productive ecosystem
DESCRIPTION
Well Developed Soil. Productive Ecosystem. Radrick Forest: A Mixed Oak Ecosystem. Outline. Re-introduction to Radrick Forest Soil characteristics: Physical Chemical Biological Synthesis: How do the factors above combine to influence soil formation and ecosystem development?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Productive Ecosystem
Well Developed Soil
Radrick Forest: A Mixed Oak Ecosystem
Outline
I. Re-introduction to Radrick ForestSoil characteristics:I. PhysicalII. ChemicalIII. BiologicalIV. Synthesis: How do the factors above
combine to influence soil formation and ecosystem development?
Glacial History of Michigan
0
0.2
0.4
0.60.8
1
1.2
1.4
AWC Bulk Density
(cm3 H2O/cm3 soil) (g/cm3)
Mixed OakOak-HickoryN. HardwoodsBlack Oak/White Oak
Soil typeMixed Oak Loam
Oak-Hickory Sandy LoamN. Hardwoods Loamy Sand
Black Oak/White Oak Sand
Soil Formation
Why does Radrick have well developed soil?
•Climate
•Glacial History
•Parent Material
Chemical properties of the mixed oak ecosystem
pH (DI water) pH (CaCl2) CEC (cmolc/kg) % Base Saturation
Mixed Oak 6.14 5.71 8.57 0.99
Oak Hickory 4.98 4.19 10.78 0.99
Northern Hardwoods 4.50 3.11 4.03 0.93
Black Oak/White Oak
3.50 2.63 1.90 0.13
Comparison graph for pH and CEC
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
pH (H20) pH (CaCl2) CEC(cmolc/kg)
Mixed Oak
Oak-Hickory
NorthernHardwoodBlack Oak/WhiteOak
Why do we see these differences?
• Parent material may explain the north/south data
• But, OH and MO share the same parent material, so we look to weathering and %organic matter
• These play into soil texture; MO is the most clayey of the sites.
• The MO profile is highly developed and has a strong buffering capacity.
Radrick Forest Microbial Carbon Utilization Compared to Other Ecosystems
• Mixed Oak has relatively high levels of microbial biomass compared to other ecosystems;•But total microbial activity is not much different;
Microbial Activity in Four Michigan Forest Ecosystems
MO
MO
OH
OH
NH
NH
NO
NO
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
160.00
180.00
MO 154.92 20.76
OH 91.50 23.21
NH 126.57 22.94
NO 40.93 12.43
Avg Microbial biomass(μgC/g)
Avg Microbial respiration(μg/g/d)
Relative Proportions of the number of
microorganisms
Fungi?%
Bacteria?%
Actinomycetes?%
Discussion of Microbial Activity in Radrick Forest:What factors explain why MO has high microbial biomass, but low activity?•Composition of microbial community?
-A higher proportion of actinomycetes would tend to result in lower respiration, but unlikely to account for the higher biomass. -A high proportion of bacteria would account for a higher biomass, but not for the low activity.-A higher presence of fungi would account for the higher biomass, and possibly into lower respiration, if C is incorporated in building biomass rather than respired.
Other Potential Factors:•Presence of organic matter?
–Radrick forest has a moderate level of soil organic matter.• Soil physical characteristics?
–The more clayey texture of the MO system would tend to reduce gaseous diffusion, causing locally increased CO2 levels, thus slowing respiration rates even with a high microbial biomass.
• Soil chemical characteristics?– The overall pH is moderate, and not particularly conducive to fungi. But poor diffusion could create microzones with high CO2 concentrations, and low pH.
It may explain
It may explain
It may explain
It may explain
Radrick Forest Mineralization and Nitrification Compared to Other Ecosystems
• Mixed Oak has a high rate of N Mineralization compared to other ecosystems;•Efficiency of MO
Microbial Activity in Four Michigan Forest Ecosystems
MO
MO
MO
OHOH
OH
NHNH
NH
NONO
NO
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
MO 5.51 1.71 3.91
OH 1.35 0.06 17.13
NH 3.74 1.88 6.19
NO 1.02 0.02 12.18
Avg Net NMineralization
(μg N/g/d)
Avg Net Nitrification (μg N/g/d)
Ratio of C respired to N mineralized
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Biom
ass
(Mg/
ha)
Mi neral Soi l 35. 8 91. 9 29. 5 12. 6Forest Fl oor 11. 5 6. 5 7. 2 7. 2Aboveground 269. 2 226. 4 245. 2 182. 8
MO OH NH NO
Radrick forest has: highest above ground biomass highest litter production intermediate soil organic matter
*High decomposition rate Near neutral PH,
Sufficient soil moisture Good aeration and Relatively warm climate High litter quality
Why does Radrick forest not have the highest soil organic matter?
* Relatively lower allocation to root and n nutrient-rich ecosystem
Low High
Nitrogen Availability
Standing RootBiomass
Percent of TotalNPP Allocated toRootRoot Mortality
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Nitr
ogen
Poo
l (k
g/ha
)
Mi neral Soi l 3501. 9 1718. 4 2382. 8 1221. 1Forest Fl oor 154. 7 42. 2 88. 2 54. 1Aboveground 582. 2 486. 3 572. 6 404. 3
MO OH NH NO
Why is the soil OM in Radrick forest such a big pool of N?
• 1. Clayey soil with high CEC large amount of inorganic N is bound
• 2. Contain some species with nutrient-rich tissue higher litter quality. (N concentration in forest floor = 1.35%)
(even higher than NH??)• 3. High microbial biomass can
be part of the pool
SpeciesRelative
Dominance (%)
Leave N concentrat
ion(%)
Branch N concentrat
ion(%)
Blake Oak (Quercus velutina)
8.5 1.19 0.39
Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
13.1 2.29 0.59
Sassafras (Sassafras albidum)
15.0
Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis)
25.2 1.31 0.45
Red Oak (Quercus rubra)
33.4 1.23 0.42
Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovata)
1.2 1.31 0.45
Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)
3.6 2.11 0.48
Effect of high nitrification:Negatively charged nitrate ions are not adsorbed by the negatively charged colloids, so it leaches out of the ecosystem easily.
Soil NO3- Without Incubation (ug N / cm3 soil)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
MO OH NH NO
ug N/cm3
Soil NH3+ Without Incubation (ug N / cm3 soil)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
MO OH NH NO
ug N/cm3
Radrick Forest has highest aboveground biomass, faster nutrient uptake
Soil: *Fine texture *Calcareous parent material *High water availability *High PH *High CEC
Climate:Relatively warm and humid
High Above ground biomass
High quality of both above- and below- ground litter
Large soil microbial community
High rate of decomposition and mineralization
Fast uptake
Low leaching
Low fire frequency
Nutrient tightly bound within the ecosystem
Thanks!!