product differentiation copyright © 2012 pearson education, inc. publishing as prentice hall. 5-1...
TRANSCRIPT
Product Product DifferentiationDifferentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 5-5-11
Chapter 5Chapter 5
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 2
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-22
Mission Objectives
ExternalAnalysis
InternalAnalysis
StrategicChoice
StrategyImplementation
CompetitiveAdvantage
The Strategic Management Process
Business LevelStrategy
Corporate LevelStrategy
How to Position aBusiness
in the Market?
Which Businessesto Enter?
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 3
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-33
Business Level Strategies
Two Generic Business Level Strategies
Cost Leadership:
• generate economic value by having lower coststhan competitors
Product Differentiation:
• generate economic value by offering a productthat customers prefer over competitors’ product
Example: Wal-Mart
Example: Harley-Davidson
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 4
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-44
Product Differentiation
• Product differentiation is a business level strategy in which firms attempt to create and exploit differences between their products and those offered by competitors. These differences may lead to competitive advantage if customers perceive the difference and have a preference for the difference.
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 5
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-55
Bases of Differentiation
A base of differentiation must fill somecustomer need:
• image
• status
• comfort
• taste
• beauty
• style
• furthering a cause
• reliability in use
• safety
• cleanliness
• service
• quality
• accuracy
• hunger
A differentiated product fills one or more needsbetter than the products of competitors
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 6
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-66
Almost anything can be a base of differentiation
• tangible thing (product features, location, etc.)
• intangible concept (reputation, a cause, an ideal, etc.)
• limited only by managerial creativity
Bases of Differentiation
• the wide range of customer needs can be filledby a wide range of bases of differentiation
Example: Fred Smith and FedEx
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 7
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-77
Bases of Differentiation
Three Categories
1) Product Attributes
2) Firm—Customer Relationships
3) Firm Linkages
• exploiting the actual product
• exploiting relationships with customers
• exploiting relationships within the firmand/or relationships with other firms
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 8
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-88
Bases of Differentiation
• Product Attributes• preferences are created by actual differences in the
tangible product or service offered by the focal firm vis-à-vis competitors’ offerings
• product features (Arm & Hammer’s baking soda toothpaste)• product complexity (new digital cameras compared to single use film
cameras)• timing of product introduction (release of movies during the Holiday
and Summer seasons)• location (Chevron’s company-owned, combined c-stores & gas
stations are situated in prime traffic locations)
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 9
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-99
Bases of Differentiation
• Firm-Customer Relationships• preferences are created as the focal firm combines the
competencies of different functions within or across organizations to produce tangible and/or intangible differences between the focal firm’s offerings and those of competitors
• linkages among functions within the focal firm (Ford Motor Company’s combination of auto manufacturing and financing)
• linkages with other firms (Mattel toys in McDonald’s Happy Meals)• product mix (Cisco’s wide range of Internet technology products)• distribution channels (Coke & Pepsi vending machines)• service and support (Lexus service)
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 10
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-1010
Bases of Differentiation
• Firm Linkages• preferences are created as the focal firm develops and
exploits relationships with customers based on what the focal firm’s target customers want
• product customization (Dell Computers-customers get exactly the features desired)
• consumer marketing (Mountain Dew-changed the image of the product through marketing-product stayed the same)
• product reputation (Harley-Davidson Motorcycles-reputation is so strong that some people tattoo the logo on their bodies)
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 11
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-1111
Competitive Advantage
A product differentiation strategy must meet theVRIO criteria…
Is it Valuable?
Is it Rare?
Is it costly to Imitate?
Is the firm Organized to exploit it?
…if it is to create competitive advantage.
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 12
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-1212
The Value of Product Different
• Neutralizing Threats • how product differentiation can neutralize the
threats of the forces mentioned in the Five Forces Model along with an example of each one. If the focal firm’s product differentiation strategy is effective:
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 13
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-1313
The Value of Product Different
• Threat of Entry• would-be entrants face the costs of overcoming
customers’ preferences for the focal firm’s products and/or services
• Example: Toyota was protected from Hyundai’s entry into the U.S. market because Hyundai had to enter at a low price and advertise heavily to attract customers away from Toyota’s well-established Corolla.
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 14
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-1414
The Value of Product Different
• Threat of Rivalry
• customers have, to some extent, segmented themselves based on their preferences for the products of the several competing firms in a market. Thus, the rivalry is generally lower among firms competing in a market of differentiated products.
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 15
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-1515
The Value of Product Different
• Threat of Substitutes
• customers will find the focal firm’s products and services substantially more attractive than substitute products (i.e., customers are less inclined to even try the substitute product and the focal firm is therefore insulated from the threat of the substitute)
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 16
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-1616
The Value of Product Different
• Threat of Suppliers• the power of suppliers may be mitigated in two ways.
First, the focal firm will likely be able to pass supplier price increases along to customers who have a preference for the focal firm’s differentiated product (customers with a preference for a differentiated product tend not to be price sensitive). Second, a firm that enjoys the strong preference of customers will usually have more bargaining power with suppliers compared to competitors that do not have differentiated products and services.
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 17
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-1717
The Value of Product Different
• Threat of Buyers• the power of buyers is reduced because the
focal firm enjoys a quasi-monopoly. By definition, if a firm has a highly differentiated product, then the firm is the only firm in that market that can offer that particular product. Customers with a preference for the focal firm’s products and services must buy from the focal firm, thus reducing the power of buyers.
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 18
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-1818
Fragmented Industry
Branding: commodity differentiated product
Example: Kellogg’s Corn Flakes
Emerging Industry
First mover advantages: captures market share
Example: Motorola Cell Phones
Exploiting Industry-type Opportunities
The Value of Product Differentiation
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 19
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-1919
Exploiting Industry-type Opportunities
Mature Industry
Refining product or adding services
Example: Ford’s emphasis on service
Declining Industry
Exploiting niches: serving those with strong needs
Example: NEWT at the Royal Hawaiian
The Value of Product Differentiation
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 20
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-2020
Exploiting Other Opportunities
Trends or Fads
• surf clothing
Government Policy
• Toyota Prius
• airport x-ray machines
Social Causes
• themed credit cards
• animal safe clothing
Economic Conditions• outplacement agencies
• check cashing services
The Value of Product Differentiation
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 21
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-2121
Rareness of Product Differentiation
By definition, we assume rareness
• if a product is differentiated, it is rareenough
• customer preferences are evidence of a differentiated product
• increased volume of purchases
• and/or a premium price
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 22
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-2222
Imitability of Product Differentiation
Logic of costs of imitation
• if would-be imitators face a cost disadvantageof imitation, they will rationally choose not toimitate
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 23
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-2323
Imitability of Product Differentiation
• Easy to Duplicate
• Product Features
• are easy for competitors to observe
• unless there is a patent, competitors face little cost in imitation
• may lead to temporary competitive advantage until competitors are able to imitate
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 24
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-2424
Imitability of Product Differentiation
• May be Costly to Duplicate• Product mix
• Links with other firms
• Product customization
• Product complexity
• Consumer marketing
• these bases all entail a relationship and/or the need for coordination• if any of these relationships and/or coordination efforts are marked
by unique historical circumstances, causal ambiguity, or more likely, social complexity, then it may be costly for other firms to imitate these relationships
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 25
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-2525
Imitability of Product Differentiation
• Usually Costly to Duplicate• Links between functions
• Timing
• Location
• Reputation
• Distribution channels
• Service and support• all have the common element of uniqueness in some way, most of the time (specific
linkages can exist only in the focal firm, there is only one ‘first mover’, there is only one of a prime location, there is only one firm reputation, etc.)
• in many cases, it would be impossible for a competitor to duplicate the base of differentiation
• links, reputation, distribution channels, and service and support all depend on relationships
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 26
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-2626
Imitability of Product Differentiation
Substitutes
• some substitutes may be obvious
• some substitutes may not be obvious
• if no substitutes are obvious, then we wouldconclude that imitation through substitutionwill be costly—at least for the present time
• if a base of differentiation is valuable, otherswill attempt to imitate it through duplicationand/or substitution
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 27
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-2727
Organizing for Product Differentiation
Example: Ford Taurus Cross-Functional Teams
OrganizationalStructure
• U-Form with cross-functionalteams
ManagementControls
CompensationPolicies
• flexibility
• broad guidelines
• creativityencouraged
Reward:• cross-
functionalcooperation
• creativity
• risk taking
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 28
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-2828
Cost Leadership and Product Differentiation
Can a firm pursue both simultaneously?
No Yes
• use of structure,management control,and compensationpolicies are nearlyopposites
• firms can do bothbecause some basesof differentiation alsolend themselves to low cost
• structure, controls, &policies are not opposites
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 29
Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 5-5-2929
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the
United States of America.
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall