in relation to blindness at a university hospital

    Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(2):199-204

    teral blindness, respectively 35.0%, 25.5%, and 25.3%. Onthe other hand, traumatic glaucoma, postsurgical glaucomaand PACG presented the highest proportion of unilateralblindness, respectively 94.7%, 84.4%, and 83.3%. However,no correlation was found between the type of glaucoma andthe affected eye in cases of monocular blindness (Pearsonchi-square test (χ2)= 3.7; P-value= 0.716).

    The age was presented as a possible risk factor for blindnessin patients with POAG, PACG, and traumatic glaucoma. In thesegroups, the age of the patients who developed blindness wassignificantly higher (Student’s t test= 9.62; P-value 0.05) than the age ofthose patients without blindness.

    DISCUSSION

    This study was done at the São Geraldo Hospital, FederalUniversity of Minas Gerais, where patients with many differentocular diseases receive treatment. In general; the Hospital’spatients have advanced or severe ocular diseases. As a tertiarypublic hospital, a great number of its patients have low averagesocial and economic conditions. In consequence, these patientshave little access to information on how to deal with theirhealth. In agreement with other authors(2-4), many patients knownothing about ocular diseases that can cause blindness such asglaucoma. Glaucoma is an asymptomatic eye disease and thisimportant factor is responsible for patients to seek treatmentonly when the disease is in an advanced stage. These factsexplain the findings of this paper: a high proportion (48.8%) ofblindness caused by glaucoma as well as a very high proportion(84.7%) of patients who were already blind when they arrived atthe Service. These findings are similar to those found by aBrazilian study(10), in which the authors reported that 40 (83.3%)of 48 eyes were already legally blind when they were examinedfor the first time. Another Brazilian study(11) reported a smallerproportion of blind patients (51.8% with unilateral blindnessand 33.3% with bilateral blindness) when they arrived at theirService. The criterion for blindness was a visual acuity < 20/200.In relation to the type of glaucoma, that paper(11) found that90.9% of patients with NVG, 75.0% of patients with uveiticglaucoma and 60.0% of patients with glaucoma associated withpseudoexfoliation were already blind when they arrived at theService. In the present paper, NVG (84.7%), postsurgical glau-coma (66.9%), and PACG (56.6%) were the types of glaucomathat presented the highest proportion of patients who werealready blind when they arrived at the Glaucoma Service.

    In this study, we consider the legal or total blindness ofone or both eyes of each patient because some types of glau-coma can occur in only one eye or asymmetrically in botheyes of one patient. The data of this paper demonstrate thatPOAG was obviously more prevalent (71.3%) than othertypes of glaucoma, which is in agreement with other publica-tions(2,4,6,9-14). However, less than a half of POAG patients(40.5%) presented blindness. This type of glaucoma alsopresented the lowest proportion of total blindness (19.2%)(Table 2). The fact that POAG is always bilateral could ex-plain why it is responsible for the highest proportion (35.0%)of binocular blindness. In relation to age, blindness due toPOAG presented the oldest mean age (63.7 years) among allglaucomatous patients. Other important findings related toPOAG are: the lowest proportion (33.4%) of patients whowere already blind when they arrived at the Service (Table 3),and one of the lowest proportions (10.7%) of patients whobecame blind with the second longest average time of treat-ment (8.4 years) (Table 4). These findings are in accordancewith the highest frequency of POAG because of aging and theslow and insidious evolution of this disease. Based on all ofthe above findings, we can conclude that POAG has the bestprognosis in relation to blindness. PACG was another primaryglaucoma studied which also presented important findings.In relation to age, it had the second highest average (62.7 years).This average is a little higher than that reported in patientsduring the crisis of acute angle-closure (58.9 years)(15). Howe-ver, and most important is the fact that PACG caused 1.7times more blindness than POAG according to some au-thors(15). In this paper, we find that PACG caused legal or totalblindness in 67.4% of the patients and this type of glaucomahas the second highest proportion of total blindness (40.2%).PACG also presented a higher proportion (56.6%) than POAGof patients who were already blind when they arrived at theService. A disproportion is observed in the fact that PACG isthe leading cause of bilateral blindness in China(5), takinginto consideration that this type of glaucoma can be preven-ted if adequate clinical or surgical treatment is provided.

    In relation to unilateral and bilateral blindness, POAG,other secondary glaucoma, and NVG presented the highestproportion of bilateral blindness, respectively 35.0%, 25.5%,and 25.3%. Unilateral blindness was more common in trau-matic glaucoma, postsurgical glaucoma and PACG, res-pectively 94.7%, 84.4%, and 83.3%. These findings are indisagreement with those of one paper in which PACG wasresponsible for 91% of bilateral glaucoma blindness inChina(5).

    In this paper, charts of primary or secondary congenitalglaucoma were excluded due to the lack of complete dataabout visual acuity and visual field in childhood.

    A very important finding was the proportion of legal ortotal blindness significantly higher (P-value

  • 203Prognosis of glaucoma in relation to blindness at a university hospital

    Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(2):199-204

    proportion (35.0%) of total blindness than primary glaucoma(23.5%) (P-value

  • 204 Prognosis of glaucoma in relation to blindness at a university hospital

    Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(2):199-204

    13. Hattenhauer MG, Johnson DH, Ing HH, Herman DC, Hodge DO, Yawn BP, etal. The probability of blindness from open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology.1998;105(11):2099-104. Comment in: Ophthalmology. 1999;106(11):2039-41.

    14. Calixto N. Epidemiologia do glaucoma. Belo Horizonte; 1997. (comunicaçãopessoal).

    15. Lai JS, Liu DT, Tham CC, Li RT, Lam DS. Epidemiology of acute primaryangle-closure glaucoma in the Hong Kong Chinese population: prospectivestudy. Hong Kong Med J. 2001;7(2):118-23.

    16. Costa VP, Almeida GV, Kara-José N. Prevenção da cegueira por glaucoma.Arq Bras Oftalmol. 1998;61(3):356-60.

    17. Hattenhauer MG, Johnson DH, Herman DC, Hodge DO, Gray DT. Halfempty or half full?. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(6):861-2. Comment in: ArchOphthalmol. 1999;117(9):1211-5; Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(9):1236-7.

    18. World Health Organization. Strategies for the prevention of blindness innational programmers; a primary healthy care approach. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO;1997.

    72(2)17.pmd 14/4/2009, 11:41204

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 150 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /PDFX1a:2001 ] /PDFX1aCheck true /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly true /PDFXNoTrimBoxError false /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (Euroscale Coated v2) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier (FOGRA1) /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org) /PDFXTrapped /False

    /SyntheticBoldness 1.000000 /Description >>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice