professor cris print dr justin o'sullivan south/sat_room6_1100_chris...dr justin...
TRANSCRIPT
Professor Cris PrintBiomedical Scientist
Director
Genomics Into Medicine Initiative
Auckland
11:00 - 11:55 WS #84: An Open Discussion on Genomics in Medicine: When, Where, and How
12:05 - 13:00 WS #95: An Open Discussion on Genomics in Medicine: When, Where, and How
(Repeated)
Dr Justin O'SullivanAssociate Director
Research
Laboratory Head
University of Auckland · Liggins Institute,
Auckland
An Open Discussion on
Genomics in Medicine:
When, Where, and How
Justin O’Sullivan and Cris Print
August 2018
Plan
• …
How are GPs most likely
to be involved?
Points for discussion
In what areas are GPs most likely
to use genomics in the near future?
• Cancer – germline (~5% cancer attributable to single
gene highly penetrant variants) and somatic (directing
treatment) (discussed yesterday by Cris Print)
• Rare disease including disorders of biochemical
pathways - 80% of diseases affecting 5% of individuals
are genetic in origin – can avoid protracted diagnostic
odysseys, phenotype-driven (discussed yesterday by Patrick Yap)
• Risk stratification for complex diseases using genomic
data and lifestyle factors (discussed yesterday by Tony Merriman)
• In prenatal diagnosis (discussed yesterday by Dean Morbeck)
• Direct to consumer testing interpretation and occasional
use (discussed yesterday by Stephen Robertson)
How much ‘genomics’ will GPs need to know?
• The RCGP identifies three roles for genetics in primary
care:
o identifying patients with, or at risk of, a genetic condition
o clinical management of genetic conditions
o communicating genetic information
• Current knowledge and skills of GPs are transferable to
genomics – “GPs will not require substantial additional
expertise or an in-depth knowledge of genomic variants”.
• However GPs may require an understanding of
terminology and principles underpinning genomics
Royal College of General Practitioners. RCGP Curriculum 3 02 Genetics in primary care
New science of genomics that is
rapidly entering the clinic
• The relevance of the 3-dimensional genome structure - a
“SNP” may promote disease by affecting a physically
distant gene (discussed yesterday by Justin O’Sullivan)
• Somatic stem cell mutations accumulate throughout life,
altering immune responses, and promoting disease
• New technologies such as point of care DNA sequencing
machines and sequencing of cancer mutations in the
blood of cancer patients
Schierding et al. Front Genet. 2014;5:39
We can determine population based risk
100 trillion cells, 20 % have DNA, 2 m long
= 266 Astronomical units.
133 X’s
Territories exist in
human Go fibroblast cells
DNA is structured
within cells.
Bolzer et al. 2005 PLoS Biology 3(5):e157
Territories exist in exponentially yeast cells.
Gehlen et al. 2012 Nucleus 3(4):1-15
Our heritable information is encoded in
more than the DNA sequence
Yassour et al. 2016; DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad0917
There are common features of the human microbiome
Dynamic
Sensitive: to birth mode,
predominant nutrition
antibiotic use
Transition to solids
High diversity
Resilience to
change
Billy Apple®
Ethics: The University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee
Ref: 017841 and 2008/157
Excretory Wipings (1971, Apple, 161 West 23rd St, New York), censored in From
Barrie Bates to Billy Apple 1960-1974 (1974, Serpentine Gallery, London)
What happens over one individual’s lifetime?n=Billy Apple®
Billy was healthy in 1970
Billy’s 2016 flora is not what it used to be in 1970
Faith, J. et al. (2013) Science,
341(6141)
~50% of the microbial population structure is predicted to be stable over 50 years.
The active flora is different in children born very preterm
Serum cholesterol,
high hepatic TAG, less
glycogen & glucose
metabolism
increased in protein rich diets
And what these bacteria are actually doing is very different
Arginine biosynthesis
Histidine biosynthesis
New science that is transforming our
understanding of some diseases:
somatic stem cell mutations
• Clonal haematopoiesis is an expanded blood-cell
“clone” carrying a somatic mutation in patients with no
other hematologic abnormality
• Accumulates with age (found in >10% of people >70
years)
• Case–control analyses showed that CH individuals
have 1.9 x elevated risk of coronary artery disease
Jaiswal et al., N Engl J Med vol 377 pp 111-121
Case–control analyses showed that
CH individuals have significantly elevated
risk of coronary artery atherosclerosis
• Exome sequencing of endometriosis identified somatic mutations
in ~80% of lesions
• These mutations are in known cancer driver genes such as
ARID1A, PIK3CA, KRAS, or PPP2R1A
• This does not mean that endometriosis is a neoplastic disease,
however identical mutations are found in endometriosis and
ovarian cancer of the same woman
New diagnostic
techniques
Chromosomal Microarray
(a digital Karyotype)
• Detects Copy number variants “CNVs deletions or
duplications of DNA
• 15-20% diagnostic yield compared with 5% with conventional
karyotype
• Now first line investigation for intellectual disability and congenital
anomalies
• Should be offered to persons with significant intellectual disability
without a diagnosis where a diagnostic re-evaluation would improve
clinical care, and who have previously only had a karyotype
Duplication
Deletion
Next generation Sequencing
• Particularly applicable to clinically and genetically heterogeneous
disorders e.g. >200 genes for neuromuscular disorders
• Whole genome sequencing (WGS) – all 3 billion base pairs of the
human genome, low relative yield, expensive (~$20,000), a clinical
provider in Sydney
• Whole exome sequencing (WES) – ~3% of the human genome,
~30% diagnostic yield, price falling (<$3,000) and is cost effective
• Targeted panels (or filtered exome sequencing) cost effective
• Point of care sequencing, e.g. “Minion”, in trials for microbiology
https://nanoporetech.com
NZ ‘exome’ Sequencing
McKeown et. al., A pilot study of exome sequencing in a diverse New Zealand cohort with undiagnosed disorders and cancer.
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2018 DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2018.1464033
Direct to Consumer
Genetics
The direct to consumer testing
landscape
(discussed yesterday by Prof Stephen Robertson)
• Test companies regulated as consumer products
• Patients controls and manage their data
• Patient often chooses a third party to interpret the data,
which is often done online
• Test quality and interpretation quality usually unregulated
• Even within a company’s test there are mixed (Analytic
validity, Clinical validity, Clinical utility and Personal utility)
for different genes and SNPs
CME resources
https://www.primarycaregenetics.org/?page_id=109&lang=en
https://www.eviq.org.au