professor gary m. carter dr. anthony lenihan and professor ... · dr. anthony lenihan and professor...
TRANSCRIPT
1
High Speed Optical NetworksHigh Speed Optical Networks----ExperimentsExperiments
Professor Gary M. Carter Dr. Anthony Lenihan
and Professor Curtis Menyuk
University of Maryland Baltimore County
UMIACS/LTS Review 6/18/04
2
Collaborators
Robert RunserTelcordia, LTS
L. MercerNaval Research Laboratory
T. Gibbons, P. SchulzMIT Lincoln Laboratory
3
Goals—Past year(s)
• Carry out experiments on installed optical communication systems
• To identify and investigate issues of interest in helping establish high speed operation of optical networks
4
This year’s effort
• We have shown in laboratory experiments that dispersion distribution is important for communications performance
• We moved these experiments from the lab to ATDNET/BossNet
• Implications for network management • Investigated novel formats that can increase
performance and relax constraints
5
Nonlinear Interaction
• Dispersion causes adjacent pulses to spread in time and overlap for part of the transmission distance
• The nonlinear interaction due to the optical fiber between adjacent pulses leads to timing jitter
• The dispersion distribution can alter the amount of timing jitter
• Large amounts of timing jitter causes errors
6
Nonlinear Interaction—Frequency Shift
TL uuu +=
tu
zf TL
dd
dd
2
γ−=
FWHM = 100 ps
0
0.01
0.02
600 800 1000
Time (ps)
Pow
er (m
W)
Lu
LuTuIntensity variation of shifts frequency of
Tu
7
Residual compensation all at the end
8
Nearly closed eye and large error rate due to timing jitter
10 Gb/s
9
Split compensation between beginning and end
10
Open eye end low bit-error rate
10 Gb/s
11
Laboratory Results
• Intra-channel cross-phase modulation → timing jitter
• Dependent on dispersion map configuration– Most work to date on undersea transmission systems– Mitigated by symmetric pre- and post-compensation
• Laboratory investigation of terrestrial system– Xu, et al., IEEE Phot. Tech. Lett. 16, 314 (2004)
12
Experiments on ATDNET/BossNet
• Measure timing jitter at 10 Gb/s on an installed terrestrial fiber path
• Obtain excellent qualitative agreement between measured values and numerical simulations
• Arrangement of dispersion compensation important for obtaining best transmission
13
Installed fiber path
Segment 1 (ATDNet):
Segment 3 (BOSSNet):
Washington, D.C.
• TrueWave RS (+4.5 ps/nm-km), 41 km• Uncompensated
• TrueWave Classic (+2.8 ps/nm-km)– To Wilmington: 186 km– To New York City: 389 km
• Compensated at 1550 nm• Uneven EDFA spacing
Segment 2• AllWave (+17 ps/nm-km), 16 km• Uncompensated
One way distances:
=Tx/Rx
Wilmington, DE
New York, NY
14
Experimental setup
InstallednetworkCW Laser
@1558.98nm EAM EOM
DC
NYC
BERT
Oscilloscope
Clock/DataRecovery
OBF
10 GHz Clock
10 Gb/sPRBS
Pre-Compensation
Post-Compensation
OSA
Rx:
Tx:
• Tx/Rx co-located in D.C.
EDFA
15
Dispersion mapsLoopback at Wilmington, DE Loopback at New York, NY
• Not including pre- and post-compensation• Total accumulated dispersion for round trip at 1558.98 nm
= EDFA
Accu
mul
ated
Dis
pers
ion
(ps/
nm)
Distance (km) Distance (km)
0
800
1600
0 6000
900
1800
0 1000
16
Numerical model
• Full nonlinear Schrödinger equation• 200 Monte Carlo simulations• Utilizing best estimate of system parameters:
– Dispersion map– Amplifier noise figures– Power map
Timing jitter results compared with numerical simulation:
17
Eye diagramsW
ilmin
gton
, DE
New
Yor
k, N
Y
50 % Pre-compensation 90 % Pre-compensation
18
Wilmington loopback results
• Total transmission distance ~520 km• Symmetric dispersion compensation minimizes timing jitter• Excellent qualitative agreement with theory
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
0 25 50 75 100
Pre-Compensation (%)
Tim
ing
Jitte
r (ps
)
ExperimentTheory
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
0 25 50 75 100
Pre-Compensation (%)Q
Fact
or
Experiment
19
New York loopback results
• Total transmission distance ~930 km• Jitter increased, but similar trend
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
0 25 50 75 100
Pre-Compensation (%)
Tim
ing
Jitte
r (ps
)
ExperimentTheory
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
0 25 50 75 100
Pre-Compensation (%)Q
Fact
or
Experiment
20
Summary
• Timing jitter measured on installed terrestrial link
• Qualitative agreement with simulations
• Ability to control dispersion compensation layout will be important in typical terrestrial systems may influence network management when paths change
21
Novel Formats
• Explore Novel formats • DPSK• QPSK• QPSK and PolMux• Others
22
DPSK
• Phase modulated signal• 3 dB advantage over ASK• Constant amplitude pulses• Less “patterning”• Security implications
23
DPSK Transmitted Intensity Pattern
10 Gb/s
24
Receiver
25
Demodulated Eye Pattern—10Gb/s
26
DPSK Loop Back from LPS to ISIError Rate < 1 10−13
27
DPSK
• 3 dB performance advantage over ASK• Less Pattern Dependence in Transmission—
maybe smaller timing jitter• More difficult to detect—need specialized
receiver• Provides different information to network
management
28
New Directions for Upcoming Year
• We are working with LTS to adapt measurements and theory to interactions with system and optical control plane
• LTS Personnel: Mark Ciccarello , Dave Hardesty, and Walter Kaechele